Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 6

Writer of the Year

The Thinker (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 17 people who are not Thinkerer

1. Nomination + Support. The Thinker has had one hell of a year writing articles; he's got a number 17 on the Hall of Shame, but if you counted all the collaborations and rewritings he's done in full, that number balloons to a full 20. Not to mention that he's the man with the most articles in the Top3, including but not limited to Mr. Kearsy, Folgers Crystals, Drunk Olympics, and the most highly favored article on VFH to date, Why?:Pour Boiling Hot Water Down Your Trousers?. His features aren't all he's got, though, as he's spent a lot of his writing on the site THINKERING less fortunate articles rather than just starting from scratch, and these rewrites and collaborations are only second in quantity to One Eyed Jack, and likely the best in quality the whole wiki over. In short, it's a real tough call to make, but Thinker just about edges out the competition in my book, and since I didn't get to vote for him on WotM, I'll give him my vote here. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
2. Big Support. THINKER is my favorite writer on this site (even more than myself). Many of his articles are my personal favorites. I log on to Uncyc looking forward any new articles he might have. I believe that he deserves it the most. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 06:01, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
3. For. Whether it be his own originals, collaborations, or THINKERing the hell out of other people's stuff, he contributes brilliant stuff consistently. This is a really tough call given the quality of the noms, and I wouldn't complain if any of these guys won, but THINKER deserves it most in my book. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:31, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
4. I'm too hungover to write things. THINKER is the best writer on the site. Give him this. The end. -RAHB 20:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
5. For --Æ 20:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
6. STRONG FOR. Per RAHB's hungover yet true comment. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:54 Jan 01, 2008
7. For. After going through some of his stuff, I must say he is a very funny guy. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 19:04, Jan 2
8. For. Responsible (at least in part) for two of the very best articles of the year. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
9. Five Just cause I can--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 08:16, 4 January 2008 (UTC
10. for THINKER is genuinely hilarious. if he wins, i shall erect a monument in his honor. "Violetflavoured nuisance 01:10, 7

    Well, I hate to tell you this, but I've already "erected" a "monument" in his honor, if you know what I mean, heh, heh..... penis...-RAHB 07:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

11. for Funny, funny stuff... I nearly peed myself.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 04:43, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
12. WHY IS THIS SO HARD EACH YEAR?!?!?!?! Oh, I mean, for Thinker, but damn, that's an awesome field of candidates.--<<>> 13:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
13. For. His vote for me means a lot, but that's irrelevant. I came to this page intending to vote for him in the first place. --So So 09:54, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
14. Dig. A difficult choice between The Thinker and So So. Sir Roger 04:47, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
15. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH TOO HARD Can I split my vote up amongst Thinker, LedBalloon, Ljlego, Mhaille and Modusoperandi? Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
16. Support This is the one I should be voting for. I like some of those articles he wrote. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 14:26, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
17. Quite possibly the best writer on the site at this time, though many others on this list have pushed him pretty close. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

TheLedBalloon (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2 classic rock band ripoffs

1. Nomination. TLB started out the year as a bit of a noob, but as time progressed his talent in writing became exponentially more obvious. He's composed two of the funniest articles I've ever read, Volcano and Heat death of the universe, and another whopping 13 features to boot. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
2. For Led knows what's going on. I haven't graduated from his adoption program yet, but I can tell you that he actually knows what "funny" is. I have had close experience writing with him (see Heat death of the universe), and he is not only a funny writer, but is someone who can explain why what they write is funny. I think that is the essence of someone who is the best writer of the year, out of some 60,000 registered users.   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 1) 00:29
3. For. as per woah, what cajek said. Also, he's great on ?pedia too. Also, wut? Also,~Fag x FS

Ljlego (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5jlego

1. Nomination. Ljlego's got it all: quality, quantity, and cajones. He's got the highest article-to-feature ratio on the site and a total feature count of 22.5, a number rivaled only by the legendary Savethemooses. Plus, he's from Long Island. Who could forget such articles as Nazi, HowTo:Be a Gangsta, the iconic Chuck Norris, and my personal favorite Mad TV. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:12, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
2. For --Imperator█Dark_Apostrophe█The Memory Hole 13:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
3. For I've watched this Uncyclopedian grow from a young youngster to a youngster (sniff) and I'm so proud of the work that Ljlego contributes, and the ongoing quality apparent in it. Many of the other nominees are real Hall of Fame members, Ljlego should be the next to join you. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:15, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
4. 4. Lj's a talented writer who writes some damn good articles. --User:Jack Phoenix/sig 10:59, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
5. For. This was extremely close between him and Modus. Extremely close. I mean, I actually went back and forth, editing Lj and then MO's sections, drafting witty vote after witty vote and then changing my mind and having to write more witty votes for the other candidate. Then I played Tetris for about an hour. But after that it became clear that the best choice was Ljlego. He's hilarious, and he's got a boatload of features. I mean, Jesus, 22.5 features. I don't know if that's skill or luck or whoring or what, but whatever it is it's pretty goddamned impressive if you ask me. So yeah. Ljlego's cool and should win whatever award this is. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:55, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
6. For - I like statistics. I like funnies. I like Ljlego. — Sir Manticore 12:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +11 Mad Cats

1. N+F This has been MO's year, from an unknown Canadian to that pompous parade of odd letters you see trailing his signature. In my opinion, one of the most talented writers we have around, who makes not only top notch articles but also makes every conversation with him an "exciting" experience. Modus is my choice for the year, he deserves it, that handsome bastard. ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 07:11, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
2. For...I'm glad we have so many great writers to choose from, but I can only vote for one--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 13:26, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
3. For As per spinning Jew-star-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 16:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
4. Whereas I cannot morally vote for a loose whore like Ljlego, I'm torn between so many of these other writers, so I have to say that this is a really tough decision for me. However, I must vote for MO because he's an excellent writer, Uncyclopedia's lead commentator on the Village Dump, and because I fucked his father in the ass. There's a video out on the internet about it. It's called something like "mrhands.mpg". Anyways, For. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 20:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
5. For. Per the above. He deserves this award. Give it to him. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:06, Jan 1
6. For - I knew this was going to be a hard choice. Everyone who has been nominated is very talented, but Modus just edges ahead of the rest IMO. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
7. For -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 08:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
8. For --MrN  Fork you! 19:15, Jan 6
9. For. - Hell yes, he's written some damn good stuff if you ask me...And well anyone else for that matter (Bonner) (Talk) Jan 6, 19:18
10. Strong For. One of the few writers I know who can write just as easily with caustic satire as with patent silliness, he has consistently written above and beyond the competition. He's also written quite a few articles that have slipped under the VFH radar, but are brilliant nonetheless. (He's also one of the funniest posters around, both in forums and, it seems, even on VFH.) As Mordillo said, this has been MO's year. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 06:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
11. For. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:41, 28 Jan 2008

So So (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1 ...so?

1. Nomination. Meet So So. See So So write. See So So write well. See So So write funny. He may have few features in comparison with the likes of Lj and Modus, but I think his consistent, awesome quality merits a nom, in my book. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:49, Jan 1
2. Dig. I'm not going to delve into a long tirade on why I love So So's work, or why I believe he deserves this award. Let me just say that, of the people that I personally believe to have an innate command of comedic functions (especially subtlety), his name tops the list. And to me, that command is one of the highest benchmarks a humorist can attain. Everyone nominated here is already a champion. So So gets my vote. --THINKER 21:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

   Comment It kills me not to vote for my favorite Uncyc writer ever, but that's just how it goes. I'll always love you! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

And I-I-I-I-I-ee-I will always love yooooo-ooooo-ooooooouuu, oh! --Whitney Houston 10:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

Mhaille (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +7 Cheeky Scouse Chappies

1. Nomination - he has twenty features under his belt. While he isn't getting my vote, he still should have the nom. --Æ 17:00, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
2. For. The Master. That is all. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:10, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
3. For He's sung, but not sung enough. Far not enough. ADDENDUM: I realize now that my reason sucks like a monkey on a popsicle, so read this part too. Mhaille is far more than a writer like me, who puts many articles out. He is far more than Modusoperandi, who puts out many good articles, and will occasionally help a brother out. He is far more than a writer even like Thinker, a man who I greatly respect and admire, who will reshape an article to better suit the high-quality standard we like to pretend to uphold. No, Mhaille is more than that. Mhaille is an always-brilliant satirist who takes his adaptable tone and will subtly apply it to others' work, also giving the authors tips and tricks of the trade. A true maker of featured articles whose count is far higher than mine and STM's combined when you count the uncredited features he helped build, he deserves this, and it's a pity he doesn't seem to be getting it. As the author of the article which inspired me to start here, Mhaille will always be #1 for me.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 03:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
4. For. This year is fucking hard. I mean, I'm not nominated, which would probably make this vote even more of a close race in my heart, but this is still pretty damn hard. That said, Mhaille is the best, and always will be the best. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
5. For. He's been the most helpful person to me on this site.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 20:17, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
6. For - Yes, it's extremely late, but I had to give it a lot of thought. I was leaning towards Thinkerer, but to me more memorable articles were written by Mhaille. Some of my favorites include Oscar Wilde, Goa Tse, Hannah Montana (and some other Nazi stuff I liked), Shot your fuck up, Schrödinger's cat, etc. Not to mention he can come up with gold in a matter of minutes. Though I hate Noel Coward quotes with a passion, Mhaille's got my vote. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 14:33, Jan. 14, 2008
7. Five UKer, meet E-stoner --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 13:24, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

THE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1HE

1. Nomination Who could forget about our very favoritest insane-o-zor? A guy who knows what he's doing and isn't afraid to pretend he doesn't, THE deserves a shot.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
2. For THE best person ever --Polystyrene Man 19:41, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Year

67.72.98.46 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom and super for!!! - I know he's been inactive for a while, but this guy deserves it! --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)

Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0 homicidal amphibians

1. Nomination, but withholding my vote 'til a bit later. There are so many people I wanted to nom for this, and TKF is definitely one of them. His talents stretch to all areas of work in the site, from welcoming new users to huffing and ICUing in Newpages. He even has time to write some amazing fantastic articles. His sysopping has only made him an even more helpful contributor, and I hope he continues as one of the most reasonable admins around. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:56, Jan 1
2. For TKF has been around since time immemorial. He's been an admin since November. Trust in Frog.   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 1) 01:24

   Erm, he has been admin since December. I know, I was in his inauguration. He wore light green robe with a very big cleavage. I know, it seemed strange to me as well at the time. ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 09:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

3. For A tough decision, and yet I am very clear on who I think deserves it the most. -RAHB 02:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
4. For. if it's good enough for Cajek, it's good enough for me. Also, I agree. Also, wut? Also, buttsecks? Also, ~Fag x FS

• Comment! Everyone who voted for me should read this! I'm hereby throwing my base behind Algorithm, so if you love me more than the other guys, it's time for you guys to suddenly love Algo more than me. VOTE/EAT ALGO! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:17, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

MadMax (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +18 ass-less leather pants

1. Nomination and a BIG For. What can be said about MadMax? Probably very little actually, for a guy who quietly goes about the business of cleaning up all the crap on Uncyclopedia. For the guy who should have been made a sysop at least a year before he was. For the guy who is a one man army, organising, deleting cruft, he never sleeps. One of the few contributors that you can almost guarantee will have edited something on most articles on this site. Step forward, MadMax! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
2. For No offense to the other nominees, of course, but I'm inclined to say that anybody not voting for MadMax has simply failed to notice all the work he actually does, and not just in 2007 (although he fully deserves the award for this year alone). In honor of his long, long history at Uncyc, unmatched in length and efficiency, Max had better win or I'm machete-ing somebody's dog or small child. —rc (t) 06:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

   Always the charmer...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

3. For. Although all of the nominees are extremely worthy, the sheer volume of work MadMax does is phenomenal, and deserves full recognition. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
4. For. The man with the single greatest volume of contributions to the site, and the true unsung hero of Uncyclopedia. So let's sing already. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
5. Strong For--Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:34, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
6. Approve. This guy deserves it more than anyone else. ~

   Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.

   1/01/2008 @ 23:37
7. Dah! Does good work, is efficient, performs quanity, but with quality. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:15, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
8. For-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
9. For - Yah, and not just because I'm worried about what rc will do to my dog. -- sannse esnnas 11:05, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
10. For - Bastard beats me to the revert far too often. He's also a total mainspace whore. — Sir Manticore 12:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
11. EXTREME STRAIGHT FOR - Mhaille and RC say it all really, he does a hell of a lot of work that the rest of us are too lazy to do and never seems to let up (Bonner) (Talk) Jan 3, 13:49
12. For ... quietly goes about the business of fighting crime on uncyc...and he's Mhaille-Approved!--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 14:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
13. For. As much as I want to vote for Algorithm, I never seem to go onto recent changes without seeing MadMax on it. For the sheer volume of work he does, MadMax gets my vote. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
14. For - Yeah, I s'pose he makes edits here occasionally. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:58, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
15. Hell yes —Hinoa talk.kun 23:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
16. Definitely Among much else, even took time to thank me for my Cristmas card. --YeOldeLuke 04:53, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
17. For I can't even look at Special:Recentchanges without seeing his darn name all over it. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 14:37, Jan. 14, 2008
18. For. ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 14:47, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

One-eyed Jack (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7-eyed Jack

1. Nomination, but withholding my vote 'til a bit later. OEJ is a little bit inactive in the past couple weeks, but that doesn't change the fact that he has done some great stuff for the site. I know he's done a bunch of great stuff in VFD, but I mostly know him as a pee reviewer. In fact, I'd even go so far as to say that he invented the real review, the one that's actually helpful, and ushered in an age of extremely helpful reviewers. He has also written more articles about more things than I've ever seen. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:13, Jan 1
2. Strong For--Æ 01:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
3. Very Strong For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 06:04, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
4. For per LedBalloon. I remember the olden times, when putting an article on Pee Review basically meant you were waiting for OEJ to look it over for you. Now that the tradition is distributed a tiny bit more evenly, we can finally acknowledge his amazingness. --The Acceptable  Cainad  (Fnord) 21:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
5. For my favorite non-op at Uncyclopedia.--<<>> 22:08, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
6. For ---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 19:51, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
7. 4 --DJ Irreverent 06:08, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Algorithm (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 12 dog foods...

1. Nomination and For. There are people like MadMax who do lots of little work around the site. Then there are people like myself, who do more noticeable stuff in bulk. Then there are people like Algorithm, who keep the site functioning. If not for Algorithm, we'd likely be stuck in 2005, and probably not even exist. He's done more background work and tinkled around in Uncyclopedia's circuit board more than any other user for the past three years; it's a total shame that he's without this award so far. Algo is a vital cornerstone of the site, and a damned great dog food, too. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:16, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

   Comment I agree with everything TKF said. Algo has contributed the Forum system, the <choose> extension and numerous other bits of now-used-everywhere Uncyc tech. I stand by my vote for MadMax, but if you must vote for someone else, make it Algorithm or else I'll piano-wire your wife or husband. —rc (t) 06:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

2. DIG Algo is my hero, and one helluva guy. Almost like Yanni. He kept this asshole around when I was very close to leaving. I hope Max wins too, because he certainly deserves it, but Algo is just quality people and the ratchet that keeps this place running like a well-oiled topless wrestler machine. --THINKER 16:00, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
3. 4: Al is one of the great unsung heroes of Uncyclopedia and until his song gets sung, I'll keep pushing to make that happen. --Sir gwax (talk) 23:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
4. Strong For I want to start off by saying that this was one of the hardest choices I've had to make, and that all of these people would probably make a better president than any of the nominees. That said, Algo is, as TKF said, among the most hardworking, helpful, and all-around good guys of the site. We have him to thank for the wonderful new VFP system (which has sadly gone unnoticed, if one takes the quality of nominations into account), those things that rcmurphy mentioned, and being the only active admin on the site for the better part of this summer. When louder and more noticeable admins were contributing to the forum madness instead of doing their duties, Algo quietly took over, banning blankers, featuring articles, and moving this site along at a clip that never seemed to miss a beat. Without MadMax, we would have several more uncategorized pages, several fewer redirects, and a volume of edits that, now that we have them, is seemingly indispensable. Without TKF, we would be less several hilarious pages, thousands of unreverted vandalizations, and an all-around good user. Without One-Eyed Jack, Pee Review would be a festering hole of unloved crap, much of which is a chore to read. Without RDB, we'd see a lot less recent changes. Without Zombiebaron, we'd have a lot of trouble moving forward. But where everyone on this page is a recent-changes monster and revert-o-matic, Algorithm offers something more, something that puts him a cut above the rest. And that's why he gets my vote.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:09, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
5. Yeah. Lj said it all. TKF is my close 2nd choice, but I had no idea of all the things that Algo did behind the scenes before this award; I've taken so much of it for granted. So yeah. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:37, Jan 7
6. For Did I say I was very clear before? Oh, that was a lie. Yes, everybody here deserves this, though Lj seemed to say everything best. Algo FTW. -RAHB 00:10, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
7. For, a scholar and a gentleman. Plus, he's good with the codeystuff. And no, not just Codeine's stuff. Other codeystuff too. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:24, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
8. For TKF convinced me.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 9 (02:48)
9. For I agree with TKF.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 19:20, 10 January 2008 (UTC)
10. For. as per TKF. Could I eat yew too? :P ~Fag x FS
11. Fore per TKF. I tend to agree with him here. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Sawblade5 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
12. For -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 02:02, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Roman Dog Bird (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

1. Nomination, but withholding my vote 'til a bit later. All over the site, from RecentChanges to Special:Random, RDB finds crap that has festered on otherwise-decent articles. He then purges that crap. For this reason, he is more than qualified to be up for this award. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:22, Jan 1
2. Comment Unfortunately, it seems that there are so very many unsung heroes of Uncyclopedia. RDB is another one of these greats. His horn isn't being tooted quite so much as the rest of these candidates, but it deserves some. Toot toot. I'm tired, let's get some pork or something.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 04:19, 27 January 2008 (UTC)

Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: Zomb1ebaron

1. Nomination As Led, I'm holding off on voting. And for fun, I'm making things even more difficult when it comes to choices. Like it or not, Zombiebaron has been integral to this site that we love so much as this past year has gone on. Whether it be banning the 'tards that most people don't have the balls to ban, or being one of the two or three active admins on the site come August/September (and probably the most efficient of them), ZB has fully marked himself deserving of this award. Sure, he may be a little bit abrasive at times, but just like Famine before him, without Zombiebaron, we wouldn't be nothing.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

   Comment You used a double negative in that last sentence, Lj. I guess what you mean is that Zombiebaron is the root of all our problems.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 02:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

   Just my luck. I try to give my nomination a nice, down-home appeal to it and you come around with your fickle grammar and whatnot.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:52, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

   I told you that English was an idiotic language!!!! ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 13:02, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

   You did? I couldn't understand what you were saying. You're sure it was English?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:22, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

2. For Because of what I have seen in my short time here... MrN  Fork you! 21:31, Jan 6

January

Writer of the Month

THE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 14HE

• Nomfur Look man. He deserved it last month. He still deserves it. And as is the nature of all deserving winners, he won't win it for another two months. Alas, I begin my epic struggle to bring this award to probably one of the top 3 writers on Uncyclopedia. Viva La THE. -RAHB 02:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• for. because i never would have found uncyclopedia if i hadn't followed his instructions.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 03:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• DIG oh come the fuck on you idiots.. --THINKER 20:32, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• For I agree with Thinker.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 22:16, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• TEH! whoops! crap!   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 2) 23:01
• For THE not for president but because. --Polystyrene Man 19:43, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• For. Was tempted to vote against because of Thinker's comment, frankly, but THE is just oo good not to get this (finally!) --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 19:46, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• Well, like RAHB, I'm really sick of WotM being a popularity contest. File suit. --THINKER 21:38, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• Look, I'm sorry, ok! I'm sorry I have beautiful clothes, a flashy smile, a too-cool-to-care attitude, and am universally loved by everyone! It's not my fault that I'm popular! I'm sorry I'm so damned cool! I can't help it, people just love me!! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:51, Jan 3
• uh, ow.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 3 (21:49)

• Well can I PLEASE sit at your fucking lunch table already?! JESUS! --THINKER 22:04, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• Dunno, do you know the secret cool word? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:10, Jan 3

• Antidisestablishmentarianism? --THINKER 22:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

• hahahaha, I-- wait. Damn. Ok, you're in. So, got any candy in your lunchbox? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:22, Jan 3

• It's really more of a yellowish suit, a bit like Keaton's in The Usual Suspects. /takes it to Thinker's talk page. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:33, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

• For He didn't win last time? Jeez..... - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 21:55, Jan 3
• It is a fucking popularity contest, and THE is very popular! now that was idiotic ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 00:31, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• EHT! isn't that a kind of milk? Also, for. Also, as per everyone else ever. Also, wut? Also,~Fag x FS
• THE. My favouritest pre-noun--Moneke 08:26, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• I think I came up with something witty last month. Well, Zombiebaron should do nicely. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:18, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• For. I was proud to do the honors in nominating one of his particularly brilliant news articles. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 07:39, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
• For. the writer of the month. MrN  Fork you! 02:34, Jan 28

Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom - he has written several good articles and was the runner up in last month's competition--Æ 01:27, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For Poo poo!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 06:14, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

Gerrycheevers (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7

• With his guarantee thing, he wrote what I think is somewhere around 15 or so quality articles this month, a few of which of which were featured. A few more were quasi-featured, as Mr Cheevers has had some horrible luck on VFH. He is definitely deserving of some recognition for all his great articles. Nom & For. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:34, Jan 2
• For - Now seems like the ideal time for Mr. Cheevers to win the award. Plenty of good articles in the last few months. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:56, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• For. Wrote some good stuff last month. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  19:35, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• For. Very impressing showing, lad. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:33, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• For --Æ 21:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• For- The Red Baron was great.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 22:23, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
• FUCK YEAH, MAN Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 06:34, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Noob of The Month

Anakin (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4 Atlanta citizens

• Nomination Methinks he's done a fine job on Atlanta. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• For - seems to be going in the correct direction. He's asked me questions as well as others and wrote a good first article--Æ 01:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• For As an eligible n00b (which always helps when running for n00by of the month), and a fine n00b at that, young Anakin has won my vote. --THE 20:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Dig THINKER graduates another success. You're welcome Uncyclopedia! (Also, came for help, stuck with his work, and integrated advice into the piece very well -- couldn't ask for more from a newbie) --THINKER 20:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment in SUH-thun THA-eenks, GAHS! AH REE-luh a-PREE-shee-AYT it!--Anakin 04:56, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
• 4 -RAHB 04:09, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

DJ Irreverent (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 10

• I don't think Fag's going to reach consensus, so let's vote for DJ. First of all, he's on his way to a feature. Second of all, he is NOT a character on Full House. Vote for DJ!   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 11 (14:53)
• For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• Ineligible - unless I am wrong, he did not write anything according to his contributions. UnTunes:I Am The Very Model of a Crazy Fundamentalist was written by Moneke--Æ 18:13, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • My bad, he's a friend of Moneke, and collaborated with him. Still isn't eliglbe--Æ 18:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • He is NOT ineligible, AE. He is under 30 days of age!   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 11 (18:17)
• He needs a full article and he doesn't have one yet. Collaborations with other users don't count as full articles.--Æ 18:18, 11 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Have written at least one "full" article. - that says nothing about collaborations, one way or the other. Me thinks eligible. -RAHB 02:34, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
    • According to his userpage, he's got two collabs, which should together count as a full article. Eh? Ligible? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:37, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
      • It's up to you, Mr. Admin!   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 12 (02:41)
        • I say eligible. I also say Vote Mordillo for WOTM. But no one ever listens. Ever. Phsewww. ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 14:22, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
• Thank you all... Damn, people already like me. I am writing some articles right now. Like this!--DJ Irreverent 05:46, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
• Bah. lucky bastard :P --Moneke 13:49, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
• For Rather than be bitter, I'm gonna give this to someone who also deserves it. ~Fag x FS
• For. I've seen him around quite a bit, voting on stuff, picking up bad stuff to re-write, generally making loads of contributions and stuff (although some more judicious use of the preview button could be in order!) and generally doing good, helpful stuff. Anakin's contributed a good article, which is fine, but this guy's done loads! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:11, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
• For I've seen him doing some good stuff around here. - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 16:28, Jan 20
• For. ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 12:51, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
• For. MrN  Fork you! 13:48, Jan 27
• For. Good guy, funny, looks promising. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 02:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Fag (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom and For Fag's done a lot of work here for being only less than a month old (please god, say that he's not a month old)   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 7 (14:16)

Comment I'm pretty sure that I'm less than a month old here... but if not, may I remind you of my persistent arguing? I've spoke to many people about my belief that the limit for NotM should be bigger because people who join later in the month, expecially in the later half of the month will not win as in their time they will find people cannot win towards the end of the month due to nominations already having been long underway, and will not be able to win next month's as they will not have been able to contribute enough in such a short time, so are rendered totally ineligible...... That's just for the people that haven't heard this from me yet :P ~Fag x FS

Comment the month limit always seemed weird to me.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 7 (14:49)

Comment I must apologise to you again Fag. I do not think your eligible under the current rules. By 4 days if I can count. That is harsh. Can someone please tell me I'm wrong? MrN  Fork you! 15:01, Jan 7

Comment ...is, then, why I uphold my theory even more. ~Fag x FS

Sorry guys, MrN is right. Fag = Bummed. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:58, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to yew, as it seems the time may be increased ater all. See Forum:An issue with NotM. ~Fag x FS

Fag, four votes for, one of which are yours, are hardly consensus. Wait for an admin to settle the issue. ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 12:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

• Is it against etiquette if I self-for? Hope not... I might rectify it if that's consensus :P ~Fag x FS

Contestant (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom and For - he returned from a 7 month vacation on December 11th and started a good article so he technically counts as a n00b? Right? Also, he said he wouldn't turn down the nom--Æ 00:25, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Be serious. Also, he's already got one. ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 00:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
  • /me thwaps ae. No! No! Bad exploitation of the rules! Bad! No biscuit! Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 01:18, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Drama (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

1. Nomination This user's flamewars have recently been nothing. Absolutely nothing. I spit on this user's flamewars. P-tooey!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

   a) not a noob. b) not a noob. c) fictional, mostly. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:23, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Unknown user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3

1. He hasn't really been around longer than a month. He truly became active in either late November or early December, and featured an article in a short time. He deserves it.   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 3) 03:24

comment - You know, I only became active in quite late November, but I imagine no sober person would nominate me again. Actually, even I wouldn't nominate me again. I'm just not much of a noob, I'm more an evil writer/mega whore. Rofl. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 03:44, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Be humble all you want, you're also ineligible anyway. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

1. He voted against my last article on vfh, I think, and therefore killed it, but I'm for--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 04:07, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

   Last contrib dates all the way back to June. Illegible. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:08, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

well FINE, killjoy--Sir Shandon (Talk) (Trophy Room) 14:12, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

To say that I "contributed" back then would be an understatement. Sure, I rewrote the whole damn article on pancakes (and it still sucks), but the real question is what have I really done for Unc from that date? Any features? No Any pees? No Did I talk to any other users? No. All this happened 5 months later, in late november when my real noobship began, and I decided I liked Unc enough, that I asked leddy to adopt me. Soon after, BAM! my first feature the day after christmas, and a whole bunch of "Quality" reviews as per Cajeks standards. Not to rant on any more, but I digest, but isn't being in AAN automatically qualify me for NOTM? I mean AAN=Noob and NotM=Noob, so why can't I be a noob? What if someone came in here from ED and hit the ground running? Is he still a noob even though he clearly knows what he has to do to succeed? You should really look into deeper things instead of age based on first contributions, such as how nooby were they? Think about it.-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} 20:53, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

First off, being in Adopt-a-Noob doesn't mean you can become Noob of the Month. NotM has age restrictions because being a noob is all up to personal interpretation. I've been around since August, but I still hardly do a damn thing around here. Five months later, I wouldn't be surprised if some (or many) people still consider me to be a noob. However, there is probably not a single person on this site that would even consider allowing me to be eligible for this award. What's more, I registered in March. So, like you, I registered, had a long period of inactivity, and came back. There have to be set restrictions, or every other month this award would turn into a flamewar over some newbie that thinks they deserve the award, while everybody else argues that they don't. Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 21:30, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

That being said, let's not turn this into a flamewar over some newbie that thinks they deserve the award while everyone else argues that they don't. NEXT CONTESTANT! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:15, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Contestant isn't eligible either. He already won the award. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Meh, whaddaya say we just give it to Rc and call it a day? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:31, Jan 4

Hey now, I wouldn't turn down another piece on the mantle. Is that an innuendo? mayyyyybe Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:39, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

You know, I wouldn't turn down another NotM myself. Think about it. I've done almost nothing for the site since September-ish, then BAM! I'm active again! That qualifies for being a noob, right? right?! -RAHB 21:37, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

4 - Hell, I don't care, I'll vote for myself.-- Sir Unknown User ^{(Talk : Cont : VFH : PEE : CUN)} Jan 6 07:50

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +0

• Nom and For - he deserves this. What else is there to say?--Æ 00:38, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• NO! Why are you all giving up so early?   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 4 (00:42)

  Why?:Give Up explains the answers. Nuff' said--Æ 00:47, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

  I wrote that piece of shit article. I already know how to give up.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 4 (00:49)

  Remember, kids. Every time you don't indent, a whale dies a horrible, bloody, painful death. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:52, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

  Dammit Boomer, go review something! This is your mother speaking! (worth a shot)   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 4 (00:55)

  M...mom? You came back? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

  Yes, sweetheart! Remember me? Your mom? I came back from the retirement home to tell you to do things for Cajek.   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 4 (01:14)

• For having a tender moment with Boomer's mom.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:19, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• Against - And please make it a bannable offence if you nominate this guy. --AAA! (AAAA) 08:07, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• For And please make it a bannable offense if you vote against this guy -RAHB21:41, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• Comment I seem to be making a pretty good run at Noob of the Year, and if that works out I will probably retire from NotM consideration at least for the near future. This does not preclude a 2009 Comeback Tour, mind. —rc (t) 23:25, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Just like Madonna, to the very end.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:23, 5 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Even down to the spikey cone bra. What a trooper! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• FOR!-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 05:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
• Bah against. Also, stop it. Also, stop it. Also, stop it. ~Fag x FS

Comment that's not a spiteful thing, I'm annoyed ywr being nominated all the time for NotM even though there are thoroughly decent actual n00bs nominated each month. I voted for yew on NotY just to prove that point :P ~Fag x FS

• For, so he will not be nommed again. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
• Against - Rc will have my vote the day Main Page gets featured. 100% serious. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 08:41, Jan. 17, 2008

Uncyclopedian of the Month

MrN9000 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2

• Nom & For N shuffles around, doing the little things that make this site not only good, but doubleplus good. N for... whatever this award is! Give it to him!   Le Cejak • <-> (Jan 1) 14:47
• EPIC for he's one of the best writers and most helpful users we have at the moment. ~Fag x FS

Charitwo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +8

• Nom. I'd like to call Mr. Charitwo, "the silent reverter". Even though the guy stays under the radar, if you check his contributions you can see that he is just about anywhere, boldly fighting vandals, spammers and blankers. Just to show that his efforts has not gone unnoticed. ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 12:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For - I've seen him a lot on recent changes reverting vandalism and doing useful things. Now he shall go noticed--Æ 12:51, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For! It was hard to decided between him and Techno, but Charitwo's beaten me to too many reverts recently not to vote for him. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For Per TKF/AE/Mordillo. -RAHB 02:21, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• For If just on IRC vigilance alone, he's got most beat. All the time, I'm on minding my own business and he's like "Lj, this is going on. Lj, that's going on. Lj, vandal breakout." Fun, t'is.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:56, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• For -- Gotta atleast support someone right. --NXWave 23:00, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• For. A quick look at his contribs tells you a lot. I admit to not noticing him, but now I know I'm glad he's here! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:04, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
• For --AAA! (AAAA) 01:06, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
• AE told me to. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 01:49 7 Jan, 2008)

RabbiTechno (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: TenbbiTechno

• Nom. Our friend JT, is one of the friendliest users around. Always helping, making suggestions and smiling crookedly all over the place. And he's a rabbi. What more can one ask for? ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 12:40, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• Four! ~ He's, like, awesome. Need I say more? sleepygamer _{Phencyclidine} TALK _STUFF 18:18, Jan 1
• This is a mitzvah Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Dig mazel tov. --THINKER 22:48, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
• Hells Yeah! (Bonner) (Talk) Jan 4, 11:07
• For I introduced him to this place and then sat back and watched while he contributed far more than I'm ever likely to. Besides, the poor guy needs something to cheer him up at the moment (see his userpage). Juan Kerr 19:00, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
• For - Far better than any other person or robot nominated this month. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:27, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
• ...And For ~ Mordillo where is my CHRISTIANITY? 12:48, 27 January 2008 (UTC)
• For! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 12:58 Jan 27, 2008
• For I actually don't know what I was thinking not voting for this guy. -RAHB 04:06, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
• Welsh AND Jewish....this guy deserves our respect. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Cajek (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2

• Nom + For - Over 11,000 contributions in 6 months. Crazy. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:51, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment Not for nothing, but virtually none of those edits have been "keeping this place tidy" edits. Several could have been condensed using the preview button as well. This isn't to take away from Cajek (substantially), but the facts should be known.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:54, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Seriously most of those edits were before I understood the pervwei button. oh shit ...uh anyways, don't vote for me. Thank you so much, Cs1987, but I really don't deserve this!   Le Cejak • <-> Jan 5 (08:57)
• 4 He rocks! --DJ Irreverent 06:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

February

Noob of the Month

Luvvy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +9

• Nom. At the time of this nom, this user had been a member for less than 24 hours. Take a look at her userpage, and contributions. She has joined the proofreading service, started using the Poopsmith lounge, and shown an ability to learn ridiculously quickly. Watch this space... MrN  Fork you! 03:05, Feb 17
• For. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:10, Feb 17
• For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:58, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
• 444 Takes after me :D --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:55, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment on previous comment - Previous comment is presumably in fact a "for", and should be taken into count as such. And no, I am not voting for myself. Yet. ;) ---- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 11:08, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment He's already voted Luvvy. Sorry. MrN  Fork you! 11:49, Feb 17
      • Comment on comment on comment on...Nevermind... *sniffles*---- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 13:55, 17 February 2008(UTC)
        • Comment Changed, also monkey--Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
• Yeah I like this n00b. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:51, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment (still not voting for myself, that'll happen only if things get desperate...) Yay! I like you back. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 17:43, 20 Feb
• Against. - I really don't like excessive whoring... (Bonner) (Talk) Feb 20, 17:53
• F♥r. Already peed on some of her work, she certainly has potential. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 21:12 Feb 21)
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:30, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
• For. Has made some quality contributions, and is active, unlike that other guy who stopped at the start of the month. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:36, Feb 25
• Dig She's leaving her husband for me. The least I can do is throw her a vote. ;) --THINKER 16:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Awwww. Always the gentleman, eh? ;) -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 06:49, 26 Feb
• For -- Hindleyite Converse 20:13, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
• 4or A splendid n00b. Also, this is probably the strangest variation on the word "for" that I've ever executed. --THE 21:47, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment. Well I like it. Why choose between numbers and letters? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 21:52 Feb 28
• Commentgratulations U R Winner! Apparently. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 04:45, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Arotenbe (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3

• NF A young 'chopper who I expect will do well here, with this and extra goodness.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:43, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
• For If there is one thing we need, it's more nice choppers. he he MrN  Fork you! 22:06, Feb 16
• For. I asked him to register, the least I can do is vote! :) ~ 12:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Anakin (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

1. Nom+Dig The kid is definitely on his way. He did a great job with Atlanta and is now onto an UnScript that made me laugh. Got nommed last month and didn't make it, so here's the second bid. --THINKER 19:38, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Sadly, he's missed the cutoff by a few weeks (first contrib from middle of December) -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:47, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Feck. --THINKER 21:58, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

JGDross (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• NF – this n00b wrote decent articles and does good work at Pee Review --Æ 00:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• For. Yeah, I've seen him around, writing, reviewing and doing useful stuff. That's a good sign. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• F♥r. Who's this? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 15:31 4 Feb, 2008)
• Fag. Yeah, I've been seeing him about, doing a good job. --User:Fag/sig2 10:34, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• For The suspects released thing was great Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 01:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Dig --THINKER 16:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom. Let this be the 10th time he does deemed worthy enough to win this. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 22:45, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
• Against Text-based. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 22:54, Feb. 4, 2008
• against as per WotY --User:Fag/sig2 21:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
• For I would like to vote for rcmurphy. Not for his contributions which frankly I can't be bothered to read but because of examples of his fine work on Uncyc QDB. Comedy gold...seriously. --Sean.hoyland - tak() 01:53, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• Stacked For from the last several times i havent voted here Which is like 6 I think. Or just one sounds good too.--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 02:01, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• For, because JG needs some competition. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• I came back from my IRC retirement home just do vote against on this.... --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 05:37, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
• FOR This brotha brings da funk every night and day. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 22:02, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
• Against. Tradition mandates it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 15:40 Feb 25)
• Zombiebaron --AAA! (AAAA) 15:00, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
• 4our - Must... get... score... back to... zero! sleepygamer _{Phencyclidine} TALK _STUFF 12:21, Feb 27

Writer of the Month

Mordillo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3 vaguely sinister references that in some way smear Jews, because we're not politically correct. Also we're violently anti-semitic. Well, maybe not that last bit.

• Nom and for. With pages like Jewish Holidays, HowTo:Prevent your car radio from being stolen, The Porchesian Holocaust, My Journeys with the GPS and HowTo:Learn Hebrew, Mordillo has been standing in the wings, waiting patiently for a well-deserved WotM. With the soon-to-be-featured Truthful Vending GmbH, he should get it. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:53, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• For, KoShare alone makes him deserving of this award, and if you read Modusoperani's list, and add it to mine, I, for one, see that Mordillo is the most deservingful. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Will vote For next month — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 23:46, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• [Placeholder] I'm with Wehp. --THINKER 00:33, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• I'll vote for him next month if I see him write something new this month. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:31, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

there you go you cheeky bastard. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 13:38, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

• The Porchesian Holocaust WOW. Will Vote Next Month Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
• Well, I don't want to mess up the score thing going on down below, so I'm voting here... MrN  Fork you! 19:00, Feb 18
• Maybe not this month, but Mordillo certainly has a special place in my heart. March ploz? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 23:47 Feb 27)

15Mickey20

Score: 18Mickey20 (finally, this joke makes sense)(or does it?)(no it doesn't)

• Nomination and For. I've been a fan of Mr. Mickey for a long time, probably since UnCameron was featured in March of last year. Since then, he's been slowly but steadily writing fantastic, high-quality articles that always hit home. With six features so far (and a seventh likely on the way, straight out of the Poo Lit), 15Mickey20 clearly deserves this award. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 00:26, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• For. He's one of those people who's been having it coming, but don't write 15 articles per month, so their winnage isn't extremely evident. Makes me wish that Winstanley still wrote, though. Whatever the case, Mickey is a winner, and deserves this muchly. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:27, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• 4--Æ 00:33, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• For -- A brief look at Uncyclopedia:VFH/Featured convinced me that he's the man of the month. Also, somebody make sure that his rewrite of Paris Hilton gets FA'd after PLS. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:42, Feb 1
• Dig Mickey is a credit to this site and a damn fine writer and humorist. He's also so fine that it does, in fact, blow my mind. --THINKER 14:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• For - I love when a bunch of Aristocrats fuck on video. Not that there's anything wrong with that. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 00:26, Feb. 2, 2008
• For I didn't realize how much stuff that I enjoyed that this guy had actually written until this nom. Truly an unsung hero deserving of this award. -RAHB 06:42, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• ForHe is of the enjoyment making much like (ah Ingrish) Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
• For - He's captured what's funny about David Cameron in a way that no one else has i feel. --Knucmo2 20:39, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• For --THE 21:49, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• For. I think the biggest testimony to the quality of Mickey's work is that I'm prepared to vote for him ahead of Mordillo. That surprised me, but Mickey deserves this. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 22:09, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
• Strong for. He's consistently innovative and it appears he doesn't write anything unless it truly adds something new to the site. Also, I think the concept of UnCameron subconsciously inspired several of my articles. --So So 15:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• For - Like some people, I've been a fan since the days of UnCameron and Martina Hingis. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 10:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• For. Just another vote and the scoring is perfect! ~ 15:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
• Strong Fo' I was actually just waiting for 14 to come up so I could be the hero who made the score joke make complete sense. Also, Mickey, why don't you call me?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
• for. i was actually just waiting for 15 to come up so i could be the jerk who ruined the score joke. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 22:18, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

You shchmuck! ~ 04:45, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

• F♥r. Long time fan of his work. Truly one of the more talented writers on this site. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 23:42 Feb 27)
• For. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:10, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Mordillo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +20 Jewish conspiracies

• Nom + For. I suddenly noticed that Mordillo had not won this yet. Give it to him. Now. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:29, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• For. Unusually for me, I was tempted to self-for this month, but saw sense - I'm forever seeing Mr Dillo around, tidying, deleting, banning, making bits and pieces work better and generally helping to keep this place ticking over as smoothly as it can. He's damn good, and he's funny and approachable too. Give him this award. The end. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Jewish For--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 23:21, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Epic for not only does he help this site so much, he also does it in a friendly way, so everyone's happy. Let's make it the second Jew UotM in a row xD --~Fag x FS 13:49, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
• F♥r. He hasn't won this yet? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 23:00 3 Feb, 2008)
• SHOMER FUCKING SHABBOS! -RAHB 07:15, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
• For. Antisemitism. The only explanation for why he hasn't won this. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 13:39, Feb. 5, 2008

I fucking knew it! Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 13:52, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

• For. Was going to make a skin related joke, but decided against it... MrN  Fork you! 23:34, Feb 10
• For I have no other choice. --Charitwo^Talk 00:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
• Oy Vey, that is.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:11, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
• More dillos, please! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:37, Feb 11
• For The more the better. --Uncognito 06:23, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Forty Mo tl:dr My vote is for Mordillo Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
• Hard worker, nice guy, fairly decent dancer. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• Jew Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 10:53, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Strong For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
• Aitz Chaim He! --THINKER 16:07, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

err...you just referred to me as a woman... Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 18:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

You aren't? Who have I been masturbating to all this time!??! --THINKER 18:54, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

TMI Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 19:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Hey man, they were (supposedly) your pictures, pal.. --THINKER 19:17, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Honestly, I thought that Mordillo said TIM, which of course presented more questions. I solved this problem by doing something else. The end.-23:24, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

• For. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
• Cabal. — Sir Manticore 03:08, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
• For. How has he not got this yet? –—Hv (talk) 28/02 20:21

Count of Monkey Crisco (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2

• Nom & For . I saw this guy a few weeks ago on recentchanges adding categories to images. Then I saw him the next day, and the next, so I decided to check his contributions. I saw a trend spanning months that contained heavy maintenance to improve the site, much like what MadMax is famous for. If you haven't seen him around, check his contributions to see what I'm talking about. Sure, he's not a "publicly known" user, but his contributions speak for themselves. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:38, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• For. Holy shit, look at his contribs. That's commitment. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:31, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Roman Dog Bird (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• N - he didn't get this already? Wow--Æ 00:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Pointless for. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:20, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• N - does fantastic work at Pee Review, as well as VFD and QVFD, UN:BP--Æ 00:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• For. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:44, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Comment. I'd be more than happy to vote for him next month, as he's very active and helpful and all that bullshit, but I think this month belongs to the Jews. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF (@ 17:15 Feb 26)

Charitwo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• N runner up in last month's competiton and he needs recognition --Æ 00:42, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

March

NOTM

TheMillington (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• for definitely a useful n00b. wrote a great article on Poke a Communist Day

Mightydandylion (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +9

• N♥m && f♥r. My new favorite noob. He's so helpful over at Pee Reviews, writes some great articles, (one of which is up at VFH) and is active all over the site. I don't see there being any other choice. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:20 Mar 1
• Agreed, for. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 18:22, Mar 1
  • Comment - I'll wait a week or two to see what the competition is like before making up my mind about my vote... -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 18:41, 1 Mar
• For. Love his work on Pee Review. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:29, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• DIG When I respect a man's vocabulary, I think that speaks volumes. Oh, and he's another one of THINKER's n00b army, and I only take the best and brightest. Vote for this gentleman. --THINKER 16:06, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Against Having read the users The Man: A Primer and Something of a Call to Action I am underwhelmed. If it can be improved by the end of the month I may change my vote, but as of now I can't vote for the user Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:54, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• For. Helpful, polite, thoroughly decent and seems to be settling in nicely. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 21:32, Mar 18
• For. Looks like his guy has a great future at Uncyc. MrN  Fork you! 23:59, Mar 18
• For Per the first half of Thinker's statement. -RAHB 03:21, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
• For He's excellent. Schmat-a!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:24, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
• For NotM this month, and RotM next month, being the most productive reviewer on site who hasn't won it yet (assuming SysRq wins this month). A great talent by the looks of it. –—Hv (talk) 26/03 14:15
• F☭R

Tattaglia (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3

• Nom & For - He's my new favorite n00b. Seriously, you have got to check out Hostage Situation, that article he wrote was funny. --Nekami 15:50, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• For- Just read HS, you're right, Nekami, hilarious!!-XOXOXO, Love ya! Sk8R Grl UnSis Dude Slut! 19:13, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
• Tattaglia is hilarious! Seriously read his articles! - Praveen

UOTM

Heerenveen (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom Since he's been back, he has fast gotten back into the groove, QVFDing pages just as fast as I can delete them. On for a solid amount of time every day, he's a keeper too.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:48, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
• Most definitely next month. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:02, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4

• N♥m && f♥r. Didn't win it last month, here's to another shot. Only reason I didn't vote for him last month was because that Hebrew was up. I hope UU wins this month, he's extremely helpful around the site, and he really stepped up to the plate with Pee Reviews after Cajek's mysterious disappearance. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:07 Mar 1
• For /me Snowboards into the voting.. UU is one of the most useful and probably the most friendly and courteous chap it's been my fortune to encounter at Uncyc. Following on from the sudden __NOCAJEK__, and my switch to the more poopy end of the market, he has been holding the fort at Pee Review, as well as providing useful input all over the place. Some of his comments in the forums genuinely make me laugh out loud, and why he does not write more I have no Idea. MrN  Fork you! 13:44, Mar 2
• FOR Very helpful pee reviews, genuinely friendly, and easy to work with. I vote for UNDER USER!!! Javascap 14:58, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
• For. –—Hv (talk) 6/03 18:20
• NM Mext Nonth --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:31, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment UU is fast becoming UotM's So So. That means he will win eventually.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
• For Next Month I think he's swell. --OptyC Sucks! CUN 14:42, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

MrN9000 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +22 thousand

• Nom + For. This guy's a keeper. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:29, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Strong For Extra special, totally delicious, and absolutely British. All three things that I don't dislike. Plus the fact that he's a really useful helper to have around, always been a better poopsmith than me. In short, he makes most of us look bad. That's why he's got my vote.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• EPIC for as per every time I've ever voted for him on anything. --User:Fag/sig2 22:18, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Yep. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:20, Mar 1
• For. Helpful, diligent, always around (unless he's snowboarding) and generally an asset to the site. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:36, Mar 2
• VForD He virtually runs VFD and is a helpful guy. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:12, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
• Dig He's like V Week, only slower. And since V Week is evil, I sincerely appreciate MrN. --THINKER 14:45, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
• For Him and his ever-enthusiastic helpings out. -RAHB 07:03, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• For - He does pretty much what I was doing a year ago. Except that he's better. And he has friends. /me cries. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:54, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
• For - What can I say, thanks to him, I'm NotM. /me hugs Cs1987 there, there, it's going to be alright... ;) -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 10:01, 6 Mar
• For Winna right here --Orange Geuce Yum! 18:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
• For, I remember the first time he asked me if I could give him a job as my personal butler. Then he picked up some kind of shovel, and started doing something to VFD. I'm not really sure what I'm talking about here, but, rest assured, its probably a metaphor. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:01, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment - Math apparently isn't someone's strong point... :P -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:23, 9 Mar
• For, always doing good stuff. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 23:01, Mar 11
• Hell yes - He does fantastic work over on VFD and is really helping clear out those crap stubs (Bonner) (Talk) Mar 12, 07:58
• Five He's over 9000 --Charitwo^Talk 03:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
• Hell. yes.   Le Cejak • <-> Mar 26 (23:09)
• The best thing to come out of Bristol since.....shit, what has ever come out of Bristol before? -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

Hea! Fags (tobacco I mean), chocolate and slaves! What more do you want??? Dam scousers... MrN  Fork you! 23:27, Mar 26

• For epic similarities. --MNM5150^{Talk Dirty To Me} _Failings 03:16, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
• F☭R
• For Mr. N has been very helpful and friendly to this noob. --OptyC Sucks! CUN 14:44, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• For - Everyone else is doing it. It's a new fad! --AAA! (AAAA) 12:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
• It's a new trend. ~ 20:33, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

SysRq (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• Nom & For SysRq has been helping me get the hang of this site, and for that, he gets a big 2 thumbs up from this n00b. --Sk8R Grl 19:12, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• FutureFag. For many many reasons. --User:Fag/sig2 20:54, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• For But if he wont adopt me, ill tak it back. he seems pretty kewl. i saw a pic of him and hez pretty hot 2 lol LuvMuffin 02:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Cool and Sexy Admins IP (most recently 65.173.104.12 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser))

Score: +1

• Nom and For This guy makes me smile like nobody else. Classic pieces like I've heard how SEXY, cool the ADMINS are. WHEN WILL THEY MAKE A "ADMINS GONW WILD" TAPE ?!, How do I compliment the Admins ? Or is that a insult ? boost morale more than a thousand great articles. CaSAIP also deserves credit for making great progress - while his earlier works indicated a certain dubiousness (Rumors: Are the Admins here really Sexy ?, Someone said the Admins are cool and sexy. Is this true ?, Just seen question. Is it REALLY true you Admins are really cool and sexy ?), he has obviously overcome that struggle and accepted the fact that Uncyc admins are indeed cool, sexy and helpful. Bonus points for positing (correctly) that Bureaucrats can make and break admins at will. —rc (t) 20:59, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
  • He really oughta have his own forum-category (Category:CaSAIP?). We should also put spaces before all our question marks, in his honor. (See what I mean ? ) - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:10, Mar 11
    • Are we going to start now ? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 21:49 Mar 13
      • Did you ask TKF ? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:42, Mar 14
        • Socratic Method much ?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
          • TKF ? Is he Sexy ? And Cool ? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 01:02 Mar 14
            • Isn't this common knowledge ? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 13:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
              • What must I do to become sexy and cool without the responsibility of being a sysop ? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:17 Mar 26

WOTM

DJ Irreverent (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• Nom & For - He may be new, but his material makes me laugh. --Nekami 11:16, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
• Comment Wow... I'm honoured. The others deserve it more though --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:16, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• We laugh with him sometimes, but mostly at him. Vampiregirl
• Comment I will so vote for this guy once TKFeck wins this month or next. He totally deserves it, just a little later. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:20, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• FutureF♥r. Next month, this month belongs to Mordillo no matter what Squiggle says. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 16:25 Mar 6
• Deserving Despite having plagiarized some UnNewses, this guy still has a knack for writing gud laffs.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 11:05, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +8

• Nom and for Surprisingly, this guy hasn't won this yet. Go figure. He co-wrote the excellent Pillow fighting, wrote the very funny Cream of the Crap winner Sergei Rachmaninoff, and the hilarious HowTo:Play Russian Roulette, to name just a few. He deserves to win, for definitely. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:19, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• For. Having not made any promises last month, I feel TKF is an excetional writing talent and, like Squiggle, am surprised he didn't win this around September last year-ish. –—Hv (talk) 1/03 21:30
• For. I decided to not be lazy for once and vote for something deserving. Zombieninja 00:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
• Fogainstain. Yeah, I support not supporting the abstaining from voting for this user. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 03:12, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• For HowTo:Play Russian Roulette really persuaded me. I loved that article.--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• TKF power, activate! - UnIdiot | Talk? | Theme - 01:12, Mar 5
• For --THE 20:13, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
• I always vote for the other Jew. ~ 09:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
• Next Month 4 Sure --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:17, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Mordillo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +19 more 'dillos

• Nom and Big ol' For Mordillo definitely deserves this. Polish Inquisition, Truthful Vending GmbH, Jewish Holidays, HowTo:Prevent your car radio from being stolen, The Porchesian Holocaust, My Journeys with the GPS, HowTo:Learn Hebrew all rocked. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• For. Damn straight, dagnabit. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:51, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• For. Ooh, another tough choice. But having come so close to voting Mordillo last month, I have to do it this month. Love his work. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:06, Mar 1
• For, as per my vote last month -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:39, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• F♥r. I promised last month. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:13 Mar 1
• For. As much as I want to vote for my ailing self out of self-pity, I also promised last month. This vote ought to end that whole "promised last month" brigade. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:25, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
• Mordillo Hey gramps! But yes, awesome writer.   Le Cejak • <-> Mar 3 (14:19)
• Obviously. — Sir Wehp! (t!) (c!) — 02:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• For And Shomer Shabbos. But also, this month's is a very tough decision. TKF, you get this next month for sure. -RAHB 06:54, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• For. Again. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:51, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
• For. Really tough call this month, but as history has shown time and time again, Jews always win... --So So 07:35, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: TKF is also Jewish, I think. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 11:19, Mar 7
    • Yeah. Renounce and replace your vote in the name of Y_weh! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:33, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
      • Uh, well Mordillo seems more flamboyantly Jewish in his writing. If TKF writes UnBooks:Talmud II:Electric Boogaloo this month I may reconsider... --So So 07:00, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
        • I am seriously considering doing that. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
• IV Kakun  nukaK 17:48, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
• For - Sabba gets this lucky 13th vote... :P -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 10:46, 10 Mar
• For. Lansky own Kuba. -- herr doktor needsAbrain  [scream!] 02:23, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

I cannot tell you enough how flattered I am that you came back from the dead to vote for me :) ~ 09:40, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

• Let's hear it for the Jews! By which I mean for. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  20:28, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
• Fag. What, no 'dildo jokes? --User:Fag/sig2 20:50, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Hey Fag, guess what? ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 21:50 Mar 13
• For Um... Well, you get the idea. MrN  Fork you! 00:06, Mar 19
• ForHelped with my signature and I've taken to stealing stuff from his userpage --Sycamore (Talk) 14:41, 21 March 2008 (UTC).
• For hitting it old skool. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• Four Yes.--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 19:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
• F☭R

April

WotM

Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 17KF

• Nom+for - He done 'rit some good stuffs. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:00, Apr 1
• Super Dooper Strong For Boy is this man good at writing and admining-ing. I promised last month so... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 03:41, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment If Dr. S had not been nominated, then I would definitely vote for TKF. TKF nommed me in... whenever, and is also a prolific writer. I hope I get the chance to vote for him before he gets it!   Le Cejak • <Apr 01, 2008 [3:45]>
    • Just whorin' off his many, many good articles. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 09:41, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• Jew got my vote. ~ 05:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• For. Another really tough choice this month, and I certainly wouldn't object if Skullthumper won this. But my vote goes to TKF, partly because he's been unlucky to miss out several times now, partly because of some awesome articles, and partly because of his eyes. They're so deep and soulful. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:35, Apr 1
• Having done about a bazillion Pees for him last month, and with all of those articles being brilliant, strong for. His earlier articles speak for themsleves really. Also, as per last month. –—Hv (talk) 1/04 18:53
• Having been the first one to nominate him for this award many moons ago, I stand by my love for him. For-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:27, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• For - Hard choice; Dr Skullthumper definitely gets my vote next time. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:09, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• For. Absolutely awesome. Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 16:49, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• For, because TKF has the best drugs. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  22:28, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• Dig --THINKER 16:01, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• Against. Because he didn't write UnBooks:Talmud II:Electric Boogaloo. Or UnBooks:Talmud III:Recircumcised. Or Uncyclopedia Department of Tourism. Oh wait, he did write that one. Strong Frog. --So So 07:43, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
• For It is literally scary that this guy hasn't won this yet. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• For. He needs this. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 01:28, Apr 9
• Should have won it months ago before he went shit ;). For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For --HonestUser 10:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• For HowTo:Play Russian Roulette. Nuff said. --Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:02, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
• Ye gods, TKF, I remember when you were whining in IRC about me getting 'shamed before you. Now look at yer. Amazing stuff, this guy's done. For. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 03:03 Apr 29, 2008

Cap'n Ben (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nomination but currently withholding my vote. Wow... Cap'n Ben. He's always been one of my favorite writers on the site, and has already established himself among the greatest many months ago. But very recently, he's stepped up again, writing new gems like Al Capone, All of the Above, and HowTo:Show your appreciation for the band Led Zeppelin. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:32, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Errr...already got WotM in the past...~ 05:38, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

No rule against a second win. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:19, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

• Not a no, not a yes As the good Cap'n knows, I greatly admire his work. However, as long as there are fresh nominees to win the award (which there are), it should go to them.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:40, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the nomination, Froggy, but after thinking about this, I'm with Ljlego. While it would be nice to win now that there are more than three people voting, it's probably better that someone else has a go. I'm not sure if I can withdraw from the running, but if I can then I do. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Skullthumper (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +6 M.D.s on meds

• Nomination. Also one of my favorite writers, whom I've been watching since his very first stellar creation Kitchen Sink, a feature he whipped up as his first contribution. Sadly, due to inactivity, he has been unable to rightfully claim this award, but fear not! for he has started writing again, and with his reemergence of activity comes this nomination. Keep on truckin' Dr. S! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:37, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Yes. Skullthumper is consistently funny. A dynamic sense of humor and a good personality set Skull up for a big win come November May.   Le Cejak • <Apr 01, 2008 [1:51]>
• Next Month I promised TKF. Dr Skullthumper Definitely deserves this though. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 04:00, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Yersh - Kitchen sink and Ode to the Monotony of Life are two of my favourite articles here! --Knucmo2 19:00, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
• No. Not next month. Not two months from now. NOW. Do it NOW. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 19:12 Apr 5
• For, I'm sure he could write a better vote reason than this. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:28, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
• Indeed! An excellent Author with an excellent track record.Muzak 01:01, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
• For He wrote the "Best article I've ever read." Seriously, Dr. S, I made that T-shirt I said I was going to make. It says "Vote For Monotony." It's not even up for any sort of voting anymore. On a side note, Dr. S consistently puts out hilarious stuff. On a side side note, TKF really should get this award. But Dr. S is edging him out in my personal preference for now. -RAHB 06:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

NotM

YesTimeToEdit (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: Y18sTimeToVote

YTTE's back in the race -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:03, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

• Uh oh... believe it or not, but looking back into this guy's contribs, his first contrib was from February 26th. He's ineligible! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:38, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
  • IT TOOK YOU THIS LONG TO TELL US THAT?! Fuck, I don't care. I move to a motion that he be eligible anyways since he's already gotten so many votes. The point of NotM is not how well known you are in the first month of your Uncyc career, it's more about any new user who is helpful and I think YTTE deserves better than to have this taken away from him. He's done a bang-up job, and in my opinion is one of the more impressive noobs I've seen. Let's not ruin this for him, yeh? One exception couldn't hurt. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 17:45 Apr 26

It would hurt, any exception would allow anyone to win n00b of the month and automaticly become comander. Except for Rcmurphy. Besides, YesTimeToEdit can win many more awards such as UOTM and WOTM, so it ain't the end of the world. And if he's been here for say, two or three months. He certainly has experience. That's why I care. --User:The Improver/sig18:40, Apr 26 2008 (UTC)

See, and I agree with you that it would possibly hurt the integrity of NotM. See the talk page. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:57 Apr 26

• • I agree with both of you. But unless we make the time limit 2 months (which I would definitely agree with), there can only be one winner. This has happened before: two good contenders both deserving of the award. Let's give it to both of them.   Le Cejak • <Apr 26, 2008 [18:59]>

I like that idea too. Let's take it up on the talk page and if no one has any objection to it I say they both get it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 19:07 Apr 26

• Nomenfore A very nice Noob, deserves my vote --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:06, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

YeTTiE? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh I see, with the "e" of "Yes" and the "i" of "time" (ooh that sounds philosophical) you can create yettie....I'm talking here, FAR TOO MUCH! - 03:23 4 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

• Yes time to vote. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:02, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Yes. Already writing, has done some pretty good stuff around the site. Proactive, funny, not a dog turd. Three things I look for in a NotM nominee. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:43 Apr 1
• Uv Course Very good job, YTTE.   Le Cejak • <Apr 02, 2008 [12:33]>
• Oh!I can vote for myself apparently, well, oh is there meant to be a 4 instead of an "e" in the title thingy? Anyway... Thanks for the nom! - 01:39 2 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

  Well, sort of. There was before your vote. You should have changed it to a 5, I've changed it to a 6 - it's a zany way of doing the scoring. Woo! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:46, Apr 2

Oh right...zany. And don't worry Cajek has alerted me to the badness of whoring! I'm changing my ways, promise! - 02:13 2 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Zany indeed, and who came up with that? /me checks the history Oh yeah, I did. =D ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:20 Apr 2

Well good for you, by the way, and I know this hasn't really got anything to do with anything, but are you still doing the pee for me? - 11:31 2 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

CHICKUH CHICKUH YEEEEEUUH!!! ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:12 Apr 2

• For. Although this could change if the whoring of this nom I've seen reaches my talk page... --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 12:46, Apr 2
• Ehhh.... I mean, he's already taken to the site really well AND begun to understand the wiki's oldest profession...Big For.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 19:16, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you Ljlego, my kneecaps are yours to split... - 09:14 2 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

• Nobody touches my Noob's kneecaps. They are mine to split. ~ 13:52, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Woot! Yay, go daddy! :D - 03:20 4 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

• For, for taking the time to say hi to me, and being the first person to whore themselves on my talkpage. ☯ 21:49, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry to keep commenting/talking here but I just have to say this relating to whoring on your talkpage: cough, splutter, pah, ahem, splutter some more, ME? Now I promise to myself that I will never talk on here again! - 10:55 4 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

• Normally I wait until the end of the month for NotM. However, I'm breaking that policy this month for unknown reasons. For, easily the best noob on the site right now, and his articles are good. Plus, he already has the mindset of an older Uncyclopedian. –—Hv (talk) 7/04 16:45
  • It seems that all of Mordillo's noobs end up picking up on it rather quickly. I wonder why that is.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• For. Sound man, that YTTE. Tkotse 19:10, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
• For He's amazing (he didn't tell me to say that). For NOT splitting my kneecaps, and because he likes cheese, the other yellow meat (he does, he really does). This man truly deserves to be N00blet of the Month! --Stat talk 00:40, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• For. VGD >=3 16:02, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:50, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Vicarious For Since I'll never have the chance to be NotM, I'll vote for this guy. Not just because he's the best choice, but mainly because he's the only choice. Plus he owes me $20. -OptyC Sucks! CUN 00:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

$20? I do? - 08:29 12 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

• FOR! • nyp 09:59, 20 April 2008
• For. I thoroughly appreciate an approachable, friendly, and helpful Uncyclopedian. Also, YesTimeToEdit continues to write good articles. Also! YesTimeToEdit's recent review was excellent. Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 14:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• For again   Le Cejak • <Apr 27, 2008 [22:31]>
• 4. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:51, Apr 27

The Improver (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3.5

• Nom From what I can see, he's eligible, and I feel he at least deserves a nom here. He's been working on some not bad articles, and pee reviewing, and is a generally nice guy. He also references marijuana on his user page. That makes him cool. -RAHB 22:48, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
• Great guy. Unfortunately, YTTE already has my vote. They're both great NotM candidates and I'd love to see them both win. This guy has made himself very useful (hence the name) and I look forward to what else he has to offer Uncyc. Perhaps he will see a UotM in the future if he keeps up this pace. sirsysrq @ 01:25 Apr 22
• As per Sysrq. VGD >=3 00:09, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Comment. Indeed, it's a shame he's come up against such strong competition this month, but if the keeps it up, I'm sure chances for other awards will present themselves. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 18:11, Apr 24
• For. Deserves some recognition, I think, even if he doesn't have much of a chance, at this point. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:14, Apr 26
• For since the other guy couldn't make it -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:39, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• For YTTE is, unfortunately, ineligable. Good job on that, Frogz!   Le Cejak • <Apr 26, 2008 [17:48]>
• Changing my Vote This guy seems more n00bish. --B4tm4n 06:23, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• For --85.85.77.77 07:39, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Turns out this is our old friend NXWave. ~ 19:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Another NXWave? Shoulda known. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:22 Apr 27

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9 really original ideas

• Nom. YesTimeToEdit needs competition, and who better to provide that than Rcmurphy, n00biest of the n00? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 13:07, Apr 2
• <insert Zombiebaron styled vote here> -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• The n00b since time immemorial (fuck that if it isn't correct grammar) --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:28, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
• Wow for a noob, he sure isn't one!   Le Cejak • <Apr 12, 2008 [13:21]>
• Got my vote --SilveryMinnow 06:29, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
• Not very active, but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• Him draws goodly. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 14:27, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• 1234 --Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 17:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• For --B4tm4n 21:37, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• Strong For --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
• Against as per Zombiebaron. Trust me, he'd want it this way. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 01:20, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• For This guy is a guy. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 02:57, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• For Seems like a better guy. --HonestUser 10:37, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• Sure --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:12, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• For Well, It looks like I won't be winning this award this month or next month. So let's break his loosing streak. --User:The Improver/sig19:09, Apr 27 2008 (UTC) I guess his votes don't count anymore... - 11:19 28 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
• For He's the only eligible candidate we've got this month. So far. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:41, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
• Zombiebaron. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 23:31, Apr 27
• For. I like the cut of his jib. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:29, 28 Apr 2008

A couple of people have voted twice, that isn't allowed, is it? I think... - 11:23 28 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

You'd be surprised what is allowed under the "voting for Rcmurphy" charter of 1861. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:27, Apr 28

Eh...why would you want animal sex after voting for Rcmurphy? That doesn't make sense... - 12:00 28 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

UotM

Heerenveen (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9renveen

• Nom + For as per last month. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:42, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• For Dude . . . I called him a tank. What else is there to say?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:34, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• For. Outstanding on reviews, diligent on Recent Changes (he's beaten me to more reverts than I care to consider) and generally helpful and top notch. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:29, Apr 1
• For - We've got some seriously deserving nominees this month, but this guy just wins it for me. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• For - This guy puts stuff on QVFD before I can even load the page. VGD >=3 20:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• For, a really helpful and consitent contibuter to the site in the time I've been here--Sycamore (Talk) 14:15, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• Dig I've always been partial to his little squiggly sigs.. --THINKER 16:03, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
• For, in his year and two months of userhood he has been a shiny star of helpfulness. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:24, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
• For Woooooo shiiiiny star of helpfulneeeeeEEeEEeEesssss! -RAHB 06:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 14

• Nom & Floor Seriously, this guy has deserved this for ages, his work on Pee is spectacular and he helps keep the site running behind the scenes. A great asset to the site and a great guy in general. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 03:53, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• Gasp UU doesn't have U:U of the month yet?? dear god, give it to him!   Le Cejak • <Apr 01, 2008 [3:57]>
• FORE! I will vote for him AGAIN because I honestly believe he deserves this reward. Go UU! Warm Regards, Javascap
• For He's swell. Seriously, he's a helpful and funny guy. --OptyC Sucks! CUN 18:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• For UU has done over 100 Pee Reviews and makes a huge contribution to Pee review in various other ways. He also writes funny articles, votes on VFH and VFD, contributes in an amusing manor on talk pages and in forums, reverts vandals, welcomes new users and I have NEVER seen UU being in the slightest bit confrontational or unpleasant in anyway. The complete Uncyclopedian. MrN  Fork you! 18:37, Apr 1
• For. Can't put it any better than MrN just has. Besides, he's really the only good choice this month, what with Cajek was inactive for most of March. A brilliant role model and Uncyclopedian. –—Hv (talk) 1/04 18:51
• F♥r. I'll vote for him for however many months I have to. But he's deserved this for a long time. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:22 Apr 1
• Shit I feel like a tool for not having voted for him. I'll give him a flattering comment instead. UU, U make my heart sing. No, but seriously, the guy's an incredible user, also a tank, and a pretty funny guy given half a chance.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:47, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
  • This is the So So situation all over again! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:48, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• For As per MrN 9000 so lucidly explained. Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 16:45, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
• 4 Seriously, Pee Review would be dead without UU - oh look, it's Madmikeuk ~ { talk - contrib } 14:42, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
• For...why? Because Cajek told me so! No, but apart from that, I've re-decided, the beforementioned user (whom I originally voted for) doesn't have a hope in hell of winning and I don't want to throw my vote away, but also I agree that Peeing would be dead without UU, and recently he did me a very nice one. <Insert the rest of my reasons and logic from my brain, it's under the "UotM, Cajek UU stuff" file> - 03:49 8 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
• For I would be voting Hereveen, but aftrer the last couple of mornings monotering recent changes, this guy is definitly more worthy.--Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 14:31, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

• I just noticed i never casted a vote. --Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 18:33, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

• For True fact: I'm actually UU's sockpuppet. He's been having me write stupid articles and make little fixes across the wiki so I look legit enough to pass for a real user. All of that just for this one vote. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:27, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
  • I'll have to try that one out. ;) sirsysrq @ 16:12 Apr 19
• For --HonestUser 10:34, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Cajek (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2 people who should've voted for UNDER USER

• Nom & For just being a good guy. --The Improver 01:55, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• AUU After User:Under user, sorry :) --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 03:58, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
• FuturePhor even though he really should have gotten this before the __NOCAJEK__. However, to his credit, he's making a great comeback. At this point, I'm tempted to put him up for WotM over UotM. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:57 Apr 1
  • He already won.. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
    • I haven't already won UotM, froggy! Oh whatever, doesn't matter.   Le Cejak • <Apr 02, 2008 [15:42]>
• Torn... Hmm....I was really torn between Cajek, here, and Under User, but since Cajek is a great guy (...guy, I think...) and he hasn't got as many votes, well ya' know. Also what's happened to the scoring thingy mabob?? - 04:37 4 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee! I um, sort of withdraw my vote, see above (UU section). - 03:50 8 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
  • ... there we go, there's the scoring thing, hope that it was meant to not be there. - 04:39 4 AprilSir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
• forshizzleTizzonz of teh grizeatest workzorz!!1!!!!!!oneoneoneQQQQ Jesus Hates You. 23:17, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
• For - I seriously <3 Cajek. --IHeartCajek 14:19, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
  • commence eye rolling.   Le Cejak • <Apr 11, 2008 [14:36]>

Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom Sheep don't moo but this guy is alright. --Charitwo^Talk 03:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

May

UotM

Heerenveen (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +18 tanks

• Nom & for. Heerenveen is awesome. Reverting, QVFDing, voting, writing, reviewing, friendly helping, you name it, he does it. Seriously deserving of your vote. VOTE HV! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:13, May 1
• For Yes. As someone says, "Heerenveen is no asshat. He's my best friend. I love him."   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [13:21]>
• For - Not justification or explantion needed:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 13:41, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Ridiculously strong for. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 18:05 May 01, 2008
• For -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:58, 1 May
• Forizzle Whereas I am a pathetic excuse for a user/admin, only being arsed to do stuff occasionally, Heerenveen is a tank. A TANK I tellz ya~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 19:16, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Utmost For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• MEGA FOR This man is.. is.. IS.. a man --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:44, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• For -RAHB 23:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• For - What UU said below about Ljlego. - 10:41 3 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
• For, so that all you lazybones regular users can see that to get this, all you need to do is get a couple of ICU tags and some constructive criticism handy, and hit newpages. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 03:48, May 4
• Absolutely! As much as I'd love to win, this revert-stealing bastard truly gives me a run for my money. :) — Sir Manticore 08:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
• For Well, despite my best efforts to give HV some opposition this month he's kicking arse at such a rate I just can't withhold my vote any longer. Awesome HV. Rock does not say enough, HV is a diamond. MrN  Fork you! 11:15, May 11
• For - My favourite Dutch Premier League team. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:59, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• For Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog| 06:01, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• For Deserves it. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:54, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
• For • nyp 13:43, 27 May 2008
• For. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 05:08, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Ljlego (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2 missing pieces

• Nom Hmm, looks like HV is making a dash for it already this month... Let's spice things up a little. MrN  Fork you! 18:50, May 1
• sFor. Do I really need a reason with him? –—Hv (talk) 1/05 19:03
• Zombiebaron – Oh come on guys. Can't you wait until the second of the month before spilling your votes all over the place? Heerenveen is a wonderful guy, don't get me wrong. TheLedBalloon is too. And I'm sure the guy who gets nominated two days from now, who won't have a hope in hell of winning this month, will deserve UotM too. But Ljlego deserves it more. I could probably tell you why too, but my mere words cannot do this guy justice. So. Yeah. If you don't know what I'm talking about, look at his contributions. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:56, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Zombiebaron delivers a convincing response as ever. Next month. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 14:49, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: I look at Lj's contributions. I think we all know what he does around here. And he's ace. He's also won just about every "... of the month" award on this site, and he's an admin. I think he knows his contributions are recognised and appreciated. Same for Led. Hv, on the other hand, has been here 15 months, put in a lot of hard, useful work, and so far has just RotM to show for his efforts. He should have won this last month (I know, ZB always seems to make a comment about people saying that in these kind of votes, but I honestly mean it). Heerenveen is ace, and deserves this award. I'm sure Lj can wait a little longer for this - give him time to clear space in his bulging trophy cabinet! ;-) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:11, May 2

TheLedBalloon (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4 Hindenbergs

• Nom I'm talking really spicy. MrN  Fork you! 18:50, May 1
• F♥r. TLB...what a guy. He's done so much for the site in the last month that I think this time it needs to go to him. I mean, forrealz, gize. Only thing bad about him is that he tuuk mah ipod!!! ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 19:02 May 1
• EPIC WIN For Being a great helper to pathetic noobs like me. --SWJS 03:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
• Amen to what the guy above me just said. ~ NEZLR 18:18, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Manticore (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1 janitors

• Nom. I'm still voting Lj, but I feel Manticore more than deserves a nom. He'd been working hard beforehand as a janitor, but since he's been fully opped he's been insanely good with said tools. Plus, I didn't think we had enough admins nommed already. —– Sir Hv » | Talk | Contribs | KUN | UotM | RotM | VFH | Kidney | 11/05 08:51

  OMG me! I should check these pages more often... — Sir Manticore 08:56, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

• FOR! Yes, for, not four or for four or... --User:Jack Phoenix/sig 11:21, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
• Comment Oh my God, who to vote for? Manticore is insanely deserving, as is Lj, as is Hv (but not you, Led, fucking worthless, I swear). I'm keeping my vote for Hv this month, but god dammit, Manticore is getting this next month, I do solemnly vow. -RAHB 20:55, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

66.102.80.212 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom Secretly Chronarion, no doubt. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 18:51, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
  • I'm pretty sure Chronarion would have the balls to use his name at his own wiki (well, it's his in spirit).~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 19:09, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
  • (rolls eyes) Looks like carlb to me. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 19:10 May 04, 2008
  • I remember this guy. He gave me a good laugh when he visited Central to whine. — Sir Manticore 11:23, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
    • lolstalking - it probably is Carl. — Sir Manticore 11:33, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

96.241.31.73 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom This is actually Chronarion. I checked. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 23:39 May 4

127.0.0.1 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser)

Score: o

• Nom NO! This is CLEARLY Chronarion. I got an e-mail confirmation from him with this IP. - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 02:36, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

NotM

Joe9320 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom This noob tried to nom himself - what a noob! --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:16, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
• It's time to me to die another day. I am the biggest noob. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Joe9320 (talk • contribs)
  • Self-noms aren't allowed. - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 14:14, May 10

Hyperbole (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: Holy crap! Look at that gigantic 11!

• Nom and 4 This guy has taken to here like a fish to water, voting on stuff, writing stuff, doing stuff, stuffing stuff. A true NotM. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:05, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
• For great joostice.   Le Cejak • <May 11, 2008 [12:25]> Hyperbole is great, but he doesn't need my vote this month. See Cheapinitreal, below.   Le Cejak • <May 15, 2008 [1:52]>
• 4 - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 14:07, May 11
• For - Among other things I really don't want Rcmurphy to win NotM, but this guy has been putting some effort in, which is good... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by YesTimeToEdit (talk • contribs)

Oh i feel so ashamed of myself, I can't believe I didn't sign my thingy! I feel I've I've soiled myself...- 16:47 11 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

I'm sorry Hyperbole, but I have to change my vote! Read below... - 19:44 22 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

• For. Didn't know he was even a noob! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:22, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
• For for all the stuff... MrN  Fork you! 16:25, May 11
• For - Anyone but Rcmurphy. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:13, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• For. First n00b I've personally liked since MrN, and also the cause of my longest Pee Review on record. Also, passed my initial suspicions of being NXWave (and evidently somebody else's, as per TKF's nom of rcmurphy). Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:34, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
• For - Sorry about my brief wikibreak; work's been grueling. I'll be back in top form in a couple days. Many thanks to all of you for the nomination and votes! --Hyperbole 18:34, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• For Noticed him around PEE and he seems to be putting in a lot of effort. Thumbs up. Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog| 06:07, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• For - I seriously didn't realized he was a noob. Seems to be doing good stuffs. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 21:14, May 21
• Strong For Hyperbole is the best user to ever exist ever.-~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 21:21, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• Phor, as per Ljlego. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 19:04 May 22
• For :-) - --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 20:56, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Cheapinitreal (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: Cheapinitplus 15

• NMFR Seeing as the rest of this month's candidates aren't real candidates, I offer up this fully eligible and competent one. He's not exactly the site's prodigy quite yet, but he's been putting a lot of work into some original articles, and is very enthusiastic to contribute solid input into the site (unlike that worthless Rcmurphy guy...seriously, what a noob). -RAHB 08:08, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
• For. I'm always up for real candidates.   Le Cejak • <May 10, 2008 [14:17]> Although I like Cheapinitreal, Hyperbole is someone I've actually run into doing stuff.   Le Cejak • <May 11, 2008 [12:25]> Changing my vote back. Although I would like to see one of these noobs get a VFH within the month, Cheapinitreal is my choice. Funny writer, funny man, etc. etc.   Le Cejak • <May 15, 2008 [1:52]>

• Good to have a nice clean fight this month --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:30, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

• Noobs are good -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:38, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
• For yes, I am an old dirty whore and thanks for the nom and votes all! --Cheapinitreal 15:50, 10 May 2008 (UTC
• For. W00t noob o' teh munth! - wait, wait, omg IT'S A TARP!!!!! HaLoGuY007 02:18, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
• Still in favor of and still not a sock puppet. --Ray Bob McCobb 23:08, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
• For Yeah... This guy might be the better n00b. --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 05:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
• For, though I was impressed by both. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 21/05 18:51
• For --B4tm4n 18:55, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• For he is a n00b though. --HonestUser 19:24, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
• For. Has been doing some really awesome stuff, but it's so close between Cheap and Hyperbole! I've been swayed slightly to this side, but Hyperbole, you're awesome too! - 19:44 22 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
• For Helped me out.--TuoDecaps 00:25, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
• Dig Kitty Porn made me laugh. Good on ya. --THINKER 04:24, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
• For. NotM is a terrible curse for those that "win" it, by the way. Moo ha-ha! My vote = #13. Coincidence? I think not! Again, moo ha-ha! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:09, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

  If you look at my user page, you'll see I am to be married in just a few weeks on Friday, June 13th. I fear no curses, just badgerinegooses! --- Cheapinitreal (talk) 06:16, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

  I'll revoke my vote if you don't show me a pic of your wife-to-be. And she better be hot, or I'll revoke my vote. Also. --THINKER 06:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

  US only picture I could find. I hate these machines.--- Cheapinitreal (talk) 07:15, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

  Dude, what do I keep telling you about image sizes man? Preferably with more than 5 pixels in them, hmmm? /me swats Cheapinitreal lightly across the nose) -RAHB 07:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

  Hmmm... I'll give it a preemptive Dig until a proper size image can be supplied. Vote stands...for now! --THINKER 13:42, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

• For. Hype's disappeared a little off the radar, Cheap's still going. And I like some of the stuff he's done. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 08:41, May 29
• F♥r. Changing my vote after reading Kitty Porn and realizing that Hype isn't here much anymore. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 13:51 May 29

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -1

• Nom + Against. That boy got robbed last month, but I really don't want him to rob Hyperbole (who has been confirmed to be not-NXWave) of this award. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Strong For Rcmurphy is a noob among noobs. He won Noob of the Year last year, and he has yet to be recognized for his monthly contributions to noobishness. Fnoodle is clearly a sockpuppet and ineligible; there's only one Rcmurphy!~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 15:41, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• For. Why not? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:42, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• For --Nothing 04:16, 6 May 2008 (UTC)

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• For • nyp 07:01, 9 May 2008

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• For --B4tm4n 16:06, 10 May 2008 (UTC)

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• For --HonestUser 06:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

*For what an effin' noob --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:14, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

• For --85.198.239.16 07:59, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• foar --Lolcat 15:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• For I think he's such a noob. --Qua 15:48, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• Abstain - I find many of the above votes suspicious. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 18:32, May. 12, 2008
• For --NarutoUzimaki 13:14, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• So-For He got the BBQ! --ILoveBBQ 20:37, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• For --121.184.107.206 22:48, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

  Suspicious Vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:01, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

• Strongly suspicious vote. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 15:38, 18 May 2008
• For o hai * Flumpa 22:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

  I declare myself to be a suspicious vote! * Flumpa 22:52, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +0

• Nom TKF is a newb. Look who he nominated for NotM, for instance.   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [12:54]>

Cajek (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom. Still acts like a noob despite being here for months. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 18:02 May 01, 2008

• Well, I still act like a noob even though I've been here for years... --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:36, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Fnoodle (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2 crazy robots (with awesome names)

• Nom + for. More edits than me already! And he never seems to get tired of doing tedious edits. Also, Fnoodle is an awesome name. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 18:02 May 01, 2008
• Technically eligible. Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 20:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• For -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:04, 1 May
• Strong Against - Sorry to ruin the fun and all but this award really should go to a proper n00b - isn't this award meant to encourage us n00bs to be more pro-active on Uncyclopedia? - 21:17 1 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Errr, there's no noobs nominated yet. Where's the harm? -OptyC Sucks! CUN00:38, 2 May

To my arm, it rhymes! Er, I dunno, but even still I feel... Er... Oh fine, then, go ahead and vote for him! - 06:45 2 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!

Wait, DJ here. So now we have to make robots to satisfy our our our our our owwrr oooowwrrrr SYSTEM FAILURE PANIC PANIC PANIC

Do bots even qualify as real Uncyclopedians? * Flumpa 22:50, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Dr. Skullthumper (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom. Of course, he might have have the most edits out of everyone here, but he did make that one thing right that one time with the robot. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

WotM

Dr. Skullthumper (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +24 Quacks

• Nom and Five. One of my favorite writers who has always been on the money when it comes to writing. When it has his name on it you can tell it is good. He deserves this more than words can describe \o/ \o_ _o_ _o/ \o/ --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 15:27, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Epic for. Skullthumper is no asshat, he's one of our best writers. I love his work. To coin a phrase. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 15:38, May 1
• Definite for, a brilliant writer, one of the best on-site. –—Hv (talk) 1/05 15:39
• Hell yes. To coin a phrase, Skullthumper is one of our best writers. Oh wait... that didn't coin anything.   Le Cejak • <May 01, 2008 [15:40]>
• Skullthumper's work is always very original. By a lucky coincidence, his work's also funny. Hence, for. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  17:02, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
• Check it out! I voted for him last month! Guys! Look at me! I did! For reals! Look! Look! I did this last month too! I'd do it next month too (hint, hint)!! -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:02, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• I'm the C-A-S an the O-V-A and the rest is F-L-Y. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:21, May 2
• Dig --THINKER 12:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• For. Skullthumper has deserved this for a long time. Ever since Kitchen Sink, he's been putting out hit after hit. To me, this is no contest. Give the man what he deserves. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 13:25 May 2
• One Word. Monotony -RAHB 23:38, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
• Two More Words: Kitchen Sink. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:02, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
• Per RAHB - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 17:38, May 3
• Ja. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 00:44, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
• For Now's the time, the time is now. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:40, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
• For--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 14:47, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
• FourUser:Raiespio/sig
• I ♥ Dr. S. --Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 13:05, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
• Strong thump. --So So 14:46, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
• This seems rather unanimous Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
• Floor --Moneke 06:11, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
• For Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog| 05:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
• For --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:32, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
• For --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 21:36, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
• For • nyp 13:44, 27 May 2008
• Foreplay Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise 17:08 27 May
• Meaningless For I think it's all but official. Still, I wanna add my support for one of our best editors, wherever he scampered off to! -OptyC Sucks! CUN00:04, 31 May

• But I'm not nominated this month! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:08, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom Skull deserves it A LOT but Under User at least needs a shot and deserves to win sooner or later if not this month. Hyperdrinking and UnScripts:Average Cop were both excellent works of his :D --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 09:32, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

• Oh dammit, DJ Irreverent and UU deserve to be nommed, too.   Le Cejak • <May 02, 2008 [12:43]>

DJ Irreverent (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom DJ is a very fast learner and, like everyone who's cool on this site, reminds me of a young me. Everyone agrees that Skull deserves it this month, but DJ deserves at least some recognition. Rock on, DJ!   Le Cejak • <May 02, 2008 [12:46]>

Shucks but I like being a future WotM as of right now. The Doctor deserves his medicine a lot more than I do right now. :D --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:30, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

heh no votes, oh well... :D --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 15:04, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

SysRq (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom I love Skull: I really do. Because he has the nom locked up, we should take a look at SysRq here. He reminds me of a young me (as do many new users), and therefore deserves at least a nom. Keep on keepin' on, SysRq.   Le Cejak • <May 02, 2008 [1:59]>

• Have you ever stopped to consider that the reason they all remind you of yourself is because you're in no way special?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 02:18, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

• Either that or everyone's special. ...Nah, you're right.   Le Cejak • <May 02, 2008 [2:19]>

• Maybe I'm just paranoid, but I keep on suspecting {{USERNAME}} whenever I see my name. I'm surprised. The nom in itself is a huge compliment, thanks Cajek! ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 12:44 May 2

June

NotM

Qua (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Confirmed sock of NXWave. ~ 15:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

• FUCKING TOLD YOU TLB! YEAH! SUCK ON THIIIIIIIISSS!! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
  • I need to come to IRC more often, I never get to the monthly NXWave meetings anymore...~ 16:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
  • I'm at least pretty sure I told you, and you never got it checked out. - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 18:15, Jun 23
    • Nuh uh :( -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
• Did I spot it, or what? And SysRQ said I was weird... sheesh. --Hyperbole 17:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Score: +0 banned German would-be entrepreneurs with footwear on their hands

• Nom & For He seems like a pretty cool n00b. --B4tm4n 07:19, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• For Has icecream --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:38, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

  Has rape in that van to. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:13, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

• For. He's one of the coolest noobs in the metaphorical town (+I adopted him). - [09:07 1 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise
• Para -RAHB 21:29, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• I do believe that RAHB means por. - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 02:56, Jun 2

  Yeah. Blame babblefish for that one. -RAHB 07:49, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

• Estar - Didn't realize he was a noob! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 00:52, Jun 3
• Spanish. I like this guy. sirsysrq @ 00:46 Jun 14
  • Dammit. sirsysrq @ 01:03 Jul 1
• PHOR This guy seems alright. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 01:04, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
• Daemon with an Umlaut: Check out the article by this user: "Why?:Not answer the phone at 3 AM in the White House"--Elf06 04:34, 15 June 2008
• Why not. Seems like a nice n00b. Oh yeah, Elf06, if you were trying to nominate me you did it wrong. Anyway, my Why:Not answer the phone at 3 AM in the White House is complete, irredeemable crap, so I don't deserve it, and I've been an Uncyc user for exactly 40 days, and a few hours, not "30 +/- 3". Wow, you're really a n00b. But thanks for the Fred Thompson ninja star. --Daemon with an umlaut 12:56, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

(UTC)

• A good guy Yeah, he's kewl.   Le Cejak • <16:02, 18 Jun 2008>
• Sure Because he promised to give me head if I voted for him. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:06, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

• Vote withdrawn. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:31, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

• What --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 16:54, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
• Aye • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:54, Jun 18
• Abstain - Maybe my hat needs new tin foil, but does anyone else find it strange that Qua's *second* contribution to Uncyclopedia was "15:55, 11 May 2008 (hist) (diff) NOTM‎ (←Redirected page to Uncyclopedia:Noob of the Month) (top)"?? --Hyperbole 23:58, 18 June 2008 (UTC)

• You're weird. sirsysrq @ 02:04 Jun 19

• You're wrong. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 06:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

• Strong For The ideal Noob Fou-Lu 15:22, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
• For I'd assumed he'd been around for a while! ~FAG! +chatline "if it ain't broke, break it" (CUN·VFH)

  How right you were... --UU - natter 18:18, Jun 23

The Woodburninator (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +16 votes from you, NOT from Thou

• Nom. Yeah, I'm sticking with my vote for Qua, but I still think this little trooper has put in a lot of effort into the short time he's been with us. After reviewing his edits, I'd say Lj is training this one well, which makes me thing he should at least give Qua a run for his money. sirsysrq @ 18:13 Jun 19
  • +F♥r. Jeez, I come back from a week's hiatus to find that the ever-growing dick of NXWave has once again penetrated our fair wiki? God dammit. Don't feel like this is just because I have to, this For is for all reasons stated above when I nommed this guy. sirsysrq @ 01:05 Jul 1
• For! - Just read Thou. Now that's what I'm talking about. --Hyperbole 16:04, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
• Holy shit Thou is an awesome article read it now. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:44, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
• Yes Very good. MrN  Fork you! 16:51, Jun 20
• Changed to Woody Although Qua has done a lot, Woodburninator's article score is 2 for 2   Le Cejak • <16:56, 20 Jun 2008>
• For per everything Hype's said on this page as of this revision. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 21/06 17:40
• For although I dig Qua, Woody has been writing and Qua has been coding. Woody you are the funniest noob since, well, me. Great job and keep it up.--- Cheapinitreal (talk) 19:33, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

• You're not funny Cheap...ahhhhh, stop hitting me!!! Ahhhhh, yes, you're funny, you're funny, you're hilarious, please stop hitting me!!! Ahhhhh! How dare you hit me! - [19:48 22 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

• YTTE, I only hit you because I love you. You'll think it is hilarious over time.--- Cheapinitreal (talk) 23:44, 22 June 2008 (UTC)

• For. ~ 13:23, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
• For. Doing stuff, and doing it well. Qua is good too, but Woody here gets the vote. Good to see some good noobs coming along. Oh, and for hitting YTTE as well. No idea why, but it seems like such a good idea. --UU - natter 13:28, Jun 23

He's all squishy. That's why. ~ 13:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

• For, then! You've got some great articles, dude, keep it up! - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 17:03, Jun 23
• For and if you're a sock of any perma-banned users as well, I'll kill you. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:33, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Hahaha. No...I'm not really sure what is going on, and I only kind of understand sockpuppets. But, no, I'm just some cute innocent n00b who's parents aren't at home, and is just waiting for you to stop by and "help me with my problems." Oh, and watch out for those Chris Hansons. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 21:51, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

• Process of elimination But Woody (that's the short name I'm going to call you by now, Woody) is pretty great too. -RAHB 22:59, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
• For I'll just vote for RcMurphy next month. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 08:16, Jun. 25, 2008
• For This dude is the truth, now everybody's given him guest spots, stocks through the roof I heard he'll fuck 'em like despots. --Major'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 21:39, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
• For seems to actually care about improving uncyclopedia, we need more people like him joining. Have Fun! MuCal. BFF Sir Orian57!Talk!PEE!Read!UnProvise!Awards! 03:23 27 June 2008
• Most certainly Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:52, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
• For Thou art voted for. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:15, 27 June 2008 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +129 users who have been n00bs for 30 days, +/- 1,171

• Nom + For because Woodburninator needs some competition. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:12, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
• For votes from all of us because Rcmurphy left his jewel-encrusted pocketwatch in our hot tub, and has yet to come by to retrieve it. --128 Hot Katies 24:06, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Special shout out to you, Katie Eighty. -SB

• Four Because qua was nxwave. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 20:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

UotM

Manticore (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4

• Nom & For as per last month, but actually voting for him this month! ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 1/06 07:35
• Strong for. What else can I vote when the user's called Mantiwhore? --User:Jack Phoenix/sig 09:43, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• Strong for. What can I say? He's a whore. Nuff said. Greyman^(Talk) 21:55, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• For--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 16:10, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

TheLedBalloon (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +23 Lead Balloons

• Nom + für Led works super diligently. He never misses an opportunity to tell me so. Whereas I don't do jack shit because I'm a pathetic lazy excuse for a whatever-I-am, Led is quite often the only one you'll see in the deletion log because he's working so damn hard. I just have to vote Led this month.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 16:15, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• Ay -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:16, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• For -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 18:21, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• For. Led is awesome and stuff. Also: Don Leddy cooks, Don Leddy swi-iiings, he's got the look, Don Leddy, he's the king. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 18:39, Jun 1
• For. He hasn't got this yet? • Spang • ☃ • talk • 18:42, 01 Jun 2008
• For - I'm scared of his power, but I have to admit he does a fine job. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 20:53, Jun 1
• For I said Manticore this month last month. I still love you Manticore, but I suppose Led does deserve it this month. -RAHB 21:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• Led. One of my favorite kids on this site. He's funny, he's helpful, he's fair, he's a freak in bed, and he's not a T-Rex. One helluva citizen if you ask me. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:04 Jun 2
• LEEEEEED! LEEEEDD OOOOVVVEERRR HEEEERRREEEE!!! Yes, but seriously, Led is a great adopter and a great administrator.   Le Cejak • <16:12, 03 Jun 2008>
• For. About time too. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
• For. Led has been the most useful chap around for some time. An example for all to follow. MrN  Fork you! 23:35, Jun 4
• For; Hey, hey, mama, said the way you move gonna make you sweat, gonna make you groove. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:08, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
• FOOOUUUR-Bobofosho2 16:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
• Pb Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 20:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
• For - Even though I'm extremely bitter that I won't win this month (some of you are going to get banned), he's just too friendly to say no to. Like a puppy in a pet store. Or a prostitute standing on the side of the road. — Sir Manticore 06:44, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
• For. And I promise to unban anyone who gets banned by Mantiwhore. ~ 16:54, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
• For! I've been waiting a long time to be able to vote for Leddy. And that's MY nickname, it was MINE first bitches! --~FAG! +chatline "if it ain't broke, break it" (CUN·VFH) 08:58, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Yeah. You wish.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 20:23, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
• For - About time. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 11:28, Jun. 14, 2008
• For. /me writes Mrs. Modusballoon on notebook cover over and over again (with the o's shaped like little hearts). *swoon*. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:24, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
• Abs. until he changes that terrible sig he's currently going with. Just kidding (not about the sig though, that sucks). Dig --THINKER 05:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• For Definitive winner. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:13, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
  • He has enough without me. I'm voting for PENIS!!! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:18, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
• He squeezes my lemon. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For. TheLedZeppelinBalloon AwesomeGuy 12:50, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
• For --AAA! (AAAA) 13:06, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
• PB and Jelly Mr. Balloon, have you ever you know, considered it? Mightydandylion (talk) Fk 18:03, 21 June 2008 (UTC)
• For dull, self-referential voting comments. Oh yeah. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

SysRq (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2 PrtSc

• Nom Contributes very well to lots of different aspects of the site, and I think he's worthy of a nom even if he is up against some tough opposition. MrN  Fork you! 19:40, Jun 1
• Vomit, vomit, clean it up with Comet. The nom itself is an honor. Not an honour, but an honor all the same. Also, I think Leddy is more deserving of it this month, he does some great things around here. Gize, vote for him. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:09 Jun 2
• For I have to, or I'm kicked out of the fanclub. Besides, Led doesn't need my vote. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:27, 14 Jun
• For Per Optimus. Except for that Led part. Who's Led? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 01:12, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

YesTimeToEdit (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: YesTimeTo11

• Nom & For YesTimeToEdit has seriously done a lot and is revolutionizing Uncyclopedia as we speak. Truely an honerable Uncyclopedian. --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 18:34, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
• Agreed, YTTE is a prince among editors. But this is not his month. Leddy should have won last month. But starting UnProvise with Orian is certainly a UotM-able crime. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:39 Jun 2
• Self-for Damn it, I want awards. Also SysRq, among my many achievements are: the Game main page and associated pages, my new otM idea and tidying up HowTo with UU. I'm damn cool. :-) - [18:43 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

What I meant to say was: "I CAN HAZ NOMINATION?!" - [18:53 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

• For What Yettie said and the whole UnProvise thing he did almsot entirly by himself - I did want to help though! - and he's definitly deserving of this. Have Fun!MuCal. Orian57Talk!Read!PEE!UnProvise!CMC! 19:32 2 June 2008

  And you shall go to the ball, Orian. I mean, and you did help out, Orian. - [19:35 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

• For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:47, Jun 3
• Comment. YTTE definitely deserves this award, but next month.   Le Cejak • <16:18, 03 Jun 2008>

"Dam right I do" YTTE says arrogantly, "better vote for me next month!". Then he realises that this is not the way to win over potential voters and falls silent. Writing in UnProvise 31st person style is awesome! - [16:20 3 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

• For - YTTE is a community-builder like few others. With twelve YTTEs, every article on Uncyclopedia would be funny and we'd all be mailing each other complimentary bottles of champagne. With one hundred YTTEs, we could conquer the world. --Hyperbole 23:15, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

  One hundred YTTE's to conquer the world? Jeese, that's a bit steep... :-) - [18:20 6 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

• For --B4tm4n 09:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
• He got the BBQ --ILoveBBQ 16:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
• For --Mgr. TuoDecaps ^(talk) Contribs 01:08 9 June 2008
• Always For Seriously, we need a non-banned user to win. I can't beleive Jasper Ain't dead yet! I'm happy too, sire. DR2 ASA or Nutella? Decide. Talk to meh. 18:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Oh wow, I've got 9! Wooo-weeeee! - [20:44 9 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

I don't understand this comment in the yeast bit -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:33, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

• Agree YTTE Helped me see the light. He deserves this award.YesTimeTo ^{ApoligizeToYTTE 02:11, 15 June 2008 (UTC)}
• He blows off like no one else Intemperate that how you will... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:34, 15 June 2008 (UTC)

Dexter111344 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom Now I know that it's late in the month and everything, but Dexter really deserves a mention. He is probably the most active VFD voter I have seen in my time as a poopsmith. He also does great work reverting vandals, adding to QVFD, and contributes well to Ban Patrol. In addition Dexter has shown good skills being able to calm down users who might otherwise have ended up being banned. Dexter is an all round great user. Keep up the good work Dex. KerKill! MrN  Fork you! 22:51, Jun 16

• I was an even more active VFDer when STM was poopsmith. Man how time doesn't fly. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:08, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

Considering that STM was never a poopsmith, that is a problematic declaration /me squint eyes ~ 07:55, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

Shit. I meant Strange but Untrue. /me feels stupid now. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:51, 17 June 2008 (UTC)

• Will vote one day --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:45, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

PENIS (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2 GIANT dicks.

• Nom Actual not a penis. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:35, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Now a FOR!!! FU LEDDY! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:19, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
• For I like penis --

  Kingkitty ~Fuck you Brett~ ~Die in a fire Favre~

  12:37, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
• Comment - This alone gave us a huge laugh on IRC:

(diff) (hist) . . Template:Expletive‎; 04:03 . . (+40) . . PENIS (Talk | contribs) (added chicken shit)

-- Kip > Talk • Works • • 11:02, Jun. 30, 2008

WotM

DJ Irreverent (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +14 disc-jockeying Aussies

• Nom & For. It's time. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey)  10:36, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• Yaf pl0x Who knew Australia could produce something that's not a total mistake?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 16:33, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• For--— Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• For. Sorry UnIdiot, but I think WotM requires a certain finesse with mainspace articles that I just haven't seen with you, yet. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:33, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• Obvious For --¿Qua? es mi página de discusión, es lo que mi contribuiría 00:45, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
• For an' Oi would loik to assure all the Poms an' Seppos that Oi am in nah way biased. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:10, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
• Adoptee who deserves his moment   Le Cejak • <1:13, 02 Jun 2008>
• I don't want to vote against or abstain so that means....FOR! Deservinoes it. - [18:03 2 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise
• Dig --THINKER 05:15, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• Yes! --Moneke 06:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
• For may a brother have his day? --- Cheapinitreal (talk) 19:28, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
• Real classy dude -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 10:30, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
• Oh yeah. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
• For Do I really need a reason? =Hex= TALK: WORKSHOP: CONTRIBUTIONS: 12:02, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

  For my blurb - Can you pick from these articles please? Uncyclopedia Health Service, UnBooks:Life as a 4⅝ Year Old, UnBooks:Official Informational Guide to the 2008 Beijing Olympics Games, Campaign Leaflet, Pre-Market Economy, Schoolean Algebra cos I wuv them so... not as much as I wuv UU though --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 12:13, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

SysRq (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3 T-Rexs interspecies Americans

• Nom, but withholding for now. Also deserves some recognition for his writings. - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 16:34, Jun 1
• Virgin For * Flumpa 22:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• I HAVE NEVER HAD SEX. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 18:02 Jun 2
  • SysRq will give one of the remaining folks here a run for their money next month.   Le Cejak • <22:51, 14 Jun 2008>
• For because SysRq is funny. --Hyperbole 17:11, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
• For as per hype. Have Fun! MuCal. BFF Sir Orian57!Talk!PEE!Read!UnProvise!Awards! 03:25 27 June 2008

The UnIdiot (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4 Kansas Whalers

• Nom & For. DJI and SysRq are both ace. But this here is, I believe, our most featured writer not to have won WotM. And with some damn fine articles under his belt, he deserves the recognition now. Now, dammit! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 18:29, Jun 1
• Wow - I'm pretty honored just to be nommed! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 19:59, Jun 1
• For UU's right. This guy's the most featured without the award, and several with less features than him have won it too. Aside from that, he seems the best candidate this month and has always been able to bring us original, funny ideas. <insert "I'm so proud of my adoptee" phrase here> -RAHB 21:00, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Comment I just finished my first mainspace article. I'm soooo diverse now! - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 01:16, Jun 5

• I really wanna vote for all of these guys... UU, SysRq, DJ, all you guys are awesome... but it's UnIdiot's spot in the HoS that decides it for me. He deserves this, I think. For. - Don Leddy the Crunch (Nyah, see, nyah!) 02:15, Jun 7

Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +9 people who use those sewer pipe thingys to look up ladies dresses (and the occasional man, despite how much he denies it)

• Nom & For I nommed him last month and damned if we don't give this guy a WotM before my grubby little hands spoil it for everyone. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 23:10, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
• For. Also, FU Ljlego. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
• For Under user (or "UU" as I've heard him called) can write articles. He can write good articles. He can write articles that make people laugh. He can write articles using a keyboard. He can write articles in English. He can come back to my place after this WotM thing is over and write me a batch of cookies. Basically, he knows how to write. And, as far as I know, that's what I'm voting about. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:05, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
• For I like DJ's stuff, but I prefer UU's so... MrN  Fork you! 02:10, Jun 7
• I have spies everywhere. ~ 16:49, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
• Yes. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:51, Jun 13
• Fuck yes! Wilhelm screamer 22:29, 14 June 2008 (UTC)
  • comment You have no idea who Under user is, do you, Mr. Fuck Yes?   Le Cejak • <22:50, 14 Jun 2008>
• For per Cs1987. I'll get you for that Lj. You and your little dog. — Sir Manticore 17:09, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
• For --Knucmo2 10:39, 24 June 2008 (UTC)