Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 14

Writer of the Year

Mattsnow (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom + For ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:19, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• I remember the day this motherfucker emigrated from ED and decided to write Heaven's Gate. Honestly, I thought he'd split after a few weeks, like half of the other promising new users that come around, but Matt stuck and developed into one of the most accomplished, hilarious, prolific, stylized writers this site's ever seen. I gotta vote for Flamingo, but something tells me that 2012 might be the Year of the Snow. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:14, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual for, as many of my spirits are for him and TFK...and per TFK, if he keeps it up, wow! Does everyone realize that Mattsnow has had 19 features since he came here in mid-April! And more on the way that were written in '11. With all these guys roaming the halls we are a lucky website indeed. Aleister 12:36 2-1-'12
• You sir, shall be getting my vote next year without hesitation. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   22:11, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7

• Nom. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:19, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Sorry, Mattsnow, but this guy's had it coming for a long time. -- 00:30, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• For if only for Filial Piety -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 22:52, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Strong gor. Feck, where do I start? I predict, and also kinda hope, that this year's Top 10 will mostly be TKF articles. When it comes to telling a gag, he is one of the best in the history of site, and far-and-away the best who is currently active. In fact, when people ask me who my favourite comedian is at the moment, I tell them it's this guy on the internet called Thekillerfroggy. They stare at me with bemusement of course, but he makes me laugh more than anyone currently on TV or in movies. His works cover a vast range of styles and topics, from silly to iconoclastic to educational and plain downright hilarious. Yet, they all feel consistent. Anyway, enough sweet talk, let's do it. --Black Flamingo 23:15, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• For TKF is the Muhammad Ali of writing articles for Uncyclopedia. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:39, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
  • Because he refused to fight in Vietnam? - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at23:59, Wednesday 04 January 2012 -
    • Yeah. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:17, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For Diabolical guy who writes great. Most of his articles are fabulous, style, content, humour, polishing and making me pee my pants. --ShabiDOO 20:16, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

  See below -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:15, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

• Strong throbbing for – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 23:03 Jan 07, 2012
• For. So we can have three deserving winners this year. : ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:35, 10 January 2012
• Extreme necromancy/lurker for. -- Village Idiot♠KUN Free Speech 07:53, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Black flamingo11 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 10

• It's been a red letter year for Flamingo. He churned out features like nobody's business, including at least two year's-best per season, without fail. Yes, I consider every one of those articles in that overlinked sentence to be among the year's best, and those are only half of the features he's got this year. But if this was just about quality writing, then... well, Flamingo'd still have a damn good chance. But Flamingo also happened to be, far and away, still the best Pee Reviewer in 2011, able to insightfully comment on articles of all shapes and colors, enriching the site's overall writing by spreading his grace, charm, and humor unto a host of other writers faster than gonorrhea at a Vietnamese truck stop. He is a teacher, a scholar, and a fucking amazing writer. Plus, two cancer themed features. Two! Cancer!!! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:26, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Great prose along with the funny, I hesitated between TKF and him. Mattsnow 23:05, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• I have never felt more satisfied than voting here >> (x) << for this flamingo with revitiligo. Ok so this vote deserves elaboration. TBF was the best writer of 2011 in my mind - if Sog were to win it would be equally deserved - however I feel the guy I am voting for is on track to being one of Uncyclopedia's greats. --Nikau 01:24, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual For. Funny, modest and hard-working. You know he reminds me of me. --Chiefjustice32X 09:04, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Eats Black Shrimp This is a tough vote 'cause all these great writers need to get laid, yet per TFK, when someone has the year that Black Flamingo has had (not even taking into consideration his stellar year before) this award should float towards him like a seeing-eye blimp. Numerous articles, many collabs, reviewing genius, and consistent high quality writing throughout the preceding 12 months have won high praise from everyone. Aleister 12:14 2-1-'12
• A simple and elegant For. -RAHB 02:54, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For Great writer and an added bonus of helping other writers be good writers too. --ShabiDOO 20:16, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

  Below-er. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:15, January 6, 2012 (UT

• Strong For Great writer and mentor. Well balanced and not a single mean bone in his body. Fantastic writer, reviewer and overall good member to have on this site. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   22:10, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For I don't know which one I should vote for but... It's a difficult decisionll, so I vote for BF because he's got less votes than 2 other guys Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 12:59, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
• For But only for exhorting the perils of cancer research. I myself have given it up to become a hedge fund manager. God bless BF, doing what's right for the universe 22:14, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
• With respect to all the other writers 2011 belonged to Black Flamingo. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:24 Jan 30 2012
• Spiritual for. This man saved my marriage. --Black Flamingo 14:51, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

NoNamesLeft (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Another prolific, talented writer who made his mark with articles like the articulate My Name is Earl, twisted War of Colonial Aggression, Knights in White Satin, and many, many, many, many, many more. A One-eyed Jack for 2011. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:25, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Ultra Mega Strong For My favourite writer this year without a doubt. This guy showed up out of nowhere and quietly wrote a few materpieces and a lot of good articles requested without pee reviews and is still spitting them out. Many of his articles have made me laugh out loud really hard, in that kind of way that im convulsing and I cant read the text out to my friends. These moments are precious ;) ... thanks NoNAmesLeft --ShabiDOO 20:16, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

  Alas, only one vote allowed, Shab. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:15, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

  I believe you my dear Killer Froggy, but, where does it say that? --ShabiDOO 04:53, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

  Well, I mean, it's assumed that you can only vote once on any award unless it's specified otherwise (VFS) or obviously a joke (UGotM) -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:05, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

  So then it isn't a rule. Hmmmmmmm. I think I'll stick with my three votes then :) as all three writers deserve a vote from me. --ShabiDOO 05:36, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

  But really, pick one guy and one vote. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:26, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

  Only if you say please with powdered sugar on top and a dash of freshly grated ginger :) --ShabiDOO 06:45, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

  please with powdered sugar on top and a dash of freshly grated ginger -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:49, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

• Spiritual Flour NoNamesLeft is one of the best and most creative writers I've seen come by here, and he keeps getting better and better as the months go by (people tend to do that, except those who don't). Flour all over the place. Aleister 9:44 29-1-'12

Funnybony (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Deserving of a huge nom this year, Funnybony is far and away the fastest and the bonyiest writer here, especially when it comes to UnNews. He's the King of UnNews. Look at his userpage, look at it now, I can't even count as high as the number of quality articles he's written. And the features for mainspace articles just kept coming this year, lots over a dozen, like a spout or an ant hill or something. Funnybony is one of our treasures, and I for two can only stand in awe at his unending contributions. (He's also the one who told me that uncy is a playground for adults, thus defining it perfectly. Aye!) Aleister 22:31 New Year's Day 2012
• For Close call, but I think the bone deserves it. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:25, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• For Funnybony is one of those quiet users who just go on and does stuff and stays out of the easily recognisable talk page bouncing. His unnews are always great and he'll always help you out with anything. He's made me laugh a lot and ontop of that...he's a great guy. Like Ali said...an uncyclopedian treasure. --ShabiDOO 01:53, January 13, 2012 (UTC)

Sog1970 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 10

• Nom and for. Remember this guy? Our most featured author? Eight more features than anyone else? 21.5 more than BF? 18.5 more than TKF? Some of our very best work? Hasn't won this award yet? Too many questions? OK, I know that perhaps TKF and BF have had slightly more stellar years, and I really do love their work, but Sog became the first Uncyclopedian to reach 60 features this year, and he seemed to do it without breaking sweat. The most consistent writer we've had, and the guy who, in my view, deserves this thing. --UU - natter 08:27, Jan 2
• For. Per UU. Being the only guy on Uncyclopedia to reach 60 features is quite an achievement and thus he deserves this. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:07, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Per the How the hell has he not won this yet clause. Pup 06:30 03 Jan '12
• For. Soggy has gone quiet of late, perhaps back in his shed for a recharge but for sheer quality output he can't be matched. This has to be the Year of Sog! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:10, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
• For. King of the ring.--Funnybony  14:10, Jan 3

  For. Assuming that he is retired, this seems to be a fitting send-off. --86.13.216.134 16:44, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

  Stricken pending policy thingy -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:19, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

• For. Here's hoping this award might lure him back. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:18, January 7, 2012 (UTC)
• Glowing praise Of all the writers on this site, I feel there have only ever been four who could turn out works that were funny without fail but were always of a style distinctly unique to the particular writer. They are Procopius, Modusoperandi, Hyperbole and Sog1970.15Mickey20 is close, but he never turned out so much work as those 4. Mhaille and Cap'n Ben deserve lifetime achievement awards for writing quality articles across a full five years of this site's history, but those 4 stand out in my mind. -Nikau 10:38, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

  Cajek? --Black Flamingo 22:36, January 12, 2012 (UTC)

  And Hardwick! Don't forget Hardwick! Also So So. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:26, January 13, 2012 (UTC)

  Poor Hardwick disappeared years before I arrived, sadly. Bouncy Castle is gold, though. Damn, So So fits that short list well, too. I need. To stop. Typing like. This. --Nikau 03:49, January 25, 2012 (UTC)

• This guy gets my vote. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 04:37, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
• For. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 23:35, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
• um yeah this person is cool and shit so for --HM (T) 04:54, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
• This is not late. You're just drunk. Also I love him.

1234 ~ 00:01, 1 February 2012

Mhaille (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5

• Nom and goddamn it. His traditional nom. It'd be nice to think he'd finally win it, after arguably deserving it every year thus far, but he probably won't, (especially since I'm not even voting for him myself). He's had a quiet year by his ridiculously high standards, and still put out several of my favourite articles of 2011. And it was a pleasure to finally collab with him as well. He really, really, should have already won this. --UU - natter 08:27, Jan 2
• For. Per last year and the year before. Puts out heaps of brilliant work, is regularly on hand to help out new writers, makes me snigger like a fool and is a very sexy man to boot. This guy. --Chiefjustice32X 09:01, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• For.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:33, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• For. I don't know much, but I do know that the check from Mhaille's mom cleared. And also he's an inspiration to us all. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:30, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
• For. I think hes been absolutely smashing for many years as my IP lurking self has witnessed,while, yes as Chief said this was not his best year, I think he needs to finally win. I mean each time, so many of my favorite films lose out on an Oscar because of the other 'Sweepers'. It would be nice to see a deserving finally win one. Parabolictangent 14:23, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
• For. If comedy writing were biscuits, Mhaille could stuff my basket. No homo. --Imrealized ...hmm? 16:01, January 13, 2012 (UTC)

Guildensternenstein (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom. It's almost becoming a yearly tradition to nom Guildy for this too. He hasn't exactly been active all year, which is a blow to everyone of course, but going back to the start of the year has written some of my favourite articles, including competition winners and highbrow penis jokes. What more can you ask from an Uncyclopedian? Hot sex, obviously. --Black Flamingo 14:25, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• I was gonna nom this guy first, but then I remembered he was a huge pretentious loser/tool. Nah I'm just foolin'. I didn't nominate him because I couldn't, until this moment, really put into words how much I've grown to love and respect Guildy as a writer of funny things. And I still can't really put it into words, seeing as how insubstantial this post actually is. Shit. Really wished he woulda kept writing all throughout the year, because his latest articles have definitely been some of his (and the site's) best. See: Sans-culottes, UnNews:Madden 12 to feature new Lockout Mode, UnScripts:Law & Order: Puritan New England for just a taste. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:33, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • Awww, thanks, TKF. I've grown to love and respect you, too. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:05, January 13, 2012 (UTC)

Nikau (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom. So what if he hasn't been around for anything even resembling the whole year? Nikau is on one hell of a roll that, at 2011's loss, just so happened to fall at the end of one year and the beginning of another. We're sorta collaborating on something, and I am staggered by the hilarious material he keeps coming up with, and the pace at which he does it. At the very least he deserves this shout out. --Black Flamingo 14:11, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Encouragement vote. Probably the "least deserving" of the contenders, if only because of the short time he's been around. He seems to have the required personality disorder writing ability to win this so let's hope he hangs around. Also, this vote saves me from having to make a difficult choice from the above awesome fuckity mofo fuckers. I understand and I wish to continue. . 09:02, January 15, 2012 (UTC)

Aimsplode (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• 'Nom Doesn't everyone remember all of the amazing things this guy wrote? Like...for instance...there was the............well I remember he did a...........wasn't there some kind of.........................well.....he did write some funny stuff on peoples talk pages such as..............................hmmm.......I distinctly remember some kind of forum edit that made me......................... In any case its not the quality that goes in it...but the intent. And the intent was always intentional so you can't knock anyone down for that. Or something like that. --ShabiDOO 06:50, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual for I remember vividly that time he told me to fuck off because I asked him to go judge the contest he created himself. His melodious prose will be missed. Mattsnow 11:56, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual against Contributing to the absence of Lollipop through being aggressive and rude, didn't write anything and he's under the handicap of being permabanned. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:12, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
• Spirited away Our UnBeloved UnWriter of the Year? Aleister 1:17 12-1-'12
• Spiritual abstain It's really such a tough call. --ShabiDOO 01:38, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
• Ineligible; user is dead.

1234 ~ 12:19, 13 January 2012

• Isn't Zombiebaron dead too, by definition? Where do we draw the line? Oh, I see you already drew the line. Never mind. Aleister 12:23 13-1-'12

  Zombiebaron is undead, you silly person. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:09, 13 January 2012

Uncyclopedian of the Year

Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 16

• Nom. To put it lengthily, Zombiebaron has been a presence on the site both behind, in front of, and during the scenes though all of 2011, from January to December; an authority figure on-and-off-wiki; a consistent and effective administrator to our users, and an active mediator during battles with Wikia, other outside forces, and between them admins themselves; an influential spearhead of multiple movements and renovations, including this year's highly successful FFW and the remodeled Maintenance tags; a friendly and reliable presence on IRC all-year round; a newly, and righteously, crowned bureaucrat; a patient man who's earned his laurels after seven years of dedicated, hard work; and, last and least leastly of all; a fecking great drinking buddy. To put it shortly, Zombiebaron is the Uncyclopedian of the Year. To put it Zombiebaron, Zombiebaron. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:38, January 1, 2012 (UTC)

  Actually, the maintenance templates thing was Skully and me. You can tell because we never actually cleaned up after ourselves and now I'm hiding from my talkpage where PotR... noticed. Perhaps this is a sign that Zombiebaron should finish what we started.

1234 ~ 22:36, 1 January 2012

• Frankly, the sentence "because it's fucking Zombiebaron!" is more than enough to justify this vote, but TKF made a soppy speech so I probably should too. Ahem. If anyone can save this 'pedia, it's ZB. There are other great candidates, of course, but after seven years of rarely-matched hard work, maintenance, mediation, innovation, good advice, omnipresence and (let's not forget) hilarious articles and images; there is no else who should win it while he's in the running. Hell, sometimes it feels like he's running this place single-handedly. If you hadn't guessed already, strong for. --Black Flamingo 22:14, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Zombiebaron. He's been here since '05 (that's over 6 years!) and has never stopped maintaining this site. TKF and Blackflamingo have said it all already. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:31, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• For. He is the light that never goes out. Outside that is. --Chiefjustice32X 14:17, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Okay. I was going to vote for Lyrithya, but then she tore my heart out (and crossed her nomination out). Then I was going to vote for one of the other candidates, but then I was like "lolno." Then I was like "Zombiebaron." In conclusion, Zombiebaron. -RAHB 02:57, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For. --Roman Dog Bird 07:34, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For. A very productive year for ZB - not to mention the amount of stuff he has done since 2006 for the site.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:35, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
• Of course. Zombiebaron is the heart of Uncyc - without it, there is no Uncyc. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 21:37, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
• Zombiebaron – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 23:02 Jan 07, 2012
• For 2005 to 2012, he's apparantly been going strong here the whole time, including a year of major work in '011. A man, a plan, a canal, Zombiebaron. Aleister 2:51 10-1-'12
• For Panama. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:20, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
• For Is aboot fucking time, eh? Congrats Kakun  nukaK
• For Because once upon a time this man nominated me for NotM. I think. I don't even remember anymore. -- Village Idiot♠KUN Free Speech 07:55, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
• For because he's willing to accept it, unlike some people I could name. Also if there was an adopter of the year he would get that, as he is the first person in two years who has been willing to adopt me. Which means whatever I do wrong it's his fault. Pup 06:47 21 Jan '12

*For So many great candidates, but this one's probably done the most for the site this year. -- 23:51, January 29, 2012 (UTC)

• Oops, voted twice. -- 01:24, February 1, 2012 (UTC)

• /me Zombiebaron Aw, that doesn't work here. Shame. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   00:34, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
• YES AND I DON'T CARE THAT THIS IS LATE GOOD DAY. Night. Whatever.

1234 ~ 00:06, 1 February 2012

Lyrithya (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Nom. She's just so weird. More to follow. Possibly. If I remember. --Chiefjustice32X 09:54, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual for. The best Lyrithya we've ever had. Next year, sister... next year. --Black Flamingo 22:26, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Why, yes! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:18, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Because it's fucking Lyrithya. Now, I am a huge fan of our undead overlord, but whenever I pop my head over the parapet here (not often these days, admittedly), it's Lyrithya I see doing what needs doing. She does maintenance stuffs, making-things-work stuffs, and thankless stuffs, and does it well. I also have it on pretty good authority that she has an oppable piggy, and that counts for a lot, in my book (page seven, just after the bit about penguins, in case you want to check). --UU - natter 18:20, Jan 2
• For. Lyrithya is Uncyclopedia's own Fairy Princess. A wave of her wiki admin wand and even the croakers who hop about her talk page will go quiet (well, usually). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:24, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

As much as I appreciate the support, this whole award thing just gives me unhappy feelings and I don't want to be here, so why don't you all vote for Zombles and Skullthumper and Aleister and whoever? They're lovelies and they keep the site going, whereas I neither want nor need the distraction and pointless unhappiness this thing gives me. 1234 ~ 02:41, 4 January 2012

• Spiritual For She deserves it, but is choosing not to take it. But I'm not going to not vote as a result of that. So if she changes her mind, this is becoming a for. Pup 03:31 04 Jan '12

Dr. Skullthumper (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• If we were only counting the first eight months of the year, and Wikia didn't suck, then Skully (and his sidekick Fnoodle) would be a fierce contender for this title. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:38, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual for. As per TKF. If Dr. Skullthumper could stop playing Minecraft for five minutes he could also save this god-awful site from itself. --Black Flamingo 22:28, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Per everything he does, and has ever done for the site. All seriously great candidates, but when it really comes down to it, he has done the most for the site over time. -- 02:22, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

Aleister in Chains (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3

• He does things and he's crazy and he is one of very few folks who actually bothers to recognise the merits of what others do. So, uh, cows.

1234 ~ 02:54, 4 January 2012

• Thanks, very appreciated. But I wasn't even here for most of the year. I'm not even here now (this is being written by bot). You and the others are much better candidates than myself, if I were to be serious for a moment, so vote for one of those. I won't erase this though, as that would be drama (hahahahahaheeheeheeheeheehahahaha huh?) Aleister 3:16 3-1-'12

• Giving Aleister a positive score. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:38, 12 January 2012
• For. -- Sf13 0717 EST 24 JAN, 2012
• For. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 12:59, January 26, 2012 (UTC)

Frosty (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7 cold motherfuckers

• Nom + for. He does so many things around the wiki that it's scary. Awesome Uncyclopedian! Mattsnow 11:57, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
• For. He deserves it. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 12:03, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
• I could voet for any of the other persons listed above or below, but after prolonged consideration, I won't. I'm voting for Frosty. And here's why:
  • Do you realize that Zombiebaron is dead? Why in Fuckville are you voting for a dead guy? This isn't Missouri, you morons. Also, he's an admin, and Fuck The Admins. Anyway, I doubt he does...whatever he does around here...for the awards.
  • As for Dr. Strangelove and All The Young Girls Love Alice, how can you give either of them an "of the Year" award? Skullthumper's been gone for six months, and Aleis had an extended absence. Also, both of them are sperm receptacles. ME CAGO EN SUS LECHE!
  • Lyrithya? Boo, her hovercraft is filled with eels. Too many eels, in fact. She has BUCKETS of them. I can't in good conscience vote for someone with so many eels. IN THE NAME OF SHARK JESUS, HOW DOES ONE PROCURE SO GODDAMNED MANY EELS? DOES SHE BREED THEM? FUCK!
  • Now that we've established that the others suck, why should you vote for Frosty? I'll TELL you why. He cleans up after vandals, tidies up in general, is nice to newbies and losers, has a good sense of humor, routinely demonstrates a greater maturity than half the users here, and is an all-around humble little bogan. ALSO, HE'S FIFTEEN YEARS OLD. Do you know that this spunky bastard thinks he can't write? So what does he hang around here for? To be part of a community, and help out in any way he can. THAT'S the damn definition of "community spirit", you faggots! So put your hand over your hearts and salute this Aussie spark of joy, you deviant homosexuals, because if you don't, he may become disillusioned and leave. And if he does, WOE BETIDE YOU ALL.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Jan 6 '12 10:28 (UTC)
• For. He's not even an admin, but he does lots and lots of cleanup work, votes regularly, and should be encouraged. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:21, January 7, 2012 (UTC)
• For Frosty is awsome. --ShabiDOO 00:06, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
• For. I understand and I wish to continue. . 09:05, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
• For Frosty helped me so many times and bailed me out so much that I actually feel embarrased to mention it. BUT if anyone deserves to win Uncyclopedian of the year, it's Frosty, I tell you. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 10:43, January 19, 2012 (UTC)

Lyrithya (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2 spiritual pats on the back

*Nom + for. Lyrithya, lyrithya, lyrithya. While she is probably mostly modest and most likely an uncyclopedian for the sake of uncyclopedia, she deserves to be the uncyclopedian of the year ... and everyone knows it. She may detest and resist and feign a dislike for it ... but everyone appreciates some gratitude ... everyone likes a thanks ... no matter how hard they say they don't. It is no secret that I find Lyrithya as the most stubborn, hard headed, irritating, unilateral, self defacing users, but she is also a novel, thoughtful, creative, solution finding, problem solving, wit of steel, never says no to a request for help, always finds an elegant and helpful solution to everything, maintains her unique and quirky style and is that humour filled user we all love. She made uncyclopedia what it was in 2011. If she crosses this out ... ignore it. Vote for her. --ShabiDOO 23:46, January 4, 2012 (UTC)

• But it would make her unhappy...so no. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:08, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

  It would only make her unhappy, in a way that makes her really happy. --ShabiDOO 02:32, January 6, 2012 (UTC)

• For.--Funnybony  18:19, Jan 10

  I love you.

1234 ~ 00:08, 1 February 2012

January 2012

Writer of the Month

Bizzeebeever (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 13

• Nom and for. This guy constantly rewrites VFD-quality articles to save them from being deleted. Plus, he already has five features. And, I love beavers. So yeah. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:09, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
• For Mattsnow 01:11, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
• Yeah -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:47, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:45, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
• For ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:54, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
• xtreme for, he's like a writing machine. Aleister 1:14 6-1-'12
• For His rewriting of the Emo article, alone, is mind blowing (and as I said before, most of it in one edit!). He also writes good stuff and he also has a cool user name. I also think he's probably a shredded wheat kind of guy instead of lucky charms, as I dont trust people who eat cereal with marshmellows in it. --ShabiDOO 13:46, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
• For And Bizzeebeever absolutely did NOT bribe me to vote for him! --POP!GoesTheWeasel 10:48, January 7, 2012 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:37, 10 January 2012
• For. I understand and I wish to continue. . 09:09, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
• He has ze qualifications. 2K12_DAN.VRS 01:11, January 25, 2012 (UTC)
• Fizzeefeever. --Black Flamingo 12:55, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Although I can't fathom how such an obvious injustice could have happened. -RAHB 06:38, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

Uncle J (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom and Xtreme spiritual for Uncle J is nommed for the foolitzer this month, something else he's never won, and I am as guilty as guildy (couldn't resist) in not honoring Uncle J's contributions here. Look at his user page, so many articles, so many UnNews pages. Here's another WTF? he's never won this (WTF?HNWT) user. Yay J! Aleister 3:09 6-1-'12
• For - got to vote for myself --Uncle J 04:53, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual for Anyway, he's gonna win Foolitzer Prize if he gives me enough money so I don't summon my hoard of IPs. Mattsnow 22:40, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Leoispotter (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Leo's long been one of my favorite users, but I haven't thought of him as one of my favorite writers, or even a writer in general, until I noticed the great articles and UnNews he's been putting out. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:42, January 7, 2012 (UTC)
• Like that guy too, I'd like to see him write an article after his great Foolitzer Prize success last month. Mattsnow 22:42, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the nomination TKF! My computer is three states away being repaired right now, but when I get it back I'll keep churning out the articles.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 03:47, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

Aleister in Chains (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom and For There are not many contributors who I would consider this award going to twice. Al is one of those few. He'll probably refuse it anyway, but what the hell. Pup 06:02 10 Jan '12

  Spiritual fnord Thanks Puppy, all compliments gratefully accepted. When Dr. Strange won his second (tied that month if memory services) it was after he had something like six features in nine days, so he actually had a great month. Most of the time this is like a Hall of Fame election award, in Doc's case it was earned and so deservedly stands alone. Doc! Aleister 1:34 12-1-'12

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Xamralco (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5

• This dude cleans up after the new and old writers, constantly adding tags to keep quality in this place, on VFD and VFH and he does clean up after vandalism too. Never forget. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:02, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Um...apparently I did a bad thing by being nominated last month and then winning, and thus preventing Xamralco from winning this for December? So...uh...yeah. Also, I apologize.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 2 '12 5:55 (UTC)
• For --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 18:58, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:36, 10 January 2012
• For. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 19:54, January 31, 2012 (UTC)

Pentium5dot1 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5

• Per what Lyrithya said last year, Pentium's been here heaving away for years on fringes and edges like UN:REQ, accompanied only by cobwebs, librarians, and MadMax. Give this kid his long-waiting due. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:16, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• As much as I adore Xamralco, this guy should have at least gotten UotY by now.

1234 ~ 06:21, 2 January 2012

• Old school as fuck. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 06:23, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual For One of the hardest workers that you've never heard of. If he and MadMax had a baby (and who knows if they haven't?) then the baby would be editing by the time it was two. Yay Pentium5dot1! (and p.s., I likey ties, so here's hoping) Aleister 23:23 24-1-'12
• For. Sorry, Xamralco, but I'm going with this guy. He's been really awesome in terms of contribution. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 01:50, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
• Xam really is "sexy useful" but this guy is "vintage sexy useful". --Black Flamingo 12:54, January 29, 2012 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

Kırby (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom and for. His username contains a Unicode character that I can't type on my keyboard. Also, he hates his username. ~Pleb the magic! 23:20, 01/10/2012
• Currently ineligible; he may be considered when he has written an article or created the requisite number of images, however.

1234 ~ 23:33, 10 January 2012

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: rc

• Noob hasn't edited since last October. The gods demand this page be used for something. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:17, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
• Strong For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 13:28, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
• Stronrg -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:17, January 30, 2012 (UTC)
• This noob needs more blonde. Aleister 1:38 31-1-'12

February 2012

Noob of the month

Vodkelpplant (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9

• Nom + For He does stuff for undictionary. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:32, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Dammit Frosty, I was just about to nom this guy! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:16, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Prolific. Just posted an awesome new article in addition to that other stuff. Very cool. -RAHB 03:22, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Since VFH is closed down for repairs, this is as good a place as any to vote for the author of the beforementioned Girl with a Pearl Earring. Aleister 3:27 3-2-'12
• For.And nobody paid me to do it!!! --POP!GoesTheWeasel 07:06, February 7, 2012 (UTC)
• For. I iz agree. Mattsnow 00:03, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
• This guy, for these Undictionary entries. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Feb 15 '12 14:51 (UTC)
• For. Seems to have gone for the moment so perhaps he was a passing comet. Still deserves this though for some excellent work. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:50, February 15, 2012 (UTC)

He back and writing stuff. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:24, February 17, 2012 (UTC)

Writing very good stuff. Wouldn't it be nice to have about a dozen new people like this user show up every month, but it's actually quite hard to succeed here, compare it to the number of IP's and a dozen-edit red-link users. The people who stick around here, after we all initiate them in what amounts to a group initiation for the ones who stick around, have something unusually interesting about them. Which makes for good writing and the capacity to want to go on a learning curve. And if and when Vodkelpplant goes back and polishes his pages after about half-a-year playing with us in this surprising unformal high quality writing workshop, wow. Bottom line, thougth, it's all just fun and play, with the side benefit of learning how to put some words and pics together so that other people at least read them, smile sometimes, find something unique and interesting sometimes, and really laugh like a hyena once in awhile. I glanced at, looked at one pic for about seven seconds, and read just a sentence or two, and I can't (but have to) wait to read "The Starry Night" when it goes into mainspace.Aleister 23:32 17-2-'12

You and your wooooooooooooooords. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Feb 18 '12 7:16 (UTC)

• For. RegularUndies . 10:20, February 26, 2012 (UTC)

TimmyTom (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom This n00b participated in the Happy Monkey competition and wrote User:TimmyTom/UnBooks:Still beefy: The autobiography of Beefy McManstick. Note the n00bishness when dealing with pics, he'll learn :) Great job, TimmyTom! Mattsnow 17:19, February

14, 2012 (UTC)

• Nomination seconded TIMMY TOM TOM TOMMY TIM TIMMY TOM TOM TOM. This guy did a more than reasonable job with such a difficult topic and little experience on the site. That he stay here forever and prosper in the TIM of the TOMMY TIM TIMMY TIM TOM TOM TOMMY LALALALAALA! --ShabiDOO 19:24, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Rainchild (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom This n00b too participated in the Happy Monkey competition and wrote Saturday (day of the week). Note the n00bishness of writing it directly on his userpage! Hilarious article! Mattsnow 17:19, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
• Nomination seconded This nOOb turned out a VERY promising entry for the competition and a lot of extra promising promise for the future of promiscuity!!! --ShabiDOO 19:24, February 14, 2012 (UTC)

Writer of the Month

Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9

• Three reasons: 1. He got robbed of WotY by a Welshman and some skinny poofter; 2. He's just had one hell of a month; and 3. he said he'd buy me alcohol if I did this. --Black Flamingo 21:29, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Hey, hey, hey! 15Mickey20 did Vladimir Putin. How dare you! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Feb 3 '12 21:38 (UTC)
    • I always assumed that TKF was the skinny poofter around here. Yeah...TFK writes some pretty awsome articles. And once in a while, his writing makes me laugh out loud really hard. --ShabiDOO 22:06, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
      • He made a cow laugh hard, once. Real hard. So hard that cum came out her snout. (It was his cum. Think about it a minute. You'll figure it out.) ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Feb 3 '12 22:10 (UTC)
  • Flamingo is right: Vladimir Putin is a fantastic article and you should all vote for it now. Also, thanks guys. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:48, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
• And, yeah, if not TKF, I dunno who. Also: TKF, I hate you. Accept this vote as a token of my disgust for you. Cow fucker. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Feb 3 '12 22:10 (UTC)
• For. The only playa that got robbed but kept all his jewelry. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:34, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

*For. Nigga writes good. Mattsnow 22:48, February 3, 2012 (UTC) Changed my mind, nigga needs some competition! :) Mattsnow 23:24, February 5, 2012 (UTC)

• For. I would usually vote no, as I don't generally approve of giving awards like this out more than once, but this dude deserved WotY. -- 23:53, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
• For. -RAHB 00:08, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Not to make a habit of this, there are plenty of people to elect from the old timers committee, but there is no better choice to get a second of these trophies than TKF. What a month and year, and his hat-trick on Milton Babbitt carries the award forward all by itself. Aleister 22:00 5-2-'12

  Damn I wanna give Winstanley an honorary something-or-other. His WotM-less existence is the biggest black eye on this site's legitimacy. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:20, February 6, 2012 (UTC)

  Since this award has traditionally been like a Hall of Fame vote, no reason why the people I listed can't be awarded it at some point. Two of them have a combined total of 50,000 UnNews articles, if memory serves. Aleister 15:40 7-2-'12

  Go for it. Previous deserving winners such as MadMax and Chiefjustice are in the same pedal-boat. --Black Flamingo 16:08, February 7, 2012 (UTC)

• Fo if only for Rapto-velocity. However that would ignore the talent this man has in turning his passion for music into a source of true comedy, of which C. Mingus is just the lastest example. --Nikau 14:21, February 6, 2012 (UTC)
• For. I can't remember the last time I actually voted for any TKF article, there must be a couple I read and voted in favour before uncovering the author behind it. Still, TKF did inspire my regular Filial Piety description for any writer who relentless re-submits an article in the hope that Commeth the Time, Commeth the Votes, Commeth the Front Page. So for that, he can have the rosette this month. Uncyclopedia would be a duller place without the croaker. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:04, February 15, 2012 (UTC)
• For. May the farce be with you, Froggy--Funnybony  11:04, Feb 29

Shabidoo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5

• Nom and for Really great humor style, it's different. It makes the wiki a lot better to have different styles of featured article and this guy has features which are pretty unique in regards to their style. Bad things have happened recently comes to mind, but there's lots of other great articles written by this peculiar buffoon. Mattsnow 23:18, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
• His grammar and formatting tend to be horrible, but the rest tends to be surprisingly good. And he's done a fair amount, too, so that has to count for something.

1234 ~ 06:53, 8 February 2012

• Lrithya ... being brutally honest as usual eh? Anyway, nobody paid me to vote for him!!! --POP!GoesTheWeasel 06:17, February 10, 2012 (UTC)
• For. RegularUndies . 10:23, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
• Next month I'm voting for Shabidoo--Funnybony  11:11, Feb 29
• For. Writes the funnies. The incredibly convoluted and bizarre funnies. --Chiefjustice32X 11:13, February 29, 2012 (UTC)

Winstanley1 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom so people can bask in his writing, and to get him into the que. Old Timers Committee nom. Aleister 3:56 10-2-'12
• Dictation, UnBooks:Tarquin Middleton: My Battle with Depression., Blandford, Shabalov Vs Areshchenko, UnBooks:Only Business, Conceptual Art, and a host of other prime things. A golden age writer during the Golden Age who never got his due. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:20, February 10, 2012 (UTC)

Jocke Pirat (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom Another old timer committee nom -- and an idea, maybe an "Old Timers Committee" nom can be put up next month with four or five names lumped together -- for an award which should have stood on his mantel or bedroom dresser long ago. Apparantly one of the classy players here, I haven't read all his pages but he has lots and lots (7.5) of features and likely many more should-have-beens. Aleikster 21:50 12-2-'12

  And not an old-timer, a young-timer, but I just looked and MrN9000 hasn't won this yet either. As I write this he's rescuing many of the fix-tag pages, and hopefully is going to add to his seven features, plus all the other pages he's worked on. Aleister 5:05 16-2-'12

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Joe9320 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

1. Joe took the cake last month by initiating and inspiring us to join in the protest, ah, protect-SOPA holiday. On top of that, he has years of creating forums, mischief, urging other users to do more and more, and has kept alive unspeakable things within uncyclopedia. On top of all that, another wtfhhwty? winner. Yay Joe! Aleister 13:08 1-2-'12
2. Yada yada yada. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill | 05:38, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
3. For Any user hat lasts more thana month wins this be default. He's also cool and Australian. So for. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:41, February 2, 2012 (UTC)
4. lolFor. Though his attempts to better Uncyclopedia and bring it into the new age are most often ridiculous, half-baked and misguided, they're attempts all the same. That counts for something, right? -RAHB 03:24, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

   Exactly! And every once in awhile he hits a home run, like the SOPA protest. Aleister 3:35 3-2-'12

   Yeah. I wasn't here for that so I'll take your word for it. -RAHB 03:43, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

5. For.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 11:39, February 3, 2012 (UTC)

Villahj Ideeut (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7

• Nom and for. Having recently returned from a several-year hiatus to fix a couple of the site's scripts (you know, those things you see under the heading 'gadgets' in the user preferences, which actually are somehow still there even after Wikia completely mangled said preferences), this guy in his absence has done more for the wiki than... well, most anyone, let alone the textbook gobshites. How many people have used the auto-qvfd and auto-ban patrol and auto-tags scripts? Who has used or uses the real-time recent changes? Even if you do not know his name, you know his scripts (or the derivations thereof).

1234 ~ 03:40, 3 February 2012

• Strong For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 05:48, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why has he never won why -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 11:38, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
• for. His qvfd stuff is so useful. Mattsnow 13:33, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Hmm, two always-the-bridesmaids, but this guy is just so useful. --Black Flamingo 21:13, February 3, 2012 (UTC)
• Real for. -RAHB 00:06, February 4, 2012 (UTC)
• For --Knucmo2 23:18, February 14, 2012 (UTC)
• Against- wait, can you? |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill | 08:58, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
• Villahj Ideeut is my best friend. We grew up together in a boarding school in Luxembourg under the patronage of Prof. Wiskers McMittens. So ... that's why I'm voting for him here. Congratulations Villahj Ideeut, I always knew you would go places. :') --ShabiDOO 23:27, February 22, 2012 (UTC)

March 2012

Noob of the month

Tasmania (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +7

• I don't give a fuck, if he hasn't written any articles (although he should), he helps do shit like reverting vandals and other unpleasant rubbish. And he's been registered what? 25 days? He should definitely have this. A+++ ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:25, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Fuck NotM in general, but this guy is the shit. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 09:10, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Almost word-for-word per TKF – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 06:52 Mar 03, 2012
• Invalid nom; doesn't meet the requirements. Suggest more meat. Also suggest that if you feel he should win this, perhaps you should do something about the requirements. Good day.

1234 ~ 04:09, 9 March 2012

• There was no rule about article number when you posted that, TKF had already changed them, so I say he is eligible technically. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:56, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

  Yeah he's still eligible for sure. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:09, March 9, 2012 (UTC)

• For. I haven't been following what's going on in that forum about NotM. Probably something incredibly stupid...At any rate, Taz is a right good guy. -RAHB 23:26, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
• For Apparantly Tasmania fixed my signature...without asking me. He/she just went ahead and fixed it...so it didn't have any problems...or something of that nature. Without asking me!!! --ShabiDOO 23:31, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
• For Picking up things at just the right speed. Looks like we have a good user here. MrN  Fork you! 00:42, Mar 14
• For. Works with care and interest, and has made uncyclopedia a better place to visit. The crazy vandal chose him to attack, and Tasmania brushed him off like he would a large tasmanian spider. A fine user! Aleister 1:12 21-3-'12

Flymousechiu (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nomination Shows a decent ability to write. Pup 06:49 03 Mar '12
• For. A good guy and a promising writer. This one is a keeper. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   20:59, March 11, 2012 (UTC)

Dorianin (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nomination Good sense of humour and happy to help out. Pup 06:49 03 Mar '12

Qzekrom (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Nomination Given he has finally named himself, and he showed promise as an IP, he should be here. Pup 06:49 03 Mar '12
• For. They're all great n00bs, but this one's paws and hair are awesome. Mattsnow 20:08, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Though I banned him in his I.P. days as regards Pi edit wars, he took the advice to get registered. Shows promise. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:41, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
• Wow, thanks. -- This has been an automated message by Cute Zekrom (talk) 00:15, March 11, 2012 (UTC)
• For. I love Pokemon! |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill | 06:02, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual yessiree Qzekrom has so much on the ball that if he were just a little smarter he'd be dangerous to the status quo. Not of uncyclopedia, but of his country! Aleister 1:16 21-3-'12

GarethPW (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nomination Some natural skill here. Pup 06:49 03 Mar '12

TimmyTom (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nomination Good entry in the Happy Monkey.  Pup 06:49 03 Mar '12

Rainchild (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nomination Likewise good entry in the Happy Monkey.  Pup 06:49 03 Mar '12

ThatGuyThatEdits (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nomination Someone who has been going around and cleaning up stupid from articles under the radar.  Pup 06:49 03 Mar '12

Änjelajs (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom Given that stupid 30 +/- is done away with, yet another new contributor who would have previously been excluded due to half a dozen earlier edits. Pup 11:50 08 Mar '12
• Down with the stupid 30 rule thingy. Anjelajs...good noob. Though...has never responded to anything left on talk page. Good happy monkey first article. --ShabiDOO 04:35, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
  • Responded to me on my talkpage. Pup 04:43 09 Mar '12
• By obvious reasons, for. I'm back from my vacation now and will start edit again. Änjelajs (talk) 13:44, March 28, 2012 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the month

Joe9320 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• Nom&For Joe's long service here has brought a new Summer Classic contest, our participation in the protest to save SOPA, many interesting and useful ideas and mucho fun and helpful moments. Yay Joe9320! Aleister 16:00 2-3-'12
• For. I concur. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:20, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Truth be told, Uncyc already has too many contests and really doesn't need more and more. Really lessens the impact of each one after a while. But this Joenumbers guy is pretty cool regardless. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:03, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
  • Changed to Against because he voted for himself and that's a pretty good indicator what what Lyrithya said. We should award this based on fulfilled merit; nomming Joe this month, when he's still far from his moment in the sun, feels undeserving. Merely acting in good faith should not be enough. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:06, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
• I really love Joe's voice on this website. He gets to the point, funny points and certainly never hesitates to express his view. Sometimes his view is a little puzzling, other times its clear as can be, but I never see bad intent or gudge holding or petty nonsense from this guy. He really cares about keeping content on the wiki instead of whole sale burning, and he also cares about promoting the site re:TKF's new campaign. The contest that he held wasn't the most amazing in the history of the wiki, but keep in mind, it was a lot of fun for the users who worked in a group to spit out an article together, and that encouraged colaboration and a fun competitive experience. Also, Joe has one of the biggest nipples in the entire Eastern Hemisphere according to him, which was stated, somewhere on someones page sometime, or maybe not. --ShabiDOO 21:38, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
• For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:19, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Not now. As much as I adore the abusefilter, I'ma have to be serious for a bit and say no here - Joe9320 has always been, for lack of a better word, one of Uncyclopedia's pet gobshites, over the years putting forth considerable idiocy and nonsense and generally making a mess of things wherever he goes. Unlike most of them, however, he has usually kept it confined to BHOP and userspace, so rarely was all that problematic, and so he's still here. The weird thing is, though, of late, he actually has been improving in terms of usefulness. Some of his forum posts have touched on actual issues, and he has also done three reviews this past month that, while not exactly in-depth, do show considerable potential, as well as some random mainspace edits that don't seem all that bad. Should this trend continue, I could definitely see this award well-earned by this fellow in a few months, and he would have our thanks for that - useful is useful; he's just not entirely there yet. Seriously, please, Joe, continue in this vein and clean up Uncyclopedia and generally make it tidy, and not only will you have earned these possibly shiny awards, but the site will be better off for it.

1234 ~ 01:12, 3 March 2012

• Changed to comment.

1234 ~ 20:53, 7 March 2012

• Against per Lyrithya. Also I'm not sure if I get one vote, or one for vote and multiple against votes, or something of that sort, but I'm sure you can all get it sorted out with the minimum amount of shouting. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 01:46 Mar 03, 2012

  Is there a precidence for voting "AGAINST" users on uncyclopedian of the month? The rules state vote for the candidate you feel is most deserving ...nothing about voting "against" them and certainly nothing about nominating a non-user (the abuse filter) so you can take a cheap shot at Joe. --ShabiDOO 01:51, March 3, 2012 (UTC)

  Then you may consider me an innovator. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 17:34 Mar 05, 2012

• Spiritual for As much as I appreciate Lyrithya and Skully's points here, I have to vote for due to one major reason - Joe works toward the good of the wiki. I disagree with most of what he says, but at times he comes out with some gems, and he keeps on trying to make us better. Pup 01:30 03 Mar '12
• For, because through studying the ways of Uncyclopedia, I can recognise how to make good articles. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill | 09:27, March 4, 2012 (UTC)

  One vote, mon.

1234 ~ 17:33, 5 March 2012

• For. Since when can we vote against a nomination for an award? Just nominate another person then! Joe did a good job of scoring the Happy Monkey tournament. Mattsnow 22:58, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
• For. --Chiefjustice32X 13:50, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
• Discussion has been moved to the talk page, this page is for votes. The talk page is, surprisingly, for talking. --Chiefjustice32X 22:58, March 5, 2012 (UTC)

Electrified mocha chinchilla (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nommin' this guy. He's on the precipice of a major comeback, I feels. Firstly, we now have him to thank for a much improved Welcome template. If he committed himself once again to rewriting the faulty parts of BGBU, then pretty soon we'll find all of our new user literature dedicated to this gentleman. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:55, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
• I can't vote for emc enough. Beyond a doubt, he is one of the most hard-working Uncyclopedians, even if his contributions are more off-site than on-site. He's responsible for Uncyclopedia's image across various social networks, he's the only one working on BGBU, and he's generally one of the best users around. Frankly we don't deserve him. However, I'll go with a spiritual for for now, since he no doubt realizes voting against the fuckery above is more important right now. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 17:30 Mar 05, 2012

Tasmania (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• A new guy, but has caught on remarkably quickly to the day-by-day maintenance of the site. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:03, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual for Given he's already in line for NotM, and challenging for Perv of the Month, he's proving himself fast. Pup 12:11 05 Mar '12
• He has me at "Map of Tasmania". |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill | 07:27, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual for Already used my vote, but yeah great guy. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:13, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual for My spirit knows that Tasmania has excelled. Aleister 2:40 23-3-'12

Scofield (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Remember this guy? He votes on VFH, does reviews sometimes, writes things, tries to improve features, puts forth intelligent suggestions on forums, formats things, and is generally not terribly assuming until you get in an argument with him, but I don't think anyone has of late. And he hasn't even won this yet.

1234 ~ 17:33, 5 March 2012

• Spiritual for (like a ghost or something) Good choice, I didn't know he hadn't won yet. A great nom. Maybe this nom will bring him back for awhile. Aleister 18:04 5-3-'12

• A very, very belated Thank You For. --Scofield & Friends 06:02, March 19, 2012 (UTC)

Oliphaunte (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9

• And what about this guy? He's one of the most useful people I've seen around here of late. Does reviews, writes, votes, gives actual feedback on things... perhaps it's easy to assume he already got this, but he hasn't.

1234 ~ 18:08, 5 March 2012

• Switching to a Strong For for this guy. Voting against really felt dickish and dirty, as I know it was, but I completely stood behind Lyrithya's line of reasoning that if we award UotM to a user in the process of improving, as opposed to accomplishing, then it is only a badge of complacency. Oliphaunte, on the other hand, is in my eyes a full-blown bona-fide shockingly-yet-unawarded model-of-a-modern-great-Uncyclopedian. And 'tis always better to have a strong reason to For than Against. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:12, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
• For Oliphaunte is great. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:57, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
• Although I have been surprised with the (more) helpful and mature attitude Joe has been flirting with recently, I am more surprised that Oliphaunte - who has been nothing but mature and helpful since he first asked me to adopt him - hasn't won this yet. As a rollbacker with a handful of great articles, and several handfuls of even greater pee reviews, I just gots to vote for him. --Black Flamingo
• For. I understand and I wish to continue. . 11:17, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
• For..--Funnybony  11:21, Mar 7
• For Must switch to this guy. As everyone has been saying, Joe is on his way to this award and may well be suitable in a couple of months. For now it has to be Oliphaunte. He's so crazy. --Chiefjustice32X 11:28, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
• Actual for. Per nomination and what TKF said.

1234 ~ 20:53, 7 March 2012

• I thought he had already gotten this. -- 05:15, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
• I also assumed that he had won this. He just seems like a classic user. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:38, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

Funnybony (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• A big FOR this guy. How the hell hasn't he etc. Pup 03:57 07 Mar '12
• Man, he's so awesome. Does wonderful things to many topics others wouldn't even think of...

1234 ~ 20:53, 7 March 2012

• • Another Spiritual For, spirits either have or rent multiple viewpoints Funnybony has given me so much pleasure and assistance here, what a guy! Aleister 21:01 7-3-'12

For. He was nice to me once. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   17:21, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

• Spiritual fence sitting. Did anyone know this guys is close to 500 articles? There isn't a single shitty on either! Funnybony is one of those awsome non-talk-page-jumping quietly doing stuff behind the scenes uncylopedian! --ShabiDOO 17:40, March 10, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual For. I hadn't realised FB hadn't got this. For the veteran plank spanker next month. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:40, March 13, 2012 (UTC)

Writer of the month

Shabidoo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Nom + For On my list of people who haven't won this award but should have by now. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:25, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For Because we save the best for the last. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 07:09, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
• Yeah, though he's gross sometimes.

1234 ~ 07:46, 7 March 2012

• For. I understand and I wish to continue. . 11:17, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual against A solid No vote, in spirit. I soundly chastize all of you unthinking voters who vote for this dick. He just decided to finally enter the Hall of Shame, plopped up an entry with 9 features on it, and whistled as he walked away. Whistled! Aleister 12:39 7-3-'12
• Spectural against the against He deserves it more after he's got his next one. Which is likely to be over the next few days, really. Pup 12:01 08 Mar '12
• Shabidoo is a great teller of jokes, especially for a non-native English speaker, but his writing in my eye is still a few steps and scrapings away from finding its true zenith of quality. He's definitely discovered his voice and tone, and it's a fecking hilarious and consistent deal at that, but often his prose is overly wordy or grammatically lacking. A bit more ironing out is needed before I could rightly support Shabidoo for this internet writing trophy. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:02, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

  For the record, it would be exagerating to call me a "non-native" like Socky or Mimo, as per some of my roots and early education and having lived in Canada and the UK and blah blah blah. It's been a long long time since I've been in an Anglo saxon enviroment and I appreciate you guys a LOT LOT LOT for the corrections and editing and helping bringing back to me my coloquial English. So yeah, big thanks guys! --ShabiDOO 23:22, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

• FOR Mattsnow 23:29, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

MrN9000 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 8

• Nomfor My partner in crime on Mohandas Gandhi, MrN9000 has 7.5 features and counting, and then there are the hundreds of other pages he's either written, greatly improved upon, or given advice on. Being voted Writer of the Month is a ticket to get laid, and as much as I like Shabidoo, he has no hope even with that. Aleister 11:02 5-3-'12
• Agai- no, wait, I mean For There are so many featured articles with his fingerprints on that he should have had this ages ago. Pup 12:11 07 Mar '12
• Oh, I thought he'd already gotten this. You know, because he's good and stuff.

1234 ~ 23:57, 7 March 2012

• For. As much as I enjoy reading Shabidoo's articles I have to vote for MrN this month. He has been instrumental in creating far more features than he is credited with. This guy. --Chiefjustice32X 08:09, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
• For, MrN9000 smells like pudding. In a good way. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:50, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
• Hell to the fucking yes please -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:59, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Wanker.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:18, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
• Per everybody above. Maybe Shabidoo can win it next month. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:27, 8 March 2012
• Thanks for the lol moments:
  • There is a human heart inside each of them that's painted gold.
  • POINTLESS PARADOX: Oh dear, I hadn't thought of that.
  • Adam could not always be bothered to make the eight hour commitment required to ensure she creamed her pants every-time he did
  • --ShabiDOO 23:56, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
• comment: Is there a way to get a list of MrN9000's featured articles? (he's a modest guy and doesn't show them on his userpage) --ShabiDOO 23:23, March 8, 2012 (UTC)

  The Color Problem, Battle of the Sexes, HowTo:Turn Your Terminator On (With Cajek), The Pun Invasion of Uncyclopedia, Fish Puns (With Under user), Why?:Do a Pee Review (With Cajek), Pointless Paradox, Clementine Attlee (with Mhaille), Neighborhood Watch (with Multiliteralist, MadMax, Electrified mocha chinchilla), December 21, 2012 (with Funnybony), Mohandas Gandhi (with Aleister) -from HoS Pup 11:33 08 Mar '12

• For. Worked with Mr N on a number of recovery articles e.g. Cricket and Formula One. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:51, March 16, 2012 (UTC)

Aleister in Chains (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom + For He's created dozens of exceptional articles. He's also put so much brainstorming into creating articles for Uncyclopedia. He's currently number 1 on my list for the top writers, and is the most diligent writer, I've seen in some time. -- UserTalkContributions 00:23, March 10, 2012 (UTC)

  Thanks for the nice words, all compliments gratefully accepted. I've won this award before, and it is traditionally a one-time thing, sort of like a writer's Hall of Blame, ah, Shame, ah, Fame, for uncyclopedia, unless you do something really extraordinary like Thekillerfroggy and DrStrange did (I'd give it to Doc for Gay Jesus alone). There's less than 100 of them, and many good writers haven't won yet. Some are nommed this month, and there are some old-timer's committee noms which could be made. Lots of good writers here now, and many in the past, all rated top writers. Man, have you read UnBooks:The Night I Slept with Björk by The Thinker? Whoa. Thanks though, now go vote for someone else. Aleister 1:28 10-3-'12

• Sp 4 Definite gobshite of the month. (Am I voting in the right place?) Pup 01:16 10 Mar '12

April 2012

Writer of the Month

Shabidoo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +10

1. Nome & Fore Shabidoo is a very good, in-depth, and fast lover, ah, writer, who encourages other writers and lovers to excel at what they do. And when he entered the HOS a few weeks ago, he causually put up 9 features. And he has walked the streets of Laredo! Aleister 10:18 2-4-'12
2. For. Per the thing I said last month. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:23, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. I compliment him too much, so I won't say anything. Mattsnow 10:57, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
4. For, no, er, um, Against, no, uh, whatever it is that adds a vote.                                • Puppy's talk page • 12:52 02 Apr
5. For.--Funnybony  22:21, Apr 3
6. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:28, 3 April 2012
7. Yep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:25, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. I've been missing for a few months because of college and when I came back, I was expecting Shabidoo to be Writer of The Month. Well now, I hope he wins it. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 15:56, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
9. I have no idea what any of his article are about but the crazy made-up language they're written in makes me laugh. --Black Flamingo 16:25, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
10. For. Shabidoo, not related to Scooby-Doo or Scrappy-Doo. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:39, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

Noob of the Moment

XDshempXD (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7

1. Nom & For XDshempXD, or shemp for those who have oxen, has already written many good pages. Lines in some of her fangirl articles on Roberto Carlos Braga gave me my two biggest laughs of the month. Yay! Aleister 10:29 2-4-'12
2. Good writing at a rapid fire rate. Reminds me of a young Funnybony.                                • Puppy's talk page • 10:33 02 Apr
3. Mhmmm. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:36, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
4. Nice attitude. Mattsnow 10:52, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
5. FOR. I vote myself, because I am definitely nooby. hehehehehe. -- the dorky contralto 17:58, April 22, 2012 (UTC)
6. Fuck yeah! Talented fella whose personality shines through in his writing. I won't be surprised if we see Shemp nominated for some other awards, given a few more months to hone his style. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:09, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

I am a she. :) -- the dorky contralto 21:33, April 24, 2012 (UTC)

Fuck! I always know I'm gonna mess up with the pronouns! I still stand by my vote, though. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 12:54, April 26, 2012 (UTC)

• For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:55, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

Alpha Quintesson (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 8

• Nom and for. He patrols recent changes like a shark in a jelly fish tank. Very useful user. Mattsnow 03:05, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Really good with vandals. -- UserTalkContributions 05:00, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:17, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Started really well but will need a ban to be fully bloodied like everyone else. Sorry, only joking Alpha but if you check the block logs you will see nearly everyone has sat on the naughty step here at some time or other. Some very much more than others. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:29, April 16, 2012 (UTC)
• OK, has well earned this, churning out work day after day. Alpha has lived up to his name. Aleister 17:43 26-4-'12
• Yesh. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Apr 27 '12 1:59 (UTC)
• What a n00b for feeding teh trollz.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 10:55, April 29, 2012 (UTC)
• For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:55, April 30, 2012 (UTC)

Mockingbird ST (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9

• N&F Have a read of counting to potato. The guy/girl/artificial intelligence is a natural.                                • Puppy's talk page • 06:39 05 Apr
• for I don't know if we can have multiple votes for this new award, but yes, this bird is promising as hell. Mattsnow 07:11, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
  • One vote per n00b, but can vote for as many n00bs as you like. Or, in short, yes, you can.                                • Puppy's talk page • 07:56 06 Apr
• Counting to potato is just hysterical! A very promising writer. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:33, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
• This guy has the most promise. --ShabiDOO 23:29, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
• With a name like Mocking how can he miss? Nice work. Aleister 23:45 8-4-'12
• For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:41, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
• F☭R 13:44, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
• For. --Black Flamingo 16:29, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
• He's a good one, he is. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:09, April 22, 2012 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Funnybony (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 13

• FOR One of the quiet heroes of Uncyclopedia. --ShabiDOO 00:04, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Dude! Most of us just realized last month that Funnybony hasn't won this yet. He has sheparded so many users and done so many things here that I have a glass held high and other things held table level in appreciation of this great user. Aleister 00:25 2-4-'12
• For. Per Al, but smuttier.                                • Puppy's talk page • 12:41 02 Apr
• For. Great writing artist. Mattsnow 01:24, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
• How has he not won this? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:31, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Yeah this guy. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:58, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
• Yeah what that^ guy said. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   03:52, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
• For. I have so many fond memories of speaking to him about his articles and not understanding a single word. --Chiefjustice32X 09:51, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Instead of voting for, I contrived to delete the page earlier. Apologies! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:32, April 9, 2012 (UTC)

  Well, the ICU had expired...                                • Puppy's talk page • 09:53 09 Apr

• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:25, April 10, 2012 (UTC)
• F☭R 13:43, April 14, 2012 (UTC)
• Rock 'n' roll! --Black Flamingo 16:27, April 21, 2012 (UTC)
• Lovely bloke, pleasure to talk to, writes swell, and is often happy to help with all of our content woes. I like him.

1234 ~ 21:59, 21 April 2012

Sycamore (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• I'm not meaning to create drama, I just wanted to mention Sycamore here, and give the runaway train that is April's Funnybony a tiny smidge of competition. Sycamore sweeps up a lot on RC and welcomes newbs. That makes him a better man than I. I hate the little buggers. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Apr 25 '12 7:12 (UTC)

May 2012

Writer of the Month

Jocke Pirat (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 8

1. Nom de fleur. Although Mr. Pirat could have been nominated from the Old Timer's Committee, he gained a half-feature in April for Ron Paul to go with his eight other features. Sir Jocke was here before my time, so others can better sing his praises, but I've run across his work enough in my wanderings to say that this award is well-deserved and is as overdue as Lindsay Lohan making a good movie. Hats off to a fine fellow. Aleister 9:36 3-5-'12
2. for. Mattsnow 11:52, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
3. Yo Jocke come back and shit, you were pretty funny. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:57, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
4. Strong For. I'm surprised that Jocke hasn't won this yet. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:41, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
5. For.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:33, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
6. For. Classic user. Should have won by now. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:15, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. --Black Flamingo 23:05, May 8, 2012 (UTC)
8. For. Never heard of him. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:16, May 9, 2012 (UTC)

C₂H₆O (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Confirmed sockpuppet. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:36, May 8, 2012 (UTC)

1. Nom + Strong For One of very few users that actually re-write articles to be fixed, and is actually attempting to fix them all. New, witty and already has many re-writes and I expect more to come. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:30, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

   Potentially one of the greats. But he got here 9 days ago. What if he gets 20 votes today and then is gone tomorrow? Can we at least wait a month before he wins this? Or not. Aleister 11:22 6-5-'12

   Yes, he is awesome, really, but let's give him a bit of time. What if he dies of alcohol poisoning tomorrow? Mattsnow 11:52, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

   While I can assure you I'd be there for the award ceremony, and for the after party, my movements beyond that point may be a little more random. Or recumbent. --C₂H₆O (hic) 12:23, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

2. Spiritual For. Great new writer, showing much promise. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:15, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

PopGoesTheWeasel (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

1. Nom + Spiritual For Was here briefly (too briefly) and write several articles that mae me laugh. Hopefully he'll come back to write much more. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:30, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

Weebils (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

1. Nom and Spiritual For and For sure next month. I must confess a horrible thing - up until just now I've been unaware of Weebil's work here except for his huge number of past UnNews pages (one of only three users with 200+ UnNews pages), or didn't associate a page with a name. Now that I've checked out his user page, it's like, WTF, and then I finally read a few of his pages, and it's WTF!!! and you know what, I think almost everybody here has ignored him as much as I have. Because if not, if we hadn't ignored him, he would have had won WotM years ago, proabably would have easily had 40 or many more pages featured instead of none, and we would have seen that he is totally in love with this place and hugs it like a Teddy Bear because he see it as so good and fun to play in. Weebils last won anything, the Foolitzer Prize, a long time ago. I really didn't know him from Adam until about an hour ago, although I have nominated him for WotM in the past and have him on a list of "WTF he hasn't won this yet?" users. Aleister 22:48 8-5-'12
2. For. Prolific--Funnybony  09:51, May 18
3. Weebils! --ShabiDOO 18:06, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
4. For.Excellent choice in my opinion. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 15:01, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
5. Why the fuck is this guy not winning? I read these guys stuff and made me giggle to the point of falling off my chair without the assistance of weed and scotch. Seriously this guy is funny! --MasterWangs CUNT and proud of it! 06:40, May 26, 2012 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Alpha Quintesson (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6

• Nom + for: He seems to be our new #2 vandal-reverter and cleanup dude after our immortal Frosty, of course, who labors along without appreciation and is forever doomed to obscurity, but I digress. He seems like he may be a cool dude. The next Frosty? Perhaps? Who knows! Heck, he may even be able to write, I'm not sure. Haven't checked. What am I blithering on about... ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, May 1 '12 13:04 (UTC)
• For. No fuss, no dramas, no hissing on talk pages...if he is kind to cats too, I would not be surprised. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:02, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
• For. A super month during April, he lives up to his name (first one anyway, I don't know what the second one means. Roman?) Aleister 17:08 May Day '12

  [1] ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:11, May 6, 2012 (UTC)

• For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:45, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
• For -RAHB 07:48, May 25, 2012 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:39, 25 May 2012

Sycamore (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Nom: Yes, he has won this before. So what? He reverts vandals, does cleanup, and is also a tree. Hard to beat that. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, May 1 '12 13:04 (UTC)
• Deserves credit, not just for the shit he does all the time, but for his Nostradamus-like foretelling of the previous months dramatic shitstorm. Sycamore is supernatural. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:42, May 3, 2012 (UTC)
  • Thanks to both of you for your kind words. There's no edict for winning twice - but it can be an encouragement to up an coming users rather than oldies--Sycamore (Talk) 21:38, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
• For.. Deserves it twice. Bravo!--Funnybony  12:07, May 18
• Never talked to to him in my 9 days here but I will be sure to tell him how awesome he is. Just wow or whatever the expression may be. --MasterWangs CUNT and proud of it! 10:52, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

Simsilikesims (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom: Yes, she has won this before. She reverts vandals and shit, and is also an admin on the mirror site. We should give her this award to encourage her to stick around here and have less of a life. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, May 1 '12 13:04 (UTC)

Tasmania (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom: How the bloody devil could I forget Tasmania? He hasn't been around as much this past month, but lookit this guy's cleanup record, it's bizarre. How does the fellow do so much, anyway? Is he a bot? He is, isn't he? I'm embarrassing myself by nominating a bot, aren't I? Oh, well. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, May 1 '12 13:11 (UTC)
• They're all good, but Tazz is my choice. Mattsnow 16:37, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
• For.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:34, May 6, 2012 (UTC)
• Spiritual for. Would vote for if he still edited rather than idling on IRC 24/7. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:21, May 12, 2012 (UTC)

PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• I thought of nomming him for this yesterday, but that would have looked like a comment on the VFS horse race (when the full horse race article comes out it's probably going to be amazing) which it is not. Now that people are nomming others to be the first two-time winner of this award, gotta go with Puppy. On his merits.

In the past couple of months Puppy has done over 20 pee reviews, worked up codes for the wiki which has improved it (I think, I'm not a code guy), helped all the people who came to him, organized and began writing and getting featured the 10 most important topics on an encyclopedic wiki! He then backflipped over to the starting line and played with and tried to advance the discussion of some of the most important topics in forums, user talk spaces, and his own talk space while at the same time going over the 30 feature mark...and there's lots more, that was just the start of what he's done in the past two months. So this is a nom on merits and not on drama (which is a high and honored art form when done well). Aleister 14:20 May Day '12

Not really a great Uncyclopedian in light of recent events, he's also serving a ban. These helps you "describe" only bred the hubris that has swamped this community with drama, sockpuppetry and asshattery over the past few weeks. Surely Puppy must go into the wilderness and return changed for the better or not at all - not get rewarded with a nomination?--Sycamore (Talk) 14:43, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

Next time. Aleister, I totally agree with you that Puppy is invaluable in many many ways. I'll vote for puppy when he's back, without storm clouds on the horizon and when he's at his typical super helpful best. --ShabiDOO 14:59, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

People seem to be voting based on the drama. This isn't about the drama, that's the drama, this is for merit. If Puppy wants this closed I'll do it, this wasn't the place to relive the drama again, it's to recognize him for his contributions to the uncy over the past month or two. Which are pretty awesome. And so are Frosty's - the two aussies put on quite a four-pint show, pip pip, jugging a pitcher of Foster's and a pint of the kangaroo rum. Aleister 16:27 May Day '12

Ali, I dislike the word drama. It can be used to discredit peoples complaints (god...stop with the drama already) when they actually have valid arguments, or to discard disruptive behaviour (you're only focusing on drama) when the persons has actually blown tension all out of proportion. I'll vote for puppy some month in the future when he is at his total and utter best, when he's one of the stars of uncyclopedia again, with pleasure. --ShabiDOO 16:41, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

Drama, withdrawing the non-drama nom. Can we keep UofM to a one-time win award? Nobody's won it twice, and there's no need to do that with the quality of the newer people around. Aleister 17:06 May Day '12

Thanks for the nom. Thanks for wihdrawing the nom.                                • Puppy's talk page • 01:47 07 May

I like the UotM only once idea. Mostly because I won it once and I'll never win it again because I don't do anything here anymore, so why should anybody else? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 18:40, May 12, 2012 (UTC)

Mr-ex777 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom. Despite his strange work ethic (meaning his obsession with vandals of years gone by) he actually does pretty useful stuff to, namely on QVFD, VFD and BP. He also uses rollback fairly well and helps with general wiki maintenance. Next month I'll vote for him (as I've voted for Alpha already) but he's a useful and nice fellow. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:24, May 10, 2012 (UTC)
• Same here. I like to make fun of him on IRC, but he does seem like an affable goofball, and he does do "stuff", and is "usefull", so he'll get my voet next month. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, May 10 '12 10:18 (UTC)
• Yeah, I think the same. He keeps IRC interesting, is delightfully eccentric, and when he's not accusing people of being meepsheep is a very nice guy, particularly in that he takes nothing at all too seriously. -RAHB 07:51, May 25, 2012 (UTC)

June 2012

N00b of the moment

Gabriel Turner (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 13

1. For. Appears to be getting involved with the site in a good way. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:55, May 18, 2012 (UTC)
2. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:01, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
3. For. Was on the verge of nominating him for this recently; he has made a good number of vandal-reverting edits. --Alpha Quintesson (talk) 06:38, May 19, 2012 (UTC)
4. For. --Chiefjustice32X 10:08, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
5. Good boy *pats Gabriel Turner. --Black Flamingo 11:59, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
6. For. His name is splattered all over recent changes and he never gets reverted, so he must be doing something good. Welcome aboard! :) Mattsnow 19:00, May 20, 2012 (UTC)
7. For. Sorry Wang, you're a good noob and all but this guy has a strong sense of pride and responsibility. Maybe I should poop on his lawn too. --POP!GoesTheWeasel 12:30, May 23, 2012 (UTC)

   The rules have changed since (I assume) you last voted; you can vote for both if you want now! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 14:03, May 23, 2012 (UTC)

8. For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:12, 23 May 2012
9. Woooo this dude rulez -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 14:03, May 23, 2012 (UTC)
10. I've seen fire and I've seen rain, but I always thought I'd see Gabriel Turner again. Aleister a moment ago in geological time
11. Gabriel has passed the first stage of acession into the uncyclopedia clan. The future for him is wrought with many more challenges and danger, and it is unlikely he will complete it with his health and sanity intact, but that is the price you pay for total and utter awsomeness. That is the price. --ShabiDOO 05:32, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
12. FOR! Soft spot for Clint Eastwood and you nailed it. Ticklethekeys (talk) 10:08, June 18, 2012 (UTC)
13. The only one of the three noobs I know (have been gone for a month), and well deserved awardeded to him. Yay Mr. Turner! Aleister 16:06 27-6-'12

Writer of the Month

Weebils (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 10

• Nom and for. The quantity of awesome UnNews he's been writing in the last few months is just mind boggling. Hilarious bloke! Mattsnow 03:50, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:20, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
• He's pretty good -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:30, June 7, 2012 (UTC)
• For.--Funnybony  11:51, Jun 9
• For. Over 240 UnNews and over 280 overall. Long-time unsung hero of Uncyclopedia. -RAHB 09:41, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
• For Big newslap excellence. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:18, June 11, 2012 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:23, 11 June 2012
• Absolutely. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:54, June 15, 2012 (UTC)
• Great News! Yay Weebils, so well deserved it's crazy he hasn't won this yet. Aleister 16:00 27-6-'12
• For. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:11, June 28, 2012 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Mr-ex777 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 14

• Nom + Strong for This guy has been here for over a year non stop. I don't care if he occasionally floods the fuck out of the IRC channel or constantly talks about things that I don't give a fuck about. This guy is the victim of people constantly only remembering the negatives and never ever remembering the good he does. He helps out with wiki maintenance and gets no credit for it, he's easy going, is funny when he wants be, doesn't give a fuck what others think and last of all he's 16 years old. I mean he's younger than I am, and I won this somehow, so yeah plenty of positive things that he never gets recognition for so vote for him or else! ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:18, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
• For. --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 07:49, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
• Against. Nah, just kidding. For.---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 08:02, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
• For. He's the bee's knees. Or, as they say in his country, "蜜蜂的膝蓋". -RAHB 08:15, June 1, 2012 (UTC)
• He's a lovable goofball who does things. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jun 3 '12 5:41 (UTC)
• I like his enthusiasm. Mattsnow 03:48, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
• I want to eat his left over morning toast. --ShabiDOO 17:38, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
• Per above. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:41, 5 June 2012
• Sure, why not? He's done much on this site. --Alpha Quintesson (talk) 05:40, June 9, 2012 (UTC
• For.--Funnybony  09:55, Jun 11
• And then there were eleven. Mr-ex777 is one of the backbones of the site (there are some more bones in there, Funnybony is one). A great user. Aleister 16:03 27-6-'12
• For. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:13, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
• Would vote four times if I could. But not five. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:25, June 28, 2012 (UTC)
• For. He is a Pokemon Master! -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:51, June 28, 2012 (UTC)