Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 17

NotM

Official nominations for January 2014

Macboswell

Score: 5

1. For. A user with great potential. He wrote a nice article and has a couple more in his user space. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:41, January 17, 2014 (UTC)

   Comment. Come on people, we've all acknowledged how much of a great noob this guy is. Could you show some more appreciation for what he's done by voting here? --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:26, February 15, 2014 (UTC)

2. For. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:00, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
3. For. Yes! Anton (talk) 10:32, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
4. For. Two articles already featured, more to come! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:51, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
5. He has features, good enough for me. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:18, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

Official nominations for February 2014

KickAssAndGiggle

Score: 5

1. For. Written some brilliant articles and contributed a lot on UN:VFD . He's going to go far. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:11, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
2. Aye. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:18, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
3. For. Where is my vote gone? Anton (talk) 10:20, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

   P.S. Do you think we can have two nominations separately: one for January and one for February? Anton (talk) 10:20, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

   I think we can have one NotM in January and one NotM in February, no? Anton (talk) 16:40, February 19, 2014 (UTC)

4. For. Definite runner for this award. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:20, February 23, 2014 (UTC)
5. For. a deserved winner Banzaikitten (talk) 17:24, February 25, 2014 (UTC)

Banzaikitten

Score: 3

1. He started editing Uncyclopedia at the end of January and already helped us at VFD and wrote a good UnNews article! I am sure both of the nominees deserve the award! Anton (talk) 16:39, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
2. Really good contributions! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 20:22, 22 February, 2014 (UTC)
3. For ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:18, February 23, 2014 (UTC)

#Against- really not sure about this guy - Banzaikitten (talk) 17:01, February 25, 2014 (UTC)

1. Please be aware, votes against a user (even yourself) on award pages are not usually accepted on this wiki. If you feel this user does not deserve the award it is usually accepted just to abstain. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:37, February 25, 2014 (UTC)

   As ScottPat says, no votes are verboten but you can withdraw which is different .--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:15, February 25, 2014 (UTC)

   Thank you for the cold robotic lectures I have come to expect. Banzaikitten (talk) 23:16, February 25, 2014 (UTC)

Official nominations for March 2014

Alpalwriter (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5

1. Nom + For Has already started with a very promising article that continues to improve to what it's capable of being. This guy for sure. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:48, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
2. Certainly. Anton (talk) 14:00, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
3. Presuming I can vote for myself. Alpalwriter (talk) 16:12, March 23, 2014 (UTC)
4. For.--Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 17:35, March 23, 2014 (UTC)
5. For. Written a lot. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:42, March 23, 2014 (UTC)

Nick123 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5

1. For. Started editing on the first of March and now is already a poopsmith! If this doesn't mean that he is and will be a great user, I don't know what this could possibly mean. Anton (talk) 08:07, March 18, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:48, March 20, 2014 (UTC)
3. For. Because I can apparently vote for myself, and I won't just ignore that. Hey, everything is fair in love and war! Bro. Nicholas☭ 15:00, March 23, 2014 (UTC)
4. For. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:32, March 23, 2014 (UTC)
5. For. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 17:35, March 23, 2014 (UTC)

Official nominations for April-May 2014

RAF Packington (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

1. For. A very nice writer and a promising user, who joined us last month, but has already earned a feature by writing about himself! Anton (talk) 19:24, April 19, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. Splendid fellow. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 06:30, April 20, 2014 (UTC)
3. For. One hit so far. Hope there are more to come. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:12, April 20, 2014 (UTC)
4. Nobody does it better, or worse. Good to know the gent. Aleister 18:52 20-4-14

Official nominations for June 2014

TheWikiMan026 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

1. Nom + For Eager and helpful, he should get this. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:43, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. Plenty of enthusiasm and inspiration, and this is the most important part! Anton (talk) 13:26, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
3. For. Of course! Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 11:47, June 30, 2014 (UTC)
4. Against. While he has come a long way and is certainly enthusiastic in snippets, I get annoyed when he goes on about writing an article and getting others to help, but then puts in very little work himself. For instance he signed up for Happy Monkey but didn't write his article. Of course there are important jobs on this site other than article-writing, in which he has displayed a commendable keenness.--|(get dtf) 23:18, July 3, 2014 (UTC)

Official nominations for August 2014

ConCass2 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

1. For. ConCass is the author of seven mainspace articles, seven rewrites, a very helpful and friendly Uncyclopedia and he still hasn't got this award?! I suggest we repair this mistake by giving him another one as well! Anton (talk) 23:22, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. Yeah, he seems cool. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 18:35 8 September 2014
3. For. Deserves the recognition! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:12, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Official nomination for October 2014

Moonhead42 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

1. N+F Has written stuff, already has 1 feature to his/her name. Basically everything good a noob can possibly do. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:23, September 11, 2014 (UTC)
2. Comment. Ok this isn't a vote, but can somebody tell me why there are nominations open for three different months at once? Don't they need to be whacked upside the head with a bucket of ice water, or something? It kind of confuses me as to where I'm allowed to vote on what. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:01 11 September 2014
3. For.. Different months, different Noobs. So we can all vote for our choice. Also, we have been slack here as regards this page. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:14, September 11, 2014 (UTC)

Official nomination for November 2014

Ye Blacke Adder (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6

1. Nom and for In a very Vini, vidi, vici spirit, Ye Blacke Adder joined us for the PLS, won it with his Muslim Sisterhood and now is even patrolling the site! He definitely deserves this award! Anton (talk) 13:35, November 9, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. I would be hard-pressed to decide between these two, but nominator has found a loophole in the rules to allow multiple votes and even nominations. Thank God for copypaste. So this may be settled either through an unsatisfying "co-award" or delightful treachery. Spıke Ѧ 00:01 22-Nov-14

   Why are co-awards unsatisfying? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:08 22 November 2014

   You kidding? Uncyclopedian gets a noobie award with a big asterisk dripping red fluid to advise the reader that, although we like this guy, we are decidedly pulling our punches. We would date him but not give him more than a peck on the cheek. The only saving grace is that he is free not to disclose that he didn't win it outright. Spıke Ѧ 00:25 22-Nov-14

3. For. Blacke Adder likes writing but also checks on other pages where there's possible mischief! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:09, November 22, 2014 (UTC)
4. For. Anton, I don't mean to be pedantic, but isn't {{VoteNOTM}} supposed to be on my userpage? Ye Blacke Adder (talk) 12:39, November 22, 2014 (UTC)

   What a lack of gratitude! No, seriously, I don't know how I could forget it. Anton (talk) 13:19, November 22, 2014 (UTC)

   Thank you. Hopefully this is sufficient as reimbursement. Ye Blacke Adder (talk) 14:07, November 22, 2014 (UTC)

   For. Best of all, he is pedantic! Spıke Ѧ 14:08 22-Nov-14

   Hey, you voted twice. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 21:11 22 November 2014

5. For One of the few editors who helps to fill up QVFD. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 21:11 22 November 2014
6. For. Definitely. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:03, November 23, 2014 (UTC)

Begege (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

1. Nom and for Begege writes prominent new articles, but also does all sorts of article-related things, such as illustrationing, adding to, taking from, copy-editing, cut-editing and paste-editing them! His press secretary even told the UnSignpost editors his ambition was to complete the Star Trek saga on Uncyclopedia and he's moving fast towards this goal. Cheers, Begege! Anton (talk) 23:44, November 21, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. I would be hard-pressed to decide between these two, but nominator has found a loophole in the rules to allow multiple votes and even nominations. Thank God for copypaste. So this may be settled either through an unsatisfying "co-award" or delightful treachery. Spıke Ѧ 00:01 22-Nov-14

WotM

Official Nominations for March (- April) 2014

Phrank Psinatra (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6

1. For. Pfunny pwriter! His articles are also worth reading! With a pfeatured pseudo-pscientific particle on ptelevision, phe pis pa p-perfectly pegitimate pendidate! P-please, excuse me, Pie am pstuttering from phonour! Anton (talk) 19:49, March 10, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. I have my internet service denied all week, and the minute I come back online, this! Seriously, thanks for nominating me, Anton199. Phrank Psinatra (talk) 01:18, March 21, 2014 (UTC)
3. For. Splendid fellow. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 18:12, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
4. For. Phrankly yes. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:23, April 6, 2014 (UTC)
5. For. He was best writer of the month as soon as he came up with his user name. Aleister 11:39 6-4-14
6. Smegma. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)

Official Nominations for April-July 2014

Vegetationlife (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

1. For. For great writing and sticking with us, largely unrecognised, since 2007! Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:25, April 18, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. Exactly! I liked the Tenerife article very much! Anton (talk) 18:08, April 19, 2014 (UTC)

Anton199 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6.25

1. Anton hasn't won this yet? There is no God. (just goddesses). Aleister 18:40 18-4-14
2. For. And there was me thinking he had! Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:44, April 18, 2014 (UTC)
3. My vote counts as one and a quarter. --ShabiDOO 14:04, April 19, 2014 (UTC)
4. What a guy! --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 16:48, April 19, 2014 (UTC)
5. For. Now get writing that Bioshock article!    SIR  MAC  BOSWELL     [†]  13:06, April 25, 2014 (UTC)
6. For. Excellent writer - from Russia no less! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:51, June 25, 2014 (UTC)

Official nominations for October(-November) 2014

Captain gull (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

1. Nom and for The winner of the Poo Lit Surprise and an author of amazing articles, in general! Anton (talk) 14:18, October 29, 2014 (UTC)
2. *Checks to see if I've actually written 5 articles* OK! For. Capt. Gull (talk) 08:33, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
3. For. Stairs was a worthy Poo Lit winner. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:42, November 6, 2014 (UTC)
4. For. Most certainly. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:10, November 8, 2014 (UTC)

Nikau (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

1. Nom and for Nikau writes brilliantly and is extremely productive! Also, the runner-up in the Poo Lit Surprise! Anton (talk) 14:18, October 29, 2014 (UTC)

UotM

Official Nominations for February-March 2014

Anton199

Score: 4

1. About time he deserves it. He helped Puppy re-format UnSignpost and always helps new users. Great guy! Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:18, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. Both absolutely deserve it. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 09:19, March 15, 2014 (UTC)
3. Neither Anton or ScottPat have this award yet? A travesty of justice. I'm signing on Anton's only because he has two votes and needs three's a crowd, but of course both should get it as soon as possible, and if they don't tie then why not tie-them up anyway. Aleister 11:43 6-4-14

p.s. although actually ScottPat won already and now we just need to list Anton as April's winner.

1. Nipples. --ShabiDOO 12:01, April 6, 2014 (UTC)

ScottPat

Score: 6

1. Anton199 and ScottPot should have by all rights both won this.. Months ago. So lets work together and make it a beautiful tie so they can both win! Do it do it do it. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:22, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
2. The man who revived and led (and still leads) the UnSignpost, Pee Reviews, checks VFD and VFH, helps new users, writes articles, interviews and makes pictures! And this is not all! Anton (talk) 10:37, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
3. For. Both absolutely deserve it. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 09:19, March 15, 2014 (UTC)
4. For. Very helpful, took up the UnSignpost and makes a very pretty lady. Both absolutely deserve this, whoever loses this month will surely win next month. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 18:10, March 29, 2014 (UTC)
5. For. Yes. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:24, April 6, 2014 (UTC)
6. Choda. --ShabiDOO 12:00, April 6, 2014 (UTC)

Official Nominations for April (+May +June, the long hot summer of our discontent) 2014

Anton199 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 8

1. Nom and for. What happened to all that talk last month about him definitely getting it this month? WHY HASN'T HE GOT THIS YET? WHY??? --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 07:35, April 18, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. Yes he needs it. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:59, April 18, 2014 (UTC)
3. For. I have money riding on this game. Yay Anton! Aleister 18:42 18-4-14
4. FOR ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:34, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
5. I bet all of you a "get out of a ban free card" that Anton wins it this month! --ShabiDOO 03:08, June 10, 2014 (UTC)
6. For. Here almost every day, doing everything from graciously greeting the newbies to making templates work correctly. Spıke Ѧ 03:40 10-Jun-14
7. For. duuh --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 11:56, June 10, 2014 (UTC)
8. For. From Russia with Edits..--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:58, June 10, 2014 (UTC)
9. Comment: Why are we still doing this at two or three month intervals? It's Uncy of the Month, Not Uncy of the Season. Makes the site look shoddy. Anton, you won this! Long overdue, both in the winning and in the presenting. Aleister 16:04 10-6-14

Official nominations for August 2014

ConCass2 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

1. For. Since April 2014, when he joined Uncyclopedia, ConCass has achieved a great amount of things (see his userpage for details)! He does a very good job at VFD, writes, rewrites and cleans articles up! Plus, he has the right attitude (a positive one)! What else is needed to become Uncyclopedia of the Month? Anton (talk) 23:28, August 24, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:14, January 30, 2015 (UTC)

WOTY

Nominations for 2014

SPIKE

Score: 4

1. Nom and For Spike's more than just a writer for this site, he does everything. However, he is still at heart a writer, and a brilliant one too, so it's about time he has this prize. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:28, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. I thought Spike had got this already..but he hasn't! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:16, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
3. For. Some writers care for quality, others for quantity, but Spike manages to write tons of brilliant articles in very limited time periods, and does this as a routine. That's why I think this award will only be a due recognition of his outstanding contributions! Anton (talk) 16:55, January 1, 2015 (UTC)
4. For. I shall put my finger on the scale to cancel out Vavaunni's rage-quit vote and give us another of our beloved ties. Spıke Ѧ 03:27 1-Feb-15

• I thought I had voted on this already. Oh well. Consider this an Abstain. so we can keep the beloved tie. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 04:45, February 1, 2015 (UTC)

Romartus

Score: 5

1. Nom and For Romartus not only is the master of writing Epic articles (in both sense of the word "epic") but also touches up countless articles, improving this site's writing quality daily. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:28, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. The master of Ancient history, but not only, Romartus is a great writer, who simply has to win this. This year - together with Spike, perhaps? They both contribute amazing material, albeit in a different fashion. Anton (talk) 16:58, January 1, 2015 (UTC)
3. For.not around much but when I am one of these two is always maintaining quality and they both deserve it. So I'm evening the score in the hope they'll share like good children.--Sog1970 (talk) 16:27, January 6, 2015 (UTC)
4. For. --Vavaunni (talk) 14:59, January 9, 2015 (UTC)
5. For Probably should have/would have/could have won this every year for the last half a decade. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:29, February 4, 2015 (UTC)

UOTY

Nominations for 2014

Anton199

Score: 5

1. For. Anton has persevered and thrown himself into organising almost everything. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:39, December 29, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:28, February 1, 2015 (UTC)
3. Hear hear. Spıke Ѧ 02:31 1-Feb-15
4. Sure. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:28, February 4, 2015 (UTC)
5. For. Without a doubt. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:04, February 4, 2015 (UTC)