Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 9

July 2009

Writer of the Month

Sog1970 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 14 Soggy Scribes

• Nom&for. Sog has been producing some really great articles. It's only his second month of proper activity and his user page is already overflowing with listings of other feature worthy projects. --^Dame 10:32, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• Very For. Soggy was 'too old' to be a noob last month but fully deserves WotM nomination for July for having featured work and general consistency and invention. And he doesn't whine about it either (not yet at least) ! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 11:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• 4chanSkin I absolutely loved British Moon-landing. --Sir Sunbeam no u F@H KUN 12:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Saberwolf116 15:45, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• Strong For. Where did this guy come from? We need some more from whereveritwas. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:01, 1 Jul
• Oh Absolutley    Orian57    Talk   17:17 1 July 2009
• I'd be daft not to--Sog1970 11:49, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• Definitely. --iseditor.user ^Comments/_Criticism 12:20, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:00, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Go Sog! definitely deserve this, articles all rock hard... Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 08:47, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. --Docile hippopotamus 03:30, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• For - loved Mrs God's blog--I'mthedaddy 12:23, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• Awesomness incarnate. Sog1970 is one of the few writers whose works actually make me go loling. However, this is only a Half For as the other half goes to Todd Loins Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 10:17 July 16 '09
  • Nope, can't do that. No no no. No tresspassing. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
    • Damn. Ok, I vote for sog Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 05:04 July 17 '09
• For. Rapidly becoming one of my favourite writers. --UU - natter 14:25, Jul 30

GlobalTourniquet (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 14 of Thomas Pynchon's testicles

1. Nom and for. I have no idea how this guy hasn't gotten this award yet. In addition to his six features, he also maintains the horoscopes, which frequently make me laugh most uproariously. In conclusion, - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 22:32, Jul 1
2. For Apparently he left, but now he's back and writing good articles. Staircase CUN^t 22:33, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Normally, I choose to wait a while into the month to vote for WotM, but GT is such a good writer, I will vote early this month. I am proud to be Mr. Pynchon's second testicle (FU STAIRCASE! EDIT CONFLICT! My claim to be the second testicle stands.). As Led said, - Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 22:37, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
4. For. Long overdue, if you ask me. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:54, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
5. For. I've had better months here, but is this one of those Scorsese-Departed-type deals? --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 03:50, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
6. Yeah. I thoroughly enjoyed Plink. pillow talk 03:55, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
7. Horoscopes At first I was going to wait, because the two contenders, Sog and GT, have nearly the same number of features. Then I saw he was the writer of the horoscopes. Hey, we haven't had a nailbiter like this month's WotM in a while!   Le Cejak • <3:59 Jul 03, 2009>
8. Plink. Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! ~12:10/3/July
9. For -RAHB 04:09, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
10. Excellent writer. Loved every one of his features. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:21, Jul 6
11. For. One of the plink best writers we plonk have.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 14:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
12. Plink MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
13. Emphatic For.! --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:17, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
14. For. Because I want both GlobalTourniquet and Sog to win this. They are both magnificent writers. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Todd Lyons (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4

• Once again, spiritual for. I am genuinely shocked he has not won this yet. Saberwolf116 17:28, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Well, he did... 41 months ago. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
    • Yes Lyons has it. Check the previous winners. Staircase CUN^t 17:44, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
      • Ok, i'm shocked he hasn't won it in 2 years. Saberwolf116 22:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• for. it's like moses suddenly showed up in downtown cairo and started turning water into mountain dew...or something. also, official sig! Sir Gerrycheevers GUN NotM PotM UotM RotM WotM VFH VFP FP FIC NS
• For another royal asskicking this month. ^_^ I'm having a lovely vacation by the way. How's things? I miss you. You never write; never call. 'Cept Orian, he's a darling. Cheers, etc. --T. (talk) 16:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Half For.' I must vote for sog, he's awesomely awsome, but I just cant go with another "spriritual vote for toddy" this month. So, I'm dividing my vote into two, one half for each Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 10:13 July 16 '09
  • As above. Full votes or nothing. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:28, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. A vile specimen of humanity with rabies. Wrote some good things that one time though.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:03, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Todd has always made my articles funnier, and sometimes added funny when there was none!-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 17:13, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• For; He resembles this remark. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:10, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

MadMax (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +0

• Nominate He's like a combination of all of the other people nominated, but Australian. Also, he has experience with this title. And UotY. He's the most deserving to win this award again. Even more than me and Socky combined. Alas, I've already cast my vote this month. Plus, I intend to vote for TDM next month. But MadMax is amazing. All of you need to go and tell MadMax he's awesome. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Mahm00shA (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2

• YEZ nom + 4 Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! ~09:50/1/July
• I hate Zheliel I was supposed to nom! Don Puttano cHeDDs 16:47,1July,2009

  <smug>I know... hehehe...</smug> Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! ~12:11/3/July

  I'm really sorry Mahm00shA, but with the Der Unwehr thing, Guildy really does deserve it this month. Don Puttano cHeDDs 15:55,7July,2009

• FOR!--Fallopian 04:29, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Zana Dark (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9

• This past month I have been nothing but impressed with Zana's contributions lately. She's been helping out n00bs all over the place, made a whole lot of quality audios, has made many of the portals turn out as well as they have, and has been a very cool lady. I fully support Ms. Dark for Uncyclopedian of the Month, as I believe she has earned it with her recent contributions. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:12, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. per above, mainly the portal cleanup. --Mn-z 16:46, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Zana has put away the stray socks and underpants (i.e. nasty users) and cleaned up the portals so that they GLEAM in the sunlight. Zana is also an interesting writer as well and hope she can contribute more in that department. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:06, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. I've been thinking being nommed at UotM someday. —Flutter Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 16:26, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• 4 - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 03:54, Jul 10
  • Changed my mind. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 19:38, Jul 29
• For. --Docile hippopotamus 03:31, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. -Yes, she deserves it.  TALK  FRESH MEAT  ♥ talk to me 15:16 16 July 2009
• Fwoar As per all that stuff up there. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 15:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. As tempting as the notorious Guildy self-for always is, I have to throw my support to Zana this month. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 06:53, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Guildy I am pretty sure as a person with a kazillion features and awards you won't be offended :P even you agree :P Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 15:15, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Optimuschris (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +15 less notable transformers

• Nomination and For. He's a real good one we got here. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
• I love ya opty Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 17:47 July 8 '09
• woo yea cul guy -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 03:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• for. Sir Gerrycheevers GUN NotM PotM UotM RotM WotM VFH VFP FP FIC NS
• Autobots, role out! Also, to make this really impressive and to encourage everyone to vote for Opti's penis I'll use my formal signature. Now you all know that my penis is larger than his. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 08:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
• For; mainly because Optimuschris has never sexually harassed me. And no, this is not an invitation for sexual harassment. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

  Dammit. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:04, 16 Jul

• For Cause I nominated him at least once before. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 14:12, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
• For because he's an ass. (jk) -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!)
• For. - One vanity bitch whore sig, commin' at ya!--Le Chevalier Sycamore GUN WoTM UoTM AoTM² RotM MAFE VFH PLS Pee N C P ScouseWhore Snitch Snitch 2 Cat Shitmuncher (talk) 16:56, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
• For - cos he's Opty C. Those other people can suck it. -- mysterious Ape (reduce) (Riot Porn) 13:09, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. I need no reason. NONE! Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 17:55, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Sorry zana, but I gotta jump on the optyC bandwagon. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 19:38, Jul 29
• For. Zana and Guildy are both worthy candidates but I gotta go for Mr Chris. Mostly because I really enjoyed the new Transformers movie. But also cause he's a cool guy. And also cause I'm a sucker for bandwagons. --^Dame 12:28, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
• Spiritual For. Per everything that Eric said. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 13:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Because he's, like good at stuff, and stuff. And he's been doing other good stuff for some time as well. In conclusion: stuff. Also, time to dig out my vaguely more official sig. SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 14:05, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Because that OptyC dude is a very nice dude, though the other nominees are also very nice persons. I guess this guy stands out for some probably very good but otherwise unspecified reason. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:23, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Guildensternenstein (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9 sternly guilded steins

• Nom and for Like last month, an approach at rewriting bad articles has never been so organized and productive. 22 rewrites, 7 features, and there's no stopping it. I give my vote to Guildy for making the Der Unwher. Staircase CUN^t 04:50, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. As per last month. IronLung 07:53, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• Spiritual Bless I would vote for you, but I already voted. Next month maybe. You earned this with the Der Unwehr. Don Puttano cHeDDs 15:57,7July,2009
• For. Obviously. -- Style  Guide 06:47, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 09:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain. My first UoTM Abstain! Well, I'd vote but I love competition. Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! It's 11 July-03:07 ...with savings!
• For.. Out of all these candidates, I feel Guildy has done the most. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:49, Jul 16
• For.. D&D article taken just by itself was amazing.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 17:15, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
• Because he voted for me... and D&D:IRL has me ROFLMAO.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:14, 25 July 2009
• For. For being such a cool guy and for writing so many articles, oh and for listening to me.--ChiefjusticeDS 12:51, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Always. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 16:37, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

THEDUDEMAN (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1 dude men

• Nomination and I wish I could vote For but I already voted for Optimus and I like him too but... there's a time when you nominate someone for something, and you're like "hey, has this guy won yet?" Sometimes you realize they have, so you do it with reluctance. However, this guy hasn't won yet. So I am nominating this guy with extreme prejudice. He's one of the most helpful non-admins we've got on the site at the moment, has been doing shittons of work for two years, and has miraculously not won this award yet. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• I agree with TKF I already cast my vote this month, but Sir Dudeington has deserved this for a long time. Now that he's back, he deserves it again. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:00, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Have my babies! -

  Kingkitty ~Fuck you Brett~ ~Die in a fire Favre~

• What The Killer Woody said. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 22:31, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
  • You only get one vote, dude. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:56, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
    • And, just like Woody said, he's voting for the other guy. Who changed the score? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:04, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
      • After looking through the page history, it was Dexter, apparently. The bastard. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
        • What? I have no idea what you're talking about. So anyway, a Nazi and a Jew walk into a bar... MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:16, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

LittlePinkSock (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4

• Nom + Bless Per my spiritual for last month. Don Puttano cHeDDs 16:51,1July,2009
• For.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 18:30, 1 July 2009 (UTC) Deciding to roll with the changes, baby! Got to got to got to keep on rollin'!--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 18:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Like UU said last month, she's kept her head down and has written a very nice article. Deserves this, IMO. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 01:15, Jul 2
• Something happened to my sig!- By User:Flutter 21:39, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

  Good to know? Is this a for or what? If it's just a comment then why is it here? Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:03,2July,2009

  But then why is this comment here? Oh, yea I remember... Well looking at the contributions... MrN  Fork you! 03:17, Jul 4

  Shut your mouths, both of you. This is voting, not repling. (or commenting) —Flutter Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 23:35, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

*For per the bribe. Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! ~12:13/3/July

• For I smell fish. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 18:08, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain I'd love to vote for, but my vanity stops me. Pup 23:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:48, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2

• Nom, not for. He deserves a vote, being on Uncyc for only 3 days yet contributing so much. Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! ~14:49/4/July
• For Cause I'm stupid. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• For; Because Dexter111344 is stupid. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 07:42, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
• Five Because Zombiebaron thinks Dexter is stupid. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:19, 29 Jul

PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +20

• Yeah. He's qualified, I guess. Erm, spiritual for. Whatever that means. Mr Zhe-mel-talki-signe-singaporel-bling ^Brute! ~03:18/6 of July

  Spiritual for means a fake for, like you would vote for him if you hadn't already voted. Don Puttano cHeDDs 16:02,6July,2009

• I normally hate NotM, but I really like this guy. Principles be damned, I say for! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• Against Just don't don't like him. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 04:29, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• For You got my vote, but what is Barista'ing?!? Never really got the point. Hummmm.....—Flutter Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 05:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• For I think he has a cute bottom. Teeheehee. your dogma is humping my ego - POTR
• For. POTR is witty. --Docile hippopotamus 06:39, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• For He asked me. I can't say no, baby! Padddy5 11:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• For Staircase CUN^t 16:49, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• For Meh, he Pee Reviewed me, so morally obliged to vote For. (GODDAMN, forgot to log on again. Need coffee...) Slackerlord 21:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• For Just for being him.What's with the random usernames these days?--Bad Shroom 22:09, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• For This guy seems alright. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 23:14, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• woa -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 04:03, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
• For He's a very busy puppy. And he basically begged--Sog1970 20:10, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. woof woof woof *static* over and out Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 00:06 July 16 '09
• For. He gave me hope, which is hard to find these days as there are very few dealers around selling it. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM)
• For As loath as I am to interrupt the nothing I'm busy with right now, POTR has really impressed me this month (and reviewed my article FINALLY).--ChiefjusticeDS 19:49, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
• For A great new user. MrN  Fork you! 00:02, Jul 27
• Aaaand another For for good measure. MacMania 02:39, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• FOR. I put my for in capitals. Because I am that special. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 17:52, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. He gave my article a good review and has been in general useful to the site.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 18:55, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Good boy. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:17, 29 Jul
• Lookit that. I still haven't voted. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 21:25, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
• Great n00b. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

August 2009

Writer of the Month

MacMania (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 8

• Nom + For. I haven't heard about this guy until I read John Hodgman and, intrigued, I followed it to his userpage. Turns out he's cranked out a ton of hilarious goodies this past month, including (but not nearly limited to) Sherlock Holmes (now featured), James Watt, Cheerios (also featured, now), UnScripts:Star Wars (2010) (featured now, also), Firefly (on the fast track to already being featured) and UnScripts:Les Misérables, Abrégés. Over ten quality articles in a single month is enough to convince me. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:44, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
• Weak, weak, abstain. It convinced me, but I felt like abstaining. Sorry. zh I hate me new sig 12:51 August 3

Seriously, this is getting out of hand. Either give your vote to someone or don't. This is not VFH. ~ 16:50, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

• For. Why not? Sir MacMania GUN— 19:20, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Changed my mind. Not voting yet. Sir MacMania GUN— 20:30, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
• For I did the PEE reviews on a couple of his articles and I'm very impressed, he has written some really good stuff and he deserves this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ChiefjusticeDS (talk • contribs) 20:49, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
• For My new role-model Dah Dope Boyz' User:DaDopeboy/sig 10:22, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
• For He is putting out a lot of high quality material. Sequence 14:36, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
• For He's very talented and has the most seductive writing style I've ever seen. Ohhhh Mac! *sighs longingly* --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 19:52, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. because he has cute buns Pup t 06:54, 9/08/2009
• For. the sake of Sherlock Holmes, if nothing else. Because he's awesome, if anything else. --Vana 22:44, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
• For.. ~ 10:42, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

The Woodburninator (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom and for. Five features, and a bunch of other great articles. Staircase CUN^t 16:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

• Thank you very much for the nom Steps (oh it's an honor just to get mentioned), but I don't feel like I've earned this yet. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 16:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

• For - you've written some good stuff lately. -- mysterious Ape (reduce) (Riot Porn) 17:24, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Necropaxx (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 20

• Nom & For 9 friggin features. This makes my five look dorky and underwhelming. Vote Necropaxx (It's the second x that makes him cool.) Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 16:48, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. There are 32 writers on Uncyclopedia who have more features than Necropaxx. They have all won WotM. Apparently, the list of WotM winners closely duplicates UN:HS. What a crazy random happenstance. Anyway, the new and improved Antbortion: good. pillow talk 20:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
• Very For.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 21:31, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
• YKWTMM said it best. ~~Sir Fightstar Rocks! CUN 12:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
• for. gotta love Toaster. also, 9 features is about when you hit your stride; look for much more greatness from necro in the near future. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:46, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. --Docile hippopotamus 04:00, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
• Self-For. True story: I looked at my watchlist to see that Woody had added something to my userpage. A WotM nom! No way! No flippin' way! I had to check to make sure. I gasped out loud. No way! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:12, Aug 6

And as to "more greatness", you might want to take a look at the UnMystery I'm currently hacking out. Just don't tell anyone, it's a secret. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:15, Aug 6

I don't know, but since when has self-foring on Of the Month awards no longer become a faux pas? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Since I did it and won UotM. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:07, Aug 15

• WTF?!? You haven't already won, Necro?!?! We'll fix that! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
• Deadly Peace X For per Necropaxx's coolness and greatness and ... and stuff. You know what I mean! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
• For all the cool kids are doing it and I don't have the slightest chance and I can't vote for myself without hurting my conscienceand did I mention I don't have a chance? But seriously, nine features is an amazing feat. He deserves it far more than I. Sir MacMania GUN— 00:37, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. per what everyone else said Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 06:23, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
• For; Necropaxx has been around doing good writing for some time now, and he's even got the chutzpah to vote for himself. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. Necropaxx for being around and working here even without computer access which is clever. I also won't mark him down for visiting a creationist center and enjoying it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 08:32, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 23:29, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. per above. --Mn-z 18:16, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:37, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
• Oh shit! He hasn't won this yet?! very for Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 22:41 August 12 '09
• Yup--Sog1970 21:41, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. I've been a fan of Necropaxx since I reviewed Toaster back in the day. Knows what he's doing. --UU - natter 08:30, Aug 30
• For. MrN  Fork you! 08:35, Aug 30

Uncyclopedian of the Month

SunnyChow (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nomination; I've already voted this month, and I know that this month's vote will probably be split over a number of very deserving candidates, but I feel that SunnyChow deserves this award too, and so I'm nominating him here so that he might get recognition from us, his peers, and maybe this award in the future. Because, seriously, I had never heard of this guy until a few days ago when he was nominated for PotM. And I was like "Okay, he deserves that". And then I went and looked at his contributions. Ever heard of Text Pong? I hadn't. Ever heard of Slot Fighter? My Untune Hero? Uncyclo-tan? This guy doesn't even speak English as his first language (or very well, as he admits himself), and he's doing things that I never imagined possible. So, take a look, and give this man some respect. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:19, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
• For Whatever this guy is doing, we need more of it. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 00:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)

The Woodburninator (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1 people who've got wood.

• Omnomnom I haven't decided who I'm gonna vote for yet, but Woody should have won this by now. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:09, 5 Aug
• Aye. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:03, Aug 6
• Props. I've been bragging to my coworkers about how much I like this kid. Maybe in a few months. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

THEDUDEMAN (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +12

• Nomination, but can't decide on voting quite yet. TDM has a lengthy history of work and maintenance, to the point of becoming an asset or a national treasure. It's not only a surprise but also a shame that he hasn't won this yet. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
• For Has done quite a lot. MadMax can win it (for the second time; third if you count the fact he also won UotY.) next in two months, but he definitely deserves that nomination. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:56, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
• This guy. -- mysterious Ape (reduce) (Riot Porn) 14:40, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
• for. with a nod to his useful robot buddy, THEDUDEBOT. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:48, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
• Manbotdudefor Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:58, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
• Oh for! (Bonner) (Talk) Aug 5, 18:19
• Foar. As per TKF. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 17:35, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. Per TKF, his history of maintenance merited this award long ago. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 06:57, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. --Docile hippopotamus 01:38, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. Sorry don't get it done, Dude. Doing shitloads of helpful stuff throughout your time on Uncyc does. --UU - natter 08:37, Aug 30
• For~ 10:43, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
• For It is always a good sign when you have never talked to a user but have seen their work and their contributions everywhere, including on your talk page. TDM has gone far beyond myself in terms of contributing to the upkeep of Uncyclopedia, and as such is more deserving of this award than I. --ChiefjusticeDS 20:25, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
• He's the dude, man. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

MadMax (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3

• Nomination. MadMax is literally mad. People have argued that he ought to have won this award twice, despite not being active in the months it was discussed, but now he is active again, and in the short weeks he's been back, he's managed to surpass everyone else in efficacy by at least 1000% combined. I haven't seen comebacks like this since Patrick Ewing's. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:51, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
• For keeping up the competition. zh I hate me new sig 12:35 August 3
• Vote Yes. I'm a n00b here but MadMax still offered to protect the PETA article I rewrote and has helped me a lot! Miley Spears 01:55, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
• strongest possible moral support. of all the people who have won awards twice, none of them deserved it more than MadMax winning another UotM. this guy is uncyclopedia. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
• Huge fucking props. But if I'm not mistaken, this guy's already also won Uncyclopedian of the Year, no? Led said to me giving him UotM after that is actually kinda insulting and I tend to agree. Nevertheless MadMAx is a machine. He doesn't feel remorse or pity, and he absolutely will not stop ever, until you are dead. Or am I getting my machines mixed up again? -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:55, 4 Aug

  Yes, he has also won UotY. But come on, he's MadMax! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:52, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

  Aye, but wouldn't it be like giving someone who's won a Nobel Prize first place at the science fair? -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:59, 4 Aug

  Nay, it's like giving Bill Gates $20 for gas. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:16, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

• For; this month is close, but MadMax wins out in my mind because he's basically the Lone Ranger of Uncyclopedia. Thank you masked man! -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:36, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Romartus (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nomination - For all the voting. -- -- mysterious Ape (reduce) (Riot Porn) 01:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

  I'm more appreciative of the articles he writes. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:58, 2 August 2009 (UTC)

• For. A really nice and useful guy Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 00:04 August 2 '09

ChiefjusticeDS (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +7

• Nomination but still undecided. Seems to be all over the place. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 15:40, Aug 1
• For (being so welcoming to me and being a generally thoroughly nice chap). I'm sure his actual contributions have been good too, I know he's been a devoted reviewer and all. --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 21:40, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
• Stronger For. The reason why this is stronger is because I still strongly support MadMax and TDM and Bonner. However, while I both love and appreciate those two, I very rarely say about a user that "X has literally kept Y going for weeks." Well, Chiefjustice has literally kept Pee Review going for weeks, and that is both a huge responsibility and an accomplishment. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. He definitely has been keeping the Pee Review system afloat from what I can see looking back into the archives, plus is a generally helpful guy. Sequence 12:46, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. I've been trying to fix the mess that was Lost in Space and his quick-posted and detailed Pee Review helped more than Dr. Smith in a laser gun battle. Binky The WonderSkull 22:05, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. Madmax has won this already, and I'm not overly familiar with the work of the other guy, but ChiefJustice has given me several excellent Pee Reviews, all of which have been quite helpful, so yeah. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 07:42, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. Seems to be everywhere and that is a good reason to vote in favour.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 16:35, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. Good luck Chief and thanks for the useful reviews! Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 09:56, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Guildensternenstein (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom and for. Per my long-standing policy of voting for Guildy for this award. IronLung 02:57, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
• For Per IronLung and my long-standing policy of voting for Guildy for any award. Staircase CUN^t 04:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
• Self-For Per my long-standing policy of voting for myself for any award. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:16, 5 August 2009 (UTC) Eh, fuck it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 07:40, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
• Against No. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 20:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Um, not really sure why the notion is so objectionable, but alright. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 02:01, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Zana Dark (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +0

• Nom + For She came so close last month, she deserves this at least this month. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 08:37, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Considering the scores and the end of the month drawing near I might as well make my vote count Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 09:54, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +0

• Nom because... er, zh I hate me new sig 12:35 August 3

  He can't win this, he's just a n00b. -- mysterious Ape (reduce) (Riot Porn) 14:41, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Simsilikesims (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom This guy does good work an' stuff. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 13:54, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Girl. ~ 07:39, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

• For This guy does good work an' stuff. -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 04:49, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Bonner (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom His edits speak for themselves. Also, love the name. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:36, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
• For, obviously. --User:Jack Phoenix/sig 17:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
• He still hasn't won this? Really? Damn. Strong for. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 17:32, Aug 5
• Ah shit. This guy's back again? Well, that really complicates things again... I don't want to double-cross Chiefjustice with my stunning endorsement up there, but to everyone else: if you don't vote for Chiefjustice, you should probably vote for Bonner. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:01, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
• Self for - I guess, I don't think i've ever been up for any sort of award, so err...Cheers. A bit out of the blue though :) (Bonner) (Talk) Aug 5, 18:18
  • Can't vote twice. Decide between yourself and The Dude, please. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:21, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
    • Oh yeah, shit. I forget things...A lot. Sorry 'bout that. (Bonner) (Talk) Aug 5, 18:22

Hyperbole (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• nomination by uncyclopedia clause 13.b.wtf, which states: "how the bloody fuck does <user> not have <award> yet?" in this case, how the bloody fuck has hyperbole never won UotM? this guy averages 1.7 features per month. that means every two weeks since he showed up, his work is on the front page for a day. he's constantly around on VFD, and he also does useful stuff that never gets noticed, hence the existence of clause 13.b.wtf. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 23:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. per above. --Mn-z 05:47, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. He probably needs nominating on whore of the month also if that has not been done already... Some very creative work there. The whoring I mean. Though HowTo:Whore your article on VFD was better. MrN  Fork you! 05:51, Aug 11
  • It appears Whore of Month is closed. Btw, I can't believe Yettie never won that. --Mn-z 06:12, 11 August 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. If I hadn't already voted for another excellent Unc, I would have voted for Hyperbole. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 06:43, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
• You'll win it next month, trust me. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:47, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

Siddhartha-Wolf (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: Ineligible

Ineligible nomination moved to the talk page for cosmetic reasons. POTR

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• Nom (but not a for...) Actually, looking at the ruling on time, I think I've found an alternate nominee. Pup t 08:41, 3/08/2009

Wait, this guy has been here for over a year, no fair :( --El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 12:25, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

• For third time in a row being nommed. He shall finally win!. zh I hate me new sig 12:32 August 3
• For the lulz. Also, he has won it before Zheliel. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:56, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

  I think you mean before I was born. Or something. We should hold our NotY soon. zh I hate me new sig 10:11 August 6

• token against. you'd think it would amuse me that this is approximately the 8th generation of Rcmurphy nommers, and even the 4th generation had no idea who he was. you'd be mistaken. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:51, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

That suggests that I have to know who he is in order to vote for him. That's almost as bad as having to read an article prior to VFH. Pup t 10:28, 6/08/2009

• For. He's the only one on this list that I have heard of. -OptyC Sucks! CUN16:58, 4 Aug
• EPIC PHOR! as per knowing who he is and always voting for him. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 17:28, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
• For; one of these days, Rcmurphy, straight to the moon! -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:55, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
• Strong For. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:56, 5 August 2009 (UTC)

Against. per dormant 1 year old Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 06:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

No comment Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 06:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

I think you mean {{Comment}}. And rc deserves to win. Though I've never seen him edit before. Or her. zh I hate me new sig 10:13 August 6

Then I guess I'll Abstain. and vote for him the end of the month if no one else comes along :P Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 11:21, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

• WTF? -- This person first posted here 05:26, 5 July 2007. But you accept him/her/it and reject Miley Spears? Miley is only disqualified because she/he/it posted for one day, then came back a month and half later and started posting regularly two weeks ago. So she's really only been active for two weeks and Rcmurphy has been here over two years? WTF????? Binky The WonderSkull 05:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

  I've dumped a response on your user talk page. And why are you named after a horse? Pup t 06:14, 9/08/2009

  You jerk. I've been screwing around and not doing anything useful for four and a half years, not two. Get it right! —rc (t) 03:42, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

  You have a valid point. However, Binky is a n00b who has only been here for three months - give him a break! Pup t 05:37, 15/08/2009

  Actually, I've only been 3 1/2 months, if you don't count the 3 1/2 year gaps. Binky The WonderSkull 06:32, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

• Temporary Against. 'til savior shows up. Hell, it's still 9th and people are voting Rcmorphed already. Defeatist bastards Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 06:27 August 9 '09
• future heavyweight champion of the world right here -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 04:52, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Paul Murphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom. zh I hate me new sig 12:32 August 3

Sequence (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 12

• Nom. Withholding my vote until I see him around more. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 17:38, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
• Half-hearted Strong for. Marginally the better of the three noobs from what I've seen so far. His turd monster thing has some good moments--El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 10:43, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

And he has done some decent peeing too--El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 11:24, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

• For He helped me with the PEE queue and has done some good work otherwise.... also I can't bring myself to vote for RC.--ChiefjusticeDS 17:51, 6 August 2009 (UTC)
• Given that I'm, not voting for RC and I can't vote for Miley, I'll go FOR an Australian who recently started looking for work but is helping with the PEE queue in the meantime - We did it last month! Pup t 07:25, 7/08/2009
• For. In lieu of S-W, I find this guy to be the most useful. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:14, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. per above. --Mn-z 17:51, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• For, because it was my awesome welcome message that made him so good. Right sequence? Please tell them all about how everything good that happens can be attributed to me. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 18:20, Aug 10

Yes, The Led Balloon's individualised pre-rendered welcome was most appreciated :). Sequence 13:10, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

• For. Turd monster has got him my vote as this month's Noob. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 12:15, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. Out of all the candidates he stands out best. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 13:56, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. MrN  Fork you! 08:37, Aug 30
• For. Seems to be doing the right things so far. --UU - natter 08:40, Aug 30
• For. Has been doing a lot of good things. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:59, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Miley Spears (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom Actually really excited by this one. And I think she might make a good writer as well. It's looking like a three horse race all of a sudden. Pup t 10:34, 6/08/2009

And I thought you were exited by me!? Do your kisses mean nothing?    Orian57    Talk   12:47 6 August 2009

• I would for, but she is sadly also ineligible. First contrib stretches back to June 9th. Start checking these things before you nominate, guys. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:34, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

I did, but as I was half asleep at the time I honestly thought it said July. My bad. Pup t 07:23, 7/08/2009

• Thanks so much for nominating me! Yes, I was here for only one day on 69 right before finals, then disappeared because I moved for the summer. Then I posted like a crazy girl because I'm in the middle of nowhere and bored. I know, technically that disqualifies me. (Insert Appropriate Profanity Here). But thanks so much! Miley Spears 21:20, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Aaaawwww, you'll always be my noob of the month. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:32, 7 Aug

Miley Spears (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Renom despite technical ineligibility. Look, technically, both her and Sid are not eligible. So what? They're still noobs, and damn good ones. I think, we should obey the spirit of the rules, rather than the letter. -- mysterious Ape (reduce) (Riot Porn) 22:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but she misses this by just under two months, not just over one. Letting her complete wouldn't just be a slight adjustment of the rules, it'd be a complete mockery. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:28, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. Isn't Uncyclopedia in favor of complete mockery? But check--she was here for one day then came back a month and half later which was only two weeks ago. Do we kill her for one day? Binky The WonderSkull 01:18, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• Voice your opinion at Forum:Noob eligibility requirements. Or not. Binky The WonderSkull 01:21, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• Naked response (that usually gets peeps attention). Thanks for the unauthorized kudos! And I voiced my opinion too. :) Miley Spears 19:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Siddhartha-Wolf (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom & For - see above. -- mysterious Ape (reduce) (Riot Porn) 22:03, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
• For; because he's really cool. Staircase CUN^t 02:22, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain because of my comments on someone else. But maybe an award for Most Noob Edits of User Pages? Binky The WonderSkull 03:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Not sure I've been editing anyone's User pages (aside from my own), apart from sticking "Noob of the Month" nominations on them. I'm sure you mean "talk pages" and you're quite right.--El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 09:41, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

This issue is still under discussion, until there is a decision made, stop nominating invalid candidates.. ~ 09:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

The result was to not be so strict on the rules. Does that count for anything? Miley Spears 01:25, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

September 2009

Writer of the Month

MacMania (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 15 disciples of Jobs

• Nom&StrongFor. Let me introduce you to my good colleague MacMania. Last month, this beast of a writer churned out 3 very funny articles: Firefly, UnScripts:Star Wars (2010), and Pixar. The month before that, he got two features: Cheerios and Sherlock Holmes. To top it all off, he's got two articles up for feature as I write this: Alien and UnScripts:Les Misérables, Abrégés. Fellow Uncyclopedians, the choice is clear: MacMania for WotM. Thank you. /steps off podium. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 03:21, Sep 1
• One more thing ... HA! You fell for that, didn't you? Nope, not a single more thing. Ha! Half of you people must have paid for the keynote just to hear what one more thing I had, didn't you!
  
  Anyway. Yes, thank you very much. I'll just walk over to the ballot box right there ... Sir MacMania GUN—[03:33 1 Sep 2009]

  Actually, just one more thing—also on VFH is UnBooks:An Authentic Journal of Travelers on the Oregon Trail Sir MacMania GUN—[00:16 4 Sep 2009]). I know, I spelled 'travellers' with one 'l'. I had to keep the local dialect, didn't I? Eh? Sir MacMania GUN—[03:48 1 Sep 2009]

  Oh, and PS: someone please get Psyché into the feature queue. Sir MacMania GUN—[03:50 1 Sep 2009]

  Annoying when that isn't changed on time, isn't it? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 12:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

  For fuck's sake. So we don't always stand beside a computer ready to change the feature exactly as the clock strikes midnight. Whoopee shit. Most of the time it gets changed fairly soon after. And more importantly, idiots get banned, cyberbullying gets deleted, vandalism gets dealt with, people get helped out, talked to, encouraged or warned, and work gets done. The world DOES NOT END if the feature doesn't change dead on time. This little insidious drip drip drip of comments you keep making doesn't help - it just winds people up. Annoying when people get really anal about certain things, isn't it? --UU - natter 12:56, Sep 1

  Sorry. Bit of a hasty comment. Yeah, admins do have users and vandalism to monitor (note: and, of course, real life [15:18 1 Sep 2009]), so it's quite understandable. I'll just sneak back out now ... Sir MacMania GUN—[15:15 1 Sep 2009]

  Er, that was aimed more at the King of the comment about the feature queue, Monsieur Enstein. --UU - natter 20:21, Sep 1

  Sorry again, I guess. Checked out the history, so now I've got context. I must be feeling very guilty about something here ... Sir MacMania GUN—[21:00 1 Sep 2009]

• Strong For. In my opinion, one of the top 5 writers we have here, and he's only been here two months. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 12:42, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
• For. A natural at this lark. --UU - natter 12:57, Sep 1
• For Having reviewed several of his articles I can safely say he is a very good writer. --Sequence 14:47, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For. And that Oregon Trail article is just brilliant.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 18:34, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For per above. --Mn-z 18:36, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
• Most definitely. He writes feature after feature. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
• Certainly--Sog1970 07:45, September 3, 2009 (UTC)
• yes yes yes yes! Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 02:27 September 5 '09
• For. I died on the Oregon Trail, and my lower body got eaten for breakfast. That's why I'm Binky The WonderSkull 17:52, September 5, 2009 (UTC)
• For. So predictable.. whaditellye! Now you have to like wait a month for a shiny trophy that you know youre gonna get. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 08:08, September 6, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Always a difficult one to review, you have to work so hard to find something bad to say, translation = he is very good at this.--ChiefjusticeDS 20:24, September 18, 2009 (UTC)
• For. It's about time a Scottish sounding name won this award. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 21:44, September 18, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Clearly deserves this. --^Dame 15:08, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• Nom. Though I've already given my vote to Mac, PotR deserves at least a nomination. As of now he's got three really strong features, and is on his way to a fourth (and hopefully fifth, if ya'll were sophisticated enough to appreciate Isaac The Tank Engine). He ranks among the most well read and sophisticated users here (as far as I can tell, anyway), and deserves at least to be in the running for this award. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:19, September 5, 2009 (UTC)

• Self-against As much as I appreciate the nod, I'm not quite at the level that either yourself or Mac are at the moment, and I was actually going to lend my support to Mac this month, pending bribe, except that up until today there hasn't been another contender. And again as much as I appreciate it, MacMania all the way! (Who's name actually comes from Mac meaning son of, and Mania meaning hyperactive insanity - how can you not love it?) Pup t 03:41, 5/09/2009
• Comment. You're a great writer, Puppy. But I'll respect your wishes and not vote for you. -- Binky The WonderSkull 18:00, September 5, 2009 (UTC)

• For. - Fuck you I'm voting for you anyway! -- mysterious Ape (reduce) (Riot Porn) 12:45, September 16, 2009 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Syndrome (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom Another hard-worker. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:24, September 5, 2009 (UTC)
• Wut Thanks for the nom, but the only thing I do around here that can be considered "work" is secretly inserting typos into Modusoperandi's articles. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 19:19, September 5, 2009 (UTC)

  That's why you deserve it. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:20, September 5, 2009 (UTC)

Zana Dark (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• nom for the portals. --Mn-z 18:38, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For. A hard working contributor to this site who has done a lot of work to make this site a lot more user friendly. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 21:55, September 18, 2009 (UTC)

Bonner (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -0

• Nom Cause Hyperbole needs a challenger. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:36, September 1, 2009 (UTC)

  Loln00b. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

  FU! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:40, September 1, 2009 (UTC)

  Minus zero? Holy shit I must be bad. (Bonner) (Talk) Sep 1, 21:37

Hyperbole (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +15

• nom +4 per last month. --Mn-z 05:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
• Foar. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 05:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
• tiny dick. He is the anti-RAHB. -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 09:48, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
• Obvious For.  —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:08, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
• For. - Les' make that +4 a +5 (Bonner) (Talk) Sep 1, 21:39
• For. IronLung 23:31, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
• Bless. He may be a noob but I think he has a lot of potential. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 00:43, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
• An intelligent voice of reason on the site... mostly. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:39, Sep 2
• Because I dont understand what his name means Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 02:21 September 5 '09
• for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 04:38, September 7, 2009 (UTC)
• This user is the most talented Uncyclopedian, ever. Not only that, but he's also the most handsome man in the world. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:20, 15 Sep
• Very for. --^Dame 15:18, September 27, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Although I'm slightly worried he may be running out of things to win, which he has admitted motivates him, at least in part. So I'm already considering voting against him for WotY... --UU - natter 07:22, Sep 30
• For You mean he hasn't won this yet?    Orian57    Talk   07:30 30 September 2009
• Aye, he has done much... Not that I can remember any of what he has done, but I'm sure it exists. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 07:37, September 30, 2009 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

Monkeyhuffer (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: o

• Nom Can't spell, but has made a lot of constructive edits. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 19:17, September 5, 2009 (UTC)

Why do I need to provide this? (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 21 people who won't provide this

• NF Seems promising, provided he's not a sockpuppet. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 05:04, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For. not RCmurphy. --Mn-z 05:10, September 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For. being such a little good user.--Almost Sir Random Crap
• Why do I need to explain this? Sir MacMania GUN—[03:40 8 Sep 2009]
• For. Useful, n'stuff. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:11, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
• For my Baby. How can I not vote for my own little girl? Or little boy? I don't know which it is because I haven't changed a diaper yet. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 05:13, September 8, 2009 (UTC)
• Wow. I almost shot myself in jealousy when I saw one of his reviews. Wait, this isn't RotM. Oh well I can see him being famous in 2 months, 3 tops. METHAMPHETAMINE! ZOMG HOLY SHIT (22:38 09-8-2009)
• Why not? Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:56,8September,2009
• Because I vandalized his page YAY With Savings, most probably.  –              zh              06:39 September 10
• Long Dong's Burgers and Bongs... um... yea, he's good and stuff. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:20, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

  Honestly, I don't quite know what i mean either. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:20, September 11, 2009 (UTC)

• aye Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 11:35 September 11 '09
• Yessir. Two decent articles in less than a month was more than I did. He's polite, too. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:02, Sep 11
• How could I not vote for my own nephew? (I know... I looked.) Pup t 07:43, 13/09/2009
• For'n stuff.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 15:23, September 13, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Per the name and kinda reeks of usefulness Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:44, September 15, 2009 (UTC)
• Absolutely --Sog1970 08:51, September 20, 2009 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:23, 21 September 2009
• For Some good work done all around the site. He deserves it. --ChiefjusticeDS 21:26, September 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Sure thing. Took to this place like a whore takes to crack. pillow talk 18:50, September 22, 2009 (UTC)
• For. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 11:30, September 23, 2009 (UTC)
• for. promising indeed. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 02:05, September 24, 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• future heavyweight champion of the world right here -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 00:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
• Sonvabitch stole mah wallet. Quite noob. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:37, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

*For as per awesome. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 01:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

• Comment for crying out loud its the 1st. Shouldn't we wait until at least mid month to vote for the joke nominations? --Mn-z 05:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
  • In short, No. The longer answer would, of course, be: Fuck no. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 16:32, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Per Mnbvcxz. -OptyC Sucks! CUN23:16, 2 Sep
• Weak Abstain because there's a competitor. With Savings, most probably.  –              zh              06:40 September 10
• For. Too little competition. Colin ALL YOUR BASEHeaney! Casa Bey Superfly Portfolio 21:23, September 12, 2009 (UTC)

October 2009

Writer of the Month

205.56.145.34 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom Hasn't contributed much recently, but I don't think he has gotten enough recognitions for the advances he's made in humor writing and how we perceive Uncyclopedia today. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 19:40, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. Thank you for giving Puppy some competition. I looked through this editor's history. This user has been here for 3 1/2 years and, with the possible exception of one or two edits, has done some productive work here. Worth considering. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 21:55, October 28, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment They say you can tell the measure of a man in his competition. I feel cheap. Pup 22:13, 28/10/2009

I've seen your competition. They're mostly listed above under "People who already done won this thing." WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:16, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

• Spiritual For. If only I hadn't voted for PotR. *sigh* • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 02:51, Oct 29 2009
• Jimmy Hoffa -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:40, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
• For - I don't know who 205.56.145.34 is, but I have arbitrarily decided that POTR sucks balls, so I'm voting against him. And no, I am not trying to artificially perpetuate a "Dan Kwon" Uncyclopedia joke meme that everyone will hate by late 2010 from overuse. -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 08:16, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
  • Funny Story, you can actually just use sucks balls. It's a winner. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 08:19, October 29, 2009 (UTC)
    • Thanks. I'll remember that. That and go eat shit fuckers. -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 08:21, October 29, 2009 (UTC)

PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 18

• Nom and 4. He has pheatured so many articles in such a short space of time, he will get this award sooner or later anyway Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 16:56, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
• For. I love first day votes. • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 17:05 October 1 '09
• Woof? Bark? In any case, here is a fantastic writer. Sir MacMania GUN—[22:15 1 Oct 2009]
• $puppy$[/zh] 09:21 October 2
• For, per my nom last month. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 12:24, October 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For because I get the fuzzies --Morgz789 13:42, October 3, 2009 (UTC)
• For. For the woofer on the wireless. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 21:17, October 5, 2009 (UTC)
• For. One of the most intellectual writers we've had on this site. Not only have I laughed much reading his articles, but I've also learned enough about the human mind so that I can carry on conversations with hot pysch majors. :) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 22:07, Oct 10

• Ah, I'm all about the pursuit of psych majors happiness! Pup t 01:36, 11/10/2009

• <vanity>I know that I am good,</vanity><self-deprecation> because I laugh at my junk all the time.</self-deprecation> Pup t 01:36, 11/10/2009
• Do it. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:12, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment - he can't win. Not really. Only a couple of months ago I wrote his front page blurb for winning NOTM, and you expect me to write something new?!?!? I'm only human you know! ~ 21:16, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

  It's okay, I didn't actually read it last month anyway. Pup t 23:47, 12/10/2009

  Bastard. ~ 15:02, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

• For. --Sog1970 13:33, October 16, 2009 (UTC)
• For. He writes well (also gets along well, listens to me and follows my suggestions well, and pees well--don't ask me how I know). Also he's my uncle. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 06:41, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Seriously, I swear I voted on this weeks ago! Is this what madness feels like? --ChiefjusticeDS 13:44, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
• For As per this. Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 14:31, October 20, 2009 (UTC)
• For bandwagons. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:38 Oct 28 2009
• Bark! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:04, 30 October 2009
• ЗА ПOТР! I guess he should get this prize. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 21:54, October 30, 2009 (UTC)
• For. I love casting the deciding vote. --UU - natter 17:07, Oct 31
• Sorry mate, this is the deciding vote. ~ 23:57, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

ChiefjusticeDS (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 10

• Nom, but certainly not for This guy has done lots of anti-vandal work along with his writing and review work. Um... Yeah. Cause I like there to be competition. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:04, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
  • To quote Guildy, I don't know why you find the notion of voting for so objectionable as to need to amend that, but fair enough. --ChiefjusticeDS 18:06, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
    • Because. The word for makes me think of a whore. I'm certainly not for whores. Women should be paid for sex, not taken advantage of by getting them drunk or by marrying them. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:15, October 31, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Gives great advice and valuable proofreading support. --BlueSpiritGuy 12:14, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Good man/woman/android. Friendly and helpful. ~ 12:55, October 7, 2009 (UTC)
• What Mr. Jew said • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 22:58 October 7 '09
• For The Chief has been very helpful and polite (is that possible on a Wiki?), done a great number of Pee Reviews, and helped resolve a conflict I got involved in. Go Chief! WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:52, October 9, 2009 (UTC)
• For. He deserves this long ago Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 15:08, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
• For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 18:45, October 18, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Surprise tiebreaker! --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:52, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
• For. --Sog1970 13:43, October 25, 2009 (UTC)
• For watching my house... supposedly. Donutmancuzco,23:21,Oct,26,2009 (UTC)
• Yup. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:06, 30 October 2009
• Strong Against. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 18:04, 30 Oct
  • But... why? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 11:26, Oct 31 2009
    • Let's not go there, OK? --UU - natter 17:09, Oct 31
• For. Has taken the weight of checking Cajek's list off my shoulders, which is vastly appreciated. --UU - natter 17:09, Oct 31

Count of Monkey Crisco (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 8

• Nom+For. For his work in the Uncyclopedia basement bringing to our attention articles/pages/stubs/vanity pieces that should be thrown into the incinerator. It's a dirty job but someone has to do it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 05:53, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. If you nominate someone, please add the nom template to their user page. I was nommed for something and it wasn't until there was only hours left in the month that someone finally added the template to my page! I might never have known about it and voters who visit a nominee's page might not either. :) DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 02:27, October 6, 2009 (UTC)

• For.[/zh] 09:36 October 2
• For. per above. --Mn-z 04:57, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
• Cool. -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 06:12, October 4, 2009 (UTC)
• Aye. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 02:56, Oct 5
• For. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 00:58 Oct 20 2009
• For. Surprise equaliser! --ChiefjusticeDS 10:31, October 22, 2009 (UTC)
• For. The suspense! --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 17:19, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

Pentium5dot1 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom & For Extremely helpful user for quite a while now. Has been editing, and fixing up UN:RA for forever now, among other things. His not so well known-ness doesn't change the fact that he is an awesome user. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 16:38, October 7, 2009 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

BlueSpiritGuy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +9

• Nom & For. I have been waiting for someone to write something about Julius Malema and he pulled this one off great so far and shows some promise in his writing. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 10:57, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
• For: Shows a great deal of promise and writes well. Is also my adopted n00b, so I was hardly going to vote any other way. --ChiefjusticeDS 11:07, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Julius Malema was a very nice article. This kid can write. Also, is it just me or is Uncyc receiving a massive influx of South African users? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 22:50, Oct 11
• For. Because Malema said “Beautiful girls are found in the ANC. If you want to get married, you must choose to get married in the ANC and vote for BlueSpiritGuy." WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 20:36, October 12, 2009 (UTC)
• For as a protest vote against rcmurphy, as according to UN:HS he and I are on par! Pup t 23:41, 12/10/2009
• For Good articles. 20:55. October 12, 2009 (UTC) {Mikario}
• For the South African invasion of Uncyc! --^Dame 10:58, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Afrikaans. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:10, 30 October 2009
• For the man with the clipboard said I should learn to love myself, and that starts with voting for me.--BlueSpiritGuy 22:00, October 31, 2009 (UTC)

Sircabhan (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• Nom He's here. He's queer. Get used to it. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 02:59, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
• For. I want to encourage the little guy (is he vertically challenged btw ?). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 11:00, October 25, 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -1

• still the future heavyweight champion of the world right here -- Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D 02:01, October 1, 2009 (UTC)
• Weak Abstain. Too bad. [/zh] 09:00 October 1
• Against. Sorry, but I don't think you've been here long enough to be Noob of the Month. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:54, October 6, 2009 (UTC)
• For. A stand-up n00b. Excellent form. Wot. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 01:27, Oct 11
• Against The time is not yet ripe. —rc (t) 03:10, October 21, 2009 (UTC)
  • So, you'll win next month? [b]- zhelili ??? 05:27 October 21
    • I win every month. It's just a question of degree. —rc (t) 04:36, October 28, 2009 (UTC)

November 2009

Writer of the Month

Zim ulator (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 13

• Nom and for Made, and continues to make, UnNews what it is. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 00:12, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

• I'd add the vote template to his page but it's locked, and I'm kind of afraid to talk to him. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 00:13, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

• Resident most awesome Uncyclopedian. -- Also, penis. 17:44, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
• Za Go go reverend Zimmie Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 13:11, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
• Aye. All hail the god of UnNews. • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 13:15, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
• yep, he welcomed me to unnews. Also, zim has the rare z. Like in my name(: in rememberanz of all teh siggies 05:22 November 12
• For. Recognition in keeping the UnNews page alive through thick and thin. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:12, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
• Fwhore. Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 02:09, November 16, 2009 (UTC)
• For. -- Style  Guide 19:58, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
• For Zim being Zim. MrN  Fork you! 06:33, Nov 26
• Yes. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:55, 28 Nov
• Absolutely.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 20:13, 28 November 2009
• He is the dirt under our rollers. ~ 19:05, November 29, 2009 (UTC)
• Zim per his zimulating reverendness. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:23, 1 December 2009

EvilZak (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom A nod towards one of the writers who helped to create Uncyclopedia back in the day, and whose articles I have re-read a few times and am impressed that it has withstood the test of time. Hope that in 2013 someone could say the same about me. Pup

• Haha, not a chance. Noob. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 01:11, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

• Against. As per (Ger's) Syndrome. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill | 06:35, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian Of The Month

Why do I need to provide this? (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 8

• Nom. Because I can. • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 11:44, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
• Yes. A fine user; does good stuff at Pee Review, helps out noobs, and has a lighthearted, cheery demeanor. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 00:33, Nov 2 2009
• For. In October he did 21 detailed Pee Reviews, Welcomed 177 people, wrote two Featured Articles, helped with several articles for other ppl that got featured, made Images for a featured article and made a bunch of images for other articles and made a Ninja Star, and did more Proofreads than anybody. Plus he's nice. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 19:12, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For. If all that is true then he has my vote. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 19:14, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Very few people have the patience to siff through other people's shit... Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 22:06, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. Thanks so much. But I do feel I should clarify that one of "my" two featured articles in October was actually co-written by Syndrome and myself. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 00:53, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
• For. It is only your second/third month, but with all the work you are putting in this is inevitable. So I thought I'd quickly creep out of my hibernating status and put down a vote. --BlueSpiritGuy 20:00, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
• For., because- wait. Why do I need to provide this? in rememberanz of all teh siggies 05:27 November 12
• For. Often, I think this award is really awarded for "Best Uncyclopedian who's been around a while and we haven't honored yet." And I'd give that award to Necro. But if we're really voting on the last month's contributions, I think Why? takes this in a landslide. pillow talk 22:58, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Bless. Because I just got an edit conflict with myself... Would you like a cookie, sir? 11:47,19November,2009

Necropaxx (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7

• Nom and for. Because I can't. Update: I made up my mind! • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 11:44, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Fine for me Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 20:37, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
• For. A generally useful user that's deserved this for a while now. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 01:09, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
  • Generally?! I kid, I kid. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 02:33, Nov 4 2009
• For. I won't let Necropaxx out-noble me with his vote, plus he's contributed a great deal to this site (Features, Pee Reviews, Things I'm not old enough to know about) and is our favorite Uncyclopedian Angel of Death. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 15:41, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
• Deserves it better than Andorin. Actually, I don't know this guy's work that well, but he's actually behaving nice around me. ^_^ -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 05:34, 12 Nov

  One, I already said I don't want UotM. Two, I'm nearly one hundred percent certain that votes like "deserves it more than xxxx" aren't legitimate. --Andorin Kato 05:36, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

  Go stick your legitimisation up your arse. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 05:38, 12 Nov

  Thank you for proving my point. --Andorin Kato 05:40, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

  This is the second time in a row Luvvy voted on UotM out of spite. One might start to worry. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 05:44, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

• Oh, and before I forget: For. --Andorin Kato 05:55, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. I just want it said that I love this 3-way tie thing; if we could keep this and all 3 of us get the award (looks sternly at Andorin) I would be the happiest Uncyclopedian ever. :D • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Thursday, 06:06, Nov 12 2009
• For. ~ 10:03, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

Andorin Kato (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 11

• Dig. Recently returned from hiatus and has been QVFD-ing, BP-ing, RC-ing, and reporting vandalisms and bannables in IRC to me more than is particularly convenient toward my cause of lazing around and accomplishing nothing. So he also causes me to accomplish things. And anyone who can get an admin to do that must deserve this award. Or a spanking. Oh, and he also writes! Got a feature last month. -- Also, penis. 20:17, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
• Potch. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 09:26, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
• I would actually like to withdraw from this. --Andorin Kato 04:30, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

  Comment. Why do you want to withdraw? But if you do, ppl should let you. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 07:28, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

  Well, if it becomes an issue, I just refuse the award. :P --Andorin Kato 07:30, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

  And as for your question, I just don't feel like I need to be UotM. Let someone else who does something besides clean up vandalism (as in, someone who writes and fixes articles and makes the wiki a better place) get the award. --Andorin Kato 07:33, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

  But...you do all of those things! -- Also, penis. 17:46, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

• For per above. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 04:33, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

• Comment Originally I just voted because he didn't want the award, but since he singlehandedly keeps back vandalism on the wiki and given the sheer number of times he's beaten me to a revert by mere seconds, the for stays. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 02:38, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

• For As per the penis. Where the Wild Colins Are - LET THE WILD RUMPUS START! 05:53, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
• Extra Super Extremist For as per Andorin is awesome and has always been and will always be. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 04:38, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Tie him up and fu...I mean force him to accept it, if need be. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 17:51, November 6, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. I still wish to withdraw from this. If you would like my reasoning, go here. --Andorin Kato 06:34, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Because it would amuse me to give this to someine who doesn't want it. Plus he deserves it. Self deprecation aside, the day to day maintanance he does is important. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:06, 14 Nov
• Four...er, For! As per kangaroo. Love,  
• Fine, I won't withdraw. Curse you, Ethine, for changing my mind. With your lecherous, non-Catholic ways. --Andorin Kato 07:27, November 16, 2009 (UTC)

  But your vote remains with Necropaxx, right? /me looks confused at the score —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:16, 18 November 2009

  I'd feel weird voting for myself. --Andorin Kato 21:42, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

  Yeah, but doesn't everything (up until Multi's vote) add up to 8 then? /me look even more confused at the score —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:40, 18 November 2009

  ...correct, it does. What's wrong with the score? Now you're confusing me. --Andorin Kato 22:47, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

  Weird. How did I count that wrong? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:20, 18 November 2009

• For. -- Style  Guide 20:05, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Yea This dude earns his keep. And he amuses us. Cheers! Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 22:36, November 26, 2009 (UTC)
• Last Minute For. He's going to win this either way. And he deserves it! Maybe Necropaxx and Why? will have more luck next time. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:16, 1 December 2009

I voted for Necropaxx before Andorin was nominated (Necropaxx already voted for me, so there's was nothing noble about my vote). But Andorin does the kind of behind the scenes work that doesn't get noticed in other categories. I conceed the election and give my congratulations! WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 01:22, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah me too. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 01:40, Dec 1 2009

Well, I'm not bloody conceding... the challenge is on - the gauntlet is thrown! Pup

PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -1

• Nom and Against I don't really want to vote For anyone, because that would mean that I'm voting Against the other two, and none of the three candidates deserve to not win... or something. So if I vote against myself as a candidate, then that will mean there's one less vote against someone else. Pup

Noob of the month

BlueSock (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom Has a userpage. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 15:26, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

• Comment Ah, the user page was actually created by me to avoid confusion between him and BLUESOCK. Pup

• Well normally, I'd be ashamed to vote for myself, but seeing as how I'm at zero this is becoming a pride thing. --BlueSock 02:03, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. This is one of the people I was going to nominate. I know this is technically for last month, but as one of these people has had significantly more time here than the other, I'm going to wait until longer in the month to vote. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 03:56, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

Aleister in Chains (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom I hate this guy. I'm putting him here so we can keep an eye on him. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 15:24, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
• Intent to vote for. Has contributed quite a lot and been a generally pretty nice person within only a few short days. If he can keep it up for another week or two, he's got my vote. -- Also, penis. 16:03, November 1, 2009 (UTC) Forgot about the other one. This guy will be eligible in a month, right? Right? -- Also, penis. 06:45, November 3, 2009 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure AiC will be eligible next month, just barely. Also I think The Babe Over There On The Right shows some definite potential. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 05:07, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

• Comment: Would advise a 'no' vote. This user is scared of ghosts and caligrophy, and last time I saw him he was inhaling glue. I put my 'yes' on the nose of the Filly. Aleister in Chains 16:53, November 5, 2009 (UTC)
• For. I think he may have a real skull on the table and some pickled toads in a cupboard but might put the hex on me if I don't vote for him. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:29, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

Hiatus Hernia (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1.5

• Nom Noobish. Monthly. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 15:20, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
• Spiritual For If I hadn't already tipped my hat to Puffskein I'd be tempted to vote here. Some good writing there. Keep it up! Pup
• Bless.in rememberanz of all teh siggies 09:20 November 2
• Half For. I'm splitting my vote (hey, anonymous IPs do it, why can't I?) WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:26, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. User:Hiatus Hernia/HowTo:Write Colin Meloy Lyrics looks good. Damnit, we have too many promising noobs this month! Can I split my vote into quarters? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 05:16, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Puffskein (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 12.5

• Nom and for Already a featured writer. She's salty, and she's into latex. Pup
• DIG All contributors 14-17 should be leaving her inconsequential messages on her talk, thinly veiling the lustful interest felt knowing that she is an intelligent female, and a pretty damn fine writer to boot. She's got tits, people! --THINKER 21:09, November 1, 2009 (UTC)

• Hiatus Hernia is a girl too, and I will not have anyone tell me otherwise. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:20, November 1, 2009 (UTC)
• Have you been stalking me? That guy masturbating outside my window was you, wasn't it? (screams in a girly way)(btw, thx for the nom, no thanks for the added userbox) --~ 06:14, 2009 Nov 2

• Featured Writer + Girl = For • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 06:49, Nov 2 2009
• Gi.. Gil... Gir... Girl? what does that word mean? I'll just assume that it's something good. For. • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 07:07, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
• Dig -- Also, penis. 20:27, November 2, 2009 (UTC)
• But of course. Noob feature picture show Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 22:12, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. This is one of the people I was going to nominate. I know this is technically for last month, but as one of these people has had significantly more time here than the other, I'm going to wait until longer in the month to vote. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 03:57, November 3, 2009 (UTC)
• For Good enough for me. Mikario
• Four!!, no, For Thought I was golfing there for a moment. I used to date Madeline, and she's caught her essence, her soul, perfectly. Aleister in Chains 11:25, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
• Half For. I'm splitting my vote (hey, anonymous IPs do it, why can't I?) WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 02:26, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Well, once again my parent doesn't think I'm good enough. hmmff.--Puffskein 03:17, November 12, 2009 (UTC)

Ah, don't think that dear. I just don't want to be accused of nepotism. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 07:22, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

• For Even though you don't visit enough. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 03:23, November 12, 2009 (UTC)
• For Better writer than me. Can also photoshop, unlike me. --~ 15:46, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

• Better-looking, too. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:46, November 13, 2009 (UTC)

• For -- Style  Guide 20:02, November 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Good n00b is good. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:26, 1 December 2009

Colin "All your base" Heaney (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

• Nom okay, bugger the whole time window thing. He's still a n00b! Pup

Sorry. The only person we're allowed to nominate who doesn't qualify is RC Cola, or RCA, or whatever it's name is. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 15:48, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Say, I just noticed the part that said we can nom and for Rcmurphy even though he's completely unqualified isn't up there anymore. What happened? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 15:50, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

OK, it's back now. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 15:52, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2.5

• Nom Has a userpage and also doesn't qualify. There's too many qualified candidates. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 15:58, November 4, 2009 (UTC)
• For :P 77.113.16.153 15:10, November 7, 2009 (UTC)
• For. I've heard of this guy! -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:52, 28 Nov
• For. Looks pretty cool to me. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! 21:04, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

December 2009

Writer of the Month

Asahatter (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Only right, having stumbled upon his excellent BBC Wireless 4 that dragged me back here. Printer Ink also. --Nikau 11:13, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

  Holy smoke guys it's Nikau. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 05:45, Dec 14 2009

• Default For, seeing as he's currently the only good writer nominated. Also, Printer Ink is the best article.-- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:32, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

• I don't see on UN:R where it says admins are exempt. Is there a special clause that only smart people can see? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 04:34, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

• I don't understand what you just said. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:50, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

• I guess I'll take that as a no. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 05:03, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

• Its not that admins are exempt from Rule #2, it just that nobody is able to hold an admin accountable for his/her actions, if that makes you feel any better. --Mn-z 17:37, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

• For. Because voting for myself is what TKF would do.

On a side note, thanks for the backhanded FU TKF. Good show, cheers.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 20:16, 15 December 2009

Yeah, that dude's a faggot if you guys haven't noticed. (It's because he has no friends.) —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:11, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

On a sider side not, I always read this guy's name as "ASS Hatter". As in, he's calling himself an ass hat. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:24, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

Zana Dark (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 21

• NF I didn't realize until recently but Zana Dark has written some stuff. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:42, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
• For.. Zana Dark is one of those contributors who tends to be overlooked. She can also can also multitask : write articles , format pages , photoshop pictures and is very helpful to n00bs. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:07, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
• For I like the smart ass rewrite. --Matfen 12:20, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
• For Zana's the best!  TALK  FRESH MEAT  ♥ talk to me 16:59 9 December 2009
• ur #1! ur my hero zana!!!!!1!1! Prezident of teh offishul unoffishul Zana Dark fan club
• FTW I would never have develpoed my cage fighting skills to this degree if not for her.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  04:41, December 10, 2009 (UTC)
• Phwhore I digs zana shes awesum. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 10:05, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
• FlourI like her Dark side, and the Zana side too. Aleister in Chains 10:58, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
• For. I think my girlfriend would break up with me if I didn't vote for the author of Frida Kahlo. pillow talk 06:48, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
• yea go mommy! —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 02:00, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:40, 15 Dec
• For.. Zana Dark is good writer, evil, talented, funny, has a great UnNews audio presentation, is nice to me, has an excellent mustache and eight vaginas. How could I possibly vote against that? Cheers! Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 22:38, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• For. I tried to think of a sexist joke/pun, but couldn't. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:13, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Someone told me she had a... hard-on? Well that is not the issue here. -- Style  Guide 14:28, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Shit, I swear I voted here a week ago. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME • 14:45 • Thursday, 17-12-2009
• For. per above. --Mn-z 16:53, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Writes some good stuffs, I am sure I have reviewed some in the past. --ChiefjusticeDS 22:58, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• For a talented writer. And no, not because she's got breasts. That's nothing to do with it. ~ 16:39, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• For Wonderful Zana Dark! Visiting Myself from This Future 00:19, December 28, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Because she's a good writer. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:26, 31 December 2009
• Certainly!--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 19:57, December 31, 2009 (UTC)

Uncyclopedian of the Month

Why do I need to provide this? (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 12 who expose themselves only when they want to

• Nom&For. Since coming here, Why has been an amazingly positive influence on our fair wiki. He does Pee Reviews. He welcomes users. He's adopted many n00bs. He's written some funny articles (which does count as improving the site, IMO). He's an all-around nice guy. He's a definite candidate for UotM. Vote for him. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 14:54, Dec
• For.. For the last two months Whyner did more proofreads than anyone, welcome a couple hundred people, did 28 Pee Reviews, and got his first three articles all featured. Last month he got his adopted noob to NotM and adopted another noob. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 01:04, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For. For several reasons. First, I nommed both necro and why last month, and voted for necro, so this time, I vote for why. Second, necro has already won WoTM, and is a GUN. Why hasn't won any of the two major awards yet. Or didn't he? Third, because I can. Fourth, pants. • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 15:05, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
• Why??? Because over the last few months he's been one of the more active members that I have turned to for proofing, PEEs and to take care of noobs. He has spoken out when he feels that there is something to speak out about and from what I can tell he has an amazing sense of integrity which means that he has voted against contributors on VFH when he has felt that their efforts haven't been strong enough to warrant the front page, despite what he feels about the contributor personally. And while I feel that Necropaxx is also an extremely active member of the community, puts in a huge amount of effort to make this place continue to tick over, I feel that his major contributions have been in his writing and collaborations, whereas Why??? has put aside his own desire to have his articles on front page and concentrated on helping others. He is one of the main reasons why I have the time to sit back and continue to write while knowing that the community is in safe hands. This is the written equivalent of a standing ovation for a fantastic member of the community. Pup
• For. I've been told by one of his stalkers that he is a very kind gent. I can't quite remember all the stuff she said about him being a pervert and a narcissist though. --Matfen 12:24, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
• For per last month. Highly active on the wiki; very helpful. pillow talk 02:19, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• Competition. zhel☃el 04:01 December 15
• per above --Mn-z 20:01, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Rabbi, save me. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 13:43, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Why not? --Sog1970 18:14, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• For. It's near the end of the month! Tie! ~ 17:58, Dec 26, 2009
• For.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 06:28, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

Necropaxx (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 15 who see dead people and invite them to tea

• NF- yet again we'll have the battle of the titans. I think this one Mormon old timer need a pat on the shoulder for all the good he contributed to Uncyclopedia over a long time. ~ 19:42, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
• For. - yet again? Yes! Necropaxx wrote many featured articles including one last month, made many images, done Pee Reviews, and is really nice for a dead guy. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 20:10, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

• I don't know what disturbs me more - the fact that you guys are serious or the fact that neither of you can grasp the concept that is English grammar. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 23:54, Dec

I got a good excuse, I can make spelling mistakes in 5 languages. And you? ~ 00:01, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

Pshhh. I can make spelling mistakes in every language! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 00:10, Dec

Insulting people who vote for you is not a good idea. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 00:58, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

It's a test of their faith. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! 02:10, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

• This faggot deserves it. -OptyC Sucks! CUN01:00, 2 Dec
• For. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! 02:10, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Necro's pretty much off the heazy. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:20, Dec 2
• Yes. --Andorin Kato 02:24, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Per last month. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:40, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
• For. <insert long-winded speech a la POTR here> --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:47, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

Penis penis penis penis penis penis penis penis penis penis penis, penis penis penis penis penis penis penis penis penis penis penis penis penis. Penus? Penises penii peniseses penis peniser penisest penisester penisesterest! Penis penis Penis penis penis penis Penis penis. penis penis penis. Pup

Hey, man! That's my thing! FUCK YEAH I AM SO PUNK ROCK! 02:08, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

Penis -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:56, 17 Dec

• You Betch'a Has made good, as have they all. But this one insults his supporters, the sign of a true contraianuncyclopedian. Now, look in awe at the pretty hyp-no-tizing picture. Aleister in Chains 00:41, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
• For. For Necropaxx whose name reminds me of Death Packaging . Perhaps he could use this once he leaves school and goes into business. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:52, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
• For He's kind of Necropaxxy. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 20:04, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
• For I think he deserves this one, ever so slightly more than Why? --ChiefjusticeDS 22:42, December 30, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Necropaxx has been quietly doing a very good job around here for a long time, and I appreciate that. --UU - natter 09:34, Dec 31
• For.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 17:29, 31 December 2009
• Lethal Peace X For. And he's a mormon too! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:12, 1 January 2010

Simsilikesims (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom - I think the lady still deserves recognition. ~ 11:24, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
• FYI, she's got over 2,500 good edits on main pages!!! All three of these people should do a triple-Siamese twin thing so they could all win at once (then display themselve(s) at carnivals and circuses worldwide) and save money at all-you-can-eat-buffets. Nice work, indeed. Aleister in Chains 03:39, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

  Nice of you to check every one of those edits. But I don't know if I want to be a conjoined triplet. I guess it would depend on how we're connected. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 03:51, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

• For. someone's gotta go against this month's two-party voting system and I'm glad it's ms sims User:Fag/sig5 16:37, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

Noob of the Month

Aleister in Chains (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 8.5

• Nom and Half For. Splitting my vote again. At the end of the first month, created started 1, 2, 3, 4 (possibly started, but definitely worked on), 5, 6, 7 articles and edited more. (I'm waiting to vote until newer noobs have had a chance). WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 06:01, December 1, 2009 (UTC) Update WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:04, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• For. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:25, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
• This user dates sheep Aleister in Chains December 23, Festivus, 2009 (UTC)
• For Given what he did earlier today.<insert name here> December, 2009 (UTC) . . .(excuse this foreknowledge, forget you saw this. Just trying to shake some glitches out of this damn time-machine I've made my nephew for Christmas. It's running about a day ahead, so hand me that screwdriver. Yeah, OK, that'll do it, should clear up soon. Pup 07:22, 6 December, 2009 (UTC))
• For I'm not sure why... Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 22:51, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• Creamy for.  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 23:17, 15 December 2009
• For I wanted to wait until voting but I may be banned for the rest of the year so I'll cast my stones now. Aleister annoyed me into voting for him. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 09:16, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

So Syndrome, how many more votes are you going to cast on this page? ~ 11:29, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

I consider a vote on a banned sockpuppet to be a joke vote, just like a vote for rcmurphy. So, three, unless I'm allowed more. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:17, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

Now now, Syndrome, chose wisely or I'll chose for you. And you know I adore RC. ~ 23:01, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

• For Looks likely to win and he likes sheep. Good enough for me, boyo. --Sog1970 18:38, December 29, 2009 (UTC)
• For. This one holds promise. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:55, 31 December 2009

Little Mermaid (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2.5

• Nom and Half For. Splitting my vote again. Has completely rewritten Mermaids and done productive work on other articles. Also handled some drama very well (better than I did, apparently). (I'm waiting to vote until newer noobs have had a chance). WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 06:04, December 1, 2009 (UTC) Update WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:02, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Thank you! I don't know should I vote for somebody else?  Sister Little Mermaid (talk)  13:02, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

  You can vote for whomever you want. It's perfectly acceptable here to vote for yourself. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 07:39, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

1. For me! :D  Sister Little Mermaid (talk)  02:57, December 12, 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Drama. Would you like a cookie, sir? 03:40,17December,2009

Hey people! (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom. In the first day started 1 (NSFW), 2 articles and won UGotM. (I'm waiting to vote until newer noobs have had a chance). WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 06:12, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
• For Me Hey people! 18:08, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
• Against. Gay. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 18:10, December 7, 2009 (UTC) Apparently it's okay to be gay now. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 00:10, December 8, 2009 (UTC)

* Hooray For Hey people!  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 07:23, 9 December 2009

• For.. His/Her/It's Aristocrats article made me lol a lot. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! 07:29, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed sockpuppet of Little Mermaid. ~ 19:29, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

• Against. Gay. And don't anyone try to stop me now. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 19:31, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

SuperBario (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2 invalid nominations

• Nom. Wrote Star Trek: The Next Generation, has done other edits, and is thankful. (I'm waiting to vote until newer noobs have had a chance). WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 19:51, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Invalid. past the 30+3 limit. Sorry. ~ 20:11, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Really? By how much? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:50, 1 December 2009

It should be 30 plus 5. DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 00:53, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

No it shouldn't, we had that discussion ample times in the past. Not fair to real noobs. There are plenty of other awards out there. ~ 10:20, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

• Protest for. Even though SuperBario is not eligible for this award, his Matter is one of my favorite articles in quite some time, and if I were in charge, he'd be eligible to win this award. pillow talk 19:18, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
• bandwagon protest For per above. --Mn-z 04:51, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

Snowyowl (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom Obvious sockpuppet, but might be someone to look out for if he ever comes back. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 22:23, December 1, 2009 (UTC)
  • Thanks for the nom. And I'm not a sockpuppet, otherwise I would have nominated myself, surely?$s_{n}o/w(y^{o})w^{-1}$ 22:33, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
    • Unless you were a sockpuppet of Syndrome. Hmm, is that why it's obvious to Syndrome? WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 00:59, December 3, 2009 (UTC)
      • You have a very good point there. Infuriatingly, only me and Syndrome can know for sure that we're different people. Such is the plight of all who use the Internet. $s_{n}o/w(y^{o})w^{-1}$ 22:53, December 4, 2009 (UTC)
        • In that case, to insure that every user here is unique, I say that anyone who uses the Internet should not be allowed to edit this site. No wait. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 17:07, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
        • Actually, Syndrome, being a good writer, would have said, "only Syndrome and I can know for sure...". So now we all do. -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 17:48, December 7, 2009 (UTC)
        • Great. There go my chances of victory. $s_{n}o/w(y^{o})w^{-1}$ 14:38, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
        • Also, For me. I almost forgot that. $s_{n}o/w(y^{o})w^{-1}$ 11:58, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

Rcmurphy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Nom. For tradition's sake. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Wednesday, 02:49, Dec 2 2009
• For. It's tradition after all. -OptyC Sucks! CUN18:21, 2 Dec
• For. He's done some good stuff in the short time he's been here. Ph'nglui mglw'nafh Cthulhu R'lyeh wgah'nagl fhtagn! 18:24, December 2, 2009 (UTC)
• Against. Hasn't been here long enough. I might reconsider on 21 December 2012. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 17:10, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
• Against. Becoz Im a poopy. • FreddIs Great In Bedd • • • 17:56, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
• For A pretty impressive user; 842 features after 1 day at uncyc. zhel☃el 03:59 December 15
• Super Mega Fantastical For just cause. Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 04:01, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• ☃ Snowman. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:18, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

Krankshaft21 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom. Aargh it be a cold and windy night and there be nowt better to do. RaginBULLtastic Sat Dec 19th (I think) 2009 (sure about that bit)
• Verification. For those as anally-retentive as I am, the nominee created this. WHY???^{PuppyOnTheRadio} 22:10, December 21, 2009 (UTC)