Uncyclopedia:Past Winners 16
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Uncyclopedian of the Month[edit]
UotM nominations for March-April 2013[edit]
SPIKE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 0
- If Frosty and Zombiebaron have two, then SPIKE should have two (as should Puppy). And well earned for both of them (Puppy gets a spiritual nom) for this last six weeks work in the fields. I won't give him a vote template because he always deletes those.Aleister 13:17 13-2-'13
Mnbvcxz (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 5
- Nom & For To "spend so much time cleaning up Uncyclopedia and generally making it tidy" from this page's Intro exactly describes Mnbvcxz's labors this month on the Unquotable namespace. After spending a lot of time making the case that this namespace should die--after all, it began as, and still smelled like, the personal vanity project of one departed user--when opposition emerged, Mnbvcxz spent even more time going through the entire thing and making many pages of actual amusement to a reader. Determination plus adaptability defines a great collaborator. Spıke Ѧ 13:39 24-Feb-13
- For, per Spike's request. Msnbc has spent the time, the determination, and the ability to say "no" to cracking wise with the navigation tools even when he confuses unrelated things for the navigation tools. Has been around so much I think he bought the place and is giving it a new paint job. Spike points out a very good trait in a user, and a person. Yay, mnbvcxz! Aleister 21:33 24-2-'13
- Yes. --ShabiDOO 02:58, February 25, 2013 (UTC)
- For.--Funnybony 08:30, Mar 11
- For. Sir ScottPat
Dannyboy1209[edit]
Score: 1
For. I nominate Dannyboy1209 (talk) 16:00, March 28, 2013 (UTC)
Against. Sorry but this is a big step up for you. Try to write a full article first and get it featured. Sir ScottPat
Honorable mentions[edit]
- H.M. PuppyOnTheRadio With namespace issues, modernizing hacks, and repairing crap articles that I.P. Anon leaves on our doorstep.
- H.M. Aleister For nominating, voting, and categorizing; and for giving thought to these award pages when all hell was breaking loose.
As a raft of Uncyclopedians made for the lifeboat, and pushed it not over the transom but through the hull, you two have not only repaired the gaping hole but given thought to restoring meal service on the Mother Ship of amateur comedy writing. Spıke Ѧ 16:25 24-Feb-13
UotM nominations for May-July 2013[edit]
Simsilikesims (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 9
- Nom&For. Her decision to remedy the recent vandalism by manually locking down all the closed Forums is as ambitious as Mnbvcxz's recent effort to rationalize Unquotable, but more tedious and less likely to gain wide recognition. Fortunately, she has a well-endowed PC with other windows running radio, television, and role-playing games; and certainly a goblet of bon-bons nearby. Spıke Ѧ 11:54 22-May-13
- For. A definite For. A really nice and helpful user/admin. The amount of reverting she did mad the rest of our contributions to reverting look measley. A great all-round Uncyclopedian. Sir ScottPat (talk) 12:08, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Just because I like her whole bunches. Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 18:31, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
- For. If I win, do I get more bon-bons? I'm fresh out, and spent my money on kitty treats. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 00:07, May 23, 2013 (UTC)
- I shall most certainly bestow upon the winner a bucket of blessed bonbons. I shall also cast two of the winner's hated enemies into the bowels of Hell. Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 01:12, May 23, 2013 (UTC)
- For She has been helpful, and she did unban me... and pwnd many a vandal (so has SPIKE) and the most important reason is!* DungeonSiegeAddict510 has been kicked from #uncyc-votes (DSA= Denza252 = TheFakeazned525 = MangaKaDenza = DSA510) --The Slayer of Zaramoth DungeonSiegeAddict510
- For. Of course. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:35, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
- For. We seem to have a sure and worthy winner!! Aleister oo:20 4-6-'13
- For. I don't think anyone can vote against. By how much does my vote increase the probability of her winning? Anton (talk) 11:56, July 8, 2013 (UTC)
- For.--Funnybony 06:54, Aug 6
UotM Nominations for August-September[edit]
PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 5
- Nom and For Puppy has done so much for Uncyclopedia this month considering how little time he gets to edit. His contributions in formatting problems in general, formatting problems for UnSignpost and helpful contributions to forum discussions earn him this award. Sir ScottPat (talk) 14:41, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- For. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 14:45, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Definitely. Anton (talk) 18:05, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Has stayed on the site and brings with him import tech help and general advise. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:53, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
- He's a Puppy, so what's not to like? Aleister 9-9-9
Writer of the Month[edit]
WotM nominations for March-April 2013[edit]
Mnbvcxz (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 7
- He hasn't won this yet? Or has he? Msnbc's pages on pregnancy have enable us all to hide out eyes on numerous occasions, and his other articles and unnews' have inspired thousands of users. And in all seriousness, Yay! Aleister 13:07 13-2-'13
- For. UnNews remains a popular travel destination, and in the face of continuing, strategic claims on Wikipedia (wp:Talk:Uncyclopedia) that our website is "seemingly abandoned," Mnbvcxz has on some days been an important, one-man rebuttal. Spıke Ѧ 13:24 13-Feb-13
- For - Although my 'for' exists in the complete alternate universe from Spike's 'for' vote. -- 11:18, Feb. 27, 2013
- For- Do I have any other choice? No but seriously this Uncyclopedian is doing something very close to writing everytime he types something.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 17:21, March 1, 2013 (UTC)
- FOR --ShabiDOO 05:30, March 2, 2013 (UTC)
- For.--Funnybony 08:25, Mar 11
- For. Upstanding member of a great community. Detailed, intelligent comments on VFD. You have my vote. Sir ScottPat
WotM Nominations for June-July 2013[edit]
ScottPat[edit]
Score: 9
- Nom&For. The uncontested recent leader in the creation of new articles. I was enthused and relieved that his capture of the Noob award did not elicit a 20,000-word acceptance speech, though maybe it's still too early to tell. Spıke Ѧ 12:02 22-May-13
- For. I am surprised and flattered and I thank Spike for the nomination. As to the speech, I haven't quite finished as now I have to add the thanks for this nomination. Sir ScottPat (talk) 12:10, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Sometimes, corpses burp. Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 18:36, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
- For. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 00:04, May 23, 2013 (UTC)
- For.eskin. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- For, even though he does not deserve this so soon after getting Noob of the Month, which he also did not deserve and if my computer wasn't broken I would have removed my vote (I was on my way to do so when I saw he had cheated his way into winning it). And what's with this June-July thing? We should not lessen the site with things like that, imnho, and July will bring us a worthy winner (unlike June). Aleister 19:51 3-6-'13
- For. Works harder than a beaver..unless he is a beaver. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:33, June 3, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Or maybe For. Hesitating between the two. Anton (talk) 17:17, June 26, 2013 (UTC)
- For.--Funnybony 06:50, Aug 6
WotM Nominations for January-February 2014[edit]
Macboswell (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 5
- For. Macboswell has already received two featured articles and a good chance of a third one. He is already up for Noob of the Month too. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:13, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Wow, it would be cool if he wins the two awards at the same time! Anton (talk) 10:14, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- For. His sig is art itself! Sir ScottPat (converse) 10:15, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- For. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 12:39, February 24, 2014 (UTC)
- For. Well if no one else will vote for me, I might as well knight myself! SIR MAC BOSWELL [†] 09:39, March 10, 2014 (UTC)
Noob of the Whatever[edit]
NotM nominations for March-April 2013[edit]
ScottPat (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 5
- For. It seems anticlimatic nominating Brother ScottPat for the Noob award. If he stays around another week or two he'll win everything. Rookie of the Year, Journalist of the Moment, Keeper of the Flame, Raider of the Lost Ark, and the coveted 'Brother, Can You Spare A Dime' award for riding rings around the rest of us. On top of that, and in a more serious mode, he's a really good guy and a very fine writer. Aleister 8:24 12-4-'13
- For.Thank you Al for those heart-warming comments. I think I'm allowed to vote for myself. Sir ScottPat
- For. Great quality noob --User:RockoRocks/sig 13:21, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
- For. Uncyclopedia is, among other things, a social site, and competes with many sites even more firmly in the business of offering companionship. ScottPat's dominant role as a welcomer provides the touch that keeps many other users here. (Perhaps, now, a special issue of UnSignpost all about him???) Spıke Ѧ 10:07 6-May-13
- For. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 10:42, May 21, 2013 (UTC)
Dannyboy1209 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 1.5
- For.+nomination --SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 21:16, December 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Against. At least this isn't a self-nom; but I insist, nominee has not done anything outstanding except ask for various things. Many honors await you, only learn to skate and hit first. Spıke Ѧ 23:35 13-Dec-12
- Comment. Dannyboy I trust is getting the hang of this website. Just wants to run before he can jump. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:58, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
- For. I vote me, as I am very new indeed Dannyboy1209 (talk) 21:27, December 18, 2012 (UTC)
- For. five points —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 92.0.102.253 (talk • contribs)
- Comment Nice seeming guy whose written a couple paragraphs and chats on peoples talk pages. Once he writes some promising material or does a bit of actual site maintenance or such, I'll happily vote for him. --ShabiDOO 07:27, January 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Against.Sorry Dannyboy but I've done more articles as a noob than you and I haven't got voted. Sir ScottPat
- Against. He makes a chance ... but just not enough. --User:RockoRocks/sig 13:21, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. -I find it a bit of a shame that so many people chose to vote against. You don't think he's worthy, fine, don't vote (or vote for the other guy) but there is no need to discourage a new editor. ~ 13:42, May 6, 2013 (UTC)
NotM nominations for June-July 2013[edit]
Anton199 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 6
- Nom and For Anton strives for quality over quantity and this really shows in his editing. His articles and edits are hilarious, he has a warm, friendly personality, he contributes to VFH and VFD regularly and has done some of the best pee reviews I have ever seen. Sir ScottPat (talk) 06:39, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
- For. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 07:12, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
- I can't decide between Anton and Moogle either. Am not voting at all to give even newer noobs the impression they could leapfrog these two, and because the whole awards scene is a distraction. It is heartening that Anton has found a web-home here, and amazing how well he does in a language that is not Russian. (My designation of this "Moment" as "June-July" is my guess as to the current pace of things, as I delegated the awarding of the last round and it never happened. A joint award this time is not out of the question.) Spıke Ѧ 12:13 22-May-13
- For. There are several reasons for my vote, all of which are somewhat esoteric and based on Jung's concept of synchronicity. Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 12:50, May 29, 2013 (UTC)
- For. I want to meet the other 198 of them. Aleister 13:45 5-6-'13
- For. Certainly not much to decide between them at all, but anyone willing to give their vote to the other side deserves mine! Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 13:21, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Why is it suddenly my fault he doesn't understand how competition works? --TheDarthMoogle (talk) 14:36, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Why is it suddenly my fault that I just voted for him? Anton (talk) 15:05, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
- DarthMoogle, it most certainly isn't your fault. You're acting within the rules. However, it is to Anton's credit that he voted for you. I'm pretty sure from his voting comment he knew he could vote for himself, but chose not to. I think Anton's edits so far make him deserving of the award, and find it commendable that he has voted for his competitor. Thus, I have voted for him. I think such a rationale is perfectly reasonable, but, should you disagree, you are most welcome to explain why on my talk-page. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 18:04, June 6, 2013 (UTC)
- For As another noob wanting to get this award, this may seem counterintuitive. However, I believe in good sportsmanship. Anton here has been around since... sometime, and when he joined, he has been a great contributer to the site. If there is anyone more deserving of this
humiliatingglorious award, it is our colleague, Anton! --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 06:34, June 12, 2013 (UTC)
TheDarthMoogle (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 5
- Nom and For DarthMoogle has written excellent articles and has contributed to VFH and VFD. He has written very helpful comments to people on talk pages/VFH and even helped me on an article when I didn't even ask him. This shows that he has a kind personality and can go far. (I can't choose between the two). Sir ScottPat (talk) 06:53, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
- For. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 07:12, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
- See above under Anton. We would all know TheDarthMoogle a little better if he did not do so much of his howling-at-the-moon and asking of rhetorical questions at Uncyclopedia:Sandbox, where it faces quick erasure; but he is a welcome addition to the group. Spıke Ѧ 12:13 22-May-13
- Apparently, I can vote for myself, but that's just silly. --TheDarthMoogle (talk) 16:01, May 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Apparently I can also vote for myself. But as it is just silly, I will vote for Darth Moogle. For. Anton (talk) 19:05, May 27, 2013 (UTC)
- For. A man, a plan, a canal, Darth Moogle! Aleister 13:46 5-6-'13
- For. because Moogles are awesome. And so is the game. And indeed has done great contribs. 11:05, 9 June, 2013 (UTC)
NotM nominations for August-September 2013[edit]
Jaygo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 3
- Jaygo began his contributions by rewriting "Feminism" and "Sexism" and soon after created "Scientology". He is a very good writer, lawyer
and scientologist. Anton (talk) 15:31, August 11, 2013 (UTC) - For. Great noob! Sir ScottPat (talk) 18:42, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
- (edit conflict with Mr. ScottPat) Jaygo deserves this Plaque of Gold for Scientology alone. As an admirer of L. Ron Hubbard's work, both in writing and in initially setting up a weird organization, I must say that this article actually gives some good data now and then. I'm not a scientologist, although I play one on TV (and in the scientology marketing films as Tom Cruise's stand-in), and don't approve of many of their practices towards new people, and am wondering why this page isn't yet a feature. Yay Jaygo! Aleister 18:47 8-9-'13
Newman66 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 5 or 6
- Since the beginning, Newman has been acting as an admin (in a good way) and helped us a lot by contributing to VFD and QVFD. He also patrols the site and creates nice articles with rather extraordinary names. Anton (talk) 15:31, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- This guy gonna go far. Sir ScottPat (talk) 15:37, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- For.. Outstanding new contributor. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 06:51, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
- For.. I'm a user who is a few months older here as a user than Jaygo, and I believe I deserve to be a nominated user here. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 16:23, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Although I haven't had the pleasure of meeting Newman (just as Elaine seldom met him during his Seinfeld incarnation), I've seen his name go by many a time in my limited time here. Yay Newman! Aleister 18:51 9-8-'13
- For. Deserves it. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:14, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
NotM nominations for November-December 2013[edit]
Chunkles[edit]
Score: 6
- Nom & For Has been here for just a week and already had his article feautured on the Main Page. Let's hope there's more of the same coming up! --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:17, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
- For. He has broken the mold, but managed to fix it up afterwards. • Puppy's talk page • 07:57 pm 19 Nov 2013
- I want to have his babies. --ShabiDOO 02:36, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
- For.-- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:14, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
- For. ScottPat, no one's last chapter has been written. Bring on the hardware! Spıke Ѧ 12:09 22-Nov-13
- For. a feature already and well earned. it took me four months to get my first feature and I'm still trying for my second. Aleister 13:29 22/11/13
- For. Because I can vote for myself, yay! (I didn't even know I was nominated until I logged on just today, lol.) Chunkles (talk) 02:46, December 10, 2013 (UTC)
Writer of the Year[edit]
ScottPat (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 4
- For - ScottPat came on board and helped to keep the ship afloat by his excellent writing, his well researched pages, his guidance, assistance, and loyalty to his friends, and may have won the uncoveted Fake Pegasus Award for most features if he hadn't wasted over three months by not being here at the start of the year. With 13 features and many many more pages which should and will be featured, ScottPat has lent his talent to a place that could easily have imploded without him and a few others. But he still hasn't earned the Noob of the Month award, imnho, and must keep trying hard to earn that honor. Aleister 17:45 3-1-14
- Erection He's been here for less than a year and already had 17 featured articles. 'Nuff said. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 20:23, January 21, 2014 (UTC)
- For ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:23, January 22, 2014 (UTC)
- For ScottPat has been here less than a year but I have no hesitation in voting this honour. Open to other writer's suggestions and keen on collaborations, the ideal Uncyclopedian. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:42, January 30, 2014 (UTC)
Funnybony (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 1
- Nom & For With a dozen or so features and over 40 unnews stories (all of great quality) I think Funnybony is the obvious candidate. He's a writing factory...always relevant and upto date, extremely careful in his grammar and construction of his sentences, the meaning of the jokes and references are clear and helarious. His articles always have a very high laugh to word count ratio. The quiet writer of uncyclopedia. --ShabiDOO 15:00, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
SPIKE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 2
- Nom and For He produces top quality articles every single time and produces a large quantity of them. His writing style is very good and he gets a lot of featured articles. Also his writing skills and experience at writing have allowed him to touch up countless other articles people write to make them comprehensible. Always trying to save articles of VFD with re-writes that get featured. Sir ScottPat (talk) 08:26, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
- For.--Funnybony 22:00, Jan 4
- My second choice, since Funnybony won this last year. On SPIKE's behalf I'll mention that he won the uncoveted "Fake Pegasus Award" for having the most features in 2013 (15), winning it for the second year in a row. WOTY would be a very reasonable vote here. Aleister 15:43 5-1-14
Mhaille (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 1
- Nom & for. Forever and always. He may not have done much in the way of, y'know, anything this year, but he remains the best contributor never to have won this by a mile, and his absence from the list of winners is nothing short of a travesty. --UU - natter 18:22, Jan 16
Uncyclopedian of the Year[edit]
- I think you can only vote once regards these noms. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:08, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
- Scrub that. You can. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:15, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
SPIKE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 4
- For - SPIKE is our mischief maker, our gruff asshole, our demonized demon, and this site's Savior during the past year. He's practically lived here to defeat vandals, to guide old and new writers into good writing habits, and has taken his share of deserved and undeserved truths and slanders. Better yet, he has stayed true-to-form all during that and plowed ahead with a day-by-day and hour-by-hour determination that is noteworthy and commendable. There is much more to say, but if this post gets too long he will delete it and ban me. Aleister 17:37 3-1-14
- For. As much as I respect what Romartus' and let's not forget Simsie's amazing contributions have been this year at keeping the ship running, the man who has really brought this ship out of the Bermuda Triangle (if that's even an expression) is Spike. I am sure that this site's community would not exist here if it hadn't been for this man. Sir ScottPat (talk) 17:50, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Spike was the first person whom I met here and I am glad that it was so, because his clever comments and suggestions (most of which I still remember) as well as thorough reviews of my work have been of a great help to me and - I am sure - to many other users! Anton (talk) 17:56, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Ultra huge boner --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 16:50, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
Romartus (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 2
- The guy does a lot behind the scenes you barely notice it but it's good work and keeps the site strong and solid. He flew to California to visit with the wikia people and has great relations with them. He's been great at calming things down, never says no to a request and his nipples are just the sexiest thing I've seen since pickled peanut butter! An unsung hero of uncyclopedia. --ShabiDOO 14:46, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
- And he is a great writer! Anton (talk) 17:43, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 2
- Nom and For Pretty sure I remember promising Puppy he'd win this. He has give the technical support whenever we've needed it. Even when he is bogged down by his job. He recreated UnSignpost's formatting, re-formatted VFD and helped display the spoof Government shut down warning among some of his great achievements. Sir ScottPat (talk) 17:57, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
- For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:39, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
Roman Dog Bird (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 1
- This guy is just so cool and funny. Oh my god, he's made me laugh so much over the years. I miss him so much. Truly the greatest Uncyclopedian. --Lee Harvey Osmond (talk) 18:31, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment.I believe you two are related, identical twins indeed. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:53, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
Simsilikesims (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )[edit]
Score: 4
- Perhaps I am biased but Sims happens to be the only Uncyclopedian (besides Sannse) that I have met in person. Level headed and always brings a cool head to discussions. An absolute asset to this website and a very nice person too. Remember to like cats! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:58, January 3, 2014 (UTC)
- In fact...everything I said about Romartus also applies to SIMS...only she has super mega stealth ninja qualities. --ShabiDOO 08:33, January 4, 2014 (UTC)
- For.--Funnybony 22:07, Jan 4
- For. I am, as has been noted, rarely here. But when I am, I approve of Simsi's contributions. --UU - natter 18:17, Jan 16