Uncyclopedia:Accuracy
![]() The author(s) must promptly be executed.[Of course not!] Uncyclopedia contains no inaccuracies.[Of course not!]
This template may also be inaccurate.[Of course not!] |

Uncyclopedia is the truth[2]. Therefore, everything in Uncyclopedia is true[I Don't Believe This]. If something in Uncyclopedia is not true[I Don't Believe This], then it must be corrected so that it is true[I Don't Believe This]. However, this will never be necessary because everything in Uncyclopedia is true[I Don't Believe This]. [The Cake is a Lie.][I Don't Believe This]
The Golden Age of Information: Pax Uncyclopædia[I Don't Believe This]
“It makes me want to scream, shout, celebrate, cry and laugh, to know that I live in the Age of Uncyclopedia, the most glorious period of human history, in which all is illuminated.”
We live in the Pax Uncyclopædia[I Don't Believe This]: Uncyclopedia is filled with informative content of indubitable veracity[I Don't Believe This]. This unmatched accuracy was a product of a most ingenious technique[I Don't Believe This]. The Founding Fathers of Uncyclopedia foresaw that people would despise authority--that they will do whatever they were told not to do.[I Don't Believe This] So, the Founders, in their infinite wisdom, used reverse psychology.[3] They asked for the world to write nonsense or humor and received Pure Knowledge instead.[Original Bullshit]
Repentance of Heretics[I Don't Believe This]

Some have questioned the factual accuracy of Uncyclopedia.[I Don't Believe This] In September 2000, they were invited to a friendly debate with the Lord High Inquisitor in the Palace of Knowledge[I Don't Believe This], a medieval torture chamber purchased by the Uncyclomedia Foundation and converted into a luxurious dining hall, complete with amenities such as warmed chairs and electrical stimulation devices for the resuscitation of those who have fainted (physically or metaphorically)[I Don't Believe This]. After several days, during which screams of joy (at realizing the truth) were heard from the Palace, the truth-deniers repented[4].
Scientific Research[Original Bullshit]
Many studies have been done to prove the accuracy of Uncyclopedia[I Don't Believe This]. According to the prestigious pee-reviewed journal Phallological Transactions of the Society for Marine Astronomy, Uncyclopedia contains up to 23.8% fewer errors than the Iraqi Ministry of Information[5] The Uncyclomedia Foundation also performed its own objective study, which found that 103.8532%[I Don't Believe This] of the information in Uncyclopedia was "250% true." [6]
Cite Your Sources or Die[I Don't Believe This]

To ensure superior credibility[I Don't Believe This], (if you can be bothered to do so) all sources must be cited[I Don't Believe This]. (Write {{cn}} at the end of every sentence that doesn't have a citation[I Don't Believe This]; It will show that what was being said is really a big fat greek lie[I Don't Believe This].[big fat greek lie]) All articles that do not have proper citations will be instantly deleted[Original Bullshit] and its authors will be devoured by those scary rainbow things that I keep on seeing everywhere.[I Don't Believe This][7]
You must use MLA format for some citations[Original Bullshit]. Unfortunately, for some mysterious reason that we cannot even begin to understand, the Modern Language Association has failed to create a format for some obviously reliable sources[I Don't Believe This]. For those, use these Uncyclopedia guidelines[guidelines needed].
Controlled Substances[I Don't Believe This]
- Hallucinogens should be cited with the following format:
- Name of Drug(s). Dose. Last Name of Drug Dealer, First Name of Drug Dealer. City Taken In, Year.
- LSD. 200 µg. Guy, Some. Los Angeles, 2002.
- Non-hallucinogenic[I Don't Believe This] drugs[I Don't Believe This] are[I Don't Believe This] not[I Don't Believe This] considered[I Don't Believe This] as [I Don't Believe This]accurate[I Don't Believe This] as hallucinogenic drugs[...more nee..]. However, you may cite them with the same format as hallucinogens provided that you take a very large dose[...Flying hello ok...]. To figure out what that dose would be, take hallucinogens and ask whomever you meet during your trip[....what...am...I...here].
Electronic Sources
- SPAM emails:
- Last Name of Sender, First Name of Sender. "Title of Email." Email Address of Sender. Date Received.
- Wilde, Oscar. "I am the truth"[I Don't Believe This] minluv@newspeak.oca 25 December 2005.
Interesting People Whom You Meet
For the protection of the privacy of the valuable experts who serve the greater good of our society, Uncyclopedia does not require that you provide the name of your sources[Original Bullshit]. You can just give a description of them[I think he had two arms and a nose].
- One Person:
- Description of Person. Year.
- That Guy Who Was Passed Out and Smelled of Vodka. 1998.
- That Person the Martians Want to Get. 2002.
- One person being channeled through another person through the nether realm or the Netherlands or whatever...:
- Last Name of Channeler, First Name. Name of Person Channeled. Means of Channeling. Year.
- Frenya, Skeezo. Chief Jaguar-on-Crack of the Ancient Toltecs. Yahoo Messenger (Occult Edition). 1998.
When Should I Cite Sources?
A good rule of thumb to follow is to always cite sources when you have a sentence with the letter "e" in it[Original Bullshit][8]. This rule will always work, unless you have a sentence without the letter "e."[I Don't Believe This] If that happens, just cite the source[I Don't Believe This].
For example, let's say that you were adding content to the article You:
"You have a small penis [1].[I Don't Believe This] 'You' has 3 letters [2].[I Don't Believe This] An ant is absurd [3].[I Don't Believe This] The last sentence did not have an 'e' in it [I Don't Believe This].
References
- [1] Spears, Britney. "EW! YOUR PENIS IS TOO SMALL-TRY OUR PENIS ENLARGEMENT PILLS." [I Don't Believe This]Spamalot@fakedomain.tk. 25 December 2005.
- [2]'you' The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. p. 205.[I Don't Believe This]
- [3] Anonymous. The Anti-Insect Manifesto. London: Elite Press, 1337.[I Don't Believe This]

Miscellaneous Sources
- Demonic Possession:
- Name or Description of Demon. Date of Possession.
- Ethereal Dinosaur with Multiple Horns. 5 May 1999.
- Them. We at Uncyclopedia understand what you mean by Them[I Don't Believe This]. We hear their howls too [I Don't Believe This]. Just use this format:
- Them. Date.
- Animals. Only fools don't realize that they can talk.
- Species of Animal. 'Title of Communication.' Date.
- Loch Ness Monster. 'Beware of geese.' 1873.
- The Voices in Your Head can make valuable contributions to our encyclopedia[9]
- The Voices in My Head. Location. Date.
Higher Standards
The [I Don't Believe This] next[I Don't Believe This] goal[I Don't Believe This] for[I Don't Believe This] Uncyclopedia[I Don't Believe This] is[I Don't Believe This] to [I Don't Believe This]attain[I Don't Believe This] 800% truth [I Don't Believe This]-1200% fiction[Original Bullshit]. In order to achieve this goal by 2010,[I Don't Believe This] every[I Don't Believe This][10] word[I Don't Believe This][11] in[12] Uncyclopedia[I Don't Believe This][I Don't Believe This][I Don't Believe This][I Don't Believe This][I Don't Believe This] should[13] be[14] cited[15]. By 2013, e[16]v[17]e[18]r[19]y[20] l[21]e[22]t[23]t[24]e[25]r[26] w[27]i[28]l[29]l[30] b[31]e[32] c[33]i[34]t[35]e[36]d[37][38]. This[I Don't Believe This] will[I Don't Believe This] help[I Don't Believe This] us[I Don't Believe This] achieve [I Don't Believe This]2600% accuracy [I Don't Believe This].
References[I Don't Believe This][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit][Original Bullshit]
- ↑ Al-Sahhaf, M. S. et al. (2007). Comparative analysis of accuracy and error correction in reference materials. Phallollogical Transactions of the Society for Marine Astronomy. 2(34): 897-923.
- ↑ "Uncyclopedia:Accuracy." {No it's not}Uncyclopedia, the Content-Free Encyclopedia. Candyland: Uncyclomedia Foundation, 2007. 2 January, 2007. <http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Uncyclopedia:Accuracy>.[look it up yourself]
- ↑ Conversation with my friend who thinks that straightjackets are fashionable. 1996.
- ↑ "Conference on Accuracy with Inquisition Yields Surprising Results" (2006). Unnews.
- ↑ Baghdad, Bob (5 June 2001). "Statistical Analysis of Uncyclopedic Accuracy." Phallological Transactions of the Society for Marine Astronomy. Oxford: Oxford Dairy Farms Press, 1999.
- ↑ "Official Report." Uncyclopedic Committee on Factual Accuracy. Candyland: Uncyclomedia Foundation, 2000.
- ↑ Shrooms (Psilocybin). 40 g. Homie, My. New York, 2006.
- ↑ "Official Manual on Style." Uncyclopedic Committee on Factual Accuracy. Candyland: Uncyclomedia Foundation, 2000.
- ↑ The Voices in My Head. A Portable Toilet. 1992.
- ↑ "every." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. p. 205
- ↑ "word." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. p. 1112
- ↑ "in." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. p. 452
- ↑ "should." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. p. 812
- ↑ "be." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. p. 210
- ↑ "cite." The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition. Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004. p. 303
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.[look it up yourself]
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ Dover, Ben. The Alphabet Book. New York: Idiot's Children Press, 2000.
- ↑ "Yet Another Official Report".[look it up yourself] Uncyclopedic Committee on Factual Accuracy. Candyland: Uncyclomedia Foundation, 2000.
![]() This article was nominated to become a featured article[I Don't Believe This]; however, due to a voting discrepancy in Florida[citation needed [citation needed]] involving Oprah[I Don't Believe This] and a killer pudding[Citation not needed at all; thank you very much], it didn't make the cut (12/20)[I Don't Believe This]. It's the thought that counts, right?[I Don't Believe This] You can prevent Oprah's nefarious plans from working by voting for other articles at Uncyclopedia:VFH[I Don't Believe This].
|