Uncyclopedia talk:Accuracy
I have a suggestion. Instead of there just being {{cn}} tags, there should be some alternatives, i.e. {{cn1}}, {{cn2}}, exc., that result in similar phrases ([Lie], [untruth], [I don't agree], [exc.]) when placed. --[citations needed] 02:03, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Too Random. Lets try something different.--Scott 05:30, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
- I changed this a little so that template:cn[citation needed] will be used for the standard citation needed message template:cn2[this is a lie] will be for a random citation and template:cn3[template cn needed]} will be for a custom one.--Scott 05:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
Was going to nominate this for highlite[citation needed], but it's quasi-featured allready[1], so no need to do it[or is there?]. Guutog 18:40, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[WTFLOLBBQ]
Misaligned Categories[edit]
Just to let someone know, the faked category box at the bottom of the page ends up out of place and looking a bit strange in Opera 9.25, although it looks fine in Internet Explorer. I'm not much more than a newb at editing articles and wikicode, so have no idea how to fix it - this is just me bringing the minor bug to general attention Cheese 20:22, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Peelz!![edit]
It's 2010 allready! :O --88.91.63.1 20:29, January 13, 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs fixin', please feel obligated to make whatever changes you feel are needed, (even though they'll probably be reverted 5 seconds later). Uncyclopedia is a wiki, so almost anyone can edit almost any article by almost simply following the edit link almost at the top. You don't even need to log in in most cases! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Uncyclopedia Cabal encourages you to be italic. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly, and your 6 month ban will fly by faster than you think. If you're not sure how editing works, check out proper wiki formatting, or use the sandbox to try out your vandalizing skills. DJ Mixerr 22:01, December 28, 2010 (UTC)
(talk)(contributions)
You people here suck[edit]
After reading many things in this worthless site, and really? This is just stupid and ridiculous(and yes, even the average person would say that), all you actually do is push the stereotype of you people being idiots further until you finally reach the point that you see the real truth. THAT YOU ARE STUPID AND NOT FUNNY. I'll be on a rampage trying to correct every single topic in here, totally starting a rebellion in the meaning of UNcyclopedia. (I am serious, and if a stupid person tries to make me cite, never) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jssdkgsl,sdgg (talk • contribs)
- Dude, calm down. That's the point![citation needed]—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 99.224.26.130 (talk • contribs)