Uncyclopedia:VFH/archive8

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFH.

New Hampshire Merchant Cat

Score: +16 racist litter boxes

Featured —rc (t) 09:07, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Self-nom and For. I've liked this for a long time, and no one on Pee Review seemed to hate it, so, um, there's a peek into my subconscious.--Procopius 16:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For --—Braydie 16:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 17:30, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For So randomly funny --Gaberou 22:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For cat satire. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For pretty kitty cats! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:57, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 01:16, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
For. I read this back when it was first written and thought it was highly excellent. --Anyone 18:47, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Just to see it on the front page. --gosh zillacorrespondence 00:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For Seems to be a trend for me to end up being the 10th.. ♥ for this article. --♥ Lacey • clicky 00:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
foR It's quite good, and consistent--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For As good as I expected it to be. Procopius should be paid for his writing. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:08, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
For A lot of work went into this one. --Jedravent 19:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
For Because it's clearly going over tonight anyway... Berogen^VFH 20:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
For because I hate darkies.—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 13:15, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
For. I just read this for the first time, and regretted not having read it earlier.--<<>> 13:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

UnNews:TIME magazine names "Person of the Year": Not You

Score: +17 failures

Featured —rc (t) 08:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

Nom and For. Laughed when I read it, and having it featured now would be quite TIMEly. ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 04:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For Once in a while, we need to make fun of ourselves to break up the monotony of making fun of other things not relating to us. --General Insineratehymn 04:39, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For *sniff* --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:46, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
ForProlix 05:03, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

*Against It shoulda been "Everyone Time magazine's Person of the Year Except You" haven't you people ever heard of misdirection? --Super 90 07:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

New title is much better. I withdraw my "against" vote. --Super 90 22:04, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

For Because "You" is about the most bullshit, self-congratulatory handjob of a magazine cover ever. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Oh this is brilliant, and a great twist on the stupid TIME publicity stunt. I wish we could feature this TODAY.--<<>> 16:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Feature IMMEDIATELY! gosh zillacorrespondence 17:17, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For, 17:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For. It's short, but good. - Lemon. 19:44, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For!*--Enigma16 20:59, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For! Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 21:21, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak for, conditional full for - I like it, but this article is begging for some {{USERNAME|You}}. I know people object to its overusage, but this article suits it perfectly. If only we could get {{If}} to handle whether or not one is logged in, so that the word 'are' could be changed to 'is' for the sake of grammatical correctness depending on whether you're an IP seeing 'You are' or a user seeing '<insert name here> is'. --User:Nintendorulez 21:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For Nothing wrong with tooting your own horn. Stan Lather 01:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
For Super. - Zaui ⌘ TALK MUN ╬ - 18:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
For <insert name here>'s a jolly good fellow... Berogen^VFH 20:41, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! --<insert name here> 10:34, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

No, thank you! - The Real ndansmith.

For despite overuse of the aforementioned template. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 21:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
For... but is my novel really that bad? :( —Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 10:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
For... and my novel is much worse than yours! so there -- sannse<staff/> (talk) 11:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
For --—Braydie 17:40, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Patrick Henry

Score: +16

Featured —rc (t) 07:21, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

N+F I was clicking random page when I found this gem. I couldn't believe it wasn't featured. --Jedravent 00:42, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Holy Fucking For This is brilliant beyond measure, I say. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:49, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
For Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 05:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
For, why wasn't history class like this?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:05, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Ipso Facto Feckin Lutely --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 06:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Oh yes. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 17:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 22:20, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Rofl- One-eyed Jack strike gold again.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:14, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Absolutely. Swordmaster 18:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Pass Analyse that! -- di Mario 18:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
For What a delightful little article. I said that myself. --General Insineratehymn 21:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
For That was very amusing. --J. Fuckin Kyle 16:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For. gosh zillacorrespondence 17:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For Now go ~~write~~ pour a Sam Adams Berogen^VFH 20:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Holy crap this is hilarious. Who wrote this genius... ness... ? User:Wehpudicabok/sig 21:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
For God's sake, get this featured! --Ano ther 05:31, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Holocaust Tycoon

Score: +16 million successful exterminations

Featured —rc (t) 08:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Nominate, Very Strong For; Why hasn't this been nominated yet? You guys are slipping. Nonymous 06:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For Alksub 06:32, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For in all its, uh, glory - David Gerard 08:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For I thought it was a featured article. Prolix 09:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Here's why you thought it was: Babel:Hi. They used to do these things called "reskins", you see. Jedravent 21:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Against this kind of humor on the frontpage.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 10:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Oh, that Mhaille! Where will his appaullingly racist racism take us next? We all know where it's taking him though! --Anyone 17:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For Genius. Blue Fang should definitely buy this copywright. --FoxyBabe 19:28, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Oh-My-Fucking-YHVH, this is what I call devious. \m/ herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 19:33, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
FOR Incredibly wrong depraved you-don't-want-to-laugh-but-you-can't-physically-stop-yourself humour that just has to go on the front page. Though where the Iranian nutcase claiming it never got released? --Billsheppard 19:54, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For Dead Souls. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Against. I understand that it's satirizing white supremacist video games, but I'm deepy uncomfortable with referring to Holocaust victims as game pieces, even as satire. I suspect featuring the article will cause more trouble than it's worth.--Procopius 01:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Against. It lacks that special something that makes an equally discomfort inducing satire like Jingo, well, brilliant.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Against. Good concept, but didn't make me laugh much and made me feel yucky when i did. Phal112 08:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
For. It's mentionable as wonderful. ♥. How I love those tycoon games :] I'm a sick fuck. I like to make them have sex and eat the dog. -- ♥ Lacey • clicky 09:52, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. It's hilarious at the beginning but starts losing its momentum at the Units section... --Zig 13:34, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
For.....kudos to Brad for the original idea. -- Tits McGee 13:48, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Comment. In my defense, it was part of a comment on how tasteless an article for VFH was, "This is the most tasteless idea since Holocaust Tycoon (video game)." It was Mhaille's dedication and hard work that brought this beauty to life.--<<

>> 19:41, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

For cause Mhaille is one funny goy. --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 13:07, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 21:46, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
God help me, but this is definitely a for. --UtarEmpire 05:12, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For. It shuoldn't be funny, but it is. --{{User:Stevo the human/sig}} 10:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Against. While it is well written, there are limits to satire. Even in Uncync. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 13:25, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Against-It's well done mind you, but I don't find it very entertaining when I feel terrible after laughing at something.--Ganall 23:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For <insert something incredibly offensive here. No, not there. Here.> -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Why not. Tomtyke 07:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Why haven't I voted for this yet? » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 21:36, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Aggin-it I know, call me a sissy, but I have difficulties with this being featured. - Lemon. 21:50, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
'For per Dawg. And I'm Jewish. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:32, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
FOR Through and through, this is brilliant. If satire had its limits, this has just set a new limit :p --Rodrigo! 06:15, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Against. Everyone has a few things in her or his mind-set that others are not allowed to make jokes about, and for me the Holocaust is one of them. If you feel the need to respond to this statement, please do so on my home page. -- di Mario 17:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, it's the hairdo with me - you don't talk about it, you don't laugh at it, understand? For. 20:47, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Strong Against-It's too offensive for me to laugh sorry.--Lt. Wyoming 23:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Sure, I wouldn't have come and voted but for the forum thread, but I read this and found it great. Personally I don't find reminders of just how horrible humans can be to be offensive.---Rev. Isra (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Strongest Possible For. That'll show you holocaust deniers! Racist humour is always funny, as long as it's clearly harmless, which this is. It's not like Nazis and Daily Mail readers (or is that the same thing?) write the humour in this place. This is definitely worthy of a feature. --MrMetalFLower 20:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Against, not because I think it's offensive (which is something I couldn't really comment on) but because if you're going to feature something based around so macabre a subject it's got to be seriously funny in order to overcome the inherent difficulties, and I don't think this quite makes it. --Sir Jam 20:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
For. --User:The Bard/sig 20:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
For, because I, myself, had an idea for this sort of play on "Rollercoaster Tycoon." A much better job was done than that which I would have in making it into an article. --Forgottenpassword 22:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Very strong against 6 million deaths is NOT something you should make a joke out of. --GAMESPOT=666 05:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Completely Against : I agree with the above comment. Being Israeli, I really don't think the Holocaust should be taken in such a joking way, even on Uncylopedia. There's a very wide line between humor and offensive material, but this article has still managed to cross it... --The Llama Llo ver !!! 06:31, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For /me braces himself to get beaten up outside the club when he leaves tonight. --—Braydie 13:42, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Shame on me. gosh zillacorrespondence 17:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
~~Completely against- Yes, it's funny, but I agree with Braydei. was too tragic to provide humour and is offensive —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nachoman123 (talk • contribs)~~ No voting for featured pages, silly bunny.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:04, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

The Free World

Score: +16

Featured —rc (t) 05:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Renom and for, because this article rules. And, it still has the thing about the cars that I came up with. :) -- Hindleyite Converse 13:30, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For This is close to the best article currently listed on VFH. Feature it! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:48, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 19:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
4. Feature it! --L 05:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Now, this is more like it.--Winston 12:03, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
For. I could of swore I voted for these articles before... --Anyone 18:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
For. The money section is brilliant.--Procopius 00:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For, though 001 is better. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
$For --Alksub 06:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For. I've voted for this before, haven't I? --gosh zillacorrespondence 00:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For. --So So 00:02, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Me me me. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 09:02, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
For. I especially liked the episode where Lucy pretends to be a cleaning lady at mr Moonies office but then is mistaken for a lady of the night on her way home. -- di Mario 16:52, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
For. This is neat stuff --Rodrigo! 18:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
For --—Braydie 19:59, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Prog Rock

Score: +16 hour keyboard solo

Featured —rc (t) 07:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Nom and Strong For; Hilarious. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:42, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For Although, I think it should also contain a section on prog metal as well. --General Insineratehymn 11:01, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For. The tabulature alone is a joy. Lemon. 01:36, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
For my favourite music genre. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
For, if only for the tabbing. -- Hindleyite Converse 19:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Strong for. The musical notation made me laugh out loud.--Procopius 00:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Pro. herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 01:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Against. I think it gets a little sketchy in the middle. Alksub 06:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 08:26, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For --—Braydie 19:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For - Prog rules! The article makes me laugh for 28 minutes non-stop while listening to Close to the Edge. It's gne om I 11:05, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak For. -- eh.. :/ ♥ Lacey • clicky 11:07, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
For....long winded and whithering. -- Tits McGee 13:58, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
For it is so realistic --Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH 21:43, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 21:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For Well, what can I say, it made me laugh. --FoxyBabe 19:43, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Abstain! The article is funny, I grant you that, but it makes fun of the Pink Floyd fer chrissake! And of Genesis! -- di Mario 16:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
For - yeah... -- sannse<staff/> (talk) 20:44, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Super-Strong For Absolutely hilarious. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 06:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

The Annual One-Day-Only Winter Holidays Earlybird 5:00 AM 99% Off Sale

Score: +17 rushed parents looking desperately for a Wii the day before Christmas

Featured —rc (t) 05:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Self Nom and For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:37, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For. I'm already waiting in line for the sale. Can somebody bring me pizza and a blanket? --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Had lots of meat, I like. ♥ Lacey • clicky 06:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Bah, a million alone for North America and I still can't find one. Probably because I didn't camp out,--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:14, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Santa compelles me to buy it. --{{User:Stevo the human/sig}} 11:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For - Will try this on the 24th. If it's not working... grrr... - It's gne om I 04:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 21:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For. --gosh zillacorrespondence 01:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For Godless consumerism. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For Vote whore. -- Codestream 02:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
ForNo reason at all, I have no idea what this is! XD I feel like Im high, amnj! Did someone eat my bagels??? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jone Xiao (talk • contribs) diff
For CiaranP 02:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 16:09, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For. "Squiggle specializes in articles with extremely long titles." t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:07, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
For /me agrees with Tompkins --—Braydie 00:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 16:32, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
For I chuckled. A plus in my book.--The One and Only Czar Yah 01:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

UnBooks:Pulp Novel, the case of the dashing dame

Score: +17 private eyes who think this comedic reductio ad absurdum on the genre of crime-soaked, cheesy metaphor-drenched pulp fiction is easy on the eyes. Easy on the eyes like that bombshell blonde in the red dress who walked in like she owned the place. You could hear the silence as every head in the bar turned, just for a chance to watch her walk by and smell her perfume. She smelled like heartache and roses. Roses got thorns, see? And this gal had thorns in spades.

SN+F This is a nom, a self-nom, see? That's how we do it in the big, cruel city. We nom at night. Night is dark, and black like her heart. A dark night sky watched over by the sad, dark eye of the moon, staring. Staring down at a city crisscrossed with crummy streets full of dirty secrets that drain away into the filthy gutters of men's souls. Which also have secrets. A sad moon because it knows your dark secret. Secret like you not telling your girl that you cry yourself to sleep sometimes. How do I know that? 'Cause I'm a detective, see? A private dick, a gumshoe. No time for niceties; when there's a gun to my head, I roll the dice, put all my cards on the table and shoot from the hip until the fat lady sings. I know you like I know this city, and I know this city like the back of my hand. Sure, a map would work better. Maybe then I'd stop driving into the river. But that's not how we do it in the private eye game. We don't have time for maps. Too busy solving crime. (donations, expired medicine, letters of support and votes can be sent to Modusoperandi c.o. Bellevue Hospital for the Criminally Longwinded) Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 15:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
FOR, already! - Jesus Horatio Christ, anything to shut you up! :) Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 15:27, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For Absolutely hilarious. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 16:42, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 18:00, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For, eh? --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 18:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 21:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
The vote's for, see? A vote like the ones that got the crooked mayor back into office. --Alksub 22:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For, and could you please make a noir-style film of this using the YouTube feature? Thanks. ;)--<<>> 00:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Comment I did, but they deleted it because you can see my bum.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Strong For, and agree with Brad. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
4. --L 01:51, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For. --♥ Lacey • clicky 06:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For Nearly every UnBook is good, and this is no exeption.--Imp88 12:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Fore! Never before have I actually used the little attention span that I have to pay attention to something for so long. I actually read the entire th- A rotary phone!? Neat! --The Cyber Mage 02:00, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For - I just read it and I can't believe I'm laughing`until now. It's gne om I 07:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
I made my vote 'For'. For, like an analogy placed against something else that's analogous to it. Something which, when the analogy is read, provides clarity to the first thing I was trying to describe. "Like a brick" says the reader, and smiles. Then the smile goes away. The smile turns to a grimace. A grimace of anger. Because "I made my vote for like a brick" doesn't make any sense. And I'm left out in the cold city, just another shlub with another vote, and a bottle of burboun, which my doctor says I shouldn't touch since the last visit to the hospital. So I don't. I'm getting soft like that. Everything's gone to shit since I started voting. Lemon. 22:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
For ~Sir Rangeley GUN WotM UotM EGA +S (talk) 02:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Tough For. -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 23:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Cheat At Scrabble

Score: +16 with the triple letter score

Featured —rc (t) 06:53, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Self nom - Well here's another HowTo, seeing how well it does. Oh, and it spent 1 week on Pee Review. --—Braydie 07:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

and For --—Braydie 01:05, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Strong For I've said it before - This is a great article. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 17:42, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For A very funny article, with some pictures and words to boot! --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 18:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For. herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 21:22, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For, although I can't comment until the end of the trial.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 21:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
For Yayayayaya. love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 04:32, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For. :] -- ♥ Lacey • clicky 06:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For - One of the good HowTos. It's gne om I 07:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
F-o-r with the F on a triple-value square...lemme see...29 points! Yaay! I win! This howto really works! -- di Mario 09:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For -- Hindleyite Converse 12:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For Good. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
F-O-R I was palming those letters. --General Insineratehymn 00:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Foargh - pronounced the same as "for", this word represents the sound emitted when a walrus is attacked with an aubergine. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
A vote for this article. --gosh zillacorrespondence 12:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
For. I'm absolutely sure QQQQQ is a word! It's the name of a New Guinean tribe! Swordmaster 16:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

UnNews:Stupid kid drowns in pond

Score: +16 children dead in ridiculously small amounts of water

Featured —rc (t) 07:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Nom & For. Hah. Hahahah. This is one of the funniest UnNews articles I've ever seen. love, gustav ^{talk at me}_nope 23:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For. I might as well vote for my own stuff. Since when am I nominated for anything? I am going to seize the day, I say. --Danny Himself 23:31, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Monstrously cruel and distasteful, this has all the features we look for in our featured articles.--<<>> 23:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Strong For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For. --So So 23:54, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Very Strong For Hilarious in an evil and sadistic sort of way. --General Insineratehymn 23:56, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
Strong Against UnNews stuff is NOT featured article content. Jedibob5 23:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For Anybody who votes down something based on length is a LOSER. Just to preempt anybody who might. Also, this vote initially conflicted with the above vote, so also anybody who votes down something just because it is UnNews is a RETARD. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 23:59, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

It's also against the rules. So that vote doesn't count.. For --—Braydie 00:01, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Braydie's right, please read the final two bullets at the top of the page. —rc (t) 00:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Very Strong For What STM said. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For. So that's what a short UnNews story looks like. Most of mine go on for ever. This one's funny, too.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:52, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For funny stuff like this. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 03:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For You'd think I'd be sick of Mooses' stuff after reading it for over a year and a half, but no. Plus it doesn't take me forty minutes to read like the articles some people write. —rc (t) 04:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Alas, I wish I had written this. The credit here goes to Danny Himself. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:53, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
  - Er, oh. I assumed from the way you were defending it that it was yours. Crud, now that I look at the other votes I see that Danny Himself himself said it was his. Perhaps Danny Boy is the next Savethemooses... —rc (t) 04:56, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Against. Sorry. It's funny, yes, and it's not the length per se that bothers me, but a featured article should have more than three jokes, with things like fire hydrant being notable execptions. This one just doesn't fall under that category. -- cdr. thetoastman tlk ctr cun f@h 04:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Very strong for One of the best UnNews articles ever. --GAMESPOT=666 04:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For. So very good.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 06:59, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Against. One of the best UnNews articles I've seen, but it's very short and it's already on the front page. This could easily be expanded into a bigger article Tomtyke 07:17, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against As other people have said, it's awesome but needs expansion.--Imp88 08:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For. This article made me laugh out loud, which is very rare.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Neppset (talk • contribs) diff
For. This article is the funniest thing I have ever read on uncyclopedia. The author of this deserves an award. The bit about the Christmas presents is absolute genious. -- Graeme 17:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 19:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For'. Somewhat silly, but thumbs up -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 19:24, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Against. Afraid it just didn't make me laugh....-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 21:13, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
for. in lowercase. --gosh zillacorrespondence 22:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
For, but only because the father in this article reminds me of mine. - Nonymous 03:33, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

001

Score: +016

Featured —rc (t) 07:07, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Renom & For. An outstanding article that never should have been taken down in the first place.--<<>> 14:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
ReFor Madness!--Procopius 14:14, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 19:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 19:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Against.InfiniteMonkey 20:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For, although I forgot whatever it was I said as a comment for this last time. I'm sure it was both witty and inappropriate.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:18, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against. Not bad, but I think it's too manic and unfocused for a feature. Lemon. 21:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For! 001 and I went to the same elementary school. She's Dutch too, whaddayouknow. -- di Mario 21:42, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 00:57, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
004. --L 05:22, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For Could have sworn I already voted for this.--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:33, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For yet again.--Nydas 10:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Against--Winston 11:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Against. herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 17:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Yeah, I did! I know I did! --Anyone 18:54, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
For -- The Llama Llo ver !!! 19:12, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
For --Alksub 06:36, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For I feel bad that it became +010 with my vote :(.. I miss +009. --♥ Lacey • clicky 00:08, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
For Does this mean we can't make any more jokes about Daniel Craig?lol--Gaberou 02:06, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
For because small rodents with unusual abilities are always funny (until the eleventh or so time). --Ж WHEEEEE! 15:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
For I love jokes relating to rodents! --General Insineratehymn 11:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For Yup, a very clever piece of proes. --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 13:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For I actually was in a Bond movie once as an extra. I did the town drunk in "Diamonds are Forever". They cut my scene from the final release though. Can't remember why... -- di Mario 09:10, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
For because rodents are always funny, except that Mickey Mouse.--Ganall 23:57, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

The Vagina Monologues

Score: +16 genitalia that won't shut the hell up

Featured —rc (t) 07:13, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Nomination and For because puns rock. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For Literalism strikes again. Fucking unions. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:14, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For --monika 22:57, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For The later half redeems. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:31, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Heh. I felt like I needed to build some foundation before the payload delivery, but I'm sure the intro could be tightened up. :) ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 17:09, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

For. I put a lot of thought into this, but welcome any additions or edits to make it better. ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 16:11, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:54, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For, obviously. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 14:26, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Foreplay -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For...Todd's got culture, all of the sudden...--Shandon 22:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For...lots of culture...--Kevin Bell 02:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. This is great stuff. It's got Vaginae. It's got Monologs. What's not to love? --Anyone 20:37, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
For. OMGWTFROTFLMAOZEDONG11!! Mr T is on a roll!! first Idiot's Guide and now this? (though this one's of a much better quality & also, it's clear that he's NEVER getting laid, ever, and he knows) -- mowgli 17:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment ~ Yes. Sad, but true. I even complained about it in one of my recent newscasts. Sadly. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 05:55, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

For, ^_^ 17:33, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. Just not getting it. Sorry. --gosh zillacorrespondence 10:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

You must be horribly retarded or possibly you've never even heard of it. Tragic.. ♥ Lacey • clicky 00:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

For.--Winston 12:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For. It's Mr thejazz... a case not yet solved. 21:49, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Let's see -- tonight I've voted for Penis joke and The Vagina Monologues. That about covers the options.--Procopius 00:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
Strong For Ahh, I wish my vagina could talk. Lucky bitches. --♥ Lacey • clicky

Henchmen

Score: +17 thugs

Featured —rc (t) 07:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Nom and For; This article's gotten strong reviews at Pee Review, and I loved it, so I decided I'd finally nom it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:44, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 08:06, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 12:57, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For - winnah! - David Gerard 01:48, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Conditional for - basically solid concept with good jokes, but the graphics don't add much, and it could be cut down and tightened up considerably. InfiniteMonkey 03:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Excellent.-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 08:14, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
4. --L 17:39, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For. 15Mickey20 21:20, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For. We need more of this type of article. Just good solid writing, no gimmicks. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I've always been a minion, myself.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:49, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Keep the chain going. --gosh zill adisgusting unfunny nonsense 04:47, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 21:32, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak For. I liked it better before all the changes by the IP, but at the same time I couldn't write my way out of a urine-soaked paper bag (and I've tried too!) --Anyone 19:55, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. A good article in need of savage editing to make it shorter and tighter.--Winston 13:12, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Now we know about their sorry lives. Swordmaster 21:30, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For.--Procopius 00:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For - Dependable and expendable--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:34, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
For - How true and utterly timeless.--Gaberou 05:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

Dear John letter

Score: +18 versions enjoyed

Featured —rc (t) 07:05, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Nom and For. Ninety seven hilarious articles for the price of one. Highly original. Technically accomplished. Fun to edit. Kind to children. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 06:36, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For Wasn't sure, but the second last paragraph sold me. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:47, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For a new humourous letter with every pageload. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 11:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For- I make it $9.35251{\times 10^{19}}$ articles for the price of one. --Sir Jam 11:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
4 - Oh, that is fuckin' clever! Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 11:58, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Zyrac 20:21, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Against too close to reality for my taste. Been getting letters like that for the past 18 years. I co-operated with authorities, and still...No -- di Mario 20:46, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
Wow, for. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:50, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For --gosh zillacorrespondence 00:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
Against' -- Oh, ye Gads!!! Anyway, it's too short for an article, too long for a dear john letter. At least to me. Feureau 04:27, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Clarification ~ Actually, it's as long as several of its competitors combined: 15:04, 12 November 2006 ‎Dear John letter (hist) ‎[16,775 bytes] ‎Todd Lyons ~ but the content is random. It's meant to be re-loaded and re-read several dozen (97?) times. :) ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 05:34, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Strong for. This article screams ~~at that heartless bitch~~ to be on the front page.--Procopius 13:35, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For --—Braydie 13:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For Brilliant idea brilliantly executed. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:43, 1 December 2006
Five it's like a For but one integer more emphatic.Nullius in Verba 19:37, 2 December 2006 (UTC) (UTC)
For; I love this article. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:02, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
For--Winston 12:20, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For, but only because it occasionally mentions "restraining order". Ahhh, good times.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:31, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Weak For. I like random, but it can be sometimes too random. Still good though. --Anyone 18:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
FOR! Very good, but by the time you read this ill be looking at the next article.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Drewcoll (talk • contribs) - dif
Weak For Okay, I love the idea.. but I dislike how this would work on the front page. But I'll leave it up to the admins to figure that out :] Though I am still a little meh about it. --♥ Lacey • clicky 00:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
For a classic article Phal112 09:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
For unrequented love. -- Tits McGee 14:01, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Floor Mr. Bob approves.--Mr. Bob 16:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Internet Movie Database

Score: +18 movie(s) found. Search again?

Featured Thanks for the votes and the work people did on the article. :) —rc (t) 07:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

N+F. - User:Guest/sig 20:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
For --—Braydie 20:43, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:39, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For --Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 07:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Well done indeed. Lemon 07:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For So true Prolix 11:04, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 11:23, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Nicely done.--Procopius 14:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
For, but that review is mine. Just so you know. You can tell because I always spell it "porpaganda".--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Very For -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 02:28, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For --KWild 04:43, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For. About as good as the Awful Movie Database parodies. ~~- unsigned, not counted~~ Sorry. --L 14:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For --AtionSong 16:47, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
For Nice work.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 20:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)
Absolutely not. Heh, just kidding For... but you should've seen the look on your face! t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:38, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
FOR Very good, might I say classy in an IMDB sense.--drew 05:08, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
FOR Kakun nukaK 05:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
For Hehehe, made me giggle. I only go to IMDb to look for actors.. agh.. Oh well, good. --♥ Lacey • clicky 00:13, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Smell a Bit Like Fish

Score: +16 inspirational odors

Featured —rc (t) 04:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

SNom+F Why not. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 20:53, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For everything about it, even the title, has a charming and hilarious quirk to it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:22, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I'd say I always wanted to know how to smell like a fish, but I haven't, and furthermore; still don't. All the same, good show chap! And damn you Squiggle for conflicting my edit! --Anyone 21:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Almost makes me want to smell like fish. 15Mickey20 22:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For Sheer brilliance. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:09, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 02:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For InfiniteMonkey 02:46, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Leneface 10:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Strongest Possible For. Another feature for STM? What else is new? -- Sir C Holla | CUN 06:08, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 12:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
For. My ladies like me in haddock. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 08:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 09:23, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Against Not that funny or enjoyable, especially compared to the other options.--MrMetalFLower 10:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For Pretty funny. Tanktunker Take heed, this user may or may not be naked and/or insane.
For. What? I've mounted myself on a wall already! "Don't worry. Be happy. Woo-hoo-hoo...." -- The Colonel (talk) 20:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. Almost -- it's well-written, and I did enjoy the dialogue, but I guess I have a hard time buying into the premise. (Yes, I know how silly that sounds.) Sorry.--Procopius 20:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
weak Against Well written but lacking--Catch 22 11:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For ^_^ 18:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against.--Winston 12:57, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. The title alone was worth it, but I read the whole thing and loved it. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
For aquatic body odour - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:09, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --gosh zill adisgusting unfunny nonsense 23:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Against, I liked the "Benefits of smelling a bit like fish" bit, but the rest...not so much.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:24, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For, tis just plain hilarious. --Zig 16:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
For Nice. It's Mr thejazz... a case not yet solved. 22:10, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Make a Band

Score: +16 exploding drummers

Featured —rc (t) 06:01, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

For and Nom. A great article by local n00b, Braydie. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak For A bit lengthy but still quite enjoyable.--Gaberou 21:36, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For. via the long road to tweakville. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 21:39, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For - Not bad at all - I may be giving it a tweak in a while because being in a band is such a pit of fucked-upness that there's endless uncyclopedic potential documenting the bitching. SPINAL TAP IS REAL - David Gerard 22:24, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
FOR - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For - Great article from a new user. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 00:05, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For because I want to be included in the lineup...I can play triangle!--Shandon 22:33, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Really great stuff, and earned my NotM vote for sure. --Anyone 20:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
For, even though I'm a low-on-the-totem-pole piano player. Swordmaster 21:44, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong for. (Claps hands) herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 23:53, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
Even stronger for. Good work, Braydie. -- Hindleyite Converse 21:40, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Kwakerjak 00:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 10:23, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 15:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
For I enjoyed writing it, thanks for the input some of you contributed. --—Braydie 09:21, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For, ~~even though~~ because it's unkind to bassists. ~ Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 02:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
For Thanks to this article, I have formed my own band! Expect us to play in your town never! --General Insineratehymn 09:21, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Against. This is probably funnier to musicians than to people like myself who use pianos for room decoration..--Winston 12:41, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Fundagelical Christianity

Score: +18 fruitless attempts at intercourse

Featured —rc (t) 07:40, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Nom and for. So it's like this. I was clicking on the random page button and I happened to come across this delightful little wonder which, in my opinion, is quite a nice read. I liked it so much that I decided to nominate it. --General Insineratehymn 22:00, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
For. A favourite of mine (who woulda thought, a fave of the user with the fundie fixation...).--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
For Man I'm such a whore. Such a sexy, sexy, whore. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Johnleemk 10:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I need to write this sort of thing some time - David Gerard 13:22, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
4. --L 14:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 17:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. 15Mickey20 22:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 00:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
For-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 19:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
FOR - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:08, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For; the reason this article is so amazing is because it doesn't just satire Fundamental Christianity, but it also skewers the stupidity of the guy narrating it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:43, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
For--Enigma16
For--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:32, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
Against Rambling and not encyclopedic at all. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:28, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For InfiniteMonkey 08:05, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For, ^_^ 21:34, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I likes it. --Anyone 19:40, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 04:30, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For. Very clever and original.--Procopius 20:52, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For. I liked the "seventh grade composition" style. herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 21:05, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
For. InfiniteMonkey 20:15, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Googlewhack

Score: +18 times caught googlewhacking by your parents

Featured —rc (t) 09:06, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Nom & for - If you vote for it, I promise you'll never have to look at it again. I promise. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 00:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Now remember — you've promised. ~ T. (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For As soon as I hit submit, I'm clicking that link again just to see if you're right emc! --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 01:52, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For, only if EMC keeps his word. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 22:47, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For Great article, but a disturbing image 0_o. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:37, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
"Uncyclopedia Admin votes Against another quality article at VFH," but that was predictable in this case.--<<>> 00:55, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Nope. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 03:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
For. The Ed. notes make it great. Goshzilla 12:14, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Against. What was I thinking?. Goshzilla 01:34, 20 November 2006 (UTC) Old/duplicate votes. ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 23:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  - Weak for. I read the WP article, and the Dave Gorman references are mildly funny now. Also, Mhaille did some Republican-esque lobbying. Unsigned vote. Please fix this, Goshzilla, and quit changing your mind. ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 23:50, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    - Weak for. As per right above. Sorry I forgot to sign before. --Goshzilla 00:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
For. You sick bastard. --Anyone 20:30, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
For for reasons I can't remember now...RWG 01:15, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Against, even though when I think about you, I touch myself.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:58, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. - User:Guest/sig 16:30, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 19:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Pour Idiot over me forgot to use the * thing, what a loser, hehe, hehehehe, hehehhehe... NeoZidane CUNT Headbutt extraordinaire

______соединяйтесь!

For. Dave Gorman can feck off. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 22:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
For. We've all Googlewhacked at least once or twice, I figure. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:24, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 10:02, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
For, Captain Obvious paid a visit. 18:39, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For - First, I love masturbation. Second, He did not have to whore his votes because he is just so loveable. --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 23:52, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I even whore other people's articles now - David Gerard 00:17, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
Against I will not be assimilated, and it's got room for improvement. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 08:11, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Even though it's all one long masturbation joke, as Mr. Mhaille points out. And I will not be beaten at article whoring. -- Hindleyite Converse 21:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
For. *whacks* - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:24, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --Guido Arbia 19:15, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
Against Please, please, please don't put any of those pictures on the front page. PLEASE. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 16:51, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- The pictures are the best part....uh, no, you didn't hear me say that! --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 19:30, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For --—Braydie 16:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For Why the hell not--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:58, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For Nice image, too funny article. It's gne om I 13:07, 27 November 2006 (UTC)
For We didn't start the fire It was always burning Since the world's been turning... Sliferjam ~ This is my new signature. Cool huh? 00:25, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
Against I didn't like this at all, especially those pictures Prolix 03:58, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Life's Unanswerable Questions

Score: +19 unanswerable questions

Featured —rc (t) 08:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Nom and For. Accessible, clever and LOL - David Gerard 14:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
One must first contemplate the options. If pushed, I would say yes, but then I was the author. -- Hindleyite 14:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
for, still room for expansion though - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Mild against. It feels like it's missing something somewhere.--Winston 15:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Well, one thing it's missing is the "Overly British" template. Either that, or section for the unanswerable question "What the fuck is so great about EastEnders that the Brits won't shut up about it?" --Kwakerjak 22:20, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Just answered for you - David Gerard 08:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Well done. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 00:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For Wow that's hilarious! Lt. Wyoming 08:01, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For A towering work of the human intellect. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:13, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. Looks like it's been edited by like 10 people, none of whom are sure what they want to write about. This subject could be done a lot better if it were more coherent. --So So 01:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For 04:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Against, either this is too British, or it just isn't for me. Either way, I didn't really laugh.--<<>> 15:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak For. Hard to understand at times due to it's overly Britishness. Then again, any British at all is overly British. You guys put the UK in Fcuk! Still good though even though I don't get all of it, because I was born in the US and A like God intended. --Anyone 21:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Hilariously enough, this external link is actually funnier than the article itself. Also, Abstain. --L 06:17, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Against as per Bradphraser, mostly.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:52, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For. And a general request: please, for the love of god, stop writing LOL!!! I'm feeling like we're becoming ED. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 15:33, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
For. LOL. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 09:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

You Bastard...-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 14:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Yah! Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 13:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For. It's British, but I have PBS. And the Guardian on my web browser. As for Eastenders, the appeal is lost on me, but I'm sure the English find Americans' love of Seinfeld baffling.--Procopius 20:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. lawl. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 22:09, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For - Death and God! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:17, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Even if it is overly British (which would be immaterial to me anyway), the "Did you threaten to overrule him?" reference makes it completely worthwile alone. --Sir Jam 11:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
For the whore I ~~adore~~ greatly admire. ~ T. (talk) 21:04, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Hani 18:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
For Philosophy=good. British humour=good. Hindleyite's wiriting=good.--The One and Only Czar Yah 22:56, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
For All too close to the truth, and that makes it brilliant.--Sayle 20:15, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Hindleyite hit gold. --gosh zill adisgusting unfunny nonsense 04:37, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
For —Braydie 18:11, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

Gaydar

Score: +18 centipoofs on the Gaydar

Featured YA SRSLY —rc (t) 08:09, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

nom and for. I thought this was pretty funny and the graphic is genius, and it's got the potential to be even better. For instance, there must be some kind of gaydar jamming system, right?InfiniteMonkey 23:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak for -- I'll change my vote to For after I make a few touch-ups. Note to all: halt voting on this submission until I've fixed it up a bit (nothing serious; just some minor tunings). Or not. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 23:25, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm done, and for. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 23:31, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Strong Against. Short and no laughs. The pic is good though. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 23:58, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

thanks :) --Huffers 02:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Strong for. This is a funny. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 00:21, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Very Strong For. Not that it makes any difference, adding strength. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:03, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
A For so strong, its almost butch. I gave this one a good going over too. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:36, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong for, nice and edgy, good content balance, great puns.. yeah funny !.--Vosnul 10:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Reluctant For. Ok, fine, I'll vote for this gay-themed article, but this is the last one I'm voting for for a while.--<<>> 14:15, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
For in a ruggedly heterosexual manner - David Gerard 12:10, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment I don't care for the article, but the Gaydiation image made me laugh... You should VFP that one! --Mindsunwound: (MUN) Torture Water Here 20:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Sure. References to Buckyballs and that mysterious siren in Vanilla Sky secured my vote. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:49, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Indeed yes. After I had snorted out big laughter-chunks at the image, the rest of the article fell into place. 09:07, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For. The humor is obvious and deserves to be noticed.-- 15:11, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For: funny, and made me pull out my old Palm to see if http://www.freewarepalm.com/mature/gaydardeluxe_v22a.shtml still worked. --User:Falcotron/sig 01:42, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Yesses.' Mostly for the Gaydiation picture. Dumitru 01:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
No thank you -Heh heh funny, but not enough for VFH. The picture is gold, though. --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:27, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
Against IMO, it just doesn't have that classic burning sarcasm that some of my favorites have. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 03:25, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
For because it was started by a friend of mine --Huffers 20:07, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
For but I'm not for Gay marriage for straight people. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 00:25, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
For Gaydiation. LOL --Savant13 21:36, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
sorta For takes a concept and runs with it but maybe wants trimming a bit. A little tumescent for my tastes. Pewpewpew 02:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 22:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For --Thetanmancan 03:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Gay. --So So 06:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Agaynst. Not that funny. --Anyone 18:13, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Thuper For it'th tho, tho funny, and the imageth are jutht Fab-ulouth! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
For, mostly because of the "Jamming and Stealth" section. --Kwakerjak 00:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:04, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Fabulous. Simply Fabulous. --Legolasegb 18:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Meh.-- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 16:29, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Gay.--Kevin Bell 00:49, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. --The Llama Llo ver !!! 01:59, 04 November 2006 (UTC)
For I think it is sehr gut! --84.70.154.3 17:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For Oh how I love the concept of gaydar :D --♥ Lacey • clicky 20:11, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For Good meaty content--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
~~Close, but no cigar. I might change my mind, though. --Goshzilla 22:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)~~
- Weak for. --Goshzilla 10:00, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Pick one or the other; you can't vote both ways.--<<

>> 22:55, 22 November 2006 (UTC)

- - The most recent vote stands: for. --Goshzilla 15:28, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Against 69.205.12.125 18:50, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Total Fucking Asshole Server 2006

Score: +20 staplers ruthlessly stolen

Featured —rc (t) 07:13, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

Nom and strong for. Totally fucking hilarious.--Procopius 00:53, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For This "ENeMA" is a very funny and strange character. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:02, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For Very funny Prolix 02:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. - User:Guest/sig 03:36, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For 04:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Yeah -- Sir C Holla | CUN 04:58, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Aye ---no, yuo chat 10:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. One cool thing about this article is that it looks heaps like the joke I made on IRC when I was banned as a misconfigured human proxy. The first two paragraphs are excellent, but the rest just doesn't cut it. -- The Colonel (talk) 10:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

I got the idea off of an IRC discussion. I may have stolen it from you. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 19:55, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

For - anyone who's used Windows will understand this is just the next logical step - David Gerard 11:45, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I actually think the first 2 paragraphs arn't that great, but the rest is awesome, especially the dialogues. --Anyone 21:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I think one of these handles my email. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 09:08, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
I give this Fucking Asshole System a For (oh for). --UtarEmpire 11:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I like expletives and the featured articles page is sorely lacking in them. Fuck, fuck, fuck.-- Imrealized ...hmm? 09:21, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For.InfiniteMonkey 09:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
I made a grave mistake - I read it during a business meeting and nearly collapsed laughing. For. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 14:43, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Super stuff. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 07:55, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For, the talk between the servers is hilarious. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 09:20, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Against.--Winston 12:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For - I like. Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 23:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For "Your paper is significantly lacking in ethnic slurs. I'll go right on ahead and add some for you, kike." What more can one man say? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:50, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
For Loved it; ruthlessly demeaning crap like this is funny. --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 22:41, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Hell Yeah Its come far from a spur-off-the-moment IRC discussion--The One and Only Czar Yah 00:36, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
For--Enigma16 01:43, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
For -G'ahead Alksub 08:33, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
FOR I almost started crying. --Weatherman1126 06:33, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
For. It's so true. --gosh zill adisgusting unfunny nonsense 04:51, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

Argos

Score: +18

Featured —rc (t) 06:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

Self-nom and for. I'm not a big self-nommer, but I really enjoyed writing this and it seems, on the evidence of Pee Review, a few others also quite liked it. -- Hindleyite 14:01, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For ~ I've been to an Argos, but it had a different name for some reason. ~ T. (talk) 14:11, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For A fine example of an article where having no fucking clue about the subject matter still left it with some jokes. --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 18:24, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For So good, so good, and so true - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:05, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For. And how about doing one on Iceland (supermarket)? -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 02:56, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For 03:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For.--Winston 15:43, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Against... too obscure...or am I just stupid? -- Sir C Holla | CUN 00:15, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

It's probably more British than obscure. Scores of millions of Brits, millions of norteamericanos and hundreds of thousands of Aussies know it. Think of it as a really bizarre kind of Pommy Wal-Mart if you will. -- Sir Armando Perentie

KUN FP 01:16, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

What, they don't have Argos in other countries? Just pretend it reads 'some cruddy American catalogue company' instead of 'Argos'. :) -- Hindleyite 11:51, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

For. Some damned kookey article about some Brit shithole. I'll vote for it out of pity, but write about something all American next time, you goddam commie rat bastard... --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 19:54, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I don't know what the hell this article is about, or what an Argos is, or if it even exists. I'm even questioning whether Hindleyite was cognescent when he wrote this. Funny stuff though. For. --Anyone 20:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For, although, frankly, it's just not British enough. Oh, you could see my tongue in my cheek? Dang. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:28, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I felt more detail was needed on the mysterious beings that lurk behind the scenes at Argos, so I added some and now I can vote for in good conscience. 15Mickey20 21:43, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay, maybe my changes weren't that great, but having been to Argos, I still think it needs something about the mysterious backroom happenings (or maybe I just have an old Jasper Carrott stand-up bit stuck in my head). 15Mickey20 18:11, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

For because Americans need to know these things. --Zyrac 19:48, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
This bloody pen isn't working properly......bugger. For -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 20:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For America's overseas ~~friends~~ ~~allies~~ acquaintances.--Procopius 20:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For; read this a while ago, lolled, forgot to vote. Alas. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. A fine catalogue of humour. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:19, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For, this article is dealing with UK "culture"--—Braydie 19:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Hani 18:33, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
For How did I miss voting for this? I loved it the first time I read it. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 21:50, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. Also, the voting should be delayed a day, see the talk page.
- God, I'm a retard. I forgot to sign. --Goshzilla 15:32, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
  - Eh, which talk page, why?--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 16:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
For Because--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 16:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

UnBooks:The Complete Idiot's Guide To Talking To Women

Score: +19.5 stupid thoughts

Featured (He always does this when it's my turn at bat. Gone, like a fart in the wind.) ~ Major Sir Todd Lyons GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC 06:48, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Nom & For - A lot of work went into this; one of the best UnBooks out there by far. Absolutely terrific. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 05:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Todd Lyons will never get laid.

For--monika 05:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

For. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 09:13, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For - The Blaque
For (?) ~ This just goes to show that after a over year here, I still have no idea which of my articles are funny, and which ones suck. Thanks for pointing this one out. ~ T. (talk) 11:40, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- Agree with Monika. Todd Lyons is the only one who'll never get laid. -- mowgli 12:46, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For. XD -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 13:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. The Todd Lyons hit parade continues.--Procopius 13:53, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For - -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:44, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. Funny, definitely. But you can find this kind of humor all over the place.
"Speaking of all over the place, my wife/girlfriend/whatever is so fat that her ass..." ..Ah, forget it...
--So So 15:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- Hindleyite 15:16, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 19:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
against, don't hit me. it is funny, but it's an unbook not an article, it should be here UnBooks:Vote for Featured UnBook - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:59, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
- Conversation moved to talk page.
For --Llama-Llover 21:54, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For --User:Nintendorulez 22:02, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Against unbooks are mediocre jokes in themed giftwrapping. + article much to close to the truth. Be off with you --Vosnul 23:43, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For - I must admit, the lack of any "Now really, what kind of question is that?" responses was odd. Although if one formed it that way, it may be out of the question already... --Ж WHEEEEE! 03:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For Seems good enough 03:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For.--Winston 15:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- I helped it a little bit, and I think it's funny, so why not. LadySway1985 00:23, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Funny and useful. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For. You saved my love life AND my marriage--I'll never get kicked in the balls again! Thanks T.! --Anyone 20:30, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For Mrthejazz 23:38, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Definitely Against I didn't laugh at all, pretty weak. 24.94.19.107 00:31, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Against I think that it could make for a good satire on the stupidity of male attitudes to women, but it just seems to use those attitudes as props - and that stuff has been done before, sadly. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:39, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Against, as per SoSo & HF.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:48, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. I would prefer there to be some more general advice mixed in, rather than just an endless procession of questions and answers. Well, not endless, but a procession nonetheless. 15Mickey20 21:54, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. It is funny, but mostly a collection of good jokes and not really "a great piece of writing".---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 03:30, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For--Viking 12:55, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak AgainstFunny but more of a list than an article.--Winstanley1 11:46, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For the love of a good woman. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 14:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Because I could actually use this. I can't get past hooking up at parties. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For- Nice! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For- Amazing article props - Noradseven
For, it's funny enough as it is. Johnleemk 15:38, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. Just against. - User:Guest/sig 09:57, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I could have sworn I already voted for this, like, a month ago.--<<>> 00:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
For Very good stuff you've got ther. --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 00:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Inanimate Sponge

Score: +18.5

Featured —rc (t) 07:23, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

Nom & For - I did a lot of work on this, but its not a self-nom (is it?). I hope you can look beyond the insanity, and realize that this could very well happen. Sponge for 2016 ya'll. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 02:59, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
For; Saw this in progress. LOVED it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:04, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
I love shit like this. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
For I've never met a sponge bob I didn't like.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:49, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Even though he doesn't live in a pineapple under the sea, I would vote for this sponge. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 22:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
... That's a "For" in terms of the inaminate sponge. --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 22:37, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
For Because sponges are awesome, and we will be killed if we don't all voteThe awesome Rwg 22:39, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I told the Republican National Committee that a squeegee would make a better candidate than Jeb Bush, but would they listen? Noooo! --Kwakerjak 22:52, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. Reminds me of Fire hydrant, only keeps it going through the whole article. P.S. Kwakerjak, are you planning on a U.S. Presidential Election, 2016? User:Wehpudicabok/sig 01:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

Not really. I want to see how much I can get out of the ones in the past before I try the ones that haven't happened yet. --Kwakerjak 18:33, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

For. Sponge-a-larious. Goshzilla 20:11, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Yay. Because I feel like we don't use that word enough around here. --Anyone 20:27, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
For. We have much to learn from sponge(s). -- Imrealized ...hmm? 07:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Why do you yanks always vote for stupid individuals like George W. and this sponge? For. -- The Colonel (talk) 01:44, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
For, 15:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
For. This guy might have a fair chance of winning. Swordmaster 02:29, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For Poo 69.221.72.72 06:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I had already voted for this, but a glitch in my voting machine made me vote for I maed a yuky doody instead.--<<>> 23:11, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Yay, it has my picture on it! Of course for. It's gne om I 08:43, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 00:35, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

The Bureaucracy Channel

Score: +18 TVs at work

Featured —rc (t) 05:43, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

N+F A guffaw coated with mirth, wrapped in ROFL. Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 20:14, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Yah. -- Hindleyite 20:16, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
for. fantastic. like a beaurocracy themed 'tv go home' - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:31, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
~~This would normally be the sort of thing I'd vote for, but this I just ain't feelin'. Weak Against. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)~~

I lied, For. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:13, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I can't help but feel partially to blame for this... --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
For --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 02:03, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Too listy for my tastes.--<<>> 02:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

*Against. Way too listy.--Kevin Bell 02:13, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment, um, yeah. It's a programming schedule. They're like that.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:44, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment - And unlike most lists, it gives some humorous explanations. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 05:30, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

For. Ok, ok, its good now.--Kevin Bell 00:58, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

For.--Procopius 12:16, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
For. "While you were outsourced"...genius. --Anyone 14:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
For I could see myself watching this.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 16:07, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment That's just sad. . . Dr. Kevorkian has a treatment for when you're that bored. ;) Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 20:05, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Against all lists. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:48, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Sigh see my comment above. Again, sigh.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I love lists, me. Great lists. Very listy. Remarkably list-like. An almost erotic sense of listability. Where would we be without lists ... Listless!! arf arf. (One of my many list-related jokes- for others, refer to the list.). I HATE commas though. You just got away with those. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Great content, despite the messy format. (Tip: If you need an extra level of subheadings, try "==== ====". Don't use the main title markup "= =" in the article body - it's butt ugly.) -- The Colonel (talk) 17:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
MO fix. MO make funny words and pictures. MO not like formatting. MO king of jungle!--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:19, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
For.Put that on Skynet.--Jtaylor1 03:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
Where can I find form 12323XCHFOR/b? -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 13:39, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:55, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
For. 02:36, 30 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Brilliant. Deliciously cruel sledge at the BBC, though Otis Redding deserves better -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 09:40, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Maybe you could parody more shows to fill in the "Tonight" schedule. Swordmaster 17:38, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:26, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Shades of Brazil in an article-sized dose that is remarkably non-listy. Yay! -- Imrealized ...hmm? 14:55, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Against.--Winston 13:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Johnleemk 10:38, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Pontius Pilot

Score: +22 crucified voters

Featured —rc (t) 07:10, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Nom and for. This article is hilarious and the picture has been featured. --Onion 01:34, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Against, it's cute, but too short.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC) Abstain, add more and it'll be a for.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:22, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Aw, screw it> It's the motion of the ocean, not the size of the waves. For. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:29, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
For? Cool. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. I just re-read it. Not to brag or anything, but I'm a frickin' genius! I forgot how good that article was. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 04:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Very short, but the entire thing is hilarious. Should be expanded, but until such a time, still has my support. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:50, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Regretfully Against. Its a great joke and I love the pic, but sorry STM its just too short. It is hilarious though. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Short, but hilarious. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Very good. 14:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Mr Mayfair, was there a reason you deleted my vote? --Anyone 16:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment It was probably just a mistake since Tom voted for several articles in one big edit. Yours got lost. I've restored it below. —rc (t) 16:35, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Ah, here here. All's well that ends as well as it started out, no weller or less well than before. Thanks. --Anyone 12:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

For. It is too short, but what's there is so damn well thought out and put together I can't say no. --Anyone 14:26, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. If it's expanded etc etc... 07:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 10:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Humorous.--<<>> 14:46, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For and Against people who vote down articles based solely on their length. —rc (t) 20:47, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For and Against Anyone who votes down articles based solely on their length.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 05:17, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Boooo. That is all. --Anyone 12:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

For short, funny, to the point. A proper joke. Pewpewpew 01:57, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For, because I'd rather see an article that is short and funny than one which gets padded out with unfunny extras for the sake of length. 15Mickey20 19:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Comment Well-said, sir. Brevity is the soul of wit. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 20:17, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 22:53, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For and a nod of agreement to Mickey. --SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 02:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
For. paradox's, I love that picture.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 05:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Weak Against Although this article is very clever and quite funny, I can't vote for it because it's much too short to be featured. Great picture though. --Thetanmancan 03:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For--it's short and sweet, like most jokes should be. KappaDelta 01:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
For an article with 80% less fat and 30% more sacrilege than other leading FA's!
Research: USDA
--So So 07:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:09, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
~~I enjoyed this article very thoroughly--- Truly Yours, The Exalted One. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.30.42.178 (talk • contribs)~~

Unsigned, I need the diff for it to count. —rc (t) 07:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

For Good laughs --69.152.37.215 04:55, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
For Not that this needed someone else to vote for it. --Nakedman 00:33, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Gaberou 00:20, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Against It was far too short, and I dunno.. I didn't find it EXTRA-ORDINARILY funny. --♥ Lacey • clicky 20:16, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. It made me laugh. All I need.--Procopius 14:08, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For It's about time this article gets nominated.--65.27.212.74 01:09, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
For I get it. --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 03:08, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Biblical reference for the win. --{{User:Stevo the human/sig}} 00:14, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

*For good article--Bagoballs 13:18, 20 November 2006 (UTC) told him on his talk page not to vote for articles that have been already been FA...-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:02, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

The Uncyclopedian's Song

Score: +23 models of a good Uncyclopedian

Featured —rc (t) 07:55, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Nom and Strong For; This truly took effort, and now has Audio. Nothing is cooler than this. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:30, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Yes --Zyrac 20:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --Anyone 20:38, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For but lose the chorus. 20:40, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment All 9 tracks of it? Nah. Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 23:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

For. It's an in joke - but it's a charm in joke. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 21:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For - A great tune. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 21:33, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Nicely done. ~ T. (talk) 21:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Against this should be in UnTunes! (kidding!) This is the best song I've heard on Uncyc all day, For.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
Fur - Aw, shucks! Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 23:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Funniest. Thing. Ever. -- 00:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. The audio seals it. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong Against. Stupid, Short, Injokey, CRAP. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:48, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Lots of hard work went into this :] Troll is a jolly fellow. --Toratoritore 06:52, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Catchy tune, with cool lyrics. ---- Codestream (07:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC))
God fucking dammit no, you assholes. Stop nominating in jokes already. InfiniteMonkey 07:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment - Little extreme there, wot? Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 09:49, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Against. Very clever and funny, but I for one don't wanna see in-jokes on the front. I appreciate the fact that a lot of work went into it, but as any ditch digger will tell you, hard yakka don't equal massive public recognition... -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 08:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Comments - Moved to Talk:VFH.

For. Because it's bloomin' funny. We need a link to the audio on the front page if it's featured. -- Hindleyite 11:56, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For/ Damn you tooltroll, I've been humming it all day long....-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 13:13, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment - Bwahahaha! And so, it begins. . . Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 13:25, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Weak For. It's very well-done. It's an in-joke, which holds me from a full for, but it's more general than most. Outsiders could appreciate this.--Procopius 13:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Sweet jesus, I am ever so much against in-jokes, and I wouldn't even hesitate to vote against one... But this one is too damn good... It's not even an in-joke as much as it is an informative song about the site... Heck, THIS ISN'T AN IN-JOKE, PEOPLE! Big fat FOR!!! ⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H|NS|+S 18:03, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment YEAH! Everybody listen to Money$ign. He gets it. Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 23:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

For. Sheer briliance, but the chorus parts seemed a bit fuzzy. But what do I know, I've only been playing music for 6 years.--The Jeff Killer 18:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Weak Againstimpenetrable in joke.--Sir Bungle 19:33, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For - Ok, you do have audio with it! I love music! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:11, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For I totally love it. I've heard a different song to this same tune, and just imagining somebody actually singing it cracks me up. --The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 01:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Very, very reluctant against. I'd be happy to vote for Tooltroll for WotM purely on the basis of this one article (in fact, I tink I'll go nominate him, if no one else has). But it's an in-joke, and I really don't think in-jokes should be highlighted. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Anyone who'll even attempt to sing a Gilbert & Sullivan parody deserved a feature, especially given the work that went into it. Yes, it's an in-joke, but it's that's not the point. It's funny.--<<>> 13:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
Very weak for and I'll tell ya why... I really do love this. The audio is amazing. I also love in-jokes. But I do think this needs at least some expansion to resemble an article instead of just the song lyrics. Some story of the song's conception or the like. Still, I cannot vote against such fine work, and the very weak is merely ornamental. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For Alksub 22:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
ForLoving the audio. Kudos--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 07:12, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For BEST SONG EVER. --Kingkitty 08:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For The amount of work that went into this injoke allows it to deserve my blessing. --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 23:53, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment. I've seen alot of complaints about this being too much of an in-joke, and not really even an article... Well, here's a proposition then - Let's feature it on the site's birthday, which, if memory serves me right, is sometime in mid-January. Just think about it, not only would it solve some of these complaints, but it'd be the perfect article to feature on that day. Now we just need a reskin... t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:07, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
For I agree with Mr. Tompkins. --Sir Tripod2282 cun vfp talk Active ~01:21, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
For That is awesome...The awesome Rwg 01:27, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

Double Ristretto Venti Half-Soy Nonfat Decaf Organic Chocolate Brownie Iced Vanilla Double-Shot Gingerbread Frappuccino Extra Hot With Foam Whipped Cream Upside Down Double Blended, One Sweet'N Low and One Nutrasweet, and Ice

Score: +24 Double Ristretto... ah, fuck it.

Featured Despite Squig's graciousness, I'd rather keep things in order unless there's a compelling reason not to (like featuring the political article on the day of the elections). —rc (t) 06:37, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Nom & for - Ignore the long title. This is a work of art; an excellent parody of Starbucks, courtesy of Sir Squiggle. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 23:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
I approve with great vigor. Ho hum! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
I'll have whatever he had. For. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 00:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong for I approve of this article and everything it stands for. Marblefluss 02:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. If I vote against, they'll kill me. --{{User:Stevo the human/sig}} 02:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I work at a Starbucks. Hilarious. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:46, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Because it's cute and has cute content. --Toratoritore 06:50, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Interesting article. ---- Codestream 07:01, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
4. --L 07:15, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
A big fat FOR excellent stuff! Made me laugh, alot. --MrMetalFLower 10:39, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Nice stuff. Regular Starbucks' coffee makes my stomach feel like there's an alien in it.--Procopius 13:29, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
against. Good concept, but the actual article is ponderous and too predictable in my opinion. --Gubby 14:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For Because of the childrens, and because it's funny. But mainly for the childrens. Tanktunker Take heed, this user may or may not be naked and/or insane.
For - David Gerard 22:30, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For... yep --The Llama Llo ver !!! 23:28, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
For Against I'd like it better if it was good. Shotgun vote. Yay whores! --McDestroyertron (talk) 00:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For - I love my little Squiggle! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 01:07, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Good God, that's a long title. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 01:08, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For, though I don't quite see what all the fuss is about — that's what I order every time I go into a Starbucks. --Kwakerjak 04:38, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For You people make me sick. 04:49, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For Hot tip - take some coffee in a thermos, and save $$$ --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:52, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I had a fun time reading this. Plus the picture of Cornbread working at Starbucks adds to the zaniness. I think I was at that Starbucks once, actually. I paid with a twenty and Cornbread tried to give me change for a ten. Good times. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Now there's an idea for MO or ZB to make a picture from. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo

GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 21:24, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

I'd try, but then I'd have to write a CB page...which would get huffed as vanity. It's just not worth it...and while I'm here, Abstain as I'm a Tim Horton's coffee kind of guy.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

For. Did I not vote for this yet? -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 21:30, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I could've sword I had also already voted for this as well... --User:Nintendorulez 00:15, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For A very well written piece of ummmmmmm I don't know what it is. Very funny anyway.--Coleridge49 02:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment It seems the time for featuring is soon, and my article has +23 votes when Pontius Pilot, in 2nd place, has +18. Because it is an infinitely better article, and has patiently waited a very, very long time for this day, I say feature Pontius Pilot first. Unless something comes ahead of or ties with PP, in that case just feature mine :). I probably won't be here the rest of today or tomorrow, which is why I'm putting this here now. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For Or should I say Frap Not that it really counts or anything. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:06, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
For with half&half and two sugars--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:17, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Waiting for Godot

Score: +19 existential minutes

N+F Nice one. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 16:14, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment - although it was funnier when you linked to Waiting For Godot. -- Sir Mhaille

(talk to me)

For I like it. I like it a lot. Also, I fixed the link first...jerkfaces. --Anyone 16:21, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For.--Procopius 16:38, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For -One of mine (well, mostly). --Jamtrousers 17:22, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Against - Funny, but I'm fucking sick of narrative articles, such as this, this, this, this, possibly this, and definitely this, plus many more. Unoriginality kills. Yawn. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 18:28, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Ha! --SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 19:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For, very Pythonesque. --Nydas 19:50, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For And not just because I added a few jokes. It's a very good representation of a book that, in all honesty, and for all its brilliance, deserves to be lampooned. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:41, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I actually enjoyed this play. Also the "small, green, sentient energy cloud" line is so random that I had to laugh. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 23:00, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Wow, this was funny before, but now it's terrific.--<<>> 04:09, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Agree with EMC. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 04:56, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Blah 05:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For - I wasn't sure I was cooked, but others were - David Gerard 11:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For...I actually laughed instead of just smirking, for once--Shandon 15:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Better than the play itself. -- Hindleyite 17:28, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Shall I vote for? Yes, I shall (Doesn't vote) -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A
Against. When I first looked at it I though, "Man, some stupid IP has vandalised it!" But when I looked at the history, I realised there was no such thing as the "non-vandalised" revision. Self-referencing has long jumped the shark, mate! -- The Colonel (talk) 14:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
YOU FOOLS!!! Before you ever, ever call this a load of carp, please actually understand the play. Oh, yeah and weak for. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 19:47, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

ESTRAGON: What about hanging ourselves?

VLADIMIR: Hmm. It'd give us an erection.

ESTRAGON: (highly excited) An erection!

VLADIMIR: With all that follows. Where it falls mandrakes grow. That's why they shriek when you pull them up. Did you not know that?

ESTRAGON: Let's hang ourselves immediately!

Comment: who called it a load of crap? I think ENeGMA summed up the idea pretty well- respectful lampooning (because no matter how strange, it is an excellent play). --Jamtrousers 20:13, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
For got a kick out of the context, even if I hadn't read the actual thing (play or whatever.)--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 05:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I would love to see the parody of this Bekket play with only a mouth speaking, or "Krapp's last tape". Or anything by Ionesco.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 01:05, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:30, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For Reading this in school was PAINFUL --Han 09:24, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
For - Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:34, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
For I loved that play when I saw it live. I was laughing cause no one in the audience knew what was going on, and I was like "How can you people not get it? There is nothing going on!" --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 03:02, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
For. all high-brow and shit - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:22, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
For: The dumbest play ever made lampooned by the funniest Uncyclopedia article ever written. I'm voting for it. Sir Master Pain (also known as Betty) 23:08, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

VLADIMIR: Well, let's go.

ESTRAGON: Yes, let's.

(They do not move.)

For Beautiful work --KUK nerd 04:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Meh. --Kwakerjak 15:17, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
For. InfiniteMonkey 05:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)