From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- I'm confused. Is this supposed to be funny? At least, it could have been cohesive. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:13, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. does not deserve to live. -- '"`UNIQ--postMath-00000002-QINU`"' 01:48, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
- No. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:50, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Bluhh. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Feb 1 '12 8:29 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:52, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Crap ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:40, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. -- '"`UNIQ--postMath-00000003-QINU`"' 16:13, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Pretty obvious how to improve this, and that's why it shouldn't be improved. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:26, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
- AAAAAAAA! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:07, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Go away. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Feb 1 '12 9:42 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete.<insert witty reason about how this is too informational and not funny here> -- '"`UNIQ--postMath-00000004-QINU`"' 19:07, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Where are the jokes? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:49, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Radioactive! Ha ha! Chernobyl jokes... --Gamma287 22:53, January 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. No laughs here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:45, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
- What ^ they said. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Feb 1 '12 9:46 (UTC)
- Delete. Everything's already been said. So... penis. -- 21:21, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- I am very confused right now. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:18, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
- WTF? -- '"`UNIQ--postMath-00000005-QINU`"' 19:13, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
- How thought-provoking......NOT! --Scofield & Friends 19:50, January 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Title more interesting than the content. But that's it. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:43, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
- lol no. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:33, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Awww, MAN! I thought all the articles I did while I was high on pot were funny! Damn! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Feb 1 '12 9:41 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- WTF? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 03:34, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Needs help. Mattsnow 03:46, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Redirect to Why?:Help? --Scofield & Friends 14:45, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. We can help this on its way out. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:50, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:32, February 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- OMGWTFBBQ! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:57, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
- I think just a standard WTF?? is more appropriate. -- '"`UNIQ--postMath-00000006-QINU`"' 03:39, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Per above. --Scofield & Friends 09:49, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Shiny ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:01, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Mattsnow 10:54, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- This was is horrible.
1234 ~ 09:15, 28 January 2012
- "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy had some advice to offer on drunk: 'Get rid of it,' it said, 'and redirect to Inebriated'. " —The preceding unsigned comment was added by PuppyOnTheRadio (talk • contribs)
- Vomit. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:14, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete If I wanted to read lists, I would buy a book called "Lists" and then I would read it. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:28, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Great idea, poorly executed. -- 21:48, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Every article that has a family guy-picture, shall die. Including Family Guy itself. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 10:49 29 January 2012
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- This is bad. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:01, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Caroloates? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:59, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Yawn. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:51, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
- delete Mattsnow 10:54, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! This is plain unbearable. --Scofield & Friends 12:36, January 29, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. redirect to White folks Pup 08:06 27 Jan '12
- Ku Klux Klan isn't even spelled right. What a shame. Mattsnow 09:00, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Fail Its remarkable this one made it past its first week. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 09:06, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:51, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, Whitey! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:50, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Restored the first section that was heavily vandalized by an IP. The rest of it still sucks though. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 09:11, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (4) |
- A vital article, works as a placeholder. Besides, its got lots of shiny bulleted points.-- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 02:02, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Per Sisilikesims, word for word, word. Aleister 15:07 23-1-'12
- Technically not a vital article, although Firearm, Machine gun and Gunpowder are. Having said that, it's a short article, but not a stub (ie more than two paragraphs and an image.) Listy, but as per that above, bullet points are somewhat relevant here. And I got a laugh out of it, so keep-worthy. Pup 08:50 24 Jan '12
- To be honest, I want to see this on the front page. -- 06:29, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Quite possibly the most asinine stub ever. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:11, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
- This has no redeeming qualities other than being a vital article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 16:05, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Strong delete Whats so vital about this article? I mean just redirect to handgun as a placeholder if thats such a big issue. Its just a bunch of dot points with nothing interesting about them and whats funny about *************************
|
Comments |
- Well, I made it a bit better. By no means is it a good article, but if it's vital, heh heh, why not. For example, London is an article with a fix tag, yes, but as it's vital, let's just say that I specified non-true. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 19:42, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Kinda a two-trick pony: bullet-lists and bullet-puns. I wish it had Jimmy Cagney in it, shouting "Made it, Ma! Toppa the woild!" before exploding. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 12:56 (UTC)
- Kept by people voting keep.
1234 ~ 07:14, 27 January 2012
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Burn with fire. Mattsnow 11:42, January 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Ewww. A chav-hating chav! I'm amazed. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 12:05 (UTC)
- Bad, bad, bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:07, January 25, 2012 (UTC)
- I killed a chav once, but that is my birthright. Aleister 13:34 25-1-'12
- Borderline UN:CM Pup 01:40 25 Jan '12
- Sigh EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:25, January 25, 2012 (UTC)
- 7 delete votes? I see nothing good about this ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:23, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (2) |
- Should be sent to the Moon - not funny, badly edited article with no pictures. nothing worth saving Sir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 13:33, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Although a Vital article, saving this even as a placeholder for colonization or another major collab would do great damage to both uncyclopedia and wikia, and to the innernests in general. Aleister 13:43 26-1-'12
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. Trite is a good writer. Maybe he should stick to more "mainstream" concepts though. Mattsnow 05:41, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Does try too hard, but is hardly deletable -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 07:47, January 26, 2012
- Not deletable, and actually a very good article, although it shouldn't have been on the main page (hardly understandable if you don't know the songs). A very good example of song titles and song words put together on a page is Maxwell Edison, which with a little editing can be featurable. It's got to tell a readable story to a non-fan to work well. Aleister 8:07 26-1-'12
- Keep. I see nothing wrong with it. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:26, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:07, 26 January 2012
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. If you don't know that this is an attempt to create a story using the titles of They Might Be Giants songs this looks like a pile of random arglebargle. If you do recognize that it's a news article that inserts They Might Be Giants songs into sentences it's still pretty fucking retarded.--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:00, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you feel that way. I did try to make it funny. -Tritefantastic 05:18, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
- It reads like a school assignment where your teacher made you compose a story using a list of arbitrary vocabulary words. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:20, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Upon closer inspection, date of creation does not fit criteria for deletion. You oughta know better, Monkey. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:58, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (1) |
- Seems nice enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:06, 21 January 2012
|
Delete (4) |
- Another dead-end text adventure with too many grues. Pup 05:19 21 Jan '12
- Does nothing, goes nowhere, eats cow.
1234 ~ 06:35, 21 January 2012
- Good god. How many of these Zork parodies are there? I demand a parody of Telengard! - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 10:04, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
- This is stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:30, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I wanna hate this, but I can't. The joke is, no matter what path you take, you die. It's like a Cohen brothers movie. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 13:06 (UTC)
- Kept; apathy or something.
1234 ~ 15:39, 25 January 2012
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- De1337 Pup 08:53 24 Jan '12
- h8 (h@\/5. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 16:00, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. You could have at least remembered to put up the VFD tag. --Scofield & Friends 16:26, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
- After having been on this site for ~6 months, I actually know what a chav is. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 12:13 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Do I point out when you do the wrong thing Scofield? (Please note question is rhetorical.) Pup 01:37 25 Jan '12
- Ha! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! /pumps fist ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 13:41 (UTC)
- I'm going to have to teach you the meaning of rhetorical, aren't I? Pup 01:47 25 Jan '12
- Ha! FIGHT! FIGHT! FIGHT! Wait, that was a rhetorical question again, wasn't it? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:53, 25 January 2012
- I'm trying to think of what they call it when you have a yes/no question but answering either way could be misconstrued. You know what I mean, don't you? Pup 02:01 25 Jan '12
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- I was about to ICU this article, then I checked the revision history. The article was created by an IP (I think it was in 2010?), and revision history shows no good revisions. Formatting is sub-par; the photos are properly thumbnailed, sections divided (albeit some poorly) , et cetera..., However, the tone is, generally, unencyclopedic (and not the good kind...), and I'm assuming only twelve-year-olds would find this funny, based upon the sarcastic and profanity laced rant about "n00b guns..." --Gamma287 21:59, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
- I maed a yuky Call of Duty -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:23, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
- I stopped reading after "Chuck Norris". Then I started reading again a moment later, but I stopped again after "Fucking Noob-Ass Cheap Guns". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 12:16 (UTC)
- enough chances Pup 01:35 25 Jan '12
|
Comments |
- Might be redeemable. If no-one volunteers to fix it, consider me a vote for delete though. Pup 08:56 24 Jan '12
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- This is bad. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:47, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Blah. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:32, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Pointless and dull. Pup 08:51 24 Jan '12
- ?????????--fcukman
LOOS3R! 08:53, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Per POTR. --Scofield & Friends 16:23, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Excellent, yet another attempt at humour, by being as unfunny as possible. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 20:24, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (2) |
- Strongest possible keep. This is very dear. It is the past, present and future of all thing bat fuck.
1234 ~ 01:37, 22 January 2012
- Zim! This is Zim's masterpiece and signature page here, and it's also funny, which is a plus. Aleister 11:40 22-1-'12
- p.s. Invalid nom, see comment section
|
Delete (5) |
- 2008cruft. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 22:12, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
- It reads like it has been translated from somewhere else. I'm assuming it's english Bad just. Pup 12:20 22 Jan '12
- Seriously, this does not sound like proper English. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:31, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Do, doo, do do doo do huh? Um, yeah Delete. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:52, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
- I get that some people like this, but I didn't laugh oncet, and ...uh... "funny" is paramount, right? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Jan 25 '12 13:19 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- If this hyena burns to death, can I have a Userspace copy? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 02:27, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Invalid nom, no VFD template placed. This is obviously a miracle of Zim buddhism, and should be venerated as such And I just read the page four times, and after awhile the narrative took form and things emerged from the prose to form a pattern. Me scared, but me no pray to God no more, as that would be folly. Anyway, an interesting page. Aleister 13:30 25-1-'12
- Yup.
1234 ~ 15:22, 25 January 2012
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (4) |
- Quite clever and well formatted. Follow the links and you end up in some interesting places. Aleister 5:14 21-1-'12
- Agree with above. This is actually pretty good. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 10:00, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
- One of the better games. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:27, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Better than the shovelware ones at the Game page we used to have. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill | 07:44, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Not a very good game is it? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:02, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Old in-joke. Don't dislike it enough to delete it though. Pup 05:10 21 Jan '12
- It would be fine in mainspace, but aren't games, yah know, meant to be games? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:13, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
- You do remember what site you are on, don't you? Pup 05:20 21 Jan '12
- Kept.
1234 ~ 00:53, 25 January 2012
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- I actually rather like this one. Granted, I may have just gone in the wrong direction with it...
1234 ~ 04:56, 21 January 2012
- I like this one alot, one of the only games I've ever played here. I added some of the pics, and each of the pages could have interesting pics on them. Pretty well written and nice clean boxes too, along with the pics. Made me laugh when I first came across it. Aleister 5:06 21-1-'12
- Against.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 12:17, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Kill More gamecruft. About 50 pages of staring and decomposition, if anyone is curious. Pup 04:48 21 Jan '12
- Random + Game ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:07, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Fucking stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:14, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. There. I fixed it. --Scofield & Friends 17:36, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Scofield! Aleister 2:49 21-1-'12
- Not bad enough for deletion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:36, 21 January 2012
- Keep. What Socky said. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 07:13, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- ZOMG 1337 h4x0r5 maek me sad ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:52, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
1 h4t3 1337 5h1t. Pup 06:59 20 Jan '12
- Go on, fix this. I dare you. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:50, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:02, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- 1337 h4x, N199@!-- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:30, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- This is fixed?
1234 ~ 04:37, 21 January 2012
- Delete. What is this all about? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:13, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Not good, but not bad enough for deletion. Pup 10:31 21 Jan '12
- Voting "Keep" means "not bad enough for deletion." --Scofield & Friends 14:05, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
- I meant more it went from bleargh to meh. Pup 12:22 22 Jan '12
- Added some more content to it. Definitely seems keepable to me now. --Scofield & Friends 14:31, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Kept; no consensus.
1234 ~ 00:54, 25 January 2012
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 07:02, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- No and Fuck You -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 08:32, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- This is Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens' masterpiece. It made me laugh. We need some of these types to stick around for the duration, so why not this one? Lord Fluffy! Aleister 00:31 20-1-'12
- Okay then... --Gamma287 02:27, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- PHNURR!....and you were expecting what exactly? -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 07:14, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Deport to IIllogicopedia ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:32, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Deport to hell. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:21, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- lakfhe eipanfieop aepfhaiofhif xvmieenvi euiehaiufa 99999999999999999999 eeakeaoeifa doody. Yay! I wrote an article! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:34, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I dunno, but I just looked at it again and starting lol immediately. Something about how the page is arranged, or maybe just that extra dimension of weirdness accidently captured just right to be funny. At least to me. And it seems to be the best article of a former user who put lots of work into it. But most of all, lol. Aleister 3:50 20-1-'12
1234 ~ 00:55, 25 January 2012
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (7) |
- Why?????--fcukman
LOOS3R! 07:18, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Article in the style of. Pup 08:46 19 Jan '12
- Several lol's just now, I've never seen this. Aleister 10:13 19-1-'12
- Keep. see above comment --'"`UNIQ--postMath-00000008-QINU`"' 04:44, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Fixed by an anonymous entity. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:26, 21 January 2012
- Keep. the fixed version. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 07:10, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
- *Sigh* because Aleister bugged me. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:36, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (8) |
- Delete Super unoriginal, tl;dr, random and unfunny ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:29, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:18, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Kill and redirect to the featured Illogic page -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 08:43, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Articles written in the style of still have to be funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:29, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
hate haet hat EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:47, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- ...WITH SAVINGS!!! -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:59, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- What in the buckets is that?
1234 ~ 04:17, 21 January 2012
- Pointless --Scofield & Friends 17:35, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Style over substance in as much as there's no substance and the style made me punch a horse. Yes, a horse. Not a nice horse, but a horse.mAttlobster. (hello) 23:40, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'm still delete, we don't need any more main page parodies :) ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:31, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Give it 6 months, one every 6 months isn't too bad. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 07:09, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
1234 ~ 00:55, 25 January 2012
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- I had some of the credit of writing this game. Don't delete it. are you guys happy if all of uncyclopedia's articles get huffed?--fcukman
LOOS3R! 09:52, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Only the shit ones. Pup 10:25 21 Jan '12
- So every article in uncyclopedia is shit then. LOL--fcukman
LOOS3R! 13:07, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
- C'mon, MrEx, there are 5,000 really shit articles on Uncyclopedia, just waiting to be deleted. Find them. And then nominate them! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Jan 21 '12 14:03 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- Though slightly better written, this one is, like its predecessor, another crufty, unfunny pile of subpages that don't go anywhere.
1234 ~ 04:12, 21 January 2012
- Shite is still shite when it has a sequel. Pup 04:14 21 Jan '12
- Eh, not so good. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:12, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Meh EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:49, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:01, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- This was previously kept in the hopes that its creator would improve upon it, but a year later it is still unfunny cruft that goes nowhere.
1234 ~ 04:08, 21 January 2012
- The creator expanded it. It's like the difference between a partially full and a burst colostomy bag Pup 04:14 21 Jan '12
- My headed asploded. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:08, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
- We need less of this. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:49, January 23, 2012 (UTC)
- It's a game for a start but yeah it sucks also. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:32, January 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
This, and it's sequel, is kind of like dandruff. I don't like it, it's just I can't really care enough to hate it. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 10:09, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Somehow this escaped deletion the last time... but yeah, it's bad.
1234 ~ 02:58, 21 January 2012
- There was also a Game:Escape and somehow one survived and the other didn't Pup 04:14 21 Jan '12
- Stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:00, January 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:20, January 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (6) |
- Keep. I rewrote the intro, and I think its a little better now. It helps explain to new Uncyclopedians what we mean by listcruft. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 07:23, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- per Simsilikesims. If I had more time I'd make a list of why this should be kept, But I've got four more episodes of "Big Love" and miles to go before I sleep. Aleister 13:07 17-1-'12
- Keep per irony Pup 01:18 17 Jan '12
- whuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut!?! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:07, 18 January 2012
- WTF????????--fcukman
LOOS3R! 06:56, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Informational to n00bs and funny in its stupidity. --'"`UNIQ--postMath-00000009-QINU`"' 04:54, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Cool sotry bro ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:02, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:21, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Fuckit hard. Super unoriginal and unfunny in its intentional unoriginality. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:03, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Say whuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuut!?! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:52, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 04:16, 21 January 2012
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Right....... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:40, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Gay, and fruit. Aleister 3:48 20-1-'12
- Using the word "gay", "gays" or "gayness" 6 times in the first paragraph makes it hilarious right? Wrong! -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:06, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Badly executed, which is a shame. Concept could have been executed much better. Pup 06:57 20 Jan '12
- Delete. Strangely homophobic too. --Scofield & Friends 17:40, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:02, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Wow, he called a tree "gay." That's the funniest thing EVER!!!!!! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:27, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (5) |
- I'm rewriting this. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:38, 17 January 2012
- Socky Aleister 13:09 17-1-'12
- Let's see what Socky turns it into. I like it so far. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:51, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- keep Some IP just saved it. Mattsnow 02:12, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
- errr no, he actually reverted it to a prior version, but it ain't that bad my brotha! Mattsnow 02:15, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep per Socky's rewritten version. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 05:27, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Nobody cares ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:00, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. NRV Pup 10:25 16 Jan '12
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:31, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
crab cake. This article is a laughable furry that burninates watermelon! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:51, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
Redirect to Special:Random -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:49, January 17, 2012 (UTC) I like Socky's version. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 05:26, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Fuckit -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:03, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- : [ —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:04, 17 January 2012
|
Comments |
If huffed, a sad state of affairs, it looks like a user page for Socky who has started to work this one into a masserpiece. A great start and the potential is potentiallucious. I almost used that god pic yesterday too. Aleister 22:31 17-1-'12
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (1) |
- i also want to delete this, but I want to swim against the flow. Pup 07:00 20 Jan '12
|
Delete (8) |
- Can we also deport this to Illogicopedia ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:34, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. 'Barf' water. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:20, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Funny in '05 -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 08:31, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- 1905 maybe. Aleister 10:15 19-1-'12
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:16, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- GAAAH! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:36, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- THYME TO
FLAP FALP MAH ARMAS!!!1! Dang that article was retarded... --Gamma287 02:30, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
- ARRRGH -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 03:56, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -6
|
Keep (8) |
- Because Frosty has no idea what an injoke actually is and VI needs to smack him upside the head. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 08:32, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- I like it. Pup 09:18 19 Jan '12
- Frosty's nomination aren't funny. Aleister 10:09 19-1-'12
- Just move it to a better title. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:15, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- "content isn't necessary" -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:17, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:46, 19 January 2012
- I laughed. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:31, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- All Jack and no work makes dull a play boy. I dunno', but I'm voting keep. Twas' quite humorous, even if it was a bit short... --Gamma287 02:33, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Injoke, intensional bad, looking like whats about or not. I hate seeing bullshit like this being allowed to exist and people like me being told they aren't funny when they actually TRY and make an article. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:30, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- I presume all these "intentionally bad" jokes exist because people no longer know how to do good ones. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 16:29, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (7) |
- !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:09, 17 January 2012
- I have nothing original to add. Aleister 13:00 17-1-'12
- I have nothing original to add. PuppyOnTheRadio 13:01 17-1-'12
- If we're gonna burn all the "intentionally bad" articles, we should keep this one. It's neat and works on so many levels. Well, two. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:16, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Me likey likey boom boom. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:58, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- WTF is happening?--fcukman
LOOS3R! 07:18, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Erm, this is, how you say "Purdy good." --Gamma287 02:25, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- ?????????????????????? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:09, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:21, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Unoriginally unfunny. Not bad enough to keep. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:23, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Not bad enough to keep? Is that a contradiction of some kind? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:54, 20 January 2012
|
Comments |
- I'm with the "kill" voters, but I think this would make a funny article if it weren't so ...unimaginative. Did anybody other than me know that Shakespeare, Herman Melville and Martin Luther King Jr. had one thing in common? I'll tell you what it is, before you all go scrambling over to Wikipedia and spend the rest of your day drawing Venn diagrams: they were all tremendous plagiarists. What's plagiarism? It's the last refuge of the unoriginal mind. My point is, why did no one think of that angle? How 'bout an article that's a parody of Romeo and Juliet, Israel Potter and Moby-Dick, and the I Have a Dream speech? And maybe throw in some CSI:Crime Scene Investigation and Lady Gaga? You people astound me with your banality.
You'd all make great plagiarists, though! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Jan 19 '12 9:56 (UTC)
- My god, a user who actually knows about the plagerized "I have a dream" speech. If only Prathia Hall were still alive to see this. Aleister 20:31 19-1-'12
- Kept again. Also, I'm sure that if you rewrite it with a solid bit (sounds like you got a good angle) Bizzee, you should have no problem replacing what's already there. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 07:57, January 20, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- the fuck? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:11, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
- LFLHSLDOIHWLELWEMWOFNIWEBQPEMZXOIPHWEPIWelkehfpihiuobeaipeh9932u98498543h98h78w0qh0qjweq90ej90jq90etyu098e49q0ewjjoiajdsaoudhoiusopsdad///a;d,a//aoa,,>????pfaqoipewaj!!!!!!!!!!!... ...Sorry, I don't know what that was. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:10, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Cruft. Pup 10:30 18 Jan '12
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 07:03, January 19, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Yeah whatever ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:06, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:21, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:38, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to the in jokes page, whatever that link is. Pup 01:22 17 Jan '12
- Fuckit -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:03, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Too cliche... -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:55, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- How about we destroy this? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 23:38, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Per Wilytank. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:52, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:21, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Redirect this list to Zombiebaron's user page. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:32, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Del Pup 07:21 17 Jan '12
- Fuckit -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:03, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Yeah lame. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:57, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- This has potential to be funny, except it sucks. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:17, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. NRV Pup 10:25 16 Jan '12
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:31, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:37, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Fuckit -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:03, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete per what Xamralco said. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:45, January 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Oh look another attempt at humor by making an article that looks like shit ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:55, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Boooooooooooooo!!!! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:15, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. NRV Pup 10:25 16 Jan '12
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:31, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:38, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Fuckit -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:03, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Nobody cares. This is shitty vandalism that fails in every way possible. Fuck being intentionally bad, it will never take the place of ACTUAL humor. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:52, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- That fake pee review is accurate. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:12, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. NRV Pup 10:25 16 Jan '12
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:31, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Fuckit -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:03, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Has something alright, but that something will be brought out in my userspace. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:11, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
WTF happened?--fcukmanLOOS3R! 06:15, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Incredibly random, pointless, not actually a game -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:40, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Actually... This is plagiarism, as most of it was stolen from here. No vote needed for that. -- 21:39, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Per deleting all games ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:50, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- I've actually played the real version of this game. It's really stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:02, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. NRV Pup 10:17 16 Jan '12
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:31, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (1) |
- If everybody is deleting good articles, let me delete the policies. can i?--fcukman
LOOS3R! 06:17, January 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- This page is hopeless imnho. I huffed large sections of it and it still lives with nothing to sustain it. Maybe redirect to the other MLK page, but that page is shit too, with the only good stuff being what remains from the wikipedia spork. Assassinate both pages and put up a placeholder might be the way to put this guy out of his misery. Aleister 00:44 16-1-'12
- We shouldn't have two articles on the same guy, and Martin Luther King is the better of the two. Pup 12:51 16 Jan '12
- Per Pup. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:42, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
- yeah the other one is much better -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:33, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It has some ideas that aren't too bad (Elvis killed Martin Luther King, Jayne Mansfield killed for her love of MLK etc) but marred by some ugyly stuff that isn't any good. Perhaps a combo of the good from this and the other MLK article? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:26, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (4) |
- An important topic, maybe even Vital. It's not that bad, esp. as a placeholder. I did some deletion,
blah rewrite, but it's maybe now presentable. The dog gif is funny. And stubs are OK, wikipedia probably has a million of them (literally), esp. as placeholders, although this is kind of a non-stub now. Aleister 00:33 14-1-'12
- Per that-ish -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 09:49, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Not a vital, but still important, and definitely not a stub. Pup 02:04 15 Jan '12
- Placeholder. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:27, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Random stub ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:56, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Blah. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:14, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- This is very lame ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:54, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAAHAHAHAAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!! AHAHAHAA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! --Oprah: She is mine, betch! 21:59, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAhAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:34, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I have personally stuck my dick in all 100 of these things without incident. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:02, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Most of them sound like fun. Pup 11:25 15 Jan '12
- Stupid... -- 02:35, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The compilation has a link to this article, which most likely crosses the line between humor and horror. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 08:46, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- This page reminds me of E.D's "offended" article. It gets worse as you scroll down, till you just want to puke.... - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 20:38, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh boy that isn't very funny -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:07, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Hu? --Roman Dog Bird 21:51, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Lame. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:52, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Animals that fucking explode rock!!!!! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:31, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- I have no idea what this is talking about, but even if I did the shoddy execution is inexcusable. This article can be summarized as: Incoherent nonsense, rant, list, list, rant and categories. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions Ban 16:11, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- <- This thing should be all over this article. I am disappoint. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:27, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. This was actually intended to be a parody of this manga, but given how awfully its written, I'm not surprised that nobody got it. --Scofield & Friends 17:19, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Remove the lists and randomness and there's no article left. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:30, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:30, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- DANG.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 05:12, January 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (6) |
- I'm learning stuff from "reading" the page. Educational at least. Iz trimmed a tiny bit of the lede to fix red link and make it more of a lede. Aleister 00:47 14-1-'12
- Athough it's certainly not featurable, I think my fixing-upping has made the page keepable at the least. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:43, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- You one sexy witch, Epic. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 15 '12 13:50 (UTC)
- Good page. Honestly could be improved still with a bit of formatting and a few minor changes, but worth keeping. Also would have 1337 as a redirect to this as well. Pup 01:57 15 Jan '12
- I'm here to ruin the party.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 15:04, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:20, 15 January 2012
|
Delete (3) |
- 2006 cruft that sucks in content and formatting ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:10, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
- lolololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololololol. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:56, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Ehhhhhhhhh. Probably our best "leet" article but does that really mean anything at all. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 09:47, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Persons, I am fixing this article(s). Please pay close attention and make sure I do not step on your pet cat(s). EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:38, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
- Carped; the score has spoked and the article has changen.
1234 ~ 03:08, 16 January 2012
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- To the ashbin of history Merge or redirect to Mohandas Gandhi, and let's build up that page. This one is blah to the blah extent, except one picture, which can be moved. Aleister 9:56 26-1-'12
- The first paragraph says it all. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:05, January 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Vital topic, so there should be only one good page on it. Pup 06:46 27 Jan '12
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:51, January 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:29, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. I did try to rewrite it, though. Maybe you can use whatever I did write to fix the other one up? --Scofield & Friends 14:28, January 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Well, maybe it's no that bad, but it is bad and needs work. Teams of horses could work on it and just muddy it up, but a team of writers may be able to bring some sense into this guy's life history. He never did want to be called Mahatma though, and disliked anyone using that. Then again, he didn't want to be called "pious midget grabby-hands destitute asshole" either, but plenty of Indian women did call him that, which made him bitter and revengeful. Aleister 13:50 26-1-'12
|