Uncyclopedia talk:Flammable's Office
This article was nominated for deletion on January 17, 2012.
The result of the discussion was you can't delete this.
|
|||
Go fart through a bagel. -- 19:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
- Must I? I was planning to top it with cream cheese.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 03:40, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Same thing...wait a second. How'd I get in here? --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:01, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
User:Unistyle[edit]
Perhaps you can put some sort of a restriction of User:Unistyle (see the talk page. He has proven that he can't be trusted uploading images, and I believe he should be monitored. But then again, I'm just an electrified caffeinated rat. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 18:08, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
- May I say I never uploaded a nude image AFTER I was warned. Unistyle 00:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Instated by:[edit]
Can I ask that if you make any changes to the "User restrictions:" you add your name to the the "Instated by:" section. As I understand it, Spang apparently changed the restrictions in the first section considerably, but his name does not appear as instating it. As an admin, I do believe he has his rights to instate "special rules", but he certainly should not do this in Hinoa's name under any circumstances. Additionally, many of these rules are decided upon after much deliberating and discussion, and should not just be altered as if they'd always been like that. It probably would be best to link to where the deciding took place, and to also list admins who agree with the rules, as consensus among admins that these rules are fair and reasonable is also key to their success in any form. Of course once we draft a new ruleset, all this may become obsolete, but I don't think it is unreasonable to ask this for now. --KATIE!! 23:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Would this not be a good place for the debate? It makes sense to keep the debate close at hand to the rules, methinks. Any problems with debating new rules here, and waiting until we get, I don't know, a half-dozen or so admins to put in at least an "I see the debate but I abstain" before we make changes? 12/5 23:24
- I don't really want to go through this again, but I suppose it's appropriate here. Hinoa was the one who extended the first rule list to add Some user, Hrodulf, Elvis, and me to the restrictions, and extended the rules themselves, with no evidence anywhere that this had even been discussed. It was apparently discussed with a couple of admins including tompkins (I think) on IRC, so unfortunately not evidence remains on that. I couldn't have known anything about that decision, not being in IRC at the time.
- So when I saw him add these, and saw that he'd only added people who were in favour of removing nin's name from the article, which was what we were discussing on that talk page, and the extra rules he added would have effectively shut off that discussion, from one side. So I just added the rest of the people who had been in the discussion or reverted the page without discussion. While doing so I removed the rule prohibiting moving the topic into the main forum because it was a community issue and most certainly not off topic. I was only attempting to balance a rule that to all intents and purposes looked like it had been implemented by hinoa alone, and was very one-sided.
- I did not think these extra rules would be in any way permanent, and I challenged their addition from the moment they were added. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 12:40, 6 Dec 2006
- Let me intervene, as someone else who uses this page with some degree of frequency and authority. I'm rolling all the edits of the past few days back to the last pre-"bullshit war" edit by Hinoa as of 17:25, 27/11/2006. I have no interest in the intricacies of the argument, nor am I prepared to engage in any other discussion about this action with anyone, save to say that if any admin disagrees with my action, they can alter the page again themselves and I'll take no further part in that particular section of it. All I'm trying to achieve by this is to restore things to how they were, since I'd like to think that I can retain a modicum of independence in this whole fucking mess. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
w00t[edit]
I'm impressed I didn't get a restriction. I already have about 10 images that have FAILED miserably on VFP. Well, not really. I have less. --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 07:30, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- That, and your signature pisses my eyes off. Better to be pissed off than pissed on I suppose. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:08, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Cookies,yum![edit]
Are there some sort of restrictions you can put on Cookies,yum!? He has shown poor judgement with his edits, especially after having two of his articles nominated to the VFD, in which he became very unfriendly towards Andorin Kato, blatantly violating rules on Uncyclopedia. He has also made some very questionable redirects. Though a good contributor at heart, he should probably be monitored for future disruptions. Also, he should learn to use the "Show preview" button. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:00, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Sure. The next time I have the urge to ban him, I'll make it diamond. Will that work? 06/12 00:03
- Also, I suspect ban evasion: Special:Contributions/74.69.147.123. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 00:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- He says he "forgot to sign in" for that, but... whatever. Also, he vandalized my userpage and pretended to be an admin. --Andorin Kato 00:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- He was blocked while making most of those edits. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 00:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I really do think this is a good idea. Cookies has been such an idiot. And if UNKNOWNFILE says this is Grue Army ganging up on a n00b, then ignore him. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 00:18, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- He was blocked while making most of those edits. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 00:17, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- He says he "forgot to sign in" for that, but... whatever. Also, he vandalized my userpage and pretended to be an admin. --Andorin Kato 00:15, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Also, I suspect ban evasion: Special:Contributions/74.69.147.123. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 00:05, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
I gave him a last piece of advice. Any other issues, drop a note on my talk page and I will start making cement shoes in his size. 06/12 00:21
- I think he wears size 7. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 00:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, he wears size 1. I think. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 00:23, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Cut me some slack! I was already banned from Wikipedia. Take a look at Wikipedia:User talk:74.69.147.123 if you don't believe I was banned. I'm not an "idiot" Hig Gen. Grue, I graduated from Harvard University. I know how to use the "show preview" button, it's right of the Save page button which I used over 500 times. Please, give me a break! The Cookie Monster [Spam Me]
- By "idiot", I mean "not a very good contributor." If you improve, i'm sureyou won't end up here. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 00:15, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- I generally assume "banned from Wikipedia" means "Needs to be banned from Uncyclopedia too". 06/13 01:01
- And on rare occasions, vice-versa. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- A Harvard grad was afraid to edit because his mother would find out? Riiiiight. --Andorin Kato 04:29, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Uggh, that was a joke that my mother would find out. You know how many people joke on Uncyclopedia. Honestly, I'm a Harvard grad, that can't be denied! --The Cookie Monster [Spam Me] 18:57, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't need to banned here to, I was already banned from Wikipedia. That will just honestly make me miserable. I haven't did anything wrong after the block expired yesterday. Take the advice of a Harvard Grad, not a 10 year old vandal like Andorin Kato who said it was his birthday the other day. I gave him a cake so he'd shut up, but it failed. --The Cookie Monster [Spam Me] 19:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I believe that Andorin Kato's a high-school student. Also, it's not the 10-year-olds thet vandalize wikis, it's the 12-year-olds. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 20:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Cookies, I TOLD YOU THAT IF YOU IMPROVE, YOU WILL BE FINE. But instead, you harass users, welcome IPs, and be a total idiot. Yes, you may be a grad, but your actions make you look 10. Andorin Kato is just doing his job. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 23:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Watch where you sling mud, eh? Famine set the 'restrictions'. Conversation ended. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:19, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Cookies, I TOLD YOU THAT IF YOU IMPROVE, YOU WILL BE FINE. But instead, you harass users, welcome IPs, and be a total idiot. Yes, you may be a grad, but your actions make you look 10. Andorin Kato is just doing his job. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 23:07, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, I believe that Andorin Kato's a high-school student. Also, it's not the 10-year-olds thet vandalize wikis, it's the 12-year-olds. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 20:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't need to banned here to, I was already banned from Wikipedia. That will just honestly make me miserable. I haven't did anything wrong after the block expired yesterday. Take the advice of a Harvard Grad, not a 10 year old vandal like Andorin Kato who said it was his birthday the other day. I gave him a cake so he'd shut up, but it failed. --The Cookie Monster [Spam Me] 19:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Java7837[edit]
I was wondering if you could set up parameters for this guy. Some of his "contributions" include, but are not limited to: spamming 240 pages with a lame category, Grue Killer (a blatant rip-off of Grue Slayer), putting Holocaust Tycoon (a featured article) on VFD, creating numerous talk pages with the text "i hate red links", and generally being a twat whenever he comes on IRC. -- 00:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Damn, these people are asking of the adding so many idiots to Flammable's office. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 00:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm such a trendsetter. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Well, there just happened to be a sudden influx of them. They're all out of the question for UGotM, too, due to banning parameters, so we can't express our distaste with them there. -- 00:37, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- What's next, EMC? Streaking? (Streaking is the rubbing of minerals onto a streak plate and marveling at the color it leaves.) --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 00:38, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I was actually thinking about running around naked...but this "streaking" sounds fun as well. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm such a trendsetter. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:36, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
On my shitlist as well. We'll see what his next move is when he comes back. 06/12 01:36
He's done something bad again. He moves Uncyclopedia Sucks to Wikipedia Sucks without any permission, forewarning, or reason. -- 02:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Those are userpages, BTW. At any rate, I've always considered the Office to be for people that if it were not for one thing they are doing wrong consistently would be perfectly OK editors. Java's been doing several different things wrong, and I don't think Office restrictions would help that any. Bans would be more effective. As things stand, I'll leave him a message on his talkpage. —Hinoa talk.kun 02:21, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, It's literally for anyone who needs particular attention for one reason or another. This includes, but is not limited to flagrant, repeated failures at rules, humor, conduct, etc. --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 02:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Kip the Dip[edit]
Could you set some type of restrictions on this guy? A lot of his contributions include creating stupid, pages and in the past had links in his sig to Special:Userlogout. Looking at the first link, you'll see he confessed to several types of vandalisim, and he has also been banned severeal times in the past few weeks--Sir Manforman 00:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think that editing mostly within one's own userspace constitutes a ban, but Kip has made some poor decisions. None of the vandalism he confessed to is major enough to requie special restrictions. Finally, Famine seems to be the only admin that has given this user a serious ban, and Famine has had similar disputes with other users, including Nintendorulez, you, and Hrodulf. Therefore, I don't think any of his actions warrant an entry in Flammable's office, but more supervision by the admins may be needed. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 01:05, August 26, 2007
Okay, I would like to request an entry. I need to prove I can be a good user. -- 00:23, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
Cajek?[edit]
Hey, where's my entry? I've done LOTS of evil things, gosh darnit! • <21:24 Jun 24, 2009>
- Your bannination is too obvious to be listed here. 21:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- This is one of those "serious pages" you've heard about. Silly things, like Cajek or <insert name here>, don't go here. Putting you here, frankly, would ruin the page's reputation. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:40, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- <mocking>Putting you here, frankly, would ruin the page's reputation.</mocking> • <21:43 Jun 24, 2009>
- There's no need for the wikicode. When talking about you, the mocking is pretty much a given. "Oh, you're so handsome" or "That was really smart" when said to you clearly mean something else than when they're said to someone who is, for example, not you. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- Is that your way of saying that you don't think I'm handsome? You rapscallion! • <21:58 Jun 24, 2009>
- Is this where I should have realized Modus has a problem with me? Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 00:14, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
- It's not just you. It's everybody that reads my first comment in this section. I'm out of control! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:32, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Is this where I should have realized Modus has a problem with me? Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 00:14, November 15, 2009 (UTC)
- Is that your way of saying that you don't think I'm handsome? You rapscallion! • <21:58 Jun 24, 2009>
- There's no need for the wikicode. When talking about you, the mocking is pretty much a given. "Oh, you're so handsome" or "That was really smart" when said to you clearly mean something else than when they're said to someone who is, for example, not you. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:47, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
- <mocking>Putting you here, frankly, would ruin the page's reputation.</mocking> • <21:43 Jun 24, 2009>
My name is not on here[edit]
Guess that's a good thing? I know I did some terrible thing (making too many forums and failing to complete pee reviews) but I guess thats nothing compared to what these guys did. And I prefer that my name nevers ends up here.--- 20:22, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
User:Chomu Sclavus[edit]
Additional statements were pending for over 5 years now. I used to be Chomu. Does anyone have new statements by now? Thanks. --70.179.174.101 09:04, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
- That depends really, if you're wanting to come back with the same account it would likely be with restrictions to ensure the same behaviour doesn't happen again. That said I was not here when you were blocked so cannot comment on it with much authority, try asking Zombiebaron or Mhaille. --ChiefjusticeXBox360 09:52, December 8, 2011 (UTC)
Protected edit request on 19 October 2022[edit]
This edit request has been answered. |
Request: Please add the shortcut UN:FLAMMABLE to the shortcuts list. Thank you.
Saddam Hussein (talk) 17:30, 19 October 2022 (UTC)