Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive258

This Page Was Written By A N00b

Score: 5
Keep (2)	Come on! It's cute! --Scofield & Friends 17:00, January 14, 2012 (UTC) Needs a badly formatted sig. at the bottom. --Gamma287 06:20, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Stupid does not equal funny. So please have a good rant about how we should keep stupid piles of shit, but it doesn't alter the fact that it couldn't even get a smile from me. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:05, January 13, 2012 (UTC) Thiz Shit fukin' suks balls! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:55, January 13, 2012 (UTC) Never allow people to write this stuff again -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:21, January 14, 2012 (UTC) Dump it on wikipedia's doorstep, knock and run. Aleister 00:44 14-1-'12 There is a place for this sort of thing. 1234 ~ 17:25, 14 January 2012 Not want -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 06:32, January 15, 2012 (UTC) Why do we need this? EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:00, January 15, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Hard On

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	This is absolute crap. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:56, January 13, 2012 (UTC) LOL PENORZ R SO FUNNEEE. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:03, January 13, 2012 (UTC) Crap absolute is this. Aleister 00:35 14-1-'12 Terrible. Enough stated. --Gamma287 01:05, January 14, 2012 (UTC) My Metapod is so hard! --Scofield & Friends 16:58, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Leon Trotsky

Score: -4
Keep (5)	You try to huff Trotsky! He escape many attempt, then they get him, lay him in grave. But the spirit of Trotsky lives today, in the youth, in the minds of the masses, in the very air we breath. Plus, it's a pretty good page with some clean-up and unlisting towards the end. Looks like a spork originally. Leon! Aleister 20:50 13-1-'12 Keep. A diamond in the rough - also a very major topic.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:57, January 13, 2012 (UTC) I'm only voting keep because Stalin was a terrible person... --Gamma287 01:07, January 14, 2012 (UTC) Because we need a Trotsky article and this isn't so terrible. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 12:59, January 14, 2012 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:02, 14 January 2012
Delete (1)	Fuck this. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:46, January 13, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept. 1234 ~ 06:24, 15 January 2012

Sister Dora

Score: 2
Keep (4)	So absurd it's hilarious. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:20, 9 January 2012 I liked the first paragraph, but "Three days later, as generals gathered in their masses, just like 'witches at black masses'" had me LOLing 4 reel. If I weren't a piece of shit, I'd try to expand it and add some images. Somebody with talent do this, please. --Roman Dog Bird 22:11, January 9, 2012 (UTC) These guys seem to like it, so who am I to stifle their laughter? Aleister 17:06 11-1-'12 KEEP Some great stuff here. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:01, January 14, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (6)	This is bad. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:52, January 9, 2012 (UTC) Keep in your userspace. I agree this is remarkable, certainly something, but is nothing that deserved to pop up on random page. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:45, January 10, 2012 (UTC) Per TKF. This is just plain stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:43, January 10, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Please god end this now.   Delete. Wacky War stuff never fails never to amuse. This doesn't remotely. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:47, January 11, 2012 (UTC) Delete. There once was a time when articles were funny because they contained actual jokes and made sense. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:32, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept; apathy and people voting keep. 1234 ~ 17:20, 14 January 2012

Pledge Drive

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Started years ago, didn't really go anywhere. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:08, January 11, 2012 (UTC) This has potential but it just came off as cliche. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:51, January 11, 2012 (UTC) Lame ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:31, January 12, 2012 (UTC) Kill, redirect to that article that's somewhat similar but a lot better but I can't remember its name right now -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:40, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Mormon pride

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Some unfunny paragraphs and then...lists. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:04, January 11, 2012 (UTC) Random, boring, and anything I can do to derail Mormon pride, just let me know. WTF? Mitt Romney? 17:09 11-1-'12 What Wilytank said. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:49, January 11, 2012 (UTC) tl;dr Listy and shit. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:32, January 12, 2012 (UTC) FUCK NO--fcukmanLOOS3R! 11:03, January 12, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

UnNews:NCR beats Legion at Hoover Damn

Score: 3
Keep (0)
Delete (3)	I just fail to see the funniness. Mattsnow 04:41, January 11, 2012 (UTC) I don't know if what Aleister said is true but this definitely qualifies for QVFD in my eyes. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:48, January 11, 2012 (UTC) Voting just in case, but this is more like vandalism and should be snuffed on sight. Aleister 21:39 11-1-'12
Comments	This is one I think you can just delete. Even though unnews is usually saved, something this bad can be just QVD'ed, imnho. Aleister 17:07 11-1-'12 Under 7 days, either ICU it or bring it to QVFD. In this case, I deleted it because what the fuck was that. But yeah. ICU or QVFD anything under 7 days old. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:19, January 11, 2012 (UTC)

Apple pie

Score: 6
Keep (0)
Delete (6)	Maybe it's just me, but aren't articles supposed to be funny or something? Jonny appleseed 00:06, January 10, 2012 (UTC) Very listy. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:38, January 10, 2012 (UTC) Crapple pie. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:46, January 10, 2012 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 03:20, January 11, 2012 (UTC) FUCK--fcukmanLOOS3R! 04:14, January 11, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Love,
Comments

Walsall Arboretum

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	The future: car parking -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:47, January 9, 2012 (UTC) Yawn. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:46, January 10, 2012 (UTC) This confuses me. 1234 ~ 19:29, 10 January 2012 Delete. FUCK FUCK FUCK.   Delete. Parked and abandoned with the alarm still going. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:45, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Mackenzie Bowell

Score: 4
Keep (2)	Weak keep. The article in it's present state is crap. The only thing that would encourage me to keep it is the fact that he's a personage of enough significance we should have an article on him. I'd keep on the proviso that it's ICU'd (with a bulldozer standing by) to see if someone wants to salvage it. Pup 07:33 09 Jan '12 James Monroe, as the fifth President of the United States and the propounder of the Monroe Doctrine, is far more significant. And yet...oh, hey, issat a red link? Gosh, it is. Fuck Mackenzie Bowell.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 9 '12 8:14 (UTC) I'd say John Curtain is more important than both. Doesn't make any of them unworthy of an article. Oooh - another red link. Pup 09:25 09 Jan '12 Did you mean Curtin? Oh, snap.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 9 '12 9:43 (UTC) I'd say Monroe is more significant, because he was a founding father of the U.S., and his doctrine would be invoked to shape (or meddle with) the history of Latin America for the better part of two centuries. But my point was, a crappy article about a less-significant politician shouldn't stick around if those other two guys are red links.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 9 '12 9:53 (UTC) Have you ever tried writing Curtin on a phone with spell check? And the point was significance is a matter of perspective. I've done a little reading on Bowell, and while I personally think he's a fairly minor figure from my perspective, he's actually interesting from the perspective of "Great failures of all time!" He deserves an article on here, but the one we have at present is a far cry short of what it should be. I'd be happier to see an article ICU'd to death than VFD'd when the topic is one that may attract readership. Amazingly though, I think I've managed to obtain more comedic material for this guy then the serious stuff on Wikipedia for him. And whoever wrote this - calling something the Mackenzie movement is a severe failing. After all, you wouldn't refer to the John movement when talking about Abbott. Okay, maybe you would, but you know what I mean. Pup 12:32 09 Jan '12 Lol. The BOWELL movement. ~ Captain Obvious ~ 12:37, January 9, 2012 (UTC) Ah, try Thomas Jefferson, Ronald Reagan, Chuck Berry, Little Richard, and a few thousand others. But if Puppy wants to keep this Keep. who am I to stand in his way. Aleister 12:39 9-1-'12
Delete (6)	2006cruft. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:28, January 8, 2012 (UTC) WTF? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:31, January 8, 2012 (UTC) How...in...why...who the...when? What...where.............WHO POISED THIS STEAMING TURD ON THE EDGE OF THE TOILET SEAT?  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 9 '12 6:26 (UTC) Rubbish, although I wouldn't be opposed to replacing all of those mentioned above (and this) with placeholders. 1234 ~ 19:31, 10 January 2012 Edited it down and then a little up to a little less rubbish. Now a fine placeholder, for a stein of beer if nothing else. Aleister 3:18 11-1-'12 DO NOT WANT   Still not laffin. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:17, January 11, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	If somebody adds a plethora of POOP and COLON jokes to this, I'll change my voet. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 9 '12 12:44 (UTC)

The Wrens

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Bandcruft. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:32, January 9, 2012 (UTC) super-sad delete. i love the wrens :( -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:15, January 9, 2012 (UTC) Never heard of 'em. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:21, 9 January 2012 New Jersey?! Pee-yew! --Roman Dog Bird 22:13, January 9, 2012 (UTC) Ker-kill. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:45, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Got me thinking about WRNS. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:18, January 10, 2012 (UTC)

Love Island

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	No love! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:14, January 9, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:32, January 9, 2012 (UTC) killPup 10:19 09 Jan '12 Yeah, it's bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:44, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Leo Laporte

Score: 6
Keep (0)
Delete (6)	No. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 9 '12 11:47 (UTC) Delete Leo, you are such a troll — screw you! I'm not kidding, screw you, you asshole. Screw you. Pup 12:38 09 Jan '12 Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:15, January 9, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:32, January 9, 2012 (UTC) This is bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:01, January 9, 2012 (UTC) Shit of the worst order. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:22, January 9, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid

Score: -5
Keep (7)	REWRITE. No, I'm actually serious pages like this and the in-jokes list really need updating. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 10:59, January 8, 2012 (UTC) Don't delete chief's userpage!--fcukmanLOOS3R! 11:08, January 8, 2012 (UTC) Yawn. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 13:06, January 8, 2012 (UTC) I agree that much of our "New User Literature" needs a rewrite. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:46, January 8, 2012 (UTC) Conditional keep. Replace the page with "Be Xamralco" and it will be ready. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:02, January 8, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Per above. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:23, 8 January 2012 Keep. For safety's sake. 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:23, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Per Mr-ex777 Pup 08:15 08 Jan '12 Per deleting everything ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:17, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	I believe voting for deletion here is tantamount to asking for a ban, btw. Pup 08:19 08 Jan '12 I propose we ban MrEx777, and then delete him. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 10:20 (UTC) Kept. 1234 ~ 19:27, 10 January 2012

Cyan

Score: 0
Keep (6)	Keep. Too interesting for me to pass by without speaking up. Up! Aleister 00:00 Russian Christmas '12 Keep This is cyan. Will you lot chill the fuck out. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:02, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Keep Ah, cyan. I remember the days when a prank in the computer lab was to change the screen background or cursor to this color. That gives me an idea...see below. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:01, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Cyan. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 04:28, 7 January 2012 Oooooooh I like this one -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 08:16, January 8, 2012 (UTC) Cyan Pup 07:27 09 Jan '12
Delete (6)	Eh? 1234 ~ 20:34, 6 January 2012 Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:36, January 6, 2012 (UTC) My eyes! The goggles do nothing! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:06, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Futile delete I hate injokes and pages that look like the things they are about. How about some real comedy guys. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:41, January 7, 2012 (UTC) What Frosty said.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 1:33 (UTC) Delete. Rendering an article unreadable is basically doing this. 2K12_DAN.VRS 00:27, January 10, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	This article would be easier to read with a black background. I'd do it myself but don't remember the coding to do it. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:07, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Who needs to read it? Iz just interesting as is. Scrambles my brain cells to a new height of cyan frenzy. Aleister 17:33 Russian Christmas '12 Kept; no consensus. 1234 ~ 19:28, 10 January 2012

User:ChiefjusticeDS

Score: 2
Keep (4)	Keep For the principle of the thing. Only users and admins delete user pages. Also, its a pretty color. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:58, January 7, 2012 (UTC) If this was deleted, delete HTBFANJS. Crappy articles for the win!--fcukmanLOOS3R! 07:57, January 8, 2012 (UTC) Lovely. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:22, 8 January 2012 The only user page which gives mine a run for its money. Frosty did a fantastic job designing it. I have no idea why he wants to delete it now.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 9 '12 6:15 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Delete After a spirited debate on IRC as to whether I'd get banned for this, I decided to do it for the greater good. This is also not very funny and he smells funny. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:56, January 7, 2012 (UTC) i h8 him --CheifJusticeH8ter4000 01:13, January 8, 2012 (UTC) he voted to delete my sig, I think -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:52, January 8, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Per TKF Pup 07:55 08 Jan '12 Redirect to User:Zombiebaron. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:44, January 8, 2012 (UTC) Too much pink. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 19:46, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Needs more mince pies. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:03, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

We've Gotta be Meowed

Score: 6
Keep (0)
Delete (6)	delete Mattsnow 22:54, January 7, 2012 (UTC) We've Gotta Delete This. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 23:20, January 7, 2012 (UTC) We don't need this. CenterBack (talk) 11:10, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Where's the humor? -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 00:12, January 8, 2012 (UTC) Bad, bad, bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:41, January 8, 2012 (UTC) YOGER????????--fcukmanLOOS3R! 06:18, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Awww, almost makes me sad: "Don't delete any page of mine please or i will be freaking out about the fact that vote for deletion is bad bad bad bad bad bad--202.7.216.98 01:53, January 8, 2012 (UTC)"  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 9 '12 6:24 (UTC)

Recent Changes

Score: -1
Keep (2)	HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:46, January 8, 2012 (UTC) k the joke is ruined now
Delete (1)	DELETE FUCKING EVERYTHING???????--fcukmanLOOS3R! 09:42, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	yep -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:48, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Magictology

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	A very big mess. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:53, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Per Wilytank. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:22, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:25, January 7, 2012 (UTC) A parody of Scientology? And people chew my ass for beating jokes into the ground.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 1:21 (UTC) A lot of work to go nowhere fast. Zooooooommmmmm. Aleister 4:21 Russian Boxing Day '12
Comments

UnBooks:Twilight

Score: 6
Keep (0)
Delete (6)	Is... is this supposed to be intentionally bad? EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:20, January 7, 2012 (UTC) yes --Roman Dog Bird 17:28, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:36, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Kristen Stewart ate my penis. It was boring. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:33, January 7, 2012 (UTC) And I thought the actual Twilight book was bad... -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:20, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Ughhhhh poop ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:09, January 7, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Shannon Hoon

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Not good. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:33, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Yes. 1234 ~ 20:38, 6 January 2012 Crap. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:57, January 6, 2012 (UTC)  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 1:24 (UTC)
Comments

Violet

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	This confuses me. 1234 ~ 20:32, 6 January 2012 Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:35, January 6, 2012 (UTC) It's purty. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:56, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Let's give Violet the gift of violence. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:40, January 7, 2012 (UTC) No more shall this page be inviolate! Gang violins shall strike it. And the pizzicato shall be wondrous to hear.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 0:30 (UTC)
Comments	The last section is completely unnecessary. Unfortunately, without it, the article is pitifully short. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:36, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

The Mark Latham Diaries

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	This is the opposite of good. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:45, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Damn it, so much potential in the title. Too bad it sucks. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:17, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Whuh? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:36, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Per Xamralco. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:20, January 7, 2012 (UTC) "Mark Latham sucks sucks sucks. Other men he fucks fucks fucks. Hey, I'm so funny they should pay me bucks bucks bucks. LIKE A BAWSS."  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 1:17 (UTC)
Comments

Amalgam

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	A bad article. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:39, January 7, 2012 (UTC) You can stick any categorical noun in front of "cruft" and have a new type of cruft. Fashioncruft. Vehiclecruft. Chemistrycruft. Maybe it would be better if we just referred to this as "shit". EpicAwesomeness (talk) 10:54, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Shitcruft. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:35, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Huh? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:44, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Dental amalgam (used for fillings) actually contains mercury. That's ball-shrivelling. And yet, this butterfingered article completely fumbles the idea. Also, God, Spock and Tom Cruise. For shame.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 1:12 (UTC)
Comments

Still life

Score: -4
Keep (6)	ADDED IMAGES AND SHIT. IS IT OK NOW? EpicAwesomeness (talk) 10:52, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Not bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:34, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Keep I like the pictures. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:26, January 7, 2012 (UTC) A save! Aleister 17:38 commiexmas '12 Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:05, 7 January 2012 I can't tell if it's funny, because my brain fell out last night and I can't find it. But the article certainly is beautiful now.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 1:02 (UTC)
Delete (2)	This is bad ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:06, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:09, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticeWii 13:02, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Bipolar disorder

Score: 5
Keep (3)	Keep. - On second thought, it's not that bad.. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 04:15, Jan. 8, 2012 Keep - Keep this mother! -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 04:15, Jan. 8, 2012 OMG - Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep Keep. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 04:15, Jan. 8, 2012
Delete (8)	Hackneyed, poorly made article about some unfunny unfunniness or another -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:04, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:09, January 6, 2012 (UTC) What TKF said. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:32, January 7, 2012 (UTC) What the X-Man said.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 1:37 (UTC) Delete. - It's crap. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 04:15, Jan. 8, 2012 Delete - No, no, it's sucks. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 04:15, Jan. 8, 2012 Delete. - DESTORY THIS BULLSHIT!!!! -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 04:15, Jan. 8, 2012 Die already -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 04:15, Jan. 8, 2012
Comments	Suggestion. Redirect this to Bipolar bear. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:28, 6 January 2012 I had in mind a bi-disambiguation to Bipolar bear and Bipolar Girl -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:33, January 6, 2012 (UTC) I kinda liked the "Bipolar Express" idea. Somebody do something with that, please.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 1:37 (UTC) Ok, somebody give Kip an award for his votes. I laughed for 30 seconds straight.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 5:18 (UTC) Kip, I love you and hate you, in all the best and worst ways possible. Also, deleted and redirected. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:24, January 8, 2012 (UTC)

Berserk (anime)

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Not a good article. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:58, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Omgwfttheyarealldeadomgdemonsdeathbloodgriffithkillseveryonelolomgcascagetsrapeddemonsoffergriffithimortalityloldeusexmachinagutsgetsagunarm -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:08, January 6, 2012 (UTC) "The ending of Berserk can not be said. It defies description. Therefore a word must be made up." Yeah, lines like that are pretty much article suicide. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:39, January 7, 2012 (UTC) I read this article. Now I am .  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 8 '12 1:31 (UTC)
Comments

Madhatter Project

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	This is bad. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:38, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Sigh. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:07, January 6, 2012 (UTC) It has all this potentially fun random stuff, but does absolutely squat to pull any of it together. Such a shame. 1234 ~ 21:13, 6 January 2012 kill it -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:23, January 8, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Black

Score: 8
Keep (0)
Delete (8)	That's annoying. Doesn't appear to be funny, either. 1234 ~ 20:31, 6 January 2012 Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:35, January 6, 2012 (UTC) The only thing that even comes close to humor is the caption for the first picture and the censor stuff is just too annoying. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:53, January 6, 2012 (UTC) *yawn* lame. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:46, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Redirect to that Birmingham Niggers page. Aleister 00:01 Russian Christmas '12 It would be ironic if this page had a black background with white text. However, the text involved really should have better jokes than this one does. Archiving to my userspace to mess with...someday. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:14, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Really really stupid, even for my standards. {{--CenterBack 04:33, January 7, 2012 (UTC)}} You can only go so far with the "it's one of the colour* pages!" excuse. Let's just bulldoze this and start afresh. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:07, January 7, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Suck on it EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:07, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Ernest Borgnine

Score: 6
Keep (0)
Delete (6)	No laughs. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:27, January 6, 2012 (UTC) This tells me nothing. Since I've never heard of the guy before, that's a problem. 1234 ~ 20:37, 6 January 2012 I have heard of this guy before, but the article still sucks. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:50, January 6, 2012 (UTC) Is he still alive? And his wife too, I know someone who watches QVC and she, Tova, used to come on with about a pound of make-up, and once you could see thru it and there was this lizard-like thing inside. She's almost 100 I think, Ernie too? Aleister 00:03 Commie Christmas '12 He apparently has won Golden Globes and Emmys, but this article just doesn't highlight his accomplishments, and looks about half done. Which is sad, since its been around since 2007 or earlier. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:30, January 7, 2012 (UTC) Rarely have I seen an Uncyclopedia vote go so smoothly. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:04, January 7, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Comment: The Borg rules, you cunts. --Roman Dog Bird 05:07, January 7, 2012 (UTC) True, but the article doesn't. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:04, January 7, 2012 (UTC)

Berillium

Score: -1
Keep (4)	It's alright. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:58, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:14, January 4, 2012 (UTC) Keep Mattsnow 14:51, January 4, 2012 (UTC) Keep Fucking sucks? So polish it like a diamond or a river rock. Aleister 16:35 6-1-'12
Delete (3)	My first article, and it fucking sucks. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) It's just too cliche, that's all. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:27, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:52, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept; no consensus. 1234 ~ 19:35, 6 January 2012

Bromine

Score: 2
Keep (1)	#The first delete comment violates Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid#The "@#$%^&*" Rule: Being Crass or Tasteless Doesn't Automatically Make Everything Funny even though the article about Bromine does not. --Jushafink ( A big fail of this policy on Uncyclopedia) 04:35, January 2, 2012 (UTC) This vote is stricken from the record, due to the user being a fucking douche with a dick up his ass. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:49, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Also counterproductive keep. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:49, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)	What is this shit? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Blah. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:24, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:52, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept; apathy. 1234 ~ 19:36, 6 January 2012

Helium

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. Not that bad, nice little article.--Sycamore (Talk) 14:31, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (5)	More element cruft. Besides being o grossly inaccurate that it can't possibly be funny, its also ugly as fuck ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Meant to vote against this one. Yeah delete this one. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:51, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Not that bad... but bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:21, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:52, January 4, 2012 (UTC) Kill switch This one is bad, and nobody is coming to its rescue, not even for a general cleanup. Burst this bubble. Aleister 16:39 6-1-'12
Comments	If this article goes, it should be protected, as it is a notable subject. A worse article could easily be written by a team of IP's high on helium. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 09:25, January 2, 2012 (UTC)

Lithium

Score: -1
Keep (4)	Keep. At least they got the Nirvana reference in. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:03, January 2, 2012 (UTC) I never visited the VFD page before. Therefore god has sent me to save the page. Also, playing on the bipolar disorder seems to be workable, though it is admittedly lacking direction at the moment. --Ajhuncyc 05:11, January 3, 2012 (UTC) God sent Ajhuncyc A bipolar page lacking direction - pages that look like the things they're about. Then there's Bipolar Girl. I've said too much, must be the lith wearing off. Aleister 21:20 3-1-'12 Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:15, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Element cruft ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) I'm surprised this is a Colonized article. Usually, they're better than this. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:17, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:49, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Not just an element, but actually a medication commonly prescribed for bipolar disorder, yet also commonly used in batteries. More notable a subject than you might think. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 09:02, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Kept; no consensus. 1234 ~ 19:36, 6 January 2012

Neodymium

Score: 3
Keep (0)
Delete (3)	Yawn ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) It's sad that I actually know what neodymium is, but it's even more sad that I had to read this article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:14, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:52, January 4, 2012 (UTC) Dear god this is horrible i can barely stand to look at it Mister Victim (talk) 19:40, January 6, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Major Contributions of Those of African Descent to the Realms of Philosophy, Science, Literature, and the Liberal Arts

Score: -4
Keep (8)	Keep. It amuses me even though I am straight outta Compton...--Sycamore (Talk) 10:16, January 4, 2012 (UTC) Mean but funny only if we can find a way to keep the delete tag on it. That's what made me laugh. Is it possible to leave a delete tag on without keeping the page on VFD? Aleister 14:03 4-1-'12 Ain't nuthin funny 'bout this, nigga! Mattsnow 14:51, January 4, 2012 (UTC) Keep the template, as Aleister says. Is there a point to listing both important black and white people though? I found it funny that they had taken the time to make a bad point with the long list, but the other one dampened the joke. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:23, January 4, 2012 (UTC) I counted more than one line. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:34, 4 January 2012 Keep -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:25, January 4, 2012 (UTC) Exactly what Aleister and EpicAwesomeness said. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:52, January 4, 2012 (UTC) Looks like more of an inside joke sort of article, like it's fuckin magical or something. And Bill Clinton is black, technically speaking. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   07:22, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (4)	Delete Bad one liner. Pup 10:14 04 Jan '12 Ha ha ha black people suck. 1234 ~ 05:59, 5 January 2012 I saw it comin' ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:08, January 5, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Son of this one.. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:05, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. Keep the delete template and remove the list? I don't know. --Roman Dog Bird 06:44, January 5, 2012 (UTC) Hah, misspelled technically and spell check came up with 'ethnically'. Even spell check knows it. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა)   07:24, January 5, 2012 (UTC) Kept -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:33, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

Category:UnCommons

Score: 7
Keep (0)
Delete (7)	I don't understand this category. Could someone please explain it to me or something? 1234 ~ 20:53, 3 January 2012 Pointless. Like my life.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jan 3 '12 21:23 (UTC) useless relic. like bizzeebeever. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:24, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Heh heh heh. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:25, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Zombiebaron ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:29, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:52, January 4, 2012 (UTC) DIE! DIE! DIE! My instinct is telling me this thing deserves to die. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:33, 4 January 2012
Comments

Graffiti

Score: -3
Keep (8)	Keep. This had lots of keep votes before the power outage. Voting for old times sake. Aleister 00:05 2-1-'12 Keep. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:24, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Keep. As a page that looks like the thing its about. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 09:08, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Add meaningful content? Genius! --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:09, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Keep.God.--fcukmanLOOS3R! 10:27, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:44, 2 January 2012 Keep. Mattsnow 14:53, January 4, 2012 (UTC) Keep. This is one of those pages that's an exception to the general rules about being stupid. --'"`UNIQ--postMath-00000001-QINU`"' 05:26, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Re-adding, as said before this should be redirected to Vandalism. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) "It would be hilarious were anyone to add any meaningful content." 1234 ~ 05:50, 2 January 2012 Delete. Dinosaur days. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:30, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:52, January 4, 2012 (UTC) I'd rather this be an article on street art. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:34, January 4, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 16:07, January 5, 2012 (UTC)

Bonfire night

Score: 0.5
Keep (3.5)	Keep. Because Zombiebaron's reason for nomming this makes no sense at all! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:25, 30 December 2011 Keep. My vote was wiped out in the power outage. Here it be again. Aleister 00:03 2-1-'12 Weak keep. I prefer this to Guy Fawkes, but it still reads as though it needs a decent rewrite. I'd prefer to see this merged with Guy Fawkes and merged together. Side note: Although it's no longer celebrated over here, going back a generation or so we also had Guy Fawkes night but it was known as cracker night. Since you can no longer buy fireworks in Australia (exception being in relationship to Chinese new year and special events that require significant licensing) it has disappeared. I remember lighting bonfires as a wee lad though - not related to this at all. Pup 12:35 02 Jan '12 As Pup said, merge them and great. It's keepable on its own though. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:11, January 2, 2012 (UTC) I've done some edits and added pics, maybe others can give it an edit run though. I'll put on my wetsuit and go back in again. Aleister 13:48 2-1-'12
Delete (4)	This is a bac. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:19, December 30, 2011 (UTC) Because this really is bac. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:11, December 30, 2011 (UTC) As I said before Guy Fawkes ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:08, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:32, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Kept; no consensus. 1234 ~ 06:00, 5 January 2012

Tales of an Emo

Score: 2
Keep (5)	I voted "delete", and composed a super extra-special bit of free verse as my reason. And then that fool-ass bitch-made punk had to go and accidentally delete VFD. And what happened to my vote when the technicians recovered the page? It was gone. GONE! There was a gaping emptiness in its place, like the emptiness that fills my soul. So now I'm sitting in front of a mirror, with a second BROKEN mirror in my lap, and I'm contemplating whether I should use the shards to cut ACROSS my wrists, or LENGTHWISE ALONG them. Crosswise is de rigeur, which I think is French for "so yesterday"? But I hear lengthwise is, like, totally effective, and I don't want to, like, ACTUALLY die. I mean, the thought is awesome -- all you pieces of shit being deprived of my presence...wandering around in a daze, muttering to yourselves "Oh, God! I never thought he'd actually do it...he talked about it all the time, but HOW COULD HE ACTUALLY DO IT?? OH GOD! Now I want to kill myself...if there can be a world where Bizzeebeever could not exist, I don't think I want to exist in that world, either." And your tears and lamentations would be sweet salve to my ethereal spirit...  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 2 '12 8:26 (UTC) ...but, no, I think crosswise is the way for me. Today, at least. My mother (that bitch!) will find me here, sprawled across the cold, cold, oh-so-cold, cold-like-the-coldness-in-my-heart bathroom tiles. These tiles are a checkerboard of porcelain ivory and jet, like the alternating states of my mind. Ivory, for those days when life seems like a dull beigeness of tolerability, and jet, for those days when I descend into the pitiless depths of the Abyss. Yes, my mother shall find my semi-lifeless, semi-nude body sprawled across these cold, square semblances of my moods, like that painting of the French Revolutionary by that Greek guy...what was his name? Never mind. Yes, she shall see herself reflected in the pool of my lifeblood, and yes, yes, sweet horror, she will look into her reflection in my blood...and see the monster within herself.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 2 '12 8:37 (UTC) Actually, if you want the reason it's actually gone, look to Wikia. TKF may have 'deleted the page', making it not easily accessible, but it was them that really deleted it, making the recent history go away entirely. 1234 ~ 17:43, 3 January 2012 Uh...I figured that out about twenty minutes after it happened, from the comments on the talk page. Thanks, though.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jan 3 '12 18:29 (UTC) Just doing my civic duty to help spread the knowledge of wikia's incompetence. The more who know! Or however that thing went. 1234 ~ 20:57, 3 January 2012 Keep. Just replace the article with Bizzee's keep vote and you've got yourself a feature. Per Bizzee's excellent rewrite. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:43, 2 January 2012 Rewritten. Looks tolerable. 1234 ~ 17:43, 3 January 2012 Keep Rewritten. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:36, January 3, 2012 (UTC) yep -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:56, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (7)	Re-adding, Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Eck -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:03, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 00:04, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete Survived reading until the word for word rip off of Family Guy's The Narrator. NRV. Pup 12:42 02 Jan '12 I was too busy cutting myself to read that far. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:26, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete. If so, so it goes. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:36, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:10, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Super-rewritten. Go vote on VFH instead. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:56, January 3, 2012 (UTC)

Oh no

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Scrap and redirect to the similarly titled, far better Uh oh! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 07:44, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Do the Oh No. Oh No! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:17, January 2, 2012 (UTC) This page sucks. Oh No! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:01, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete. Oh yes. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:25, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

User:Thekillerfroggy/sig

Score: 8
Keep (0)
Delete (8)	Delete. This is a clear and obvious flaunting of the Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid#The "@#$%^&*" Rule: Being Crass or Tasteless Doesn't Automatically Make Everything Funny Rule. This should be deleted, and the user who created it should be de-opped, banned, and whipped with his own ban stick until he bleeds. It's not like Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid is a set of guidelines - these are RULES and must be followed to the letter. Or is this just another "ignorable" policy like most of those on here. THIS IS NOT FUNNY! STOP LAUGHING AT ME! Puparadio (a gargantuan fail of this vitally important policy on Uncyclopedia) I was gonna reflexively vote keep, but then I realized that this fucker's signature is broken, when viewed in Opera on Windows. Buncha weird boxes show up between each letter. So, yeah. Murder the shit out of it.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Jan 2 '12 7:56 (UTC) because i don't want to update my parody sig of it --Nigger Fucking Faggot Etc x1000 and Shithead N/O/T/FUCKING FUNNYR.D.B. COW! GOTM THING INCEST EATMYSHORTS GAYMUSIC HAWKMAN MF LESCLAY DON'TVOTE 08:02, January 2, 2012 (UTC) The author clearly needs to read the beginners guide. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:25, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Highly offensive, decrat plz. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:47, 2 January 2012 FUCKING DELETE RIGHT FUCKING NOW MUTHAFUCKA!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:58, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Per Roman Dog Bird -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:38, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Redirect to User:Zombiebaron/sig -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:45, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	I pledge neutrality. --Gamma287 03:39, January 3, 2012 (UTC) Go back to SWITZERLAND, pussy.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jan 3 '12 10:22 (UTC) Replaced with a placeholder, nomination closed. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:50, 3 January 2012 Oy, I was archiving this, but someone decided to leave a message on my talkpage... what are you trying to do, hmm? 1234 ~ 17:53, 3 January 2012 I'm obviously part of the Illuminati. Regardless of that, perhaps we just happened to be active at the same time. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:56, 3 January 2012

Template:Nigga Please

Score: -7
Keep (8)	Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:14, January 2, 2012 (UTC) nigga please -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:31, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Keep. Mattsnow 05:39, January 2, 2012 (UTC) i'm sorry but i can't help but like this --Roman Dog Bird 08:00, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:41, 2 January 2012 Keep. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 13:42, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Damn dago kike spic conspiracy to get rid of this Aleister 13:46 2-1-'12 I've removed it from all the mainspace articles that use it so if people just want to put it on their userpages, -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:33, January 2, 2012 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Just the image is fine but... "This article is bullshit"? "Quit fucking around"? Fails Uncyclopedia:How To Be Funny And Not Just Stupid#The "@#$%^&*" Rule: Being Crass or Tasteless Doesn't Automatically Make Everything Funny. "add some actual content to it"? But isn't this the "content-free" encyclopedia? --Jushafink ( A big fail of this policy on Uncyclopedia) 04:10, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete but not for any of the reasons above. If there is an article that needs more content in order to make it a worthwhile article, it should be {{ICU}}ed. As a maintainence template it's a fail. Pup 05:53 02 Jan '12
Comments	I'd suggest banning it from mainspace, or possibly just removing it from the... what, one mainspace article it's on? As a userpages and stupid forums template I see little issue, however; it's dumb, but so are our users. 1234 ~ 05:46, 2 January 2012 Puppy: Officially this is an "Advisory" template, which would equate it to a Satan Approves or somesuch. So it isn't for maintenance, even if the text may suggest so (though other advisory templates also do the same thing). I still think it's funny enough to pass muster, regardless. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:10, January 2, 2012 (UTC) There's also the point that I don't find it funny. But I'm not sweating blood over it's staying or going. It's more that I don't see any reason to keep. Pup 06:24 02 Jan '12 Kept. 1234 ~ 17:38, 3 January 2012

Wey

Score: 6
Keep (0)
Delete (6)	Re-adding Delete ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) Curd -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:02, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Hey look, guys! Another article about nothing! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 00:03, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete. See How to be stupid and just not funny Pup 12:36 02 Jan '12 No comment. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:27, January 2, 2012 (UTC) Delete. It died in the first paragraph. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:38, January 3, 2012 (UTC)
Comments

Mayonnaise

Score: 3
Keep (1)	Keep. Weaker stuff but it's a good starting point for a re-write.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:54, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (4)	aint good -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:10, December 29, 2011 (UTC) Scrap it and start anew. --'"`UNIQ--postMath-00000002-QINU`"' 03:20, December 29, 2011 (UTC) Huff this crap! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:28, December 29, 2011 (UTC) Redirect to A Jar of Mayonnaise -- 18:53, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Kari Byron

Score: -2
Keep (5)	Eh, it's not that bad. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:34, 28 December 2011 Keep. Per Sockpuppet.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:48, December 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep, as per other sockpuppet. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Keep. I'm not seeing it. The huffing part I mean. I do see some nice pics and a fairly well written page that needs a shove or two, but nothing to deep-six the entire article over. Aleister 17:09 28-12-'11 A general clean-up is in order but not deletion. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 03:37, December 29, 2011 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Kill + redirect to the far superior Why?:Masturbate to that one chick from Mythbusters -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:01, December 27, 2011 (UTC) Per TKF. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:22, December 27, 2011 (UTC) Ditto. Pup 05:48 28 Dec '11
Comments	Kept; some consensus. 1234 ~ 03:03, 2 January 2012

Cheesium

Score: 0
Keep (4)	Keep. Amusing... again not really that bad.--Sycamore (Talk) 16:49, December 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) Keep. the data sheet gets a little lengthy but it's not that bad. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 03:41, December 29, 2011 (UTC) Per the chemical symbol guy, who seems to know chemical language. And per Mhallie, for all the right reasons. Aleister 22:18 29-12-'11
Delete (4)	This is really bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:26, December 27, 2011 (UTC) I was going to say keep, but then I took an arrow to the knee---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 05:50, December 28, 2011 (UTC) STINKY CHEESE MAN!!!  --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:01, December 28, 2011 (UTC) Shite I mean really? If you make an article about a pretend element you could make it remotely believable, no to mention all that listy shit down the bottom is a fucking bore and eyesore. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:06, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments	Kept; no consensus. 1234 ~ 03:02, 2 January 2012

Phat Lewt

Score: 2
Keep (0)
Delete (2)	Not good. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:24, December 30, 2011 (UTC) Shitty shit. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:12, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Cross-eyed pineapple

Score: 3
Keep (0)
Delete (3)	Stupidcruft (NOW WITH EIGHT TIMES MORE VITAMIN C!!!!!!!1) --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:46, December 30, 2011 (UTC) Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:29, December 30, 2011 (UTC) "What, Who, and WTF!?" is right. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:10, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments

Padiham

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Towncruft. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:44, December 30, 2011 (UTC) Per ZB. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:37, December 30, 2011 (UTC) Mildly amusing opening devolves into chav-abuse and Oprah. There's even a pointless Linsay Lohan reference.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jan 1 '12 16:08 (UTC) Where's the ham? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:35, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. OK, but I'm not saying it's salvageable. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 10:24, December 30, 2011 (UTC)

Jackass: The Game

Score: 4
Keep (2)	Keep. It's really not that offensive... an ok little article--Sycamore (Talk) 16:47, December 28, 2011 (UTC) Keep... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
Delete (6)	Really, really terrible. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:59, December 28, 2011 (UTC) It links to Street Fighter as its sequel. That actually offends me. Pup 05:46 28 Dec '11 Delete. --$Fe^{+3}AlFe^{+2}$ 03:30, December 29, 2011 (UTC) It's shit. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:27, December 29, 2011 (UTC) Three humorless lists. Also, Jackass is so 2004.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 29 '11 21:34 (UTC) Delete. Looks ugly. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:56, December 30, 2011 (UTC)
Comments