From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (1) |
- KEEP I don't really see any point in deleting this. It's relatively amusing. --mAttlobster. (hello) 00:39, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- The others are gone, so remind me again...why do we have this? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 30 '12 17:39 (UTC)
- Delete. We can check the debates, or we can simply send this one where the others went. Spıke Ѧ 17:53 30-Dec-12
- Why do you people hate these so much? I see nothing wrong with them, except they glow with an odd light, and my eyes hurt, and there's the Thomas Jefferson quote to consider.... Aleister 17:58 30 December '12
- I'm kidding, kill the fucker. We have liberated the site, well, there's that opening template. Must be a way to VFD that one. Aleister 23:52 30december12
- Wow! can we simply VFD the Content Warning? Spıke Ѧ 23:59 30-Dec-12
- If it's on a template, why not? Do the honors, sir. Aleister 00:08 New Year's Eve '12
- Delete. Who cares ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:53, December 31, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Well, we killed the other one, which was technically supposed to be used instead of this one. I figure that's a consensus that this one should be deleted too, but... ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Dec 28 '12 9:43 (UTC)
- No need for this. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 09:52, 28 December, 2012 (UTC)
- Since this site now has a warning page, the entire site has been labeled NSFW. These templates are thus redundant and obsolete. It's a dead parrot. Aleister 12:47 December 28, '12
- Delete. Same reason as the other one. Spıke Ѧ 13:23 28-Dec-12
- Delete. NO. --RockoRocks (talk) 17:06, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
- gay ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:21, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:58, 29 December 2012
|
Comments |
- On Aleister's comment that "..the entire site has been labeled NSFW." - A reminder that we're leaving Wikia very soon. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 13:28, Dec. 28, 2012
- Note to the admin that deletes this: when you need it removed from the pages it's on, leave a message on my talk page and I'll have my bot take care of it. Sheesh, Frostee. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Dec 28 '12 13:53 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I don't really have a reason, I just want to play devil's advocate. ~[ths] UotM 07:27, 12/28/2012
- In fact, even "playing Devil's advocate" requires that you advance a reason; what you want is to be a Dick. Spıke Ѧ 00:34 29-Dec-12
|
Delete (5) |
- Ok this page has been bothering me for a while. As much as I know Mr-ex777 put a lot of work into this, the style of the article is not really that funny. I mean it's just saying Bronies suck without anything all that witty contained in it. I'd also like to point out several of the images used in this article are just stolen from ED which tells me it's more or less a mirror of their article on bronies without actually trying to be satirical which is what Uncyclopedia is supposed to be about. Too much attacking bronies not enough laughs. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:58, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. "My Little Pony was just a show watched by 6 year old girls and retards" and Bronies is sure to be an article enhanced by 6-year-old girls and retards. If it keeps Mr-ex777 from working further on his gallery of Deviant fan-art porno and pissing Wikia off further, that is to the good. But was ED the source of the ode to "Mr. hands, the first Brony, whom [sic] died from getting raped by the cock of a horse"? Spıke Ѧ 01:05 28-Dec-12
- Delete. Not enough originality based on the ED sporking, nor is there that much to laugh at. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 01:11, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
- This vote isn't going to endear me much to Mr Ex, I bet. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Dec 28 '12 5:41 (UTC)
- Delete. I am a offensive and i find this brony.--RockoRocks (talk) 17:08, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- bleepbloopbloorp...kachunkachunk...whirrwhirr...does not compute...fatal error...shutting down. Ooooorp. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 23 '12 0:54 (UTC)
- Delete. It seems giddily funny to those in the know, which include Uncyclopedians of 2006 (since which time the only big change is hanging quotecruft on it). It's lost on me. Spıke Ѧ 00:59 23-Dec-12
- *sigh* Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 01:08, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. A fixin' it be needin', an over'aul e'en, but don't ye be red linkin' that thar page, ye poxy scum feeder, lessin' ye be plannin' to rewrit it yerself.◄► Tephra ◄► 01:03, December 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Avast, ye scurvy cur! Arrrgh! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 23 '12 0:41 (UTC)
- Delete. This page, tediously in the style of the thing it's about, humps two external web sites and essentially tells someone else's joke, adding no original cleverness. Spıke Ѧ 00:45 23-Dec-12
- Delete. Arrgh matey, too much listiness on these shores. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 01:07, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Does need the barnacles scrapped off but some of the lines made me laugh. Let's sew a parrot on the shoulder and get working on this me mateys! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:41, December 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- Ni! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 23 '12 0:37 (UTC)
- Delete. It has everything: Penises, child rape, a consipiracy between Wikipedia and the Czech Republic, the ATF, and the Jews. But now Clippy and the listcruft are gone. Spıke Ѧ 00:56 23-Dec-12
- This article gave me cancer. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 01:04, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- Nah. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 23 '12 0:31 (UTC)
- There's potential were it expanded beyond simply being a selection of lists, at the moment it just isn't that funny. --Chiefjustice3DS 09:49, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
- This is bad. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 01:01, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. Too important, not bad enough, and I reverted much of the crap. --Lord Scofield Stark 20:53, December 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Sure it could do with a bit of work but I'd say it's not terrible enough to delete. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 01:03, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Too much gay porn, too many images of Sir James Q. Wales, Esq. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 20 '12 16:06 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Also the only page we have on Jimmy Wales (redirect), this page is a magnet to any Anon who thinks that writing a one-liner that somehow insults Wales will win them instant favor. It would be borderline adequate if we restricted it to Autoconfirmed, reverted it to about the start of 2010, and deleted Did You Know? Spıke Ѧ 16:29 20-Dec-12
- Kept ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:57, December 29, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- No. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 23 '12 0:31 (UTC)
- Delete. Does this belong in the Short Pants department? --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:48, December 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Tries to morph two video-game re-releases from 2004 into a Microsoft gaming console. If that weren't too subtle, quickly bogs down in its own listing of technical details until, at the end, Microsoft Legal realizes, "Well fuck, we are in a lot of trouble aren't we". That's the only humor I could sense, and it was contrived. Spıke Ѧ 23:26 26-Dec-12
- Another terrible computing article. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 01:05, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Written by DaemonSoup in 2006, rewritten by Reverse Genocide Cockatrices in 2009, with nothing more than tweaks since. By the way, let's huff {{Clippy}}. Spıke Ѧ 23:26 26-Dec-12
- Eh, lot of user pages use it. Doesn't offend me. Ban it from mainspace, maybe. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 26 '12 23:29 (UTC)
- I don't care what user pages do. I don't mind the content. But the gimmick now called a "pop-over" pranks the reader (in my case, annoys the reader) in order to amuse the author. Spıke Ѧ 23:34 26-Dec-12
- Aw c'mon, let authors amuse themselves. That's all Uncyclopedia's good for, anyway. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 27 '12 0:58 (UTC)
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep Well above VFD quality. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:49, December 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Not too retarded, somewhat amusing. If nobody likes the silver-on-black effect of old consoles, be sure to put it back the way it was. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 24 '12 23:17 (UTC)
- I like the effect, but it must also be
monospace . Spıke Ѧ 23:35 24-Dec-12
- It was monospace, it was monospace. Sheesh, SPIKE, you and your custom css. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 25 '12 0:57 (UTC)
- I think it is funny.Thankyoubloke (talk) 19:27, December 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:01, December 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. A very old monospace performance-rant ridicules newbies trying to use BASIC. The most hopeful work since 2006 has been several renamings. Anon today added an actual Intro and a section, but they're not quite English and not quite funny. Spıke Ѧ 22:55 22-Dec-12
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- With the reader warning page as the first thing people see, these templates are redundent, not needed, obsolete. Kill them with nokindness. Aleister 19:48 BoxingDay'12
- Delete. The joke of templates to parody Wikipedia's templates is pretty stale by now. Templates that try to guide the reader in interpreting an article that the reader hasn't yet begun are either useless or mark failures of the writer to get the job done himself. This template is only a crisis because of a three-day Anon attack, whether a prude or a Wikia employee incognito, doing the world a favor of moving from IP address to IP address and tagging articles he finds offensive, including certain user pages. Spıke Ѧ 20:11 26-Dec-12
- Ugly ugly ugly piece of shit. You think we can actually delete this?!? Holy Be-Jesus. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 26 '12 20:44 (UTC)
- Delete. But keep the image. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:55, 28 December 2012
|
Comments |
- Aleister, I know you hate letting the Corporate Machine timestamp your messages, but you must let it timestamp your VFD nominations. Also, you must prepend : to a link to a template to keep the template itself from appearing. Spıke Ѧ 20:05 26-Dec-12
- Also, Aleister, Don't change the fucking section head to change the vote from deleting one template to deleting ten after I have voted. Reverted. Spıke Ѧ 23:30 26-Dec-12
- /tail between my legs, slinks away. Aleister 23:33 26-Dec-12 (I didn't know there were nine of them!)
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Both Hotadmin4u69 and I have deleted the same section of listcruft this week (a long list of supposed store locations). Further, however, that leaves virtually nothing, and nothing at all that can compete with our better article at Tesco. Spıke Ѧ 14:49 19-Dec-12
- No. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 20 '12 16:04 (UTC)
- Delete. --Chiefjustice3DS 09:50, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- This is loon-activist Fred Phelps daughter, who will be picketing the funerals of the Sandy Hook killings this week. A hatchet job might be too good for her, but at least it's a page where people can hatchet away and not feel too bad. Taking it down this week means the Phelps win. I say gum it up even more, and I'll put in a few minutes on it. Aleister 11:55 18decemb12
- p.s. A bit later. I'm trying to save it because she's actually the spokesperson, and thus the face of, the Westboro Baptist Church. And what a face!
- Keep. Good enough now. --Lord Scofield Stark 20:26, December 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not so bad. --Chiefjustice3DS 09:45, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. An evangelist's daughter, I take it. There is one section that is not listcruft and there is nothing clever about it; it's just a hatchet-job. Spıke Ѧ 21:25 17-Dec-12
- Kill it with fire. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 06:31, December 18, 2012 (UTC)
Delete. Nice opening quote, though. --Lord Scofield Stark 09:58, December 18, 2012 (UTC)
Like SPIKE says (and Aleister admits), this is a hatchet-job. "Bitch hates fags! lololol" We know. Now make us laugh or GTFO. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 18 '12 13:10 (UTC) Aleister wants to work on it.
- Kill. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 00:58, December 19, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I think I've done enough to save it. Take another look, you may agree or you may throw a jar of warm piss at the page. If it's deleted the terrorists win, just sayin'. Aleister 14:52 19decemb12
- The opening "brain-damaged" insult sorta impairs the funny by shouting "THIS IS A BIASED HATCHET-JOB". If you start out neutral and then work in insults sentence-by-sentence, could work better. Just sayin'. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 20 '12 18:05 (UTC)
- Did what you requested, she's a bit to go, ain't she? Aleister 14:21 Festivus-eve
- Kept. --Chiefjustice3DS 09:45, December 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Article about a British soap is an overlong, listy Anon magnet for comments that the show is shitty but that one bird has a nice arse. Spıke Ѧ 21:34 24-Dec-12
- A soap opera is a soap opera! ZOMG I'm so funny, pointing out the obvious like that! Now I'll append 4,000,000 bullet-pointed random jokes, and it will be even funnier! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Dec 24 '12 23:08 (UTC)
- Delete everything about this. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:19, December 24, 2012 (UTC)
- No, this must not stand. 'Aleister 20:14 26th of December '12 (APB)
- Holy shit Aleister voted "delete" on something. The Apocalypse really did happen. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Dec 26 '12 20:42 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- Inept. Has been incubating for six years and is getting worse. It is only at the start of the section on Trivia that we think we may be dealing with a native speaker of English. Spıke Ѧ 00:30 20-Dec-12
- WTF? —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 01:16, December 20, 2012 (UTC)
- No. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Dec 20 '12 16:03 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (3) |
- It was nommed for VFD and kept once, and Modus did much of the fixing on the page. Could be expanded, or reverted. And stop kidding about the IOC censoring it, WIKIA may believe you and censor all our Olympic pages themselves. Aleister 2:18 14decem12
- Keep. Per Aleister --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:59 Dec 14 2012
- KEEPWe should keep this, we should. --mAttlobster. (hello) 22:11, December 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Could be so much better, and probably "violates" the Amateur Sports Act. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 02:07, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. With apologies to Aleister in Comments, the best Modus version still has no intro, jumps straight into listcruft, and doesn't get better. Anon later added the trite theme of "none of this matters to me." Spıke Ѧ 02:35 14-Dec-12
|
Comments |
- Was ready to vote Delete on the basis of malformatted listcruft until Aleister edited over me. Is there a better version in the history that you've neglected? Spıke Ѧ 02:23 14-Dec-12
- The thing about the IOC censoring it was a joke. The Amateus Sports Act only forbids commercial uses of Olympic-related terms, but the IOC has had a history of deliberately misinterpreting it to mean, as CNET nicely puts it, that they can "make sure nobody even talks about the darned event." —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 02:27, December 14, 2012 (UTC)
- All the more reason to keep it. The last Modus version is maybe the best, although I haven't checked it all. Maybe SPIKE can work his magic on the page, or Qzekrom, but, what? No, I'm outta here. Aleister 2:32
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (5) |
- Seriously? No, seriously? Dude, this is on so many pages that if we delete it, it will render several hundred pages unreadable. So in other words, don't delete it for the love of god!!! That is all. ~[ths] UotM 02:03, 12/15/2012
- Per Dan Methinks its safe to say that if we delete this template (Ill do some Muse stealing here) the chaos it will defy imagination. I translate: KEEP MUTHAFUCKAS!!! -- Кıяву Тαгк Сойтяıвs 2012-12-15T02:18
- Keep. Only because it would be a pain in the dick to repair all the broken links. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:12, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
- OK, just keep the damn template. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Kemador CUN|IC Kill | 08:34, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
- Seriously, SPIKE, UN:N. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Dec 15 '12 9:48 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. This is the template that ensures that every utterance of TheHappySpaceman on anyone's talk page must be in a font of his choosing. From the Change History: Dude, I'm the only one who uses this template. My template, my rules. I translate: This belongs in his own userspace. Spıke Ѧ 01:28 15-Dec-12
- Well, I never agreed with using Times New Roman for everything in the first place.... —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 03:03, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- That is no part of the question. It is not the space from which the template is referenced but the space where the template lives. This template--like your "Propaganda" template we discussed yesterday, like a hypothetical template with a photo of my face on it, or like any of our signature files, belongs in one's own userspace, or else it's mainspace vanity. A bot may be able to help THS restore readability to the affected pages. Spıke Ѧ 02:43 15-Dec-12
- Touche.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 02:49, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
- @Kamek98 To answer your question (since Dan hasn't done so yet) its mostly used in forum pages. And by the way, apparently in forum pages its against the rules to edit archived threads. Most of the forum threads Dan's posted on are archived. So, how will you deal with that if you remove the template? -- Кıяву Тαгк Сойтяıвs 2012-12-15T05:14
- To be fair I don't give a damn about this template except THS, but I would fucking support this to be kept as THS always uses it. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Kemador CUN|IC Kill | 08:34, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
- If THSM's use of the template is problematic, that is something that should be raised and discussed directly of itself; deleting a plausibly usable template won't resolve that. Meantime, THSM, you don't own template-space templates, so if you want to apply your own rules to your own templates, keep them in your userspace. Otherwise please come up with a better reason to revert qzekrom in the future. -— Lyrithya ༆ 19:59, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
- @Athyria In case you didn't notice, after I had said it I went and reverted back to Qzekrom's changes (he made it a lot cooler). I know I don't own it but I feel I have the right to edit it as I was the creator of it. What's more, I don't really edit it anymore except for when people vandalize it (like when Frosty just recently switched it to the Wingdings font, which was what prompted Spike to mark it as VFD in the first place). In other words, I know I don't own the template and I only edit it to improve it, so it doesn't belong it userspace. ~[ths] UotM 21:08, 12/15/2012
- If you don't "own" it, then is it a trademark violation for me to use it? —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 21:10, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
- @Qzekrom No. I'd prefer you didn't use it, unless as a parody of me, but there is nothing legally stopping you from using it. ~[ths] UotM 21:23, 12/15/2012
- Q.E.D. A mainspace template that one writer objects to other writers using is mainspace vanity. It qualifies for deletion regardless of the vote here. Spıke Ѧ 21:46 15-Dec-12
- @Spike Okay, obviously you're only listening to the parts of my comment that work in your favor. I said that it's not a trademark violation for other users to use {{Times}}. I said I'd prefer he not use it, but I never said I'd sue him if he did. So for god's sakes, let's do what Frosty said below. ~[ths] UotM 23:19, 12/15/2012
- Holy fuck go do something more constructive than bickering over a completely harmless template, seriously this is completely pointless. If this is somehow voted for deletion I nominate SPIKE and Qzekrom to clean up the broken links it will create since they are the only two that give a shit about it existing. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:51, December 15, 2012 (UTC)
- What he said. Also, you people are all insaneous. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 16 '12 9:39 (UTC)
- Kept Because this is unimportant. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:42, December 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- More band-cruft, this time about a teeny-bopper band which was apparently a TV show (now off the air for 3+ years), and which does not even exist anymore by this name because Nickelodeon/Viacom owned the rights to the original name. Because I don't find it the least bit amusing on its own, I'm calling UN:CM on this. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 9 '12 7:07 (UTC)
- Delete. A rag-tag hatchet-job on a minor band. But UN:CM is too severe for bandcruft, as Codeine's Mum surely didn't take in Bubblegum at all but only opera and variety shows on the telly. Spıke Ѧ 09:12 9-Dec-12
- Delete - Nickelodeon has gone to hell since I was a kid. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 09:38, Dec. 9, 2012
- Deleted - Nat Wolf to Hell.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 16:16, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Make an end. --Lord Scofield Stark 12:22, December 10, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. The begginning was quite of 'okay' but it just got worse and worse towards the end. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 14:37, 10 December, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete - Admittedly, I know less than nothing about sports, but I know a crap article when I see it. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 06:03, Dec. 9, 2012
- Dude...ah God. Duuuuude. Vinnie Jones is an actor. He used to be a footballer, but he's an actor now. Tough guy. Breaks other guys' fists with his face. Slams guys' heads in car doors, and then stops to answer his cellphone with a polite "Bonjour!" Yeah, that Vinnie Jones. This article is a turd-stain, though. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 9 '12 6:33 (UTC)
- Delete (formerly Keep). Noting BB's details. Kip, I am not against exaggerating a person's character; but if exaggeration is his schtick, then what we are doing is telling someone else's joke, and less well than he did originally. Spıke Ѧ 10:42 9-Dec-12
|
Comments |
Keep. A real article about a real person, with a real approach to humor: the same exaggerated swagger that Bizzeebeever uses to pan the article. Delete the section Random Facts that you probably don't even care about and some of the hatchet-job humor and this would be okay. Spıke Ѧ 09:05 9-Dec-12
- Huh. I figured you of all people would vote against it as Chuck Norris-style rambling, which is to say, humor solely derived from over-exaggerating a famous person's masculinity. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 09:11, Dec. 9, 2012
- That's not exaggerated swagger, it's his actual persona. In every movie he's been in. The scene with the cellphone and the car door was from Snatch. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Dec 9 '12 10:33 (UTC)
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Listcruft, rants, nonsense year numbers. Overnight, Anon added two new paragraphs of rant, but there is nothing in the prior version worth keeping, nor really based on the border city. Start over. Spıke Ѧ 09:09 6-Dec-12
- Delete. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 03:25 Dec 7 2012
- I know all the words to the tune quoted in the intro (the Marty Robbins classic). That quote, aside from the opening reference to the "disbanded Oligarchy of My Cock", is the only thing the least bit interesting about this puddle of liquid toxic fail. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Dec 7 '12 5:29 (UTC)
- Delete - Great place, great song, crap article. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 06:06, Dec. 9, 2012
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Hate to disagree with SPIKE, but as big a derivative piece of crap as this is, it's one of my favorite article titles. I'm diverging from my usual "burn all shit" to vote "keep". Just for the title. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Nov 28 '12 21:46 (UTC)
- Keep. This article mildly amused me, even though it didn't make me chuckle. This is more than I can say for some of the featured articles in recent times. -- HIPSTER T)alk C)untributions B)an 18:26, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Various Anons assert that, if a trivially stupid algorithm were coded in the computer language that happens to fascinate me, then it would be, well, quaint. As unlikely to amuse the general reader as are the code examples inside Haskell. Spıke Ѧ 17:13 28-Nov-12
|
Comments |
- Kept ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:40, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (1) |
- Weak Keep - I dunno, I mildly chuckled. I think it's a funny concept, but it simply needs a reworking. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 01:12, Nov. 27, 2012
- I nominate Kip the Dip. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 27 '12 7:00 (UTC)
- Seconded. ("No good deed goes unpunished.") Spıke Ѧ 09:14 27-Nov-12
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. "Chicken Fucking is any action involving fucking a chicken"--and no, Captain Obvious didn't write this. Excess capital letter in the title is the tip-off. Dumb, doomed to stay dumb, and an IP magnet, whether said IP is into bestiality or animal cruelty. Spıke Ѧ 15:54 26-Nov-12
- Delete. A header in search of an article. None found. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:36, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. --SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 16:28, December 9, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept If Kip wants to fix this then go for it. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:42, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (1) |
- User:Yrtneg/ Nov 25 2012 23:49
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. We have several articles that make serious sport of Islam. But this one is just swears, made-up organizations, awkward acronyms, listcruft, nonsense numbers, the works. And you have to know the punch line to type the page name--though it's Hinduism where the cow has special significance, isn't it?! Spıke Ѧ 22:49 24-Nov-12
- Delete. Completely random after the first paragraph. Thought about pruning it but that would have left a picture caption. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:43, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept Lack of votes. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:43, December 11, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. 90% listcruft. Created in 2007 and occasionally batted around by Anons ever since. Won't get better. Spıke Ѧ 21:35 3-Dec-12
- I SAY, VOTE, THOU FVCKERS. (Seriously, what is going on here? People gonna vote on VFD, or what? This toilet is backing up.) ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Dec 4 '12 6:11 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Noticed when a link Nig Jr. was created today. It should go as well. Spıke Ѧ 21:35 3-Dec-12
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (2) |
- No testicles! The U.S. Chief Justice has pissed everyone off, most recently by nodding as the government pleaded that Obama-care is not a tax, then voting to uphold it exactly because it is--a strange flip-flop that referred to his partners as "the dissent." That is, there is plenty to ridicule. Despite that, this article is a hatchet-job: a collection of meanness, approaching libel, based on nothing. Let's start over or have a red-link. Spıke Ѧ 18:10 28-Nov-12
- Please murder this pile of randumbo. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Nov 28 '12 21:51 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (2) |
- Irremediable garbage, baked stale since 2006! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Nov 23 '12 14:51 (UTC)
- Delete. Anticipating a replacement article from Simsie (see Comments). Spıke Ѧ 02:53 24-Nov-12
|
Comments |
- Droll ramble, from the incongruity in the Intro to the verbal deconstruction later on. The Crazy Fat Kid illustration is getting stale, as we segue any food item into childhood obesity. But Simsilikesims was by recently to clean this up, and added text relating it to the Food Network; can she be imposed upon to take control of this article generally? Spıke Ѧ 15:06 23-Nov-12
- What this article needs is a complete rewrite, and a solid concept to tie things together. I don't know if I am up to the task, but perhaps I will start something in my userspace. The muffin/cupcake picture, if not copyrighted, is certainly not "stale", and is a more recent addition. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 02:43, November 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. You don't have to delete my first article. Dude, please don't.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 20:44, November 23, 2012 (UTC)
- My first article got deleted a long time ago, as QVFD worthy. I recommend that you copy this article into your userspace, rarely is a writer's first article mainspace-worthy. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 02:50, November 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. idk he worked on this for quite a while, I have definitely seen worse articles. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:14, November 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep It's going to be ok. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:20, November 28, 2012 (UTC)
- does this count as ED level new user abuse?--fcukman
LOOS3R! 05:14, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- I came here to fuck bitches! Kamek98 has made a poopy. And may have spent a lot of time smearing it over the screen. Specifically, he has prepended several screenfuls, evidently from a personal diary, to an unremarkable article of the Wacky War genre, which never explains what the article is about, what in reality it relates to, or why anyone other than he should care. He has sought a Pee Review and asked me for my opinion (I hope this suffices). Getting a Pee Reviewer to take this article seriously might be the final nail in the coffin of Pee Review. Spıke Ѧ 12:15 23-Nov-12
- I really really really hate to say "fuck you" to a new user...so I won't. Instead, here's a quote from an anonymous source on IRC: "He is the new Benson". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Nov 23 '12 13:13 (UTC)
- Delete. Too much focus on some fictional or non-notable person named "Kyle". Reads like vanity, rather listy, and smells of wacky wars. I disagree that reviewing VFD material "would put the nail in Pee Review's coffin", so I have done a quick Pee Review on this article. My Pee Reviews are generally less thorough than SPIKE's though. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 02:54, November 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Also less scathing, often a good thing. Spıke Ѧ 09:17 27-Nov-12
- Conditional anti-delete vote. I will change my vote if Kamek can explain to me what in heaven's name this article is about and what part of it is supposed to be funny. Good luck, Kamek. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:42, 27 November 2012
- It's a story I wrote in format for Uncyclopedia based on people in my personal life. Kyle is a fat bully and Sam is my bestfriend.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 00:46, November 29, 2012 (UTC)
- I believe that may qualify as "vanity", dawg. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Nov 29 '12 4:41 (UTC)
- I still have no idea what part of it is supposed to be funny. : / —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:53, 30 November 2012
- I wrote it to be a silly story. That's all. I love writing.--SirPeasewhizzdeNewYork Click here to talk 01:51, November 30, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Suggest we park this as a subpage in Kamek's user area. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:29, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
- As the Keep votes to-date are from pity rather than quality, I concur, as Simsilikesims seems to also. Spıke Ѧ 09:17 27-Nov-12
- No consensus, been here for over 10 days. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:46, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. It's a passable attempt at humor. Has already been labeled a stub; yes, it needs photos; Sycamore recently cleared away some listcruft on a Wacky War theme. There are much bigger fish to fry. Spıke Ѧ 22:46 22-Nov-12
|
Delete (1) |
- Burninate! In case you're wondering, the Pitcairn Islands are a set of several small islands inhabited by the people who staged the mutiny on the HMS Bounty, and were led to the islands by the Tahitians they had captured. Come on, that's amazing. So why is this article a load of tosh which seems to have something against Zoroastrianism, industrialisation and the state of California. Both of which have nothing to do with the Pitcairn Islands. -- HIPSTER T)alk C)untributions B)an 22:39, November 22, 2012 (UTC)
- The Uncyclopedia article on X often has a lot with nothing to do about X. If you know enough about these islands to make sport of them with material that actually has something to do with them, you might be the perfect candidate to go for your first Save off VFD. Spıke Ѧ 22:53 22-Nov-12
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (1) |
- Pointless waste of an excellent topic. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Nov 21 '12 8:19 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Doesn't so much "waste an excellent topic" as fails to complete it. Makes the point that Youth think that black is cool--then quits. Spıke Ѧ 11:02 21-Nov-12
- Lack of votes ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:46, December 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- No. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Nov 23 '12 15:41 (UTC)
- Delete. This article, like the porn novel Naked Came the Stranger, is about Anons engaging in tag-team fiction writing (and it is almost as long, and just as forced), not in a coherent humor article. New permutations of babble does not equal funny, not even at book-length. Children writing Wacky War articles are people trying to crack wise about concepts on which they are ignorant, and thus this war stems from "a supreme court case....in 1343." Spıke Ѧ 15:56 23-Nov-12
- Delete. I kind of feel bad for wanting to delete it, just because of how much the person has written. --XeMadoka (talk) 21:34, November 25, 2012 (UTC)
- The number of IPs in the History, plus the incoherence of the result, convinced me it was more than one "person." Spıke Ѧ 21:40 25-Nov-12
- Oh. I didn't look at the history, to me the article just looks like one person writing several things to himself over a number of days. --XeMadoka (talk) 11:55, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. There is nothing worth here retrieving. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:38, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- Some actual humor would cheer up this rambling junk-pile. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 20 '12 19:24 (UTC)
- Delete. Author Schmiloschmokis has not been down for breakfast since he created this in 2006, and obviously harbored a personal fantasy about himself and Paul McCartney. It is a credible mock-up of an album review. No, it does not have any actual humor and, to the point, if not author there is no one who is going to insert any. Spıke Ѧ 04:10 21-Nov-12
- Delete.Unfunny story of domestic violence, followed by track listings. No humor detected. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:28, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- I found Uncyclopedia's worst article. Salute me, bitches. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 20 '12 18:55 (UTC)
- Delete. To bein to flesh out "worst": Article is about an invented organization, derived from bandcruft, article begins with an eye-glazing Wildeism and the weasel-words "Some have described", remainder of Intro is not English, article uses
<math> , article descends into listcruft and doesn't have section headings. Horrible markup, no photos, red-links. QED. Spıke Ѧ 04:04 21-Nov-12
- WTF!!!!!!!PINAISTHEBESTORIGINIZATIONEVER!!!1111111111 --fcukman
LOOS3R! 05:49, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete.Randomness, check. Incoherence, check. Listiness, check. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:23, November 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. I still get a laugh when I'm having a bad day when I get on here and look at this article. Personally, I think it should just be kept for how it can brighten any day, except Oscar Wilde's. RS (talk) 22:13, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
- KEEP There's just no point in deleting this. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:36, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 02:58, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. It's just a mostly-sexual list of crap not really about Oscar Wilde. I've already had my run in with sexually crude things not being funny and I find this to be no different. When it's not sexual, it's "Your Mom" and similar jokes of immature level. --LuMontyZ Was Here 19:21, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
- I have a similar problem with gratuitous potty humor. However, Oscar Wilde is not only Uncyclopedia's Patron Meme but a gay pervert, and thus the perfect Wildeism is gratuitous potty humor that is not really about Oscar Wilde. In fact, Wildeisms that don't have some sort of double meaning ought to be eliminated. I'm holding off voting; don't remember the details, but I seem to recall that all the site's Wildeisms are cross-linked; I got VFD's approval two years ago to delete some component of this and found I had to undo my work. Spıke Ѧ 19:35 10-Nov-12
- Delete. Unnecessary, we have Uncyclopedia:Wilde. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 22:19, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Don't know how nominator got this nomination to be born with an age of 5 hours (probably cut-and-pasting the timestamp) but I've set it to the timestamp of his signature. Spıke Ѧ 19:35 10-Nov-12
- Sorry about the timestamp deal. I just copied the template like the instructions said. Thanks for fixing it. I guess my beef with this article is that because it's "The Patron meme" it's fine, but my former article that revolved around Fire Emblem, shipping, and crude jokes about the shipping was delete after vote because it was "too crude." I just want some consistency here. LuMontyZ Was Here 17:40, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Consistency? Dream on! Spıke Ѧ 17:42 11-Nov-12
- Seriously, I try to show consistency (because it makes me more persuasive and proves that a Delete vote is not personal) but it is not required. Voters on VFD are voters, not paper-graders, and are allowed to vote any way for any reason; if they have criteria, they are allowed to have as many exceptions and special cases as to seem that there are no principles at all--though, again, that is less persuasive than consistency. Voters above all are not required to have the same criteria for what should stay and what should go. You ought not nominate something on VFD as real or perceived retaliation for the deletion of an article of yours. In addition, "too crude" might not mean vulgarity or sexual references; it might mean crude typography or facile humor, such as puns on people's names. It's conventional here to include links to what you are talking about so we can see for ourselves and perhaps give you more relevant advice. Spıke Ѧ 01:01 12-Nov-12
- I get what you mean completely. It isn't personal. In fact, if I knew that this page was the Patron Meme of this site I wouldn't have bothered. I suppose as an aspiring math teacher I've been trying to grade papers. I hope I didn't come across as petty or angry. This is the articleUser:LuMontyZ/Fire Emblem: Abridged specifically the version before today's edit. I appreciate any feedback. LuMontyZ 04:16, November 12, 2012 (UTC)
- No need to feel that you shouldn't have VFD'ed the article. Any article, no matter how hallowed, shouldn't be allowed to stick around if it is a tedious mess, like this one. Somebody should reach in there and kick just about 90% of these "quotes" out on their sorry asses, for being devoid of humor. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Nov 13 '12 16:35 (UTC)
- It was I who nominated that article of yours for deletion (see archive 265) and I have now given you a detailed review on your user page. Spıke Ѧ 01:05 14-Nov-12
- I'm glad someone agrees! I'm not sorry, it's just the feeling when you find out how, to use your word BizzeeBeever, hallowed something is. Then comes the feeling that says it's untouchable. Lu 00:15, November 14, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (2) |
- We get it. <Your_city_here/> is a horrible, horrible nightmare of a place, filled with chavs, drunken chavs, drunken chavs having sex, drunken chavs having drunken gay sex, several traffic circles, and (for a bit of variety) ...some chavs. If you don't like your town/city/state/province/country, please feel free to die or move away. Just take your shitty article with you. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 4 '12 16:36 (UTC)
- Delete as Vanity. Besides, why is this located at "Basingstoke" and not "Basingrad"? —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 18:52, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Because Basingstoke is the name of a city and thus a valid name for an encyclopedia article; whereas Basingrad is the punch line of a joke (a trite joke, styling a place after the Soviet Union), which no one is going to type. Spıke Ѧ 19:32 4-Nov-12
|
Comments |
- Abstain. All of the humor is trite and none of it is clever. But I would not see, in our campaign against chavcruft, a new, large hole open up at Basingstoke, a few miles away from the gaping hole at Reading, where we have no article (not even for that other Reading in that other Berkshire that is pronounced the way it's written) and people mentioning snooker tournaments have to use a link to book-Reading. We are laying waste to the English countryside. Spıke Ѧ 17:31 4-Nov-12
- I have been to Basingstoke so I will have to abstain in case that visit left me biased in either direction. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:09, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Then you ought not just abstain but repair. I was driven through Basingstoke once on my way to work in Reading. It had an ICL plant and a cinema. Slough, now that (phew!) deserves a replacement article. Spıke Ѧ 01:06 12-Nov-12
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- The quintessence of a horrible, horrible Uncyclopedia article. Randomness, bad language, and pointless lists searching for a concept which floats somewhere, out there, just over the horizon, and permanently out of reach. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 4 '12 15:25 (UTC)
- Delete. And don't forget: Make gay sex the principal theme. Spıke Ѧ 15:42 4-Nov-12
- Delete. Can't stand reading it all!-- Sir Sinner blah blah 23:05, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Listing very badly, shipping bilge water by the ton. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:12, November 11, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. A real article about a real British film reviewer, based on real things. Unfortunately, it's primarily based on one real thing--the subject's speech impediment--until author titles the fifth section: OK, so this whole 'R' joke is getting a bit shit now. Overuses quotes, memes, gay humor, and the one real joke. Spıke Ѧ 15:59 4-Nov-12
- Keep. It didn't make me laugh out loud but it was funny. As Spike said it overuses one joke and that's just fine. Lu 18:18, November 12, 2012 (UTC)13:17 12-Nov-12
|
Delete (3) |
- Hello! I bwought this hewe because I don't know if it's any good, ow if it's any bad, and also because I don't know who "Jonathan Woss" is. It weads like Elmuh-Fudd-style gibbewish to me. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 4 '12 13:12 (UTC)
- Delete, and also I'm not counting Spike's keep vote because he gave a list of valid delete reasons yet the only actual keep reason he mentioned was "based on an actual person." Spike: If you want me to care more about your opinions, stop being really fucking stupid at expressing them you ass. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:26, November 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I exchanged the contents so that Jonathan Ross is the article and Wossy, which no one will ever type, is the redirect. Spıke Ѧ 15:59 4-Nov-12
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (1) |
- lol. and no, the quickest way to revive this website is to admit that the community is effectively dead and start from scratch. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:26, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Cunt. Crap. -- Shit. 19:27, Nov. 15, 2012 cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit
- Delete. What the hell did I just read? RS (talk) 21:50, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
- A fine idea! Nominating an article that, although obscene and cryptic until the first See Also, is obviously a Uncyclopedia meme and that has survived four other attempts, the latest not quite half a year ago, is the nearest thing to calling out the veterans and administering CPR to this website. Spıke Ѧ 21:55 15-Nov-12
|
Comments |
- Anyway since some shitty users who really helped in the killing of this site (not naming names but it's Spike) decided to take this nomination seriously, I'm going to take it even more seriously by closing it immediately since in-jokes are VFD proof READ THE RULES FELLAS. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:28, November 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. It's too short. MagicBus (talk) 15:52, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
- Really incoherent. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 16:36, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This belongs on QVFD, sirs. Too young for VFD. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Nov 10 '12 17:25 (UTC)
- And this nomination had no timestamp at all, because MagicBus didn't follow directions. Spıke Ѧ 19:37 10-Nov-12
- ehhh yes, this belongs on QVFD. Since MagicBus is new I will give him instructions on how to use QVFD and VFD. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:48, November 10, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Please God make the Grue shit stop. This shit is so unfunny. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 4 '12 15:25 (UTC)
- AAAAAAAAAA! —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 15:56, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. As for Ubergrue. The illustrations here are particularly cruddy. Spıke Ѧ 17:33 4-Nov-12
- DELETE I still don't know what Grues are. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:51, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. A little dry and could do with some work, but it gave me a good few chuckles and happens to be covering a very prominent chain of institutes too. --Lord Scofield Stark 15:36, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Provides schoolcruft (Extra! All the students here are nerds mostly interested in Pr0n!) before descending into listcruft and then quotecruft. Vote Keep if you find anything of general interest. Spıke Ѧ 01:32 29-Oct-12
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. There are a couple good bits in there, but the bulk of this article is listy and unfunny.--Snippy 09:50, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. This is awful. Intro is a bag of memes; then we jump in with, "It has often been debated...." (See also, "It is rumored fact that...."--another encyclopedia cliché). In the last section Balrog versus Ballhog is a pun stolen from Bored of the Rings. Spıke Ѧ 11:19 24-Oct-12
- GodDAMNit, this is not an article! How does shit like this escape La Guillotine for so fucking long? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 4 '12 13:24 (UTC)
- Delete. Take out the lists, and there isn't enough left for an article. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 15:08, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. What the hell is this? --Snippy 06:03, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. The ponderous introduction begging Admins not to huff this article is a talk-radio caller who begins, "Before you hang up on me...." And likewise, the real problem is that author has nothing real to say. Let us rise to his challenge. Spıke Ѧ 11:22 24-Oct-12
- Delete.. Possibly redirect to Mary, except that nothing links to this article either. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:18, October 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Pure unadulterated vomit which has somehow escaped deletion for a mind-numbing SEVEN GODDAMNED YEARS. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 4 '12 13:22 (UTC)
- Delete.. Wow, this is just awful in every way. --HM (T) 19:43, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Pretty terrible.--Snippy 06:00, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. I normally abstain on HowTo:, as the namespace is a useful way to divert from Mainspace the children who can get no nearer to funny than preachy. This one, however, has nothing to say but a jaunty description of the desire to murder. Spıke Ѧ 11:26 24-Oct-12
- DELETE We need not this or its similar. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:03, October 29, 2012 (UTC)
- I can only hope that the author killed himself with a spoon. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 4 '12 13:21 (UTC)
- Delete. The humor is seriously lacking. Kill this article with a spoon.-- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 15:05, November 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- Looks like a meme, unfunny in English or Welsh or anything else. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate)
- Delete. Articles that are lists of episodes are vulnerable here; such an article that makes no attempt to explain either the basis or the common thread of the episodes is junk. I'll strike my vote if someone who follows current fashion contradicts me--and puts a hint of it into the article. Spıke Ѧ 00:52 24-Oct-12
- There is no way possible for this "article" to find redemption. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 4 '12 13:25 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- Blockish, listy article. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate)
- Delete. And now, dear reader, I begin a profound work that will stereotype Australians. Spıke Ѧ 00:53 24-Oct-12
- Sounds like NASCAR to me, and there's nothing really interesting here. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Nov 4 '12 13:19 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. (Formerly Delete.) Romartus's rewrite, and the importance of its subject, has already rendered this keepable. Spıke Ѧ 11:13 24-Oct-12
- Per SPIKE. No colonization required. —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 20:35, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:15, October 25, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (0) |
Let's kill it as they killed the actual guy several years ago! This shit isn't even worth colonization. And yes, I checked the history DAMMIT! —qzekrom.net16.net clicky! 23:23, October 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete.
"Gayer than Christmas," literally, this time. There is nothing here and nothing in the history. However, it is worth colonization; Hussein, apart from his key role in our recent history, is a ridiculous character. Spıke Ѧ 00:50 24-Oct-12
|
Comments |
- I have removed the old article and re-writing it in the space. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:42, October 24, 2012 (UTC)
|