From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Blah. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:43, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Against.Yeah, this article is really short. -- UserTalkContributions 22:02, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
- If coding people like it I will reverse my direction. Aleister 22:06 13-3-'12
- If you took all the letters from this article and put them in a completely different order, it might be funny. Pup 12:11 14 Mar '12
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (5) |
- I can't believe I'm doing this, as I hate these articles, but Keep. as this works with grue and eurg as a series. Given we're keeping the others, we should keep this. Pup 05:35 13 Mar '12
- Don't do that.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 05:49, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Haven't you already been blocked for lack of civility on VFD? Pup 06:01 13 Mar '12
- that's called uncivility? Weird.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 09:23, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, it was just an unrelated question really. And you misspelled wired. Pup 09:26 13 Mar '12
- Despite the un-sightly formatting, there's nothing wrong with it. In terms of quality, it's above an ICU article but below a "good" article. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 17:13, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
- It's more or less an in-joke, and more mediocre than bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:41, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
- By approving this article, means that I approve of the great and funny. -- UserTalkContributions 21:58, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- This is like, not funny. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:48, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN Fork you! 16:35, Mar 14
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (6) |
- A ghost speaks: (Actually, I find this page rather funny. Vote to keep. --Chronarion 08:52, 9 Mar 2005 (EST)) EST? What time is it really, Chronarion?
- Keep MrN Fork you! 02:02, Mar 13
- Speedy keep dis in-joke -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:11, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit - This is more than some stupid an in-joke. This is history. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 02:31, Mar. 13, 2012
- Godly.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 03:58, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Someone moved my vote to the comment section. I am undeterminted to revive it, and will vote again with different wording. Aleister 22:04 13-3-'12
|
Delete (4) |
- I say we delete it. Considering the fact that we already have other articles just like this. This is just complete spam. -- UserTalkContributions 23:24, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
- There wasn't any point to me adding the above links except I like swearing. Pup 12:05 13 Mar '12
- When did penis become a swear word? I mean, openly flaunting about with your penis in plain sight might be considered offensive, but the word isn't the thing itself. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:52, 13 March 2012
- I was just going through articles that were similar, you penis. Pup 05:14 13 Mar '12
- This is a piece of cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:09, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
- Try writing actual humour. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:49, March 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- History gives pause. This has been up for deletion four times, survived them all with some major users voting yes. I've brought it back to a 2006 version when Famine was caring for the page. Puppy's links below are actually only two links, so don't be fooled by Puppy's tactics, which have fooled people for days (exactly what time is it, Mr. Puppy?). Ha. Whoa, move aside myself, here comes a ghost of a former user...Aleister 1:57 13-3-'12
Kept Fucking kept the cunt. MrN Fork you! 16:34, Mar 14
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (5) |
- For.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 14:14, March 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Not bad enough to delete. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:23, 11 March 2012
- Not bad. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:03, March 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. If something comes along and is 10 times better then perhaps but otherwise I think it can hang about a bit more. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 21:12, March 12, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Kissing ass is something we need an article about. MrN Fork you! 02:04, Mar 13
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. This article could be funny, but isn't. It tries to be funny by being offensive but fails to reach over-the-top absurdity, leaving something that's bland and repetitive. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 04:38 Mar 11, 2012
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:41, March 11, 2012 (UTC)
- EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:47, March 11, 2012 (UTC)
- Boring. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 16:58, March 11, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN Fork you! 20:44, Mar 13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Dumb. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:41, March 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 05:01, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Although I do like the Aussie kiss line. In fact that was on my user page for a while. Pup 05:19 09 Mar '12
- Depressing.
1234 ~ 06:35, 11 March 2012
- I want a girl, just like the girl, who married dear old dad. Heh heh. Give ma a twenty and she'll do anything. Aleister 19:21 11-3-'12
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (2) |
- Certainly not a feature but not too bad to be an embarrassment. Perhaps a legal eagle Uncyclopedian may come onto the site and vastly improve this. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:47, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Pretty good in parts - reckon like Romartus says: a very nice potential starting point (Perhaps I might wade in myself for conservation week on this one).--Sycamore (Talk) 14:09, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- I was looking for the rules of Uncyclopedia in the search box, and came across this. Boring. Where are the famed rules of Uncyclopedia, please? Mattsnow 06:25, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
- None too good. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 08:48, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Pretty bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:53, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I just found them! Funny how you can be on here for almost a year and not know them lol Mattsnow 06:38, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
- KEPASDXRTY
1234 ~ 06:34, 11 March 2012
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (8) |
- Yay EGAOEITDOM! An award created by Rangeley which encourages recordings of UnNews articles has rewarded some great recordings. SPIKE put in well over a year providing voice to uncy's news department. It's been dormant for awhile, but it shall, at some point, return in full glory and give voice to the events of our time (and VFD is shirley not the place to destroy a long-established and multi-winner award). Aleister 10:52 2-3-'12
- Keep. Active - Most computers have some kind of recording device meaning it will only a take a couple users to get this moving again. How about we just say, 'no nominations this month'?--Sycamore (Talk) 17:15, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Mattsnow 01:37, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep.Deleting this will not encourage any new recording talents from coming forth.--Funnybony 12:56, Mar 4
- Keep per Funnybony's rationale. Pup 01:24 04 Mar '12
- Keep it in active use. --Gamma287 22:32, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. My 11½ Mannies are safely in a bank vault, but Uncyclopedia is measurably weakened by gratuitously cancelling one inducement for new users to do multimedia. Nominator's rationale is indistinguishable from a vendetta. Spıke Ѧ 00:36 5-Mar-12
- Keep. Audio humour here may have lapsed of late but don't see a good reason to drop this. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:43, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (7) |
- There's been less emphasis on the recording aspect of UnNews and more focus on writing lately. This isn't bad, but it's had the unfortunate consequence of obseletizing the EGAoEitDoM. I've proposed we retire this aard because of its irrelevance in the past before, and now it's far less active than it was even back then, when it was still significantly inactive. It hasn't been edited since November of 2011, and even back when we (read: SPIKE) were creating recordings en masse, the result was often amateurish and hokey. Let's retire this officially, already. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:40, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
What award is this again? Pup 03:55 02 Mar '12
- Retire -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:07, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, keep it as an archive. But retire it. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:42, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- This is a piece of history that's become irrelevant so let's archive it and move on. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:34, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Archive. We don't need an award that anyone who even enters is pretty much guaranteed to win. pillow talk 00:19, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
- But come the day, and it could come any day, that two or ten people make recordings, and have fun competing against each other month after month. Why get rid of a once good thing when it will surely be a future good thing at some point? Aleister 00:56 3-3-'12
- That has got to be the worst line of reasoning I've ever seen on this entire site, focusing on an extremely unlikely "what-if" scenario instead of staying in fucking reality. I tip my hat to you, sir. What the fuck has this place come to. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 23:44 Mar 03, 2012
- Sycamore pointed out in his Keep vote that most computers have mikes now. Mine doesn't or I'd record some. Recording UnNews just has to catch on again and at some point there would be very creative entries, so I don't see why saying so is a stretch. Aleister 13:30 4-3-'12
- If you really feel like defending this award's continued activity, then buy a microphone and actually be active. Right now your vote is rooted entire in implausibility and nostalgia for an era that never existed. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:18, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Eehhh EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:08, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Archive. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 23:44 Mar 03, 2012
|
Comments |
- Sycamore: It hasn't been edited for 4 months. If this page were an admin, people would be railing for its removal pretty soon. I appreciate your's and Aleister's optimism, but that's really all it is. Pretty empty optimism on an award that serves a function that no longer is a focus on this site, for better or worse. Keeping it around as "active" is more or less a charade. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:07, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- As Sycamore and I pointed out, it's had it's day, it's taking a well-earned rest, and it will come roaring back at some point. Everyone who has ears should take a listen to Dexter and Mrthejazz present this piece of hard news to see that UnNews readers have a wide field to play in. Maybe this "nom" (and awards removed on VFD? Huh?) will get people interested in making recordings again. Yay! memory of SPIKE! Aleister 23:53 2-3-'12 p.s. Nobody put a VFD tag on the page, so I did (under protest that an established award should not be huffed on VFD. Huh?) and corrected the clock.
- Thank you, Aleister. The rest of you, learn to follow procedure, damn it! Oh, and there is indeed precedent for using VFD to close such things, BUT YOU STILL NEED TO FOLLOW PROCEDURE and tag the things properly. Thank you.
1234 ~ 03:06, 3 March 2012
- What precedent? What long long established award won 42 times has been huffed on VFD? I still say that this is an invalid nom considering the requirements for VFD, and considering that very few people come to VFD (and so this is hidden among the weeds) and that it should be left as is at a minimum or taken to a forum page. So, what precedent? Thanks. Aleister 23:32 3-3-'12
- Lyrithya only cites PoopSmith Lounge as a precedent, which was part of this page and isn't at the same level as a long-established award won 42 times. So LLPOF, NALAATW. Aleister 13:15 4-3-'12
- Arguments to keep have swayed me. Yeah, I'm that fickle. Pup 06:22 03 Mar '12
- If this is archived, where will the page be moved to? Pup 02:55 04 Mar '12
MrN Closes This Shit Well, this has been here for ages so I'm going to offer a solution which I hope is the right thing to do. I feel totally neutral about this one as I can understand it from both viewpoints, and I hope the guys who want this kept totally active will understand my judgement.... Having read what some of the "keep" voters are saying I think perhaps people thought the award might be deleted completely or maybe moved somewhere. That's not going to happen. All wiki links to this award will also stay where they are. Nothing is going to change other than the page being sysop protected and "Temporarily Suspended". But... we can open it again in the future if we have enough people to make a contest of it. Until then it's still there as an advert to encourage people to get on the mic. If you wanted this kept totally open as it was before I stuck my ugly spanner into the works I suggest you try putting forward a convincing argument in the Village Dump (which is probably where this should IMO have been discussed in the first place). MrN Fork you! 13:17, Mar 9
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Mildly chortle-worthy. Pup 10:21 03 Mar '12
|
Delete (5) |
- What is this I don't even -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:30, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
- WTF? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:41, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Per above EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:11, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Nary a guffaw -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:35, March 7, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Very bad. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:33, March 9, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (5) |
- Deleting this is just not cricket. Pup 10:24 03 Mar '12
- I'm also a cricket fag. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:35, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
- It needs a couple of pics though, maybe of a cricket. Aleister 10:39 3-3-'12
- Keep A vital player. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:07, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Cricket. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:29, 6 March 2012
|
Delete (2) |
- This is bad. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:22, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Yes it is. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:57, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Added pictures, minor edit changes. I think it can survive now. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:56, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
Kept MrN Fork you! 16:58, Mar 7
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- A fairly accurate description of the show, sadly. Pup 09:52 01 Mar '12
- I've never seen the show. If I had I'd be voting against it. Aleister 10:57 3-3-'12
- If we could delete the show I'd also vote against. Pup 11:18 03 Mar '12
- I say keep. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill | 09:53, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- I'd like to know what somebody who's actually seen the show thinks, but, from what I can tell this isn't good. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:27, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
- whuh? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:40, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Sigh EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:09, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN Fork you! 15:00, Mar 7
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- I found it interesting, like the picture, and a few minutes time could make it funnier. Problem? Aleister 10:35 3-3-'12
- Did some edit and deletion of stupid. Not enough to write home about, but not bad. Aleister 11:28 3-3-'12
- Significant improvement with minimal effort. Problem? Pup 11:36 03 Mar '12
- Just for the lulz--fcukman
LOOS3R! 04:31, March 5, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Not good. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:25, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Eh. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:37, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Fuuuuuu EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:10, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Could be redeemed. Any takers? Pup 10:29 03 Mar '12
Kept MrN Fork you! 14:06, Mar 7
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (1) |
- Well that redirects to Law, I don't know if I should have put it here. Mattsnow 06:25, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
- QVFD when/if the VFD'd article itself gets deleted. Otherwise, do nothin' til then. Case closed! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 08:20, March 6, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (5) |
- Short but sweeeeeeeet. Feature. Aleister 10:52 29-2-'12
- Too long -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:32, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Too bright. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:11, 1 March 2012
- Too horny. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:49, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Too holy, too pony, too whatever. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SecondChanceForMe (talk • contribs) 14:17, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Too short Pup 04:27 29 Feb '12
|
Comments |
- Abstain.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 09:39, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Think of the children. For Gods' sake, won't someone think of the children? Pup 10:40 29 Feb '12
- And here I thought you didn't believe in God, Puppy. ; ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:42, 1 March 2012
- Note placement of apostrophe. Pup 11:52 01 Mar '12
- You believe in the existence of multiple all-powerful entities? How does that even work? O_o —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:16, 2 March 2012
- UN:ADMIN Pup 12:37 02 Mar '12
- I kind of like it but it seems more like a goofy user subpage than a mainspaced article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:18, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
- The education contained within is high. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by SecondChanceForMe (talk • contribs) 14:19, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Kept --Chiefjustice3DS 14:11, March 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (1) |
- Equivamptalk 06:37, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (7) |
- Not a single laugh to be found. --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 05:06, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Fuck you, Jesus! EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:12, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Can I please vote twice? Pup 09:48 03 Mar '12
- gay. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:32, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:41, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Nearly as bad as the one in the Bible. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:06, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Oy vey! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:24, March 3, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- 3-liner, total shit.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 09:26, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Unfunny, stale in-joke. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:28, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Stale when it was created Pup 09:35 02 Mar '12
- Kill. Holocaust denial denial denial denial denial is the perfect ending -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 09:46, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Send it to the ovens -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:02, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Per TKF. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:40, March 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep---Denied! Aleister 1:41 3-3-'12
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (3) |
- Not too bad. Mattsnow 10:16, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Not particularly bad. Could use an image though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:11, 27 February 2012
- Per Socky. --Chiefjustice3DS 18:53, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- Not good. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:24, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- A day in the life of William Gaines, but I think the marginalised Aragones was funnier then the rest of it. I really wanted this to have something redeemable as well. Pup 01:00 25 Feb '12
- This article's loss is our gaines hohoho. --Black Flamingo 00:46, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
- It just seems kinda blah. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:53, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:35, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 19:11, 1 March 2012
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- I agree it's not very good, but it'd be like deleting the Obama article. It's better to have a very average article than none at all. Mattsnow 15:57, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
- The Obama article isn't that bad, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:08, 27 February 2012
|
Delete (6) |
- Recently had a revert war where it vacillated between shit and crap. Pup 11:20 26 Feb '12
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:32, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
- This is not a very average article. This is a horrible, listy piece of garbage. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:03, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Terrible state, let Mattsnow rewrite it out of mainspace. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 10:05, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Pile of dookie-wookie. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Feb 28 '12 20:55 (UTC)
- GTDRERTESTETET??????????TRATRWATYTAWETTYWYT!!!!!! MY MOM IS HITLER AND MY SISTER IS KIM JONG II!!11111--fcukman
LOOS3R! 12:10, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- If it ends up being deleted, could you move it to my userspace and tell me? Thanks. Mattsnow 15:57, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Is it worth it? To me it needs a bulldozer to improve. Pup 06:34 27 Feb '12
- Well, maybe some ideas in there may give me some inspiration. Mattsnow 17:48, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (1) |
- It's ok I guess. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:29, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Not laughing. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:28, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Short and bland. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:00, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Borin'. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 10:05, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It's borderline okay. I'm not hugely invested in keeping, but not disliking enough to delete. Pup 11:19 26 Feb '12
- Kept.
1234 ~ 18:50, 1 March 2012
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (7) |
- Not that bad. Plus, well, the title says it's a list. Mattsnow 10:08, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Don't.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 10:53, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Not really deletion worthy.--Sycamore (Talk) 08:37, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
- HAAAX! OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 08:04 27 February 2012
- As listy as it is, it is still funny. -- Fe+3 AlFe+2 04:25, February 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:27, 29 February 2012
- Keeper Too many regular users want it kept (I think we decided 5 was the Magic man number). Aleister 21:55 29-2-'12
|
Delete (8) |
- Listy, and vanity from some DeviantART user. Beyond that, NRV. Pup 10:04 25 Feb '12
- Listcruft. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:09, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Not good. An article could be a list without being a bad list. This is bad. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:10, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Aiee. --Black Flamingo 00:48, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
- tl;dr ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:28, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Tssk, tssk, tssk. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:00, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- This is:
- Really bad
- Really random
- Cliche
- Listy
- Too long
- Grab a chicken, eat some poison 30000000 times while dancing and screaming, "Yeah baby!" -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:58, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Piece of poopie-woopie. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Feb 28 '12 21:00 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept.
1234 ~ 18:48, 1 March 2012
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- Clever concept, and a half decent structure. Okay as it is, and has potential to be better. Pup 01:05 25 Feb '12
- Per Puppy. But then you would be a cat. Aleister 17:14 25-2-'12
- Needs some work but not too bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:54, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- No laughs. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:50, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 18:46, 1 March 2012
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (6) |
- For --fcukman
LOOS3R! 13:12, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- .ot ton nosaer doog eno em eviG --Gamma287 04:22, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- peeK. No need to delete everything that's old. Besides, they're cute. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:26, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- .elcitra dna cieopotamono ekil sdorw nad-ycnaf ruoy dna, no ni edor uoy noil niatnuom eht dna uoY kucF "roF" retsielA 21'-2-52 74:21
- NO! This is a classic. It's one of the reasons I decided to make a account here. --- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 04:29, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep! |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Aussie CUN|IC Kill | 09:32, March 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (7) |
- The onomatopoeic self-referential article. Pup 11:20 24 Feb '12
- Burn it with fire. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:11, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Grues ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:14, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Way too unfunny YleerFPI 00:54, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Yeesh. --Black Flamingo 00:51, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Grue-crufty unfunniness. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:52, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Nurp -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 10:10, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 18:36, 1 March 2012
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. I quite like this, just needs someone to add a little more.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:30, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- British people should swarm this and work on it. And how could the category "Marine navigation" exist without it? Think of the children. Aleister 12:54 25-2-'12
- I like it. Very British, of course, but okay. Pup 12:09 26 Feb '12
|
Delete (3) |
- Why does this exist? -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:08, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- myth: BUSTED -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 04:58, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- I don't get it but maybe it's because I'm an uncultured American. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:50, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Gave it an edit and extended some of the ideas in the article. Should be enough to save it in my view. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:59, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Kept.
1234 ~ 18:35, 1 March 2012
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. It's not that bad - just not really a mainstream topic. I've added some links etc.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:06, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
- AAP -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:14, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Vital topic. Fix it don't nix it, keep it don't sweep it, save it don't pave it (over), Abbotsford House! Aleister 13:00 25-2-'12
- What TKF said. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:49, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Not good. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:33, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Made me laugh so hard that I pissed myself. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:15, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Showing your age when you forget incontinence pads. Pup 04:20 26 Feb '12
- I thought nominating stuff like this anymore was a bannable offence. If not, it should be. Quit wasting space on the VFD or VFH! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 02:47, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Let's be serious, people VFD is not a playplace.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 04:26, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Wily and IWKY have very valid points. But there does seem to be a lot of space here at the moment. I wonder if people are tagging articles as {{fix}} instead of fixing them or nominating them? Pup 09:14 27 Feb '12
- I apologise for not being serious. In my defence I was serious yesterday for approximately an hour whilst dealing with a minor plumbing issue. She's ok now, and some of the hair has already grown back. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:01, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Listy, and borderline vandalism. Pup 12:26 26 Feb '12
- Delete The only line worth keeping is "(Huff log) 20:09 . . Zombiebaron (talk contribs) huffed "Matthew Broderick" (The tribunal has spoken)". mAttlobster. (hello) 13:14, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Would be better if we had an image of it. Pup 01:19 26 Feb '12
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:26, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. On the grounds that though this isn't good, perhaps something even worse will take this slot whilst a more accomplished writer/editor gets this by the scruff of the neck and shakes out something a lot better. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:26, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- As I suggested, Undictionary:Rick Santorum could work in the interim. What we have right now is seriously a little embarrassing. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:05, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (7) |
- As much as it would be nice if we had an article on this astounding American, I can't help but feel that the current article about him is shit and should be destroyed to give our future generations a chance to write about how this man will be our greatest, homo-phobic, mentally unstable president yet. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 02:02, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Ya this is bad. Redirect to Undictionary:Rick Santorum. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:16, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Red links. Hate them red links. OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 06:22 27 February 2012
- Really bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:04, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm confident that it won't come back even worse. That's hard to envision. pillow talk 08:47, February 28, 2012 (UTC)
- https://twitter.com/maryhchrist/status/174447948158087168 Pup 11:36 28 Feb '12
- Per TFK, redirect to the undictionary entry. Santorum Custard. Aleister 12:18 28-2-'12
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (1) |
It contains bad grammar, and has no point of view, and the article itself is complete randomness. -- UserTalkContributions 04:06, February 27, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- For future reference, new spam pages go on qvfd.
1234 ~ 06:02, 27 February 2012
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- This was on the UN:FIX list and due to expire in a few days. I have no idea what Kubb is, and this seems to have been edited by a number of people with commercial motives. Pup 01:24 24 Feb '12
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:56, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- LISTS--fcukman
LOOS3R! 04:56, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- delete Mattsnow 10:17, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- get out. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:25, February 26, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (2) |
- Week keep. Passable at best. Could do with a bit more work but it's passable. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 22:46, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
- It's not the greatest but imagining the Gershwin brothers as hoodlums with unusual fighting methods is a good start. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:53, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Quite the appalling scrap heap, this one is. Gangsta' and profanity does not a satire make, mister "author"... --Gamma287 18:58, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Sigh EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:53, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:22, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
- nope -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:14, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept because you all smell funny and good gods I need more painkillers.
1234 ~ 19:01, 25 February 2012
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Many people join the Ku Klux Klan so they can support the network as the network who is desperate for money takes advantage of mass racism in this world. So if you vote to keep it, that's racist. Pup 11:27 24 Feb '12
- Why do we have so many Nickelodeon-related articles? They mostly suck. -- 13:00, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Why not Zoi- I mean, why not just delete all of them? Another Sonic-style purge? I do believe only two of those are left (last time I checked...). --Gamma287 04:21, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- yes yeeeeeessssssssssssssss --Roman Dog Bird 19:36, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:13, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Unfunny racism crap. YleerFPI 00:52, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Remove the lists and the racism and you have nothing left. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:37, February 25, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Randumb. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:57, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Abducted by aliens... Carrot Top... the quadratic forumla... joined at the hip with his twin brother... anal fisting... – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 15:23 Feb 23, 2012
- nope -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:14, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
- an insult to a great man --Roman Dog Bird 01:27, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Badly potatochopped images, sexual references. Yep. The usual. This article is a crook... --Gamma287 19:11, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Wow this is bad. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:35, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
- I don't even. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 15:27 Feb 23, 2012
- nopenopnopnopnopnope -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:14, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
- you see how the quotes are having a conversation? i hate that, i really do. i'm far from a funny person, but people who do this shit really have no chance of ever making a single person laugh, save for maybe their own, worthless selves (which is what i do all the time actually HAHAHAHA oh man). PS: THE LION KING SUCKS HAVEN'T ANY OF YOU EVER SEEN FERRIS BUELLER (i haven't by they way, i've decided not to watch anything starring people who share the same first name as myself) --Roman Dog Bird 01:31, February 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Your name is Ferris? Oh, and how could we have an article on this guy and not mention Chocolate war? (Yes, I am scatophiliac.) Pup 11:34 24 Feb '12
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Major topic, it's ok - Imperial Colonisation nomination?--Sycamore (Talk) 20:34, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete To quote my esteemed colleague TKF "truly, truly flawed". I say let the injustice to Nelson Mandela which is this article be no more. Let us huff this now, so that another generation may rise another day to take this place. Mr Mandela we apologise .MrN Fork you! 19:44, Feb 21
- It ain't funky -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:07, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
- For such a notable person, Nelson could do much better but in his current state, we may as well huff him. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 18:31, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:24, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Well this is... bad. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 15:31 Feb 23, 2012
- Effort was put into it, just not good effort. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 15:49, February 23, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (2) |
- It needs work someday but I don't see this is bad enough to flush down the U-bend. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:01, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm with Romartus on this one. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:56, 20 February 2012
|
Delete (4) |
- This is-a bad. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Feb 18 '12 17:56 (UTC)
- Cruft about crap nobody cares about. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:37, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
- Dear Author, writing about Klay World was a waste of time as it is utter shit. Sincerely, Earth. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 22:36, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
- WTF? I have no idea. MrN Fork you! 00:25, Feb 23
|
Comments |
- This is...about some YouTube series or other. Honestly, this page made me not want to watch it. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Feb 18 '12 18:08 (UTC)
- Kept; apathy.
1234 ~ 04:57, 23 February 2012
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- No comment. And yes, I checked the history. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Feb 21 '12 19:37 (UTC)
- Delete MrN Fork you! 20:53, Feb 21
- JJJJJJ,GFGFGGGRFGFG,POPOJHYFEDREF.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 03:09, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
- What the fuck did I just read? Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 18:32, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
- iie -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:34, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- While we're a humour wiki, we're also an encyclopedia and consequently we have a wide array of topics. There's bound to be some topics you don't care about, but that's no good reason to delete a decent enough article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:27, 22 February 2012
- Seems fine as is, but can use a touch up. Made me laugh, brings back lots of memories. There have to be thousands of worse pages crawling around here than this. Aleister Duggar 4:23 22-2-'12
- It's fine as it is with some good laughs. Could do with a touch up but it's not delete-worthy. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 18:27, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- 1) I don't know who these people are, and 2) this crappy article doesn't make me care. 3) Also, it looks like libel, not parody. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Feb 21 '12 19:02 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN Fork you! 00:22, Feb 23
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete Bad, always been bad. Make it go away now. MrN Fork you! 18:53, Feb 21
- Trash. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Feb 21 '12 18:59 (UTC)
- poop poop poop pooop --Roman Dog Bird 19:45, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Had a look at it when some asshat IP fucked it up even more. Yeah, it really does suck. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 20:58, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 02:34, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
- bgberjbgkbvirsbg,hgouehfiuoghiouegeh9hg.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 03:00, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. Made me laugh...--Sycamore (Talk) 19:07, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Funny.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 05:45, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
- This is back? I worked on it last time, and will go back and do more. Did the IP's destroy it? It did make me laugh again looking at it. And it has to eventually go back to 0 hours because no VFD tag was put on it. If it gets huffed, I'll userpage it and work on it there. Aleister 13:18 21-2-'12
- What does the title have to do with the article? I mean...is it that "gingers" and "retards" are a "minority"? Because that...isn't particularly funny. It doesn't offend me, it just isn't funny. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Feb 21 '12 13:53 (UTC)
- ...but it's a classic! --Gamma287 22:36, February 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep MrN Fork you! 00:35, Feb 23
|
Delete (4) |
- I nommed this a while ago, and it was kept on the grounds that it could/would be cleaned up. No it can't, and no it hasn't. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:52, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Taken from the horrible article itself... Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 17:46, February 20, 2012 (UTC)
- Dear God, I'm gonna say the same thing I said last August: "It's like Encyclopedia Dramatica jacked off in the general direction of Uncyclopedia, and missed — but li'l spatters of splooge still managed to land here, and created this page." ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Feb 20 '12 18:15 (UTC)
- I dont wanna get into it man -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:08, February 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- A racist bastard IP started the page, and it had some funny on it so I mined that, but he and I had an edit war. When I was gone he came back and flocked it up again, and that's how it's had two VFD rounds now, so I just reverted it back to my rewrite, and I'll do another edit sweep. Aleister 20:01 22-2-'12
Kept This has been reverted back to a better before being vandalised, or just badly edited over a long period of time. I ain't the same... Try again later you minority hater! (MrN would like to apologise for that last pun). MrN Fork you! 00:35, Feb 23
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. Really not that bad. I'd tided it up a bit.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:53, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Not the worse, and even if we get a stub out of it it's better to have a page for this Vital topic than a red-link. El dante 12:49 18-2-'12
|
Delete (1) |
- ZZZOMG THIS SUXX0RS!111oneoneone ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Feb 17 '12 14:00 (UTC)
- Delete. Too thin. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:14, February 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 04:13, 22 February 2012
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- "HAHA American Football is shit!" Yes. Yes, it is. Unfortunately, so are you. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Feb 16 '12 9:49 (UTC)
- This is actually the same article as American Football (copied word for word), thus I think that this qualifies for instant deletion, and if this receives enough delete votes, American Football should be deleted as well. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:14, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- What he ^ said, dudes. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Feb 17 '12 12:59 (UTC)
- Which came first, this or that. Pup 01:28 17 Feb '12
- Delete MrN Fork you! 01:34, Feb 22
|
Comments |
- Comment. Incidentally, do you know why both Football and American football are called "football"? Because...they are played on foot, as opposed to horseback. True story, for the ignorant among us. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Feb 16 '12 9:56 (UTC)
- Well, it's possible that association football (so called because its rules were codified by an association with "association" in their name, the other part being "the football", inventive right?) is called football because players typically use their feet to move the ball across the field. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:42, 22 February 2012
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (2) |
- Just reverted to a better (but shorter) version. Concept has potential. Keep but {{fix}} it as a stub. Pup 09:25 16 Feb '12
- Nice. I just switched the two paragaphs around, it seems to work and read better that way. I like this page, and the possibilities are theroetically endless. Aleist'r 13:04 18-2-'12
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete Outdated Indeed.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 06:31, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Random, short, and not funny enough to keep. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:36, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- No. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 11:35, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
WTF? I didn't post a comment to this entry. Stupid Wikia. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Feb 16 '12 7:19 (UTC)
Kept + {{Expand}} Needs moooooore MrN Fork you! 20:57, Feb 21
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- I did some edits, not enough to satisfy Puppy's craving for decent writing but maybe enough to make it blah. I'm not interested enough to continue, although I did once greet a Japanese person. Aleister 13:14 16-2-'12
- Keep Actually, it's a pretty good idea. If this article is expanded and tweaked a little it should be fine.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 20:49, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- The corners of my mouth slowly turned upward as I read this. Also, my genitalia are stuck up in a tree somewhere in Rutland. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Feb 18 '12 7:52 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Painful, strained randomness. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:01, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Resembles a dead cat in humour quotient and ugliness. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:51, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- The definition of randomness. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:24, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kill quotes, and everything after Step 1 and add a half decent Step 2 and conclusion and you have an okay article. The more true but complex it is, the better. Steal ideas from something like this. Inherent contradiction would be useful here too. (How is it that according to that other link, Japanese are both introverted and direct?) Pup 12:10 16 Feb '12
Kept MrN Fork you! 15:22, Feb 21
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Very popular and amusing in parts. Perhaps simply reverting this to the version it was VFD'd last time?--Sycamore (Talk) 09:48, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Really? this? *cough cough* ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Feb 18 '12 11:32 (UTC)
- All the cool kids party in Newry. Aleister 12:47 18-2-'12
- It's okay. Nothing too special but it's passable. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 22:38, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- "This <insert_city_here/> SUXX0R5!! ZOMG!" ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Feb 18 '12 7:40 (UTC)
- I stand by my vote. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 12:46, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I have reverted back to the version kept before on VFD which is very different than that voted on by Bizzeebeever, and EpicAwesomeness. Bizzeebeever you should have checked the history better before nomination, and possibly reverted to a better version. Still might get huffed though... ;) If this passes again this time, this page should have semi-protection added. MrN Fork you! 12:12, Feb 18
- I checked the history, going back about 4 years, and found nothing terrific. I did miss the old VFD, though. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Feb 18 '12 13:27 (UTC)
Kept + semi-protected. MrN Fork you! 15:28, Feb 21
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Trimmed to passable, if not brilliant, level. Pup 10:49 16 Feb '12
- Puppy cleaned up this Vital page. Aleister 12:55 18-2-'12
|
Delete (1) |
- I don't especially hate this article, but the first two paragraphs are stoopit, and the rest are devoid of laughs. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Feb 16 '12 9:31 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN Fork you! 15:20, Feb 21
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. Nothing too wrong about it. Liked the picture caption --Count of Monkey Crisco 17:06, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep Not our best article, but not offensively bad and could be made good by someone with some flair in not too much time at all. MrN Fork you! 20:16, Feb 17
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:53, February 18, 2012 (UTC)
- I've been chased by many a good security guard. Aleister 12:57 18-2-'12
- Keep. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:33, February 19, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
The humor is as stale as two month old popcorn.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 03:48, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Eh. Sorry, but it's still a short stub. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:28, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- The classic "This thing just sucks" article. Calling someone a douche isn't funny! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 11:34, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- NRV -- 16:09, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I fixed some of the grammar and reformatted the list section. By the way, I have been known to eat two month old caramel popcorn. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:57, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Craker Jack Popcorn I hope :9--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 07:22, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Suggestion: I foster an irrational hatred for security guards, and I think this article is savable. Whaddya say we KEEP it, then stick a {{Fix}} tag on it? That-a-way, if nobody rewrites it properly, it'll go away in a month. Deal? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Feb 16 '12 7:14 (UTC)
- Withdrawing Vote It's looks better. Needs a little more work but its plausible.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 07:22, February 16, 2012 (UTC)
Kept MrN Fork you! 15:18, Feb 21
|