From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: -5
|
Keep (9) |
#Keep. I like this article. The concept is funny: it's a journalist's job to report the news, and this one is phoning it in by reporting on his sneeze. It's reasonably well-written and we've kept far worse. pillow talk 05:21, January 21, 2011 (UTC) I'm staying out of this one. pillow talk 17:56, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- What the hell are you on, it reads just like the news (or maybe i'm just a dumbass, you tell me). It's a stupid subject yes, but come on! I see it as a parody if anything. I even chuckled a bit! That's rare with me reading things here! I'm just some putz though, so whatever. I like it. --Roman Dog Bird 06:01, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:18, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I do like this one, I hope it doesn't get deleted. --FlareHunter76 1:43, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Everything I do should make the headlines. I'm that important! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:53, 21 January 2011
- Keep. There was this one time I remember doing a sneeze, and stuff came out my nose, and I had to use what was called a "handkerchef". It wasn't a nice experience, and this news report captures it perfectly. Maybe call it quits at this one, though, or maybe at "UnNews:Crimes against humanity in my pants". Aleister 12:00 21-1-'11
- Keep. I dont see the controversy at all. --Shabidoo 12:04, January 21, 2011] (UTC)
- Keep The joke is treating this incident as news, thus it has to be on UnNews. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:08, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Not based on news? So? Climb off that high horse there, this is UnNews, remember? Besides, UnNews:My son makes the play of the game is hardly based on news, and it's one of my favourite articles on the site. This is an amusing little article, and the more so because it's in UnNews. So keep it. --UU - natter 12:59, Jan 21
- Keep. YES! UU and Matt lobster get it (not to mention all you others that voted keep)! If I move this off UnNews part of the joke is gone. Also, I didn't "resist" putting it on Illogicopedia, I just said I wasn't going to try to get it removed from here. I may put it on Illogicopedia at some point, but not at the expense of it getting deleted here. Maybe you guys just don't get the joke. That's a common thing for any article. Also Lyrithya, I will do something with this, I just haven't yet. And yes, I did put time and thought into this. -- 13:11, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. A week has passed, so we can legitimately nominate this one in place of the vote closed by Mordillo. This is a quaint first-person essay. As it is not based on news and does not read like news, it has no business being in UnNews except that we have a Recent UnNews column that you can use to hump your article before it has been Pee Reviewed. Lyrithya suggested that the article would be a better fit at Illogicopedia and author resisted. I do not insist that it be huffed if author will move it to any other namespace. Spıke Ѧ 02:33 21-Jan-11
- Big sneezing poopy I agree with everything Spike said. Unless the user moves it, kill it.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 02:37, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete or Move. Your choice. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 2145 EST 20 JAN 2011
- Aye. Unless he actually does something with it... kill, kill.
1234 ~ 02:48, 21 January 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- PLEASE KEEP. I promise to take a stab at it. either keep it or send it to my user space :)
This is the first time Ive seen an article I really want to rewrite (though I agree with the criticism and I wont do anything until February).
--Shabidoo 23:28, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Big poopy Good title, but how the concept was executed made it go splat in the wall. Kill it.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 02:08, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It's not a good title; what's with the orthography? why not Couch surfing as you'd expect? Anyway, from the first sentence, this tries to sell me rather than make me laugh. First paragraph alone is utterly incoherent; then the red-links start. Spıke Ѧ 02:13 21-Jan-11
- I. Hate. Red. Links.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 02:14, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. OK, now this is a great example of an article with no redeeming value. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 2154 EST 20 JAN 2011
- Way too incoherent. Seems like an amusing concept though, from what I can get out of it. --Roman Dog Bird 06:10, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The springs are broken on this one. Return to warehouse. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:24, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Serious suckage on display. --UU - natter 10:24, Jan 21
|
Comments |
- This is mostly the work of Guaka in 2007. Read the talk page (as nominator should do anyway, at least to see if it was on VFD before)--it is a tie in to some blog. Spıke Ѧ 02:19 21-Jan-11
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Another big poopy What is with all the GTA articles being mixed up with politicians? Must be the same author who created the character lists of a similiar GTA article below. Doesn't he know that making these kinds of GTA articles are not funny and only are good for being fed to rabid pitbulls owned by Roman Dog Bird? Anyway's, kill it. --If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 02:01, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- I only have one dog and he's fuckin' adorable. --Roman Dog Bird 06:12, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I feel bad faulting author below for rehashing the Bush/Clinton era. This one goes all the way back to Pinochet/Allende; and except for playing out that drama, there's nothing here. Spıke Ѧ 02:10 21-Jan-11
- uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh --Roman Dog Bird 06:12, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Don't see the connections on this one at all. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:26, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Hey, it's a shit GTA article! What are the odds? --UU - natter 10:21, Jan 21
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete.I highly doubt.... no, scratch that, I KNOW none of this relates to the game. Too much randomness and cruft. Also, it's a big poopy. Kill it.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:17, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Politicians (mostly from author's parents' years, in the Clinton-Bush administrations) turned into memes and rambled about on the flimsy pretense that they were characters in a game. Spıke Ѧ 01:49 21-Jan-11
- so funny i forgot to laugh --Roman Dog Bird 06:23, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Hey, it's a shit GTA article! What are the odds? --UU - natter 10:20, Jan 21
- Yeah, kill all of them and whatnot. → I am greatSoup? 20:57 21-Jan-11 ←
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Nom I am ashamed to say that I, Mcpee, created this game a very long time ago. This was back in my n00b days. -- 00:58, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Big poopy Kill it.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:03, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Your wish... shall be granted McPee. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 2155 EST 20 JAN 2011
- Delete. I normally don't vote on
Game: , but if this is what you want, I'm in. Spıke Ѧ 03:00 21-Jan-11
- Yes. Although if you think it's embarrassing, why bring it here where we'd all look at it? QVFD would be more discreet, as well...
1234 ~ 03:34, 21 January 2011
- Funny, until January 4, 2011, I was a noob. Just some newbie wandering around and posting shit. So back when I really meant 'retire', I meant retire from doing shit humour and go into doing real humour. -- 18:32, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Silly Maniac mcpee → I am greatSoup? 20:17 21-Jan-11 ←
|
Comments |
- You can list your own work on QVFD and save people the trouble of voting, you know. pillow talk 01:41, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- But it will spoil the fun--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:43, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, Mcpee is essentially the only contributor. They'd do it. Spıke Ѧ 01:45 21-Jan-11
- No, that's gay. QVFD is no fun and is for noobs--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:47, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Please, get rid of the game. It's sooooo embarrasing. -- 02:31, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Plus, it's sister game, GOD 76 was long deleted. These games are seriously some of my shittiest of my time in Uncyclopedia. -- 02:33, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (2) |
- Strong keep. Some people just don't get it. XD – (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 21:17, 20 January 2011
- You are welcome to spell it out for us. Spıke Ѧ 01:21 21-Jan-11
- Keep Not seeing the problem here. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:41, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Incomprehensible, no real overall concept. Lots of bad sex jokes. Survived VFD in 2008, basically because it was judged not to be "harmful". We hopefully have higher standards now. Coronium 17:12, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
- "conjuring computer game consoles from his anus." Awful intro; this scrambling of the icons of Christianity with sex jokes and gay jokes needs something more to be funny, such as humor. Spıke Ѧ 17:24 20-Jan-11
- Delete. Having no reason is offensive in my book as this means that the useless article is a freeloading degenerate. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:06, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I sure we have at least half a dozen articles that cover the subject better. --Mn-z 21:59, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
- KILL IT WITH FIRE! Very much per Mr. Mnz -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 2203 EST 20 JAN 2011
- Delete. Sorry, it's a mess. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:49, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Somebody explain this article to me I really don't get it. -- 19:46, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept in Aug'08, 4-2. Mhaille called it "inoffensive." There was no affirmative defense of the article, but two voters asserted that it was not vanity by someone named Xris, er, Chris. Spıke Ѧ 17:21 20-Jan-11
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Unfunny, it's even worse than the previously huffed article. As an editor at the Call of Duty wiki who doesn't like Black Ops, I should find this funniest out of anyone, yet fail to see one aspect of how it could be classed as funny. Smuff [kthnxbai]
- Yeah, this never really made it off the ground... it's now excessively long, unfocussed, unfunny, rather irritating, and guuuh.
1234 ~ 21:31, 19 January 2011
- "THIS SHIT IS WACK!!!!!" This gamecruft is interminable listcruft. Spıke Ѧ 22:43 19-Jan-11
- KILL IT WITH FIRE! Whoever is responsible for this shit needs to be drawn and quartered. No redeeming value. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 2155 EST 19 JAN 2011
- Bigger poopy I love the game, thats why I hate this article. kill it.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:05, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm pretty shure I ICUed this when it was still new. I don't know when the author decided it was ready to take that off. Anyway, it's bad. -- 01:36, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
- It's not bad, it's big poopy. Get it right, dumbass.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:41, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Here as in Dark matter Anon (evidently not the same one) saw fit to replace the first definitional word with "Nigger." What a card. Spıke Ѧ 22:43 19-Jan-11
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Mega Keep. In the drive to purge the website of the horrifying banality of the Chuck Norris jokes, it may, in my humble opnion lead to articles being deleted solely because they aren't super helarious and have too many Chuck Norris jokes. This is one of the few articles where the CN jokes made me laugh. Further more, anyone who lives in Europe will find atleast a few of the Spanish references funny (if not VERY funny). Mega keep. --Shabidoo 02:45, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. I counted 53 uses of the name "Chuck Norris" "Chuck" and "Norris". It works out to 5.92 instances per kilobyte of article. To put that in perspective, on the article Chuck Norris, its only 2.41 instances per kilobyte. --Mn-z 02:29, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Presumably Spain was the set of one of the many Chuck Norris action flicks, but I can't find it. At any rate, force-fitting Norris to Spain (or to the Basque region) is arbitrary--there's nothing to suggest a real-world reason or provide anything but a springboard to ramble. Spıke Ѧ 02:48 18-Jan-11
- Delete.Basically not funny at all besides everything else. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:57, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- The problem isn't so much the overabundance of Chuck Norris so much that it's dumb... and the overabundance is a part of why. It is, however, a complete coincidence that Chuck Norris stuff usually tends to be dumb. Or something. I forgot what I was saying. Random, much?
1234 ~ 01:43, 19 January 2011
- Delete. The title is intriguing, and I may reappropriate it for my own purposes someday. The article leaves much to be desired, though. As of now, despite the title, no redeeming value. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 2205 EST 19 JAN 2011'
- Huge poopy Kill it.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:07, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (4) |
- Rewritten. I can think of several. Spıke Ѧ 14:01 16-Jan-11
- It has words. I mean, it's all right.
1234 ~ 02:01, 17 January 2011
- Eh, it's ok --Dancing dude 18:01, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Dark humor. Not really. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:22, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. It's stupid now, and I can't think of a way to make dark matter funny to the general public. Loopygrumpkins 04:24, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Then you've never been to Flint, Michigan. Spıke Ѧ 14:01 16-Jan-11
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
Delete. I hate it so much I put delete in the keep area. -- 03:37, January 20, 2011 (UTC) Did you forget you already voted? Spıke Ѧ 17:27 20-Jan-11
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. And on and on. An article in the Wacky War genre, for furries. Spıke Ѧ 01:40 18-Jan-11
- Delete. As it proclaims in the opening paragraph "If you actually took the time to read this, skip the next part, it is complete rubbish." --Mn-z 02:20, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Fur bollocks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:58, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. BAD. -- 00:29, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh? Okay, I'll be honest and admit I, er... got distracted by one of the pictures and had trouble actually reading it, but... eh?
1234 ~ 01:40, 19 January 2011
- EXTERMINATE! Of course it would result in my mother. And Captain Planet did something. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:58, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 9
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep You all don't know quality. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:29, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- fucking beautiful --Roman Dog Bird 22:33, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (11) |
- Delete. Unfunny, ugly and potentially offensive nonsense. Coronium 18:39, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. But we like "offensive." Except that, in this article, it is in the service of nothing--as are all the other words on the page. Spıke Ѧ 18:42 18-Jan-11
- Delete. You found a winner, I mean loser, here. What a page to send on the road. Aleister 18:43 18-1-'11
- EXTERMINATE! Holy shit this has been around since 2007? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:58, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- I like Sissy McDeathDeath's killing percentage -- 21:01, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Why two deaths? Odd... --Dancing dude 21:30, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 22:13, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh?
1234 ~ 01:44, 19 January 2011
- Delete. Did have one unusual idea - a Vatican wrestling team - but otherwise, a bucket contender. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:27, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. per all of the above. --Dame 11:12, January 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete... with one caveat: If this was intended as satire of a horrible article, then this is hilarious and should be kept for posterity. Otherwise it is just sad and should be annihilated. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ
- Delete. DELETE! --/Лёва Корова 12:08, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
2200 EST 19 JAN 2011
|
Comments |
Darn. I liked Sissy McDeathDeath's killing percentage better when it was poop. -- 15:49, January 20, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Chuck Norris and pwnage. pillow talk 17:51, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- I can't even tell what is and isn't vandalism, here.
1234 ~ 18:18, 14 January 2011
- I could, in three places, now fixed. Spıke Ѧ 20:51 14-Jan-11
- Delete. per hyperbole. --Mn-z 03:24, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. My father described teaching as: "Tell 'em what you're going to tell 'em; tell 'em; then tell 'em what you told 'em." This author tells us he's going to bore us, bores us, and then admits he probably bored us. I held off earlier because it had a photo and it wasn't as bad as his other piece. Spıke Ѧ 02:44 17-Jan-11
|
Comments |
- Having written this, which is no award-winner, Anon should not have played double-or-nothing by starting Bearcat cavalry. Spıke Ѧ 20:51 14-Jan-11
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- I suppose there is an idea here, but the implementation is so terrible I've no idea if it's even a good one. Seems a meandery, poorly written and conceived cat-based theology.
1234 ~ 17:47, 14 January 2011
- Stupid. pillow talk 18:08, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. basically, it appears the author thought that babbling on a random and adding images of cats is funny. --Mn-z 03:15, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This occasionally funny paean to the cuteness of cats is now superseded by Aleister's revitalized Kitten Cookbook. Redirect this there, if you must. Spıke Ѧ 13:53 16-Jan-11
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:18, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Yes, yes, I'll vote delete. Just put that down, okay mister?
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (5) |
- Fixed. Intro, despite annoying jumble of the Marvel Comics mutant and the Jim Henson plush toy, shows us where it's going: Cuddly school propaganda to ease adolescent boys' fears of becoming totally simian. After the intro, collapses into unfunny goofiness. Needs a companion article designed to convince young girls that breast expansion will eventually play itself out. Hindenburg? Spıke Ѧ 21:24 14-Jan-11
- Keep. I like it. --~ 09:27, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- It has improved. <insert unhelpful comment that it could be better here>
1234 ~ 01:54, 17 January 2011
- Keep. This is actually kinda funny. -- 01:58, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Rowr is beast for keep. --Dancing dude 18:02, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Patent unfunniness about a muppet, I think. pillow talk 17:58, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
Is it? At any rate, it lost me. And what does it need an intermission for?
1234 ~ 18:29, 14 January 2011
- It doesn't. Author believes he is "paid by page count." Spıke Ѧ 21:25 14-Jan-11
|
Comments |
- I've now made the intro fun, removed the "intermission," and made the remainder borderline English
that I have no idea what to do with. Spıke Ѧ 23:48; 16:14 15-Jan-11
- Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 08:18, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Very strong keep. I see no point in deleting this. It has a few chuckles, and there are so many articles far more worth deleting than this. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)
- Keep. Shabidoo suggests elsewhere he will ride in and rewrite some/all of the page. Keep for his future slaying of the bearded dragon. Aleister 4:38 15 1 '11
- It was suggested that I rewrite it ... and after looking at it and thinking, I honestly wouldn´t do that much good for it. Im not so attached to this that I would be hateful if its deleted, I just don't think it really needs being deleted. It's cute, not unfunny, not stupidly stupidd! --Shabidoo 16:42, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Did an edit sweep to cut out the fat and left a lean cow to build up with spit and grind polish. Aleister 13:57 16 1 '11
- Okay. Spıke Ѧ 02:35 17-Jan-11
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. The quote made me laugh, but it's not enough to save this pointless article. pillow talk 17:56, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Unless someone wants to turn this into some actual, applicable article, I see no reason for it to stay.
1234 ~ 18:27, 14 January 2011
- Delete. I could see a decent article on the subject. However, I don't think the current content will be helpful. The only real joke in here is gamecruft. Also, no one is going to notice that we don't have an article on this subject. --Mn-z 03:38, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Has a good premise, quote, and pic. Anyone want to make it a real live boy? Aleister 18:59 14 1 '11
- Go fish. Pogona barbata made me laugh. Species-by-species thumbnails needs to be developed into something other than listcruft, and final section is classic gamecruft. 21:08 PS--A stubby Wikipedia article tells us that pogona barbata and bearded dragon are Australian lizards--so the article is about something real, and not entirely "pointless." Could this be a mainspace job for one of our new Australian UnNews stars? Spıke Ѧ 21:17 14-Jan-11
- Keprit. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:20, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -5
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. Actually, it's not that bad. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:06, 16 January 2011
- Copy-edited. This article is relevant, necessarily a list of things we've never heard of and don't care about, and so I give it absolution on being called listcruft. It invites mini-essays motivated by nothing more than a pun, and it's done pretty well despite red-links and occasional memes. The road to excellence is clear. Spıke Ѧ 16:12 16-Jan-11 post-edited
- I rather like it. Can't be arsed to look see how much it has changed, though.
1234 ~ 01:39, 17 January 2011
- Keep. I have added a few tweaks. Has a few funny ideas here, worth keeping. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:43, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- It's purty good --Dancing dude 17:59, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. pretty unfunny list. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:02, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Recalled, it's somewhat better now. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:51, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Worse than bandcruft. ~ 08:45, Jan 16, 2011
- Delete. Wikipedia has nothing but a song and album by Michael Jackson, but I assume this is a band somewhere--and if the article said where, you would know how badly it violates UN:CM. Bottom line, all the members love gay porn, dildos, and butt sex. Spıke Ѧ 14:04 16-Jan-11
- Kerkill He raped Jessi Slaughter, guize. He should be thrown in prison cause she was 11 and now she's 12 and I made an 11 year old cry. ED does this so much better. Trust me, I helped write the ED page on BOTDF. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 14:52, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It's poopie. -- 02:03, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Not even an article. I mean, it has some words and stuff, but...
1234 ~ 04:14, 17 January 2011
- EXTERMINATE! If this shit is what people can interpret from a humble song, I'd kill myself if someone did a Blood in Our Wells article the same way. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:17, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. What Magic man said. --Dancing dude 18:00, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It not only is poopie, it smells like poopie too. -- 00:12, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 8
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (8) |
- Delete. Pointed to in the See also of Beast, this is the mother of all lists. Spıke Ѧ 02:19 17-Jan-11
- OMG My brain just exploded. Like, my skull is still intact but there is brain splattered all over the inside... Waaay too much information. -- 02:30, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Looking through it, I can't even figure out why I should care...
1234 ~ 04:18, 17 January 2011
- Delete. a slab of something. Not sure what. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:03, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I remember the actual show. The idea of Optimus Prime being a gorilla still makes me chuckle. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:53, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- total trash (the actual show fucking kick assed though) --Roman Dog Bird 17:28, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It looks like all the worst writers in the world came together to write this. Ya, it's that bad. --Dancing dude 17:56, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- UGH Rape plus masturbation plus furries plus Transformers equals DELETE. Simsilikesims 06:04, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- 2011 cruft I'm not even shure what this is about. But I know it's not funny. -- 02:11, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia mostly points to a Metro station in Tehran, Iran; so this is either about nothing, or it's vanity/cyberbullying. Spıke Ѧ 02:23 17-Jan-11
- This kind of fails. Deletionary per SPIKE.
1234 ~ 04:15, 17 January 2011
- Delete. Nonsense on rollerskates. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:04, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Lol wut? --Dancing dude 17:57, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
- two grown men pooping on each other. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:19, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (2) |
- Well, I'm actually okay with it. It's coherent enough, and amusing at times. Heavy-handed at others, but that could be fixed. pillow talk 18:07, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. per above, sorta amusing in places. --Mn-z 22:19, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (7) |
- Kerkill Offensive... I'm kidding. It's just really fucking unfunny and probably won't be getting better. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 05:09, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Weak Delete. The intro's sermon on the threat to democracy of weird opinions is preachy. Listing the obviously difficult aspects of being a devout Muslim and expecting the resulting ridicule to be funny is not enough. Islam#Relation to Judaism is a list of attributes of Islam done with cleverness. Spıke Ѧ 05:52 14-Jan-11
- Delete. Basically just a list, the title says it all.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:34, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Smite. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:50, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Some of it's vaguely amusing, but it's just what it is. No real take on things; not even an article.
1234 ~ 16:50, 14 January 2011
- Delete Lists are cheating and lazy and cheating etc... And this disrespects that cock Jesus and the other one. mAttlobster. (hello) 00:55, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:17, January 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Let's be honest with ourselves, wouldn't it be easier to list why we SHOULD be Muslims? We'd at least have the appearance that we're trying to be funny; as is, it looks like we're just giving stupid reasons. Just sayin. Larrythefunkyferret 03:02, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This has been Tastelessness Week on UnNews, from the Arizona shooting to Testicles falling off to Sneezing snot everywhere. Spıke Ѧ 05:52 14-Jan-11
- I think it should just say "There aren't any, except maybe the spontaneous combustion." —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:48, 14 January 2011
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (5) |
- It may be random, incoherent and crude, but boy is it funny! --Scofield 20:52, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. With a bit of work this could be very good indeed. I think there are planety of amusing bits in there.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:36, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- S'okay. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:14, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Made me laugh. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:29, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I can't disagree with the Mnbzzer, but for some reason, this one is funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:08, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Its really 3 unrelated stories, 2 centering around buttsex and the other being about Tom Cruise, Chuck Norris, and Oscar Wilde creating the universe, with a cameo by Paris Hilton. It also has an incorrect list of characters at the top. --Mn-z 00:51, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Coprologically speaking this is...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:50, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Per Mdngdhgcvbx.
1234 ~ 01:57, 14 January 2011
|
Comments |
- Kept by Olipro who didn't point who kept it grumble grumble grumble ~ 09:18, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Typical sex jackoff TV noob humor. I dot like it and niobody does. pillow talk 17:45, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Is this a real show? Either way, what is it? Why is it funny? Why do we care? Except it doesn't answer any of these...
1234 ~ 18:12, 14 January 2011
- Delete. Beanie Babies was a line of limited-production plush dolls. Wikipedia puts it at "around the late 1990s" and doesn't mention it having a TV spinoff. This article is an excuse to ramble about the personalities, manufactured by the author, of various child toys. This is either a vehicle for reality-based allegory (here, it isn't); or it's Randumbo. Spıke Ѧ 18:20 14-Jan-11
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 03:12, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Junior Uncyclopedia. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:52, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Another meme-strewn shitload of fuck. pillow talk 17:49, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Meme-strewn, indeed. Does it even have a proper idea to it?
1234 ~ 18:15, 14 January 2011
- Most people are stupid. No, Lyrithya, it doesn't. Spıke Ѧ 20:44 14-Jan-11
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 03:23, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Eh? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:46, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Anyone in the mood to nuke another shitty 2005-era stub? pillow talk 17:48, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- If only random made for funny... although content might help, for that matter. Not the content that it has, though.
1234 ~ 18:14, 14 January 2011
- Delete. A single paragraph that proves nothing except that the author is good at free-association and bad at coding links to articles that actually exist. Spıke Ѧ 20:42 14-Jan-11
- Delete. the text looks like "filler" to get a silly picture on the wiki. Unfortunately, the silly picture isn't even that funny. --Mn-z 03:17, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Randumbo with wings. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:48, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -5
|
Keep (5) |
- The soup pic gave me my biggest laugh of the week. I'll take this one, and fix 'er up real good. Meow. Aleister 18:47 14 1 '11
- Okay, I'll give Aleister his chance, but if this isn't funny within a week or so, I'm voting for Sog for WotY. pillow talk 18:49, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- A week? In a week it could get to feature quality, the same as Pearl necklace but SPIKE won't nom it (he hated that I was working on it. Hee hee.) Aleister 20:22 14 1 '11
- I whistle in the dark past the graveyard of this dead article. If only I was a cat person rather than a Red Panda person. The pic is still one of the funniest things I've seen recently.Aleister 00:04 15 1 '11
- But why is this really so worth deleting? Does this send people running away going "dear lord, never read uncyclopedia, lets start a holly Jehad against it?" That was Shabidoo as well.
- You've read it after I've started in on a long rewrite, and will work more over the weekend. And I see you're going to tackle the bearded dragon, so I'll go vote save on that one. Clysdales to you and yours! Aleister 4:34 15 1 '11
- Whaa? This is half-featured to me. --~ 17:31, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Well done, Aleister. Hope you're not done, though.
1234 ~ 22:02, 15 January 2011
- Eek, no. Have to get into the digging up of the book and then the curse a bit. Then polishing. I just came from there, so am in a state of writer's excitement where I have to strangle things just to calm down. There's one now! Aleister 22:07 Doc King's Birthday '11
|
Delete (0) |
#Nice and, er, random... whole lot of history, not much on why the thing is amusing or even here. Well, relatively speaking, not actually much to it in the first place.
1234 ~ 17:52, 14 January 2011
#Yeah, the problem is that the joke is in the title and there's nowhere to go from there, so... we get.. paleontology and Calcutta. pillow talk 18:09, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- That's just bad writing. Also, what? Not even sure what the idea here is.
1234 ~ 17:55, 14 January 2011
- Yep, pretty awful attempt to feel like part of something by adding to Uncyclopedia's early (and not very funny) kitten-murder movement. pillow talk 18:10, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Serious kitten-huffing talk is interrupted by Dick Cheney, teen masturbation, and Canada. Spıke Ѧ 21:00 14-Jan-11
- Delete. I can't even tell what this article is about. Apparently, it has something to do with killing kittens and weight loss. Is the article saying that masturbation causes weight-loss and kitten deaths, or is it assuming that kitten huffing causes weight-loss? I can't tell because the opening paragraph was hijacked by a poorly written jab at Dick Cheney. --Mn-z 03:34, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Really doesn't make any sense. That's the only thing funny about this article. --Scofield 09:21, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Major topic, not too bad.--Sycamore (Talk) 20:16, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Eh?
1234 ~ 18:10, 14 January 2011
- Delete and list on UN:REQ; this isn't the article we're looking for. pillow talk 18:15, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Everybody was kung-fu fighting. Except Costello didn't do that one, did he? You don't honor a rock 'n' roll icon with randumbo, but by starting over. But I'll flip if Aleister in Chains, our most senior remaining musician (and he's only a drummer!) wants to take a little time and replace the song lyrics with Costello song lyrics. Spıke Ѧ 21:50 14-Jan-11
- Er, I'm a semi-professional musician and I wrote four featured UnTunes, and I've been here a year and a half longer than Aleister, but, yeah, I ain't mad or anything. pillow talk 22:57, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, didn't know. You could do it too; this article doesn't need to be great, it just needs to relate to Costello. Spıke Ѧ 23:19 14-Jan-11
- There are worse articles. But Elvis Costello deserves better. --Sog1970 22:59, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Whether it gets deleted or kept, the rewriter still has to start from scratch to make this any good. ~ 09:32, Jan 15, 2011
- Delete Better to have no page on a major topic than a blank page. This has no relation to the great man except using his name. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:17, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- List of randoms since 2005.
1234 ~ 18:07, 14 January 2011
- Delete. There's a few amusing lines in there, but I don't see this going anywhere. pillow talk 18:14, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This belongs in someone's Sandbox as they work to achieve mastery of list formatting, using random contents like nonsense year numbers. Indeed, Hyperbole, my mind instantly wanted to know, "What about the 'unknown universe'"? and he touched that one. And it isn't going anywhere. Spıke Ѧ 21:46 14-Jan-11
- Delete. listy and not going anywhere. --Mn-z 03:54, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Yes. Listy and random. ~ 09:36, Jan 15, 2011
- Delete. Return to a black hole. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:31, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- "Bane traveled back in time to now and is currently a anthro bisexual squirrel with a butch haircut. he can generally be found in France, Belgium, England or Pluto."
1234 ~ 18:05, 14 January 2011
- Typical shitty article with big random numbers, cartoons jumping into the article, etc. pillow talk 18:13, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The article seems to exist as a celebration of the process of writing goofy little articles. Only--Who or what is Bane? Spıke Ѧ 21:43 14-Jan-11
- Kerkill Yeah, nothing worth keeping here. Bane, for those of you who don't know, is a Batman villain. Probably one of the strongest and smartest, he broke Bruce Wayne's back which fucked things up pretty badly for awhile. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:35, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- I did not, thanks; but I only meant that the article isn't even coherent enough to give or invent an explanation of this. Spıke Ѧ 22:57 14-Jan-11
- Delete. vanity or random, not sure which, perhaps a bit of both. Also, "Bane traveled back in time to now and is currently a anthro bisexual squirrel with a butch haircut." --Mn-z 03:50, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Random word soup. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:34, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Cool story, bro...? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 23:15, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Nonsensical stub about non-huffable kittens... or something.
1234 ~ 18:04, 14 January 2011
- Delete. We trimmed back so much Wilde and Norris... I'm glad someone's doing something about the shit stain that is kittens. pillow talk 18:12, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Kitten huffing will live on in celebration of the meme of that era. Kitten wars, kitten factories, kitten Congressmen, are reflected-glory articles that hang their hat on the meme as protection against their own huffing, a protection that has now expired. The only illustration in this un-path-breaking article is proud of its irrelevance. Spıke Ѧ 21:40 14-Jan-11
- Delete. Kittens, the new Oscar Wilde --Mn-z 22:27, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Spike:Meme Hunter. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:36, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 13:12, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Not funny but just stupid... unclear what the premise is save for some in-jokery.
1234 ~ 18:01, 14 January 2011
- Ugh. Those fucking pictures again?? Also, the article sucks. pillow talk 18:12, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- It has been accepted by widely. This article needs to be cited in How To Be Cute And Not Funny At All. A stubby article on Wacky War that grasps onto meme photos for artificial support. Spıke Ѧ 21:36 14-Jan-11
- I've written better cute and not funny at all articles. *shifty eyes*
1234 ~ 00:05, 15 January 2011
- Delete. To hell with your cats and to hell with you. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 00:19, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. image vomit of over-used images. --Mn-z 03:46, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. War on Crap. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:38, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The pictures were how I found most of these... strange, what likes to use such ones.
1234 ~ 18:46, 14 January 2011
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Every time Uncyclopedia deletes a mention of cartoon rape, an angel gets its wings. pillow talk 18:00, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Say something is complete rubbish; that must be funny, right?
1234 ~ 18:36, 14 January 2011
- Delete. If author thinks this show sucked (Sucked so bad.) then why did he watch every frickin' episode (at least once) in order to be able to write a parody synopsis? Spıke Ѧ 21:31 14-Jan-11
- Delete. fancruft and rape. --Mn-z 03:44, January 15, 2011
- Delete. This is a record of a misspent youth. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:40, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. "'It sucks.' says everyone on Beast Machines." Really describes the entire nature of the article. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:24, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Another wacky war story... it's just wacky, contradicts itself, isn't even well written, etc... and no, the older revisions aren't any better. Goes back to 2005.
1234 ~ 17:59, 14 January 2011
- Ugh. Those fucking pictures again?? Also, the article sucks. pillow talk 18:11, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Some of the pictures are cute, but it feels as though they, the Wacky War theme, the nonsense year numbers, etc., were used to breathe artificial life into an article that has no real reason to exist. They would be funnier if used sparingly on a small number of articles that people would actually read. Spıke Ѧ 21:28 14-Jan-11
- Delete. looking at this, the images seem to make up 75% of the humor, As clearly They just wanted to have of collection of images showing cats with guns, as The writing is just "Jokes" About kitten huffing, and It's so stupid it's hard not to hate it. - Another n00b
- Delete. basically an image vomit. Granted, image vomits can be funny, but the text is worse than useless. Perhaps we might want to create a gallery of kittens. --Mn-z 22:31, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 00:21, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- A cat residing in Longmont, Colorado... instead of having apparently anything to do with anything, far as I can tell, this is nothing more than a nonsensical war dealy that... eh, just read it.
1234 ~ 17:30, 14 January 2011
- Delete. There could theoretically be a joke about CAT5 ethernet cable being a cat... although I don't see it. Anyway, this is not that joke. pillow talk 18:06, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Article by committee? Can we get them to talk to each other? Strong whiff of vanity (my cat? my daughter the volleyball player?) with an incompatible rant against John Kerry. Spıke Ѧ 18:14 14-Jan-11
- Delete. doesn't seem to have a purpose. I think its based on the joke that Cat5 sorta sounds like a spy organization, but that's not funny and it comes of as an uber-cliche "cute thing is EBIL!!"-style article. --Mn-z 22:23, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. - I agree that Ethernet cables need to be discussed somewhere on Uncyc, but the current article is of no help. (Redacted my comment as it is factually incorrect) --Pentium5dot1 t~^_^~c 04:00, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:54, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
I seem to remember that a previous article at this title did mention Ethernet cables, but that version was deleted. Take to UN:REQ perhaps? Would it be helpful to userfy that previous version to give potential article writers some guidance? --Pentium5dot1 t~^_^~c 03:58, January 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Gave it a slight tweek, but it was OK before and an interesting take on recent news. Maybe the onslaught of first persons impeded on this, please give it a second or third or tenth read. I categorized the nice picture too! Aleister 18:00 12 1 '11
- Keep. Don't think this should be here.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:41, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. - I'm tempted to record this as an audio. – (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 18:36, 13 January 2011
|
Delete (3) |
Delete. The third leg of last night's Trifecta of planting crap on UnNews. There is no rule against writing an UnNews on a theme that Funnybony handled much better on 7-Jan. But: "Awershum"? Sounds like someone is drunk. Details? "Bayjing"? Fighter nicknamed "Jesus"? Pop tarts? Dick Cheney? There is no explanation of anything; it is pure Randumbo. Spıke Ѧ 11:54 12-Jan-11 Rescinded per crisis intervention by Lyrithya and Aleister; now borderline keepable. Spıke Ѧ 23:47 12-Jan-11
- Now that I'm awake, I'm inclined to agree. Very random, not really making any point or major joke that I can tell... 'only funny for drunk people' might well be accurate. As for the 'Awershum', seems to be an attempt to make fun of accents.
1234 ~ 15:32, 12 January 2011
- HAHAHA No. --Dancing dude 15:34, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I fail to see any humor or real concept in this article. --Mn-z 01:06, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- SPIKE I'm not really happy with you nominating stuff from UnNews on here in this fashion - still less so when it's only a day old. I will bring this up before admins as it's unacceptable conduct on VFD. You are not an admin and the trust you've garnered on this page does not give you special rights on deletions, or the use of VFD.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:45, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- And I imagine you ran straight from here to Mordillo's talk page, where we had already been discussing the proper response to articles like this for hours. I am "not really happy" either--receiving needless threats from someone who, every other week, tells me I am personalizing things. Spıke Ѧ 23:47 12-Jan-11
- Hey - chill there is no 'threat' implied, you are being bit irrational. I only commented to Hyperbole, I didn't read the discussion or huge drama fest that has blown up there and on Kip's page. I think it is often very (perhaps too?) personal with you, and also very politisised - hence a few jabs about it, as you seem 'serious' over the trivial. VFD is my domain until otherwise, I'm trying to make sure that it stays nice and operates to everyones best interest as far as I can, that includes writers who end up with their work on here. Once again chill - I'll pour some tea or something:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 11:41, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
- I think I'll go ahead and accuse you both of being irrational and needlessly bitey at each other; either of you, or neither or both may now bite me as well at your leisure.
1234 ~ 18:17, 13 January 2011
- Why do you stick up for this guy so much?--Sycamore (Talk) 20:39, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
- SPIKE, what? All I did was fix the formatting, and before any of this. Aleister's clarification was just that, clarification, but the drunk in me adores the piece. The sober thing in me still thinks it's dumb. I'm sinking back into drunk mode... clarity does rather help when drunk...
1234 ~ 00:03, 13 January 2011
- Voting closed. Was unnecessary to begin with. ~ 09:51, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. The best thing about this game is that it is tiny, so I didn't have to suffer for long. • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Wednesday, 02:47, Jan 12 2011 UTC
- Yes.
1234 ~ 03:41, 12 January 2011
- Epic... --Dancing dude 15:40, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.Unless I come back from a party, and i'm really, really, really stoned...then i'll play your game. -- 22:56, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. per above and whatnot. --Mn-z 00:53, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I know a gone case when I see one. --Scofield 15:19, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Pointless. • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Wednesday, 02:34, Jan 12 2011 UTC
- Yes.
1234 ~ 02:36, 12 January 2011
- That was so funny I forgot to laugh --Dancing dude 15:43, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mn-z 01:08, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Serves little purpose other than asking some obvious GK questions. Take this to a trivia site, please. --Scofield 20:46, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Resembles a game of trivial pursuit. Yawn. Also, if you get all the questions right, it takes you back to the beginning in an infinite loop. Whoopie. Simsilikesims 03:45, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
It would be a bummer if this whole concept was deleted. It's not unfunny and it could become something great. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)
- What concept?
1234 ~ 03:43, 12 January 2011
- The concept of being a making a game for fucktards. -- 22:58, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep....you know the length of time that you actually spend typing out a full explanation of why something like this should be deleted could actually be used to make some minor amendments to the article that would make it more than passable. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Started in 2005, all subsequent edits are by I.P.Anon. The article is three-quarters a list of components of driving-to-endanger that are supposedly obligatory in Rhode Island. The attempt to explain why Rhode Island should be notorious, except by being nestled in a region of states with notoriously bad drivers, has produced poorly written front matter with an agency with contrived acronym, and of course a template telling you not to expect it to be good. Spıke Ѧ 22:47 9-Jan-11
- Some of the laws themselves are funny, as is the notion of a state's laws being a wiki in the first, but an actual article that does not make, especially with so poor an implementation as this.
1234 ~ 02:35, 11 January 2011
- Cruft • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Wednesday, 02:53, Jan 12 2011 UTC
- I don't like this. Nuff said. --Dancing dude 15:45, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Nuff to vote. Not nuff to state your point (either to guide other voters or anyone who in fact wants to fix this dog). Spıke Ѧ 16:11 12-Jan-11
- Delete. I don't associate Rhode Island with bad driving for any particular reason. New York City is commonly associated with overly aggressive driving, but such an article would turn into a "100 reasons why Picard is better Kirk"-style article. I.e. listy, filled with old cliche jokes, repeats the same half dozen concepts several times, et cetera. --Mn-z 01:19, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't get this... But I guess that's expected with a template like {{Familiarity}}. -- 01:34, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- [Mhaille], the argument that some decision is not the very best use of our time is the generic argument, used in every legislature, by advocates who run out of real arguments. What about the article? Spıke Ѧ 15:13 12-Jan-11
- SPIKE, you yourself redo many articles (which gets a very positive nod from me if you cared), and in many ways you go by Mhaille's argument much of the time. The fact that you do not phrase it as such does not change that, you only differ in that you would prefer that articles are brought here, in the glare of the community and then move in to improve them. If you simply disagree that this article is not worth saving - leave it at that.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:51, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- I was objecting to a line of reasoning, not expressing any opinion on the relative value of repair versus discard. We both celebrate a good repair job. Rhode Island Driving Laws doesn't deserve one. Masshole is not a side-splitter, but does the same job better. Spıke Ѧ 23:52 12-Jan-11
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (6) |
- Big keep. --Shabidoo 05:56, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep - Better question: How is this in any way, shape, or form a copy of what I wrote? The only similarity is that it's written in the form of "Something happened to me, the author, today," which I'm almost positive has been done many times before in UnNews, if only I weren't too lazy to search the archives. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 06:34, Jan. 12, 2011
- Keep. Lulwut? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:49, 12 January 2011
- Keep Per it being good, just like Kip's article, and per it being ineligible for VFD. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:16, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Cuz... I wrote it. Anyway, I hope you understand that I made up every single thing in there. And yes, Dexter (can I call you Dexter?) is right. It's ineligible for VFD. -- 15:07, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I sneezed once too. --Dancing dude 15:36, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- This one's pretty much a copy in method of the previous, but without the testicles. Again, how is this funny?
1234 ~ 05:48, 12 January 2011
- Delete. It is a copy in that it puts on UnNews something that obviously doesn't belong there. Spıke Ѧ 11:49 12-Jan-11
|
Comments |
- Type
[[UnNews:I and auto-complete will guide you to many first-person articles written in the past. Nevertheless, stories that aren't about news and don't read like news should not be in UnNews. There has to be some link; otherwise, you are just using our Recent news list to advertise your article--which author only afterward submitted for Pee Review, because he knows it's crap too and/or as a device to technically protect it from deletion. Spıke Ѧ 13:25 12-Jan-11
- Actually no. I put it in unnews because that's part of the joke. Like you said "Who cares?" exactly. That's the point. And why did I submit it for Pee Review? Because it's my policy. Any article that I write will go on Pee Review. Not because I think it's crap. Or to protect it from deletion. But because it's my article writing policy. -- 15:14, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- This vote is closed, nomination for VFD when an article is less than a day old? ~ 16:09, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -5
|
Keep (7) |
- Strong Keep. It made me laugh way more than most unnews. It is not that different than some other random news articles. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Shabidoo (talk • contribs)
- Keep - That was fast. My testicles aren't even cold yet. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 06:32, Jan. 12, 2011
- Ineligible nom Wut? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 07:09, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Lulwut? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:49, 12 January 2011
- Keep. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Keep. Saw this last night. l&l, very funny. As for news, is there a section of UnNews for Commentary/Editorial? This would fit into a first-person account of a news event. Aleister 12:11 12 1 '11
- Keep. (This big.) --Dancing dude 15:37, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Apparently it is funny because it involves testicles - does the presence of testicles inherently make things funny, or is there something else here? Or not? As it is, I cannot see how this is funny, nor does read it like UnNews, appear to actually satirise anything, or seem to exist for any reason other than for the shock value.
1234 ~ 05:48, 12 January 2011
- Oh, it's meant to satire something. ; ) -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 06:36, Jan. 12, 2011
- Then why won't you tell us what?
1234 ~ 06:43, 12 January 2011
- I like my pawns to stay in suspense. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 06:44, Jan. 12, 2011
- Delete. I challenged author Kip the Dip to explain the joke to me on his talk page, and he tries everything but. (The above is a brief example.) UnNews is humor that relates to the news; the {{Original}} tag is for when your UnNews doesn't relate to a specific Source but general themes, not absolution to break the rule entirely. The only humor in putting this on UnNews is the laugh the vandal gets when he "tags" the bridge abutment. The seven-day rule cannot apply to UnNews; when an article is that old, its entire effective life is over. Spıke Ѧ 11:49 12-Jan-11
|
Comments |
- This vote is closed, nomination for VFD when an article is less than a day old? ~ 16:10, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 8
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (8) |
- A game that can be politely described as "minimalist" and honestly described as "awful." Author hasn't done any work on it since September. Plus, though I "fixed" most of it before I realized all Game formats have actually radically changed, much of the remaining page formatting is awful, and all of the pictures are drawn from outside sources and probably leech bandwidth or something. All-in-all an effortless, jokeless, pointless mess. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:34, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 03:33, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
- That shit was gay. pillow talk 03:41, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:28, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Game Over I will play the game of deleting a game. What's the score? Aleister 12:54 11 1 '11
- Yes.
1234 ~ 14:49, 11 January 2011
- Delete.Oh god, is that game still there? Shit, that's from my early unfunny days. Delete it. And as a note, all the pictures are by me, at the time I didn't know how to upload photos on Uncyclopedia.-- 01:58, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Horrible. • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Wednesday, 02:34, Jan 12 2011 UTC
|
Comments |
It is a good game actually, but I think the plot and the name are a bit screwed up. I would delete this game, and do another one. -- 01:58, January 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 9
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (9) |
- Goddamn. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:10, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Memes and bull semen. No subject and no theme; second half is listcruft. Spıke Ѧ 00:21 11-Jan-11
- Time to start over. pillow talk 00:52, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
- I went in to see what could be saved and if the page could be fixed by backing up a truckload of word cement. Nope. Took a look at the list. The list is so unfunny and uncreative that the most boring person on Conservapedia could have done better. Drown it in jelly. Aleister 1:30 11 1 '11
- put the rod up my ass --Roman Dog Bird 03:52, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:35, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
- bull semen --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:12, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
- *bursts out laughing*
1234 ~ 02:35, 12 January 2011
- Tony Danza • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Wednesday, 02:51, Jan 12 2011 UTC
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. It made me smile. Not too bad.--Sycamore (Talk) 06:50, January 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Read up until the script, and it held my interest throughout with some funny there. Actually literate. Someone like Matfen or Black Flamingo can take this page and soar with it. I'll put in a few minutes now, to back up my vote with sweat and tears (not in that order) and although I only saw the film once. Aleister 1:34 11 1 '11
- Added pics and edits and quirky things nobody should be forced to see. Sycamore put his touch onto the page as well. Seems alright now. Aleister 12:55 11 1 '11
- Further reworked. Script is out, which Aleister didn't read and I trust Sycamore didn't laugh at; ridicule of the movie's "plot" is in. Spıke Ѧ 17:18 11-Jan-11
- I don't really 'laugh' at anything on here, I just try and assert my political beliefs via humourous articles. I also try to be a "Force of change" as well;-)--Sycamore (Talk) 17:24, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
- SPIKE and Aleister can keep arguing over the script, but it's keepable either way.
1234 ~ 02:22, 12 January 2011
- Shit Pickle Shit Pickle shit pickle, shit pickle
- Luurg, lurg luurg luuuuurg luuurg luuurg, luuurg luurg?
1234 ~ lurg:lurg, lurg Luuuuurg lurg
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. Reality-based humor about how the third Star Trek movie had no purpose but to tie up loose ends left by the second might be funny. What this is is a script full of fart jokes--or more to the point, empty of anything else. Spıke Ѧ 02:13 10-Jan-11
- Withdrawn. Prose is now downright clever. Script still sucks. Spıke Ѧ 13:00 11-Jan-11
- Whaz ya meanz it zuckes, Jim? I mean, Whaz ya means it suckes, Spike? (Farts into camera, lens gets all distorted and swampy) Aleizter 13:11 11 1 '11
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Makes no sense to me. --Scofield 16:02, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 23:03, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Not really seeing an article here.
1234 ~ 23:04, 8 January 2011
- Piling on. Originally Comment. Spıke Ѧ 14:16 10-Jan-11
|
Comments |
- Combing the history for a pre-vandalism version is useless. Quotes have been cleared away, but the super-long lists, the use of
<math> , and the prose typed into See also are evidence of editing by the incompetent, who will be back for more the moment after this article is saved. However, it could have a role to play, and it could start by putting some of the material here into better shape. 666 redirects here, so there's no point in having the page title include "(number)". Spıke Ѧ 16:17 8-Jan-11
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. Needs work, not huffing.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:50, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. I think there are some funny parts, and it isn't entirely randumb → I am greatSoup? 18:07 6-Jan-11 ←
- Weak Keep --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:46, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep It's not too bad. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:42, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep It's cute. --Shabidoo 01:29, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Is this worse than having no article about the Zune at all? Why, yes. Yes, it is. pillow talk 22:59, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, yeah. If someone manages worse, I want to see it. O_o Horrible presentation, not funny, etc.
1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:31, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Thoroughly unfunny--but, to answer Hyperbole's question, it might be a placeholder that is better than nothing, despite the nagging/chatting/cheerleading at the reader, and that "9000 Microsofties jizzing their pants in excitement" is the biggest punch line. Flipping Zune logo to get anuS is cute. Spıke Ѧ 23:49 5-Jan-11
- I'm scared.
1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:24, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. It is what it claims to be, an island off Britain, near Glasgow. No photos; more quaint than really funny; and parts read as dry as a complete spork. But not entirely crap. Spıke Ѧ 23:22 5-Jan-11
- Keep. Shows promise.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:41, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Obviously--Sycamore (Talk) 09:47, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. I don't understand this. I suspect there is nothing to understand. pillow talk 22:32, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
- If there is a humorous concept or take on the place here, I'm not seeing it. It's also just not well written and the use of links is nothing short of horrific... does try a few jokes, but they're sporadic and rather flat.
1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 20:50, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Any "promise" this article shows can easily be overlooked when considering the fact that it hasn't been meaningfully edited in two and a half years, and that edit was the article's creation. The only changes since it was originally written are the stupid links and a single sentence. It really doesn't have much value at all, and doesn't even try to be quirky or weird. Just goes on and on and on about nothing important. → I am greatSoup? 23:51 6-Jan-11 ←
|
Comments |
- Just to be clear: Did anyone actually laugh at anything contained in this article? pillow talk 18:50, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Nope.
1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 20:50, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- The closest I came was, on a second and slower reading, to identify frequent passages that could not have been true so must have been attempts at humor. Spıke Ѧ 21:25 6-Jan-11
- Awesome, this is kept. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 04:25, January 11, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (6) |
- Keep. Not very funny, but it is a real page about a real person that touches on real aspects of him, from rasta to, yes, iconichood. By all means, start here and improve. Spıke Ѧ 16:56 6-Jan-11
- I've edited it down and then a little back up again. Come on guys, vote keep for this page. Multiple Personality Aleister, I'll name this one "Dance Master Al" 21:05 6 1 '11
- Delete. It sucks.
1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:32, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, fine - if Aleister wants to work on it, I'll vote to let him. Bizzarely, Aleister is still listed as voting delete, and I don't even know what Lyrithya is doing. I dunno. pillow talk 22:39, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Adding to the confusion, of course. Why should events revolving a topic like this necessarily make sense?
1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 22:50, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Eh, seems like Al did alright cleaning it up. → I am greatSoup? 22:55 6-Jan-11 ←
- As you are kind of new and the token and the text indicate a For vote, I'll move it to the For column and adjust the counts. Spıke Ѧ 01:47 7-Jan-11
- I was ripping off Lyrithya, but okay. → I am greatSoup? 02:03 7-Jan-11 ←
- Pfft, copying silly people is the sort of thing that can get you banned. I should know. I've gotten banned for it before. After I'd already gotten banned for what I actually did, copying. And then I got banned again because this other fellow saw everyone else banning me and wanted in on the fun...
1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 02:07, 7 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, sir. It won't happen again, sir.→ I am greatSoup? 02:13 7-Jan-11 ←
- One other thing, though... since we are voting for deleting articles, shouldn't "For" mean that I am for its deletion? → I am greatSoup? 02:23 7-Jan-11 ←
- To eliminate any ambiguity, you should use Keep. or Delete.. Spıke Ѧ 02:28 7-Jan-11
- Strongest possible keep. You delete this, I'm gonna track down those responsible and sodomize them. Then Spang will take seconds.--Sycamore (Talk) 07:02, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Of course keep. Aleister 1:37 10 1 '11
|
Delete (2) |
Delete. A random, stupid page about an icon of music and iconichood, probably not even worth saving as a template or a placeholder. Kill it as dead as Marley himself (may Jah rise him from the dead and live to roll one again). Aleister 13:30 6 1 '11
Delete. This is truly shitty writing, and any decent page will inevitably begin by bulldozing it all under. I get a little frustrated with "completionists" who want to keep things truly embarrassing to the project just because in a perfect world we ought to have a page with that particular title. Burn it down and list it on UN:REQ. pillow talk 18:48, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- My vote to save this page is not part of any -ism but is explained above. Spıke Ѧ 18:57 6-Jan-11
- Sure. He exists and the page isn't complete patent nonsense. I would personally like to set the bar a little higher. pillow talk 18:59, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Bob Marley would want the bar higher too, if you catch my drift. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:01, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Kerkill Per Sycamore. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:47, January 10, 2011 (UTC)
- I've always known you wanted to have his baby. Spıke Ѧ 02:02 10-Jan-11
|
Comments |
- I did a one edit delete sweep, and some of the page is left, maybe enough to keep one or three sentences and start over. The topic should actually be a colonization, or done by someone who knows Marley and his music well (I just know the icon, not too much about his life). Maybe the Marley page could keep some of this and then be played as a spork (I've done one full spork recently, Todd Palin, and haven't looked at the Marley wikipedia page). Collab anyone? Aleister 19:30 6 1 '11
- That's much better, but it's still terrible. pillow talk 20:15, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes it is. Much better and terrible. Double delete with a cherry wedged in a little bit there, on top. Aleister 00:50 7 1 '11
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (2) |
- fuckin' nixon --Roman Dog Bird 22:54, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep.--Sycamore (Talk) 07:04, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. It appears that User:El cid1010 wrote himself a bit of a walled garden on ridiculous fictional places. This apparently inhabits the imaginary world that also contains the Dobsie Empire. pillow talk 18:40, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Group-huff. There is a Wixom semi-close to Keego Harbor, but this seems to be totally based on Richard Nixon. Mentions Checkers and Watergate, but the author's intention was not to exaggerate this egotist of a President but rather to manufacture an adversary for his other fictional nation. Spıke Ѧ 19:27 6-Jan-11
- Delete. Yeah, what they said... more dobsie crap → I am greatSoup? 20:42 6-Jan-11 ←
- Aye. Mmm, nonsensical.
1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:39, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Part of the writer's self serving universe which makes it impossible to improve or change. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:39, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Yep, this sucks! --Scofield 16:17, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. I guess we could call this a valiant effort that was just not a good idea from the beginning. pillow talk 18:35, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This doesn't have a point, it smells of cyber-bullying, it's not well-written, and pages should not try so hard to insult their readers. Spıke Ѧ 18:59 6-Jan-11
- What Spike said. Although the title could become something... it could.
1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:34, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Sounds more like "you don't have a face and you suck" to me. --Scofield 08:40, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 23:18, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The person that wrote this article does not have a face. -- 00:56, January 9, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (7) |
- Strong sentimental Keep This page! One of the first or maybe the first page I saw here which brought me to the site. I thought it absurdly wonderful that a made-up animal could be tied-in so closely with the Scrabble universe in an article made to look encyclopedic. I suppose I should put an edit sweep in, but to my cycloptic eye the concept is pretty clear and well-written in parts. Aleister 13:12 6 1 '11
- Keep This is quirky and amusing. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:07, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Red Check Mark. Well written made-up bullshit isn't always bad. It's written pretty well, and although there isn't a lot that is traditionally funny, I appreciate the oddity of it and a few other of the made-up animal articles around here. → I am greatSoup? 18:11 6-Jan-11 ←
- Not too shabby -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:52, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Paranoid Keep. If we delete this, we'll have to delete the stuff I, er, borrowed from ?pedia, too... 'sides, it's decently written and vaguely amusing. Nothing special, but... eh.
1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:17, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Strongest Possible Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:23, 7 January 2011
- Feature! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:27, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. It sometimes seems like half the articles on this site are random made-up bullshit added in 2005. This is one of them. pillow talk 22:57, January 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Several good writers visited in 2010--and failed to find or provide a concept. Spıke Ѧ 23:44 5-Jan-11
- Delete. Stuck in neutral,not going anywhere. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:42, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- You forgot to put on the VFD tag, mon! Lucky no admin noticed it yet! --Scofield 22:47, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Kept --ChiefjusticeXBox360 22:54, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Sure looks like patent nonsense to me. pillow talk 18:38, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. One of a set of interlocking pages seeking to recast Keego Harbor, Michigan as a kingdom. Does not relate to the real city, except by encrypting. Spıke Ѧ 19:19 6-Jan-11
- (mandatory image) (mandatory image) Yeah, just kinda random nonsense, not really about anything (especially the city that it is based on). → I am greatSoup? 20:38 6-Jan-11 ←
- That's an article?
1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:38, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Home page doodles. Not a mainspace article. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:07, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This is not the place to create your own make-believe world, unless it's funny. --Scofield 16:11, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Not that bad.--Sycamore (Talk) 07:03, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. You know what's a great idea for an article? Take some random character from some famous series, and then claim that said character is gay for other individuals in that series. Profit!!! pillow talk 18:36, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- He's gay! And that's about the only joke--extended to a full-length feature. Spıke Ѧ 19:22 6-Jan-11
- Delete. You'd think that, with the subject of most characters' articles being about their sexuality, this entire encyclopedia was edited by nothing other than preteen boys. → I am greatSoup? 20:41 6-Jan-11 ←
- And you would be right. pillow talk 20:41, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Wow... man-love, of course. All man-love.
1234 ~ Major Pleb Sir Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:37, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- fucking die already --Roman Dog Bird 23:17, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Derogatory and offensive. How DARE they pick on this poor house-elf? --Scofield 08:43, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. Hi, there, vanity template! pillow talk 18:45, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Template says nothing, and does nothing other than direct readers to Cid's fantasy universe. Spıke Ѧ 19:31 6-Jan-11
- Huh? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:06, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- El Cid → I am greatSoup? 20:47 6-Jan-11 ←
- Hi, vanity template!
1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:50, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- I dont get it. Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 09:52, January 7, 2011
- Delete. Goodbye, vanity template. --Scofield 16:10, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Hype, you didn't follow the rules but did something with cut-and-paste, and all the elapsed timers on today's nominations were broken. Spıke Ѧ 19:13 6-Jan-11
- I always do that. The rules are really long. There's another way to get the current time into that box? pillow talk 20:13, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Copy and paste the template at the start of Sec. 1, not a copy of another voting box. You did type the time of the nomination--but not the date, without which the 24-hour minimum can't be measured. Spıke Ѧ 20:16 6-Jan-11
- Oopsie doodle. pillow talk 20:19, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Hi, there, vanity category! pillow talk 18:44, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Author's mistake, throughout creating this alternate universe, is to have only one Uncyclopedian in the category. Spıke Ѧ 19:32 6-Jan-11
- El Cid → I am greatSoup? 20:47 6-Jan-11 ←
- Hi, vanity category!
1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:49, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- whatta load --Roman Dog Bird 22:46, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Die, vanity category. --Scofield 16:14, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Executive Poopsmiphery shit - If you find something like this, please empty it and bring it to QVFD instead thanks.--Sycamore (Talk) 09:33, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. Only about a third of this is by User:El cid1010. Apparently, it made so little sense that he decided to incorporate it into his walled garden of utterly random bullshit. pillow talk 18:44, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Becomes the only other Uncyclopedian after Romartus to know enough about the First Council of Nicaea to use it in an article. Unfortunately, he does nothing with it, just cites it as though it were a meme. Spıke Ѧ 19:35 6-Jan-11
- Delete. → I am greatSoup? 20:47 6-Jan-11 ←
- Made-up mehs.
1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:48, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 22:49, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The "dogma" template is funnier than the entire article. --Scofield 09:27, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:07, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. There exists an article First Council of Nicaea. It's conceivable the body of this could be incorporated there as I like the Unorthodox idea here - though it was in fact Arian Christianity that was then the 'bad' Christian theology that got condemned. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:00, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Done. Pasted just the first few paragraphs as a tack-on to the article for now. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:45, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- To be clear, voters: Romartus is working his magic on First Council of Nicaea, not on the article under debate here. Spıke Ѧ 01:53 7-Jan-11
- Well magic might be stretching it but that is correct. This article can disappear now, what was any good is incorporated into the First Council of Nicaea. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:24, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Hyperbole, you seem to be nominating a lot of User:El cid1010's article on VFD. How did you discover this goldmine of a user? --Scofield 09:27, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
- I think I've actually nominated his entire contribution to Uncyclopedia. Sometimes if I find a vanity article, I check to see if there are other associated vanity articles. We ran into an amazing case of this a year or so ago, but I'm not allowed to elaborate or Mordillo will rape me. pillow talk 18:14, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
- A squirrel was involved Scofield. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:36, January 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Another gem from User:El cid1010. Has a single-sentence concept (the Lutheran Church having something to do with Lex Luthor) but quickly degenerates into nonsense. pillow talk 18:42, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Group-huff. Force-fitting Lutheranism with Lex Luthor could be entertaining; but again, entertaining was not what this author had in mind. If someone wants to make that concept work, I'll quickly flip. Spıke Ѧ 19:29 6-Jan-11
- Dobsie/El Cid crap → I am greatSoup? 20:44 6-Jan-11 ←
- Eh. If it was just funny... but it ain't. It so ain't.
1234 ~ Major Pleb Dame Lyrithya • Athyria • Isarra • Haydrahlienne - 'Destroyer of the Wiki' - MUN OUN CUN KUN DUN GUN *shifty eyes* (zombiebaron) • (dr. skullthumper) • (roman dog bird) • (nachlader) • (frosty) • (more zombiebaron) • (talk) • (stalk) • (block) • (log) • (list) • WotM • UotM • RotM • PotM • UGotM x4 • SotM • FFS • NOM • MotM • BFF x2 • GSA x2 • PS • FiyC • MD • Top3 x3 • Top10 • VFH x15 • VFP x3.5 • HoS • TAW • HMC • PEEING • PRS • PC • URC • ΥΣΣ • IC • ZB -- 21:47, 6 January, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 22:51, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. What SPIKE said. --Scofield 08:47, January 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'd also be willing to flip for the same reason as SPIKE. I'd do it myself, because it sounds like a great idea, but I know nothing about the Superman comics. → I am greatSoup? 20:45 6-Jan-11 ←
- And nothing about "the world's greatest criminal mind"??? As usual, there is more than you ever wanted to know, and somehow written in a trainspotter style that identifies avenues of ridicule, at Wikipedia:Lex Luthor. Spıke Ѧ 21:22 6-Jan-11
- Lex Luthor as Martin Luther's bad brother - or perhaps nicer brother as Luther was a bit of a nasty bit of work with a strong streak of overt anti-semititism. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 23:11, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
|