Uncyclopedia:VFH/archive7

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFH.

Wall Street Crash of 1929

Score: +20 Noses dived into the tarmac.

Featured —rc (t) 06:16, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

N+F A lovely little under-write-off. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 11:03, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Very funny. Could use a little tightening, but that's due to the newness of the article. (Four hours between completion and VFH nomination? Is that a landspeed record?)--Procopius 11:52, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Nope. I nommed Hindleyite's Pixellated Face Disease within five seconds of it being completed. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:16, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:21, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
For investing all your votes in this article. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 17:22, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
Very For. This is Top-drawer, it is. Top-drawer. --Anyone 21:06, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
The "before" section alone makes this a for. 15Mickey20 22:04, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
For, even though it fails to mention Gordon Gekko.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:58, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Beautiful. I loved it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:13, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I really learned a lot. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:11, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
For without hesitation. --So So 03:42, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
For. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 06:07, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
For. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 06:44, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
4. --L 16:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --Kwakerjak 20:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
For...it made me laugh and it made me cry----Shandon 04:52, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
For - and I may well vote for this for the Top 10. Savethemooses, I'm very impressed. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:50, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
Definite For. ~ T. (talk) 16:08, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
eXtreme For! --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Fore! Watch out! Oy! Dead ahead! F-O-R-E-! Though I do miss the link to the grassy knoll conspiracy theory. --di Mario 19:29, 5 November 2006 (UTC) (gets hit by a falling body).
For 04:50, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Political advertising

Score: +20 negative campaigns in critical swing state

Featured Now, Savethemooses' Wall Street Crash of 1929 should have been featured, but since tomorrow is election day he agreed to let this article be featured instead (or at least he didn't protest vehemently), with the provision that his article be the next one (and it probably would have been anyway). So if you see Mooses around, give him a tip o' the hat for his courteousness. —rc (t) 05:35, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Nom and for. In case anybody hasn't noticed, I hate political campaigns, and this article has just made my world a better place. --Kwakerjak 04:15, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 04:21, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For - I love blue links. Lots of blue links in this one. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 04:36, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For my own article, For the middle class. Procopius. A brighter dawn ahead. (As an aside, the lead photo was helped tremendously by Reefer Desk. Merci.)--Procopius 04:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For Communism would make the world an even better place though. Frr elections are overrated. 04:41, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For I'd fuck your daughter too. She's hot. --monika 05:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Typically, or perhaps atypicially, brilliant stuff from the copious pro. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 05:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard, 14:38, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
For, though this will be a lot less funny in December, when it gets featured.--<<>> 20:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Good Uncyclopedians, YOUR VOTE MATTERS. If we get 12+ votes before tomorrow, we can get this featured in a timely manner. So come out and vote.--Procopius 20:31, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

For! Hurry, while its still relevant! -- Sir C Holla | CUN 00:00, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For I wanted so much to vote against this because I'm sort of sick of these historical-political articles we've had a glut of lately (which I took a pitiful attempt at writing), but I just couldn't. Too good. Too funny. Good work. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong For One of the greatest articles of all time? In my eyes, quite possibly. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Political advertising now has the endorsement of 13 major Uncyclopedians. Monika says, "I'll fuck your daughter." Sir Brad says "a lot less funny in December." Just 9 to go. I'm Procopius, and I approved this message. (And thank ye all kindly for your support.)--Procopius 01:46, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

For. Just don't let it go to your head, 'cause I'm voting for the other guy come next election.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 01:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For.InfiniteMonkey 04:07, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Wrong about Negroes, wrong about the Union.--Ginchael 04:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
"for" "vote" "taken badly out of context." --So So 06:17, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Another appropriate time to put this on the front page won't come in another two years. --{{User:Stevo the human/sig}} 11:18, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
Comment. The formula? It's simple. The people want lower taxes, better schools and higher ethical standards. They want Political advertising. Political advertising has bipartisan support from people who'll vote for the other guy next time AND Communists. Because they know THIS is Political advertising's time. I'm Procopius and I approved this message, bcause we've got just four votes to go.--Procopius 13:20, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm against this sort of thing. The writing is good, but its the images that make this article. Nominate some of them for VFP instead. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 13:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I really wanted to vote against this simply because it's procopius and I feel like maybe he's getting too big for his britches (read: Procopius is a fatty), but damn it if this wasn't good. --Anyone 21:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
What are we waiting for? Vote er in! Mrthejazz 23:43, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
For Marvelous! If thats how you spell it. --Weatherman1126 03:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Comment. We're almost there, folks, and we couldn't have done it without your support. Now we need you to get your friends and family in the next four-to-six hours. Register them on Uncyclopedia, and get them to vote for Political advertising. Get dead relatives regsitered, and have them vote, too: It will be a touching memorial to their lives. You know what's at stake. Political advertising needs to be featured tomorrow, because it's the article of the future.--Procopius 23:09, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

A vote against Procope is a vote for the terrorists. -- Sir Armando Perentie

KUN FP 00:20, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

Napoleon Bonaparte

Score: +19.5 Russian winters

Featured —rc (t) 09:49, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Nom and Strong For Wow. Clearly, Kwakerjak knows his French history. Vote for him at UN:NUB, too. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:30, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
+1 for using the 69,105 number. --L 05:42, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Could use some more pictures, but well-done.--Procopius 13:36, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
For, because I'm so vain Carly Simon wrote a song about me. --Kwakerjak 15:21, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. Too close to reality- needs a few more dashes of satire and absurdity to lighten it up. InfiniteMonkey 23:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. I like it, but the short jokes get repetitive, even if that was intended. --So So 01:59, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Love it! And I voted for the author. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 04:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
For. It's very VFH worthy. --Anyone 20:04, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Lunatic genius. Swordmaster 21:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
For Literary genus.--<<>> 15:49, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
For. Crudely written in places, but quite good overall.--Winston 04:12, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Pretty good, but overly long on the short jokesand on the facts. And didn't pick up the gauntlet Napoleon dropped when he wrote to Josie telling her not to bathe for a week before he got home. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 09:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Forrrr! - jack mort | cunt | talk - 16:26, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
For-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 17:39, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
For This would go along great with The French Revolution article we just had. Of course, I think the article might need some more pictures. --General Insineratehymn 02:37, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
For --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 19:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
For It has footnotes! --Lenin & McCarthy 20:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
For Yes-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 16:24, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
For --Thetanmancan 20:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
For I laughed from beginning to end. Teh way reality was mixed with teh facts was genius. --KUK nerd 05:09, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment, but I think you'll find that mixing "reality" and "facts" is actually rather easy — those Wikipedia geeks do it all the time. --Kwakerjak 05:21, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

For 07:12, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
For -- 69.164.111.26 03:27, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

Water Polo... With Sharks!

Score: +23 points for the sharks

Featured —rc (t) 07:35, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

N&F, the great pic isnt all this terrific article has going for it. I laughed at this for a long time. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 06:20, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
<tongue-in-cheek> I don't know, Cornbread, this has a couple of sections that vaguely resemble lists...</tongue-in-cheek>. For, anyway, as it's yet another sport at which I suck.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:03, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
for. vgood, not perfect, but well written and funny - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I love this kind of article.--Procopius 14:41, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For Excellent! --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 15:06, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For... Haha! --Llama-Llover 15:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For. A great Uncyclopedic article. -- Hindleyite 17:46, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For Wow... cool. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 18:18, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I suppose the article is good, too. But the pic is what really gets ME rolling.--<<>> 19:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For --EvilZak 19:54, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For Vote... With Sharks! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For. --{{SUBST:nosubst|User:Stevo the human/sig}} 23:34, 31 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Oh, jesus, there's an article too!? You've really outdone yourself here. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:05, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Now I know why Her Majesty knighted Sir Squiggle. 00:35, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
For; nonstop hilarious(!). --DW^III 01:20, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
For. It's Hammerhead time. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
For... with rabid pitbulls! --Shade [...][Praise me/Yell at me][Worthless Additions] 04:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
For--Shandon 16:32, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
For. --Kwakerjak 20:31, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
For. I wanted to nom this myself, but I forgot... User:Wehpudicabok/sig 23:45, 1 November 2006 (UTC)
Strong ForWow, it's just a pure classic.--Lt. Wyoming 19:35, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Without a doubt. --Anyone 21:27, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
For. Figure I'd vote for this before it gets put on the front page. Good work, Squiggle.--Ginchael 00:25, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
Against. What is wrong with you people? It's poorly written and not that funny! Aaadddaaammm 20:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC) No voting on already featured articles, silly.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:39, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Yea, I know, I just wanted to express my opinion. Aaadddaaammm 00:28, 4 November 2006 (UTC)

Jackson Pollock

Score: +19 canvas filled with what appear to be the remains of multi-color blooded small creatures

Featured —rc (t) 06:24, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

N+F. It's all in the name. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 00:01, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Completely uninterested For I would like to state categorically, and for the record, that I had nothing to do with this article. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:08, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
For, although it bothers me that all the pics say "Vincent Van Gogh" on them...-- Sir C Holla | CUN 00:31, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
For But I think it still needs some work. Needs to flow a little better, some of the jokes seem kinda random. InfiniteMonkey 04:03, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
For. An instant laugh. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:27, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
4. --L 06:58, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Definitely funny in spots, but the random wackiness gets tiresome as you go on. --So So 07:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
- comment would it make sense to cut all of section 3, or cut it down to a single paragraph? InfiniteMonkey 17:09, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
  - Comment. Yeah, it was section 3 that made me go from indifferent to against. --So So 02:49, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
    - What was I thinking. I don't know who JP is but this is frigging good. For. --So So 18:09, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
For. --Donut Buy One!|F@H|MUN|NS|Please Help Me|. 12:52, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
I can't believe you are actually buying this piece of garbage... I mean, sort of for. The Jack Pollock I perceive is someone that makes sculptures out of dead rats, causes people to become violently ill and claims it's all part of the experience, and yes, I think this article is a bit too long and dull. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:56, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 15:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
For. 11:47, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I'll be honest...it was the "rabid, frothing vibrator" part that sold me. --Anyone 14:17, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
For Beautifully moving! Appears to describe the mating habits of Jackson Pollock... --Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 20:19, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For Oldsmobile...-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For, just to see what User:Mhaille does this time. c • > • cun w a p q u c ? 06:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
For Not great, but it made me laugh more than once, so it's good enough for me. --Thetanmancan 00:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
For, could do with trimming. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:36, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Several Species Of Small Furry Animals Gathered Together In A Cave and Grooving With A Picture of Some Squiggles. FOR. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 21:29, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
What, I never voted for this already? -- Hindleyite 16:41, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Against It not funny. Pictures all same! Momochii Zabuza

Comment: As is the point of the article. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:47, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Church of God the Wholly Incompetent

Score: +21 Little Prayers Said For HIM

Featured —rc (t) 05:20, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

Nom and For. Clearly divinely inspired - David Gerard 09:14, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
For - It's got "going in with a bullet" written all over it. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 09:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
David, you find the weirdest shit. Procopius, you write the weirdest shit. Modus, you vote for the weirdest shit...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 09:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I liked "Compies are encouraged to read, critique, and grade their Bibles." Unsigned . ~ T. (talk) 11:51, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
For --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 12:52, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. Transcends over so many other dull articles about religion, but touches like this really sold me. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
For The author needs all the encouragement He can get. --Pietro 17:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
For This article not being featured will be accepted as proof of an incompetent god. --EvilZak 19:16, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Procopius must use some machine to churn out good articles this quickly. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 19:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment ~ Yeah, he rips them off of me 98% of the time. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 20:26, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment ~ Dammit, emc, I told you I mailed the check.--Procopius 00:52, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

For Great article, actually competent. Jdude 00:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
For. All class. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 14:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
For. This is made of win and lol. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 15:04, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
For. The article is so well done I believe if it was put on Wikipedia (God forbid) they would be fooled into believing it as truth. And also, omniuselessness might be the greatest word ever. Maybe. --Anyone 18:06, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Almost as good as chocolate Nutri Grain bars. -- Hindleyite 18:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Fore! Only an idiot God would have allowed this article to be written. Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 19:58, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Pretend I say something witty here (if only I had been created without obvious failings...).--<<>> 01:04, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Voting For my own work (and possible damnation).--Procopius 12:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
For Procopious is trying to be the most proliferic Uncyclopedian.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 16:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
For Hi-fuckin'-larious. This'd definitely make a great featured article. Lovin' it! Sir Master Pain (also known as Betty) 22:53, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
Against Like Spider man, only the pictures are funny. -KUK nerd 05:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
For --Thetanmancan 02:36, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
For --waynejkruse 10:46, 28 October 2006 (GMT)
For. One of the best religion-related articles I've read. --Shade [...][Praise me/Yell at me][Worthless Additions] 03:53, 30 October 2006 (UTC)

The Putz Who Stole Hanukkah

Score: +19.5 growing beards

Featured —rc (t) 06:23, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Self-Nom and For. This was incredibly hard to write, and its finally ready. Hands down the best article I've written. Thanks to Modusoperandi and Squiggle for the pics. Now VOTE! Reskin for the holidays...? -- Sir C Holla | CUN 04:25, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
For; yeah, I was part of it. So what? It's good, really good. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
For...though I forsee MoneySign swooping in and saying it's too in-jokey--Shandon 08:13, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
At least you haven't let it turn you bitter.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
FOR! Says it all, really. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:54, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
Beautiful! <puts down mirror> Oh! The page is good, too. For.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 17:26, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
For, I saw this one baking, and it looked quite yummy a while ago.--<<>> 18:38, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

*For. --Anyone 20:11, 17 October 2006 (UTC) Since I hadn't read The Grinch Who Stole Christmas in a while I didn't realize how unremarkably similar these two are, but upon re-reading both I see that only the words differ from story to story, where as the rest feels the same plus jews. Abstain. --Anyone 17:49, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

For, This stuff is the shizzle.--The One and Only Czar Yah 21:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Yes. This might be the best article I've ever read.--Kevin Bell 02:49, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
For wonderful pic. the rest of it is awesome.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 20:16, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
For. Cornbread can drop the rhymes.--Procopius 04:01, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
For - Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:24, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
For 11:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
For Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 14:46, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
For Simply amazing! Great job!--• T to the Roooy • Proud to be Say 'Hi!' 17:33, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
For. A very entertaining read. 15Mickey20 20:36, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
For - I love you Nightmare975 22:40, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
For Jewish Content. --Sir Z o m b i e b a ro n 02:58, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Strong For - Probably the most clever damn thing I've seen on Uncyclopedia. --Rabid Jaguar 03:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. I wish I understood the fuss. This article is essentially verbatim Seuss with a variety of Jewish words substituted. Not nearly original enough for me to vote for, though I quite enjoyed the main picture.--Winston 04:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

(Discussion Continued...)

For. --Shade [...][Praise me/Yell at me][Worthless Additions] 04:28, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. For pretty much the same reasons as Winston. It's not that hard to tweak an existing work to a new theme. Also, I didn't find it funny. But as a point of order, I don't think it's an encyclopedia article. I think it's an UnBook. I move to have it withdrawn from VFH and self-nommed for UnBook of the Month. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 08:49, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. It's a non-concept wrapped up in cheap paper. It doesn't make the central issue funny - it merely renders it trivial. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 09:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Enviably well written, really impressive, but, alas, no laughs... --Sir Jam 09:47, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Didn't find it particularly original or funny (especially the ending). --So So 14:34, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
For, super-good. but agreed it's more an unbook than article - jack mort | cunt | talk - 16:37, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
Against-funny, but not original -- The Llama Llover
For As Alliteration attests, amusement's ability abides apathetically apropos absurd antics' absence. --EvilZak 05:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 11:30, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. I'd say great if it wasn't such a terrible piece of useless trash.--Vosnul 17:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
For hahahaha --JimmyB 21:59, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I lol'd. --User:Nintendorulez 16:27, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Sorry, but we just had a Dr. Suess themed book featured. Give everybody some time to recover. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 19:33, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Comment -And why should that make a difference, EMC? We're trying to feature the funniest articles, it shouldnt matter how it is written... -- Sir C Holla | CUN 19:37, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

For. (settled in the IRC channel; "dispute" resolved) --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 20:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

For-Very witty article, it fits in with the actual lines of the book very well.--Ganall 20:29, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Against* Same reasons as So So and everyone else. Enigma16 ~~-Unsigned, doesnt count. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 00:20, 23 October 2006 (UTC)~~ - ~~Sir Cornbread, doesn't count. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 00:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)~~ ~~EMC's sig has a dancing guy, therefore it doesnt count. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 00:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)~~
~~I change my vote to Against because Cornbread is a pompous jerk who thinks hes sweet because he can copy a published book. Also, I'm Jewish.--Kevin Bell 03:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)~~

(Discussion Continued)

Against Man this is a total load of shit. Not only is Sir Cornbread, an uptight, christian, racist prick, he also writes completely craparticles. Even a 10 year old could do a better parody. Also the fact that he refuses to take criticism and when he comes across someone who beats him in an arguement he says they don't count because it has a dancing guy means that he probably is a 10 year old. With ADD. Or worse.--Anonymous 09:38, 23 October 2006 (UCT) -Unisgned doenst count. And for the record I'm half-Jewish you retard. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
I have the right to be anonymous, i was just making a point.Anonymous 04:37 24th of october 2006

Ahem... Read the instructuions - you are supposed to sign your vote with 4 "~'s, whether you are anonymous or not. -- The Colonel (talk) 06:52, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment. "THIS IS A VOTE, NOT A DISCUSSION." You two.--<<

>> 14:36, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

For-Bien--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 06:21, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
For. This is a very funny article. --209.189.245.112 04:00, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
For Good, though it stuck too closely with the real book and should have been a bit more original. --Thetanmancan 02:14, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Washington and Lafayette

Score: +19 comedy acts written

Featured —rc (t) 06:36, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Self-nom and for. Coming to a theater near you.--Procopius 12:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
For. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 12:44, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. I like it, but I don't know why. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:27, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
For YES.--Ginchael 00:50, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I have no idea what the joke is, but it is beautifully laid out which gives me the Pot Noodle horn. I could look at it all day. 20:15, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
For, Procopius makes history come alive.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:35, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
For maintaining the morale of the young republic, I vote yes.--Rljenk 01:01, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:45, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
For ...better than most...though the pic of 'em both togethah could use an upgrade--Shandon 04:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I enjoyed the echoes of all the different classic comedy teams. --User:SolarEquinox/sig 20:49, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
For. It's like a fine tooled Queen Ann. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:22, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Classy. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 22:36, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For Very creative. --Thetanmancan 03:29, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
For. 23:51, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Fuck. I forgot to vote for this. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:28, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Against Close but not quite. It's very well written, flows well, follows a narrative arc and uses images well. However, it needs two or three places that just make me laugh, or at least chuckle. InfiniteMonkey 04:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Against -- The Llama Llover
For. Gets saved from stagnation removal by making me laugh (and being clever in the process).--<<>> 18:24, 17 October 2006 (PDT)
For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:06, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
For - Am I late?! --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 05:47, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
For. --Kwakerjak 14:51, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 16:27, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Hays Code

Score: +18 lewd portrayals of breasts

Featured —rc (t) 05:50, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Nom and For - David Gerard 15:46, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
Strong For One of the best article's I've read in a very, very long time. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 16:11, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
For I loved it, it made me chuckle. --Nightmare975 21:50, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
fdasfdsdfsa1dfsadfsforfdsafdsafdsa! --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 02:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. Creative writing, jokes that jump out of nowhere, just great all around. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 03:12, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Frankly, my dear, I don't give an against. Therefore, I give a Strong For. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:22, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
for, <this comment censored by the MPAA>.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:46, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Really fine writing. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 05:25, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
4. --L 06:16, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
For. ^_^ 12:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Yes and Very much Yes. Because maybe if it's on the front page, a hollywood producer will read it and start making Ass-kicking Hippie 2: Pacifist Fury. --Anyone 14:40, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
"Son, sit down. Once I voted for one of my own articles. I'm not proud of it, but I'd rather you hear it from me than on the playground."--Procopius 02:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:43, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
FOR YES. --monika 19:09, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
For --Kwakerjak 15:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
For Very smart. --Thetanmancan 01:05, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
For. sick. you are blatantly in the middle of A-level film studies. itallian neo-realism and shocking cinema. watch doom generation by gregg araki, you can get a whole essay out of that. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
For Brilliant. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 00:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Be pretentious

Score: +19 witty comments

Featured —rc (t) 05:57, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Quite Right. This proverbial article has improved vastly, and as such deserves to be nominated. --Anyone 19:18, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Affirmative, good sir.--<<>> 19:52, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For, tho' truly I care not a whiff of its vastly improved nature, the page tis funny, what?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Strong For If, after reading this article, anyone still thinks that my ragamuffin, run-of-the-mill, and hopelessly crude piece of tripe HowTo:Skip School is better than this literate, elegant work of prose, than thank you. But this is good too. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For Ha! What a positively grand article!--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 04:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
The authorial status I enjoy with regard to this article leads me to vote For --Jamtrousers 09:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
5 --L 10:32, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For Marry, I am voting for this vastly excellent article, Horatio--T-Roooy 10:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For.--Procopius 11:57, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:52, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For. --User:Nintendorulez 22:08, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For. 01:08, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
For. -- --The Blaque 11:15, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
El Forro. c • > • cun w a p q u c ? 06:42, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
For --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 13:23, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Funny and informative. 15Mickey20 18:51, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:50, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
NO MORE HOWTOs! -- Sir C Holla | CUN 08:04, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
...unless they're this good. For. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 14:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
For --The Llama Llover

Martin Van Buren

Score: +20.5 presidents not on any greenbacks

Featured —rc (t) 04:38, 20 October 2006 (UTC)

Nomination and For. Funny, article, plenty of people working on it, and the pictures add to the effect quite nicely. I don't know. You either hate this page, or you think it's a riot. --The Llama Llover
Against. It's not good enough for a front-page article. Like, this one time, we were out at this roller rink. He went up to this girl and was like, "Hey, do you wanna go get a burger or something?" And she said yes, but then she totally blew him off. Later, I asked her why she did it and she said it was because he looked like shit. It's true. That's what Martin Van Buren looks like. That is frikkin' colloquial. --thematrixeætsyou, the ass kicker (talk) (flames) 05:49, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
For - wasn't this nominated before? This is really good - David Gerard 09:51, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
~~Yeah, and I liked it better when it didn't have the parts on Star Trek, squirrels and phone calls, but still for. --So So 09:58, 29 September 2006 (UTC)~~
Against. I nominated this before; it was on VFH for over a month but never got any traction. Let it remain Quasi-Featured.--Procopius 11:44, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
For. It's good, not great, but that screen watching part is fuckin awesome. Fuckin screen watchers. --Anyone 12:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. I chuckled. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Against Brad removed this a while ago, because of stagnation. It's a Quasi... -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 22:28, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment I need the diff for an unsigned vote to count. —rc (t) 22:24, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

For - I don't recall if I voted for or against this article the first time around. Actually, I don't even recall if I voted on it the first time around. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 20:33, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
For I love it.--Bladetip 21:19, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment- This article has been changed a lot since the last nomination. Please take a chance to look at it before you automatically vote against it. --The Llama Llover
For... yeah, it's ok, maybe a little work is needed, but it's still good --User:Lolster884
For the second time. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 07:05, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I tweaked it a bit, but only a little. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 08:18, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. Quasi, Quasi, Quasi!!! 14:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Hmmmmmmm.... no. 15:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I love it. --Hhamdy283 20:07, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
I was going to vote against, but the tweaks have put it over the edge into for territory. 15Mickey20 20:25, 30 September
For And as for the guy above me, if tweaks would change your mind one way or the other, you shouldn't vote at all. Savant13 21:15, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

2006 (UTC)

Comment. Before the changes, it was a good idea, but had little to do with Martin Van Buren. The added references to his political career nullified my objections (as well as making it funnier) and made it forworthy. 15Mickey20 12:12, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

Strong For I liked it before, but the changes made it hilarious. --Onion 00:17, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
For, but dude, Llama Llover? You made so many edits! You should just rough-draft everything into a document and then post it instead of changing it every single time you see some little thing wrong... --Just Joshin' Ya!
For Good work. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:41, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Abstain. Changed my mind because of changes in article. The changes would have been good if it were any other page, but to me the charm to this particular article was in how it gave next to no reference to the actual person's life. --So So 01:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- For and Comment. Actually, I have kind of come up with something crazy with The Llama Llover and I don't know if you like it or not. Well, we are all silly people, right? :) But, yeah, I think the changes are a bit over the top and have kind of adulterated the original flavour of the humor. Shame on Hardwick FundleBuggy. -- The Colonel (talk) 05:48, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Strong For lol, i couldnt stop laughing. star trek? puh-lease --Running with scissors
For. Much better with refences to the actual person.--<<>> 15:45, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For As if the original article wasn't enough, a hate template created on the side is like another cake made of icing. Love:M.D
OH MY GOD HARDWICK MADE IT FUNNY! User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:25, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Against It failed already, yes? --Jordanus 17:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For good show --User:Stoopid - no timestamp
for this was almost featured last time, but i didnt vote for it. so now i am. --Hooplah!!!
Against. HTBSANJF in its finest. - User:Guest/sig 05:42, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Still one of my favorites, anyway. c • > • cun w a p q u c ? 07:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 18:52, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For Very, very funny. A hatred on a personal level with intermitent historical references. Good job. --Thetanmancan 22:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
For I suppose... -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:52, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
For I thought I've voted on this one, well I read it a while ago, deja vu all over again.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 05:53, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
For 69.164.111.26 17:25, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
For - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 15:08, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

French Revolution

Score: +21 to face Le Guillotine

Featured —rc (t) 05:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Self Nom + For Maybe because Pee Review failed me, or because of the euphoric, drunken feeling of power that comes with having written a featured article, but I wanna see how this article does. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:55, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
It was a vote for, it was a vote against. Oh wait, it was a vote For. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 04:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Against. Content isnt that funny...-- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I giggled. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Aww, someone already made a Tale of Two Cities joke...--Ginchael 14:08, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Good show. 14:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I loved it. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a waterfall. 15:59, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 01:31, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
What's French for For? 07:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Pour. Contre is Against, but you really wouldn't want to use that, now would you? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 14:03, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

For Erastus Brigham Bigelow. --So So 10:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 10:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Yay. ~~I just don't feel like it had It, know what I'm saying? Of course you don't, I'm being too vague.~~ upon a re-read, I like it more, and since I never disliked it, that's all it needed. --Anyone 20:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For-Well done.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 15:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For, if only because I managed to defy all odds and actually contribute something mildly amusing to Uncyclopedia (even if it's just a footnote), and I'm so desperate for attention it's pathetic. --Kwakerjak 19:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Brilliant! ---Rev. Isra (talk) 21:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
FOR (thank you very much) if you liked THAT, you should check out mcdonalds. That place is so very legal...I hope.-EnvyOfBobBarker october 5 2006
For It made me laugh. Viva la France! Haha unsigned by 151.201.251.194
Against The opening was very clever, but honestly this article has the tone and content of an actual encyclopedia more than a witty or silly Uncyclopedia article. --Thetanmancan 04:36, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For I have plenty of cake, thanks. --Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 03:32, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I actually like it, I'm just a prick. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 04:12, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Für Aber ich hasse die franzoezische Kultur!-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 23:19, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
Oui---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 13:58, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Pour. First 500 revolutionaries get a free Phyrgian cap! The next 500 get executed.--Procopius 00:59, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
Pamplemousse!!! C'est excellente! Donne-moi le poisson de la revolution! (For) --Hhamdy283 05:22, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
For --169.199.168.148 17:17, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Learn Hebrew

Score: Torahs misread +22

Featured —rc (t) 05:48, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Nom and For. A great one from Mordillo. Possibly the most abusive and erudite HowTo. And it's got this line: The proper way to pronounce this letter is take a nut and shove it down your throat as far down as possible and then observe the sounds you make as you try to cough it out. Got it? There is your Chet.--Procopius 23:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For. It's not Mordillo's best work, but that doesn't mean it's not hilarious. P.S., Mordillo, can I have a picture of you for the Self-hating Jew article? --User:Falcotron/sig 00:21, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

([[Talk:HowTo:Learn Hebrew#From VFH|discussion continued...]])

For --Mister Nosey 00:59, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Against Didn't like it then, don't like it now. Sorry. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:23, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I chortled. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:26, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Nice. Nearly as much fun as deliberately mixing up your salaams and shaloms in Jerusalem. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 04:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For, as per nommer. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 09:38, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 12:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For Well, it got a warm mention in the PLS AND I wrote it, need to vote for it nes't pas? :) -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 16:41, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For. One of my favourite articles from Poo Lit. -- Hindleyite 18:27, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
בעד. Means for. But don't even ask how to pronounce it.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 00:43, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Hitlerbear says For - David Gerard 21:48, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
For- Wow, Hebrew sounds really dangerous. Seriously, I thought I was going to choke on that chet thing. --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 14:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
For. And I should say that there ARE vowels in Hebrew. We put them under our letters. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 00:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Only if it's a book for children or poetry, or for beginners. Trust me we don't write the vowels 99% of the time.---Asteroid B612

(aka Rataube) - Ñ 14:26, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

Against. Sorry, only made me laugh once. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:24, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Against Cornbread is one laugh ahead of me. "A" for effort, though.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 23:12, 5 September 2006 (UTC) For, it's grown on me.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:58, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Against Not featureworthy, because. --ZniLe 12:34, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

commentWhich was always a good reason...-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo

GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 18:26, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

For. Language humor is the best.--<<>> 19:13, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Damn and i actually tried learning Hebrew... too funny.--Lutskovp 20:01, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. I already know Hebrew, which made this article even more funny! Bravo to the creator!! (besides, I even helped out with some modifications) --User:Llama-Llover
For. I don't know a lick of Hebrew, but after reading this I'll act like I do. Nice addition of sound files, too. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 06:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. I love this article. It pokes fun at the native English speakers (namely, me) and the picture at the end with Windows in Hebrew was hilarious. --User:Armodeus
Against While I like this article and appreciate the effort and humour involved, it's just a bit too angsty for my tastes and certainly not feature-quality, sadly. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 03:50, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
For --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:12, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
For An orgasmically conundroumousifacilicious escapade. Bravo. -- 21:36, 26 September 2006 (UTC) Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH
For Quite, quite funny. --Thetanmancan 06:14, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Against Kinda messy and not that funny. --Jordanus 14:34, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Against its just not funny --Hooplah!!!!
For -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 17:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
For- I thought dabbling in ancient hebrew would be worth a chuckle, how terribly wrong I was. --—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Weasel3689 (talk • contribs)

Comment diff —rc (t) 06:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

For. --Kwakerjak 12:47, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
For. 23:50, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
For. --Jamtrousers 17:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
For I hadn't already voted? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:01, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

UnBooks:Horton Hires a Ho

Score: +29 tricks turned

Featured —rc (t) 02:36, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Just Nom for now Okay, I don't know what demented mind wrote this (I don't check authors before I vote or nominate articles), but it's a stark discourse on human sexuality that deserves to be burned in a fire. I mean read. —rc (t) 00:50, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Strong For I was thinking of nomming this myself. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Obligatory For. - You'd have to know the guy it's based on. His theory was that marriage is just prostitution with more expensive gifts and less exciting sex. With a guy like that, the story writes itself. ~ T. (talk) 01:16, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For. This is a disgrace to the internet that has infuriated the puritan within me with its tasteless irreverance. That being said, it's a funny funny.--<<>> 01:48, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For but it's a shame (for me) this got here just after my self-nom. Ah well. --Ж Kalir, Awesome Author_{(alliteration affords additional awesome)} 02:08, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Ho, the places you'll go!--Procopius 02:15, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
This is sick, and has "lawsuit" written all over it. Hm, come to think of it, a lawsuit is just what we need to raise our profile. Strong for. InfiniteMonkey 04:33, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Strong For, and there will be more Dr. Seuss coming soon. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:47, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
4^{4^4⁴}! Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 07:44, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
3. --L 10:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Oh yeaaah. Daddy likee. And who hasn't gotten stiffed by a prostitute? --Anyone 14:04, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 16:21, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For - -Stevo the Human, now with an article!!
For. But the question is, can he do it in a train? Can he do it in the rain? Can he do it in the park? Can he do it just for a lark? Help me, I'm just bullshitting in Seussian verse... — Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) (01:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC))
For. I'd be a ho if I passed up the chance to vote for this before it got on the main page. John1728 09:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For ^_^ 12:01, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 13:14, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Strong for. Hilarious!--T-Roooy 15:59, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Ho yeah. Such whornederful prose. -- Hindleyite 16:02, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Something rhyming with for. --User:Nintendorulez 21:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
For- priceless. --The Llama Llover
Sure said the...fur? --Ginchael 23:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Hell yes. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 23:54, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
For just to be redundant. Also, I saw this linked, I think it was in the recent articles template, and just from the title I could tell it was nommed. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 02:06, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
For Har har.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:18, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Ho ho ho. Great to see poetry on the front page....FOR. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 07:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
For---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 13:54, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
For One of the absolute best articles I have ever seen on Uncyclopedia. Bravo. --Thetanmancan 00:51, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Commemorative plate

Score: +21 tasteful, elegant additions to any home

Featured —rc (t) 06:16, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Self-nom and for - I feel this one deserves a whirl.--Nydas 20:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For Great stuff. One suggestion though: change "madam" to "ma'am". It reads smoother and makes the speaker sound like even more of a fast-talking slickster. --Jordanus 21:10, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For And I like "Madam". It seems more bullshit-respectful than "Ma'am". --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:04, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For! Put me down for a set of 20! Any type will do, I JUST WANT THE DAMN PLATES --So So 03:01, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I was pleasantly surprised. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 04:51, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For 05:42, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For, and I'd like my Thunderbirds plate back now, please.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:48, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For. c • > • cun w a p q u c ? 07:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I loved "Why have you got so many plates, granny? You never seem to eat anything." John1728 09:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
4. --L 10:11, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For - perfect - David Gerard 12:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I went into it decidedly against (cmon, how can this be good?!) and came out decidedly for (why didn't someone think of this sooner?!) --Anyone 12:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For--Shandon 15:29, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Is funny.--<<>> 21:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
You know, for some reason this is what I thought a commemorative plate actually was at first. For. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:49, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For But you mean this isn't what a commemorative plate is? Wonderful article by the way. --T-Roooy 11:10, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
For This receives the 'Savant13 award for comedic excellency thanks to Savant13's edits'. --Savant13 17:40, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. It's great that he author manages to make clear of his/her point in the first few lines, but, yeah, those questions marks kind of put me off a bit. -- The Colonel (talk) 15:23, 8 October 2006 (UTC)
For. The opposition section sold it to me.--Procopius 15:55, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
For Not everybody is able to dream the dream of commemorative plates. Reading this reminds me of guys with red and white striped suits, straw hats, and obnoxiously toothy grins. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:30, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 18:31, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Rorschach Inkblot Acid Test

Score: +22 Disorders Diagnosed

Featured —rc (t) 06:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Self-nomination. OK, as far as Swiss psychiatrists go, everyone knows Jung. But Hermann Rorschach deserves a bit of recognition. Plus, I did a great deal of field research on this one. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 12:53, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
+1 For hilariousness--Savant13 14:40, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
For --Shandon 18:10, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
For. I looked at this while it was in progress, and almost felt obliged to nominate it myself. Great work Immy! -- Sir C Holla | CUN 21:02, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
For I see a beautiful lady in that inkblot. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 22:05, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Great mix of dumb puns, brilliant satire, and silly drug references; what more could you want? Oh, pictures. They rock too. --Falcotron 06:22, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
For all my childhood issues rushing back into my head.--Procopius 11:42, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. Once again, Immy comes through with the cerebral hahas. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:38, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
for, it's a trip. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:41, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Absolute-Lookatthebirdie!! --Donut Buy One!|F@H|MUN|NS|Please Help Me|. 20:39, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
A butterfly on a flower. Why are we bothering to vote? Just feature it instantly. 13:16, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Love it. Very, very clever. I'll have what you're having. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 07:09, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Good heavens, feature this immediately. It's hilarious. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 01:53, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Nice! c • > • cun w a p q u c ? 02:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
For. What an excellent community evaluation this has been. Psychologically adorable. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:31, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I save this from stagnation! User:Wehpudicabok/sig 19:43, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Jeez, how come I never voted for this before now? -- Hindleyite 20:09, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
For I thought I had already voted for this. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 15:57, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Against Not to be a nay-sayer, but I just don't find this very funny. It seems more random than it does funny. I do like the pictures, though. --Thetanmancan 06:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Against I agree--Jordanus 17:25, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I just finished reading Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test.. great book, almost as good as this. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:42, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For. This is pretty awesome. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 22:01, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For! Egad, so many obscure blue links! --L 10:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For. --Kwakerjak 12:49, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
For out, man because, like dude, it changed colors and then went all kind of blurry. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 12:55, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
For. 23:48, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Hammer

Score: +23 hammer faced smashes

Featured —rc (t) 06:15, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

Nomination and for. One of my favorites. --So So 09:17, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. This is delightful. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 15:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. You don't want to mess with me. I've got a hammer. --Jordanus 16:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Laughed out loud at it while I was meant to be working earlier this week. Not sure about the biology bit though.15Mickey20 19:50, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. C'mon! It's a hammer.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:27, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I like how it refuses to consider any constructive use for the tool.--Procopius 12:54, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
"The hammer's scientific name is Hammerius hitticus, which is obviously a bland and misguided attempt to write something hammer-related in a vaguely Latinate manner." How could you not vote for? User:Wehpudicabok/sig 19:37, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
No. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 22:26, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Very funny. I loled. --Kinst 02:30, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:58, 26 September 2006 (UTC)

~~Unsigned...? -- Sir C Holla | CUN 03:09, 1 October 2006 (UTC~~)

I checked the history, and apparently David Gerard made a change that screwed up this person's sig and timestamp everywhere it occurred on this page. Since it was signed originally, I went ahead and fixed this person's sig for all the votes they made here. --Jordanus 04:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

ForThough I prefer the mallet.--Wit (tawk) 01:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For a sack of hammers - David Gerard 10:59, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
SMASHY! ...er, wait, wrong voting page. I meant obligitory for. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 14:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

*""For"" Its Hammertime Bitches Unsigned don't feel like looking for who did it.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

~~How about this?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:03, 30 September 2006 (UTC)~~ Weasel3689 signed below. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
for really random and funny. --JimmyB 06:02, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
For It's as dumb as a bag of hammers. "Hammer of the Gods!We are your overlooooorrrds!"-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 11:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Quite funny. --SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 18:55, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
For Excellent use of pictures and the word 'ululate'. Savant13 21:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
For "Swing hammer manically Don'task questions" Thi§ arti¢le pwns --Weasel3689 06:46, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Measure once. Whack twice. What kind of troll am I, after all? For Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 05:37, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Anyone who thinks otherwise gets their eyes gouged out. -Stevo the Human
For - excellent Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For, hehehe.--<<>> 23:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 13:00, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
For Includes both clever humor and violence! Something for everyone. --Thetanmancan 22:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Brilliant. 23:54, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal

Score: +22 pensive thoughts whilst doing 10 minutes in the slammer

Featured —rc (t) 08:14, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Nom and for. I've never added anything here before, but this is deserving. And not just because it mentions me (needs moving into the main namespace though of course) -- sannse<staff/> (talk) 19:12, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Conditional for: move it into the main namespace. — Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) (19:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC))
- Condition met; For. — Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) (19:20, 2 October 2006 (UTC))
For. Brilliance. -- Hindleyite 19:17, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I feel kind of bad now. When I get banned, all I say is, "F*uck!".--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For I felt Hardwick's pain. I haven't actually, as I haven't been banned. But I pretended like I felt his pain. It hurt. I think. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:31, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For but this one crosses the line of "In jokes", "Vanity", and "Sigining Articles". However it's damn funny! --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:22, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For. That is hilarious. I love it. --Flyingfeline 21:54, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
For, but how did he keep this log while banned? {It was then that I started to search for possible holes in the inpenetrable banwall...}-<<>> 22:38, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Strong For My favorite Fundlebuggy article yet! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:00, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For I can empathize. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 01:28, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
~~For a crime he almost certainly did commit.~~ Abstain. I maintain my point of view that inside jokes are not for the front page, but, yeah, this is definitely on of the best written ever. "Go on a blanking spree..." they whisper to me. "You'll feel better. It's revenge. They hate blanking sprees.... -- The Colonel (talk) 04:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For because this could lead to his breakout new prison album.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 04:32, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For I've done my time. I've paid my debt to society. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 04:42, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Well, it's two parts brilliant with three parts Hardwick, what more do you want? Except possibly twelve parts pie. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a waterfall. 06:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Self-reference, inside joke, signed article, subtle encouragement to the stupid ... and LOL funny. What's not to like? - David Gerard 10:20, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For great justice. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For. --SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - 16:12, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Against A bit too short, and way too inside joke-y for the front page --Jordanus 17:29, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Against Injokey, but more importantly it's vanity. It'd set a bad precedent to feature this. (Yeah yeah, I know we already featured HowTo:Maintain a vanity site on Wikipedia or whatever.) —rc (t) 20:53, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Vanity? Like... Euroi - *is shot* --User:Nintendorulez 20:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Comment What do we do with this b/c its InJoke-ness is way over the heads of people. It's like choosing which of your children is slated for ritual execution.-- Sir Severian

(Sprich mit mir!)

05:15, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

For. Many of us can relate. The article should mention what he was banned for though. --User:Nintendorulez 20:55, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
For And turn it into an UnBook if you can. 05:54, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Against - Sorry Hardwick, I do like the article, but don't think its suitable for the front page for reasons previously stated. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 07:56, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
For. It is vanity, but you don't have to know anything about Uncyclopedia to find it funny. Except, of course, that it's a parody site. I suppose if someone wandered onto Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal, mistaking it for Wikipedia, they might find it very unprofessional, but whatever. John1728 10:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
For. I spent 24 hours banned once, man. I know how it hurts. But now I'm reformed, brutha! Swordmaster 21:31, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
For For those people arguing that it shouldn't be featured because it's an inside joke, I think that even if it's someone's first time here, they'll pick it up fairly quickly, furthermore the entire premise is simply like nothing thats ever been thought of before. Hardwick's best work, I'd say. -- Kaizer the Bjorn takkun (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 21:45, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:47, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For Such a good way to spend one's time when banned from Uncyclopedia. I'll appreciate the irony when this gets featured. --Thetanmancan 05:45, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Wow. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:02, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
For. Normally I'd vote against this sort of thing, but it's pretty funny, and quite instructional in a way. It has a certain, I dunno, charm. c • > • cun w a p q u c ? 07:21, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Fire hydrant

Score: +18 bloody red hosepipe nozzles

Featured —rc (t) 06:05, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

A-Nom-ynous and For. Somewhat short but hilarious biography of a...fire hydrant :(? Zanno 06:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC) ~~-Unsigned, Nom doesnt count, should be removed. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:04, 27 September 2006 (UTC)~~
There, I registered. Happy? Zanno 06:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. 07:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. It was nice, but boring and unexceptional. John1728 10:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For - I laughed out loud. Last line is a winnah - David Gerard 11:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Winner. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 13:20, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. --SolarEquinox Under development - please wear protective goggles Verbally abuse me! - ~~~~~ 15:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. Only mildly amusing and kind of short, like my penis. --Anyone 16:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

(discussion continued...)

For - Since, like a hydrant, my penis gushes when properly manipulated Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 19:39, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For - I like this, it's so completely different from anything I'd do. --Nydas 19:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I'd say it borders on a tremendous shaggy dog story, but fire hydrant's aversion to dogs, shaggy or not, and their profoundly misguided sprinklings will not allow me. Excellent subtlety, not boredom, abounds. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:50, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Against Why? It's retarded. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:48, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
This is not retarded. All you have to do is read it the whole way through (the WHOLE WAY THROUGH, mind you), and then after you've read the last line, read it all again. Then suddenly it's the funniest thing you've ever read. I think. For. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
I change my mind. Definitely Not retarded, and actually pretty amusing. Strong For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:25, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak for --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 00:32, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong For I didn't want to like it, but I did. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Suprised me, because it was actually good. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 03:47, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I didn't expect this one to be good. Nicely done. --Shade [...][Praise me/Yell at me][Worthless Additions] 03:57, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Not the funniest article in the world, but I reward cleverness. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:53, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For I thought it was retarded until I did what, ahem, 'Weppy, the Wehpudicabok' said, at which point it became funny, and certainly VFH-worthy. The Freed Mind Sutoth the Black Mage [FACEHOLE HERE] [MUN] [YvJP]I am not a waterfall. 11:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For --Kwakerjak 20:18, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For I read parts of it, then I read it completly and it was funny...it just hit me.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 13:15, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
For, cause i think having "fire hydrant" be a person is real clever --User:Lolster884
For. I like it. 14:28, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
FOR If I could, I would give it more than a +1 Savant13 21:24, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
For The realistic pics are swell.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 22:58, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
For- excellent job --The Llama Llover
For Clever! —rc (t) 20:56, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

A Tour of Baghdad

Score: +17.5 bombed out buildings

Featured —rc (t) 06:09, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Shameless self-nomination and for Because I'm vainglorious and I have no soul.--Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 18:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
For. No comment (as commenting to those w/o souls is bad mojo).--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:40, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Random humourous comment and FOR. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 20:01, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong for. Well done. InfiniteMonkey 20:32, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. Ehhhhhhhhh. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 22:03, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
For gooooooood. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
For the flag is still there.... burning.--<<>> 01:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
For The "locals gather" picture made me giggle. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:01, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 08:25, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 11:57, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
For As much as I hated Iraq, this is funny.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. Good writing, excellent pictures -- and I'm glad to see the AT-AT picture found a home.--Procopius 15:12, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. It's near, so near... but it needs tidying up. And I'm too lazy to do it. 20:18, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
4. --L 14:20, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
Against Sorry, didn't get me. It is mildly amusing, at best. Not deletion material, but not feature either. It also loses something later on. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 03:55, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Against-only mildly funny-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 17:30, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. You've ruined camels at the zoo for me, and for that, I tip my hat to you sir. --Hhamdy283 05:00, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. --So So 07:07, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
For 203.211.77.250 10:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
FOR!!!!!. Hilarious. Utterly insensitive. I admire you. TheMono 11:11, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
I was so busy reading the article I forgot to vote for it. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:50, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
FOR Just the first picture is enough. --Savant13 21:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
For --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 21:47, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
For Absolutely hilarious. --Thetanmancan 03:37, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
For - I liked the pictures, anyway. Couldn't find a reason not to vote against it. --Just Joshin' Ya!
For Loved it. Simply. --T-Roooy 15:22, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Skip School

Score: +19 Unexcused Absences

Featured —rc (t) 05:48, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Self-Nomination and For. What can I say? Seems to me that it's of high enough caliber for VFH. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:55, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
I agree. The Octopus Method alone qualified this for me. The Freed Mind Sutoth Indar the Black Mage [MUN] [YvJP] 07:47, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
For. --Anyone 13:44, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I wish I had this when I was in high school. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 14:07, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
The dog ate my for vote. -- Hindleyite 19:52, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
lol--64.166.145.2 22:11, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Well done Squiggle--Wit (tawk) 01:23, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Most Definitely. Although, I wonder--you think Ghelae'll mind the not-so-subtle references? User:Wehpudicabok/sig 05:34, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
10/10. 07:45, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For. John1728 10:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For <rubs hands together> Now those royalties from "the Octopus Method" will come rollin' in!--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Le for. I just need to build a weather machine now. --User:SolarEquinox/sig 15:51, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Tick! --L 16:30, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
For --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 00:35, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Against. Its decent, but not all that original. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 03:49, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Heh. --Shade [...][Praise me/Yell at me][Worthless Additions] 4:00, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong for. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Forgery! -- cdr. thetoastman tlk ctr cun f@h 14:07, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For. This is a very useful piece of information, and I will need it in the future. Well, not really. But yeah, great article. --thematrixeætsyou, the ass kicker (talk) (flames) 23:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
For --67.169.166.24 05:37, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
against --JimmyB 06:01, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
For Pretty darn funny. --Thetanmancan 20:34, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
For Yeah I played hooky quite often.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 02:23, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
For --Han 03:30, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Kill two birds with one stone

Score: +18 budgies in the river, one flat river stone to hurl

Featured —rc (t) 03:56, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Nomination and for. One of my favorites. --So So 09:17, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. --L 14:25, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 14:28, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
Extreme For. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Good heavens, this is awesome...--<<>> 14:45, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 15:03, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I would've voted for it based on title alone, but I read the article and it just got better. —Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 15:29, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Another of Hardwick's gems. -- Hindleyite 17:17, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Somebody needs to check his medication. For once, that somebody isn't me.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:22, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For quite clever. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:39, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For I'm killing a few birds with one stone by editing this whole page, instead of each section. Take that WIKIBirds!-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 21:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
For. It is rare that I find, on a site such as this, an article that is so useful. Thank you Hardwick. You changed my life. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:41, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
For. 'Tis Hardwick, 'tis good.--Procopius 12:45, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
For. --Gubby 21:30, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Hate HowTos, but I just cant vote against this. Terrific. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 22:25, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
Pretty stupid.For.InfiniteMonkey 02:13, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
For--Shandon 15:34, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
For. The DaVinci method.--Wit (tawk) 01:24, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Sausage Butty Batter Nugget

Score: +16 well chewed gobbets

Featured —rc (t) 05:00, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Nomination and cholesterol-rich For. Heck, you can't argue with Russell Crowe. I know I don't fancy a phone in my mush. Anyway, I'm sure they sell these at my local chippy. --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 11:41, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
For. Napoleon Boneparte died alone and childless on the windswept island of St. Helena after a harpsichord fell through the ceiling and hit him on the head. I'm a sucker for rich imagery.--Procopius 11:53, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
For. dung has not just fallen out of cows, it has also fallen out of fashion. Pure genious, well done that man!--McBumlo 19:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
AF-FIR-MA-TIVE. This is my kind of random. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:44, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
Quatro I mean (Four), considering I helped inspire its creation (yes, I am God), and seeing as Snakes on a Plane isn't faring so well anyways.--Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 19:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
For, I blew chunks, it was so funny. --HP talk 16:22, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
I'm Lovin' It --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 07:10, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Against. I mean, it was okay, but then I read the other articles voted up at the moment, and it's not as good. If the competition was dreck then it would be a good vote: but then if there were no other guys in the world, I'd be up to here in ~~pussy~~ ~~chicks~~ female company, know what I mean? FreeMorpheme 21:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Hi-larious. I prefer this to Humosexual. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:42, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
For Jesus Christ this is amazing. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:25, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
What, you expect me to say "for" or something?? --User:Anidnmeno/sig 03:45, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
For I can't resist an article with hedgehogs. Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 12:23, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
For random food items. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 03:03, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
For Delicious! -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:42, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For. This is about on-par with the horror stories I've been told about English sandwiches. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Ew. - David Gerard 15:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong For and a "how the frick did I miss voting on this before?" Stupid me, 'cause this one's a ~~wiener~~ winner. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 07:10, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For Although it adds to the now enormous number of uses of the "masticate" as an innuendo --Jamtrousers 12:38, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment Mastication is nothing to be ashamed of. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 15:25, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

American Fundie Magazine

Score: +17 Amens from the audience

Featured —rc (t) 05:01, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

SN+F, I don't know if those being satirized will recognize this as, well, satire. Sometimes you just need to take the piss, as it were...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:39, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
For--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 18:53, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Mean-spirited and unfair, much like its target. For.--Procopius 19:50, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
For, even though I think I was misled. I sent all my money to that Cayman Islands PO Box, and yet God still didn't hear my prayers and strike down all the liberals, atheists, homos, hippies, Catholics, negros, young people, people with tans, and women in San Francisco, so I still can't find a parking space. --Falcotron 22:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Where's Sinner? --Donut Buy One!|F@H|MUN|NS|Please Help Me|. 02:56, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Yay.--Gubby 12:45, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
For. We shall march on a road of bones. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 16:12, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
Against. I am not saying that this article will never see the chance of getting featured, but how can I, as an anti-fundie proponent, possibly enjoy an article that protrays Ptolemaic Universe (which is an early Modern Catholic doctrine) as a 21st-century US Christian fundie idea? There are things that need not be there but are there anyway just for the sake of having more references (regardless of applicability). Yes, I know I am a bit harsh on this but I would rather vote for an article that is short but elegant and precise than one that is long but confusing and self-contradictory. -- The Colonel (talk) 09:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
(Discussion continued...)
- For. Now that's better. -- The Colonel (talk) 16:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Hohoho, this is funny. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:06, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Yes it is. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 05:22, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For because I hate Christians. (Note: I don't hate Christians.)—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 21:08, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment Note: Neither do I. Liberal Christians are all right, s'just those that take the book literally that boil my soup.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:07, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
For.--So So 07:00, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
Against for now - the article text tries to skewer the subject with a bludgeon. This is probably fixable with a rewrite of the existing text. But that image is VFP-worthy - David Gerard 07:41, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment "Sometimes it is best to scramble eggs with a hammer." Sun Tzu.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 11:16, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
For --~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p.
20:54, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
For but wait... *gasp*! I am unlucky vote #13! What an unGodly number! Jebus, cleanse me of whatever sin what I done! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 19:58, 14 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak For. Didn't get me at first, but after a reread I like the idea. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 04:59, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
For Love the Where's Sinner?.(EDIT--Sorry, realized I forgot to sign it.)--Ginchael 04:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
Most definitely For Should really be called "a guide to the Bible for smug atheists" though- but for that you need Mark 16:17-18 --Jamtrousers 18:49, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Disneyland

Score: +17 Dwarves

Featured —rc (t) 05:37, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

Nom and for. Entertaining and all the assorted links make me happy. A great body of work --Cycliclythium 19:35, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
For, very creative. Logixoul 21:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
Weak for. A good parody of a Wikipedia entry on foreign countries. This will be a stonger endorsement if the redlinks are cleaned up.--Procopius 12:16, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
Sure. --L 12:27, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
For Nice job. -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 01:03, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
Very for: Classic! Why did it take this long to be nominated, and why aren't many people voting for this? Vote, you bastards!!—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 04:11, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
For Because it's good ~McDestroyertron (talk) 04:16, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
For, I guess. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:10, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Excellent. 70.103.20.120 23:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Damn good... --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 04:27, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
For. It's funny, more exposure will help fill out some red links. --68.231.149.139 17:36, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Because this has fewer calories and goes down smoother than the regular brands. Wait, what were we talking about? Oh yea. Article r0x0rz, which in haX0r sp33k means "Dude!" --Captain Finding Nemo 06:01, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Long overdue, the Disneyland cycle is what hooked me on this site -- Rljenk 03:12, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
For I really like this one. It has a real place, references to a real place, and is a great parody of real country articles. Top-notch! » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:47, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
for A worthy tome, the pinnacle for me was "Maus macht frei". Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 22:16, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
For, gets saved from stagnation removal because it made me laugh.--<<>> 18:46, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I'm sure I already voted for this, but I can't find my vote. --User:Falcotron/sig 01:32, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
For It's very creative...there should be more articles like these. --KUK nerd 05:57, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Suburban homeboy

Score: +19izzles

Featured —rc (t) 04:56, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Not nom (that was Mister Nosey), but for. This page speaks to me as though it was writ by my own hand. Which it was. Plus I spent way too long 'shopping a pic of Vanilla Ice to make him even dorkier not to render a self-centred "for".--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:48, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 12:30, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Oh all right, For...--Shandon 17:10, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For-- 19:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Great stuff. Might even be better than all the stuff <insert name here> has done (and that's saying a lot).--Procopius 20:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Need I say for? --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 22:25, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
Fo'. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 03:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
For. great stuff! -- mowgli 14:27, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Conditional for. Needs categories. Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Done. If you can think of any more (or more appropriate) cats, feel free to add them.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:21, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
Fozizzor, my dilznoofuses. --User:Falcotron/sig 21:51, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
For Pure greatness in a can! --Hhamdy283 00:23, 4 September 2006 (UTC) (Wow Procopius, I am flattered. I did not know my four pages were of such high calibre)
~~Against until it doesn't warrant a "bloody ugly" template for its formatting. Then it'll be possible to evaluate the content - David Gerard 15:20, 4 September 2006 (UTC)~~ Much better. For - David Gerard 10:07, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment Fo'matting's in place, yo. Jus' ugly now, not ugizzle with da' bloodizzle. (Or words to that effect)--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
For, but I agree with David Gerard, needs a fix up. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:06, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Fo' sho. -- cdr. thetoastman tlk ctr cun f@h 11:41, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
The flab be down wit deez shiit!--Flabius-Danner 09:15, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
Fo'shizzle. Funiest article I've read in a while. ~~-Please sit back, relax, and sign your votes... -- Sir C Holla | CUN 20:44, 10 September 2006 (UTC)~~ reinstated
Comment Damn! Admiral06 at 12:16, 10 September 2006 must be frontin'! Only whack fools don't sign their votes, yo! --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 20:47, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Comment Link me the diff and it'll count. Yo. —rc (t) 06:06, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
It's all up in this, a'ight?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 06:15, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. This was my fav in the Illustrated Article portion of Poo Lit. I especially love the hand-drawn pic that starts things off. Fun writing, too. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 06:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
AF-FIR-MIZ-ZLE-BI-ATCH-EZ. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 20:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Strong for. John1728 02:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
Comment Damn, yo! This is twice now...sign your edits John1728, or they don't count for nuthin'. Peace!--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:34, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Whachu talkin' bout, fool? The bitches were sizzle'd. You just didn't take the advancing waves into account in your calculatizzles... aw, fuck. I'll remember next time. Unless of course I forget. John1728 02:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC) Good that you back a brutha up. Peace out.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 02:46, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Medical Malpractice

Score: +19 ambulance-chasing lawsuits

Featured —rc (t) 06:10, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Nom and for. Humourous healthcare helps hernias hurt! --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 13:36, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For GSPbeetle ^{complains Vandalisms} 14:18, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For. --L 14:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For. I love infectious steel.-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 15:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Most excellent. Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:17, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For, funny. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 18:13, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Severian put a great deal of ~~sharp, unsterilized medical instruments~~ work into this, and it's excellent.--Procopius 23:11, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For. -- ~~VFP~~ Eincyc (talk) 23:21, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For, not just because it proves that Pee Review isn't useless (well, maybe it doesn't prove that, because most of the best jokes had nothing to do with the input at Pee Review, but because it's infectiously funny. --User:Falcotron/sig 00:15, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
NURSE! NURSE! GET THAT SPONGE OUT OF ME! oh...and FOR.-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 16:42, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
For, and while I've got you on the line..Doctor, why are both of my implants on the same side?--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:32, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
For. And they said it couldn't be done... t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 04:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC) 04:31, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
For and now will you stop buggin me? i kid of course. good article! The HRH MuCal. Tayor MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)
For I liked the pictures. --Savant13 14:06, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
For...Severian is smarter than you or I.--Shandon 04:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
For. This is the most amount of deserving articles I've seen on VFH at one time, which kinda sucks because I came here looking to be a bastard and vote against a bunch of shite. Not so, fate says. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 07:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For I hear people get this a lot? it's what they wants!? 128.82.58.58 19:59, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For?—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 02:56, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
For I love medical malpractice. This article is an inspiration to malpracticers. And I think it's hilarious.--65.175.203.110 00:13, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
For total stroke of genius *haw haw* --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 00:42, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

HowTo:Write A Cover Letter

Score: +20.5 Cover Letters

Featured —rc (t) 05:35, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Nomination - Seems very high in quality. It also won the Poo Lit Surprise contest.--Mister Nosey 22:21, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Procopius is a funny guy. Plus this page not only didn't get me a job, it somehow cost me a testicle.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:25, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
For -- ~~VFP~~ Eincyc (talk) 22:37, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Funny. --Falcotron 23:39, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Forish... I really dont like featuring HowTos, but this is a rare exception. And just for the record : This vote never happened. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 02:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
For. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:50, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Forrrrrrrr.—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 08:40, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
For. Don't PLS winners get featured automatically? -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 15:24, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
For. -- Hindleyite 18:41, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
Self vote for. Nothing to see here.--Procopius 20:05, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
For-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 20:37, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
For HowTos Crazyswordsma n...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 22:47, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
For 'Tis good. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:27, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Strong For. Excellent. Weppy, the Wehpudicabok -- Hi there! (ticker tape) 05:24, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
Weak against. I like it, but it doesn't have what the French call a certain... I don't know what. --Oblivion - Fire - Sex [O|F|S] MUN CM NS F@H (drivel) 16:01, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment. Je nais se quoi? Savoir-faire? Sang-froid? Noblesse oblige? Just pulling French phrases as I go . . .:)--Procopius 17:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

FOR As usual. Anything by Mr. Pro is A++ in my book. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:00, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
For. A very deserved winner deserves featuring, verily. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 04:59, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
Yep. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 17:44, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
As Teal'c would say, Indeed --Savant13 14:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
Aye this is great stuff. --Nydas 18:14, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
'For top quality --Blue eagle 08:53, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For nice! 128.82.58.58 20:00, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
For. It sure has that, ummmm, what the French call, I think, joint nasal quack --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 21:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
For I'm usually not one for "HowTo:" articles, but I do enjoy this one.--King Charles the IIIrd 21:12, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

UnNews:Diogenes searches world for honest mechanic

Score: +19 vroom vrooms

Featured Here's to voting rights for UnNews articles. —rc (t) 04:30, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Nom and for. Well written and funny. InfiniteMonkey 01:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Nor should UnNews articles. --User:Anidnmeno/sig 01:29, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
For. This is a perfectly brilliant cynical slab of comedy mothballs. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 01:47, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Against. Unless it is terrific, UnNews shouldnt be featured. It needs its own VFH kinda thing, though. -- Sir Cornbread The Great [SHOUT] [MUN] [GET THIS FEATURED!] 01:51, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
For It is terrific. I mean, I agree, but this is fucking great. Diogenes makes anything better. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:59, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Voting For my own work, so take this with a grain of salt. Thanks for the nod, Infinite Monkey.--Procopius 02:07, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Yep. Now, back in the tub I go. -- Imrealized 02:33, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
For. Greek philosopher + UnNews = win —Sir Major Hinoa [TALK] [KUN] 05:15, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

Damn it Hinoa, don't vote while I'm voting ;) --Donut Buy One!|F@H|MUN|NS|Please Help Me| 05:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)

For, and the new transmission is gonna cost ya $700. --Donut Buy One!|F@H|MUN|NS|Please Help Me| 05:16, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Against. NFU -- Never. Feature. UnNews. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 13:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
AF-FIR-MA-TIVE!!! And Mycroft agrees. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:30, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
For. Hilarious.--<<>> 13:36, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Ford. Recall notices are Job #2. --Carlb 23:06, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
Comment I think this would work better repackaged as an UnBook.-- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 03:59, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

*Against Not a big fan of featuring UnNews either. --em c ! ╬ 00:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

FOR! -- I changed my vote because I now support the featuring of UnNews. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 21:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

For I liked it when I read it in the UnNews before seeing it here. » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 06:04, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
For one good idea cheerfully executed. -- The Colonel (talk) 06:48, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
FOR. I don't think saying that it's UnNews justifies voting against this article, and it's possibly the best one so far. Wehpudicabok 05:07, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
For.--Gubby 22:35, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
for Hilarious! Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 10:14, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
For One of Procopius' gems, and I am (obviously) all for featuring UnNews articles when they are worthy. --Composure1 20:51, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
For Great! -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 14:46, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
For - David Gerard 15:53, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
For because it's been up here forever so it should be featured already, dammit. Also, it's good.—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 20:55, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
For. Wups, forgot to vote before...--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:39, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
For. So I look up Diogenes on Wikipedia and read it, then I read this. Awesome. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:24, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

War of 1812

Score: +19 foiled invasions of Canada

Featured —rc (t) 06:11, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Nomination and For -- An absolutely hilarious article, although it could use some minor tunings. A large portion of this is the work of DWIII and Procopius. --Hotadmin4u69^[TALK] 02:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
For--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 02:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Conditional For. The only problem I see is the massive amount of red links. Change that, and sure. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 02:58, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Comment. Agreed. Redlinks are cleaned up now -- but pace Falcotron, I challenge someone to come up with articles for Francis Scott Key, Willard Scott, Rock 'N Roll Hall of Fame, Ralph Lauren and so on.--Procopius 01:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Francis Scott Key or Ralph Lauren would be hard work, but could be very funny; Willard Scott and Rock 'N Roll Hall of Fame should be easy (but probably not that funny). --Falcotron 03:40, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
For. H.M.S. Custom, Common Law and Royal and Parliamentary Decisions? You don't need a press gang to get me on board. -- Sir Armando Perentie KUN FP 03:29, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
For!—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 06:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
I'll vote For for just about anyone who defeats the French. Oh, and it was extremly funny as well. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 06:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
For Modusoperandi 06:57, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
For I glanced at four bits and all made me laugh. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:16, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
For The impressment jokes alone... um... impressed me. Even funnier if you know the Great Lakes area. By the way, most of the red links are things that really should exist, but sadly they don't. --Falcotron 08:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
For: A great article on a great war. H.M.S. Custom, Common Law and Royal and Parliamentary Decisions is pure genius. --Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH22:39, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
Self vote for. This is why I love Uncyclopedia: My joke about the English Constitution would be met with blank stares anywhere else. :)--Procopius 01:27, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
Oh come on; not even ED would give you blank stares. They'd just say, "Dude, that's like a long, boring-ass name, lulz" and edit it to "H.M.S. Fag." --Falcotron 01:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
For One of those few truly funny articles. --Iambusyeating 16:07, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
1814. I love the note. --Donut Buy one!|Get one Free!|F@H|MUN 01:42, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
For -- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 19:01, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
For --Stan Lather 22:44, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
For Cleverly funny! It amused me how the author managed to slip in some vanity stuff and [somehow] made it even more funny. Go penguins! --KUK nerd 20:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
For I busted a gut, split my sides, amputated my right leg and sacrificed my firstborn son to the Elder Gods reading this! (P.S. only take the first two seriously). -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:53, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
For Good stuff. InfiniteMonkey 18:07, 6 September 2006 (UTC)
For because I wanna invade Quebec! User:Wehpudicabok/sig 05:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)