This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Keep and Rewrite I'll take this one on. She deserves better that this balloon knot of an article. Dame GUNPotYWotM2xPotM17xVFHVFPPooPMS•YAP• 16:33, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete
delete. so random i have no idea what this is. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Kept PP is sorting it. Sue me. MrNFork you! 17:42, Jul 13
Canadian Idiot
Keep
Delete
Delete. Oh jeez. Albumcruft? 2005cruft? Listcruft? It's all here, folks. It may have been created by insertwackynamehere way back when, but as far as I can see it's another example of "good in 2005 =/= good now". The history doesn't yield any gold either. Any objections to this going? --UU - natter11:45, Jul 8
delete. it was a decent stub by 2005 standards, but it's become really crufty. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. While the article is shit, I think if someone would remove the true junk and polish what's left a little bit, there might be a semi-decent stub left. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM15:20, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Wikipedia confirms its existence. Big enough for niche-notability. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:57, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
My girlfriend in my freshman year of college was from Plano, Texas. She was out of her fucking mind. Anyway, there's like two hundred fifty thousand people there. It's the size of Reno. And we have an article on University of Nevada, Reno. Which isn't a great article, but its section on athletics is top-notch. What was I talking about? Oh yeah, stay off my fucking lawn. pillow talk 20:11, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. It needs to be sliced open on an operating table and given a bunch of new organs, but I can see the potential. Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 11:52, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Local town that may as well not exist. Cleaned up quite a bit of vanity and cruft, but what's leftover is simply random and local humor. -RAHB 16:39, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. I think for any small town/city to be kept - they should at least have some interest outside their immediate area. eg. somewhere like Waco (or is that going to be renamed Wacko after Michael Jackson ?--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 06:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Comment, just to be clear here, the size of the city or whether I've heard of it or not is hardly a reason to delete. The reason to delete is the content, which I think is really not good. -RAHB 06:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
No, it isn't good, but I don't think it's so awful that we can't just let the editorial process deal with it. pillow talk 18:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Redundant template, no longer in use since that AAP thing came around, or whatever it's called. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:35, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete, but see my comment below for further instructions. --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 23:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
delete. it's on 3 talk pages, and hasn't been added in over a year. seems redundant. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
{{AAP}} is intended to be placed directly on the article, while {{reqphoto}} is designed to be placed on the corresponding talk page. Do we need such a template for talk pages? If so, then consider creating {{AAP-talk}} using wording derived from {{AAP}}. --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 23:08, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
It's still used on a few pages... MrNFork you! 07:38, Jul 5
suggest the template be reqill - i.e. require illustration (i.e. photo, painting,drawing, sticky finger etchings etc). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 10:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. It's a one-line joke that's already been done a number of times but it's been fleshed out with a bundle of nothing. Redemption cometh in the form of a bulldozer. --Pup 22:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
I couldn't even bring myself to read it. pillow talk 23:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Changing to abstain. I don't like it very much, but upon actually reading it, at least it's coherent. pillow talk 00:16, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
The Moral of the Story: Read things before you vote for them! *smacks with newspaper* --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Rewrite or colonise - this will return, and return in far worse form. It needs hefty improvement, but how about having a word with Guildy and setting one of his UnWhateveritis mob on it? --UU - natter12:02, Jul 8
This is one of the first articles that I ever read here. I still think it's funny. Why? Beats the hell out of me. I don't even like the band anymore, and it certainly is crap compared to, uh........whatever most of you think is good stuff (I really don't read jack on this website, to be quite honest with you all). So, yeah. I dig it. Cuz I'm stupid. --RomanDogBird!!!!!:D :D :D :D :D :D :D 15:43, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Don't be silly. It's got thousands of edits.MrNFork you! 23:05, Jul 8
Sorry, I was voting on the quality of the article. My mistake. (THIS IS SARCASM!!! I am employing sarcasm as my low paid bitch.)mAttlobster. (hello) 11:26, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
The quality of the article at which version? MrNFork you! 12:23, Jul 9
How about the one that's there now. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
In fact how about any of the 1000's of versions Mr Clever-remark. Actually I'm going to leave in a huff, this whole process is a big pile of cock these days -not like the glory days...those...beautiful sunny afternoons spent deleting based on the quality of an article. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:44, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Strong Rewrite This may suck, but it's one of those pages that everyone goes and looks for because they're such a big band. The page has well over 1000 edits sence march 05, and If it gets deleted, random people will just recreate it to just the same crappy crap it is now. The only way to fix that is to get it featured probably, or damn near close. Plus, its not all suck. Also, I've just summed up everything that everyone has said before me, BUT IT MATTERS NOT! LieutenantTHEDUDEMANDude...TotallyUOTMKUNGotAF@H 18:28, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete None of it is at all funny. The concept established in the introduction is quickly forgotten and then deteriorates into what I can only describe as nothing. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:33, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Purple tights I don't think there is much of quality in this piece, either, and I've been struggling to work out a way to improve it short of a direct nuclear strike. I do like the Wikipedian idiot image, but nothing in the rest of it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byPuppyOnTheRadio (talk • contribs)
keep. old joke, sure. but it wasn't old last august, when this was created. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
keep. I think I would like it better if it were brettfarvebrettfarvebrettfarvebrettfarve, but this is good parody. WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 15:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
OptimusChris: all unnews older than a month outlive their uselessness. Can we all just agree not to delete any UnNewses ever again? --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
delete. slogged through the history for a while but couldn't find anything decent. delete & redirect to the far, far, far, far, far superior Lord Sauron. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:29, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. And redirect, per Gerry. --UU - natter08:38, Jul 8
“That fucking prick...I forged the One Ring to spy on little boys and this bastard steals it and starts yelling about how he's going to use it to "rule them all". All he's ever going to rule is my foot up his ass!” --RomanDogBird!!!!!:D :D :D :D :D :D :D 17:12, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. And redirect, per Gerry. MrNFork you! 15:52, Jul 9
you're treading in dangerous lands, increasing the number of noms to 21 while some are inactive. or you would be, if you couldn't just unblock yourself. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:17, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
That's 19 active noms right? Maybe I need my glasses... MrNFork you! 14:24, Jul 9
yup, 2 are deleted. just seems weird to see the table of contents go up to 21, you can almost hear the banstick whistling through the air...SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:35, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Deleted and redirected to Homer. --UU - natter14:53, Jul 10
The Legendary White Teletubby
Keep
Delete
Delete. The epitimy of useless, random drivel. Dylanlip (talk) 11:57, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. It could use a steamroller, but not a full delete. It'll only come back even crappier than before. I personally suggest Colonization. Dylanlip (talk) 11:09, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. The older versions in the history are not too shabby, actually. It just needs someone with more patience than me to sift through, pick out the best one, revert it all the way back, and it'll be OK. --UU - natter11:15, Jul 9
...such as MrN, for instance... --UU - natter15:09, Jul 9
I was actually gonna make asinine categories my new crusade. Damn you Dylanlip! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. /me takes tin opener to large can of worms. ZOMG Mooses, Uncyc history, keep keep keep. Pfft. Vanity. If we deleted TYATU (rightly), this should follow it. QDB it, if you want, but not a mainspace article, surely. --UU - natter13:34, Jul 8
delete. i can't see how the 'vanity' argument can be refuted. it certainly doesn't belong in the mainspace. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:44, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. This gives rubbish a bad name ! Atrocious...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 10:37, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Umm... what? Dylanlip (talk) 11:11, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Category:Marblefluss
Keep
Delete
Delete. Why does this still exist? Dylanlip (talk) 20:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Last edit by user Marblefluss March 2008 - I doubt this is likely to be used again, and if it is then it can be re-created. --Pup 22:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Although honestly I think this would be appropriate for QVFD. No content... just... leftover shit left over from some shit or some shit like that. pillow talk 23:22, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. Could probably have gone on QVFD as an effectively unused vanity category. Deleted, anyway. --UU - natter10:23, Jul 9
Halowarz
Keep
Strong keep. I liked it. Dump the templates at the start, change it to an UnTweet or some other format, kill the section edits, fix the spelling, and it has some small promise. —The preceding unsigned comment was added byPuppyOnTheRadio (talk • contribs)
What is it about this page that makes me forget to sign? --Pup 23:13, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Weak keep. I don't think it's funny, but I feel like there's a joke in there that somebody might get. Plus, no one is going to say "I can believe this wiki has a shitty article on Halowarz!" If this was in a more mainstream place, I'd want it deleted, but as it stands... eh... I think it can stay. pillow talk 23:25, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Well spotted Gerry. I'm sorry to those who voted keep, but I'm not going to allow people to abuse the ICU system and get away with it. If the author wants it back they can contact me. MrNFork you! 14:47, Jul 9
Delete. Garbage. Dylanlip (talk) 17:23, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
"The game was rated the 3/4 second but not yet third (that would have to be 4/4 second) worst game show." SPEAK ENGLISH. pillow talk 23:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. ICU escapologist, could possibly have been QVFD'd as such. However it is irredeemable wibble. --UU - natter13:20, Jul 8
One of the most incoherent pieces of shit that I have ever seen. ballsballsballsballsballsballsballs Michael Jackson. --RomanDogBird!!!!!:D :D :D :D :D :D :D 16:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Michael Jackson is a pedophile. I'm not entirely sure whether that statement is true. However, I am sure of one thing: it is not funny. pillow talk 23:19, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Uncyclopedia:Everything you ever wanted to know about Uncyclopedia: It sucks
Keep
Delete
Delete. It was already huffed before. Stupid one-liner that was brought back. Dylanlip (talk) 20:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Woops. It only appears to still exist. Sorry! Dylanlip (talk) 20:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Template:Really Random Sighting
Keep
Hell no. It's one of my favorites. And we can always use more Elvis in this site. Always. ~ 14:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC) Hang on, I'm an idiot. I meant {{Really random sighting}}. If you nominate that I'll castrate you. ~ 14:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
I'll still castrate you though. I'd been looking for an excuse to do that for years. ~ 14:26, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
i actually started researching {{Really random sighting}} after stumbling upon the bigfoot version with the intent to VFD it, but instead discovered its awesomeness. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:31, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Facts detected? Yeah, and no bloody funny. I'd have ICU'd this bugger, but as it missed that fate, can we get rid of it here, please? --UU - natter11:14, Jul 8
Delete 5 seconds into it and I've worked out that this is a couple of guys out of arts school who have been trying to make a name for themselves using Wikipedia and have been booted off there so coming over here for a home. Boot away! —The preceding unsigned comment was added byPuppyOnTheRadio (talk • contribs)
Delete As soon as possible!--SunnyChow 11:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
delete. this seems pointless. a google search turns up...this page. if i've missed the joke, please enlighten me. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
delete My mobile number starts with 07798. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Not really much of anything. Sounds like the writer was forced to study it or play it which might explain the bile. !--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 07:17, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. You seem to be confusing "stagnant joke" with "running theme". --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:21, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. An unfunny stub that's barely linked to, and uses the stagnant joke of referring to them as a musical group. Plus, it already failed Vfd and for some reason wasn't deleted. Put it out of it's misery. Dylanlip (talk) 17:40, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Abstain. I see this has also been down for VFH before as well. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 10:22, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
it failed VFD in may, was deleted, was recreated, and was rewritten by longliver who has been very active in putting effort this article. please do a little more research before nomming something being actively worked on. also, this has never been on VFH. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, actually. Sidesteps much of the random humor that one would expect of a World War N article by keeping the actual wars vague and focusing on the tone of the writing. All in all a very well done article. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:20, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Keep. Formatting not good but otherwise a keep. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 10:23, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
keep as per TKF. a rare instance where a lack of details is beneficial to the article. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:58, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
delete. sure enough, there's an animal rape if you look closely enough, which i don't recommend doing. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:53, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. Could be moved to Green Day article if there is anything reusable..spare wheel. hubcaps,
radio..--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 08:43, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete.Whyalla is a medium sized town in the central-north of South Australia, inhabited entirely by left-handed Spaniard midgets. The reasons for this odd demographic distribution are unknown..Oh...and I was so looking forward to the idea behind that joke ! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 07:14, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy redirectification. To that page Dylanlip mentioned, 'cause it's the eldest, and they're the same. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 07:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
Absolut
Keep
Delete
Disintegrate. Unfunny beer cruft. Saberwolf116 06:16, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. This is certainly a weak mixture but it shows promise in perhaps more experienced hands.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 08:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. per above. --Mn-z 16:09, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 15:49, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Disintegrate. More bandcruft. Saberwolf116 16:01, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Okay, maybe it's not as bad as I initially thought. I'm changing my vote to Abstain. It could use some more content though. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM21:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
NO why does this need more content??? Articles don't need to be any longer than this if they work as they are. People who pad articles out because they are deemed to be 'too short' should be fed to horses. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:59, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Abstain. Not the worst but it really is more an extended Undictionary joke. stick it there ? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 22:35, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete, not because it's shocking, but because A) Osama Bin Laden jokes are so 2002; and B) Team America jokes are so 2004. pillow talk 01:56, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete. but, Modus is probably going to speedy-keep it anyway. Therefore, I decided to be italic and removed it both mainspace articles it was in. Also, its a donkey, not a camel. --Mn-z 04:31, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Hey! I remember SOADLuver! He had terrible taste, except for this, which is almost funny! Exclamation! Delete. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 06:52, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete Though TKF closed the vote apparently... I still think the image suxs. MrNFork you! 09:44, Jul 3
Some clarification: An image is an image, the guy photoshopped it and put in some work for it, and hell, since it isn't even in the mainspace anymore (nice job doing that in an attempt to delete this, mnb!) then it is especially not harming anyone. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 07:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
WoW Hang on a second please? Um. Sorry TKF dude, but like what is going on here? This looks like a reasonable VFD vote (which was) in progress to me. Maybe the nom reason suxs, but still... I actually rather fancy voting delete myself as the image (as Modus points out) is well... Um. Pants? I can't see anywhere it could be used. If it's just for a userpage then what are we doing here? Hosting people's blogs? It's got to be useful in the mainspace (and the quality is so low it's not going to be IMO)... Shock image? No. Pants? Yes. VFD? Shall we? MrNFork you! 09:44, Jul 3
Catwoman
Keep
Keep. For some reason, I just burst out laughing when I saw the image. I also liked the kitten huffing references. --Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 15:34, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
Delete
I usually don't like deletions, but there isn't anything redeemable about this page. Might as well let someone just start from scratch....hehehe. Get it? Scratch! She's Catwoman! Come one, you get it right! Ha! WoodyOnFire!Talking WoodyStalking Woody 17:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I am vehemently opposed to the deletion of UnNews articles. Despite the plagiarism, this isn't bad enough to delete for me. --Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 15:27, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Disintegrate. I know we don't normally delete UnNews, but we cannot let this live in 2009. Saberwolf116 14:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete on principle. AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA clones are crap. --SirDJ~Irreverent 14:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete Harmless enough - but not funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 06:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete and redirect per Socky. --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 20:28, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. AAAA and the next 25 unnews articles just using one letter of the alphabet in case someone writes them .--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 22:37, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 15:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
'Delete FOR FUCK'S SAKE! WRESTLING!??? Delete the dumb non-sport wank-fest that is the sport dance of wrestling from the planet. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:33, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
Disintegrate.Saberwolf116 15:24, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
FACT: this isn't funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:19, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Sean Connors
Keep
Delete
Delete. If this isn't vanity that slipped the QVFD net, then it is at least unmitigated bollocks that deserves no mercy. Either way, get rid. --UU - natter12:47, Jun 29
Delete. and move to <The Wiki Which Must Not Be Named> if its not complete bullocks. --Mn-z 13:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Strikers? Are We Folk!
Keep
Delete
Delete. Only the one edit - the day it was created in Jan '08. Only one page links to it - this one. Only one idea - not very good footy players form folk band, which is pointless in extremis and not funny. Poor execution etc etc - get rid. --UU - natter12:19, Jun 29
Delete. shit obviously, but I think an article about how people sort of grow into their names (which this almost was and then really wasn't) isn't a bad idea. I mean have you ever met a Fiona who wasn't a complete cow? Or a Mike who wasn't someones best man? Orian57Talk13:22 29 June 2009
Bless. It's making fun of metal. I personally don't believe in deleting templates unless they are absolutely horrible, and this isn't anywhere near horrible. In fact, it's actually pretty funny in context. --Aethix ~ Talk|Contributions|My project 12:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Delete Useless comment template that's twice as big as it needs to be. --Mn-z 01:56, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. If an article needs a template to inform people about how metal it is, it isn't so metal. SirModusoperandiBoinc! 01:58, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per above. --Mn-z 15:45, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Obviously not written by a moron but this isn't going to fly anywhere and looks sad and abandoned. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 17:23, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Going nowhere fast. --UU - natter12:27, Jun 29
What they done said. Out of every article purge that has appeared on VFD, this is by far the easiest to fix. I was actually thinking of fixing a few of them up myself until I got distracted by, y'know, real life. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Kerkill "1712 The letter e is murdered by i, who is jealous of e's relationship with a. e is later resurrected, along with the number 7 and bell-bottom pants. 7 later ate 9, thus increasing his strength, and took revenge on whomever killed him." Really? That is just stupid... MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 17:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per genociding time lines. --Mn-z 18:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Nothing to improve upon, and unnecessary. "This page has a lot of links" is not a valid reason to have it. Content is king, not how much it links to, and there isn't any content here. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 19:27 Jun 23, 2009
Delete It's not genocide it's getting rid of unfunny shit. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:30, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Agreed. Random unfunny. Perhaps this concept can be brought back one day. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 21:39, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
This is just me further elaborating why the timeline needs to be huffed (other than the exceptions which have already been pointed out): The timeline is no doubt one of the most popular sections of the site (Well, that what this page claims. See how eight or so of the articles in the timeline are in the top 500?) which means it is likely to be one of the first things people see when they come here. If I were a noob and one of these pages was the first thing I see, I'd think either, "Hey, this site likes my random jokes about celebrities and Pokemon! I'm gonna edit a bunch of pages to have this stuff!", or, "What the hell?! This site is for stupid middle schoolers who just say poorly thought out jokes about penises and Paris Hilton or who steal all their jokes from Family Guy and South Park without being funny! I mean, Family Guy is a good show (not so much South Park, though), but these fucking kids ruin it! Also, CHUCK NORRIS IS NOT FUNNY!". So this is either a festering ground for unfunny memes which leak out to the rest of the site or a deterrent for potential readers/editors that we want. A rewrite of these articles won't be done, or at least won't be done with any of what is there, so why not delete it? Guild may be interested in writing a brief history of time (Damn Stephen Hawking and his running over of people's cats!), which can replace the timeline. Okay, that's all I have to say... I rest my poorly worded case. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 20:27, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I agree. I also think if somebody has put honest hard effort into an article then maybe it should be treated more sympatherically. These timeline articles have no care taken on them. Just random people spewing a quick random, badly conceived spunk puddle. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:07, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
The reason these pages appear so high on that list is because pretty much any article with a number for a title redirects to its respective year on the timeline. •Spang•☃•talk• 22:56, 23 Jun 2009
It should also be noted that deleting the entire timeline will create exactly 2,255 broken redirects. Rather you than me clearing those up! •Spang•☃•talk• 23:10, 23 Jun 2009
Why not just delete all the content from these articles but leave the year headings. Then have an Uncyclopedia History Week where all are encouraged to fill them in. mAttlobster. (hello) 06:43, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
I'd suggest a pruning more than total deletion. There might be some content that makes sense. --Mn-z 15:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Let's at least get a celebrity to do the pruning. I'm thinking Sting. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:50, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
What they done said. Out of every article purge that has appeared on VFD, this is by far the easiest to fix. I was actually thinking of fixing a few of them up myself until I got distracted by, y'know, real life. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Kerkill "1086 Tina Fey is born on June 31. Her twin Sarah Palin is born on June 32.", "1288Oprah holds an international contest to see how many loyal fans can consume 6 servings of her delicious toilet logs and recommend the experience to viewers as part of her "Defication of the Month" fetish club.", and "1360 October 14 - Tom Cruise is attacked by a sofa." Yep. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 17:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete.1696 "Matt Damon apparently invents anal sex." 1000 "some mute kid named chrono gets pulled ito saving the world by his bisexual girlfreind and the crossdressing princess. hilarity ensues when the princess accidentally commits suicide, by making her grandma gender confused, after time traveling to the cockroach king to save her." --Mn-z 18:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Nothing to improve upon, and unnecessary. "This page has a lot of links" is not a valid reason to have it. Content is king, not how much it links to, and there isn't any content here. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 19:27 Jun 23, 2009
DELETE THis is the kind of shit that if someone new to Uncyclopedia saw, would scare them off for life. GET RID OF IT! 'The first Mac crashes in terrible explosion, causing the extinction of Pokémon' is one of the better jokes...and it's not even a joke. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:35, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
What they done said. Out of every article purge that has appeared on VFD, this is by far the easiest to fix. I was actually thinking of fixing a few of them up myself until I got distracted by, y'know, real life. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Kerkill Unfunny, poorly written, stupid, cruft-filled, and idiotic. Plus, it attracts vanity. A rewrite wouldn't use anything that's there. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 17:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. this is beyond redemption. --Mn-z 18:42, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Nothing to improve upon, and unnecessary. "This page has a lot of links" is not a valid reason to have it. Content is king, not how much it links to, and there isn't any content here. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 19:27 Jun 23, 2009
Delete This is really not very good at all is it? mAttlobster. (hello) 20:32, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Categorically against this whole "genocide". How easy it is to delete rather than to place some work and improve. Did anyone bother to look at how many pages this one links to? ~ 18:24, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
As per the jew. I'm not a Deletionist, I'd sooner see people actually looking to improve things like this than just ditching the whole thing. Even if I've got to do it myself. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
As per the cabalists. -RAHB 22:46, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
What they done said. Out of every article purge that has appeared on VFD, this is by far the easiest to fix. I was actually thinking of fixing a few of them up myself until I got distracted by, y'know, real life. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Strategic Keep cleanup would be too hard. --Mn-z 15:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Kerkill Well, I think I've already listed valid reasons for the other nominations, I guess this one is actually just because I hate Jesus, and I'm trying to erase the part of history he existed in. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 17:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. per the other reasons given. --Mn-z 18:33, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Nothing to improve upon, and unnecessary. "This page has a lot of links" is not a valid reason to have it. Content is king, not how much it links to, and there isn't any content here. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 19:27 Jun 23, 2009
Delete Not the sort of thing that should be on Uncyclopedia. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:39, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Removal them all and leave none to reproach us afterwards. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 21:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Dexter, please don't flood them all in at once. Saberwolf116 17:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Mordillo, if you're concerned about the number of red links that this will make then we should have This page does not exist, as it is one of the most linked to pages despite being a red link. This will just be the second most linked to red link, which probably won't last long as the broken redirects created by deleting this will be deleted quickly, lowering it to below WHotM. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 20:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I saw what looked like a concern about creating a bunch of red links so I went to the old standby of why red links aren't a problem. Or something. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 20:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
To those of you voting to keep the article: I would really appreciate it if you'd clarify your views and/or your concerns in the forum so we can all get an idea as to why. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 22:59 Jun 23, 2009
I knew it was too good to be true. Saberwolf116 23:00, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I think it might be possible to rewrite a completely differently, completely new timeline of some type but only after completely deleting the current mess. Trying to rewrite what's already there is a horrible, slow, process. I tried to do a spot of editing ("random"-cruffing, mostly) on the 1AD-999AD article and it was horrible and pretty-much all undone with weeks by people popping-up to say that Al Gore invented golf in 575AD. It needs to be rebuilt from the ground up. --Zarbag 14:58, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
(arbitrary outdent) If this is deleted, then all redirects to it from numbers (2, 3...) need to be retargeted to the corresponding number articles (2 (number), 3 (number)...). --Pentium5dot1t~^_^~c 01:22, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
What they done said. Out of every article purge that has appeared on VFD, this is by far the easiest to fix. I was actually thinking of fixing a few of them up myself until I got distracted by, y'know, real life. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Strategic Keep cleanup would be too hard. --Mn-z 15:14, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete
Kerkill Unfunny, poorly written, Zac Efron is the first person mentioned followed by RuneScape, and the word etcetera. MegaPleb•Dexter111344•Complain here 17:23, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Disintegrate.Saberwolf116 17:48, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. not random enough, needs more decimal years and random anachronism. --Mn-z 18:36, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
I flip-flopped again. Turns out this is only one year. --Mn-z 05:30, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
Delete. Nothing to improve upon, and unnecessary. "This page has a lot of links" is not a valid reason to have it. Content is king, not how much it links to, and there isn't any content here. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 19:27 Jun 23, 2009
Delete The others may be needed but this one is only one year and does an appallingly poor job at it. I also don't like the idea of keeping an article not based on content when the content is QVFD quality. Can you at least read it and vote based on the contents of the article, that is the purpose of VFD. I couldn't find one funny line in it. --SirDJ~Irreverent 09:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Comments
Also this is the least popular of the timeline articles, so would really be the least missed. --SirDJ~Irreverent 15:11, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
You all realize that this is only a ONE year article just making sure everybody noticed that. And to add insult to injury, the calendar goes from 1 bc. directly to 1 ad, so this "year" was not existent. --Mn-z 15:48, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep. It could use a nice rewrite, but not flat-out deletion. Dylanlip (talk) 13:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
Keep but don't protect this is probably too notable to leave deleted. (Having notable topics blank annoys causal readers, and makes it hard to find related articles.) It will only come back worse. This looks like a job for Imperial Colonization. --Mn-z 17:18, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
A wizard did it 
Abstain. While the article is shit, I think if someone would remove the true junk and polish what's left a little bit, there might be a semi-decent stub left. 
Obvious Keep. 
Delete. It's a one-line joke that's already been done a number of times but it's been fleshed out with a bundle of nothing. Redemption cometh in the form of a bulldozer. --
EPIC MEH.
Keep. It could use a steamroller, but not a full delete. It'll only come back even crappier than before. I personally suggest Colonization. 
Strong keep. I liked it. Dump the templates at the start, change it to an UnTweet or some other format, kill the section edits, fix the spelling, and it has some small promise. —The preceding 
Hell no.- 
Bless. It's making fun of metal. I personally don't believe in deleting templates unless they are absolutely horrible, and this isn't anywhere near horrible. In fact, it's actually pretty funny in context. --
