Uncyclopedia:VFH/archive9
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFH. |
UnBooks:Uncyclopedia for Dummies
Featured —rc (t) 07:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- SN+F It's spent a week sulking in piss, and it got a really good review. It almost made it through last time, but hell, it's worth another shot, and I think this is my best work yet. VOTE! --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 16:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, like last time--Shandon 18:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:41, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 23:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- 4. --L 03:46, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Funny, funny stuff.--<<>> 03:49, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thumbs up. Good, good, good. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 03:09, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Excellent. ~ 17:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hilarious 06:08, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Should definitely be featured.--Jsemmens 18:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Anders Forsbrand, again. -- Hindleyite Converse 19:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Front-Page-It-Baby! --Nerd42Talk 22:10, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sure this has been here before? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 22:17, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Very nicely done. I bet even n00bs'll get it. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Excellent! Feureau 00:11, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. OMG!!! This aerticel is teh BEST EVER!!!!! FairNokey von Preatelmier the Amazingly Invincible and Pwner of n00bs MUN SEXY UGOTG CUNT\m/ ^_^ \m/ DO YOU SPEAK-TALK?! 00:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. As before. I think its first nomination was a victim of apathy (or a purge).--Procopius 12:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:54, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. I think you have a Best of '07 going. Swordmaster 22:24, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against. InfiniteMonkey 18:40, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
HowTo:Run away from home
Featured —rc (t) 07:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and for --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 03:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For the nostalgia - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 08:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- For making me tidy my room!!! BerogenVFH 13:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- 4. --L 15:33, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Pretty funny. --76.171.188.74 00:01, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Kinda Cute! --DAME :: FoxyBabe :: TALK 16:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. 15Mickey20 20:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:34, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- I hope my children read this. FOR Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, the list of equipment got me laughing.--Nydas 18:02, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Nobody understands me! I hate you all!! --ynnaD 12:10, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Very for. My vote is worth a trillion - frontpage now =P --insanesparrow 11:03, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 01:17, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Self-for --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- for -- 16:15, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- For WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 20:58, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Blackbeard Catering Company
Featured —rc (t) 07:54, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and Fuh-fuh-for. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:17, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Self-arrr! Sixteen men on a deadman's chest, wit' a charmin' centerpiece o' carnations.--Procopius 13:58, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Against doesn't make me hungry for more.Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, if it wasn't for the rickets, beriberi and buggery I'd totally be a pirate.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:47, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- ARRR!!! I mean For.InfiniteMonkey 05:30, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, I love it.--Nydas 19:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Forrrrrr --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- 01:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 17:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Great work --ynnaD 17:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- for. oh yes - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:56, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 00:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. One of the best articles I've read in a long time. 15Mickey20 22:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Really great stuff. --Anyone 18:20, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - I read this a while ago and it's still great. —Braydie at 01:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For You're off the edge of the map, mate; here there be DINERS!!! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 02:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- Pirate-Style Approval Given. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 19:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
Really Big Tree
Featured —rc (t) 07:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nom & For: I came across it while working on my PLS entry rewrite of rainforest, and I liked it. So I did some clean-up on it, and now I think it's ready. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Funniest article ever. Funnier than the entire uncyclopedia on end. -- 23:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- weak against. Sorry dude it's real funny and has great potential it's just a little too unorganzied clean it up a bit and I'll be happy to vote For it.--Gaberou 23:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- For: One of the few articles that made me laugh out loud.--85.224.80.23 23:15, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- 23:37, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:50, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Against I've read this article several times trying to find what makes it so great - I don't see it. Sorry. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:43, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against Er... what? The Humbled Master 02:49, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong for. I think I meant to nominate this one myself before. Just fucking makes me laugh. Agree that it could use some trimming though. --So So 02:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Skates the fine line between genius and insanity, trips, then falls in the toilet.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:59, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 05:23, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For. I assume that a weak against is -0.5. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 13:29, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Impressive how so much material can be written on such a silly subject. --Composure1 18:01, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Zyrac 19:31, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:11, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - I've been meaning to vote for this before now. —Braydie at 01:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Really Big For At first, I was like "wtf?" Then I got it: it's a really big fucking tree. I never saw it coming. --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 16:35, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For...I don't know why, I don't know how, but it sort of grows on you--Shandon 18:57, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For There MUST be like 13,167 squirrels in that tree.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 23:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For I rarely vote, but this has been one of my favorite surrealist articles for a long time now. Glad to see the light dusting this has given it. 01/29 23:33
- For And I think I'll record my voice for this one. -- 00:27, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- For (I Approve) Should be a mention about what it would be like to fall out of the Big Tree. Maybe mentioning the Antigravity Cat's or something but I like --Naimrod 21:06, 29 January 2007 (EST)
- For "Nice Mullet Asshole!" [[user:Weasel3689}} 23:05 30 January 2007 (PST)
HowTo:Hold a Handbag Like a Man
Featured —rc (t) 06:18, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- N+F. Simple, accessible and LOL - David Gerard 00:50, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - I can't really say no to things I've contributed to - It's gneomI 04:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 07:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against I usually love HowTo's, but this one just isn't doing it for me. --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 17:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- sure - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. I'm the opposite of Diz. His doppleuser, if you will.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:42, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- For hilarious -- 02:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message, 02:45, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Short, and almost too similar to HowTo:Convince People You're a Heterosexual Male, but survives on a few clever lines. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. I think the tone, style and pretended audience are entirely different, but I would. BerogenVFH 13:21, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- My husband says Yes Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- For For - The Mary Tyler Moore stuff made me laugh very hard. Great. --FoxyBabe 19:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. The picture of the men who failed to take the advice sealed it. 15Mickey20 20:16, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:24, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- For It is short, could be expanded, but as it is it is excellently done --DreamyBoat 08:25, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- For It is very funny. I'm so coming out hetero!
--Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH 10:40, 23 Jan 2007 (Mountain Time)
- For —Braydie at 01:20, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Up it goes! The Humbled Master 19:55, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Witless Protection Program, NOW WITH AUDIO!!
Featured —rc (t) 07:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For. Why hasn't this been featured yet? Funny article. 19:24, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- For The crows part alone is hysterical. -- 20:16, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Although, it could use a bit of an expansion. -- 23:43, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For. THIS NEEDS TO BE FEATURED. I'm sick of seeing it Quasified. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 04:03, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 08:33, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch 11:08, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- 4 "Wash. Biol. Surv." 'Nuff said. ••••• I my cat! 11:14, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 15:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - I really like it. I agree, it needs expansion.--FoxyBabe 19:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. I have always loved this article.--<<>> 14:14, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:57, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Great idea. Needs expansion. Ethereal 05:33, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:06, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against Sorry. you could get so much more out of the idea. good but needs more content - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- For CAW! CAW! The Humbled Master 00:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- weak for I'm kinda swaying towards Jack's comment. It could be a lot longer, but from what's there, it's funny. —Braydie at 01:22, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Little Orphan Annie
Featured —rc (t) 06:16, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- 4. --L 12:38, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- I assume N as well - David Gerard 12:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For though I kept wanting to make the eyes in the photos blank white circles as well - David Gerard 12:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Originally I did try 'chops with the cartoon eyes, but they managed to look less creepy.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:42, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Have you ever had a line stuck in your head so irritating that you ended up rewriting Annie just to get it out? No? Oh, maybe it's just me, then.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 14:36, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For My sister was some obscure orphan in a play adaptation of it. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong for. Strong contender for article of the month (if we've actually created that).--Procopius 16:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 18:53, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For AAAAAIIIIIEEEEEEEEIIIAAAAAAAIIIIIIIEEEEEEEEIIIIIIIAAAAAAAUUUUUUUUUGGGGGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!! The Humbled Master 21:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Very cool. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:55, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For--Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 02:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 06:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:15, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 20:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Wow... Just... Wow. Swordmaster 21:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Just a solid article. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:34, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against, I hate musicals. --HP FP talk 17:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- IAN WELLER-- TALK -- F@H -- VFH -- VFD -- RAND 22:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- For and Comment " ^^ Jesus Hyram Christ! What the hell was that? ^^ " BerogenVFH 14:09, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against:I don't get it and i don't know what it's aboutJamesryanjcrjcr
- 1934 Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:26, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
AAA
Featured —rc (t) 06:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and for. I can't believe no one's said anything about this article before.--Andorin Kato 04:23, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against. I'm less amused than last time this got nom'd, when I was at least quasi-amused. Now it's got a giant list, woohoo?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Although FUK or ASS would be funnier, but I still like it. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 10:27, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against We've been here before. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:01, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- FOR - One of my favorite pages. --User:Nintendorulez 21:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- 444 --GAMESPOT=666 03:17, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Affection-tainted self-for. Still needs more comedy linking and footnotes,[1] though. --L 03:58, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 04:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For again - I really like the concept of this. I hope the new VFH system can help this get through. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 09:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Still no.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 18:54, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- This guy is so good at Pinball. For.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:35, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - Hooray! I'm in an article! --AAA! (AAAA) 03:55, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against. - Lemon. 21:21, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - This is great! Hpesoj 18:22, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against--192.173.4.92 15:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- I think we've been through this already (for). Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Hope I got the count right; I assume it's (number for) - (number against) = current tally. Not sure about GAMESPOT=666's vote. --Redmond 03:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message, 03:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- FOR - Nelson340 22:51, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- for because i said for last time and i'm trying to be consistant - jack mort | cunt | talk - 16:26, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- For--J. Fuckin Kyle
(talk) 20:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - Zaui ⌘ TALK MUN ╬ - 20:11, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For' because only AAA can get Sonic and Tails--Soma 21:55, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - Don't know what happened before, but this is really funny. It's gneomI 06:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Forgasm.--Emmzee 16:18, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - Retrofuture42 17:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 20:32, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - I don't want to be left out. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:25, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - This is fucking hilarious!--Shas 03:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - I like it, but its very similar to Anonymous.--Shas 03:46, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Funny. goshzillacorrespondence 01:45, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- "For" —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nachoman123 (talk • contribs) diff
- For. Great to see this is gonna be featured, finally. Preferred that list to be a bit shorter, but meh, it's still funny. -- Hindleyite Converse 19:07, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- For the article, but against this person who effortlessly beats my score on Centipede. --Ж WHEEEEE! 17:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- 00100. '011100.10101.01100.01100 11001.10000.10010.00100. ~ Unflameviper Who's a Peach? 21:50, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Let me tell you a secret (im AAA) Weasel 3689 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- For that article is so damn good I decided to translate it to spanish so more people can be able to read it =) --200.56.160.14 04:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Me
Featured —rc (t) 07:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Self-nom and
virulently againsterr, for. Saved from the depths of category:rewrite.--Sultanofsurreal 04:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC) - AGH MY EYES and For - David Gerard 16:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. This has not been done before. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against Great idea, really, but doesn't execute. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:08, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. I like this one a lot. - Lemon. 00:30, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For This rewrite actually made Me good. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 04:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. This actually would be an awesome reskin.--Ginchael 18:11, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Remembers me that song: "You're pitiful, you're pitiful and screwed". -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 18:38, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For--Prolix 03:16, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Wanna sechs?????!?!??! --Jchillerup 13:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak against. --L 13:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)[citation needed] 01:47, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:35, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 14:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. 15Mickey20 12:31, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Of course, if we feature this, we should probably do a reskin. -- 11:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 06:33, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For I'm loving the br>. —Braydie at 19:29, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - I've seen this before. Too bad I didn't think of nominating it. Oh well. Here's my vote. -- The Llama Llover!!! 03:44, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Hooray for ME! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 08:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Onomatopoeia
Featured —rc (t) 07:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For - This is good, I like the way that it is a narration. —Braydie at 08:59, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - I like it also --Atomic 11:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Tibiti tibiti ta! -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 15:31, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For However, I think it should also include a "fap fap fap" in order for it to be complete. -- 15:41, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For MEONG! MEONG! MEONG!--Rwg • Talk • 17:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:23, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- 4 (This article was rescued from deletion. To quote VFD, "Keep and Feature") --Alksub 06:30, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Very good use of fonts. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message, 12:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- FOR 4 four fore. See: [1]
I WAS HERE-kjhf!- 15:34, 31 December 2006 (UTC) - Fork. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 15:35, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Foooooooooooooooooooromp. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 09:35, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm for it. I'm for it so much it's not even funny. -- The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.56.180.60 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits )
- Tap Tap Tap F-o-r--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against The joke really is obvious and not really particularly funny. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 18:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Bam! --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:23, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Biif! Pow! Whammo! For! --Redmond 19:10, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- no, almost - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:52, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- BATTA BING! BATTA BEAN! BATTA BIM-BAM-BOOM! For!--Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 02:49, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Smack!--FoxyBabe 19:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - feature this already! -- The Llama Llover!!! 00:49, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- For POWAAAHHH! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 08:51, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Limitations of Superpowers as Applies to God
Featured —rc (t) 06:15, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- N+F. It's funny because it's true. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 08:12, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - Sir Xiao Li CUN VFH NS (Talk)[citation needed] 08:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - More good stuff from One-eyed Jack. -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:20, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For because God wills it as so. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, and it's all there in the Marvel Handbook.--Procopius 18:33, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For OEJ is God. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:30, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For OEJ strikes gold again. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Sidney Trammell and the Church of God the Wholly Incompetent support you in your endeavour! The Humbled Master 02:45, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
*4. --130.102.0.177 That was me; see below. --L
- For Whoops, forgot to log in... --L 06:49, 5 January 2007 (UTC) 06:46, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:32, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message, 03:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. 15Mickey20 12:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak For Good, long-winded/repeats itself - jack mort | cunt | talk - 16:43, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah. Excellent satire. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 23:32, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- I see HumbledMaster and PrettiestPretty and others have added stuff. Nice job, you chaps.----OEJ 23:29, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, goddamnit.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:17, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
Victorian Era
Featured - um, guys, you around? I really don't want this job ... - David Gerard 14:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and for. I came across this at pee review and just couldn't help but nominate it.--<<>> 14:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Orphans. Heh.--Procopius 15:16, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- For pointing out that she was hot. BerogenVFH 15:26, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- For my own article, because if the Victorian Era didn't rock, it certainly polka'd. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:09, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- One up! --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:41, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. "Pop, one day can I be an orphan?" "One day, son. One day..."--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:10, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:57, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- 4. --L 03:30, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 05:06, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Ah, the good old days... The Humbled Master 06:58, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- For 203.164.179.198 13:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:28, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:07, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- 01:27, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Pressed Flowers, great hobby.--FoxyBabe 19:08, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For How in the hell did I miss this? -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For I finally got around to reading this, and I certainly approve. And I like it better than "Wicker Man" and with this vote I think this will now get featured first, hehe. --Composure1 04:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- *cough* - David Gerard 08:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah that Wicker Man sure did suck. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 18:09, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Tonight! It'll be tonight! - David Gerard 08:02, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
The Wicker Man
Featured - RC and Brad were both AWOL, so I did it 'cos they feel sorta not-so-fresh after two days now. I don't think I fucked anything up. I featured this instead of the Victorian one because this is the one that should have gone up for the 10th - David Gerard 01:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Re-Nom and For. An article that has had a long life on VFH, and deserves another shot at the blue ribbon.--<<>> 15:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For the love of god, let 'em have it or Mhaille will haunt us to our graves! -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 15:57, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- I give up! For. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 16:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 16:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For nice. --Sir Zombiebaron 18:05, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 18:09, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Megafor It is nothing short of a heinous crime that this hasn't been featured. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:28, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 04:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Who else could vote for this article? Edward Woodward could. And should. The Humbled Master 06:19, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Phore Eigh lieks anned uhprooves uv thiss artickle. Sliferjam ~ This is my new signature. Cool huh? 19:10, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message, 09:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:52, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- FOR THE LOVE OF WICKER YES! - jack mort | cunt | talk - 02:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Bees! I mean For BerogenVFH 01:52, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- For for mentioning bees. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 20:51, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
UnBooks:The 7 Habits of Highly Effective Drifters
Featured —rc (t) 06:06, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Re-Nom and For. Another article I had to take off of VFH that I thought deserved to be featured.--<<>> 01:24, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 03:13, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Superfor -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:28, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Nearly made me spill my drink. The Humbled Master 03:34, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Thanks Brad, saved me from having to do it myself. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 13:05, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- 4. --L 13:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 08:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:34, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - funny and pretty damn clever as well.--Nydas 19:06, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Stan Lather 22:00, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Andorin Kato 04:35, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. BerogenVFH 01:50, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- For--Winstanley1 22:27, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
My Journeys with the GPS (now with sound!)
Featured —rc (t) 03:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nomination and Affirmative I saw this on Pee Review and found it flawless. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:36, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hell yes - David Gerard 11:14, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For--Shandon 17:02, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Is it too late to ask for one for Christmas?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Great article. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 20:49, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - Excellent - Zaui ⌘ TALK MUN ╬ - 22:30, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- 4. --L 05:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 06:31, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For I think I'll record my voice for this article. -- 06:45, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Many thanks to MO for the pics and to David Gerard for saving me from shame...-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 09:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 18:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 23:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- For I just came back from a road trip; the GPS was useless indeed. --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 16:30, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 15:49, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
Alexander the Great
Featured —rc (t) 06:49, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For Yet another great article by ENeGMA. It definitely made me laugh. I plan on recording my voice talent to the article as well. -- 04:55, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- ForProlix 05:08, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, 'tis a funny article. --The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 07:54, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- For It was all very off the cuff, but I was reasonably happy with the results. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 18:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- For' --~ 22:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Just for, dammit. BerogenVFH 20:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 21:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against --User:Toad/Toad 2:55, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message 01:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 01:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. AND there's still room for expansion too! -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 20:14, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- for. but needs expansion - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. -- Hindleyite Converse 15:51, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:15, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- I thought I had already voted for this. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 04:43, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For It's cool. --Alksub - {talk} 09:07, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 19:17, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --User:Nintendorulez 22:39, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Just to get it off the page. Up it goes! The Humbled Master 07:10, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Third Epistle to the Thessalonians
Featured —rc (t) 06:16, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Re-Nom and For. So great it got mentioned in Wikipedia. No really, look at the Apocraphy section.--<<>> 04:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Refor As before, brilliant. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:49, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 04:52, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, nobody warned me, but this new and improved VFH has the unfortunate side-effect of giving me deja vu. And man-boobs.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For It's official, guys; 3 Thessalonians is mentioned on Wikipedia under New Testament apocrypha. Also, you might want to check out the companion piece to 3 Thessalonians, UnBooks:Third Epistle to the Thessalonians, if you wish for more of grouchy St. Paul. Oh, and, everyone, HAPPY NEW YEAR! The Humbled Master 06:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For--Shandon 11:51, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Heck, now I might renom Erraticus.--Procopius 14:06, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Very good. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:44, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Again. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 18:09, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For.--Ginchael 18:14, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Pretentiously delegating my knowledge (none thereof) toward this particular type of Christian ecclesiastical humour. Great number of little anecdotes; understood them. --AmericanBastard 22:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 00:25, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Huh. This article got more votes in a day than it did in a week-plus. Well, keep 'em coming, now.--Procopius 00:43, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Oh, Thessalonians, you who have fallen so low! Did I not tell you to VOTE FOR THIS ARTICLE?!?! The Humbled Master 01:20, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 03:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:46, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Feature it already! --Composure1 04:40, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For but I really think that Third Text Message to the Thessalonians was more concise. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:36, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Stan Lather 21:59, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
HowTo:Convince People You're a Heterosexual Male
Featured —rc (t) 05:58, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For - David Gerard 23:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Faaabulous! This is fantastic, top to bottom. - Lemon. 23:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- For So that's how it's done. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:27, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak against It's a good article but I'm not sure it's feature worthy. --GAMESPOT=666 16:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, scratch, belch! Dat's good shit right der.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:50, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against, naaah, it's not that funny. Feureau 20:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Abstain. Honestly, I really don't understand what the article is supposed to satirialize. I mean, all men are straight, so where's the need to pretend to be straight ? Shees! -- di Mario 20:30, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Looks like I'll have to quit my job writing dildo manuals..... (Forgot to sign again -_-) --Forgottenpassword 22:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For You need all the colours for a rainbow, sugar. BerogenVFH 20:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. All together now: Somewhere-ee-eere ooo-ver the rainbow... 23:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - I'm gonna need this article after doing this. ••••• I my cat! 13:43, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
*For Definitely a must read --Tom Cruise 19:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Not a user. --—Braydie 14:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- For That article was sooooooo straight.--Lt. Wyoming 16:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message 01:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Good article. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 17:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Lovely stuff. 15Mickey20 17:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 23:21, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For.--J. Fuckin Kyle
(talk) 19:00, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Ouch, my nail! -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 16:17, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:51, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Wow, this is amazing. Saved from Darwin removal (for now anyway) because this really needs to be featured.--<<>> 15:13, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 23:21, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- For -- 18:39, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, so the damn thing doesn't get Darwined...again.--Ginchael 21:03, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Cow Udders Caught in Barbed Wire
Featured —rc (t) 05:48, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Snom. Quasi-Featured before, but in Modern Society's laser-powered VFH capabilities I think it may just be featured yet. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. I have to agree about the lasers and stuff...oh yeah, and I think this should be featured too. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 06:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For LOL Let it be known to the world that uncyclopedians are animal S&Ms Feureau 20:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Owww. - David Gerard 21:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. --goshzillacorrespondence 05:16, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- For once moo-re. -- Hindleyite Converse 13:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --—Braydie 13:15, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message 01:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against Just didn't make me laugh. Normally I like silly articles like this, but I just couldn't get into it. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 17:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Two reasons: 1.) I like it. 2.) To end the VFH tyranny of ENeGMA. - Lemon. 23:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Haha. Poor cows... --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 22:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against. I just don't think it is funny. --J. Fuckin Kyle
(talk) 22:46, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 20:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- For That really hurts! --Rwg • Talk • Rwg 20:55, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- for For we all like big tits :p User:Xykon/sig 21:20, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- for Wacky--Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 22:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Nice! -- Sir Mafagafo (talk to me) 22:09, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Because I've done it before and I'll do it again. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:57, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Feature. Barbed wire on cow udders is the new punk. --UNKNOWNFILE 06:04, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For!For me a drink, matey. --Atomic 22:34, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For oookay activating warp drive system engine thingy, twisting format feild matter fabric, 5...4....3....atchooo....sorry, where was I? oh2....1....LAUNCH!!! LOL
- For --YnnaD 23:18, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against Votewhoring aside, I simply can not educe humor from this article. (Let it be known that I can be "persuaded" to change my vote) --~McDestroyertron (talk) 23:26, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, just like last time. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 04:56, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against. I still don't think this article is "all that". Sorry Squigs.--<<>> 15:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak For, Its not a pity vote, I did like some of it.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:50, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Ironing
Featured —rc (t) 07:56, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nomination & I Approve This Message 02:45, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - I have two reasons. Reason number one is I really do think ironing is fun and I like the pictures and the word sentences. Reason number two is because I love the person who wrote it and because I believe it was well written. --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 02:52, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - oh, heck, I rewrote it; I *have* to love it.--Shandon 02:53, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Poor Shandon, never wrote a Featured Article. I hope he's happy. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For This pleases me! -- Sir Mafagafo (talk to me) 03:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. I make my nonexistent girlfriend do it all the time. Maybe she can pick up some pointers, but I doubt it. Oh, good article too. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Never though that something as mundane as ironing could be turned into something like "OMGzzz!!! Xxxtreemeee IroNinG!!!!". Are steroids involved? User:Chocolate monster/sig
- For Excellent article. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:41, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Bizarre image placement aside the article had me reaching for my Phillips Elance Steam. For -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 19:03, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- FOR OF COURSE!!!!! see my awesome sig!! - The HRH MuCal. Tayor MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)
- For - Tayor: Mines better. —Braydie at 19:21, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - a bit random, but still great - David Gerard 19:26, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. This article is how I like my
womenarticles: meaty. BerogenVFH 19:34, 29 December 2006 (UTC) - For. You kids and your sports these days. Back in my day we'd fall down the stairs. Now that was a sport.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. .....Sig preparations, ICG.. check, FCR... check, SEX... very check....3...2....engines on....1...LIFTOFF!!!oneoneoneone
- For Curse you, Shandon...--Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. -- Hindleyite Converse 18:02, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For.--Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 18:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For DaBlade (Click here to bitch. :)) 04:37, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- For 04:50, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
IQ:Sample test
Featured —rc (t) 07:14, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nom and For - This has been around ages, and it's great. --—Braydie 19:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:47, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - Reminds me of the questions sections from Jon Stewart's America (The Book). -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 21:21, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For I am partial to articles with my images. --Sir Zombiebaron 00:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 00:29, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --GAMESPOT=666 02:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Easiest test I've ever taken. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:07, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Even though it bears more than a passing resemblance to MENSA Entrance Test. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:22, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. i had a good laugh when i first read it. it's full of facts and sometimes facts are funny. -- mowgli 15:44, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For -- Sir Mafagafo (talk to me) 23:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Why is it so? - David Gerard 23:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For -- 06:46, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Spell for without any context whatsoever and without looking how it's spelt in the question. -- Hindleyite Converse 18:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For--Shandon 18:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For!!!"" Powering up... injecting fluon coolant... rebuffing engine rings... live in 5... 4... 3... 2... 1... ENGAGE!!!oneoneone...one...zero
- FOR !! I'm a conformist!!! The HRH MuCal. Tayor MUN (Praise!) (CMC!)
- For. And you can have fries with that... -- 22:50, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For great justice I got a score of -5! --BaCaRuDa 23:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Don't make me break out my mensa card --YnnaD 23:01, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message, 23:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
First Gradeism
Featured —rc (t) 06:27, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nom and for. Courtesy of Squiggle; though I worked on it a little, he gets all the credit for the brilliant idea and doing the lion's share of the writing. --Sultanofsurreal 05:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, it reminds me of my own
terriblechildhood.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC) - For. Art is important.--EponymousBotch 09:12, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. The tex-tures. -- Hindleyite Converse 10:02, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 11:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Good. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:27, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Self For, though Sultanofsurreal deserves a lot of credit here than he's giving himself. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:32, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Maybe you two should share the award you get when an article you wrote is featured.
--Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:23, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For the "Tortured Geniuses" section is hilarious--Chompy 20:38, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Fine, I'll vote dammit -- Sir Mafagafo (talk to me) 22:06, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For- i liked it, it was funny, yeah.--Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 22:07, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For I can't draw that good... --71.235.167.171 22:59, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For--GAMESPOT=666 02:20, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 05:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. This authir is destined for greatness --di Mario 20:06, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- ForThis article is all kinds of awesome--Ganall 20:43, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message, 23:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For fifty four fours. --UNKNOWNFILE 06:03, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
Separation Issues
Featured —rc (t) 08:11, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Snom for now. - Ok, now to release it to the people. --—Braydie 12:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ok, For --—Braydie 19:35, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:52, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:43, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message 19:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Indeed. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 19:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
*For Awesome.
- 4: Total sweetness -Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH05:03, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Pretty good. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Very amusing.--J. Fuckin Kyle
(talk) 00:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- For I like it, and I cave in way too easily... --Rwg 16:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Go on then now where's my mince pie? --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 09:46, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- For mince pies? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 19:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- For--Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 22:03, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- For -- Sir Mafagafo (talk to me) 22:04, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- for it had me in stiches! Excellent art-work, plus the authors mentioned the word 'drunk' twice. This is always a big hit for me! ------- !!!!di Mario 00:08, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Charles Manson. 'Nuff said. --Sir Zombiebaron 00:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
Poof, There It Is Theory
Featured —rc (t) 07:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nom and For - got me giggling - David Gerard 18:02, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, Yes Yes, I'm gonna vote for it.--The One and Only Czar Yah 01:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Well, you made one crazy teenaged Michiganian laugh. Isn't that what really matters? --DarthMichigan- ダアスミシガン 21:33, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. And I cleaned it up a bit. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --The Acceptable Cainad (Fnord) 08:06, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For As a scientist, I can only stare open-mouthed at the brilliance of this theory and make sounds in the order of guhh. Or perhaps the open mouth is just the result of one fermented onion juice too many. -- di Mario 19:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- FOR Yes! Friggin' yeah! . . . though it sounds abit supportive towards intelligent design... Feureau 20:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against. 'Poof' is a funny word, but this isn't doing it for me.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:15, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Just For taking the best-ever pop at Hubbard.BerogenVFH 20:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Strong for. Terrific.--Procopius 14:51, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Poof, there's my vote! -- 22:03, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message 01:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 03:33, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. One of the most logical scientific poofs I've ever read.--<<>> 20:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- FOR, very good indeed - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:23, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- For I liked it when I made its picture thing. --Sir Zombiebaron 22:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Conceptual Art
Featured —rc (t) 07:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
- SNF--Winstanley1 12:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Woohoohoo. Reminds me of art history class. -- 22:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- For- I like it 07:54, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 14:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message 01:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, and Winstanley1 is way underrated as a writer. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- 4. --L 11:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, but feel free to muck with that formatting I added. -- Hindleyite Converse 13:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- For I'm a sucker for this kind of humor. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:38, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- For ----Fooloolo 01:37, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Ok, you got me to laugh, so take your slimy for!--<<>> 20:02, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- For- I like art! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 05:49, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Life's Answerable Questions
Featured —rc (t) 07:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nomination and for At last, an article answering all the questions to which we already know the answers...! --Zig 15:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Yes, it is a reply article, but very original and funny (?) if you'll give it a chance. --User:The Bard/sig 18:33, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. More. --goshzillacorrespondence 23:31, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. 'Tis good. 'Tis very good. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:06, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. What did the trick was: "...exiled and spooning with the dog on the back porch..."-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 08:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment. Then you may wish to withdraw your vote, because I quoted that sentence (and the one that follows it) as a tip of the hat to this article. If that's too dodgy, I'd gladly scrap that section altogether. --User:The Bard/sig 11:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak for. --L 10:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. I enjoyed this muchly. Lemon. 20:49, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, even though it uses {{USERNAME}}. And because I'm chuffed someone wrote a reply to my article. Good stuff. -- Hindleyite Converse 21:05, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- For It's a good article, and we've had Life's Unanswerable Questions. --GAMESPOT=666 22:18, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- ...which didn't do it for me either. against --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- meh So far, life hasn't been able to answerify any of my questions. Ok, I understand birth, death, and taxes in between, but what is the friggin point ? -- di Mario 20:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Verr nice. Xsine 20:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. I'm officially impressed.--Procopius 14:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Way For Sweeet. --Jives 16:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, 23:23, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak for Despite being highly derivative, I found it amusing. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 18:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 03:34, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
Christmas Number Ones
Featured, merry Yarmulklaus —rc (t) 05:49, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nomination and For. I am more than happy for this to be featured, because as usual for a Hardwick article, it's really funny. That is as long as it doesn't beat Commercial Conformity Period to Christmas Day featurage. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:21, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 14:51, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Really Strong Freakin' For Oh my God is this good... -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Damn Christmas cheer! I'm full of it! Christmas cheer, I mean.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:10, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes--GAMESPOT=666 05:03, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Let's help this one on its slow, grim, struggle to the top. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 14:33, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- for no, yuo chat 15:09, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message 01:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 07:03, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Brilliant. 15Mickey20 17:36, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Retrofuture42 11:01, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Against I'm just feeling the usual Hardwick magic with this one. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:54, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- For The Kraftwerk section is ace. --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 16:49, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Weatherman1126 21:17, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- For.--J. Fuckin Kyle
(talk) 23:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
Commercial Conformity Period
Featured —rc (t) 04:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nomination, for - Nicely expresses some of the thoughts I have on the holiday, though may be a little too British. Maybe there can be international things added.—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 14:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Isn't it still on Pee Review? I really like it, I just don't think it's finished yet. --* 21:24, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Roight, that'll be a for, then. :) -- 19:37, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Pretty much done now, I added some more stuff. -- Hindleyite Converse 14:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- I am strangely compelled to vote For this. Nice one. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 11:27, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. And that wouldn't be because of my message further up the page, would it? :) -- Hindleyite Converse 11:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --—Braydie 13:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 14:58, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. I've been spamming links to this EVERYWHERE...--<<>> 15:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 15:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- For -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 19:36, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I Approve This Message 01:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Alright, hindleyite, here ya go. :-x --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Greetings frum ED. Sheneequa 13:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC) 13:21, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- For I refrain from voting a lot in order to keep my sig alive, but this is just such a good analogy, maybe not necessariraly lol funny but that kind of intellectual satire that is so satis- OK I'll go now... Sig launch in 3...2...1... Sir NeoZidane • CUN • talk
- For. XD -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 15:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. 15Mickey20 16:24, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
New Cooler Edition
Featured —rc (t) 06:57, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nom and For. I believe this can get even better than it is now, but it's awesome enough for feature right now.--<<>> 15:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --—Braydie 15:01, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- For I agree with Brad. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 16:41, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- FOR How much cooler can you get? I need this translation! -Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH 21:38, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, ^_^ 21:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Jesus wept with laughter when he read this! Rad 02:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Cause I helped write it, with hopefully more to come --Jobot37 05:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- For, of course. -- ♥ Lacey • clicky 06:44, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- For - with just a little qualification: the paragraphs are too lenghthy, better divide in subsections. -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 00:13, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- For Supérbe! -- di Mario 17:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Perfectly captures "youth" Bibles and their cluelessness/condescension toward the young.--Procopius 14:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- For per Procopius. My "friend" in Georgia once took me to a youth church meeting, despite my grumblings. It came spookily close to how this is. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- For--J. Fuckin Kyle (talk) 16:34, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Uncle J 12:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Garfield
Featured —rc (t) 09:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- SNF - PooLit honorable mention; was also previously nominated and came close to being featured but didn't quite make it. Also, people have added stuff since then.—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 10:52, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Still love it.--Procopius 14:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. The strips rule. -- Hindleyite Converse 16:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Really funny!--Jives 20:48, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Plus one!!!1 --Alksub 04:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Do it. --Toad 0249:10, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. - It's really just the pictures that make it funny especially the last one with the real cat but it's hilarious!--Gaberou 16:20, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For-Funny stuff--6969 23:47, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- For-Pretty funny, i'm impressed -- Uncle J 01:49, 21 December 2006
- Weak for The history part is kinda random and not as funny as the rest, but fortunately the rest is great. Prolix 02:45, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- For "The comics" section is the best. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- weak for as per Prolix. no, yuo chat 15:14, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Wow, this has gotten a lot better (sure, the history part could probably be gone, but it's good enough as is, I say! GOOD ENOUGH NOW!)--<<>> 18:29, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- For. Yet I could not read until the end (longer periods at the beggining, please). -- herr doktor needsAgear [scream!] 18:40, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- For- Yay Garfield, Me-Ow.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 23:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- I DISApprove This Message 01:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- YESSES Dumitru 01:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 06:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- ↑ Or endnotes. Whatever.