From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Not funny. Un-encyclopedic. Second person narrative. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:11, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Spıke Ѧ 10:19 24-Oct-13
- Borderline. See comments. • Puppy's talk page • 07:21 29 Oct 2013
- Delete. Ok, it actually is not that good, and the last comments convinced me. I liked the image part. Anton (talk) 15:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. No.--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:48, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
I like it. But it will do with more images. Anton (talk) 10:40, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- First read through put it on the borderline. Second read through and it's a weak attempt. Just not funny enough to warrant it's inclusion as a non-encyclopaedic article, and it doesn't quite fit into any other namespace. A decent rewrite and it could become a “HowTo:Borrow five bucks”, or maybe “UnScripts:That guy you once knew”. • Puppy's talk page • 07:21 29 Oct 2013
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Un-encyclopedic. Not funny. Boring. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:16, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Absurdly long anything is now a trite old joke. Using <math> to write 6 in the most complicated way possible, and then repeating it 22 times, is just self-congratulation. Ten initial quotations, four of them of the bickering-quotation variety, citing The Prisoner. A tiny bit of humor, repeated ad nauseam to avoid confusion. Spıke Ѧ 10:24 24-Oct-13
- Delete. removed the horrific <math> aspect, but still sucks. • Puppy's talk page • 11:54 24 Oct 2013
- Bad. Anton (talk) 11:25, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Reads like a list without the bullet points. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:44, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A gigantic article on a Japanese music genre, obviously created by Japanese who aren't good at English and don't realize this is a humor wiki, for the primary purpose of documenting and gathering interest to the subject. Spıke Ѧ 14:10 25-Oct-13
- Delete. Awful. Heavy use of Capitalism: in grammar THERE which adds an un-encyclopedic nature. Also it is not funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:17, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. It reads better in the original Russian. • Puppy's talk page • 07:48 29 Oct 2013
- Delete. "Musical Phagocterstics". Say No More! --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:45, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't vote to delete until I've read the whole thing, and this was a very long and unhumorous read. I checked the Wikipedia article, and a good portion of the article is sporked, except where it concerns individual bands. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:27, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Until today, there were a large number of links to YouTube, and footnotes, including one referenced from all over that read, "Saddly, this is True." That (spelling, syntax, and lack of humor) are all the problems summed up. Spıke Ѧ 14:13 25-Oct-13
|
Score: 6 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Rather old and has not been improved on since several months ago. There is some concept but this is probably the same one as of HowTo:Write An Article That Stands No Chance Of Featuring On Uncyclopedia and maybe HowTo:Write an average Uncyclopedia article, but with the worse prose, less worked out structure and a title that is not justified (the author does not even talk about writing HowTos, he comes back to it but is still always off-topic). For those who may say that it still has some humour, I provided the above two links: these two articles serve for the same purpose but are funnier. Anton (talk) 19:24, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The author is the nominator. The article is a cheap imitation. Spıke Ѧ 19:54 31-Oct-13
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 12:08, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Author request. • Puppy's talk page • 12:37 01 Nov 2013
- Delete. Ditto. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:51, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Sorry but this says all. No humour. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- ScottPat reviewed it a while ago and I apologize to him for making his efforts pointless, but the author himself did not take these comments into account. Anton (talk) 19:22, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
- I don't think this is a deleteable article based upon merit, but I support the author's right to request deletion. I'd recommend that it be added to QVFD rather than putting it to the vote, if that's what the author wants. If it were mine, and I didn't feel it had enough merit to survive, I'd be inclined to move it to my user space though. • Puppy's talk page • 11:21 01 Nov 2013
- I did not think I could QVFD it, especially because of Scott's review. And what I move to my user space, is something I would like to keep. Anton (talk) 11:26, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
- I think it's worth keeping. Far better than Worst 100 Ways To Be Castrated or Carebear, which are two of my earliest attempts. But in respect of your right to delete your own work - and only because of that - I will vote to delete. • Puppy's talk page • 12:37 01 Nov 2013
- Thanks. Anton (talk) 13:13, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- A mixture of in-jokes. Grue, Cajek, trite jokes about Japan and bad prose, stolen from another article (The "No Gaijin Allowed"'s of Japan). Anton (talk)
- Navelism. An archetypal in-joke, a parody of a niche article on a parody website. Target audience might be 3 people, none of whom are still here. Spıke Ѧ 18:21 31-Oct-13
- Sorry for not putting it the right way. It is just that I used the tag system and the article got placed here automatically. Anton (talk) 19:16, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
- Nativitism. • Puppy's talk page • 10:23 01 Nov 2013
- Redundo. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:50, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
- It can go. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:31, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Awful, not funny, random. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:45, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir will add his vote here, my good man. • Puppy's talk page • 10:49 22 Oct 2013
- Paid by page count. Author makes it clear from the start that he has nothing to say, and that that will not stop him. Spıke Ѧ 11:46 22-Oct-13
- Delete. Anton (talk) 09:06, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Concur. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:06, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Last one of the mashed up wizards doing it. • Puppy's talk page • 12:45 28 Oct 2013
- Navelism. Uncyclopedians basing articles not on real-world "encyclopedia" reality but on other Uncyclopedia articles are writing to themselves and showing contempt for our readers. Spıke Ѧ 12:58 28-Oct-13
- This joke stopped being funny the moment someone decided to create 500 articles on it ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:40, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
- The image is worth keeping, though. Anton (talk) 15:25, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This is too far off the topic of the original in-joke. Therefore not funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:31, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Bastard newt. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:40, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Each in-joke has its bastard children, and they, together, create a mosaic of the overall in-joke. And if you took this one out mnnbvvccxz would have your throat in his hands and apply the pressure. I was never into the Newt in-joke, but some people are. Aleister 28-10
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Wilford Brimley is one of the minor memes on the website, and this article is for people who wanted him to be a religion — without doing the least to cleverly show how the real Brimley might resemble a religion. Even the "Holy Document" in the style of Brimley himself swings-and-misses at comedy. Spıke Ѧ 10:27 21-Oct-13
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:08, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Can't survive as is. If someone had the energy to rework some of the better material into Wilford Brimley we might be able to salvage some of it, but not enough to survive as a page on it's own. Wilford Brimley is better, but still short of being good. • Puppy's talk page • 09:00 22 Oct 2013
- Delete.Unnecessary spawn of a not too interesting original. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:29, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. For Spike and country. Aleister 2-11-'13
- Benson! Hey! Since when do we have religious tolerance in Uncyclopedia? There's only one god here and it stays that way! --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 11:41, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. This doesn't seem to be that bad, but it may need some improvement or salvaging. When it gets
improved deleted, it can be moved or redirected back to Wilford Brimley. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 12:47, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- No, it can't; there is already an article at Wilford Brimley. Spıke Ѧ 13:06 21-Oct-13
|
Comments |
- Comment. Did Aleister really vote to delete an article or am I hallucinating from the vast quantity of milk I drank last night? --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:54, November 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Milk??? Yech. Was it mother's milk, or from a goat, or a salamander? Makes a big difference in the taste and texture of the proteins. I used to drink milk, and then switched to chocolate milk, and then switched to pepsi cola, and then to water and juice. Chocolate milk did rock though, and milk shakes. Ummmmmm milk shakes (especially butterscotch milkshakes/malts). Aleister awhile later
- Comment. Okay, this has gone to +5. Don't you think it's appropriate to be deleted now? --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 16:00, November 5, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Found on Template:Nuclear, which Mimo and I have been working on. A tiny etude of Japanese stereotypes. Page title is the punch line and no one will look it up. Spıke Ѧ 16:49 3-Nov-13
- Delete. Would be good if the article talked about scoring "Home Runs" if a nuclear strike was launched but instead it talks in gibberish. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 05:40, November 4, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- I actually thought it was a good example of random funny, but too heavy on the Japanese memes. Cut it down slightly, added link to another page, and think it's a keepable stub. • Puppy's talk page • 07:46 04 Nov 2013
- As long as Puppy has volunteered to add writing to the page, code it so we can actually see the guy hit the ball and then it explodes as a nuclear weapon on the computer screen, and put in that surroundsmell coding he keeps threatening to invent, Keep.. Aleister 4-11
|
Comments |
- Are both Keep votes conditional on work getting done? Is work getting done? Spıke Ѧ 11:33 5-Nov-13
- Mine isn't. It's based on the small amount of work I have done, and the potential for more. I'm still cooking more ideas that I may add here later, but my overall feeling is that it is keep able as it is, even if it is short, and definitely has potential to be better. • Puppy's talk page • 12:09 05 Nov 2013
- OK, I added more. Do the two of you want to pump it up to feature status, or should we leave it. I really would like to see the explosion worked out in computer code and activated by the reader themselves. Puppy should be able to whip that up in time for dinner. Aleister 5-11 (9-11's cheap date)
- You ought to do more. That last round was mostly Japanese stereotypes, though done cleverly. And the page title is still the punch line. Spıke Ѧ 23:34 5-Nov-13
|
Score: 6 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Another silly imitation of My sojourn articles, in addition to this, something you will never understand if you don't know that it belongs to My sojourn category. Anton (talk) 13:49, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. A pointless imitation of part of AAAAAAAA! by Kip the Dip. Spıke Ѧ 14:02 7-Nov-13
- AAAAAAA! AAAA AA AAAAA AAA AAAAAA AAAA AAAAA. AAA 16:22, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Needs more AAA. And why is this in Category:My sojourn? And why do we have an AAAAAAAAA! category? And who are you people? --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 19:43, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
- It imitates the structure of My sojourn articles and AAAAA!: That time I was nearly raped -> AAAA AAAA A AAA AAAAAA AAAAA, etc. And the image which comes from That time I was nearly raped by a yak during my sojourn in Canada. Anton (talk) 20:31, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
- And we're the nice people from the hospital come to give you your medication, so please stop biting me. • Puppy's talk page • 08:41 07 Nov 2013
- Delete. Every my sojourn article deleted is a great step forward for this wiki ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:09, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete, the line seems to be if it's a combination of two in-jokes if the page up for deletion is written poorly. Aleister 7-11
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Barely any content. Un-encyclopedic and not funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Barely any content — a list of quips and a reused illustration. Redirect to Half (see Comments below) and redirect the 2 key on the keyboard template as well. Spıke Ѧ 22:42 21-Oct-13
- Delete. Twice as crap as it could be. • Puppy's talk page • 08:57 22 Oct 2013
- Delete ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:19, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. A doodle rather than an article. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:38, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. Don't think it could be featured or anything of this kind, but contains some great jokes. I especially liked fake scientific bits, such as "2+2 approaches infinity for very large values of 2." Anton (talk) 11:22, November 1, 2013 (UTC)
- The ghost of Chronarion urged me to vote for this. Aleister today
|
Comments |
- Perhaps a necessary article waiting for a re-write? I can't think of any ideas though. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:38, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- It was created by Chronarion at the very start of Uncyclopedia in 2005. But it has nearly no content. It also has the identical illustration whose cleverness led me to vote Keep on Half when it was VFD'd last month. Spıke Ѧ 22:42 21-Oct-13
- Barely any content? It's an article about two! What more content could it possibly have? --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 17:17, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. I wasn't sure if I should nominate this. This intro itself is well written, but beyond that the article degenerates into meme driven humour and misogynistic rants. There are likely less quality articles out there, but this one also has the added disadvantage of being pro-abuse. This topic can be done better, but unless it ha been it shouldn't remain here. • Puppy's talk page • 02:32 03 Nov 2013
- Delete. Agreed. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:29, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. In contrast to Pup, I found the intro gassy and ranty as well. (Along with leading with the author's nonsense name, what does it mean to say Fuck You "vehemently"?) The serious talk of violence is as unfunny to me as it was funny-without-real-work to the author, and writing about penises is the time-old self-pleasuring of a kid writing about penises. Spıke Ѧ 17:27 3-Nov-13
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. If most of the misogynistic rants are removed (Well, the article is called HowTo:Beat your wife) and text is added to the last section, it'll be just fine. Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 10:28, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. A very good piece of satire, as the concept keeps escalating as the article goes on and on, but when we get to the last 1/3 of the page the techniques of beating your wife go higher into satire. Violence has it's place in satire, and I'm thinking in particular of a show I've only recently seen, the Eddie Andres show, he's a talk show host. Aleister 8-11
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Unfunny and random. Barely any content. Needs to be deleted and rewritten. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:58, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
- (no, srsly, look it up!) This must-have article fell into the hands, in 2005, of a writer who knew nothing about it, and concluded that it must be that nobody cares. Indeed, blow it up and start over. Spıke Ѧ 15:49 3-Nov-13
- Delete. Seems to have been written in a different era. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:34, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. We probably need an article on Tunisia, but not this one. • Puppy's talk page • 08:03 04 Nov 2013
- LOL Zinc Get it? Me neither. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:45, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Random, memish, not funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:18, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I looked up the number seven but the first sentence tells me I'm going to be reading about "the Garfish tribe of half-fish people." And the rest of the article is Wacky Religion. Spıke Ѧ 10:27 24-Oct-13
- Delete. Completely disagree with the above rationales. The wacky religion angle is a good way to work with a very limited topic. What kills this is lack of cohesive nonsense - random humour works best when there is an inherit illogical logic, like a Douglas Adams book. Add to that poor spelling, grammar, formatting, and lack of images. Something more like crossbow would work - this doesn't. • Puppy's talk page • 07:27 29 Oct 2013
- Delete. A big load of nonsense sitting on prime word estate (some day). --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:36, November 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. "Seven is evil" appears to be the sole joke of this article, and it isn't enough for it to survive. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:50, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. "A communist language originating in the country of reds," about which all we can say is that Scandinavian languages look funny as they are very foreign; also, lists. Spıke Ѧ 10:15 21-Oct-13
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:04, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Bad. • Puppy's talk page • 09:15 22 Oct 2013
- Delete. Newman, and how is Bork connected to Swedish Chief? Anton (talk) 13:57, November 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. And redirect to Swedish Chef, known from the Muppets, who is always saying "Bork, bork bork..." -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:48, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Don't want to worry about wiping this entirely, just maintaining this article. Maybe if the time this article is about to get deleted, maybe redirect it to Swedish Chef and explain a little of it there? Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 01:39, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Redirected. As the only Keep vote suggests a deletion outcome, it looks as though this should satisfy all 6 voters. Spıke Ѧ 00:02 9-Nov-13
|
Score: 7 • voting closed
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. Navelism, and really bad writing. • Puppy's talk page • 01:26 09 Nov 2013
- Delete. Unfunny and pointless except to memorialize the wiki wars, that is, to write about ourselves. Spıke Ѧ 14:48 9-Nov-13
- Delete. I can see that this is trying to talk about the Uncyclopedia battle and splitting of this Uncyclopedia. I also definitely agree with the above posts. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 15:19, November 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. But we should definitely keep Simsie's great anthem. Anton (talk) 16:06, November 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Who cares? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:21, November 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Userspace This article can't decide if it is a football derby or a rap battle. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 01:21, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 09:56, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- A copy of this was put on both sites, it was bad, but since our side had no anthem, I made up one. I suspect the other side has already gotten rid of their copy during Forest Fire Week. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 00:57, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Not original. The author honestly tries to name the Worst Creatures to Have Sex With. Anton (talk) 16:03, November 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Cruft • Puppy's talk page • 09:25 09 Nov 2013
- Delete. Anton doesn't mean "not original" in the sense of plagiarism. This is simply 100-odd unoriginal takes on bestiality, none of them well-developed, all of them relying on the glee of writing about sex to strangers and none of them able to engage the reader. Includes Bush, camper, and Jew: A laugh riot. Spıke Ѧ 00:28 10-Nov-13
- Delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 01:30, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 09:54, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Lists. Not original. 11:02, October 20, 2013 (UTC) Anton (talk)
- Delete. Might have been funny in 2005; see also Comments below. Spıke Ѧ 19:54 21-Oct-13
- Delete. Badder. • Puppy's talk page • 09:15 22 Oct 2013
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 21:14, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Begone! (to clean the slate of the 4's) Aleister Joey No-Thumbs Day in the Falklands.
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Wacky Wiki War! I deleted the dumb lists of memes, but that doesn't leave much. Intro tries to morph Wikipedia into a movie in the right way: by misusing actual Wikipedia catch-phrases. Unfortunately, it doesn't use them in a way that has any special meaning. That would be clever. It seems there are two sequels? Together, would they make one good article? Spıke Ѧ 11:44 20-Oct-13
- They would, if they existed. But the author just put links to non-existent articles on Wikipedia itself. Anton (talk) 13:33, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
- How helpful of him! Thanks for deleting them. Spıke Ѧ 13:43 20-Oct-13
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
Delete. We already have templates for each continent and it's also pretty confusing. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:37, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Useful until we come up with a template Final Solution. (See Comments.) Spıke Ѧ 14:30 11-Nov-13
- If we are going to start working on a new World template which will contain all the other continent templates (thus leading to the deletion of the current ones) there's no point for continuing this discussion so I'll strike my vote out. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:47, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. I removed the VFD template because it showed up on every page with {{World Countries}}. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:54, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
- When nominating a template for deletion, you must put {{VFD}} inside a <noinclude> to keep this from happening.
- Before he renounced the site, Bizzeebeever talked with me about structuring these national templates to have continent collections expand out at the user's request. Spıke Ѧ 13:59 11-Nov-13
- Part of nominator's problem is that Uzbekistan (nominated nearby) used both the World and Asia template, as well as Turkic, Former CIS, and random vanity template {{AoED}} on the "axis of evil-doers." Below, I move to delete the latter instead. Spıke Ѧ 14:25,14:46 11-Nov-13
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Another fictional-country (this time, universe) article formerly found on Template:Latin America; a merger of Randumbo, cuteness, and memes. Spıke Ѧ 22:16 1-Nov-13
- Delete. • Puppy's talk page • 08:19 03 Nov 2013
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 21:40, November 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I think this cat can safely be let out and never invited back in. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:53, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unless the title refers to an actual thing, which I can't confirm with a quick google search. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 22:47, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- For those interested in the history of this, it was previously voted kept 5-3 in March 2009. No real rationale except "there is a lot worse" • Puppy's talk page • 11:45 01 Nov 2013
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Ignoring list-cruft, fake game, memes, in-jokes, terrible prose, spelling, grammar, and 'chopping, this keeps referring to “Josh”, “Rebecca” and some other name that just makes the whole thing feel like a Ballarat teenagers masturbatory fantasy. Survived deletion before, but possibly due to a disagreement about the 20 nominations rule. Should not survive again. • Puppy's talk page • 07:20 05 Nov 2013
- Delete. Recipe for failure: Don't just write about a TV show. Don't just write about a single episode. Write about a fantasy video game you would have created to be enjoyed by viewers of that single episode. And write poorly (as listed by Puppy above). Spıke Ѧ 11:44 5-Nov-13
- Delete. Author here. Man it's been ages since I've been on this site! Go nuts guys, this article was basically made yeeeears ago when me and my friend huffed one too many kittens and thought random 'chopping of a retarded photo of my cousin along with silly writing was funny. Was funny while it lasted I guess but the article doesn't belong here. --EvilCecil4th (talk) 14:01, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.Kitty litter. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:49, November 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 22:34, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Side note: The talk page is a good example of an editor taking criticism poorly. • Puppy's talk page • 07:24 05 Nov 2013
- Also of the "Two wrongs make a right" style of argument. Spıke Ѧ 11:44 5-Nov-13
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. It might not look so bad but ,I can assure you, once you've read it, you'll realize that, other than mentioning his buddy, Pedro once, it has nothing to do with Napoleon Dynamite and needs to be deleted and rewritten. Deletion wouldn't probably be needed if it did have some stuff related to the homonymous character but it doesn't. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 18:19, November 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. "Peice [sic] of shit." Spıke Ѧ 12:55 10-Nov-13
- Weak. Never found the movie funny, so I may miss the humour here. • Puppy's talk page • 12:12 11 Nov 2013
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 22:51, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Starts bad and gets worse. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:44, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Once I did the considerable research to figure out that Napoleon Dynamite is a character portrayed by Jon Heder, and most of the photographs are of Heder and are not cyberbullying of some other pimply teenager, the fact that the humor doesn't relate as well as it could to the real world was a minor concern. Spıke Ѧ 19:31 6-Nov-13
- Isn't Uncyclopedia supposed to parody the corresponding (whenever possible) articles of Wikipedia? --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 19:51, November 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Vote for Pedro is the poor man's Save Ferris. • Puppy's talk page • 12:12 11 Nov 2013
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Bad imitation of Suddenly, 'coons which is also used for its advertisment. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 19:37, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. New Uncyclopedian gets his plagiarism deleted by a fallen-away Admin and takes his gripe to mainspace. Spıke Ѧ 20:58 11-Nov-13
- Delete. No, it is an imitation of a featured and a Top Ten article: Suddenly, Raccoons (the earliest and the most famous one). Suddenly, 'coons was created by Mhaille, while Raccoons - by Hyperbole (there is a mention of him in the article). It seemed pretty funny to me, before I read the original article. Anton (talk) 20:53, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Yawn. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:33, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Confirmed kill. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 22:27, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
# Delete. Made-up nonsense about wars on non-existant planet. Sporadic list cruft and lack of humour. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:59, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. The writing style is decent. Changing it from Destopius vs. Skaylia to Dystopia vs. Utopia would at least make it about something. Spıke Ѧ 19:29 17-Nov-13
- Keep. It's a decent article. BetterSkatez2012 (talk) 01:22, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Per Spike's cleanup. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:03, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. In favour of Spike's reforms. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:04, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Spike, Dystopia (the opposite of Utopia) has nothing in common with this article that's about a fictional planet. Could you move it back to its original title? --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 19:41, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Further history is at User talk:TwinCin#Luigispetpikmin; to summarize, these pages are a personal story arc about "a video game project that was scrapped." Destopius is unremarkable and will only ever get more so; and we have no page on Dystopia, which a few more edits and this page could relate to. Spıke Ѧ 19:43,19:59 17-Nov-13
|
Score: -3 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Epicgenius (talk) 21:11, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. It is good just needs more content. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:56, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Have now provided same. Spıke Ѧ 21:17 19-Nov-13
|
Comments |
- It's a decent start except for three substandard shoops. (I deleted the lead shoop, a freehand "photo" of a trash can whose caption was a really dumb pun on the country name.) It's a low-quality page but it's nice to have something at this address. Spıke Ѧ 14:34 11-Nov-13
- Comment. ScottPat, are you willing to add some, then? --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:06, November 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately not. I neither have ideas nor time. However in its current from it is worth saving still. There is potential for something amazing there though. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:45, November 18, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Redirect to Ubeki Beki Beki Beki Stan Stan --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:45, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
- That page should not exist (though maybe it moves to Uzbekistan). Its page title is the punch line of one section, based on one silly utterance of one candidate in one Presidential election. (You can't remember his name, but it's in the article.) Spıke Ѧ 14:15 11-Nov-13
- Delete and replace with the article named above. Spıke Ѧ 14:45 11-Nov-13
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:04, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Replace etc. I'd like to keep Ubeki Beki Beki Beki Stan Stan as a redirect though. Obscure joke, but I like it. • Puppy's talk page • 07:18 am 21 Nov 2013
- four vote sweep Aleister 19:19 21=11=13
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Comment. Spike, I know but it has way better content. What other sollution is there available? Cut and paste? --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:30, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
- If you are willing. (Wait a day to see what other people say.) Cutting and not pasting everything based on Borat. Spıke Ѧ 14:31 11-Nov-13
- I think you misunderstood me. What I suggested was cutting the content from Ubeki Beki Beki Beki Stan Stan (which has no references to Borat) and then pasting it over the present Uzbekistan article. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:40, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
- That would be an improvement. Win this vote to eliminate the existing page; but then move the old one to the new name to preserve its page history.
I am not convinced there is nothing in the existing page that could be used. Sorry, all it took was a second read. Spıke Ѧ 14:43 11-Nov-13
- If you think that there are parts worth keeping copy and paste them here or, preferably, at my talk page, so we can use them after (and if) the page gets deleted. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:52, November 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Ubeki Beki Beki Beki Stan Stan has now been renamed Uzbekistan, with redirect. Spıke Ѧ 19:33 21-Nov-13
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Don't think that it has any potential. Anton (talk) 19:04, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. We have a featured article on tennis player Novak Djokovic, we don't need a second created under his nickname, and we don't need this drive-by hatchet-job under any name. Spıke Ѧ 19:22 22-Nov-13
- Delete. 15Mickey20 moved this here, stating that “some of you like this”. I can't see any support anywhere for it. It's a muddled concept, and meanders aimlessly. Delete and redirect back to the FA. • Puppy's talk page • 10:44 pm 22 Nov 2013
- Delete. Agreed. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 23:09, November 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I also agree with everyone else, this is already another article on a person. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 15:02, November 23, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
|
Keep (2) |
- Rewritten. Spıke Ѧ 13:02 24-Nov-13
- Keep. Love it now. Thanks Spike. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:34, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This is a shame. There are so many good directions; not just Scrabble, but alphabet soup and the history of the written word. Author finds a few of them, swings, and misses, opting instead for Randumbo. Spıke Ѧ 01:07 24-Nov-13
- I think, however, the only options are re-write or delete as it is not worthy of a keep just for the few good ideas. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:31, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Probably the most useless in the Category:SuperSkye private story arc, which gave us Destopius. Spıke Ѧ 22:49 18-Nov-13
- Delete. Are these planets based on anything or simply made up? Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:06, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Repeating from Comments in the ballot on Destopius/Dystopia, author comments suggest that everything in that category is a personal story arc about "a video game project that was scrapped"--that is, an ad for a product that never came to market, though it does have a Wikia wiki. Spıke Ѧ 20:12 19-Nov-13
- Delete. Hate. • Puppy's talk page • 07:18 am 21 Nov 2013
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 17:35, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. More suitable for the fiction wiki than for here. No humor detected. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 20:18, November 25, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Found through User:Mnbvcxz/VFD. Agree it's crufty and random. • Puppy's talk page • 06:53 05 Nov 2013
- Delete. Random, awful. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 22:47, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:06, November 19, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. Less awful now. Spıke Ѧ 19:25 27-Nov-13
- Keep. Keepable now, due to Spike's rewriting certain sections. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:49, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- There is one good joke here, which occurs without provocation to every twelve-year-old Uncyclopedian: A superfast superhero must not be much of a lady-pleaser. The author recurs to this, when not reveling in swears like "Jew," and cannot keep from patting himself on the back. There is a funny article in here waiting to get out. Spıke Ѧ 11:37 5-Nov-13
- "Flash" (not "the Flash") is a super hero in real life and there was a film made about him with Queen's famous "Flash" tune. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 22:47, November 12, 2013 (UTC)
- That was Flash Gordon. There is a comic strip hero called 'The Flash'. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:13, November 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Ah yes. Thanks Romartus. Well then I have never heard of this "The Flash." Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:54, November 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Four of them, evidently, and the original author seemed to know about them all (or have read WP:The Flash), despite his bouts of stupid humor and self-reference. Spıke Ѧ 19:25 27-Nov-13
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Navelism. • Puppy's talk page • 12:33 am 24 Nov 2013
- Delete. Mordillo names his fellow Admins in a mainspace article. An overt inside joke with a short lifetime that is now over. Spıke Ѧ 00:57 24-Nov-13
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:17, November 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. However, I love the talk page. If you decide to delete the article, please, allow me to move the talk page to my user space, even if it sounds strange. Maybe I will begin keeping record of the funniest conversations on Uncyclopedia. Anton (talk) 19:15, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Keep forever. The premise of the contest was write an article in an hour, then everyone voted keep or delete, and if they were kept, they were kept, hell or high water. A promise is a promise. Well, Hell and high water have come to this site, and we of the Lollipop Guild must battle at every barricade. Aleister 12:12 27/11/13
- Keep. Keep for the sake of the talk page, which wouldn't make sense without the article. This wouldn't be the first time an article has been kept for its talk page. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:40, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep.. This site used to be about fun. Not sure about what it is anymore. ~ 09:37, November 28, 2013 (UTC)
- It is but the world got smaller. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:32, November 28, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Context: This was part of one of the “Article in an hour” competitions, where various users wrote an article in under an hour. The resulting articles were then taken to a VFD type of setting (Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/contest2) where it was voted on wether the article had enough grunt to survive a day. So while this has had a VFD vote previously, it was not a full VFD vote. • Puppy's talk page • 12:33 am 24 Nov 2013
- Comment: Uncyclopedia, I don't know you any more. --UU - natter 22:13, Nov 26
- Well, UU, we need you now. This site isn't as fun as it used to be, but if more people came back and played then we can shake the rafters a little bit. The new people don't know how much people used to play on each others talk pages, vandalize user pages, etc., they are sad and forlorn in their image of uncy and you have left us like a dog leaving another dog after fucking said dog. And SPIKE, please do not move this to my talk page as you have been doing lately, since I've been here VFD pages are fine to expand discussions, especially in the comment section. Thanks. Aleister 12:14 27/11/13
- UU: If you visit an ex-girlfriend after a year, you may also find that the self-portrait you drew is no longer hung in her living room. This is rather less sad than the notion that we are supposed to preserve y'all's monuments to yourself a year after you quit the site en masse.
- Aleister: Uncyclopedia:What VFD is not#A talk page. "Try to refrain from excessive conversation, even in the comments section." Especially on the identity of the website going forward; take it to the Forum. This rule pre-dates me. Spıke Ѧ 19:38 27-Nov-13
- Should I open a forum about UU"s girlfriend then? Ok, sure. Anton (talk) 19:40, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
- Hey Al. I need time. I'd love to be on one of the Uncycs like I used to be. But between work and kids I am actually on here about as much as I can. Hey SPIKE. I'm acknowledging the change with my comment. It's a joke. Y'know, like people make on humour websites? Uncyclopedia has changed several times since I first came here, it is the way of things. If I wanted this article keeping around as a monument to my colossal vanity, I'd have voted keep instead of making a flippant comment. Oh, and I didn't quit the site during the schism - I've been inactive a lot longer than that due to kids and work, as I may have mentioned. Hey Anton199. Girlfriend? Try "wife" - it's like girlfriend, but with less sex and more arguing over who gets the lie-in when the kids wake early. --UU - natter 20:36, Nov 27
- Nice to see you again Under_user. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:27, November 27, 2013 (UTC)
- Did UU just ask someone to try his wife? I'll assume it's the mince pie talking. • Puppy's talk page • 10:04 am 28 Nov 2013
- Hey Pupsicle. Stop reading and wishful thinking at the same time. Hey Romartus. --UU - natter 20:40, Nov 28
|