From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Mashed in-jokes, again. • Puppy's talk page • 12:40 28 Oct 2013
- Navelism. Spıke Ѧ 13:07 28-Oct-13
- Redirect it to Grue ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:42, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Never understood it. Long time since I was in short pants I guess. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:36, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Started life as a redirect, let's end it the same way. Captain gull (talk) 09:10, October 31, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Low-quality meme-cruft humor, but it is a pretty complete article and was featured on the main page. Spıke Ѧ 12:58 28-Oct-13
- You may be confusing this article with Grue, which was a feature. This is not a feature, or a complete article. • Puppy's talk page • 01:01 28 Oct 2013
- Sorry, I was. A grue redirects there. Spıke Ѧ 13:07 28-Oct-13
- Vote closed. Redirected to Grue. Spıke Ѧ 12:34 31-Oct-13
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. I gave it a weak Keep in 2010 and worked on it thereafter. I saw Hitler in the first sentence and was sure I had not done enough, but the previous discussion makes clear his name is not spoken in vain. Perhaps the article itself should make it clearer. Spıke Ѧ 22:10 21-Oct-13
- Per Spike, and I think I worked on this. Feature. Aleister 23-10
- Evidently, you didn't. Otherwise it surely would have been. Spıke Ѧ 17:38 23-Oct-13
- I read it yesterday and it held my attention throughout. You either saved it or a ghost did. Aleister today
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Meme-ridden, random. Aparently out of all people, Adolf Hitler invented 3D animation - surprise! Unfunny. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:59, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree. It reads as incomplete, and the start doesn't promise enough to continue reading. • Puppy's talk page • 09:25 22 Oct 2013
- This specific problem is corrected, as the Intro now has more meat before name-dropping der Führer. Spıke Ѧ 17:38 23-Oct-13
|
Comments |
Kept due to lack of consensus. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 22:53, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Unfunny, random, not likely to be typed in. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:54, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This is a topic we don't need an article on, by an Uncyclopedian with absolutely nothing to say about it. Spıke Ѧ 22:21 21-Oct-13
- Delete. Agreed. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 01:55, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This has a okay mathmatical pun as the base. If 666 is evil, and money is the root of all evil, then 25.807 is the root of evil, ergo 25.807 is money. Beyond that, which the article doesn't explain properly, there is nothing redeeming. I like mathematics humour, so sue me. • Puppy's talk page • 09:20 22 Oct 2013
- It's too bad I didn't use my calculator before voting. And worse that, as you say, the article does not develop its one nexus to the real world. Still, that makes it a page where the reader has to guess the punch line to read the (alleged) joke. Do you know the square root of 69? "Ate something." Spıke Ѧ 11:49 22-Oct-13
- Delete. One in the eye for the nerds. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:34, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (2) |
- Butt Poop series. I think in jokes are so in that people want to push them into being out jokes and then actually push them out. Keep them in and we'll all be happy, including msnbc if he comes back. And this new "delete first" standard, with the color red focusing the eye on delete, is bias towards killing articles and I object by pooping. Aleister pooping right now
- A very rare moment of mine to vote here. I like this article and it's helarious...and I can't imagine why a visitor to this site would be shocked to see an article like this. There is a viewership here for articles like this...and compared to family guy or Seth Rogan movies...this article is like kindergarten. --ShabiDOO 01:21, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
- We are not complaining about the shocking nature of the article, simply about the lack of humour. The only reason that you want to keep it appears to be that it combines some in-jokes (that have been out-dated and forgotten). What is funny about these two specific in-jokes? Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:19, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
- See User talk:Shabidoo#2 wizards and blah blah • Puppy's talk page • 07:29 27 Oct 2013
- No Scott...that is NOT why I voted for. --ShabiDOO 18:29, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
- Point accepted (discussed in Puppy's link). Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:11, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
- There you go, I fixed it. I didn't know what it would look like, and lolololol when I saw it. Aleister 27-10
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. In-joke + shock porn meme = even worse in-joke. • Puppy's talk page • 11:46 26 Oct 2013
- Two in-jokes and a shock porn meme! Aleister 00:28 27-10-'13
- Delete. I'm sorry Al, in-joke or no in-joke doesn't come into it. I see no humour here. As for Mnbvcxz, spell his name right won't you? (It doesn't take a genius to press some keys in order!) Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:37, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
- I play with his name with his consent (between us it's a nickname) and am also trying to save an article by Socky which fits rights into two in-joke series. The humour is there if someone sees it. I find it funny, and weird, just like, ah, Mnbvcxz (yech, no, I don't like spelling it out, but wait, it's a good guitar technique to get used to unusual finger placements. Aleister 26-10
- Delete. Per Scott and Pup. Anton (talk) 17:58, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfunny (apart from author's own glee in subjecting the reader to a discussion of excrement) and unencyclopedic. Spıke Ѧ 19:41 26-Oct-13
- Delete. Worst in-joke I've ever seen. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:57, October 27, 2013 (UTC)
- Who cares? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:39, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Double Navelism without the Whipped Cream (a de Sade Sundae). --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:49, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. PuppyOnTheRadio tagged it, after I mentioned it in passing recently, but no one wrote a nomination. This venerable Uncyclopedia tradition, in which we "vote" our most unfavorite Uncyclopedian off the island — all in fun, of course, but with actual gripes never too far below the surface — deserves to go where, I hope, we have succeeded in sending Joke Bans. Spıke Ѧ 01:01 14-Oct-13
- Delete. I have no objection with joke bans, but this page has exceeded its welcome. Ker-kill it. • Puppy's talk page • 07:37 14 Oct 2013
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 07:47, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Anton (talk) 09:43, October 16, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Aaah, it's so hard saying goodbye to one of the most unfunny jokes in Uncyclopedia, Ban <insert name here>, but a man's gotta do what a man's gotta do. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 07:47, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
- I'm sure <insert name here> will remain a valuable part of this community. Assuming we don't decide to ban <insert name here>, of course. • Puppy's talk page • 09:25 17 Oct 2013
- I think it worth retiring, not deleting per say. It does have some historical value to anyone interested in the site's history. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:36, October 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Vote closed. With no support for the page expressed in two weeks, I will take Frosty's comment as a fifth vote and implement his suggestion of "retiring" the page rather than deleting it. Spıke Ѧ 15:43 29-Oct-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Random. not funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:28, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Cute musical trivia, but terrible article. I'd like to see it as a redirect to HowTo:Get Over Jenny. Anyone navigating to this page would get the reference. • Puppy's talk page • 10:58 24 Oct 2013
- Delete. Puppy's suggested redirect would be an improvement. Spıke Ѧ 13:01 24-Oct-13
- Delete. Agreed. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 00:41, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. As per Pup. Captain gull (talk) 10:24, October 29, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The first sentence is true. The rest of the article is low-quality humor. I've deleted the dumb, disjoint list at Trivia. Spıke Ѧ 10:34 24-Oct-13
- Was voted keep in 2005 as it was a “gateway” to Stalhor curse, which was then VFD'd in 2006. Other than the two editors saying they had re-written it, all the other votes suggested it be re-written. • Puppy's talk page • 12:57 28 Oct 2013
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. The humour was predictable but still not bad. The image should be replaced. The list needs to be shorter. Anton (talk) 08:25, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. (Formerly DELETE) The re-write and touchh up has helped. The comedy is very good now and I laughed a lot. Still annoyed about the list though, still needs improving. Good enough to keep as long as the list is worked on. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:04, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. (Saved--Anton199.) I share ScottPat's concern; the article should not claim to present all 95 theses. One problem we state about lists is that they tell the same joke over and over; the other problem is that they invite dumb additions. Anton's structuring of the theses is admirable, but they are still lists that suffer from these two things. It would be better to substitute a paragraph or two of funny description/overview in each case. Spıke Ѧ 10:23 26-Oct-13
|
Delete (1) |
Delete. Being an ignorant atheist I don't know whether the title refers to a real thing but it starts off with memish, unfunny intro and ends in memish unfunny list (with guess what 96 theses!!!!). Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:32, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. As a practising Roman Catholic Priest of the Jesuit order, I think it has potential. I removed the references to the external site, and the following text that was relating to it, along with the list for lists' sake, and saw a stub with a decent premise, but in need of extension, which with enough rewriting could become accessible to more readers. I'm not going to do the rewrite though, and as it is I think it's too obscure to reach much of an audience, and the external link just bugs me. (Also concerned that it may be too derivative of that external site, but haven't visited it to confirm.) • Puppy's talk page • 12:11 24 Oct 2013
|
Comments |
- If you really don't know if this relates to something real, check Wikipedia before nominating. The Intro has potential. The only section--driven by the need to list 95 things, including in cases where the author punts--is classic listcruft. Can this be reclaimed by deleting this list and making the Intro read cleverly? If not, you can always redirect to Ph.D.. Not that this title is vital, but some of Luther's actual 95 theses surely are suitable for ridicule. Spıke Ѧ 10:38 24-Oct-13
- Ok I have looked up what the 95 theses really is and I am slightly embarrased to have not known about it however the article is still poor and listy so doesn't merit a keep on this wiki. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:59, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
- Rewrote some parts. Still listy, but that's the point, no? Anton (talk) 09:36, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
- No it isn't. When an article is about a list then it should be paragraphed instead of listed. You don't just write a list of the Ten Commandments for the Ten Commandments article or write a list of the seven wonders of the World for the Seven Wonders of the World article. The 95 theses should be mentioned in paragraphed text with some mentioned in detail and some given a quick mention or no mention at all. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:54, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
- I get your points and will work more. Anton (talk) 17:57, October 26, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Random, memish, out-of-date and unfunny. Seems to talk about unrelated dictatorships, a war, a movie and stuff without many links. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:21, October 23, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Written by MeatLoafFan, who must view as a must-read an article about stuff the Powers That Be don't want you to know. The article has nothing to say, funny or not, and no one will look it up in our encyclopedia, even Greens who want to see if we made fun of 10 Years to Save the World by substituting 4 for 10. Author also gave us UnNews:Barack Obama assassinated. Robert Gates sworn in as 44th president. It survived VFD in 2008 on, among other things, Simsie's unfounded hope that lighter humor would be forthcoming. Spıke Ѧ 18:38 23-Oct-13
- Delete. It can go. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:24, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I have no idea what I just read. • Puppy's talk page • 12:03 24 Oct 2013
- Delete. A bad article about a mediocre old pop song. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 16:00, October 25, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Category doesn't make sense. No one will type it in. Random and irrelevant. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:24, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. It does make sense; it is a gaming meme, overused here by authors who think gaming is inherently funny, to mean "a lot." But attaching this category to any page communicates nothing. Spıke Ѧ 10:26 24-Oct-13
- Delete. Anton (talk) 10:41, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:23, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Something something Oprah something. • Puppy's talk page • 11:50 24 Oct 2013
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:02, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I don't like it when UnNews projects are deleted. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 02:00, October 24, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Mentioned in the nomination below. Assassination Humor is not good, even if this one ever got the lightening up that Simsie was hoping for when she voted to Keep it last time. Spıke Ѧ 18:43 23-Oct-13
- Delete. No improvements, too serious and scary. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:50, October 23, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Boris Johnson can technically become President of America. We should tell more Americans that and scare them into getting a good President on the throne of America! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:33, October 23, 2013 (UTC)
- The author is playing with fire, and the Secret Service. So is Bill O'Reilly. Aleister 23-10
- Delete. I don't agree with deleting something based purely on its name space, but also don't agree it retaining something with the same justification. Offsetting the vote with that as justification. • Puppy's talk page • 12:00 24 Oct 2013
|
Comments |
- Puppy's opinion is more than opinion. Votes need to pertain to the contents of the page, and I will exercise the discretion to underweigh votes that do not pertain to the page. Spıke Ѧ 12:17 24-Oct-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Unfunny, lack of content. Written as though refering to 2006 in the future. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:06, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. "This year's list of hurricanes who are expected to cause a trouble." It was written at the start of the 2006 hurricane season. It was very timely then — especially as Hurricane Katrina had hit, FEMA had performed its statutory function of preventing aid from getting to the region before it could be certified as rule-compliant, Bush had just given Brown his vote of confidence and Democrats were salivating. Now it's badly dated, mostly because there is no timeless humor at all. Smells like English as a Second Language. Spıke Ѧ 22:34 21-Oct-13
- Delete. English as a second language, but funny barely makes it in as a 10th language. • Puppy's talk page • 08:57 22 Oct 2013
- Delete. Blow away. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:46, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Would have been better on UnNews but not by much. Captain gull (talk) 10:03, October 23, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. Most of it is pretty funny. Also, if saved, it can be moved to Why?:I eat my own shit and that way it will make more sense. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 11:51, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Move. As below. Spıke Ѧ 12:07 22-Oct-13
- Swayed vote. Damned good template. • Puppy's talk page • 12:26 22 Oct 2013
- Keep and move to Why?space. Captain gull (talk) 10:07, October 23, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. May be funny but is just disgusting. Anton (talk) 09:23, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
Delete. I can deal with disgusting, but this just doesn't have anything funny beyond that. Interesting fact - this. • Puppy's talk page • 09:31 22 Oct 2013
- Yes, it does. "This is not why I lost my children to the state." The serious treatment of an absurd idea is very funny. For the record, we allow "funny but disgusting," though the articles in the Yuky Doody series were merely disgusting. Also, Sannse has never even proposed that we put the phone number of the Poison Control Center at the top of the page with a warning to readers not to actually try the maneuver contemplated on the page. The templates at the bottom are a "victory lap" by the author and should go. Spıke Ѧ 11:44 22-Oct-13
- The “in my opinion” in my above rationale was implied, if not explicit. • Puppy's talk page • 11:58 22 Oct 2013
- I assume most rationales are the voter's opinion. Did I succeed in rebutting it? Spıke Ѧ 12:07 22-Oct-13
- Not really, imo. • Puppy's talk page • 12:10 22 Oct 2013
- I have added a Corporate Cover-your-ass Template so Wikia won't get sued by people eating their own shit. Whew, just in time. Spıke Ѧ 12:20 22-Oct-13
- Okay, that sways my vote. • Puppy's talk page • 12:26 22 Oct 2013
- Delete.Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:46, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. Same reasons as below. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:20, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Yup; like the other one, this isn't clearly based on some real tournament. Author bangs out an elimination match of Uncyclopedia memes. Spıke Ѧ 22:27 21-Oct-13
- Delete. I need healthy oxygen... Wait? Was I voting in my sleeping mind for a moment!? Anyways, I agreed with above. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 01:54, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. As above, and below. • Puppy's talk page • 09:21 22 Oct 2013
- Delete. Even the author got bored before finishing it. Captain gull (talk) 09:23, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Per Captain gull. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 11:57, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Bin it up and leave it to be collected for electron recycling. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:38, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Made-up, un-funny and memish. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:18, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I have never seen this before, and I was surprised when I saw the blood ghost in the picture. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:10, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Newman, that would leave about 30,000 articles you have never seen before (not a reason to vote Delete). Spıke Ѧ 22:25 21-Oct-13
- Delete. We might have a place with a few satire articles on Wikipedia articles on tournaments. But this author banged this out too quickly — The competitors are a list of memes and he can't be bothered to write a report for each of the matches. And, as usual, the page title is a takeoff rather than something someone will search for; that would put pressure on the author to make fun of events in the actual tournament. Spıke Ѧ 22:25 21-Oct-13
- Delete. I think I nommed this once before. As in nominated. I didn't think it was tasty at all. • Puppy's talk page • 08:57 22 Oct 2013
- Delete. "Im lazy again, Brazil wins 1-0. Goodbye" Captain gull (talk) 09:35, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Again, per Captain gull. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 11:58, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. 2007 article about a nonexistent country that's not even linked to any page or template. In short, other than its categories, there was no way someone could've had access to it. Also, if it wasn't for the red links, it would have an OK illustration but it also lacks humour so... --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 10:43, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The only work of author Sampedestal. A neglected page on a nonexistent country and its Wacky War. At the moment when the reader is looking for a reason to jump in, author tells me it borders on Something-or-Other. Spıke Ѧ 11:36 20-Oct-13
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:06, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Badderer. • Puppy's talk page • 09:15 22 Oct 2013
- Delete. Full of red-links, not so full of cleverness. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 20:28, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. "It will run on ten hydrogen fuel cells smaller than a smartie though it will never melt in you'r hands" in the Intro got my interest. Overlong and needs proofreading but it has a strategy. The Template:Game Consoles ensures that it can be found despite its fictionality. Spıke Ѧ 23:53 19-Oct-13
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Nonexistent console that was not ever announced yet, and I have already requested a rewrite for Playstation 4 on that article's talk page just around now. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 23:37, October 19, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This has potential, even though it hasn't quite met it yet. Not a great article, but far from bad. • Puppy's talk page • 09:13 22 Oct 2013
- Vote closed. No interest after 60 hours. Spıke Ѧ 12:30 22-Oct-13
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Another nonexistent country article from 2006 (edited at the start of this year by new user DerkaDerkaStan). Located beneath Iran, "known to take a dump on each others chests to signify great sex." A photo-less dead end. Spıke Ѧ 15:50 18-Oct-13
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 10:34, October 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 17:02, October 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:59, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Captain gull (talk) 08:54, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Hard to pick the lower point between william as a country, or Makalagadanibanafartipantsistanderkaderkastanisherpasherplandsteven. • Puppy's talk page • 09:11 22 Oct 2013
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Non-existent and shitty --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 08:33, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. An article no one is going to look for, except off our Latin America Navigation Template where it reduces the realism of many country articles without increasing their humor. Cute kittens plus a "former Yugoslav republic [that] destroyed the moon." Bonus: A Wacky War. Spıke Ѧ 11:08 14-Oct-13
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:17, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Feline randumbo. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:57, October 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Captain gull (talk) 08:46, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I ask myself, does the one article support the existence of the other? • Puppy's talk page • 09:08 22 Oct 2013
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Non-existent and shitty --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 08:33, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Chapter 2 of a personal fantasy story arc. This one is not even accessible from the nation nav-template (though it is, inexplicably, on Template:Civilization), nor certainly because anyone wants an article on the prehistory of a made-up country. Author Flutter discloses in 2009 that he wrote the article in 2007 but forgot to submit it "here" (going straight to the mirror site?). Spıke Ѧ 11:14 14-Oct-13
- Delete. I'm back from my weekend trip, and I believe this is a spoof off of the Animal Crossing character Olivia. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 12:53, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Dull. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:59, October 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Ditto all of the above. Captain gull (talk) 08:40, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I answer myself - fuck no! • Puppy's talk page • 09:08 22 Oct 2013
|
Comments |
- These pages led me to Symbol, which I think should pop up on this page as a new nomination. • Puppy's talk page • 09:08 22 Oct 2013
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- I don't think it is funny, considering that it is a fake religion. Anton (talk) 13:34, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. It is a fake religion, with the usual trappings of fake relics and rituals that these articles have. Anton's move of it to Fake religion makes it more likely that someone will find it, but less likely that they will understand it once they get there. There is no humor concept except an absurdly long word, which is a joke that was not done by us but by the movie. Spıke Ѧ 13:43 5-Oct-13
- Delete. Burn the heretic! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:34, October 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 09:45, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I looked at WP:Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious to see if there was anything there that could be worked in here to make it better. This isn't as good as the WP version, and that has a clean-up template on it. • Puppy's talk page • 09:03 22 Oct 2013
|
Comments |
- I don't know if this works or not, but I moved this article to Fake religion. I am not taking back my nomination, in case it does not make it better. Anton (talk) 13:41, October 5, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Three lines of writing. Not funny. Written backwards (I don't get that joke) Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:11, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. "Author" took a screenshot of the navigation template, reversed it, and made it the article. Funny? Why? Spıke Ѧ 20:31 2-Oct-13
- The idea is funny, but it is not connected to ). Anton (talk) 15:30, October 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Not funny. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 09:30, October 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Dumb concept, dumb execution. Captain gull (talk) 08:28, October 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. • Puppy's talk page • 08:50 22 Oct 2013
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This is an almost verbatim copy of http://www.dhmo.org/facts.html, and links directly to that site as well. As the originating site is copyrighted, this blatant plagiarism is not original content, and outside of our ToS. • Puppy's talk page • 09:59 19 Oct 2013
- Delete - Agreed Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:00, October 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Moreover, the external site pulls off the hoax better than we do. Not clear this bit of theft requires a VFD vote, but we're almost there. Spıke Ѧ 12:32 19-Oct-13
- Delete. I think so. Anton (talk) 08:50, October 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unoriginal content. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 13:14, October 21, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- "Does anyone give a shit about this arctile" The article has no theme other than: This doesn't exist, no one knows anything, everything sucks, and no one cares. Author NoNameBrand "creaated arctile in a hurry!" in 2008 and nothing was ever done with it, until today Anon replaced the nonsense year number 0 with the nonsense year number √-2. Spıke Ѧ 15:40 11-Oct-13
- Delete. America may have no government but it still exists! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:14, October 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 16:54, October 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Bad article, is just offending me, as it is saying my country is nothing. I also noticed that the author spelled the word "article" wrong as well. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:12, October 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Outdated and unfunny. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 08:09, October 14, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. ScottPat, it's not even based on the US goverment shutdown. Just some "Anti-american" crap. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 16:54, October 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Comment. I do realise, I have read it. I merely mentioned that you can't say America doesn't exist just because it's federal government is non-existant. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:46, October 11, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- Saved. The initial illustration makes it look like a real place, and that is good enough for me. That the Intro also admits that the reader came here looking for simple toilet humor stains it, as it were. I'll work on it. Spıke Ѧ 21:45 11-Oct-13
- Keep. Agreed. It is more an article making fun of a colloquial expression. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:50, October 11, 2013 (UTC)
- And best that it not explain in the Intro that it is doing so. Spıke Ѧ 22:19 11-Oct-13
- Keep. Per Spike's improvements. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 01:23, October 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. This article is bad, and also is not just that, but it is also not a real place, but rather the saying mentioned in the article. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 21:35, October 11, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Anton, you often write against gratuitous obscenity on Uncyclopedia--would you concede that there is sometimes a point to playing in Shit? Spıke Ѧ 22:24 11-Oct-13
- Sometimes. Anton (talk) 11:29, October 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. The slash character has a storied history in computing, and I've now provided some of it. Spıke Ѧ 13:25 2-Oct-13
- Keep. It's true, this article really lacks of humour right now but what it does have is a very neat appearance which generates high hopes to me. Maybe add a couple of images (That's going to be kinda hard) and some good old penis jokes and it can become a pretty good article. Well, as good as an article about a slash can be. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 22:10, October 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Illustration, check. Penis joke, check. Vote closed. Spıke Ѧ 13:30 13-Oct-13
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Devoid of content. Lacking humour. Utter randomness. It is only there as a filler for the keyboard alphabet template. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:08, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Not that funny. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 12:56, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. The concept is great, as nominator says, and the execution could be repaired. On the talk page, departed Admin Andorin Kato explains why he did not take the page to VFD in 2009 despite its awful second half. This is ready-made instructions to anyone wishing to earn a VFD Save. (I voted Delete in 2010, saying I didn't see a point to the page.) Spıke Ѧ 22:08 3-Oct-13
- Strong keep. What Spike said. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:52, October 7, 2013 (UTC)
- My mom's a little red teacup, short and stout. Here is her handle, here is her spout. Aleister 11-10
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Unfunny, random, nonsense. I think the concept of a British naval officer being a drug lord is great but this article poorly executes it with a made-up name. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:09, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Made up event. Horrible title. Not funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:53, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Anon in 2006 uses a page title no one will look for, for yet another retelling of the Welsh sheep-shagger joke, and not a terribly clever one. But I have fixed the inept start of the article. Spıke Ѧ 22:05 4-Oct-13
- Delete. Agreed. No
title picture either. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:25, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, but absence of pix is usually remedied by editing, not deleting. Spıke Ѧ 12:42 6-Oct-13
- Delete. If it was funnier it may have been worth keeping but it isn't so it goes. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:18, October 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Crap -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 10:14, Oct. 11, 2013
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Awful article from 2007, and we're nothing but picking up steam for newer qualities. Delete. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 23:20, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. It almost reads like an UnNews — or that bikers from Devon are writing about themselves. Spıke Ѧ 23:24 2-Oct-13
- Delete. Agreed. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:38, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Anton (talk) 12:27, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Lol Steam, water... am I the only one who saw that? But yeah, the article sucks. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 13:30, October 11, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. It is an article by TOAST who was later unmasked as a sock puppet by a group of users (see TOAST's discussion page and my response at the time). That aside, the article isn't bad enough to be deleted in my view. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:14, October 6, 2013 (UTC)
- Liked the page when it was written, like it now. And per Romartus. TOAST was a fine user, and gave many people many laughs many times. Aleister 9-10
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Unfunny, nonsensical. Made-up event. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:45, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Author TOAST begins, "I feel it necessary to give you my recollection of that day's event." (Shabidoo wrote the final words, "which of course, never happened" to add insult to injury.) I hope no one outside this panel feels it necessary to read the recollection. Spıke Ѧ 22:16 4-Oct-13
- Delete. Babble. Just babble. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:20, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Listcruft. Random nonsense that isn't funny. Meme/in-joke about a user who is no longer here that only a few people will ever get. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:56, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. First-person vanity with a description of the joy of writing first-person vanity. If anyone wants to preserve the past, simply move this to BHOP where it belonged. Spıke Ѧ 19:12 1-Oct-13
- Delete. Bad article. Delete. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 12:52, October 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. As per author's request. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:20, October 10, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. It's one of Frosty's articles. Could park it there if we don't want it on mainspace. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:15, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
- You or I could retrieve it from the mag-tapes if he protests. Or he could, come to think of it. Spıke Ѧ 22:13 3-Oct-13
- Everything I wrote pre-2012 sucks unbelievably. Huff away. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:52, October 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Your wish is my command, as it is almost entirely your article (with contributions by subject and by others who have fallen away). Two of the illustrations are orphans except in your userspace; please clean up if you think they suck unbelievably as well. Spıke Ѧ 14:54 10-Oct-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. I don't even. • Puppy's talk page • 11:31 01 Oct 2013
- Delete. Leet in the title ensures readers will never select it. It has only one concept, government conspiracy, on which it breaks no ground. It has no humor. I considered moving this article, to double down and ask voters if you would delete it if it were our only article on the nation, but Cameroon is comparatively complete. Spıke Ѧ 12:11 1-Oct-13
- Delete. Agreed. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:56, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This article is downright painful to my viewing, and agreed with everyone above. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:21, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:21, October 10, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I just voted to save this good article deja vu style. Will take out the one quote too many. ALeIsTeR 15-9-'13
- You didn't. I just have (removed Wilde #2 and "Some redneck guy"). It doesn't change a thing. Deleting Section 4 (the listcruft) wouldn't help either. Spıke Ѧ 23:59 15-Sep-13
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Awful. Not funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:35, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The point of this page is the glee of swearing to strangers. When it documents the many uses of the word "fuck," it's informative and not funny. When it dabbles in history, it's babbling and not funny. Spıke Ѧ 12:48 15-Sep-13
- EXTERMINATE! Awful. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 23:54, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Insert gratuitous link to Tvtropes article on Screw Yourself. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 17:04, September 16, 2013 (UTC)(Curse you abusefilter17 D:)
- Delete. The article is funny from time to time. But you can see how the author struggles with himself in order to write comedy and not a pornographic novel. At some moments, you can actually see a border between the two. P.S. I did not understand why the "the whore I am" picture violated Wikia terms of use. But, anyway, we won't need this image anymore, of the article gets deleted. Anton (talk) 07:38, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The article is poorly named, but as we already have an article named Fuck the author was limited in what he could do. Having said that we need a good article on Fuck, but there's a huge challenge - it ha been done before many, many times. Every attempt to create a new article on Fuck - or any of it's derivative forms - that I have seen over the time I've been active has been a copy of something I have read off-site. This is not a bad article, but what's good about it has been done too many times before to be classed as "original humour". • Puppy's talk page • 07:54 28 Sep 2013
- All gone. In view of the strong argument in Puppy's non-vote, the weak argument in Aleister's "deja vu" (based on some other ballot) vote, and the fact that Aleister already saved the illustration he wanted, citing the inevitability of this vote, I have huffed it with just a +4. Spıke Ѧ 14:46 10-Oct-13
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (2) |
- Nope (Ruining Scott's nomination) The George Bush quote us very good! I especially liked the last parts of the article, but even the first ones can work. Scott, the fact that you were new, does not mean it is bad. Anton (talk) 17:01, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
- It's random, unfunny nonsense. The title refers to a made up war. A better version can be found at War of 1812. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:14, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
- If you really want to, then I will take back my vote. But don't be so critical to yourself: the article may need a slight rewrite but it is good. Anton (talk) 17:45, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Not on the strength of yet another observation that Bush was an inept speaker. Spıke Ѧ 18:26 3-Oct-13
- Well, since it has gone so long without a delete decision I'm gonna vote to keep it. And since it may be kept, only Allah knows, I urge ScottPat to bring it up to feature status. That's usually a good way to handle the dogs you've written. So Keep. Aleister 4-10-'13
|
Delete (2) |
- Self-nom and Delete Vote for my article please! Yes well what can I say I was a noob. Utter random, incoherent nonsense with minimal funny parts. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:38, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed. In case Puppy again objects to having to review for deletion a page with only one contributor, I disclaim my brief involvement with it. Spıke Ѧ 16:47 3-Oct-13
|
Comments |
- Vote closed. Nominator is allowed to renominate in one month; or you can try QVFD, where I am unsure whether the salient point is that it has only one contributor or, like a Parliamentary motion, it was "given to the body" and cannot be unmade. Having sought a vote and not gotten it, however, perhaps you had better not try work-arounds. Spıke Ѧ 23:22 7-Oct-13
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. This actually is a well-read and well-known page here. It was saved in the past with a large plurality of votes, and that alone should render it untouchable. A popular page, even though it isn't hilarious (although most 12 year olds are, the young women at least, who I pry away from their mothers with candy apples and folding money). Aleister Gandhi's Birthday, '13
- Keep. What Al said. Except the bit about stealing children - my parole officer may be reading. Pup What's good for the goose is good for the Ghandi, '13
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Not that funny. Un-encyclopedic. Use of second person. Random images. It would be funnier if it was an article written as though it resembled a 12 year old writing it. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:30, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. There is humor to be had on this subject. But as it goes on and on with actual dialogue of 12-year-olds, it becomes clearer that author thinks they are so stupid as to be funny, and author is cataloguing their humor rather than writing humor. Spıke Ѧ 20:38 2-Oct-13
|
Comments |
- I abstained in 2010 when this was kept, 6-1; I was not here in 2007 when it survived, 4-5. Spıke Ѧ 20:38 2-Oct-13
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. I don't get it. It's seems a little bit too childish. --2nd Chance for me (because I was banned.) (Say) 21:42, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The subject of the article, "2005cruft," is our term for crufty articles that have been on the site since its start, in 2005. This is archetypal bad writing that is not saved by being "a page in the style of the thing it's about." Namely, unattributable quotations, memes from Chuck Norris to Hitler, swastikas painted on anuses, lists of junk entries, and nonsense numbers. It is the typical page that offers the author the glee of having finished an Uncyclopedia page without having to spray-paint a bridge abutment, and offers the reader nothing. Spıke Ѧ 21:52 3-Oct-13
- Revenge Of The Bronies - "It seem's a little bit too childish." - A guy who watches a cartoon for little girls on Mr-ex777's writing. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 08:07, Oct. 4, 2013
- My anus already has too many swastikas ...I'd rather not talk about it... (Talking about the anal swastikas; concerning the page, I usually like things in the style of the thing that its written about, but this isn't good enough for me to giggle... like a schoolgirl)--The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 116:54, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Anton (talk) 18:55, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Rubbish. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:33, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. My main criteria, while judging the article, is, when everything that ought to be cut out would be cut out, if there would still be anything good in the article. In this case, I think that there will. There are many jokes, but they are not phrased well: that's why the article should be rephrased. There is some absolutely useless first and second persona, but that too can be changed. Anton (talk) 18:48, September 30, 2013 (UTC)
- A save by Anton. Aleister 3-10-'13
- Spike did the second half. Anton (talk) 05:57, October 4, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Not funny, full of memes. Use of 2nd person and Un-encyclopedic writing. Rambles on about made-up nonsense. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:25, September 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. ??? --Sog1970 (talk) 19:37, September 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. As a semi-response to Anton, I'd like to point out my rationale. I look for the humour in an article, but also how accessible that humour is. If the humour is buried in incomprehensibility, I'll consider how much effort it would take to remove the chaff and leave the pearls. I then consider the time it would take me to do it, and if I'd get value for the effort. In this instance I'd have to remove 80-90% of the existing content, and rewrite the remainder to legibility. That would leave me with a two paragraph stub, which isn't sufficient to support it's survival as a stand-alone article. Then I'd have to build a concept around that stub, and expand fivefold in order to get an article oreasinable length with only a small amount of value behind it.
- If I was to instead leave it to be deleted, it opens up an avenue for another writer to come along and create a new article from scratch, without being bogged down by the existing junk. It removes a poor article from existence, which discourages the croon of similar dross.
- In short, it shouldn't survive as is, and I'm not going to fix it, so better for it to be deleted, and make room for new creative input. • Puppy's talk page • 10:03 01 Oct 2013
- You did not notice that I have rewritten half of the article. Anton (talk) 06:02, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
Delete. All of the above, and also a poor imitation of English. It needs a theme. 10:13 29-Sep-13 Rescinded. Spıke Ѧ 10:12 3-Oct-13
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Not humourous. Random facts, country doesn't even exist. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:22, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The intro makes it clear that the country doesn't exist and the article won't be worth the reader's time. Full of anti-gay and racial tension. Spıke Ѧ 19:28 26-Sep-13
- Delete. Per above even though I don't believe that just because an article is about an non-existent country makes it automatically qualified for VFD. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 19:33, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, it doesn't matter if it doesn't exist, but the lack of humour does very much matter. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:05, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. It can go. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:12, October 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
Keep. Saved, by me in my userspace. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:18, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Vote struck. See my comment below. Taking a copy of this article for rework does not mean you want the existing article kept. If deleted, you would be free to republish a new article if you significantly repaired it. If kept, indeed, it would be controversial for you to totally rework what we voted to keep. Spıke Ѧ 13:39 2-Oct-13
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. This listy little article has only one joke: that a frankfurter is essentially a penis, something it was delightful for the young author to type but won't take the reader anywhere he has not already gone in his mind. Redirecting this to Dogshit sandwich would kill two birds with one stone. Spıke Ѧ 14:56 2-Sep-13
- Delete. Agreed. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:38, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Anton (talk) 08:32, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. I am planning to make an improvement to this article in my userspace and removing the lower organ jokes and other stupid stuff. And this would probably be the case. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 20:55, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Your "plan" seems to have halted voting on this page. Please take a copy of it now (or ask me for a copy after it gets deleted). Deletion will not bar you or anyone from writing a replacement page. Spıke Ѧ 14:15 14-Sep-13
- Comment. Inconclusive after 721 hours. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 16:38, October 2, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Same thing. Anton (talk) 15:54, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:30, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. It seems as though every member of the Uncyclopedia clique (that stormed away together "in protest of Wikia") wrote one. This one was designated during the website's notorious Kristallnacht but spared, certainly as a personal favor. Oh, sorry, we are supposed to address content: Well, there is nothing funny about the article. Spıke Ѧ 17:17 28-Sep-13
- Delete. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 17:42, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:47, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- An in-joke about an in-joke which parodies another in-joke. In-jokes all the way down. Anton (talk) 12:43, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. So many of them; and the only thing that makes them even interesting (they are not funny) is that there are others. Spıke Ѧ 13:20 28-Sep-13
- Delete. Wouldn't want this now would we? Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:49, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. It's turtles all the way down! Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 17:42, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
- The world stands on in-jokes. Anton (talk) 19:59, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Serious case of ingrowing navelism. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:49, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- I am tired. Tired of all these in-jokes. I am tired of all the in-jokes about in-jokes. I am tired of people creating them to make themselves look cool. Anton (talk) 12:43, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Author is tired. Tired of writing comedy, and increasingly convinced that he is the comedy and not merely the craftsman, as when even Saturday Night Live had the cameras pan out and capture their acting rather than the act. This is what I always mean by "amusing the author to prank the reader." These articles aren't funny beyond the act of creating them and trading winks with fellow pranksters. Spıke Ѧ 13:18 28-Sep-13
- Delete.Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:49, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 17:42, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. C'est merde. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:56, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A creation by Yours Truly in their early days as an Uncyclopedian. Made-up theory riddled by memes and un-humourous writing. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:17, September 27, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Nominator is the only contributor. You have come a long way. Spıke Ѧ 11:27 27-Sep-13
- Delete. Quotes, lists, typical "newb" pitfalls. Start over. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 12:45, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
The title alone, "Theory of Cosmos", opens a large horizon of possible jokes and gives and such a theme gives an opportunity to develop a great humour strategy. Now, I don't know why the author did not do this. Scott... Anton (talk) 12:59, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Author request, so voting blind purely to add numbers to what could have been done via QVFD with no eyebrows raised. (If it was "That time I was nearly raped by a quatum physicist during my sojourn into the theory of the cosmos" I'd vote to keep.) • Puppy's talk page • 09:43 01 Oct 2013
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Not very funny. Badly written. Not very encyclopedic. Rambles on and doesn't make many jokes about scientists running the country other than to make pokemon references mock Jews and mention Pac Man. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:02, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Dittos. First part has nothing really new or witty to say about Hitler v. Jews but uses them both as memes. Section 2 stalls as author asks himself why he is rambling, then rambles about Uncyclopedia, then dives in about Bush and the No Child Left Behind law. Author has no wit to add to that either; is it merely advocacy? Finally, the memes line up in lists, from "L Ron Hubbard" to "You". Get rid. Spıke Ѧ 17:27 26-Sep-13
- Delete. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 23:05, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Ugh -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 01:07, September 27, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:51, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Former name with quotation marks was a pointless redirect that I have now deleted. Spıke Ѧ 17:23 26-Sep-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A gamer provides his view of the band. To-wit: "a merry group of fags, who one day decided to record the sound of there own love making." If you jump in despite that Intro, the first section tells a joke with excessive recursion. It is nothing but toilet humor thereafter, and that's after I deleted a listing of band members and the usual Discography. Spıke Ѧ 02:48 14-Sep-13
- Delete. Awful. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:25, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
- That was easy. Terrible article first made in 2005, during the very early days of Uncyclopedia. It had improved some more, then someone added pictures and more other stuff. Then, someone decided to blank part of it, and it still remained a very poor and unfunny article for years. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:13, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
- If you have found a version in the page history that you think is better, you are welcome to substitute it (and reattach {{VFD}}) and we'll vote on that. In fact, the nominator is supposed to do that. Spıke Ѧ 13:18 14-Sep-13
- Delete. Anton (talk) 09:16, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:52, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Someone put in a large amount of time over several days, and then came back to edit it quite awhile later, and likely learned a lot here during this process. But I'm voting to keep the page since I don't think it's enough to huff. Maybe the author just needs a note on his talk page to go back and polish it and/or ask for assistance. Aleister 19:00 in these parts
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. I am not convinced that Anon today at Talk:Perrin Aybara ("This is the best thing to ever hit internet!") is not just a random spambot, but he has found a cache of babble, Randumbo, and listcruft. Spıke Ѧ 21:23 5-Sep-13
- Delete. God, this is awful. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 18:55, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The quotes are bad and once they are removed it leaves nothing. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:46, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. It is very old and I don't think the author will ever want to come back. But we can still notify him. Anton (talk) 09:18, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- That was easy. Not funny. It is somewhat possible that someone can salvage this. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 20:30, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Pants. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:53, October 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Keepable now. Spıke Ѧ 12:58 21-Sep-13
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Poor article from 2008 that has been bad and offending since then. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:36, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I've renamed this article to align with the actual name of the TV show and its Wikipedia article, and will edit it to make clear that the Duggars are not specific, non-celebrity individuals being cyberbullied (for which I briefly banned Anon). It is a cruft magnet, as the TV show is about a Christian family with a disdain for birth control. Anyone with a beef about breeders, Christians, and toothless hillbillies, will pile on. At the moment, the article has no comedy strategy except ridiculing the Duggar Family, and by extension any family that shares their values, and calling them sluts. This could be remedied. Spıke Ѧ 22:58 16-Sep-13
- I rewrote the "Before kids" section so that it aligns more closely with the Wikipedia article, and I think it works better. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 01:37, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Yikes! hope that isn't autobiographical! Also, the table of the 19 kids is serving the exact function that listcruft usually does: As an Anon magnet to tell the same joke again. Is there a better approach here? Spıke Ѧ 12:58 21-Sep-13
- No, I never married or had kids, and my conversion experience was much earlier in life (and not at a service), so it's not autobiographical. As to the table, a better approach would be to have a section about each one of the kids, with a corresponding paragraph (similar to the one I deleted about the oldest because it failed hard), but I am not familiar enough with the show or the kids to do so myself. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 15:56, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Me neither, having temporarily concluded (see above) that this was Anon thinking his neighbors the Duggars needed ridiculing on Uncyclopedia. Your suggestion would solve the table's problem, if anyone out there can undertake it. Spıke Ѧ 17:14 21-Sep-13
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. A shining example of the past must not be destroyed. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 19:05, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Had never seen it before, opened it up, and smiled. So, keep, for personal phsyiological (u spell it) reaction. Aleister 26-9
- Keep. Same as above. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 12:47, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Not funny.
Only content is an image and a Russian reversal meme. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:53, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Correction it has an option setting which means that a number of unhumorous memes appear. These are either dead or simply not funny and this article has no place on this website. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:55, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. One of the website's most ponderous examples of an author amusing himself by pranking the reader. Spıke Ѧ 17:59 26-Sep-13
- Delete. God no. --Sog1970 (talk) 21:08, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This page has been on the site since 2006. It is the essence of chav-cruft and used to contain a section inviting future editors to document individual chavs. Editorializing in the page title and the title's unusual spelling (which no random reader is ever going to type) is because its sole purpose has always been to document, and to guide Uncyclopedia readers to, a specific blog in the
.uk domain (references now removed). It is not original comedy writing. Spıke Ѧ 13:49 16-Sep-13
- Delete. Bang and the article is gone! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:31, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Absolute wank. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 10:00, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't think this article is funny. Voted. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 02:13, September 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Anton (talk) 12:45, September 28, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. A real article, about a real "comedian", with a real comedy strategy: Misstate the source material. Ali does not seem like a good comedian, mostly specializing in racial stereotypes; and this article isn't the best ever, mostly replacing the truth about Ali with the exact opposite without using the change to make a clever point, but it is trying to do what we try to do. Spıke Ѧ 11:18 15-Sep-13
- Per Spike. Aleister 15-9
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Bad article, and I don't see any thing that funny in this article. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 19:45, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
, , ,
Score: -2
|
Keep (2) |
- This page is linked to our "Letters of the Alphabet" thingy, which links all the stuff on a keyboard to an article. Seems OK as well. I'll add in at least one funny now, but not wholesale funny. Aleister 26-9
- For. (Formerly Delete) I have cleaned-up this article once again to get into a state where the un-encyclopedicness can be balanced out by the humorous content. It is too good for deletion now and simply needs continued repair work to get it back on its legs. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:52, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. No humour breaking into unnecesary AAAAA meme. Tendency to use "you." After an attempted clean-up by nominator article remains devoid of content save an (admittedly) amusing "find the full-stop amongst the commas" game which, although does not grant the article a save, certainly could be used in a re-write. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:02, September 26, 2013 (UTC)
Delete. Seems to be motivated more by the need to have an article on it than by having anything to say. Rewriters: The, comma, is often, used, to, imitate, William, Shatner's, acting. 18:07 Rescinded Spıke Ѧ 18:58 26-Sep-13
|
Comments |
- Nomination withdrawn. Spıke Ѧ 18:58 26-Sep-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Not funny and very un-encyclopedic. No images just random rant. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:05, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Created in 2005. In 2009, editor TPCBD arrived, so if you are wondering about the acronym in the second paragraph and at the start of Military Ranking, it is a specific Uncyclopedian quoting himself. This fanboy cheerleading has no purpose except to guide readers to the external website given at the end. Spıke Ѧ 13:10,13:12 22-Sep-13
- Delete. No redeeming features and an annoying p in the title. --Sog1970 (talk) 13:11, September 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:20, September 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:40, September 25, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Even after taking off points for flaunting the C Word--the one swear that still isn't diluted by overuse but has the power to make people in the central USA resolve never to return to Uncyclopedia and agitate to get us blacklisted from surfing from the local Public Library--this article is well-done. The concept that Public Broadcasting's Sesame Street would produce a children's album that someone is a fat cunt is a hilarious concept, and developed with believability. You don't need to know that Codeine was an Uncyclopedian, although of course it would be better if it had not been written partly to pester a member. Spıke Ѧ 11:32 15-Sep-13
- Per Spike. What are we turning into now, the Cultural Revolution?? Aleister 15-9
- Dongs --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 22:26, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Another in-joke and not a very nice one. Anton (talk) 09:07, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. And another one gone...Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:22, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't find this funny, and whoever put this article with Sesame Street making a band for hate against Codeine sobered to hurt Uncyclopedia's feelings. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 12:48, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfunny Navelism. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:36, September 19, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It would be more searchable if put under Fat cunt, and another possible theme is to suggest that PBS did produce an album in response to another Republican Party push-that-went-nowhere a few years ago to de-fund that federal agency. As the legislators were obscure, still are, and will only get more obscure, perhaps the album was George W. Bush Is a Fat Cunt. I might be able to do this in a Pollyana way that did not look like just more anti-Bush advocacy, but I'm inclined to leave this article as is. Spıke Ѧ 11:32 15-Sep-13
- Comment. This needs significant deletion. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:04, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (2) |
- Sigh. Aleister 15-9
- Keep. You know, I never got why Aleister doesn't use a sig file. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 04:21, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Because the four tithes thing is up in the corner and it's too easy to hit something which catapults the entire computer into a different dimension. And besides, it's too boring. Al'ster later that day
- Aleister, seriously, please, don't vote for an article only because it is an in-joke. Please. Anton (talk) 07:41, September 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Navelism no doubt but quite funny in a way. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:38, September 19, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. And another one... Anton (talk) 09:14, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. ...bites the dust. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:21, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. In contrast to Codeine is a fat cunt (album) (nominated below), this article, about RAHB (fallen-away Uncyclopedia Admin who did indeed talk a lot about his dick) is ranty, hard on the eyes, takes a detour into tedious repetition that has nothing to do with RAHB, and does indeed assume the reader knows RAHB and revels in bullying. Spıke Ѧ 11:39 15-Sep-13
- Delete. Making fun of a good admin now active on the other site. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 12:31, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- However, rather than a campaign to make our mark on the site by tracking down and killing all the favorites of a previous generation, might we simply try to outdo them? Spıke Ѧ 11:39 15-Sep-13
- Do you mean we should begin creating articles about ourselves? HowTo:Be SPIKE, Why?Is SPIKE's name written in all the capitals, UnScripts:My Short Talk With The Uncyclopedia Admins... Right? Anton (talk) 12:54, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Certainly not; a new generation of in-jokes would not "outdo" in-jokes with a heritage. Spıke Ѧ 12:59 15-Sep-13
- So what's the problem with deleting the old in jokes that no one gets and so have no humour value and not creating any in-joke articles of our generation? Keeping old in-jokes on this site is like Wikipedia having a page on why the Earth is flat. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:01, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
[1] In other words, such a thing exists on Wikipedia. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:59, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- However this is an article about a society, not an article about a fact that wikipedia agrees with. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:45, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Wikipedia has many pages on notorious untruths. Simsie, ScottPat should have written that this would be like Wikipedia having multiple pages ridiculing Jimbo Wales et al. Spıke Ѧ 17:59 16-Sep-13
- Whatever Spike, the point still stands. No point letting old in-jokes collect dust. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:25, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Mainspace does not need a concatenated list of the titles of MadMax's favorite Uncyclopedia articles. Spıke Ѧ 11:48 15-Sep-13
- Delete. Firstly it's "Where's Wally" not "Where's Waldo." Secondly it's barely an article and more an advertisement. Thirdly there needs to be an article on this and I will attempt to write one. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:13, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Where's Waldo is the name under which it was published in the USA. (Wikipedia: "In translations of the franchise, Wally has often been given a name in the local language".) The time you spent chiding us for being un-British could have been spent correcting the vote count. Spıke Ѧ 12:40 15-Sep-13
- Hey Spike give it a break, everyone knows it's Waldo in US, Wally in Britain. I was just joking.Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:48, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- I read that book in the past. The text and unfunny stuff in this article ruins the joke about the book. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 12:55, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- The idea is good but the long list is pointless, because the place where Waldo is indicated. It can be rewritten, however. Anton (talk) 13:00, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Funny for a bit, not anymore. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 17:03, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. That, I believe, makes the quorum. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 10:10, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. An awful, old article from 2005 with babble. Same reason with Wallet. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 12:43, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The article does nothing for the reader. Happily, the Intro signals that the article will do nothing for the reader. Spıke Ѧ 12:50 15-Sep-13
- Agreed Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:59, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- The nominator forgot to tag the article with VFD. Anton (talk) 13:02, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- I have thus given the article another 19 minutes of life. Spıke Ѧ 23:52 15-Sep-13
- Delete. There we go. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 10:10, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Unfunny article referring to the Pokemon Snorlax. There is nothing but ramble, babble and Randumbo. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 20:28, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. From the Intro on, the tone of this article is not humor but fanboy cheerleading. Spıke Ѧ 13:51 16-Sep-13
- Delete. Agreed. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:18, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Nadgers. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:28, September 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. What bollocks. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 10:00, September 20, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Rozen Maiden be... an anime I haven't watched yet. This falls into the category of things written in d style of d ting. plz frgiv mi lowrin comprhndpld. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 15:32, September 12, 2013 (UTC)(Although maybe for legal purposes, we should put an epilepsy warning on the page.)
- Keep. No, this article does not need more DESU. That is the joke. The idea is that the internet does not need more DESU, contrary to the outdated meme "needs more DESU". -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:13, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Someone took the time to create this about a meme that apparently lots of people know. I dunno it. But if there was a similar Boxxy page I'd vote to keep it. Boxxy! Aleister 14-9
|
Delete (4) |
- This page does not need more DESU. Even though the idea may not be specifically bad, the format hurts my eyes and the content is almost worthless. Anton (talk) 15:29, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. A creation of Mr-ex777, who begins by declaring it "A MEME THAT NO ONE LIKES" in the Intro, which should be making a case for the reader to read further, rather than telling him he doesn't want to. "Desu" is Japanese for "it is," and Wikipedia--where the page doesn't use all capitals--notes the character in Rozen Maiden who repeats the word incessantly. DSA510's claim above that the article is a "page in the style of the thing it's about" is no defense, given that the thing it's about is mindless and stupid, and the page itself is unreadable, painful to look at, and assembled with no cleverness. Author himself tagged it with Category:Unfunny. Spıke Ѧ 16:04 12-Sep-13
- Delete. Agree with above. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:25, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Kill. Really unfunny, and constantly gives us a stupid joke. I definitely agree that this should be deleted. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 19:38, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. The only enduring creation of Chaoarren before his recent
three-month permanent ban for sockpuppetry, creating ranty pages, and ban evasion in order to undo Newman66's attempted repair. He asked for a Pee Review, and here it is: The English is horrible (bad spelling and no concept either of sentences or punctuation). The Intro is uninviting; the body of the article is listy and styled as a chat session, not an encyclopedia article. The humor is a slapstick in the author's own mind and never effectively involves the reader. “Fuck no!” Spıke Ѧ 14:09 14-Sep-13
- Delete. This article is mostly lists, and does not have enough content without the lists to survive. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 16:40, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
- The article is very new but yes, it is not very entertaining and funny. Anton (talk) 18:04, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:25, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The bell tolls for thee. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 17:01, September 16, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Strong keep I opened the page and laughed. imnho there is absolutely nothing wrong with these kind of pages, unless they multiply. In this one Mhaille's essence and goodwill here is captured perfectly in two words. I won't tell you which two. Aleister 20:04 14-9
- Good fuck? Or you sir? Anton (talk) 09:15, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. I would place it on QVFD, if it did not have history and if it was not an in-joke. Anton (talk) 17:31, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Of course. Anon dishes comedy-free drama at former Admin and (in the History) Admin replies by proposing it for main-page featuring. Although drama from Anon (in its awkward desperation) can be among the most hilarious events here (or it can be an attempt to showcase Anon's stupidity to make a point), this should be a site for original (deliberate) comedy for a new generation of readers--whether or not they know who Mhaille is or what the drama was about--not our personal diary. Spıke Ѧ 18:05 14-Sep-13
- Delete. Nothing of significance links here, and those left at this site might not know who Mhaille was. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 18:10, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Burninate! I have seen other articles like this such as Fuck ChiefjusticeDS, and they are usually not funny and hate. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 19:35, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Needs moar text I read that in a nanosecond. Literally. Of course, I am hyperlexic... --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 21:39, September 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Please may we nominate Fuck Chief JusticeDS too. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:01, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
- I bet we can't. Not only is it a feature, but it is also one of the best 2010 articles. But there are plenty others: just check Category:Uncyclopedia In-Jokes. Anton (talk) 09:09, September 15, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
SATB choir (was Young Peoples guide to the SATB Choir)
Score: -3
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep (formerly Delete). A copy-edit makes it seem funnier. Spıke Ѧ 16:50 12-Sep-13
- Keep. (formerly Delete) Agreed. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:28, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
- I can haz defect 2 uder sid? :3 --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 17:43, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. This isn't funny. Its like uh... that thing that was vfd'd to death. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 16:03, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
Delete. All of our articles on band instruments annoy me, as they are mostly high-schoolers devising unclever stereotypes about their classmates. This article has minimal superficial faults (all-capitals section heads and not enough photos), but the content is all stereotype and disparagement. (Who knew that the altos and the tenors were gay?) It was written to report, not to amuse. Spıke Ѧ 16:13 12-Sep-13
Delete. Wow something/someone's gay! Hahahahaha, oh my God that is soooo funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:24, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
- The gratuitous gay jokes are now out, and the gay jokes that are not out are not so gratuitous. Spıke Ѧ 16:50 12-Sep-13
|
Comments |
- Article renamed. Spıke Ѧ 18:35 12-Sep-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I apologise for the presence of the external links, I was not aware of that rule and I have now removed them from the page. I think otherwise though the page is a fairly entertaining religious spoof and worth keeping around the site, even if it needs some improving. JoJoDeathunter (talk) 13:28, September 10, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Yet another Wacky Religion. Uncyclopedian JoJoDeathunter, active in this page's past, was in yesterday and "Updated page to reflect changes in source material"--notably, sprucing up the pointer to
jojo-pieism at Blogspot. Namely, this isn't original comedy writing; it is an advertisement to hump Uncyclopedia traffic to a meme belonging to JoJo and developed somewhere else. Spıke Ѧ 11:38 10-Sep-13
- Delete. Sorry mate but too many quotes. Unencyclopedic templates. That could all be fixed without deletion if ir wasn't for the fact that this was unoriginal and an advertisement of someone else's comedy. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:47, September 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't like people writing stuff here solely as an advertisement, so there's that. Hi JoJoDeathhunter. Please don't take these no votes as GTFU votes, and you can put the page in your user pages and both work on it until it is perfect and, at the same time, write other articles. Writing about subjects you know is kind of fun, but on others you can just make it up as you go along. Aleister 10-9-'13
- Delete. Poor, unloved article. Who would want to search for "Pieism"? Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 12:33, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:58, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
- :)~nya rawr~ >:) --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 15:30, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The only funny point I can see is that Pieism is a religion supporting pies. The text is also full of "JoJos". And I expected Pieism to be a mathematical religion... Anton (talk) 15:14, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Vote closed. Userspaced based on discussion with author; I note Anton199's point at User talk:JoJoDeathunter, so I could have deleted the article administratively as overt vanity, and will do if it returns without rework. Spıke Ѧ 15:48 12-Sep-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
I am totally at a loss as to why this is nominated (not saying that in any mean way, I truly can't imagine why without trying). It presents facts which I found very educational, stuff I didn't know about. Then it follows the facts with a punchline, that usually made me laugh or at least smile. I found it to be a very funny page. The dated feeling of most of the highlighted memes as they relate to movies, etc., can be fixed in the lede by dating it to a few years ago. Anyway, save. Aleister 20:05 10-9-'13
- P.S. Reread it again, and just changed my mind. Not funny at all, when read as it is written. What I was doing was reading the last lines of a section as made-up comedy. So reverting my vote. Aleister 20:13 same day
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This article is solely here to catalog big Internet memes. The only "humor" it has is to couple a description with our opinion (with no elaboration) that a given meme represents "faggotry." There were 4 votes to keep it in July 2012, none of them with a word of explanation why it deserved to live (beyond "salvageable"). Spıke Ѧ 11:32 10-Sep-13
- Delete. Agreed. According to previous nom, it had been nommed before that. It was outdated a year ago so even more outdated now! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:55, September 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I would expect an article with a title like this to be satirical or funny in some way. This is not. Captain gull (talk) 23:53, September 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:58, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Anton (talk) 15:27, September 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. It lacks humour and content. It barely talks about what "Bro Rape" actually is and as yet I don't know what it means unless it literally means raping a brother or close friend. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:55, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unencyclopedic title; Anal Rape (and Rectal Gestation) funnies; listcruft; what more does it need? Screen name ChadBroChill17 links to Michael Jackson but Google links it to YouTube, Twitter, and Urban Dictionary: vanity. Spıke Ѧ 20:27 9-Sep-13
- Delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:44, September 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Worthless - repeats most of the jokes from the Bro article with the dubious addition of rape. Captain gull (talk) 00:06, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Burninate! This article is dumb and very poor. We need to just remove some of this kind of stuff. The boys are NOT back in town likely at THIS point! Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 21:02, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Clock restarted as nominator was late to tag the article. Spıke Ѧ 20:27 9-Sep-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- I know nothing about the game, but it seems very detailed and encyclopedically has sections of what I take to be the main characters and on other topics. And the point of view of writing a page, I take it, of a lover and a hater of the game (TV show? I dunno what this is) is enough to save it and for people who care to go over it for a polish or two. Aleister 19:05 a very good year
- It's not a game, Aleister; Vocaloid is a teenage singer, Miku, created on the compuetr (saying simply, Miku is a computer program). But she still has many fans and even outside Japan. Anton (talk) 07:12, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, I just found out (from the article) that Miku was not the only Vocaloid. There were many others and that is whom you call "game characters". So the article is not funny, it is informative. Anton (talk) 07:15, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Article is an argument of a vocaloid lover and hater. It also relies too much on “the green war”. Chaoarren (talk) 17:42, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
- BOOMBOT!! This article is, by a little bit, poorly written. They should have done better! Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 18:05, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
- Even though Vocaloid is popular, we need something else. The author could have made fun of Japanese teenagers, who fall in love with a computer program, Japanese culture etc. etc. Anton (talk) 07:12, September 9, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I swept away the bickering quotations, the nagging at the start, and the large section on Wacky War, but I still find it to be Denza writing about another aspect of his own life, with minimal allure to the reader. Spıke Ѧ 11:28 9-Sep-13
- This sucks infinite ass Not just 4 buttholes of the internet. But INFINITY BUTTHOLES! I mean, I used to think this was funny, but that was when I was in 7th grade. I'm a respectable 10th grader now, and I say this needs a better article, which I will try to write post deletion. EAT DELETIONSWORD YE SHIT ARTICLE.--The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 19:52, September 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Respectable? who respects you? I would userspace this to you for rework given the +4 vote, but the article goes back before you and even before your other username, so we need +5 to make it official. You can, of course, try to write a replacement article non-post-deletion, and even renominate this in a month if it survives. Spıke Ѧ 20:22 10-Sep-13
- That was low. ;_; --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 20:35, September 10, 2013 (UTC) (YOU MAKE ME CRY TEARS OF PAIN)#
- Delete. Guess you'll be needing my vote then! Haven't a clue what Denza's on about. In my country grades are scores you receive after doing an exam! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:10, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
- 7th standard, 10th standard. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 18:22, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Still no clue Denza. Over here we have years but for some reason they don't transalate to same numbers as your grades. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:39, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Think middle school and high school. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:17, September 11, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|