From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (2) |
- Weak Keep. It's got a concept and a few jokes, but it's a stub. I think it deserves a slight chance to expand (if anybody pays attention to it). --Gamma287 01:52, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. Per Gamma. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 10:17 May 16, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- That's... um... nice?
1234 ~ 19:26, 12 May 2011
- A pathetic little article, to be sure. pillow talk 18:55, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. foreigncruft. I know nothing whatever about Russian airlines, although one can guess that they probably suck my the standards of the developed world, and said fact isn't particularly funny. --Mn-z 16:48, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh, not quite good enough. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:06, 15 May 2011
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 19:20, 16 May 2011
|
Score: -7
|
Keep (9) |
- Have never looked at this before, and I found it pretty clever, all the variations. A couple stupid quotes could be taken away, yet overall I enjoyed my visit to the page and will write about it in my diary. Aleister 14:35 15-5-'11
- All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy. - Dull Boy all work and no play makes Jack a 16:32, Makes Jack, 2011 (UTC)
- As a good solid reference to that film thing, it has a place here. Current article could use some massive cutting down, however. Although I forgot what the thing it's from is called... >.<
1234 ~ 19:59, 15 May 2011
- Actually part of the joke is not cutting it down, but to have it long, as in the film. It goes on and on. Aleister 21:48 15-5-'11
- In the film, it stays in the same languages and is amusingly formatted, getting more so as it goes. This, if anything, gets less so.
1234 ~ 22:04, 15 May 2011
- WShat??? Of course in the film it stayed in the same language, that's why digressing into long sections of other languages adds satire. Def.keep the other languages, imnho. Maybe some minor pruning but not major pruning? Aleister 6:11 16-5-'11
- Definitely keep! Of course anyone who didn't see the movie will think that sucks. Now, we should cut it after the English stops and other languages follow. Other languages are out of (English) Uncyclopedia's jurisdiction. Mattsnow 22:15, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. per above. --Mn-z 22:16, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Doop doop doop -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:59, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Per all of the above. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:40 May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:00, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
- All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:10, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Could we NOW get a rid of this? I dont like this page. It stinks like AAAAAAAAA! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 13:25, 15 May, 2011 (UTC)
- What a pointless article. Anyone could take any phrase and copy it into a text box a bunch of times then use Google Translate to make it a bunch of different languages. Jack worked too hard on this article and as a result it is dull as all get out. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:19, 15 May 2011
|
Comments |
- What movie is this supposed to be referencing? I must have missed that one. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:23 May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- The Simpsons -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:26, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, I get it now. I kinda figured it was a classic I should have remembered. *Heads over to Netflix* (because my local movie store is absolutely useless). Now, is anyone against me going in and deleting all foreign language text in this article? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:40 May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- I tried to delete some of the 128 Kb article, my PC sucks, I think the article is amazing but we can agree the other languages should be thrown out. (I tried to do it.) Mattsnow 00:05, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Ohhhhhhhhh, ok. Didn't figure that one out. My apologies. I still definitely think it needs trimming though, especially the other languages part. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 00:36, 16 May 2011
- Strangely enough, the article has been sharply pruned since before you posted that comment. Look at it again! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:38, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
- It should be kept. Mattsnow 00:59, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Must have been pruned right after I looked at it. I agree, it's perfect now! ^_^ -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 01:31 May 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Abstain. Ughh... it's tedious, but it looks a lot nicer now... hell, I'll abstain. Even if I did vote delete I wouldn't have made a difference.EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:53, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Tacos.
1234 ~ 16:02, 16 May 2011
|
Score: -5
|
Keep (6) |
- It needs a lot of expanding but really it's not such a bad little idea... -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:14, 15 May 2011
- I agree with snowman. Concept: 10 Current form: 0 Mattsnow 22:17, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- I actually really liked it; not only is it not deletion worthy, I think it's well above average in terms of its humor value. pillow talk 22:49, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. per above. --Mn-z 00:04, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:10, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. --ChiefjusticeWii 10:22, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- I suspect UN:REQ rather failed with this one. On the plus side, the links say it's still there, so...
1234 ~ 09:07, 15 May 2011
|
Comments |
- Uh, guys... it's still listed on Uncyclopedia:Requested Articles. That means the idea's not going anywhere; I'm just calling for the deletion of this particular attempt. Trying to play by the rules, as it were. That'll learn me.
1234 ~ 22:50, 15 May 2011
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- This one was apparently done in 20 minutes, although it's better than most things written the quickly would be... but it's still an unfunny list without any ideas that really follow through.
1234 ~ 08:31, 15 May 2011
- Agree -DeathBySnowman (talk) 14:43, 15 May 2011
- I laughed so much that I think we should get rid of this. It will cause strokes Mattsnow 22:22, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! Quintessential VFD nom. It should go away. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:31 May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 00:05, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Mattsnow 02:50, May 16, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- i can't tell whether this is so awful that it's amazing or that it's just plain awful --Roman Dog Bird 21:40, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- I'ma go with the latter... but what do I know?
1234 ~ 21:46, 14 May 2011
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 22:07, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Bleh --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:47, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Irradiate. Hazardous to the viewer's health. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 00:59 May 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- why are we trolling (fishing term) archival unnews? --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 21:54, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- The recently deleted Rectal Prolapse was linked through this. I took one look at it and decided it wasn't no good. --Roman Dog Bird 22:06, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Also, the article sucks, and we should not keep stuff based on namespace. --Mn-z 22:07, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Not to mention it's crufty, crufty, cruft! It doesn't even qualify as fancruft, considering how I was one of the original Pokemon fans from over ten years ago and I find this abhorrent. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 00:59 May 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (2) |
- My old man is a television repairman, he's got this ultimate set of tools. I can fix it. - Imrealized ...hmm? 16:32, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. The bottom list is problematic. The rest has a few funny bits. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:56, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (0) |
So... I'm confused, not that that's anything new. Unrelatedly, this article isn't very good.
1234 ~ 09:00, 15 May 2011
|
Comments |
- The guy in the fancy hat was correct. He could indeed fix it. O_o And since nobody else went for deletion, I'll just close this thing.
1234 ~ 23:52, 15 May 2011
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Reasonable Stub regardless - such a great topic, I may rework it myself.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:41, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- I would vote delete, but if the Sycamore's cranked up a Tennants: let's paintball! mAttlobster. (hello) 18:22, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. per above, reasonable stub. --Mn-z 23:38, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Take some facts, mix in some random nonsense, and boom... you have some facts mixed with random nonsense.
1234 ~ 19:12, 12 May 2011
- Delete unless Syc upgrades "may rework it myself" to "promise to rework it myself." pillow talk 18:57, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Agree with Hyperbole -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2011
|
Comments |
- With the Tennant's issue at the forefront of the issue and my double vision... the real question is whether you would want me to re-work at this time, and in my sensitive condition?--Sycamore (Talk) 19:36, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- You're pregnant?? Somebody get Mn-z! pillow talk 20:29, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Also, you might want to notify Meganew, Jupiterfox, and possibly Socky while you are at it. --Mn-z 23:38, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Many times has Mnbvcxz wanked over a pregnant Scotsman. I find both situations described troubling;)--Sycamore (Talk) 21:46, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Sycomore, you've got the Kate Bush to kick this puppy into article Nirvana. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:45, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Athlete. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:01, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. I think this is an amusing stub. There could be a nice staring point for a writer here.--Sycamore (Talk) 19:44, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Valid satire, competently written. Its flaws are that it's short and has no pictures, but that can be fixed. pillow talk 18:58, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. valid satire. --Mn-z 16:44, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. needs expanding but this is a good start -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:10, 15 May 2011
- Keep. Stubbish, but a good start. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:46, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Okay?
1234 ~ 19:11, 12 May 2011
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:18, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Hetrosexual? The satire here eludes me. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:34, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! The joke also eludes me (see below). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 05:01 May 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. What is this trying to parody? Some postwar law committee of some sort? HUAC? I don't get it. I could change my vote if someone can explain the joke here. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 05:01 May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. Looks like an attempt to parody the "Homosexual Agenda". If you don't know what that's about, look it up on conservapedia. They know all about it. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:44, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. Hurr, durr, should have realized that. *Wears dunce cap.* -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:45 May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Smirp. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:01, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- I'm not sure what's vandalism here and what's not. o_O
1234 ~ 20:38, 13 May 2011
- Radioactive! Yeech! What was that? --Gamma287 02:22, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:28, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:42, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I couldn't even bear to read the entire article. Utter nonsense. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 14:27, 15 May 2011
|
Comments |
- Usually, if it's IP written, it's vandalism. IPs suck... --Gamma287 18:48, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- I think most of this wound up in Dinosaur, at least at some point. Do we want this, too? No, seriously, do we? I'm asking. That's not rhetorical.
1234 ~ 20:09, 13 May 2011
- Was all set to vote to save it, then opened the page and saw it, so now here I am, playing a banjo and voting to let my dinos go. Aleister 22:22 13-5-'11
- Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:03, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't think this is needed. The first picture has some potential but the article is...eh. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 14:30, 15 May 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- I think it's supposed to be funny how bad it is. But really, it's just bad. And not funny.
1234 ~ 05:45, 14 May 2011
- Burninate! It looks like it was written by someone who just learned swear words and can't quite figure out how to use them. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 05:52, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- SHIT.--Fcukman 14:11, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This could've been an UnNews article, but whoever wrote this happened to be a 'tard. --Gamma287 18:28, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- OH NOES -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 18:33, 14 May 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- This is just bad, in so, so many ways. pillow talk 21:28, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Just not enough here... this has no future. Reckon the topic itself is just not a great place to start from.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:39, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- holy fucking shit are you kidding me --Roman Dog Bird 21:40, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- This isn't even worthy of a delete template because it's that bad. Yeah. I think I'll have some of those images QVFD'd too. --Gamma287 02:30, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- It's a shame because someone obviously put a lot of time into this horrendous article...time that could have been better spent somewhere else. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:37, 14 May 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Blather. The hapless author asked MrN9000 if he could please take it out of the ICU, and that dirty limey didn't stand his ground. pillow talk 18:46, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, that's a turd. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:37, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Radioactive! Need I say more? --Gamma287 18:35, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Per above. --Mn-z 23:16, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. so you're okay with the concept but not the coding? It's good enough, if just barely. Better than some "looks like the thing that it's about" articles I've seen. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:23, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. As a "page that looks like its subject," it's... fine. I guess. pillow talk 18:56, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. per aboves. --Mn-z 23:40, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. per Mnbvcxz. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 00:31, May 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- It's three jpegs of what appears to be text copied from an old revision of the wikipedia page with ads over it. This could work if rendered in hypertext with an actual article behind some positioned ads, mind.
1234 ~ 19:20, 12 May 2011
|
Comments |
- It has a concept besides the ads? Damn, I deleted all those other wikipedia copypastas for nothing...
1234 ~ 01:10, 13 May 2011
1234 ~ 04:55, 15 May 2011
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- I don't know, man, some people want to write a lot of shit about exploding heads. pillow talk 18:39, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.A random, sprawling mess. Unreadable. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:42, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- <insert pun here>
1234 ~ 23:53, 13 May 2011
- Delete. I have the oddest feeling we deleted this before. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:13, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Radioactive! That article nearly caused my head to explode. Two lists with no content to go with it, and randomness running freely through the article made me vomit. -trap door opens- --Gamma287 18:32, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
Keep. I brighten it up with a nice picture and bam it goes of vfd. LOLLIPOP: fix this and give it sum kawk! --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 21:40, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Yer seeyin eet wrayng. Yoo heeve too sey eet layk: Sum cawk. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 02:32, 14 May 2011
|
Delete (5) |
- I've seen better, though perhaps not more elaborate fart jokes.
1234 ~ 19:35, 12 May 2011
- Delete. Family 'Goy' doesn't save the day. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:12, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- An example of a somewhat funny pun trying to stretch itself into an entire article. pillow talk 18:53, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. That'll learn ya' to put pictures on stuff. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:29, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. What? --Gamma287 02:37, May 14, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- There are a couple of sentences of what might be called 'actual article', here. I suppose.
1234 ~ 19:39, 12 May 2011
- BOSTON!!! YEAH!!!! --Roman Dog Bird 20:30, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Nope -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 22:18, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 00:35, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Ick. pillow talk 18:51, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Er... what?
1234 ~ 19:32, 12 May 2011
- a lame article about a funny character from a funny show? you don't say!!!!! --Roman Dog Bird 19:37, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Poor spelling, obscure writing and generally crapped out in a few sittings. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:09, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Per RDB. pillow talk 18:54, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
#Automatic Lyrithya nomination Keep. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:38, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- I love boring lists.
1234 ~ 19:09, 12 May 2011
- Delete Actually...when you come to read it. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:40, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Bleah. pillow talk 00:32, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:19, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Anal+Isis=Crap. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:04, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep This is funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:41, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Very Keep. very nice...--Sycamore (Talk) 19:42, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Thanks for pointing this out, very good page. Aleister 20:32 12-5-'11
- Weak keep. I... don't entirely understand this, but nonetheless I don't entirely hate it either. pillow talk 19:00, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Some nutty theories are hilarious, but this just... what?
1234 ~ 19:06, 12 May 2011
- Delete. Needs a lot of fixing and strengthening of the core concept. Should not get away without a fix tag. --Count of Monkey Crisco 21:49, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:53, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep Although underdeveloped with some crap bits, this is amusing. . mAttlobster. (hello) 16:41, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. per above and hope of a rewrite. --Mn-z 23:41, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. This was nice article. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 10:46, 13 May, 2011 (UTC)
- Not nearly so bad as a lot of them.
1234 ~ 17:24, 13 May 2011
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Poopie -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 09:10, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Weak Delete. In its current poopy condition, scrapping and rewriting it sounds like a better option to me. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:44 May 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I dunno how much of the present stuff is savable, but Matt likes it, and since this is an article which should surely be on Uncy, maybe a few people should add to it. I'll do a few minutes, and maybe Romartus, and of course SPIKE, ah, wait, never mind. (hint, SPIKE used to live in Pakistan, had lots of free time and three wives!) Aleister 19:37 12-5-'11
- *Orchestral music.
Snake? Spike? What's wrong? Spike! SPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIKE!!!!.... *Choose "continue," gunshot echoes. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:44 May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Kept -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:52, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. Reckon this is a nice starting project... some good idea in there.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:56, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. CRAP (nomination) mAttlobster. (hello) 16:43, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. CARP --Mn-z 23:38, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. CARPE DIEM (see below) -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:06 May 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. CRAP -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 04:02, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It's always preferable to expand your reasons beyond "CRAP" for nominating someone else's work for deletion.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:56, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Actually, I rather like this one, despite all its zaniness. Oh yeah, and seize the day. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:06 May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Glark.
1234 ~ 17:23, 13 May 2011
|
Score: 9
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (9) |
- If you want random, this is quite, but beyond that there does not appear to be anything here.
1234 ~ 19:00, 12 May 2011
- Horrible. This is what VFD is all about. Aleister 20:35 12-5-'11
- suck my ding-a-ling (please) --Roman Dog Bird 20:47, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 21:55, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 23:45, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Please dismiss Mr. TM, Janice. I don't want him to ruin my carpet with his ignorance and stupidity. --Gamma287 01:55, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! Trademarks and copyrights are destroying America indeed, but this is not the way to get the point across. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:10 May 13, 2011 (UTC)
- My cat told me to. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 10:45, 13 May, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:20, May 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Someone there has bad memory... +score after you, anyone you ever was, votes. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 10:45, 13 May, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -6
|
Keep (6) |
- Strong keep. Oh my God, this is great. I'll do some work on it. Thanks for finding it. Aleister 19:33 12-5-'11
- Keep Another great nomination. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:46, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Fantastic nomination! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:13, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- WHERE HAS THIS ARTICLE BEEN ALL MY LIFE --Roman Dog Bird 20:46, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh my god. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:47, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. This is pretty good. Not nonsense for sure. It's a parody of the Muhammad Ali vs, "Smoking" Joe Frazier rivalry from the 1970's. Instead it replaces Joe Frazier with Frasier Crane, the self important psychologist from Cheers and the self titles spin-off show and Muhammad Ali with old Muhammad Ali and his years of compounded dementia pugilistica. It's not a strong concept at first appearance but it's developed as well as it can be with no fluff or randumbo. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:13, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (0) |
This appears to be some sort of nonsense fight thingy.
1234 ~ 19:28, 12 May 2011
|
Comments |
- A great page. Only thing is it's so good I'm checking for plagerism (Playdoh put it up with one edit, complete, usually a bad sign if prior edits don't include user space edits), but can't find any by googling. Anyone else want to try to find a stolen page? The pic was taken from somewhere too, so wondering if an article is attached to the original pic. Am adding some edits to the present page, and he had a round two that I'll put back in. Aleister 20:00 12-5-'11
- The picture is apparently an Uncyclopedia original. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:16, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- It had a copyright tag on it, but maybe. I've changed the telling of the fight to fit real-world data, and didn't retrieve round-two. Aleister 20:18 12-5-'11
- Right, really not sure why I nominated this...
1234 ~ 01:13, 13 May 2011
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- This is not very good. (But the Rhymenocerous is very good.) pillow talk 12:45, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- I like the cauliflower. We have much better ads, though.
1234 ~ 23:24, 11 May 2011
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 23:55, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- Now listen up, here's the story about a little Serb who got pissed off at his ISP. So he came on Uncyclopedia and posted some porn along with an incoherent rant. pillow talk 12:30, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- I think it likes itself.
1234 ~ 23:27, 11 May 2011
- Delete. UN:N about Serbian ISP, or Serbia for that matter, or the Balkans for matter. --Mn-z 23:43, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Yeah... it wishes. pillow talk 12:50, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Well, it is rather ironic...
1234 ~ 23:22, 11 May 2011
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 00:03, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. My sides declined to ache after reading this.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:28, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It talks a lot about being funny in a very encyclopedic tone. Unfortunately, it isn't funny itself. --Scofield 15:06, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- One time, I walked in on my roommate while he was masturbating. And that was pretty masturbatory. But it wasn't as masturbatory as Invasion of Uncyclopedia. pillow talk 12:35, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Fuck all this shit. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:49, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes.
1234 ~ 23:26, 11 May 2011
- Delete. any article that mentions uncyclopedia, or any wiki, or any website, waging war should be deleted immediately. --Mn-z 23:47, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- eat me --Roman Dog Bird 01:24, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- This article is really not about anything at all. pillow talk 12:23, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- No words can describe it. Aleister 12:59 11-5-'11
- Nothing is better. By which I mean nothing as a thing.
1234 ~ 23:29, 11 May 2011
- Delete. worse than I expected. It could have been clever word-play if it wasn't 95% random rabbit trailing. --Mn-z 23:38, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:02, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (9) |
- Feature! --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 23:00, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Hahahahaaha -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:16, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. See also: Euroipods --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 03:48 May 10 2011
- Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 15:04, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Although poorly spelt, keep this -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 21:51, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Better than a redlink, but should not discourage a rewrite. We should have a real article on Planned Parenthood. I'd vote "Delete" if there were something to replace it with. pillow talk 17:52, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- bandwagon keep also, pregnancy related. --Mn-z 23:30, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Weak keep. I completely agree with Hyperbole. It's a good stub that saves us a red link. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:35 May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- never --Roman Dog Bird 01:25, May 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. If this doesn't get deleted, I'm still going to
put a fix tag on it sit around and do nothing... --Gamma287 22:53, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Huh? Aleister 00:10 10-5-'11
- Delete. Too long, could be replaced by just one word: No. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:05, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. TL;DR Mattsnow 11:10, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. What the fuck is wrong with you people? ...Never mind -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 15:16, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- This might be funny if it was true. Except it's not even that.
1234 ~ 16:54, 11 May 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: -9
|
Keep (13) |
- very much a keep -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:17, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Like Hell. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:17, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I don't normally vote on VFD, but God is this funny.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 01:35, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. (talk) 02:45, 11 May 2011
- Kep --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 04:59, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- grrrrrrrrr *poop* --Roman Dog Bird 05:04, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Weak keep A weak smile occured. Mattsnow 11:22, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- kiep when you want too take way this page you show you hate god n are bad person. Godd will cough on you when you dye so dont try to take cough midicene with you. Alstir 11:53 11-5-'11 loook theres tree levens
- Keep Our 60 year old earth needs it. This is not saying Christians are stupid just that the more fundementalist stop using their brains when observation disagrees with their location based beliefs. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:36, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- By George, I think Matt's got it! Thanks for a good post and insight. Maybe I'll go back and work on it some more (started by the 92 vandal, then I and others added to it (the 92 vandal and I actually have a feature together!). Aleister 14:38
- Painfully Obvious Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:16, 11 May 2011
- Aye.
1234 ~ 23:31, 11 May 2011
- Keep. per above. --Mn-z 23:36, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- hrmm Gen. Fudgem0bile Set nuns on fire. Go straight to heaven. 23:33, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm a Christian, and I can still type. Yes, I get the purpose, but anything written this badly (even on purpose) should be deleted for lack of proper syntax and grammar. The Grammar Nazi hath spoken! --Gamma287 01:48, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. Per Gamma. Nothing but stereotypical nonsense--and not the good kind, either. As a member of the Humorless Delete Squad, I hereby vote to burninate. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 05:33 May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This is a Zzzzzer..--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:06, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- If you're going to go around trying to delete funny articles that people have spend a lot of effort on, don't cry the victim when someone tells you to fuck off! mAttlobster. (hello) 14:38, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Will you kindly stop telling people to fuck off for voicing their opinions? If they don't find something funny, they don't find it funny, but if enough other people like it, it'll still get kept, anyhow.
1234 ~ 16:47, 11 May 2011
- You're taking the morale high-ground on VFD? You're one of the worst. In fact if you look back through my history, I'm not exactly blameless either. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:33, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- What has morale got to do with this? Although I'll have you know I'm of particularly low morale; I'm a very unhappy person.
1234 ~ 18:48, 11 May 2011
- That was such a bad spelling mistake, I concede defeat. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:54, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- It seems I overstepped a boundary. My apologies if my words were offensive; I didn't mean to give rise to any hard feelings. I never took your words as offensive (no one is supposed to take anything seriously here), I always think of this sort of thing as a kind of facetiously sporting jest. Kind of like a back and forth of "You suck." ... "No, you suck!" ... "No, you suck!" and then we all laugh about it and go for ice cream.
- As for the article, I simply don't see the humor in it. Still, since a super-majority is required to have something deleted (and I'm clearly in the minority), my vote here won't affect anything; and rightfully so. I agree that if enough people find an article decent, it should be kept. I really wouldn't want it any other way.
- Anyhow, we're all Uncyclopedians; peace! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:28 May 11, 2011 (UTC) 23:28, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- You suck.
1234 ~ 23:31, 11 May 2011
- That was easy.
- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 00:03 May 12, 2011 (UTC)
1234 ~ 23:48, 11 May 2011
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Typial ramblings about what it is "believed" Armenians are trying to do. No sense, no satire. --Black Flamingo 22:16, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 02:46, 11 May 2011
- Not funny. pillow talk 22:47, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Meh.
1234 ~ 23:04, 11 May 2011
- Delete. sorta like antisemitism, but about nationalities nobody cares about. --Mn-z 23:32, May 11, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Um... what?
1234 ~ 08:08, 10 May 2011
- Delete. Nadgers. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:55, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:23, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! All-around cruft. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 11:49 May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Decent idea, but poor execution. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:52, 10 May 2011
- Burninate! Another escapee of the ICU tag -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 21:46, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Just bad writing... and not really funny, either.
1234 ~ 03:32, 10 May 2011
- Delete. Nothin' doing here.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:56, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.... but I totally call dibs on rewriting this either way.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:22, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:15, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- nope -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 21:48, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Calling a game a torture device might work, but this is just boring. The image is probably the best thing it has, which has apparently nothing to do with the rest of it.
1234 ~ 03:05, 10 May 2011
- Delete. Linked to the Richard Garfield article. Seems to have no connection to the mathematician of the same name. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:00, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Have any of you actually played this game? I'm just wondering because I think it's great. No, seriously. Not the article, the actual game. The article isn't at all funny and doesn't even begin to do the game justice. The pictures are like movement cards from the game, but obviously they have different things photoshopped onto them. So yes, delete it, but delete it with a little bit of knowledge about the game and realizing that, if done correctly, an Uncyclopedia page about this game COULD be as good as the Stratego article. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:58, 10 May 2011
- Delete. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 21:48, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. Needs work not huffing. Also, 'no images' = {{Sofixit}}--Sycamore (Talk) 20:58, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- done--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 04:28, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. The answer is no. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 22:35, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Not a gem, but not a trainwreck Mattsnow 11:14, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Sure. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:51, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- No final solution for this, you racists. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 17:53, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Burninate! Shoddy writing, no pictures, and red links galore.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:01, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Now with two images--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 04:28, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Could probably be done better, but meh - I can't be fucked, can anyone else? I'm surprised it wasn't huffed ages ago, really. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 17:17, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! Meaningless drivel. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 19:30, 9 May 2011
Burninate! Pseudo-mathematic bunk. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 00:43 May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Not anything in the end. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:09, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This is really bad -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 21:52, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'm going to be sorely disappointed with Uncyclopedia is this actually gets deleted. Google "Jewish Problem" for some context, and if you want your search history to brand you as a neo-nazi. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 03:58, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll change my vote to Abstain. I was thinking about this, and I figure it's actually quite well written. It just needs more... funny. And it needs to make sense to non-math majors. I'm not qualified, as I've studied far too much liberal arts to make sense of those equations. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 04:14 May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Does it really need to make sense to non-math types? I don't find Geology funny but it gets a lot of traffic and appreciation from geologists. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 04:35, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. its just as funny as Channel_31_(Australia) --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 00:39, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- When I first found this from clicking the Random Page-thing, I tough that this is about a channel. But all I can see, is a small introduction about the channel, and the rest of it is pictures about fishes. Eh? Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 14:57, 9 May, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, but it makes me sad doing s... Order now for our crazy price of just $400,000,000,000 plus postage and handling. OK, kill that motherfucker.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:01, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I read the first twenty words or so before thinking, "Ah. It's that sort of article." Kill. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 17:25, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- What? -DeathBySnowman (talk) 19:28, 9 May 2011
- Delete. (talk) 21:04, 9 May 2011
|
Comments |
- But don't you have to add the {{VFD}} tag or else the vote doesn't count?--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:01, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes. I'm too lazy to close this thing, though, so I added it myself and reset the timer. *shifty eyes*
1234 ~ 18:18, 9 May 2011
- Oh shit. So I forgot it again. Cat the Colourful is very sorry Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 04:56, 10 May, 2011 (UTC)
- would it help to move it to a new page called Channel 31 Fish Cam? I wrote the article about the off-air program the channel used to show... like when some channels go off air they had a white dot, or some showed a test pattern, some even show a weather chart etc... well Channel 31 would show a fish tank, it was a live feed at first, till people complained, and they often just had a fish tank with no fish and other times dead fish would often be floating around for hours, and you'd see it again the next night when they replayed the exact same footage... they only seemed to update the footage to a new fish tank every 2 weeks or so [info here]. So thats more what this article was about... I could write more about C31 if given the chance, but if it really bothers you so much that deletion is a must, so be it.---Maniac1075Complain Here 02:48, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (1) |
- Weak keep It's kind of amusing if you look it as a brochure written by someone who doesn't know what they're talking about. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 01:25, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Baleete Not badly written, but not funny either. Mattsnow 07:30, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Just your everyday sort of unfunnystupidbad article. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:20, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Maybe it's just me, but I don't see any jokes. It's not funny at all. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 19:32, May 9, 2011
- Kill or {{fix}}, but that would probably kill it too.
1234 ~ 17:55, 10 May 2011
|
Comments |
- Meh. It's in a rather sad state, and it's just begging to be killed off. Still, the quality of the writing itself makes me think it passes with a D-, so... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 04:29 May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (5) |
- Meh. Not bad enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:06, 9 May 2011
- Keep. It's not too bad up to the nonsense about the Third Solar System War. I might be interested in attempting a revision. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 19:36, 9 May 2011
- Keep. Per DeathBySnowman wanting to breath LifeBySnowman into the page. Aleister 00:05 10-5-'11
- Keep Chuck Norris is awesome! mAttlobster. (hello) 16:16, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:03, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete., two paragraphs of unfunny -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 07:40, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- I could write something better. I doubt I ever will, but I could, and that's saying something, considering how awful I tend to be at it.
1234 ~ 22:31, 8 May 2011
- Radioactive! I only found one joke in that entire page. This is a pitiful disgrace... --Gamma287 11:28, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. It's a hard subject to write about and it sort of works at first. That mini wacky war bit really drags it down though. I'm undecided. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:49, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|