From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- That is the first time I've used the username template. I'm not abusing it. --Dexter111344 17:41, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- I don't see what's so bad with it. Sure the second to last paragraph "drifts" a bit, and the last one is bad, but the idea is there. Also, Tkf, I am the biggest Hebrew on this site. Rwoaar!. I assume that's the sound that an enormous Hebrew would make. I haven't seen a lot of Jewish sci-fi, admittedly. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:44, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- I thought Black Jesus and White Jesus were the biggest Hebrew's on the site... --Dexter111344 18:13, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Can't really see why this is on here. The Oblong Lobster 12:19, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep A bit dumb, some cliche Jewish satire, but not bad enough to delete. Sir Roger 00:46, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - not too bad, but a rewrite sometime would be good. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:38, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep for "The Hebrew alphabet (Hebrew, alephbeth) is set apart from all other alphabets and wanders about in a strange land." --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:49, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete by request of the biggest Hebrew on the site. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:26, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- I'm very much flattered. ~ 21:25, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 08:56, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Dexter111344 17:33, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It's kind of boring. Frankie! 20:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'll clarify - this is informative article on Hebrew - most of it is a Hebrew grammar lesson, which isn't accurate as well. It's really is a Wikipedia stuff more then Uncync. ~ 20:54, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Inaccurate? The heck, you say. So, the letter "delete" doesn't really sound like "gargoyle"? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:10, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- The letter Zayin, which is the Hebrew Z also means penis. Now there is a practical language for you. ~ 07:36, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Note to self: Don't ever meet the Jewish Zorro. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:55, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 11:49, 22 Jul 2007
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete From Lounge. For an article about a ninja, Chuck Norris appears an awful lot here. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:21, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 08:53, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Chuck Norris is on this article 13 times. Including his two quotes right at the top. Mr. T is on there a few times, too. And despite Mr. T's and Chuck Norris's greatnest, this article sucks. --Dexter111344 18:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Fucking kill it Frankie! 20:22, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:00, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Matt, do you have a sexually active relationship or at least any kind of social life? Keep.--TravisBatos 20:16, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- No. The Oblong Lobster 17:25, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Just randomnees of the weakest order. The Oblong Lobster 18:48, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 08:52, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete whilst also fearing that this will be recreated and end up being even worse. --Dexter111344 19:34, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 20:26, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
So, what terrible shred of humor of redirection will this one take when it's sadly deleted by morons? Perhaps Bruce Lee? Or Mr. T? Chuck Norris is already taken by the late Big Boss.--TravisBatos 20:38, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Last line - "That, however, did not stop the human Crustaens from angrily waving their swords at the ocean, tossing bottles into the sea, and leaving garbage on the beach after a party." Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yes Keep. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:18, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Very weak keep & I mean very weak. --Dexter111344 16:37, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep The odd fun line I suppose. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and rewrite - it has possibilities and there are worse "articles" to deal with. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 11:55, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 19:46, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP It's a good idea and it very nearly works. The Oblong Lobster 12:17, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Semi-procedural delete as nominator. I say semi-procedural because the related page Other brackety thing was deleted at QVFD. The contents of the pages are basically {{:Left-wing}}{{alphabet}} and {{:Right-wing}}{{alphabet}} respectively, but by checking Brackety thing's history, this was apparently Keitei's idea, so I feel this needs a full discussion. --Pentium5dot1 01:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Dexter111344 01:09, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:40, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Huff --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:09, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 02:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Why not. Let's clear up another one off Short Pages. Good work with the template Pentium. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't do anything for me. Doesn't even smile.The Oblong Lobster 19:14, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 08:49, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:34, 20 July 2007
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep I thought it was quite good. Did my usual trick of giving it a good scalping - see if that looks any better now...? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:07, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Uncyc's in a good way if today's offerings of deletion bait are anything to go by. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 03:33, 20 July 2007
- Strong Keep so it needs some rehab - this is an easy rewrite - and the concept is very good. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 11:58, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft, Randomcruft --General Insineratehymn 00:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Just because those people are mediocre, doesn't mean this article should be. The article should be funny, not boring. Also, don't forget the redirect. --Dexter111344 16:51, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Huff --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:10, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 02:47, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:39, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete One of the most boring things I've ever read. Sir Roger 23:47, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- It's not great, but it's not crap. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think it should stay/To delete it would be gay. That rhymes, so it must be true. ThisIsMyUsername 04:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Like Wikipedia's article on him, it must be improved. --Dexter111344 16:29, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep Frankie! 02:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The article is a perfect example of satire - the irony of it - and evidently lost on some people - is that Ted McGinley isn't Larry Olivier and the article is as entertaining as Ted McGinley's career has been. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:02, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I'm taking Prettiest's word for it that I just don't get it. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:35, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Let's see you write an original shaggy dog story as good as this one then. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:54, 18 Jul 2007
- Strong keep -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:21, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - And move to Illogicopedia. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:13, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep It's a good story, and probably the longest and therefore best shaggy dog story you're ever likely to find to put on this page. I don't particularly care if it is plagiarised (we seem to make the odd exception, with acknowledgement). This hasn't got acknowledgement on the actual page yet (although it is on the talk page courtesy of me), but it comes from the "longest joke in the world" page, where I believe it is an original and not very old - I'm sure if the authors knew about us they'd agree to have it up here. So basically, I think at least we should keep until someone thinks of a better one, if such a thing exists! Oh and also, this story reminds me of the time I took the bus to Ogdenville, which in those days was called Nash-county. You could get their for a sixpence with enough over to... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep 'Tis funny. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 02:27, 20 July 2007
Strong Keep Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:03, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Long, ugly, and plagiarized (see its talk page for details). --General Insineratehymn 00:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Down with plagiarism! Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- As much as I'd like there to be at least a few shaggy dog pages on Uncyc, I'd rather they be original shaggy dog stories. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:30, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Long, boring, plagerized all-in-one! And for an added bonus, we'll throw in a crappy, unfunny punchline! --Dexter111344 16:14, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, um...it's a shaggy dog story, eh. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 02:52, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete If it wasn't copied from another site then I'd vote keep. But it isn't so I wont. The Oblong Lobster 19:11, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Only original work on Uncyclopedia, please. Sir Roger 00:37, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Also, I can't believe you used "long" as a reason for deletion. Perhaps you'd also like to delete AAAAAAAAA! because it contains the letter A? • Spang • ☃ • talk • 04:56, 18 Jul 2007
- AAAAAAAAA! is funny. This article is not. --General Insineratehymn 18:31, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- If it goes (which it shouldn't) Spang you can at least sub the contents into that forum topic it's in. You know, so as not to create any red links or anything. But to be honest, the fact that it's templated from there might be reason enough to keep it. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:18, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- If we don't have a policy about plagiarism, we should. As I understand, it's a copyright violation unless it's a relatively short, referenced quote. I doubt it's legal for us to keep this; anthing like this should be deleted on sight. Sir Roger 15:21, 22 July 2007 (UTC)
- You'll notice that even the site it supposedly came from says they "found it". They lay no claim to it. This joke is in fact all over the place. I'm guessing it's as much plagiarism as "why did the chicken cross the road?" is - just a lot longer. Things like this are usually passed around, and extended as they are passed on, and eventually build up to the size it is. Meaning there's probably no single author, most of those authors are anonymous and untraceable, and also meaning that such a thing is quite at home on a wiki. It's not a bad thing that it at least ended up here. If someone thinks they can write a better one, by all means go ahead and do it. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 11:10, 22 Jul 2007
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- The article was CVPed, now we must get rid of all its subpages. --General Insineratehymn 00:46, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed we must. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:22, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Obv. For -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:19, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Dexter111344 16:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Huff --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:01, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 02:56, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Yeah, might as well stomp out the last of them. If any of you guys are watching, you might like to try Encyclopedia Dramatica, I suppose... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:41, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete They're amazingly awful. The Oblong Lobster 18:45, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:46, 19 July 2007
- Delete. -- Mitch 08:48, 20 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep and tag with sciencyness. Seeing as how this sort of thing is my trade, if this proves unpopular I'm going to be morally obliged to rewrite this and save it. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
Weak Keep or Merge with Gravity per Strange but Untrue's comments. Supersedes my delete vote. Pentium5dot1 21:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, just merge with Gravity (and let SbU work on that process). Allow a rewrite of the page about the topic suggested by Dexter111344. Pentium5dot1 00:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Move to SbU's userspace Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - As a physics student, I find these things funny. Pity me. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:23, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and just tidy up formatting, add a picture or two. Doesn't need too much work IMO ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 11:36, 19 July 2007
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- If I don't get a chance to look at it soon and it's for the chop, sling it to the old userspace, then and I'll see what I can do. I feel the humble graviton should have an article besides Gravity. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:33, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- There is also a much crappier article titled Gravitons.
That needs to be either deleted or boldly redirected, since it doesn't have enough content to be worth merging. Pentium5dot1 05:57, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
- Kept, and merge it if you want. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 11:16, 22 Jul 2007
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- commiecruft, 2006cruft, bad Transformer's jokes, and stupidity make this a great article to delete. --Dexter111344 00:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - killer froggy, just write it from scratch. Sir Roger 22:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and I agree with Rogpyvbc. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - LONG LIVE ZIONIST MOTHERLAND!! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:24, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 03:06, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Offensive and nowhere near funny enough to justify its existence. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 13:26, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Blech. "Maybe if I just say pedophile over and over, it'll be funny." --SirIsaac 13:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:52, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Too pious. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Dexter111344 16:42, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 18:43, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Fire at will! JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 23:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Eww. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:03, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 02:38, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete I was gunna just nom this, but after another look, it really does suck bad enough for banishment. It might be worth an expand or rewrite tag, but I don't think so. --THINKER 05:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Blech. Somebody get this guy 5 CCs of Spellcheck, stat! --SirIsaac 13:35, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Chuck Norris is in the group twice. It's mainly a list of random celebrities and boob-related heroes. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 13:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:49, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- The Super Friends were cool. This article is just crap. --Dexter111344 16:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 18:45, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - We already have Unoriginal. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 02:40, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete One of the stars of Big Bang Comics, whose heroes had better not be indestructible, because they're all going to find their way onto here in the next week or so. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 15:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Roger 21:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Overly crappy, not Overly British. --Dexter111344 22:55, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Knight Watchman: An admin with the rank of KUN or greater staying up all night to huff IPcruft. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:17, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 02:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete You couldn't make it up. Well maybe you could - I can't be bothered to find out. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 13:02, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 15:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Roger 21:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Why was this never ICU'd? Oh well. Doesn't matter. It's gonna get deleted soon anyway. --Dexter111344 22:49, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Why you so Stupid?! - You no hungry for Monkey Blower, You hungry for... HOT POCKET! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 00:19, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
- What the fuck is this? Frankie! 03:02, 19 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I was surprised to learn that this was not, in fact, from 2005. Nevertheless, Delete. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:36, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete What, did the admins miss it when they check new articles? Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 06:08, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete /me mentally ICU tags this with the "random" sub, despite being about a year too late. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 15:06, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 19:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Red links for everyone! Yay! --Dexter111344 22:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete, as per lounge request. A game like this deserves a much better article and surely not this mess. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:19, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Normally I'd say: "Keep, because if we we strike it down it will come back far more terrible than we could possibly imagine." However, I suspect this is already roughly as bad as it's getting. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:18, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 15:05, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Nobody seems to put ANY effort into video game articles. The Oblong Lobster 18:04, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is crap. It can't get worse. --Dexter111344 22:33, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Give it a quick and painless death --General Insineratehymn 22:35, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah. Good game. Bad article. De-1337. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:46, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:16, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, but without prejudice against recreation as a different subject (e.g. Mega Man's robot-dog helper). Pentium5dot1 05:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 15:03, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, unless something funny could be done such as merging it with Rush Limbaugh. Spikebrennan 21:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Great band, terrible article. --General Insineratehymn 21:45, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Dexter111344 22:40, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Rush rocks! FUCK WHOEVER WROTE THIS ARTICLE. FUCK THEM IN THEIR DELETE. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft, Vanitycruft --General Insineratehymn 19:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE Reading that made me cry. The Oblong Lobster 22:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Dexter111344 22:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 02:48, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Fucking kill it Frankie! 04:30, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not sure which Leroy Brown it's about, which is always a good indicator of badness... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Vanitycruft --General Insineratehymn 19:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Murder! Murder! Murder! And kill! Kill! Kill! --Dexter111344 21:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- DELETE I'll be honest I didn't read it all. But I read enough. The Oblong Lobster 22:41, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 02:47, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete--Scott 03:10, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Standardly unfunny forum or website thing. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep I don't see the problem here. --THINKER 04:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- It's not crap. A bit random, perhaps, but so is my sock drawer. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:32, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and ban Deathwatch. He's doing this because I put him on Ban Patrol. Fucking jackass. --Dexter111344 04:34, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep How come no one has nominated "Man gets stuck in dogflap" instead of this? --SirIsaac 20:16, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I quite like it. The Oblong Lobster 20:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Should have been deleted in March. --Dexter111344 00:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:02, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Don't know why it should have been deleted in March. Maybe it just feels like March would be more appropriate for deleting such an article. I think we need to just take a big gulp of air and whack this dead cat in the month of July. This July. The one right now...NOW!The Oblong Lobster 22:46, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Check the history and you'll see why. --Dexter111344 23:50, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep I don't know why I like it; I certainly don't understand it, but it's bin. The Oblong Lobster 22:35, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Worst sex joke ever. --Dexter111344 04:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:03, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete As if it wasn't bad enough, a Russian Reversal piece of goat-crap is slotted in by some lazy monkey-spooner. The Oblong Lobster 22:53, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as nominator. If you want an article on an individual DDR song, it needs to be a more notable one, and it needs to be done much better. Otherwise, just see the main DDR article. Pentium5dot1 01:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Roger 01:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Craplist coming from the guy that loves lists... --Dexter111344 01:31, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Wow... Uh. Yeah. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, really dumb list. ----OEJ 01:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Man, that was fast. Thank you for keeping Uncyclopedia clean. (The article has already been deleted as of this comment.) Pentium5dot1 05:54, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep The content was quite good although it was rather ranty. I did a little restyling, and I think it's better now. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:12, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Techcruft --Dexter111344 00:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Bad. Very bad --Pangusto 06:55, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:59, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:01, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete The author really did seem quite angry about 320x200 pictures. Resolution rage! The Oblong Lobster 22:48, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Herocruft & 2006cruft --Dexter111344 00:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, picless, not very coherent. ----OEJ 01:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Bad jokes. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:52, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:11, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:00, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Countrycruft Pure and utter crap. --Dexter111344 00:44, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Could be good, but definitely isn't. ----OEJ 01:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:13, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It could of been better.--Scott 13:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Pure cock. The Oblong Lobster 22:51, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Vanity -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:30, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- So you want to be a sweet MC, in the 3-1-3? None of these skills that you about to see come free. Oh, and delete. --Dexter111344 01:14, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Holy hamhocks, Batman, that is the worst excuse for an article I have seen in a long time. ----OEJ 01:29, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- De1337 --General Insineratehymn 06:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Someone tried to QVFD it today, and, quite frankly, I was tempted. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Zombie, you should have. --Dexter111344 01:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Well, it's awfully long for QVFD. But the writing is bad and the article is not funny or intelligently satirical. ----OEJ 01:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 06:12, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:39, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Deathwatch did create the page(therefore, he is the original author), but the most of the article was written by a different author. It still isn't funny, --Dexter111344 17:07, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Orders of solicitor Rod Dadak.--Deathwatch2006 05:03, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I don't care if anyone thinks it's salvageable. The original author posted this on here(even if it is just out of spite) and really should have been put on QVFD. Oh, and it's crap. Keep the part that's in cunnilingus.--Dexter111344 20:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Okay - can I remove Aer Lingus from here? --Deathwatch2006 05:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC).
- Oh, I don't know, abstain. Just stop being so petulant, Deathwatch - one minute you decide your stuff is brilliant and it needs to be in ten places at once, and the next you want to delete every last scrap. This has happened twice now and I'm fed up of dealing with it. Like I've said, you can be funny if you stop concentrating on things that bother you, like Rochdale, and you don't go over the top. I think that the bit of this that is also a section of cunnilingus is very good, the rest of it maybe tries a bit too hard. But I won't vote on it because you're annoying me and I think my judgement is a bit off as a result. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 07:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- You're only obeying orders.--Deathwatch2006 11:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Wow. You managed to annoy Sbu. She's the closest thing we have to a teddy bear! Button eyes and a little bowtie and everything. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:40, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds familiar.--Deathwatch2006 03:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think she might be a furry. This would explain why I keep seeing her at the meetings. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- A furry is someone who says and does exactly as he is told, and lies about it?--Deathwatch2006 04:44, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Furry. Also, what? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't want to deal with your abuse. I've heard most of it before, verbatim.--Deathwatch2006 07:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- I've been abusive? Sorry, Mr. 2006, but I'm going to have to call shenanigans on that one. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:55, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yes.--Deathwatch2006 08:04, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Hey everybody! Vote Deathwatch! --THINKER 09:45, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Update: User banned for two years by somebody or other. Let that be a lesson to somebody else or other about something or other. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
- By the way, I think he thinks I'm this solicitor guy Rod Dadak. In case that helps clear up any confusion. Poor guy suffers from sleep apnea according to his website, which is probably why he looks a bit loopy at first glance. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:09, 16 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Cut and paste some of OEJ's comments on those other articles right here. I hear he's a snooker though, which sounds.. interesting.. --THINKER 00:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Oh, and that's a bad miss... [/joke that very very few people will get] -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:05, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- MISS MISS MISS MISSS MISS MISS *Article dies* Yes, that's from Trauma Center. No, the "misses" don't mean women. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 05:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:34, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Yuck. ----OEJ 12:23, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- I don't see what any of this has to do with Peter Ebdon. This sucks. -- Hindleyite Converse 15:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 20:04, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ol' Fashion Delete --Dexter111344 20:33, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep ...But there isn't more than one of this particular one. Keep per those of us who like a little chuckle at the meta-humoury not-quite-articles. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:02, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I didn't write it, so you are free to keep it.--Deathwatch2006 03:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 05:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep pending conversion to a fake redirect like those located at Recursion and Double Redirect. A little consistency is nice. -- Pentium5dot1 05:51, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Frankie! 20:08, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Dexter111344 20:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Mildly paradoxical, too. Sir Roger 06:09, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:15, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete There's already too many of these sorts of pages. Undeleted and listed here on Sbu's request. --Algorithm 00:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep, but lose the Prostitution section. Which is what I said to my choir. Hardest thing I ever had to do. Now they're out on the street... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:13, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete One more. The author has been sticking that "Prostitution" section anywhere he can find, and I'm sick of deleting it from random articles. It also pushed this one over the edge to extreme awfulness. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- No This is just crap. --Dexter111344 20:46, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Just stupid. Sir Roger 06:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 07:17, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Thanks, but please see my talk page.--Deathwatch2006 04:01, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Casper the friendly ghost it ain't. Crudecruft. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:41, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- No. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 05:11, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:32, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- "Is that suppose to be a mound of semen?" That is one of the best Oscar Wilde quotes I've read, though. It's not enough to save it. --Dexter111344 20:42, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Long, detailed articles on manga are bad. This is worse. ----OEJ 00:22, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 07:41, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 10:13, 15 July 2007
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete A little funless misinformation about Bawls. Or cojones. Or something. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:21, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously a semidecent writer without the ability to be funny. Saddens me in a way. --THINKER 02:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Bawlete Were they trying to write about the energy drink? --Dexter111344 21:38, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short and not funny. ----OEJ 00:16, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 07:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:28, 15 July 2007
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep...The article is written in bad English, but Wickedpedia has article on him. I favor more articles on foreign politicians. Americans think Rudy Giuliani is all hawt and sexy, but other countries have public figures too ya know. (Will rewrite article on demand...) ----OEJ 00:31, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Mystifying acrocruft. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I guess it's a rant against a Lithuanian politician - it doesn't even do well at being very insulting though. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:39, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:29, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- We're sorry, but the funny you were looking for could not be found. Please check the article and try again. If you need help, call up 911 and quit bothering us. Thank you, and have a bad day. --Dexter111344 21:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 07:49, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:27, 15 July 2007
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep Someone may care to turn the article into something worthwhile. "Do you know who my father is," arises because the brunette discovered her father as a result of her fame, an officer in Hitler's Army.--Deathwatch2006 06:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Short, unfocused, unnecessary. Stub-tagged but never expanded. ----OEJ 22:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Huff Too short. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:08, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 08:54, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Undictionary??? Yes, no, maybe so? --Dexter111344 21:19, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:29, 15 July 2007
|
Comments |
- This can now be found in Undictionary. Thank you for shopping at Uncyclopedia, your source for the
crappiest best content in the world. --Dexter111344 20:50, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Underdeveloped: short, marginally coherent, picless. ----OEJ 22:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Lasagne's a person?? --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- D-lete Though I might use the first quote to my advantage elsewhere. --THINKER 06:50, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 08:53, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Doesn't do that good of a job blurring the food with the James Bond villian so delete. --Dexter111344 21:16, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:53, 15 July 2007
- Delete Frankie! 23:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Weak Keep doesn't offend me... is a pretty decent delivery, but obviously needs more. --THINKER 06:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Lowgrade jewbaiting. As usual with these articles, this one is short, listy, and witless. ----OEJ 22:11, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Blah. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:09, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:36, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dumb. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 10:59, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Dexter111344 20:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I say "joo" all the time but not in that way! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 08:52, 15 July 2007
- Delete Frankie! 23:14, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Weak Keep pending cleanup. I don't really follow the logic of typical Uncyc deletionism (can I please see a delete vote with an explanation?), and the only major problem I see right now is some dumb images. Pee Review maybe? Pentium5dot1 17:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Ditto I did like the typical song in tab form bit. I tried to play it, until my fingers started to bleed. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:23, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Rewrite Their songs actually do set people on fire though. This could be very funny without total overhaul or deletion. Oh, and my picture of the dragon jedi is genius. --THINKER 22:02, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - meh, I don't mind stuff like this. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:37, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I love it, it just needs a bit of a fixup here and there. --Theotherwhitemeat 15:31, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It's horrendous, but their loyal fan-writers have earned them a keep vote. At least some people like it. Sir Roger 06:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- In re Pentium5dot1's query: being born in a special act of creation by God is cliché. Chuck Norris is a worn-out meme. "Various unrelated things" is generally termed randumb and it's neither interesting nor funny. The lead paragraph is nonsense: it says the group is a research team but the rest of the article is about a band. The guitar tab bit is crappily formatted. And the article is filled with fancruft claiming that the band's songs are so powerful they set people on fire, kill grues, cause power failures, etc. OK, golly, we get it -- two or three fanboys think the band rocks. But in the end, who cares? ----OEJ 01:29, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- I have placed a rewrite tag on the article so that people not monitoring VFD will be more aware of the need for a rewrite. Pentium5dot1 22:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
|