From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion.
|
Keep |
- Keep It's about booze, so it can't be all bad (and yes, I am still sulking). -- di Mario 13:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. A 10-minute scribble. To author: Put some bloody effort in, laddie. To everyone else: Merry Christmas, or Happy Druid Days, and thank God the days are getting longer if you're not in Oz or Ned Zed.----OEJ 16:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- It'll be a merry Christmas when this crap doesn't exist anymore. --UNKNOWNFILE 16:13, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- LOL! - Delete. --—Braydie 16:20, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Off with his head. Looks like someone was ON Sobe when they wrote this. --Andorin Kato 02:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Kill mercilessly. I flagged this with a re-write template some while back, and it never got better. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow that one sucks. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:51, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Ok, what is this about? --—Braydie 00:55, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - A barrel of pure aids has spilt all over this article. please delete. -Tt22 01:07, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This is kind of real bad. ----OEJ 16:31, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff --GAMESPOT=666 19:21, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Slay.--Andorin Kato 02:53, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Murder --General Insineratehymn 07:04, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- kidnap, rape, murder, rape, decapatate - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:50, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Bundy was a friend of mine. He deserves better. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, and his brother Al had his own TV sitcom, with a rather yummy looking blond who was always finding interesting ways in which to ... nevermind (still sulking) -- di Mario 13:17, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Randumb, never got NRVed. --General Insineratehymn 17:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 17:27, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Gah.--UNKNOWNFILE 22:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing much.----OEJ 16:12, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Aunt Sophie SMASH!!!--Andorin Kato 02:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete (Look, okay, this sulk isn't going away anywhere in the near future, so there) -- di Mario 13:20, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- killkillkill - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep the article currently isn't so good, but give it an expansion sticker and see what happens it does seem to have potential.Nullius in Verba 05:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- I found this somewhat funny, but it really should be re-written in parts. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep and expand --Alksub 23:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Needs a facelift though.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 02:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -- di Mario 13:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC) (still sulking)
- There's a concept developing here. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:29, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Absolute crap. --General Insineratehymn 17:12, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 17:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff The article's ugliness was never improved, and is thus a prime candidate for deletion. --General Insineratehymn 17:09, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 17:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Decompile. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:17, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not very good at anything but name-dropping, is it.----OEJ 16:19, 25 December
- Delete. Some people just don't care... --Andorin Kato 02:47, 26 December 2006 (UTC)2006 (UTC)
- shitty - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:47, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Abstain! Being a virgin myself, or was it Pisces ? March 30, 1960..Year of the Dragon. Figures. Anyroads, there's a companion article Virgin Mobile that is a lot more funny. -- di Mario 13:52, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- PS : I am still sulking.
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff How was this never QVFDed!? --General Insineratehymn 17:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - People slacking. --—Braydie 17:08, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Unexist. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. 'Nuff said.----OEJ 16:16, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Another senseless victim in the war on death. And yes, indeed, how nice of you to ask, I'm still sulking. -- di Mario 13:59, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Only one fucking contribution since its creation. --General Insineratehymn 16:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Fuck. --—Braydie 16:54, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, restore then delete again. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff this fluff --Alksub 23:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - A great example of how to be stupid and not funny.-Tt22 01:11, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:43, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Rip heart out of chest and throw it on the floor and stomp on it till it dies. What a senseless waste of time... --Andorin Kato 23:48, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Abstain Being très cool myself, I cannot vote against my own. Sulk, sulk, sulk. -- di Mario 14:03, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- I dunno, it's not THAT bad. I like the pic and caption, at least. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 07:06, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- The topic deserves to be here... Give it a template for help. --fish 06:19, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- unhuff but ask author for expansion. <!-- and yes I am still sulking --> -- di Mario 14:13, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- retain - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff Consists of a line of text and a list. --General Insineratehymn 16:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 16:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- The title of this article tells me exactly what this article is, and the content of the article confirms it. Maul. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Trash it. -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 17:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff Very short, never got NRVed. --General Insineratehymn 16:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 16:33, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- The fuck? --UNKNOWNFILE 22:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing to see here.----OEJ 16:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete the divining Rod probably already divined this... -- di Mario 14:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- No hope. -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 17:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep and rewrite. This deserves a chance. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:30, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff Too old for an NRV. --General Insineratehymn 16:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Waste of my life. --—Braydie 16:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:36, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I would like to vote "Keep" because the idea is worthy, but as I am unable to do the required heavy lifting to rewrite and expand the piece I must abstain. An ab stain is when you spill red wine on your stomach, incidentally, and are too drunk to wipe it off before it dries.----OEJ 16:21, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- The idea is good, the execution leeves somewhat to be desired. And A.B. Steen appears to be a rich Philapensylvaniadelphian: http://www.philadelphiabuildings.org/pab/app/pj_display.cfm/170273. And I am still sulking. -- di Mario 14:23, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff Somehow escaped NRV. --General Insineratehymn 16:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Christ. --—Braydie 16:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Perform surgery on it, then intentionally make a critical mistake while doing so. --UNKNOWNFILE 22:31, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. ----OEJ 16:23, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, though I somehow had the sligtest idea that it was recoverable. Someone slap me. Hard.
-- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:59, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Never will be erased, huh? --Andorin Kato 02:49, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- This was funny the first 11 mozillion times. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 12:22, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Mostly plagiarized. See here for instance.----OEJ 15:43, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 16:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- If most of it is plagiarized then delete. --General Insineratehymn 16:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as copyvio. --Alksub 23:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- norton disk wipe I allmost voted keep (yes I am still sulking) but then I saw at the end he defiles the name of Alan Turing (the Sophia of computer nerds) and that made me very sad...-- di Mario 14:30, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Evidently a copypaste of Grue. -- Mitch 07:11, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Evidently a copypaste of Grue. --L 06:34, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 16:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 16:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Fire in the hole! --Andorin Kato 02:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
I am still sulking -- di Mario 14:32, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete--O bless St. Nick, this is all in Finnish and is short and despite a small history of edits has somehow escaped the coal scuttle.----OEJ 03:37, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Finnish is the language of the devil. Poistaa--Prolix 03:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 04:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 16:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 16:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- With editing dseserves a chance at life. I like quotes.--Absurdism 02:49, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Try to improve it... as it is, not very good, but could be improved. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 08:21, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Give Absurdism a fair chance of polishing it up. As as for the critizism that we already have God v Nietsche, maybe we could start a whole series of mock debates in their own category. "Irresistable Force" versus "Unmovable Object" springs to mind, or Kramer vs Kramer... -- di Mario 14:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- keep. I reformated it, much less ugly and much easier to read now - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- I DISApprove This Message Nothing but quotes. Not even remotely funny. 00:10, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 00:40, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ugly beyond belief... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 00:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff --General Insineratehymn 16:17, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- No, no, no, no, no. -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 14:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment ~_~, God V. Nietzsche was an old joke. That's like when people try to mimic AAAAAAAAA! with other gobshite. Try writing an UnBook. 20:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- i made some edits, it's still short on content but it's less bad - jack mort | cunt | talk - 19:58, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 22:33, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Kill. But we should have an article on the subject. -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 22:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Stab. - Lemon. 23:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- IMPORTANT NOTE TO ADMINS: the votes above refers to another version, not the one reverted on dec 25 by Kokot.kokotisko. -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 23:10, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- I hate to say it, but this is actually the genesis of an idea. The question is, how could you do an article on Onomatopoeia that doesn't look like this article? - Lemon. 23:28, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- I was coming up with a new version, but then I accidentaly clicked the "previous page" button. AWWWWWRRRRGH!!!! -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 23:34, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Well done, Brain. - Lemon. 01:33, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- This is really great. On December 8, somebody rewrites the article into babble, and on December 22 it is posted for deletion without anybody noticing the original version. Good job. --Kokot.kokotisko 21:53, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sincerely, I've noticed your previous version. Noticed. Hell, I've really noticed it. This is a wiki, y'know? You better watch your dear hatchlings more carefully. By the way, I'm not starting an edit war, so I will copy my version to my userpage an see what happens. As it concerns to me, your version is still VFDed, but I will not cast the first vote. -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 22:13, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff. I know that namespace needs more articles and everything, but it's just a load of quotes. -- 21:53, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Death. Hate for quotes!!! - Lemon. 22:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- ...Because this article sucks.--Prolix 22:37, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Trash it. 12-yearer material. -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 22:40, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Even though it does need more articles.. It's just.. well shit. --—Braydie 00:09, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:07, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Um, yeh. I'd wondered where all the fake quotes were going. Here, apparently.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff. -- 21:18, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete--Prolix 21:27, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete--—Braydie 00:15, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:04, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow. Really bad.----OEJ 03:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep--Prolix 21:26, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge lead and picture into Spork. --Alksub 22:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keephg--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:04, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Do we cut off our history like a foreskin? Nay! RIP IRC MTV Marcos Malo.----OEJ 03:50, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
- keep. needs biggening but isn't too objectionable as it is - jack mort | cunt | talk - 16:51, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff. -- 21:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff. Maketh no sensey. -- 21:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Prolix 21:29, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Where's the structure?! --—Braydie 00:10, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:02, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Ow. Hurty brain.----OEJ 03:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- I didn't know - --Kenvalyi 16:12, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Rename to "Famous Underestimators of Russian Winters" - Lemon. 01:36, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- KeepMost categories are inherently pointless, thats why you hardly see them around, except in most of my articles, since I love the little buggers.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- I guess this list is made for military leaders who got caught by the Russian winter. Did you miss this History class? -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 01:22, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't understand deleting it, since it's a catergory and not a real page. Prolix 01:30, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- Most acategories are inherently pointless, thats why you hardly see them around, except in most of my articles, since I love the little buggers (yes, its a copypaste).--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:07, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Prolix 06:00, 22 December 2006 (UTC)-- There aren't actually any jokes in this. It's crazy. eteleD
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Something about a revolving door, then a princess? --—Braydie 14:55, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff. -- 20:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Odd, normally I really like pages about Swedish bands that do stuff.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:20, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
- I like Therion but the band deserves a better article than this. --General Insineratehymn 16:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Fu-uuuck. All that needs to be said about this one, really. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:14, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete--Prolix 03:31, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 04:41, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Per ENeGMA --—Braydie 14:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Too random to be funny. -- Hindleyite Converse 15:08, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff. Er, what? -- 20:58, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Murder. - Lemon. 22:21, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep It's awesomely hilarious in its crappiness... ness. --Prolix 23:04, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Efking Keep Prolix has a point--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 23:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep --Alksub 23:19, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep There's no 'humor' here or 'satire or 'parody', but it is a well-regarded fact that random CAPITALIZAITON IS FUCKING FUNNY LOL! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:09, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's a good parody, I think. -- Hindleyite Converse 15:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Not Sold Out for Seven Nights at MSG funny, but more like opening act at the Macomb County Fair and Tractor Pull funny. - --Kenvalyi 16:17, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Well, I laughed. After my eyes stopped bleeding. -- 20:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
- keep --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:15, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Was NRV'd, but more of this nonsense was added and the tag was removed. Now it must pay. --Sir Zombiebaron 08:52, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. That's a no-brainer. -- Rei 16:35, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Eh? --—Braydie 16:39, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It would be a shame to delete this. It's a parody of people who write in all caps. Maybe I'm just the only one who thinks it's funny, I don't know. Prolix 23:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Kept; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)06:29, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Okay, so call me nit-picky, but why is there a redicting userpage, of a user who does not yet exist but may someday, that links to first the userpage and now the talk page of a user with a simialrly spelt and pronounced name, but yet has no links to it? I am aware that the User namespace is typically left alone, but if a User:Mowglee signs up for Uncyclopedia, he/she shouldn't have to be given a userpage which already links to Mowgli's. --Sir Zombiebaron 08:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:00, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hmm - I agree , unless there is a good reason for it.. which I fail to see one...--—Braydie 16:42, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete This is a double redirect, correct? Isn't that huff on site? --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:06, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Pointless. --Prolix 03:29, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Decruft --AAA! (AAAA) 11:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:01, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 13:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete 100% of your FDA-recommended value of Pointless Nonsense. -- Rei 17:59, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff --UNKNOWNFILE 03:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Alksub 07:57, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:07, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete--Prolix 01:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Dare you to huff it. - Lemon. 20:57, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete--—Braydie 13:33, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Stagnant. -- Mitch 03:15, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Alksub 07:59, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Neutral -- Not particularly funny, but I've seen worse. -- Rei 21:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- This is well below the level of acceptable humor. Anything even remotely as bad as this should be deleted without mercy. Just because you've seen worse doesn't mean this isn't delete-worthy shit: it is. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. -- Rei 23:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete-- Prolix 00:58, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 01:11, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 13:32, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Too many memes. --Alksub 08:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
- Brack! Breaking the "Delete" monotony. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:02, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- There's nothing close to funny on this article, and it has nothing to do with Donnie Darko (the movie or the character). -- Rei 23:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. I agree with everyone, simply not funny. Ehsanul 03:46, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This doesn't look like satire to me. It looks like racism. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 12:22, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Same. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 12:42, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.----OEJ 15:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - I mean, come on, this stuff shouldn't even be allowed on this site at all. --El Destructeso 22:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Ick.. - Lemon. 23:39, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete... NOW --AAA! (AAAA) 04:20, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Interesting. One of the first Google hits on A. Wyatt Mann, the cartoonist whose work is featured at the bottom of MLK, is quite the cesspool of anti-Semitism, holocaust denial, and paranoid conspiracy theories involving communism. The article being voted on appears to be a soapbox for this viewpoint.----OEJ 15:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC) Oops, here's a linky. ----OEJ 15:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's a "clever" (by racist standards at least) play on words: A Wyatt Man" = "A White Man". Ooh, satire. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 16:03, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Oooh, that is clever! I'm curious about the user of the pseudonym, though. There's an A. Wyatt Mann cartoon of the day page here, he's mentioned on the lovably cute-n-cuddly jew-hater Vangard News Netword forum, and an anti-hate page quotes a "poem" by him that begins "KIKE, KIKE, Weasel-like, / scheming since a hook-nosed tyke..." So I suspect there is a real
rodent human behind the pseudo. An interesting thing to track down. Any leads appreciated...an article is now officially gestating.----OEJ 17:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's odd that A. Wyatt Mann chooses to rip off R. Crumb for this anti-semetic piece. Not sure if that qualifies as irony or not? - Lemon. 21:13, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep. Wasn't this up for VFH before? And didn't I vote for it? goshzillacorrespondence 09:34, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - So what if it's an AAAAAAAAA! clone? There's tons of them here. (Nobody touch Beaker!) --AAA! (AAAA) 09:47, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Right, I am a bit of a deletionist when it comes to clones, but this is one instance I will allow myself to accept. Just about. Have you never seen The Shining?-- Hindleyite Converse 15:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- No tv and no beer makes Homer go crazy? Damn Shinning.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 16:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Hell, maybe if this author's lucky, this will become another Uncyclopedia "in-joke." --El Destructeso 22:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -- I'll be very sad if this goes away. If we hadn't already featured Aaaaaaaaaa!, I would nominate this for featured article. -- Rei 00:00, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -- Lots of spaghetti westerns are bad, lots of B-Movies are bad, most AAAAAAA! clones are bad, there are exceptions to near everything, and this, is an exception. Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
- I keep I want to.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 00:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep --Alksub 08:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- AAAAAAAAA! clone. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 05:21, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:19, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
Even I have my limits. For example, I can't drive fifty-five, but seventy is way too much for me.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:01, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff. Too many of them already, and it's not that great. -- 10:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. AAAAAAAAA! is funny the first time, after that it's a bore. A clone is not funny at all. And this one is just stupid -- to be logical it would be all WorkWorkWork. Which would still be stupid. ----OEJ 15:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- OEJ seems unfamiliar with the Shining and the countless cultural references to it. -- Rei 07:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep - Haven't you ever seen the Badger badger badger video clip? [1] So what if it's an AAAAAAAAA! clone? Nobody cares. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeh, damn badger video. I don't understand it myself, but it's interweb history.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- OK....its a meme....but not a bad one. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 10:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Mushroom. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep -- not all that wonderful, but it's not really an AAAAAAAAA! clone in my opinion. It has other words in it. Sort of.----OEJ 21:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- k33p - I don't understand why you guys get so bent out of shape about AAAAAAAAA! clones. It wouldn't be a good running gag if people didn't rip it off all of the time. However, I do admit that all of the AAAAAAAAA! clones are kind of getting annoying, so could you guys please stop? --El Destructeso 23:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - and please cut this out, Sikon. -- Rei 00:01, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep that video is funny, and the article ain't half bad.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 00:12, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - this should really be sorted out by the clone machine anyway. --Alksub 08:02, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete --Prolix 02:10, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nope.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff. -- 10:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- Rei 00:08, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Eh? --—Braydie 17:35, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 19:32, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't get it... so delete. Prolix 01:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Nobody cares. -- Mitch 06:46, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Your typical, worthless, nonsense article. Shouldn't there be a way to detect this algorithmically? ;) -- Rei 00:07, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - I agree with the above, it doesn't make sense. --—Braydie 17:32, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
*Huff. Vanity? Not funny, either way. -- 19:24, 17 December 2006 (UTC) - Oops, on Pee Review, didn't notice.
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Weak keep It's ugly and needs to be formatted all nice, but it made me grin. Prolix 01:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep It's not hilarious, but it's better than a lot of junk out there. -- Rei 00:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 19:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 23:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -Lacks that Va Va Voom. --—Braydie 17:30, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's fucking shit. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff. -- 19:05, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Prolix 01:57, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:51, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff -- Rei 00:06, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - "Official languages in the PDPRK are English, Korean, l33t and Ido." --—Braydie 17:28, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
- Murderate. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff. Long, but ugly and unfunny. -- 18:58, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sure is. Delete. --Prolix 01:58, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, that page is all over the place.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- D3l373 - Let's just say it could be better. A whole heluva lot better. Also, if the admins decide to keep this page, it definitely really has now to be grammer checked the page.
- Delete. And why say "Long, but..."? Long unfunny articles are the worst because people are afraid to delete an article if it's long. They just sit and fester. :P -- Rei 00:10, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Tenative keep The first line made me laugh, but after that... --Prolix 01:59, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff Randumb and not funny. --General Insineratehymn 04:12, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Alksub 06:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Zinging Corona? WTF? This must have been written by a true beer connoisseur; the kind of guy who likes the way that Schlitz leaves crud in his glass...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:49, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff. And hasn't this been here before? -- 10:26, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Some guy complained in the VD that his article, this one to be precise, was deleted. -- Hindleyite Converse 16:08, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Weak keep --Alksub 06:20, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 00:56, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- De-1337 this crap. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - There is about 3-4 sentences of crap under every one of those headings. --—Braydie 14:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Um, wow, this is crap. --General Insineratehymn 18:52, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff. Listy listlist. -- 19:11, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff. Not that funny. --goshzillacorrespondence 19:27, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Cliche Prolix 01:55, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:48, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- A list of cliches. Not even a mention of Optimus Prime can redeem it.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Die. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:43, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff. Pointless disambiguation page. -- 19:02, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Prolix 01:56, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:52, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Confucius says "Is a disambiguation page with only one possible choice really a disambiguation page?"--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:54, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
- Die. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:44, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- It's ugly and such. Been around far to long, and a simple rewrite cannot be done. It should be restarted from the ground up, in my opinion. --Sir Zombiebaron 21:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Destroy it and start anew. --General Insineratehymn 04:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeech --Alksub 06:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
Delete.----OEJ 15:35, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- No decent humour whatsoever. No-one knows what the hell Freeform radio is, and it's obviously 100% self indulgent. Please, do the honours. --MrMetalFLower 20:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff --Alksub 06:14, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:15, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.----OEJ 15:36, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Prolix 02:00, 18 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I just don't think it's very funny and/or clever at all, a self reference here is surely the way to go... Aaadddaaammm 04:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff Nuff said.--Shas'O'my'gosh 07:03, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- That's my line! (also, Delete) --AAA! (AAAA) 08:10, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - 14:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Alksub 06:17, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete If there is a drastic, immediate overhaul, I'll change my vote. --LLBean
|
Comments |
- Even though I don't think this is very good, I would feel guilty if I said to delete this. That's because I couldn't finish it 'cuz it was sp awful. But still. --El Destructeso 19:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 00:54, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Crude and randumb. -- Mitch 06:23, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Ok, well it's not written well (the content is crap anyway), if there wasn't a break after every line this wouldn't be very long at all. --—Braydie 14:19, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - This isn't funny. It really wants to be funny, but it just isn't. Also, this guy should seriously speelcheck his article. --El Destructeso 18:02, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep - I don't really think this is all that bad. While I will admit it's not the funniest article, I believe with a little bit of work it will be worth keeping. Like, maybe if the person wrote it as someone who is trying to attain world domination, and he is trying to convince the readers how great it is. --El Destructeso 00:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Randumb - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 07:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. One unfunny paragraph and a list.--Winston 11:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 14:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I hate articles with lists! --General Insineratehymn 06:40, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Decruft --AAA! (AAAA) 06:52, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - It mentions Oprah in the first sentence, then there is this big picture, then a huge list. --—Braydie 14:21, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Noticed this one baring a {{FFW}} tag, and decided that, mostly because Forest Fire Week is over, VFD would be a better fit. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.--Winston 11:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 14:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - I don't really get this. --El Destructeso 00:33, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Block of text, that's it. No structure at all. No pictures. --—Braydie 14:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Needs to be more about spoilers, I tried to help it a bit. Mr. Briggs Inc. 12:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
- Keep. Don't Delete it Yet!!! - Guys, before you delete this, reread. I rewrote everything on the page and its probably funnier now. (Note: I am not the original author. If the original author doesn't like what I did to his page, sorry.) --El Destructeso 19:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Too Stupid 04:54, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.--Winston 11:58, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - One reason "AAAAAAARRRRRRRRGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!". Nothing left to say. --—Braydie 14:24, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Please God, delete it all! Poor Bob tried, but the NRV tag proved too much for him. Shame that the article's old as it is... But please, seriously, this is about as bad at gets, just fucking delete it. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:09, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Even our NRV tag proved futile against this tyrannical article. Delete it before it kills more! --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 01:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete 04:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Too terrible for words.--Winston 12:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Horrible. -- Mitch 14:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Spare us, please. There needs to be an article on ska, but this isn't it.--fish 17:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep That's good: "Don't you rush me boy, or I will turn you into a digit. Probably 9." --Alksub 06:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Sure. S'okay. Needs formatting, though. - Lemon. 21:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep This is very me.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 06:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Save, it's not bad.--Winston 12:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - Could do with some pictures though. --—Braydie 14:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
- k33p - Hell, it's funnier than anything I could come up with. --El Destructeso 19:28, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- BALEETED fuckin stupid and retarted. not funny at all--Redribbbon 03:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
I don't know about this one, so I am sending it to you folks. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 22:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- I attacked the page with some formatting, how is it now?--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 06:23, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 22:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Stomp --AAA! (AAAA) 23:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Bareet! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:42, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.--Winston 12:36, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 14:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Complete, utter crap. --General Insineratehymn 04:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment - There's a kid at my school called John Wayne. Coinidence? --AAA! (AAAA) 23:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: Probably. But just to be safe, club him with a stick. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - With pleasure. Oh Johnny! --AAA! (AAAA) 06:53, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 22:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete It's just not funny --—Braydie 23:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.--Winston 12:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. No-one will rewrite it if nobody cares. -- Mitch 14:20, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete It's so crappy that one should not give the effort to rewrite it. --General Insineratehymn 04:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Eeeh, keep it, the intro is a good start and the list is decent. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
- There's something there...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:21, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- {{expand}} --Winston 12:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- I agree. It has some potential. Or perhpaps it should be folded into the list of 100 worst sequels ? -- di Mario 14:22, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Only if we rewrite it can it be worthy of praise. --General Insineratehymn 04:48, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 22:06, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 13:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- CRUSH! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.----OEJ 00:55, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.--Winston 12:02, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 14:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Yep. Sounds like Beauty and the Beast to me. Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
|
Delete |
- I think it is vanity. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 23:54, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed It's not obvious who/what it's about. --—Braydie 00:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete But keep the line 35463 women and 2 men lost their virginity. --General Insineratehymn 22:29, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Fucking Unfunny. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:37, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Kill it 04:59, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.--Winston 12:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment - As far as I can tell, this is not vanity. Gaston is a character from Beauty and the Beast, that movie. If there's anything I missed, then carry on. --Alksub 00:03, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, but is anything in the article even remotely related to that character?---Rev. Isra (talk) 01:12, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- He is indeed a character from that movie, so this is not vanity. That said, it's a tiresome article. Deletable? Too close to call. --User:The Bard/sig 00:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff ---Rev. Isra (talk) 22:39, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Begone! Fun to read, if you're into superfluity. fish 02:21, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Foul Knave! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.--Winston 12:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 14:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. I fixed it up a bit; used a semicolon; insane in a good way. --goshzillacorrespondence 22:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 21:58, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Snort. Probably not a good idea to write an article while on Special K. Lemon. 20:55, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Only funny if you're high on Ketamine. Or PCP.--Winston 12:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Dilate and I am high on fermented honion juice. -- di Mario 14:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 14:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Even with the addtion of a semi-colon, it's still bad. Amazing, because usually adding semi-colons to things help. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 23:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 21:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Kill it --AAA! (AAAA) 23:40, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- What? No, seriously. What?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Baleet per Modusoperandi.--Shas'O'my'gosh 03:45, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.--Winston 12:42, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- I like them, they're fun. I like the little series they make. I'm also a fan of recursion. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 10:03, 15 Dec 2006
- Keep. Gave me a headache. --goshzillacorrespondence 22:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. I liked the self-refferential. We should start a whole horde of such articles. -- di Mario 14:01, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 21:26, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- So, where's the duck, exactly?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff it and, while we're at it, also huff Duck (wikipedia article) (uncyclopedia article). - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 09:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- You took the words right out of my mouth. Anyway, I declare duck season: Open! --AAA! (AAAA) 09:41, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.--Winston 12:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. Aside from shortness, I don't see what's wrong. Mr. Briggs Inc. 21:35, 13 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
- Keep. There's potential here.--Winston 13:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. indeed. -- di Mario 13:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 22:34, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete The main part of it is the discography, no laughs --—Braydie 23:56, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
- Trash it -- herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 20:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Murder. Ha ha? - Lemon. 21:01, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- No Quality. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:39, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 20:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Duh. Also, "capacitator" is spelled thusly. - Lemon. 21:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- I believe the correct term is "WTF". Perhaps with a question mark at the end.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:25, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete And furthermore, it's spelled "capacitor", depending if you traveled through time to the modern era. --General Insineratehymn 22:27, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's getting too few giga-watts. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:33, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Wait a minute. I think this is genuine vanity, but read it. This is great. We (Jews) are the definition of greedy (it's an inside joke not meant to offend anyone).-edit- We can however be quite compasionate. And we are romantic as hell, especially French Jews c'mon - that's a VFH line right there. - Lemon. 21:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Man, there's a lot of Goyim at this Jewish high school - Lemon. 21:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - Vanity (I think). --AAA! (AAAA) 06:20, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- I don't think I'd call it vanity - ASU's rather infamous for it's beer-fueled illiterate student body. On the other hand... eh, I dunno - Lemon.
21:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Looks like something an illiterate jock would write. --General Insineratehymn 22:19, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Not really vanity, it just sucks. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:35, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Probably Myspace slandanity on user WiCkY wIcKy WaX. Probaby also QVFD but put it here instead 'cos of length and existence of several revisions. ----OEJ 01:23, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep I like it, despite its shortness. --Alksub 04:38, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- My god! And its old too... --Sir Zombiebaron 19:31, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Egads. Awful. ----OEJ 19:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Kick it out of here. --General Insineratehymn 21:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- G'bye. Shouldn't this go in VFQD? Lemon. 21:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- No. It was created on "20 August 2005" and is to old for QVFD. Sadly. --Sir Zombiebaron 21:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Redirected to Phase Two, vote no longer valid - VFD that one if needed. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 06:59, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- The Horror! The Horror! -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 09:30, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- oh, my eyes, they bleed. --no, yuo chat 13:39, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like maybe gamer slandanity.----OEJ 15:59, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete but we should tottally save those pictures for VFP or....NOT!!!! --Sir Zombiebaron 18:54, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete both the articles and the pictures present there. --General Insineratehymn 21:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Killy kill. Vanity, personal attacks against someone we don't know, nonsense, unfunny, outright mean. I don't know who Militia Girl is, but whoever made this is a fucking jerk. (enjoy the talk page as well.) Lemon. 21:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Executed; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)21:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- actually needs some work, but there are a lot worse out there. And the incoherency is, at least, consistent.no, yuo chat 13:45, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. This is a substantial, well-formatted article containing actual jokes and pics. It could use revision (the last bit about "Kelly" should be deleted). But it is not VFD material in my iggnerant opinion.----OEJ 16:04, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Complete Rewrite. There's no way we can do without a Vietnam War article, but this is just dumb. LLBean--Actually, I take it back. It gets better if you wade through the nonsensical opening. --LLBean
- Rewrite. But this is better than a blank page. Lemon. 21:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Looks like a lot of work went into here or not. About as funny as what an 8 year old kid could write. Nothing even makes sense. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lamrock (talk • contribs)
|
Comments |
- I removed the "Kelly" section, whatever that was. Lemon. 21:46, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Improve Feels incomplete, but vaguely wobbling towards the right direction. LLBean
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. Needs work on consistency and flow, and some original-type pics. Flawed but still better than many articles -- stuff like Fran Drescher and Namine. I think it is above the VFD bar at this time.----OEJ 16:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Attack with Lawnmower but Keep There might be decent jokes in there, but the density is simply ridiculous. --LLBean
|
Delete |
- Delete. Just attempt to read the whole thing. It's terrible. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:40, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Freeze. Everyone knows Global Warming doesn't exist. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 07:19, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- meh Killy, although I did like this one line: Journal of Applied Lobotomy Candidate Studies and Nonstandard Floor Buffer Applications , so keep thaqt one line. no, yuo chat 13:37, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. While Googling, I did find this one bit that the article was missing - [the point] - place it where you will. Lemon. 21:42, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- weak keep, mildly useful --Redribbbon 01:07, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Delete Its boring and I never use it.--Shas'O'my'gosh 02:17, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff, utter rubbish. It's like a random list of links to the worst Uncyc articles ever. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 07:10, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Sikon. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
DENIED. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)02:20, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
Let me reiterate. VOTING IS OVER. This constitutes an abuse of VFD; and Shas'O'my'gosh has been blocked by Famine for 3 days for this. I'm tempted to follow suit with everyone who voted here after I posted the "denied" remark. Guys, I'm certain this was done before. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)03:47, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
Weak keep - Easy to expand as self-reference. --Alksub 21:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Merge into Insanity and redirect --Alksub 21:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- the wikipedia entry of this name doesn't evenly remotely correspond to any of the text, so it's suspect vanity. plus, it isn't funny. no, yuo chat 15:23, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Gosh, saying random stuff sure is sophisticated humor. Irreplacable! LLBean 18:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as a production of Racter --Alksub 22:04, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- This is not funny. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:29, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Partial merge into Golf (specifically the last 2 sections) --Alksub 22:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff - Just huff it. Now. --AAA! (AAAA) 08:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Blurg no, yuo chat 15:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Make it die --Alksub 22:16, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.----OEJ 23:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Begone, spawn of darkness --User:LLBean/sig
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete Complete and utter nonsense, but for some reason has managed to stick around.--Imp88 08:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Forget wikilove. Wikidelete. --Alksub 22:18, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete -- randumb, unsensical.----OEJ 23:54, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Stab! Stab! Stab! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Completely agree with that One-eyed fella over there. --—Braydie 00:00, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
- There's good nonsense and there's bad nonsense. This is the latter.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:30, 14 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Really Weak Keep A few things worth saving, but mostly nonsense. I don't really care if it gets deleted.--Imp88 08:34, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff Vanity, not funny in any way whatsoever. --General Insineratehymn 00:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Just delete it already.--Shas'O'my'gosh 01:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Yes indeed. If it exists, it should be about the site. This is all about the forums. Lemon. 17:33, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- It just keeps going, and going, until it gets Deleted --Alksub 22:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Possibly a definitive test of any "no web-forum vanity pages allowed" policy? The thing goes back to March 2005, with probably 400+ edits. I watch its fate, the response to it, with detached interest.----OEJ 00:02, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Rewrite Only then can it join the A-Team. --General Insineratehymn 00:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
Merge with 6 (number); tagging accordingly. Pentium5dot1 04:51, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Weak keep Isn't hugely funny, but it isn't vanity (It is based on colin mochrie) and we need the entry (he's quite famous)--Shas'O'my'gosh 23:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep... in modified form. Seriously modified form. It's an entry worth having, but not so poorly written. fish 15:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete - Suspected vanity. Correct me if I'm wrong. --AAA! (AAAA) 22:40, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- If you've ever watched "Who's Line is it Anyway," Colin's the bald guy. Just so you know. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 03:36, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - This is exactly what this site is not for. You're not just supposed to make stupid mentions of Gary Coleman and God and Vin Deasel and expect it to be funny. It's just random and annoying. --El Destructeso 01:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, that page is all over the place. Focus, people!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:41, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Possible Delete - It is totally random and stupid. This crap isn't diserving of Colin. It is important to have an article on him. Maybe a rewrite? 06:03, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. This would have better chance getting rewritten as a red link Lemon. 17:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Needs a rewrite, from scratch. --Alksub 22:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Baleet! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:25, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'm making that orange box into a template though. --Alksub 22:29, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Baleet I just don't get it.--Shas'O'my'gosh 22:33, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
The International School of Port of Spain in Trinidad-and-Tobago is "an accredited, private, independent school" which "provides an excellent education for students from the Caribbean and around the world" and has "a dedicated, experienced, multinational faculty that promotes and delivers an education of the highest calibre." The Uncyc article appears to be a standard-issue parody-by-a-student. Whether the article escapes school-vanity class is arguable. ----OEJ 01:49, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep I don't see what the problem is.Prolix 19:29, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed. I blame the nom on redshirts...--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep - I honestly don't see what the problem with this article is. I think it was quite funny. I especially liked the quote "It's one of the mysteries of the force...or some crap like that." I think this person did a good job on following Uncyclopedia's rules for being funny: he kept it consistent, he blended fact and fiction, and he added an Oscar Wilde quote. I definitely believe this article is worth keeping. --El Destructeso 17:38, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep --Alksub 22:51, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Not hilarious, but it obviously contains jokes. I'm sure someone gets it. --LLBean
- Keep Indeed. Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:22, 14 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
|
Delete |
- I can't watch its eternal agony anymore. Just get rid of it. User:Guest/sig 13:51, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Please put it out of its misery. --General Insineratehymn 19:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Rewrite The entry would be quite usefull.--Shas'O'my'gosh 22:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Uncertain Delete There might be some hidden joke here, like it's a parody of a band I've never heard of, but as far as I can tell there is no band called BEE so I might aswell vote it out.--Shas'O'my'gosh 09:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Looks like vanity (I think). --AAA! (AAAA) 09:53, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - If this were a cartoon, I would have lots of lovely little question marks floating above my head. --User:LLBean/sig
- Delete Even <insert name here> could produce an article better than this. --General Insineratehymn 19:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment - Thank you. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Baleet! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:22, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- See the entry for W.A.S.P. on the satirical fount of unknowledge, Wikipedia. ----OEJ 01:37, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I read the wikipedia entry, and found the uncyclopedia one was a bunch of lame puns. I don't change my vote.--Shas'O'my'gosh 09:01, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Decruft - Self explanatory. --AAA! (AAAA) 10:22, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff - Just huff it already! --Shas'O'my'gosh 12:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Insignificant. herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 23:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. ----OEJ 01:39, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - I will admit, this has the potential to be a lot funnier. Maybe if it talked more about corn dogs being a "delicacy," but not about the Civil Rights Movement or any of that other stuff. It's just not funny. --El Destructeso 01:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
BURNINATE! WHAT THE HELL IS THIS?!?!?!.--Shas'O'my'gosh 01:32, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Okay, I don't know anything about the subject (or Sonic for that matter), but it smells like stupid, pointless, stereotypical furry bashing. Are we ED? Also, it was NRV'd by Hinoa on November 26. - User:Guest/sig 08:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- I hate this article. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- 7 "gay"s. --—Braydie 12:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- This article has sex with animals Prolix 13:30, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Burn it and let us watch. --General Insineratehymn 16:50, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Please, for the love of God, delete this!! - This article isn't funny. It's just stupid. To be honest, I could not even get through the entire page without stopping. Uncyclopedia is not about acting retarded and gay-bashing. It's about acting mildly- retarded and gay-bashing. --El Destructeso 17:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- SMITE!!! Stereotypical making fun of homosexuals. not funny.--Shas'O'my'gosh 01:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Deleted, thank god. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)02:30, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Every single forum post/talk page edit since the arrival of User:Drama
Keep |
- Keep - I'm thinking of making an UnNews article about this "drama". --AAA! (AAAA) 01:14, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's a part of our collective history, warts and all.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:40, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Please, no more - Nonymous 00:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete Vanity.--Shas'O'my'gosh 22:20, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete Not funny.--Shas'O'my'gosh 22:14, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete It's just not funny.--Shas'O'my'gosh 09:10, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Comment. Friggin hell that was quick. I should of put it on QVFD.--Shas'O'my'gosh 09:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Rewrite Some parts were pretty funny Prolix 21:42, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Really bad considering that it could be much better, and that it sucks. --
Sir Zombiebaron 02:34, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Rewrite It's crap, but we need the entry.--Shas'O'my'gosh 09:08, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I don't think it's bad enough to delete, but I also don't think it's good enough the way it is to keep. This article has potential, but if it's not changed soon, I'm going to change my vote to "delete." --El Destructeso 01:55, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- delete just delete it please.--Shas'O'my'gosh 12:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Dilate from A to Horsium edit history shows the article has been developed throughout the last year, but lately only by an IP. And we all know what that means! Oh, and I added the dreaded template-- di Mario 22:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Smells like teen vanity, too.----OEJ 02:24, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I smell the vanity, and it smells real bad. --General Insineratehymn 19:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. that hurt my glasseyes. --User:Joakimlinde/sig 19:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Oops that was the wrong link. I'll Change it.--Shas'O'my'gosh 21:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- User:Guest/sig 07:27, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Prolix 08:44, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Stupid and not funny -- di Mario 22:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. ----OEJ 02:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Do I really have to explain this one? --Shas'O'my'gosh 09:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Kill it, please. --General Insineratehymn 19:24, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Comment
|
Keep |
- Keep and open it as a Community Renovation Project. Someone added the blues names Mute Tomato Reagan and OCD Prune Coolidge, and the sample blues lyrics about the iPod and Enron. So we can make it better! All we have to do is change all the plagiarized jokes to original ones. We can do it. We are that smart!----OEJ 02:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC) --eh, comment, I have revised a little bit and put unrevised, plagiarized material in blue font. ----OEJ 03:11, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep OEJ's determination to fix it has inspired me. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Me too.--Shas'O'my'gosh 02:45, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep --AAA! (AAAA) 02:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Has enough work to keep it original, even though the basis isn't Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Eh?
|
Delete |
Delete it almost kills me to do this, because it's so funny, but the whole thing is copied from a different website. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Deleteiate. plagarism. Lemon. 20:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Agree and huff It is funny, but someone else thought of it first. Uncyc should respect other peoples copyrights, I believe it is in the magna charta somewhere. Nice work though...-- di Mario 21:38, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
BURNINATE! Extremely funny, though 100 percent plagarized.--Shas'O'my'gosh 21:52, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Wow, a community rewrite. How inspiring. Lemon. 17:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
*Weak keep Needs to be lengthened, but I thought it was funny Prolix 08:45, 8 December 2006 (changed my vote)
|
Delete |
- Strong Delete. Just an ancient stub. Useless and not funny. Also slightly ripped off Euroipods. Shas'O'my'gosh 05:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Comment Maybe it should just be put in undictionary.--Shas'O'my'gosh 12:04, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Or moved to Element. Prolix 19:49, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Old cruft. ----OEJ 03:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- BALEEEET! Terrible. --Shas'O'my'gosh 05:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- dai lite It is old, and it's skin is cold. -- di Mario 20:59, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:19, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete It is short and has no jokes. --Alksub 01:15, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. --Shas'O'my'gosh 05:13, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I looked at the edit history and it has exactly three edits, starting december 2005. Apparently, the author(s) didn't care very much about this one... -- di Mario 20:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- meh --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 13:18, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete.----OEJ 01:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This article is in kind of a predicament. It could be funnier, but I have no idea how. The list wasn't very funny, but the basic idea of the article was. Although I'm kind of leaning towards deletion, I think you should give this article a chance. It is a stub, though... --El Destructeso 02:02, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- keep we had a similiar thing on the uncyc #chan and it was actually QDB'd [[2]], so people do find this sort of thing funny. I do. -- di Mario 21:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- What the fox? - User:Guest/sig 19:18, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- What he said.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:37, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Why has this happened? Lemon. 21:25, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff Quick! Call the Thought Police!--Shas'O'my'gosh 05:16, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- It's not needed. --—Braydie 20:01, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Just another version of the Snakes on a Plane sequels, without the funny. --Imp88 10:21, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - I will admit that some of the movies, like Beavis and Borat do America or Kill Borat are kind of funny, but overall it's repetitive and annoying. --El Destructeso 02:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- My hidden shame is I can't vote to kill pages that mention "furiously masturbating". I guess it's not all that hidden anymore. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:36, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Let it be. Needs work, but has potential. Lemon. 21:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- week keap. It has been there since june 2005, why huff it now ? -- di Mario 21:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- k33p - You have to cut this guy some slack. He's doing the best he can. Also, I like the Great Fire of London part. That was funny. --El Destructeso 02:19, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Add a picture or something. The text is fine. Prolix 21:33, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Incoherent and unfunny. --Jesusforaday 15:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Delete. Suppose it has got a bit of potential, just not a lot.--Shas'O'my'gosh 05:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Hold on: I've expanded the article a bit. If you've already made up your mind, please reread the article before voting. --Alksub 20:39, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Unfunny, maybe vanity. --Jesusforaday 15:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- A random paragraph and two lists. Why bother? --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:32, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Nonsense that doesn't even attempt to be funny. --Imp88 10:29, 9 December 2006
- Really bad, and we don't need the entry. Delete--Shas'O'my'gosh 12:09, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
- Huff I don't even know what this article is about.. not written well at all, and as Modus said, it's just a paragraph and some lists. --—Braydie 20:25, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- meh Whatever. -- di Mario 21:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff -- 12:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Too listy and unfunny. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 14:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- retch --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:30, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete It's just a list. --—Braydie 12:24, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Response to di Mario The difference between this and Ice_Cream_Flavors_Not_in_the_Top_100 is that stankee candles does not give any form of description to their different candles, while Ice Cream Flavors does.
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete This article makes no sense. Please huff. 06:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --—Braydie 20:22, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Irredeemable crap. --General Insineratehymn 23:14, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Despite the unfortunal gaffe of talking about things that haven't happened yet, this is an oddity that I don't mind.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:28, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Weak keep The premisse is rather original (I am a sucker for time travel stories). Maybe the execution will improve as time goes by...You must remember this, a kiss is still a kiss, a sigh is but a sigh, the ordinary things apply, as time...goes...by! Of all of the gin joints and she had to walk into mine. Hit it Stevie (Sorry, Carli Simon on the stereo over here) -- di Mario 20:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
*Delete Not funny at all Prolix 08:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Lacks sense. ----OEJ 13:15, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- BURNINATOR What the hell is this? Vanity? Personal? I would've baleeted it but I'm not an admin..."--Railcgun 23:00, 6 December 2006 (UTC)"
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff No actual content, just a bunch of templates. It is so ugly that it made my eyes bleed. --General Insineratehymn 21:43, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Burn. I think the point was to make it look like the site, but to what end? Lemon. 22:44, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Nobody cares. -- Mitch 02:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Make content not meh.----OEJ 13:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- Cold.ee You all have so true. I added the Dreaded Template to it. --di Mario 19:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Restored previous redirect, talked to user who spammed the templates in its place. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 12/8 00:37
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Make this die. Whatever this is. Lemon. 07:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! No. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 14:30, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Hufff and Pough It rambles way too many and looks like a certain Dutchman making his way home after the pub closed... -- di Mario 19:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Classic randumb.----OEJ 13:20, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Strong Keep - Not VFH worthy, but it isn't VFD worthy, either. (This, however, is another matter...) --AAA! (AAAA) 07:56, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep you friggin' moron whoever added this to VFD! This is lnked over 6000 articles! It is teh classics! --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN
- Comment - And an In-joke! --AAA! (AAAA) 08:02, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- I can't believe the lemon is trying to delete your mom. Keep.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 08:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep but it needs saving. Save it! --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 14:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Extremely strong KEEP It is entirely true what Smartiblartfast writes: this is a classic and there are at least 500 articles linking to it. You would have to be Bat Fuck Insane to put this on VFD. Oh wait, it was Lemon. Huh? Gronk? She's not Bat Fuck Insane! WTF ?! -- di Mario 19:07, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Not only is this shit, but I'd hazard to guess that over half of it is stolen shit. Lemon. 07:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- KILL It's piss poor and not funny. At the very least, it needs the steady hand of an editor who is NOT a chronic masturbator. --DarthFredd 06:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
- Murder. - User:Guest/sig 07:28, 8 December 2006 (UTC)`
|
Comments |
- Jesus, didn't realize this was such a fan favorite. Sorry. Lemon. 22:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- You know when a friend tells a joke, then you don't laugh, and he says, "You had to be there."? This is one of those.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
- I hate to present this in so crude a manner, but your mom actually was fabulous. And before you start to snigger, your mom was fabulous too. Man the way she reacted to those handcuffs...grade A material. And I have it all on tape... -- di Mario 22:29, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Terrible Prolix 04:10, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Crap, shit, wtf. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 14:31, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete It's not funny and it's not satire, it's just a meagre idea executed poorly. --
di Mario 18:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Old cruft. ----OEJ 01:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:40, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- meh, too random. Not unrandom enough.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- 'uff. It does not add to my hexperience of this marvelous h'place. -- di Mario 18:53, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- There are people who know what this page says. I am not one of those people. So I'll have to render my vote based on the fact that it's formatted real purdy-like. Maybe a pic would help teach me what an Alien Swarm is.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Keep A lot of work has gone into this page, and it is not that bad. -- di Mario 18:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete It's like an unholy orgy of shitty, one line sections. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I agree.----OEJ 01:57, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- An unholy orgy of shitty, one line sections is actually more fun than this. This sucks. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:42, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Prolix 08:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Flag for rewrite. Not that I enjoy it, but I think the entry is needed. Although... Christ, this does suck. Lemon. 07:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Was ICU-tagged about a month ago; the anonymous author removed the tag a few days later without otherwise changing it. --The Divine Fluffalizer - [t m] 20:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
- Take a look at these hands! Delete it. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Dispell. Stubby. herr doktor needsAcell [scream!] 01:12, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Egads -- teh bad. ----OEJ 01:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- <non sequitur>Oh...my...god. Siouxsie Sioux is almost fifty!</non sequitur> --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- di Lite This article is full of deliberate untruths! It will look bad for our reputation if this one ever gets out. -- di Mario 18:19, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|