From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (1) |
- I see no difference between this and the crap I nommed on VFD all that time ago. Can it stay dead this time? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:46, April 13, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
That's just like David Cameroon's policy of fighting to steal, as used in Libya with the oil reserves. Gabriel Turner (talk) 13:11, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Disambiguation page with only one functioning link, it should redirect to Conan O'Brien I guess. Mattsnow 09:48, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
- It's more or less pointless. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:55, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
- QVFD redundant. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:46, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
- Change to redirect, but would suggest that it would be more appropriate as a disambig page if we had Conan the barbarian. • Puppy's talk page • 11:58 09 Apr
|
Comments |
- Seriously, why delete it? Wouldn't it be better to just redirect it instead? Gabriel Turner (talk) 11:28, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
- To remove the content of a page and change to a redirect is the same as a deletion, and needs a VFD vote to do. The "delete" votes here are asking to do exactly that. • Puppy's talk page • 11:54 09 Apr
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (2) |
- I assume this listing is a response to last night's vandalism by Anon, which I have reverted. Like all pages on NBA players, especially uniquely talent-challenged ones, the page attracts fancruft and deserves autoconfirmed protection. Spıke Ѧ 10:47 7-Apr-12
- Actually, that brought it to my attention. I looked through the history and found nothing really redeemable. Autoconfirmed will stop it being vandalised, but as it is it's still sub-par. • Puppy's talk page • 11:24 07 Apr
- I can live with either result of the vote. However, if deleted, I think it will come back, and it will not be better. Spıke Ѧ 23:20 7-Apr-12
- Bizzeebeever seems to have taken custody of it. Spıke Ѧ 22:06 8-Apr-12
- Fixed! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:49, April 9, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (0) |
I have no idea who, and nothing in this makes me laugh or want to find out. Unless the fan jokes are pants-pissingly funny, nothing worth keeping. • Puppy's talk page • 07:12 07 Apr
Eh, it's lame. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:02, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (5) |
- Actually, as an in-the-style-of, it makes sense to anyone who knows the series. • Puppy's talk page • 11:26 07 Apr
- Pikachu pikachu pika-pika-pikachu! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:02, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
- I love that image with the kids screwing around in Pikachu's vagina. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:18, 7 April 2012
- This is for Qzekrom! |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Kemador CUN|IC Kill | 06:52, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
- Nonsense at is best.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 06:59, April 8, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- this dumb ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:48, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete Garfield would not approve. MrN Fork you! 00:35, Apr 6
- I thought it was spelt with an e on the end EpicAwesomeness (talk) 13:45, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Wow! WTF is this? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:52, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Well, the Mayans were well known for having repeated group intercourse with Italian cuisine. • Puppy's talk page • 07:04 07 Apr
- TDFFVDFDGSVSF?????FFGFFRVDGDFDFDGDGTF!!!MAYANS HAD SEX WITH LAGSANA!!!!1111--fcukman
LOOS3R! 09:19, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
- ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:46, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete As a rule it's sometime possible to add {{fix|list}} to this kinda article, but I'm not sure it's possible to score with this one. MrN Fork you! 19:03, Apr 5
- Totally unfunny list. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:30, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- 0.1 Yugoslavia jokes, 0.2 football (go fuck yourselves) jokes, 0.5 random humour, the rest is a void of boredom and pointlessness. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 13:33, April 6, 2012 (UTC)
- Possibly fixable, but not worth the effort for a below D-grade topic requiring > 90% rewrite. • Puppy's talk page • 06:59 07 Apr
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (3) |
- Strangely interesting (i.e. ï FǿCKïN HäTë BRÒCÒLLï). Not a bad page, at all, at all. Aleister 2:00 4-4-'12
- Surprisingly entertaining. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:21, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Startlingly enthralling. Ugliness alone should never cause an article to be deleted (except maybe in extreme cases). —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:36, 4 April 2012
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete Not sure what this is, but... MrN Fork you! 00:53, Apr 4
- whatever --Roman Dog Bird (talk) 01:11, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
- Nôt tërrīblė, büt ñõt pręttŷ. Thë çòńčêpt mėåñš įt ćæńt bē dœñė āńÿ õthêr ŵäŷ thøügh. • Puppy's talk page • 01:18 04 Apr
- Delete. Errrr the accents make it ugly and its not funny? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:22, April 7, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN Fork you! 23:26, Apr 7
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Maybe vanity. Definitely ugly. Absolutely poorly written. Distinct lack of images. NRV. • Puppy's talk page • 01:33 04 Apr
- ShitFcuk.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 03:09, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
- SOOOOO BAD!!!! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:21, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
- googilygoogily Aleister 11:00 5-4-'12
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (1) |
- That's quite ovbious.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 02:53, April 4, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete current version and return to March 29 revision. • Puppy's talk page • 09:51 03 Apr
- I just brought this up on Mr-ex777's talk page. I tried to be nice, but it's pretty awful. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:55, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Isn't this some video game thing from the 1990's? mAttlobster. (hello) 10:39, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- It needs an editor badly, there's far too much rubbish in this one that distracts from what the article is supposed to be. I'd agree with POTR's suggestion. --ChiefjusticeWii 14:05, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete the whole article then. The rendundant one is not really funny.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 14:06, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. I think what Mr-ex is trying to do has some potential, but he has to change his approach completely. A much better approach, in my opinion, would be to write the article from the point of view of the kind of weird, crazy Pokémon fan he's mocking in the current article. I think we did something similar for Michael Jackson. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:24, 3 April 2012
- Why does this deserved to be huffed? at least it's better than the original one.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 10:43, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- I sort of think that the original one might have been better. It had an entertaining concept even if it wasn't executed perfectly. This, on the other hand, just sounds like a rant. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:02, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- The first block of text is just bad. The japanese thing stands for "Penis' hole". Ain't that funny? and rants are funnier than rendundancy. Also, the original version has been VFD' once.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 13:05, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Look, I'm not saying that the original version is perfect, but pokemon is redundant, so being redundant is appropriate in this instance. That version was clever. Saying things like "TEH POKEMANS IS GHEY,GHEY,GHEY!!!111!1111!!!" isn't original and isn't funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:15, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- That was purposed to give sacrasm against those crazy fantards, in fact, they are really like that.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 13:40, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- I know, which is why it isn't funny. If lots of people say something, writing down the same thing to mock them doesn't work. Had an IP or a red link user/N00b done this, it would have been assumed to be vandalism and would be reverted immediately. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:50, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
- I forgot this is the fifth gen. there is more than platinum.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 13:56, April 5, 2012 (UTC)
Reverted and Sysop Protected. This is not really what VFD is for, rant, random comments about procedure, etc, don't do it again (unless you do) MrN Fork you! 19:43, Apr 5
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Damn ye MrN, I vote save which means I have to work on it, although later, later. There's lots of good jokes here (and by here I mean on this VFD entry), and maybe Puppy can join in this save (actually, it shouldn't be too hard). Pics should be findable if the dumpster's not locked. MrN! Aleister 13:21 3-4-'12
- Keep Aleister is doing this maliciously you understand. MrN Fork you! 18:17, Apr 3
|
Delete (1) |
Delete Towncruft. MrN Fork you! 11:31, Apr 3 MrN Fork you! 18:17, Apr 3
- Delete. Per this guy. --Scofield & Friends 12:56, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I dunno. For a town cruft it's not as badly written as some others. I'd give it a {{Fix}} and see if it gets any takers in the next 30 days. And then kill it if unimproved. If I'm outvoted though - which isn't wholly unlikely - then stick in it my space, as I may be able to use bits of it for a later project. • Puppy's talk page • 01:10 03 Apr
- I thought about fixing it myself, but figured there was not enough there for it to be worth it. MrN Fork you! 15:49, Apr 3
Aleistered MrN Fork you! 13:42, Apr 4
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- To get the VFD que rolling again, here's an abysmal article found by mashing the random page button, a task easier said than done with the old skin. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:17, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
- that • Puppy's talk page • 08:17 03 Apr
- Pretty horrific article. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 11:08, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Lame. --Scofield & Friends 12:58, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Dubya tee eff. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:28, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- No original material. Fairly dull. • Puppy's talk page • 01:26 01 Apr
- Quotecide. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:41, April 2, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:43, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Nice one Max, but I don't think this one stands on it's own, and we have the main article, but I can't see any of those quotes being good in that article. :) MrN Fork you! 02:56, Apr 3
|
Comments |
- Comment. I created this page when I cleaned up the main Borat Sagdiyev article. All I did was move the overly long quotes section to the Unquotable namespace. I can delete it if it's that bad. MadMax (talk) 18:22, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
- It's just that as far as I know all of these are from the movie. Given how people love to quote this movie it makes them stale jokes, and unoriginal. Somebody may decide this is funny, or worth saving, but I'm not a fan of articles that are based upon existing comedies with no new material. • Puppy's talk page • 12:50 02 Apr
- That's fine. I'm not contesting the nomination. I only meant you could have put it on QVFD or used {{fix}} (if someone were interested in rewriting it). MadMax (talk) 01:36, April 3, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (4) |
- Hell no! Probably one of the most vital of vital vitals (even if Wikipedia haven't got it in the top 100). It has suffered a lot of article rot over time, but even just going back half a dozen edits it's much better. And being a vital it didn't show at UN:FIX. But this sucker still needs fixing, but definitely not deletion. • Puppy's talk page • 07:59 01 Apr
- Keep. Major topic. The fix tag has been altered which is giving rise to these nominations (I.E. They should be nominated for VFD as opposed to cleanup or re-write).--Sycamore (Talk) 10:17, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Vital. The base of many articles.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 11:14, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Vital and responsible for many deaths. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:30, 2 April 2012
|
Delete (2) |
- There's been a {{fix}} at the top of this for a good month now, and little has been done to improve it, so I guess it's fair game. ~jcm 20:18, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Yikes! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:54, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN Fork you! 00:48, Apr 3
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (4) |
- Nope.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 00:39, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Featured article. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:53, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
- That too. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:54, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Vital. Feature. • Puppy's talk page • 08:20 01 Apr
- Keep. Amusing in parts, major topic, feature etc etc....--Sycamore (Talk) 10:14, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Same as below ~jcm 20:23, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Fuck all you guys. It's shit. Shitty-shit-shit. Shit-faced shit. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:43, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
- This is truly terrible, and is vastly different from the seven-year-old featured version, which in itself is crap. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Apr 1 '12 8:01 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Articles with vital or feature status don't show on UN:FIX. But they do need to be fixed, so the tag is added. • Puppy's talk page • 08:20 01 Apr
- Smiths comment - The poopsmith lounge was made to discuss this kind of nomination - which is considerably more sensible than nominations that will be archived (like this one) by default. Perhaps in future discussions either at the lounge or on my talk page could resolve such confusions on VFD and prevent time wasted on such nominations.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:14, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Smith's lounge has been archived due to extensive disuse. • Puppy's talk page • 11:49 01 Apr
- Perhaps re-opening it would be an idea.--Sycamore (Talk) 11:58, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
- I'm not sure. ZB would be the person to talk to on that score, but I seem to recall that it was opened primarily due to VFD having excessive entries. Not really the case now. • Puppy's talk page • 12:10 01 Apr
Kept MrN Fork you! 22:50, Apr 1
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- It can't be fixed, but I'm at least putting on a spare tire. Will come back for more, Goddess help me. Aleister 18:20 28-3-2005
- Yeah, it's fixed up. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:51, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Going through our NFL articles I don't think this one can be fixed. MrN Fork you! 13:42, Mar 28
Will change my vote if Aleister fixes it up. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:52, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Hey, it was fixed up. I'm losing what little talent I had, losing it man!!! Al 19:21 28-3
- Sorry, I just don't understand what the joke is here. I think it could use a little more work, but it's definitely better than the way it was before. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:02, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
- I don't understand the joke either! But he's Brian Urlacher, so he won't go down without a fight. Ok, I'll add some more, I'll just go crazy and add crazy stuff! hehehehehehehe here I come, get out of my way, I'm going to spread the crazy on the page like peanut on butter!!! Aleister 21:17 28-3-'12
|
Comments |
Kept/rewritten MrN Fork you! 13:23, Apr 1
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (5) |
- This was at one time a disambiguation page. It is again. Please remove cyberbullying when you find it. Recommend protection level auto confirmed to reduce article rot. • Puppy's talk page • 10:59 28 Mar
- Per pup.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 12:59, March 29, 2012 (UTC)
- Cyberbullying is currently gone, it is now a disambiguation page. Per Puppy, protect and keep the article. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 07:28, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Per above.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:18, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Per everyone Aleister April Foolishness Day
|
Delete (4) |
- If we cut the cyber-bullying there's like nothing left. Mattsnow 19:56, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Vanity. I'd personally say that this qualifies for QVFD. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:30, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Abuse and useless list. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:41, March 27, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. Per Romartus. I would rather have a red link encouraging a new article. That's a pants pointless not that funny list. It's not a useful disambiguation page IMO. MrN Fork you! 01:56, Apr 1
|
Comments |
- with a lot of work, this article could work... but for the most part of it, it seems like short lines that should be a trivia part of the article rather then a whole article. Delete it tho if it doesn't get ALOT added to it.---Maniac1075Complain Here 12:52, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
Use the {{VFD}} template, people. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Mar 30 '12 19:22 (UTC)
- Er, when an IP removes the VFD template, make sure to REVERT, people. As you were. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Mar 30 '12 19:24 (UTC)
Kept MrN Fork you! 22:46, Apr 1
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Also, nobody used the proper {{VFD}} template. Next time, USE THE {{VFD}} TEMPLATE, jackasses. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Mar 30 '12 19:20 (UTC)
- Keep. Not really that bad.--Sycamore (Talk) 10:19, April 1, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. MrN Fork you! 22:44, Apr 1
|
Delete (3) |
- Obliterate. Jesus. This is bad. This is very, very bad. - ENTER CITADEL T)alk C)untributions B)an 15:49, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Oh boy. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:23, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:29, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Actually, I thought it was fairly good irony. Needs {{AAP}} on it though. • Puppy's talk page • 10:49 28 Mar
- it's not that bad, but far from funny at the same time. If it took the piss out of something in a funny way, then ok, but it seems too much like a pissed off member flaming the place.. potential for a decent re-write, but i'm fucked if I'm doing it! ---Maniac1075Complain Here 13:07, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
- If kept, this article is likely to eventually die anyway from a fix tag. Too many redlinks, and poor formatting. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 07:34, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
Kept MrN Fork you! 22:44, Apr 1
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Going through our NFL articles I don't think this one can be fixed. MrN Fork you! 13:42, Mar 28
- Awful. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:53, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
- delete Mattsnow 20:12, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:04, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete Roozie (talk) 20:00, March 31, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
not the worst thing I have read, and could do with some inspirational story about Hollywood making a movie out of him for his bravery... but I can't be bothered writing it, and you can't be bothered writing, no one can be bothered writing it, so delete it.---Maniac1075Complain Here 12:56, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Going through our NFL articles I don't think this one can be fixed. MrN Fork you! 13:42, Mar 28
- Very, very, very, very, [insert infinite number of verys here] bad. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:54, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 28 '12 19:12 (UTC)
- Delete. Mattsnow 20:13, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
- Lol what the hell nfl even is lol i think its some made up thing omg nfl does not even exist and so should not this article OMG!!! It`s Cat the Colourful, Jesus Christ!!! 19:20 31 March 2012
|
Comments |
- Ok, the attempt at humor here...is playing "opposites." Ryan Leaf was a superlatively over-hyped American college football quarterback who went to the NFL...and bombed spectacularly, horrifically, in a manner that was laugh-out-loud hilarious to anyone but fans of the team that drafted him. True things that the article makes no attempt to exploit: Leaf was a type-A douchebag who tended to blame his teammates for his poor performances (wikipedia); got into physical altercations with reporters, fans, and his own teammates; and years after leaving the NFL, was arrested for committing a burglary involving controlled substances -- arrested by U.S. customs agents, while re-entering the U.S. after leaving a Vancouver drug rehab program. And then there's the brain tumor. I ask you: how could someone fail so miserably at parodying this? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 28 '12 19:12 (UTC)
- Response It is kinda hard to make jokes about cancer tastefully. But having said that, what would it take for you to bulldoze and rebuild, given your knowledge of topic? • Puppy's talk page • 09:44 29 Mar
- Oh, no, it wasn't cancer. Benign tumor. As for bulldozing it and rebuilding the article...I've tried that with a couple of articles on VFD recently (Fighter aircraft for one) and my sense of "funny" just isn't working right now. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Thu, Mar 29 '12 21:47 (UTC)
- They're on VFD already, so nothing to lose, and best thing to do when hitting that block is keep going. I actually was at one of those blocks with HowTo:Be Happy (hence it's so much darker than most of my stuff) but polish and feedback helped me get it over the line. (I realised later that I'd recycled a few old jokes as well, but it worked as part of the new.) The alternative is to let the block beat you, which is a bad idea. • Puppy's talk page • 11:02 29 Mar
- It's been going on for about four months, here. I think it's already won. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Mar 30 '12 19:28 (UTC)
- Tish and Pshaw. • Puppy's talk page • 07:42 31 Mar
- They literally just busted Ryan Leaf again. No joke. For drug possession and burglary. AGAIN. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Mar 31 '12 8:11 (UTC)
- Rewrite it! • Puppy's talk page • 09:45 31 Mar
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Just needs a couple more weirder and more apocalyptic endings. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:42, 25 March 2012
- This is classic. A perfect parody of Sim City. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:07, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Dis shit be funny -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:28, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Why is this still here? How is it funny? • Puppy's talk page • 11:29 24 Mar
There's no funny. :(
- Sign your disapproval next time -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:28, March 28, 2012 (UTC)
- Another no matter how, you die game.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 06:05, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
- Hard reboot. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Mar 25 '12 6:15 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept MrN Fork you! 09:30, Mar 28
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (1) |
- Basically, this is a list which takes some meme or celebrity and then says that they should be arrested for some reason that either makes no sense or is a joke that's been used about 500 million times. Either way, it's not funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:33, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This might be a better version. MadMax (talk) 18:47, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
- At least Chuck norris and oscar wilde aren't here.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 11:12, March 26, 2012 (UTC)
Kept Apparently UN:N, also RV back to version recommended by Max. If you still hate this maybe try nominating again sometime later. MrN Fork you! 16:01, Mar 26
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (2) |
- Seems OK at first glance. Redirect to "Cocaine". Then redirect "Coke" to "Coca-Cola. That should do it. I'll go over "Cocaine" and snort some life into it. Aleister 20:51 21-3-'12
- Keep This should not really be here... it is a {{Merge}} job - after which it should either be a redirect to coca-cola or vice versa.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:36, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Seems ok. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:01, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Crap. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:20, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Redirect to Coca-Cola, now that it has come back to life, or convert to a disambig page with coca-cola, cocaine and frog semen. Amazingly the fact the the wikipediapar on Frog Semen goes to Wikipedia:Coca-Cola is one of the things on that article that I saw praised over at WP. (Which is why I did that. Apparently I suffer from premature redirection.) • Puppy's talk page • 09:15 21 Mar
- Either disambig or Frog Semen seems fine to me. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 21:33 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Pup turned this article into a redirect to Frog Semen, but I'm told that's not proper, so I figured "let's have a vote!" Crummy article is crummy
, but I'm abstaining for the moment. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 18:08 (UTC)
- Merge or disperse the keepable content to the relevant article(s) and change this into a disambiguation page to whatever coke-related articles we have around here. Wasn't sure where to put this 'vote'. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:27, 23 March 2012
Merged or Something MrN Fork you! 15:55, Mar 26
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (4) |
- Not bad and well illustrated. I like anything that tells the Larry Sanger story. This could be improved, with maybe more cowbell, and I'll put in a few dozen months on it. Aleister 9:47 21-3-'12
- I like it.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 10:25, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Keep. Maybe you could help this new contributer with their first article - as opposed to nominating their first efforts on VFD. I hope this nomination is well remembered when anyone in the delete camp here brings or contributes to forums on user retention or site activity.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:34, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
- The author of this will not come back as he was banned for stirring up a shit storm. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:45, March 23, 2012 (UTC)
- Some potential I feel, not so keen to chuck it out. Needs a fix tag/userspacing though. --ChiefjusticeWii 22:22, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- Unfunny nonsense. We have enough Wikipedia is evil and fake Intelligence agency garbage, and that is the whole concept. Stale humour. • Puppy's talk page • 09:34 21 Mar
- Strong delete ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 09:37, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
Not funny. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 10:23 (UTC)
- Per Pup. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:24, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete plz -- UserTalkContributions 18:57, March 24, 2012 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see the funny. MrN Fork you! 02:05, Mar 25
|
Comments |
- Invalid nomination. This article is only 3 days old, or some such? Should be on ICU, and deleted at the discretion of an admin. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 10:37 (UTC)
- Invalid!! No validity!! What would be the reason for an ICU? Aleister 10:42 (ICU)
- It's lame, and lacks Funny. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 10:51 (UTC)
- It's a llama and Funnybony isn't working on it? Possibly true, but life isn't all llamas you know. Aleister 10:53 21-3-'12
- The fat man walks alone at midnight. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 10:55 (UTC)
- I this had gone on to ICU, then it would (99% chance) have gone through to an admin without change, as the original author is banned. Then it would have likely been deleted. Then the original author would never have come back - etc. Here is an opportunity to salvage the article (which I see little salvageable about it myself) rather than this vanishing before you have had a chance to read it. Putting this here means that the community has had the chance to decide it's fate. In short, it's a hell of a lot nicer for a n00b to have this happen then the alternative. While you are being critical of this having a chance to be saved via VFD, have a quick look at Uncyclopedia:Articles to fix, which seems to still be being ignored, or Category:ICU for the 500+ articles that are currently slated for demise. • Puppy's talk page • 10:03 25 Mar
- Kept --ChiefjusticeWii 22:22, March 25, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- I didn't find anything here amusing at all. It seems to be a load of dribble and hard attempts at humor that do not work. It surprises me it has not been VFD since its original incarnation in 2005.---Maniac1075Complain Here 10:54, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, quite terrible. However, I bet a Street Fighter fan votes "keep". ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Mar 21 '12 11:03 (UTC)
- Maniac is, among other things, our wrestling expert around here. I don't know who Zanfief is. Aleister 11:08 21-3-'12
- I put the fix tag on it. Now that I think about it, I should have VFD'd it on the spot. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:21, March 21, 2012 (UTC)
- This makes 5. Moving to my userspace. • Puppy's talk page • 07:56 23 Mar
|
Comments |
- Per BB I want to vote for it as a keep, but also he's right. I might have another look at it though and see if clean-up is possible. So if it's deleted could a copy be added to my userspace? • Puppy's talk page • 12:02 21 Mar
- @
Aleister Analstar; Zangief is a character from the video game Street Fighter II, and the bazillion sequels that followed. About the only thing that was almost funny was the part about the Japanese (creators) making his moves so hard to do as a result of the cold war with Russia. Zangief is a Russian wrestler, who bares scars all over his body, because his back-story is he supposedly wrestled bears. To execute one of his moves, called the spinning pile-driver, where Zangief grabs an opponent in a pile driver, then spins 360/720/8whatever through the air, then drops them on their head. To do that move, you had to rotate the joystick/control pad directions in a 360 spin from left to left, or right to right, then hit a punch button. It was considered to be the hardest move to pull off in Street Fighter II. Therefor, Zangief was not a popular player to play as. Plus, he was pretty slow, and his chest hair reminded me of your moms bum that hasn't been shaved in years, so it's understandable his character probably should have had a leather cop suit on to let people know his character was pretty gay and you shouldn't bother to use him. So if someone is going to attempt to re-write it, that part is about the moves being so hard to do is about the only thing from the article that could remain and improved on... alot....a hell of a lot. It isn't funny the way it is, but someone could re-write it funnier I think.---Maniac1075Complain Here 04:40, March 22, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- What is this? -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:28, March 19, 2012 (UTC)
- A vague resemblance to Yes Minister, but very poorly done parody. Clunky concept leads to clunkier execution. • Puppy's talk page • 08:39 19 Mar
- What The Fuckingham Palace? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Mar 19 '12 11:02 (UTC)
- Whuh? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:15, March 19, 2012 (UTC)
- The name is a weapon of some sort, I'm sure. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:40, March 20, 2012 (UTC)
- You may fire when ready... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 16:50 March 20, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. It's supposed to have list, plus it's super duper great and funny. -- UserTalkContributions 16:30, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I went at random and smiled several times. Looks like what it's about. Not a bad page, just listy, but hey, annoying. Aleister 16:32 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not a very stellar page, but if you deleted 90% of the lists, the rest of it would still be an acceptable enough article in my not-so-honest opinion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:39, 17 March 2012
- God--fcukman
LOOS3R! 10:08, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
- Listy... but funny. I even laughed. Isn't that what counts? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 15:43 March 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- The issues are
- It's a list
- It's very listy
- There are a number of lists
- There are list like elements
- List cruft
- • Puppy's talk page • 04:24 17 Mar
|
Comments |
Full-size for full-effect. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 15:43 March 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (7) |
- Deleting the lead picture of a VFH candidate seems extremely weird to me. It seems like this would be better handled with a suggestion to the author to replace that picture, possibly by suggesting a suitable alternative. pillow talk 20:56, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
- He wouldn't replace the original (same base image, but with just veins and some cum drawn on) when I suggested that. I'd find it to link it, but I'm at work.
1234 ~ 21:51, 16 March 2012
- Wait, sorry; I mixed that up. Although I'm pretty sure someone already did on the nompage anyway, but I'll mention it again, I guess.
1234 ~ 22:25, 16 March 2012
- I don't... really... understand what you're saying. pillow talk 23:33, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Or that he put at least another pic on the page, a less penisy one, which can be used on the main page if it's featured. But it's perfect for the article itself. I can never play Playstation 3 again. Aleister 21:05 Ides of March Boxing Day '12
- Hahahahaha -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:13, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
- Cool delete reasons bro. This isn't porn, nor is it not funny. Bringing this to VFD is political and a waste of time. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:55, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
- Nom to VFP--fcukman
LOOS3R! 05:21, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
- 8===================D--- lol • Puppy's talk page • 05:25 17 Mar
- If it was an actual photo of a penis, I might reconsider, but it's just a crude drawing, and obviously nothing sexual. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:41, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- Just too much, and isn't doing the article any favours either since with it the entire joke is very obviously out there even before one reads the thing. Also not a good lead image in general.
1234 ~ 19:46, 16 March 2012
- Just too much. MrN Fork you! 21:30, Mar 16
- If it were more like a penis, or less like a penis, I would say it stays. But somehow you've managed to hit the Uncanny Valley of dicks. I thought I could go my entire life without typing that sentence, but apparently not. Seriously, Reefer Desk this thing. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 21:53 Mar 16, 2012
- Would the Uncanny Valley of Dicks look like what I think it looks like? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Mar 17 '12 12:49 (UTC)
- Penis. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:59, March 16, 2012 (UTC)
- What thems guys said. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 16:01 March 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. I'm extremely biased against images with anything even resembling a penis in them. But if TKF and others consider it a vital part of the article, I guess I'll live. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:57, 16 March 2012
- Hahahaha! Two admins enter, only one leaves! I'm-a sit back over here in the corner and not vote, and when a victor emerges with their opponent's severed head, I'm-a prostrate myself before them and vow undying fealty. See? Lookit me, Mr. I'm-So-Cool-and-Uninvolved-in-the-Current-Drama. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Mar 17 '12 12:48 (UTC)
- On a related note, should we delete File:Glowydildo.jpg? Because that's an actual clay mold of EugeneK's dick. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:04, 17 March 2012
- It's not a big deal. • Puppy's talk page • 10:59 17 Mar
- That's what she said. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Mar 18 '12 16:59 (UTC)
- Keeped' -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:42, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete this is a diff to a better version and there are a few others, but... MrN Fork you! 06:36, Mar 17
- Full of pokemon jokes and chuck norris.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 06:50, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
- What Mr-ex777 said. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:47, March 17, 2012 (UTC)
- That's the better version? • Puppy's talk page • 04:54 17 Mar
- I shall summarize my vote using one word: "NO." ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Mar 18 '12 13:33 (UTC)
- Burninate! It needs to go away. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 15:47 March 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Please move it to my userspace after deleteion.--fcukman
LOOS3R! 08:21, March 18, 2012 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Nah, can't get rid of Soccer. Several people could work on this, but deleting it is counterproductive. On sort of the same topic, I looked at the Science Fiction page today and the Science Fiction template on the bottom, and they both are a sea of red links. What have we done? So let's improve Soccer instead of heading it out of the field (ay, ay, nudge nudge). Aleister 00:19 Ides of March
- I tried to fix um honest! But eye could n' stash the main sail captain. MrN Fork you! 00:25, Mar 15
- Just scanned the first third of it, and it isn't that bad. I'll put in some time, but not today, although I'm not a big fan. Point is, will someone come along and do better? Maybe it could be cut back by a third, with the rest picked at from time to time, and one of those times someone is bound to SCCCCCOOOOOOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRREEE, or not. Aleister 00:35 Ides of March
- Keep Aleister has beaten me by maliciously rewriting and editing this article. He was whistling whilst he did it. MrN Fork you! 15:04, Mar 15
- Jeez, no. Just added in some stuff, took out some. I have very little knowledge of soccer and its league structures, because it is so boring. Playing it is good exercise though, it's the watching that dulls the senses. Aleister 20:06 Ides of March
- Keep per Aleister's rewrite. Also, this is too notable a topic to just delete, as I commented below. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 23:31, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
Delete Simsilikesims has fought bravely to try to save this. It has a fix tag, and is likely to be kicked around for ages without being fixed because it's too similar to Football. Maybe redirect to that, or leave a red link to encourage something new. MrN Fork you! 23:26, Mar 13 Dammit! MrN Fork you! 15:04, Mar 15
- Redirect to Football. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:05, March 14, 2012 (UTC)
- Redirect to American Football -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 06:04, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
- In this country, we call it football. It's also a better article. May as well redirect. Sir Georgie • Harangue • Mediocracy 19:16, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- In America, what we call Football is played with one's hands (similar to rugby but with padding), and what you call Football, we call soccer. Soccer isn't really that popular in many areas of the US, except among kids. I delistified this article a little bit, but as with any popular topic, it tends to be subject to article rot. A worse article is likely to take its place, unless an effort to rewrite it is made with established writers.-- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 00:10, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
- I read somewhere recently (I think in Talk:Handegg) that football is called football not because you don't use hands but because it's played on foot instead of on horseback. So why don't they call Tennis football? Pup 12:35 15 Mar '12
- In American football, there are some situations when one does kick the ball, unlike tennis. That might have something to do with it. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:41, March 15, 2012 (UTC)
Changed loads since nomination so... Kept MrN Fork you! 10:44, Mar 16
|