Uncyclopedia:VFH/archive10
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:VFH. |
HowTo:Cook While Drunk
Featured —Braydie 00:29, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Self nom & for I think this is pretty funny, but I can't get anyone to confirm or deny this. I'll take my chances. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 08:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Conditional for Get rid of the stupid russian reversal at the start.-- 10:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Done --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 12:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support. --L 11:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Hilarious. Plus, Floyd is a cooking idol. ~ 18:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:15, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Has the author been spying on me in the kitchen? The cake is genius. Phantom Grammar 20:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. The cake bit achieved the rare feat of making me laugh while at work. Good stuff. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 22:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. It is hale and hearty. --Zarbag 22:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Faaaaaaantastic. Yugoslavian F 03:36, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For Ah yes. The things we do when we are intoxicated... --Marto 85 08:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For But move it to "HowTo: Dook While Crunk". --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 11:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For, all that's missing is a stir fry.--Nydas 20:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 00:37, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for Was going to vote against but the part about the tomato sauce as blood and omelete, omelete..., mushroom, mushroom saved it
--Uncle J 18:49, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- For. Awesome, I loved the skank part. --Iceman187
- For --GAMESPOT=666 19:42, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- For-- Meteshjj My bologna has a first name, it's O-P-R-A-H! Whoo!!! 22:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- For...for some reason I found this much more funny the second read around--Shandon 21:20, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
Moses
Featured —Braydie 00:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Self nom and For - Honorable Mention in PLS. —Braydie 19:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong for. Terrific.--Procopius 14:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Good stuff champ. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 17:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 20:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- For, although I'm still annoyed that he yelled at me after that whole Golden Calf thing. Zealous prick. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For the love of god..... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 15:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:32, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Wow, you know the site is good when a page this great only warrants an "honorable mention." User:Wehpudicabok/sig 01:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Niiiiice. --El Zoof 06:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against.InfiniteMonkey 10:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- AH! For I totally thought I had already voted. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 12:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 20:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. In your face, Gore Vidal! -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 20:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - It's gneomI 07:58, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Oh Moses, Moses, you great big adorable fool you. Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 13:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Because I contributed a nail to this house... of Moses! --AmericanBastard 05:52, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For This article parts the funny. --Kenvalyi 15:36, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
Movie Trailer Announcer Guy
Featured —Braydie 00:10, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
- Self nom and for. I put a lot of hard work into this article, to make it look like a movie trailer. I think everybody will get the jokes. PF4Eva, the King of Imagination talk Contributions 22:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. This looks a lot like Me, except it doesn't suck. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:00, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 23:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. I've been watching this one since it was started, and it's come a long way. <baritone>It will be featured.</baritone> Nice job, PF4Eva! User:Wehpudicabok/sig 07:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Perhaps a few too many quotes in the way, but other than that, quite funny. ;) -- Rei 23:13, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against. The only funny part was the Youtube vid. --So So 02:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- against - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Rated R for foR Very good. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 08:31, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For It's original, and well executed --GAMESPOT=666 01:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
For Answering all my questions
For Very well done article. Dork Lord
- For. ~ 21:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Helped out on this one Retrofuture42 13:43, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Coming soon to a front page near you. -- Hindleyite Converse 18:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for. The yellow text is VERY hard to read. Otherwise, good work.--Procopius 15:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for. Pretty good. goshzillacorrespondence 16:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)!
- For This featured article is not yet rated.--Dr. Fenwick 17:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. For obvious reasons Mr. Briggs Inc. 12:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- For Very good. -- 02:36, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- For Why the hell not? --Imaginarykid27 04:38, 3 March 2007
- Feature! -- 16:19, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
The Porchesian Holocaust
Featured —Braydie 00:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For Brilliant writing. Great Concept. Perfect Images. This page has it all. --Yoshi-TRM 00:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Nice. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. It was a sad day for Porchesia, but perhaps by remembering them they can live on.John1728 02:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- No, thanks. Internet memes, vandalism apology, not factual but a little obvious. Sorry. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 02:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. The last paragraph (not a Moridillo piece) sort of explains the joke and spoils it. Remove it and I'll vote for.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 05:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Hilarious.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 14:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For. I laughed through the entire thing. (By the way, a false article deleted by a Wikipedia admin doesn't exactly count as a meme, does it?) User:Wehpudicabok/sig 06:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. /me bows my head honoring the people of Porchesia. ~ 11:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm gonna say yes for the same reason I felt compelled to edit it. Plus, the plight of the Porchesians must be heard! -- Hindleyite Converse 14:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 17:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For, as if a billion Porchesians cried out, and fell silent.--Procopius 19:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- Featuring this article would be the greatest honor we could give the Porcheseans. --Yoshi-TRM 21:16, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I tried recreating the Porchesia article on Wikipedia, but it was deleted in 30 minutes. -- 01:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- FOR Great work of investigative journalism. ((User:Ayatollah Gurkhmeini/sig}} 17:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. I've unintentionally created a storm of confusion over the naming: First, I proposed a move to Porchesian Holocaust (where it is currently), then Flyingfeline went ahead with the move (which I didn't notice, not having updated the page in enough time), then I changed the move template to Porchesia, but this was removed by Flyingfeline out of an understandable exasperation. (I also changed my explanation for this on the talkpage, but have since moved that to Flyingfeline's talk after it got blanked (again understandably) in the middle of my editing. So... yeah. We'll all get through this, I'm sure. —Lenoxus 00:46, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- You might as well vote for the bloody thing :) ~ 12:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- I guess, but it's just that I'm, well, so anal... I mean, is this an article about the Holocaust or the country? It's brilliant either way, of course. Oh, screw it.-- Lenoxus 18:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- You might as well vote for the bloody thing :) ~ 12:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I'd better vote for it too. A shame that Porchesia became our own little Alderaan and that Danny was our Grand Moff Tarkin. Moff Danny, anyone? --チンドカ 11:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- For despite the stupid name confusions. -- Lenoxus 18:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I went there on vacation last summer. It wa*User Gamiac deleted, for reason "He never existed"*
- For Really well written. It's funny that a non-existent country could slip through Wiki's nets for so long. --Benny Goodman 22:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- For The part about no one will have dominance over another person unless asked to during a sexual act did it for me lol --Uncle J 12:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 00:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Future ☭f tomorrow, today!
Featured —rc (t) 08:46, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- Nom & For. If Modus is not earning money from his talent, he either is a copyleft taliban or is wasting time here. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 14:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Very much for. ~ 16:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- STR☭NG F☭R, 17:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Joy for all comrades! --Composure1 19:31, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:41, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Love it. -- Hindleyite Converse 21:17, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Da I am being in the mad love with article that is this one, and with pictures that are being on it. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- For In Soviet Russia, article votes for you!-- Meteshjj My bologna has a first name, it's O-P-R-A-H! Whoo!!! 00:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, Comrade. Think very carefully about whether you want to vote against this article... -- 00:57, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For - not only because I am afraid of what will happen if I vote against. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For. Sometime is fun to break inside bedroom of reality and pull tag off mattress. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:31, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For Yes, this absolute gold! --Marto 85 08:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- 4. --L 13:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For--Shandon 18:48, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Phantom Grammar 19:54, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R -- 20:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For Uncles Fyodor and Pyotr would be proud.--Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 21:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For Never tought a robot could have moustaches. That's really the world of tomorrow!--DAME :: FoxyBabe :: TALK 22:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Is comment. Moustache not just for mens of manly! Is too for robobots and far-future automobile. Also, for combotnik. Is true!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:27, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie 22:20, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R--Jsemmens 23:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Is to be being For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 00:35, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
UnBooks:Practical Lessons on Communism
Featured —rc (t) 08:13, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- N☭MINATION & F☭R, 22:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R Amazing article. In Soviet Russia, Communism learns YOU!!--Jsemmens 23:23, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R Hilari☭us! F☭r the M☭therland!!!-- 23:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. /me hides under desk while Russian Reversals fly by.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For the revolution!. I owe you a pack of M&M's, comrade Mayfair! ;) -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 9:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For This is good. —Braydie 20:05, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:15, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For if only for the cartoons --Zarbag 23:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Now, that the grammar is fixed, I think it is awesome!--Meteshjj 03:38, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Never has an Uncyclopedia article taught me so much... I must spread this new-found knowledge to Eastern Europe... And making this aticle featured will be the first step, Comrades. -- The preceding unsigned vote was added by Gazco. Diff: [1].
- For clever, funny, good pictures. A little piece of joy Phantom Grammar 22:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- For... er, F☭r. Dammit, just ☭☭☭. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- The party graciously thanks you for your contribution, comrade! - Prof. Ahh(to the)Diddums[FUCK-A-DOODLE-DOO!] 07:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - Just because I never gotten an A at my sociology tests.--DAME :: FoxyBabe :: TALK 14:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. And if anyone votes against this, they are a capitalist, freedom-loving traitor. -Gamiac 20:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - Long live the revolution --Uncle J 00:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Conditional For...as long as the author admits I'm not the model for Oliver Shandy...--Shandon 11:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- FθЯ I'd say 4/10, but we don't have grades any more like those other, capitalist classes. -- 54x F@H (XXXX!) 13:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - And I'm a super-capitalist libertarian, too! --Sir Judgement F@H UmP VFH {talk} 00:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Hear that tom? KILL HIM!!!.-- 10:57, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- /me kills Judgement 01:24, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- For featuring today.... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 18:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment How could anyone vote against this?-- 21:46, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
Education
Featured —rc (t) 07:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom My second favorite Best Rewrite PLS entry, and the overall winner. —rc (t) 07:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. I'm pretty sure I'm Zook. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:47, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - Sexual Education! --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 11:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 17:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For, and I'd like to go on a ramble about how this is the best example of rewrite I've ever seen: It is not only terrifically hilarious, but it accomplishes this while including most of the content of an article that was terrible in the process. In the future, I'm referencing this to educate others on how rewrites should be done. :)--<<>> 21:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- FOR! t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Just an excellent article. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- For, as an active fnord participant fnord in fnord public fnord school fnord, which fnord I fnord consider fnord brainwashing. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:52, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie 06:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- For--Shandon 07:10, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- 4 A great satire of a great evil. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH 17:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Kelpan 21:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- For.--Procopius 16:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Now I know not to touch blackened corpses! Uncyclopedia has changed my life. Swordmaster 22:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Loved it. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Uncle J 12:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Faster Pussycat Kill Kill 13:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Honesty
Featured —rc (t) 07:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom & For: another PLS entry; winner in the "Best Article" category. Definitely deserves to make it on the front page. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 16:37, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 19:06, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- For It's tradition! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:52, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- For, 03:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Honestly, this is good. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Rocks, and to a lesser extent, rolls. Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- For This article fixed my car. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 12:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie 15:57, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- "Against". Alright, I lied.--Procopius 15:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I'm not gonna lie, this is great stuff. --Yoshi-TRM 03:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- For--Shandon 00:00, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- ForA common lie: George washington could not tell a lie. This is a lie perpetuated bu the liar who in fact lied once to tell you that he could not lie. Weasel 3689 21:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I learned this in Preschool! :) --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 12:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Very funny. All that without Oscar, Chuck or T (not that there's anyhting wrong with them!). The habitual liar was gold! --Marto 85 07:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against Ethereal 08:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For Chester A. Arthur hilarious!--Gaberou 21:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For This Article was absolutley side slapping. The style of writing and command of the english language in this article only benefited the witty humor and clever ideas.Zim64
HowTo:Deliver a Baby, A Concise and Easy-to-follow Guide Developed, Tested, and Approved by the AMA (No, Not that AMA. The Other One) and Reprinted with the Permission of the JAMA (Also a Different One)
Featured —rc (t) 06:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and for Absolutely hilarious! --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Cap and Ben said it all. —Braydie 02:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Go for it. --Andorin Kato 05:56, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I saw Modusoperandi moving a bunch of redirects to this page around on recent changes earlier today, and talking up plenty of space whilst doing it. Also, its a funny article, with good drawings. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 06:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For more pages with octopus. Oh, and babies. Both are adorable.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Mild 4. --L 12:08, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- I try not to vote for too many HowTo articles, but this one is great. For. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:11, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Pretty damn good. Even better if I sign my vote. -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 15:27, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Long title -- did Squiggle possess MO at some point?--Procopius 16:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Bad boy Modus. I love evil stuff. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 19:22, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- FOR - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For, but I swear that I did not write the title. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For--lives up to the warning at the top--Shandon 23:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Holy crap that's hilarious! User:Wehpudicabok/sig 04:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- For and only because Modus started the whole affair. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- For heh. Phantom Grammar 22:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Protect and Survive
Featured —rc (t) 07:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For. Fundlebuggian hilarity. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 23:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For PROTECT AND SURVIVE! --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for. --L 03:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. A thoroughly informative document, which will be of as much use as any other when the bombs fall. El Zoof 04:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For a great satire on the pointlessness of nuclear war. Loved the line "We made it! Now it's just us and the cockroaches!" -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Oh freakin hell Wehpudicabok! I was gonna nom this...you know, eventually. --Anyone 14:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Nyah nyah nyah. ;) User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. ~ 16:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭r, 19:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 08:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes. --Emmzee 21:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hell yeah. REALLY FUNNY.--Xzeta 21:47, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. It reminds me of growing up in the 50's. Except I didn't grow up in the 50's. And I didn't grow up. What were we talking about?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:49, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong for. This is why HF is Writer of the Year.--Procopius 15:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I thought it was pretty funny.--Jsemmens 17:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Duck and cove --- BOOOM!!! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 21:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Now I can't wait for the warning! --Kenvalyi 14:23, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. An interesting slab of foibles. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy - (Ring for service) 06:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
UnBooks:The Adventures of Baron Ringpiece
Featured —rc (t) 07:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and Strong For Sparkling brilliance. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:15, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Penispenispenis. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 14:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- For a masterstroke of literature, en par with Milton, Swift or some other drunken author of ages past. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 15:30, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 23:45, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:48, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Anyone 14:49, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I don't get it, what's so funny? -- 23:41, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Thackeray is GOD!!! The Humbled Master 02:57, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Very good quality writing. --Composure1 05:34, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 13:27, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Noel Coward --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:15, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- for <Mhaille> <shouts and waves arms>VOTE FOR http://uncyclopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Uncyclopedia:VFH#UnBooks:The_Adventures_of_Baron_Ringpiece Sliferjam ~ This is my new signature. Cool huh? 14:04, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- PUBLISH! This is what an unbook should be. genuinely funny and expertly written - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:46, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Splendidly crafted and charmingly vulgar. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- For--Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 11:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against Certainly funny in many places, but too much (well-written) filler for the front page, in my opinion. -- Rei 23:41, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - because the Bad Book is a bad place (and the article is pimp.) --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 23:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- against -- 00:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Foursome. --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 19:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Hindleyite Converse 18:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against. I don't get it. goshzillacorrespondence 19:22, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For R 14:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For...the history log says penispenispenis isn't funny...and I agree.--Shandon 03:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 12:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- FOR Sheer and utter brilliance. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH 17:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 23:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
HowTo:Live in an RPG
Featured —rc (t) 08:42, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For I found this one especially tickled my funny bone. It has great images, lost of jokes, and a good concept. Looks good to me. --love, gustav talk at menope 21:05, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Utterly hilarious. God, I'm such a geek... -- Rei 01:04, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 01:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, Even though it didn't tell me a damn thin' 'bout livin' in an RPG. 03:28, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- FOR, I wrote it a long time ago and decided to publish here in uncyclo' just to make some people laugh a little. I wasn't expecting a nomination. Thanks Gustavo! --DAME :: FoxyBabe :: TALK 12:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:08, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Great stuff...but really nerdy! Smrt-guy 23:19, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
for 38/40 Famitsu score.19:24, 15 February 2007 (UTC)Unsigned vote. Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)- For --Kelpan 21:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- For, even though I know nothing about video games that aren't Pro Evo Soccer. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 23:33, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- For great justice! Wait, wrong genre. Um. Have I lost an eighth? --El Zoof 02:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Really good.--Lt. Wyoming 04:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. I remember when Ultima IV was cutting edge . . . sigh . . . but nice to know people still don't lock things in RPGs.--Procopius 15:33, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Dancing mushrooms are funny. --Naughty Budgie 08:49, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 04:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Damn I love HowTos! High General Grue 04:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for. Some of the writing could be cleaner, but the satire on a subject that desperately needs it is dead on. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 02:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Damn it feels good to be an adventura. --Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 16:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- For LOL, welcome in every house and free to mess with the dog, the pretty daughter, and open cabinets to take things, they don't mind lol --Uncle J 16:11, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- For A million hit points and maximum charisma! --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
UnNews:Al-Qaeda operative spills the beans
Featured —rc (t) 07:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
- N+F - a simple joke, but worked out very thoroughly and nicely - David Gerard 08:38, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Up For. (and a quarter). BerogenVFH 12:31, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Soon to be a TV movie starring Omar Sharif as Prisoner #426 and Ernest Borgnine as Dick Cheney. True story.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:30, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- For It's true! The Humbled Master 04:09, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 00:08, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For InfiniteMonkey 05:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Composure1 20:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- For-- Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Nice article. General Tso's Chicken 02:59, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 01:27, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:46, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Kazpc21 15:31, 30 January 2007
- For --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:00, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For InfiniteMonkey 18:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Uncle J 22:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Yepper.--Procopius 16:08, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. goshzillacorrespondence 19:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Jsemmens 17:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 17:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
HowTo:Stop Playing the Accordion
Featured —rc (t) 07:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Self nom & for. Well, obviously *I* think it's funny... El Zoof 00:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Foooooormp. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 00:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - I was actually coming to this page to nominate it, and just put the vfh notice on it - David Gerard 00:37, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - For God's sake! This is funny! It's gneomI 05:09, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 08:36, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Why would anyone want to stop playing the accordion? But it's a good article, because mostly it's about learning to play. Rogpyvbc 08:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC) (an accordion player)
- For - perfect piece of misdirection. I like this a lot.--Nydas 12:12, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For! - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Agree with Nydas. --Anyone 18:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Agree with Rogpyvbc. -- Hindleyite Converse 21:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Funny.--Shas 06:12, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Well done. I think we'll be seeing more good things from El Zoof in the future. -- Rei 23:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against. I like the concept, but the writing lacks focus. --So So 02:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment on So So THATS THE HOLE POINT!.--Shas 03:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Spelling
erectionCorrection- not hole, whole. Sorry.--Shas 03:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC) - For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:36, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 08:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For--Jsemmens 17:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 03:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- For FUNNY AS HELL!!! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 03:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- ForI likes it. And might as well break the three-way tie for feature tomorrow.--Yoshi-TRM 22:37, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Easy target, but funny regardless.--Procopius 16:02, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Set the damn thing on Fire!!!!! Weasel 3689 12:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Fire the damn thing on Set! --Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 16:13, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. In Soviet Russia, accordion stops playing YOU!!!! goshzillacorrespondence 16:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC)!
HowTo:Start a Religion
Featured —rc (t) 05:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and for Hah. This is seriously one of the funniest things I've EVER seen on this website. I lol'd for a good minute there. --love, gustav talk at menope 03:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. I was the primary writer of this article, so that stands to reason. User:InfiniteMonkey did a lot for this article as well. Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 03:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --~ 03:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. And aw, shucks, thanks for the complement. InfiniteMonkey 05:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Truly one of the best articles I've seen on Uncyclopedia. This definitely deserves to be featured. -- 05:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Definitely. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 06:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie 06:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Now, to whom to I send all my money? --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for. --L 09:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. This floats my boat. Phantom Grammar 10:02, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Funny doesn't have to be overly long.now go vote for Mae Zedong--Procopius 13:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Hey! I wanted to write this HoeTo! Good stuff. Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 14:35, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 17:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Brilliant!--Jsemmens 18:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Hindleyite Converse 18:58, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 20:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- FOR!! goshzillacorrespondence 21:13, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 21:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Uncle J 21:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Wow this got featured pretty quick.--Yoshi-TRM 23:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Question: Do you mean nominated? I don't see the featured bit just yet —Lenoxus 05:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- STRONG FOR restored my faith in HowTos, which had until now somewhat jumped the shark. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:39, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --GAMESPOT=666 01:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- For the new god of Wikipedia. All hail! --El Zoof 04:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Awesome. I am very tempted to follow the instructions and start my own religion now. --Composure1 04:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
- For i <3 tjhis thing, just read it and it roxorz massively. a hell of a lot better than a lot of iother articles that have been featured - nothing against them. they are all awesome, just many to a lesser extent —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.222.11.71 (talk • contribs) diff
- ForThis is awesome. It makes me hopeful that I can start my own mayo-hating religion.--Meteshjj 05:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Nuremberg Rally
Featured —rc (t) 07:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For Another PLS entry. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:57, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For, brilliantly done article, wipes the floor with articles like Nazi and Fascism.--Nydas 09:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. A pun I wish I'd thought of.--<<>> 12:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)--<<>> 12:55, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - awesome. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 16:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah...wish *I'd* thought of that pun......hang on a minute.... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 20:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- -yeah, thank you Mhaille!--Shandon 15:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ja gets a big thumbs up and a Sieg Heil. ~ 10:16, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- For...risked with a different style, glad somebody liked it--Shandon 15:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- FOR anything with Nazis or puns is generally hilarious. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH 17:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Das ist gut. Heil! Whiteside pie4eva!!! I LIKE PIE TOO! 18:59, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I voted for it in PLS, but the other judges were all, "Get out of our category!", so I was all, "Whatever!" I sure told them.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:47, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- ForFabulous idea, very well written --DAME :: FoxyBabe :: TALK 13:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- This article is coming down the home stretch, and the finish line's in sight! -- #1_ALF_FAN 14:41, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Wündebar!!!. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 14:49, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie 15:59, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Sieg HEIL!!! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 03:45, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - ”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 14:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For.--Procopius 15:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Pretty Good Schtuff. Definitley clever.--Yoshi-TRM 03:29, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Jsemmens 21:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Civil War
Featured —rc (t) 08:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For PLS entry. —rc (t) 00:39, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For What more can I say? What more can i say? What more can i do? I give this all to you. I know this much is true. My Life. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yessir -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie 03:01, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. This article got more laughs while I was reviewing than any other article.--<<>> 03:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 00:41, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. To vote otherwise would be uncivil.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:39, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. ~ 10:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - It's gneomI 21:18, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Jolly good, wot. Pleasant war we're having, eh, old chum? Swordmaster 21:43, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Bluepaladin 02:33, 13 February 2007 (UTC) This is a kickass article
- For, one of my favorite PLS entries (besides my own). --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 16:19, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 03:31, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For, this article is great --Uncle J 04:01, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Ethereal 17:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Although I hate to be a pedant (that's a lie, I can't get enough of it), the English Civil War, preceded the Act of Union by 50-odd years, so "British" is wrong. I'll correct this unfortunate error. Great article though. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 00:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Good day, sir! If may say, you look like the type of fellow who would CENSORED a guy up the CENSORED while giving the courtesy of a reach around.--Procopius 15:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For My good man, do be so civil as to -- INCOMING!!! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 21:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Wow, a good explanation for a big part of history. MoosePie 00:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
Google Middle Earth
Featured —rc (t) 08:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nomandfor -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 17:42, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak against -- Terribly sorry, but this just won't do. Not so much for the content as it is for the formatting. That can really make or break an article. Fix that, and I'll reconsider. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 18:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 19:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- yes sir, thank ya' sir. You ever drunk baileys from a shoe? - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- FOR This is very, very good, out of what could have been very clichéd. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:43, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I love it Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:29, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Didn't I vote for this before? Didn't I see that woman before? Wasn't this guy alive when I went to sleep?--Procopius 03:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:31, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- This was one of my first articles, I think from Most Wanted...so obligatory For and e|m|c, you are free to change the formatting if you like--Shandon 23:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: this was on Most Wanted? Really? User:Wehpudicabok/sig 06:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- The reason the Internet was invented. Except for porn. --Emmzee 14:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 17:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For-Retrofuture42 19:30, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak for. Wonderful idea, and brilliantly written, but I've been hesitant to vote for it because it seems like there's more you can do with the idea (the same reason I didn't nom it when it was first written). I still think that, but I also think it's great as is. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 06:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Gondor! --UtarEmpire 11:19, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Those are some top-notch funny images. -- Rei 23:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 20:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - It's gneomI 21:21, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
*For------being so silly Unsigned vote.--<<>> 12:42, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. I liked it when I first read it ages ago. -- Hindleyite Converse 18:46, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- For ...one search engine to bring them all and in the darkness BIND THEM!!! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 03:54, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Erraticus
Featured —Braydie 08:15, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom & For One of the greats. Keep it up, Procopius! The Humbled Master 22:30, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:32, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong for. A classic. I've always loved this article. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:43, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:45, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. I could've SWORN this was featured.--<<>> 01:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:48, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For And shame on you all for not featuring the first time around. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:09, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:15, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- 3. --L 06:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Why this wasn't featured first time round remains one of the greatest travesties of our time! A big, fat, hairy-arsed FOR -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 09:00, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Summum Erraticus, summa iniuria.--Procopius 12:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I can't resist voting for Procopius' work. It's almost as good as Erraticus' work. --Composure1 15:40, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- for. swear i just voted for this today, who stole my vote? YES - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:50, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For this is a great article. I don't have any idea why it was not done at the beginning. Sir Àrd-Easbaig Gearcemeanaigh Mac Ádhaimh, UmP (Talk - Articles) - KUN SEXY WH 01:53, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 11:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 04:57, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Well done. -- Rei 23:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- 03:12, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For(!); much funnier than most of the carp herein. --DW III 18:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - It's gneomI 21:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - Excellent piece of writing. Phantom Grammar 13:27, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - This has been in VFH for entirely too long. Time to feature.--Yoshi-TRM 17:26, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- 24rdth For in a row. Spot the errata. -- Hindleyite Converse 18:48, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- For It's a better article than you'll ever make. ~McDestroyertron (talk) 08:19, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
League of Nations
Featured —rc (t) 06:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Self Nom and For Rewrite of an article that was saved from NRV. Sports/competition theme. —Braydie at 18:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For that picture of Woodrow holding the trophy is amazing, eh? --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. The Hawkeye one is good too. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 19:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:08, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- for. well good - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
For Go get 'em woody!
- Unsigned vote. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:40, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- 23:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:54, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Composure1 16:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --~ 04:11, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 20:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Swordmaster 22:38, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For, but I invaded Ethiopia anyway.--Procopius 04:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:13, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against - --Uncle J 21:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - Cause I don't like five. And that joke is not funny. It's gneomI 14:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - nil. -- Hindleyite Converse 20:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - no comment required. 13:29, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch 13:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 16:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 03:33, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak For Great Idea! But could b a little bit funnier Weasel 3689 19:45 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- 23:41, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
You Are Dead, NOW WITH AUDIO!!
Featured —rc (t) 07:22, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For Hilariously absurd. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I concur. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 21:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- for. bizzare - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:11, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. I am not! *pout* --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:32, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. I am! *broad smile* --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:33, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- *** Weak For ***. --L 03:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 06:43, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Merciless for. --Emmzee 13:24, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- ForInfiniteMonkey 18:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. So So is brilliant. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 00:29, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --~ 04:12, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Atheist humor, without noodles. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 14:03, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 20:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For.--Procopius 04:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:26, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- 22:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 08:02, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --The One and Only Czar Yah 01:05, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Uncle J 00:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 20:03, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - It's gneomI 21:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
For -- ((Not a registered user))Previously Featured, silly bunny --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:25, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
Jihad My Ride
- Featured —rc (t) 06:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For - Ingenious and hilarious. User:Counciltucky at 12:40, 12 February 2007
- Nom and For - Gneomi's managed to turn it into a great article. —Braydie at 14:57, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - Yeah, Bjiatch! R 16:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Uncle J 17:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For I must congratulate Gneomi on pulling this article from the brink of being VFDed, and making it great. -- 21:41, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - Hmmm. It's gneomI 22:50, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For lol. could b fixed up a little bit but perrty funny Weasel 3689 16:15 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Great idea, well-executed. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 01:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --AAA! (AAAA) 01:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- 02:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 03:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong for, this is absolutely hilarious --GAMESPOT=666 04:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Very good, Gneomi. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:43, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch 07:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:56, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Excellent improvement. For! -- 22:40, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Now can someone lend a hand putting my car out?--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For- It's just great. There isn't much more I can say. --Captain Kickass 09:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 11:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against -- Far, far better than the version that nearly got VFDed, but didn't make me laugh. Perhaps a little smile, but not front page material. -- Rei
- For. This is one of the first articles that have actually gotten me to fall out of me seat. Hilarious...nice job. --love, gustav talk at menope 18:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 19:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 19:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For,--Scott 21:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Hil-FREAKIN'-arious! Up it goes! The Humbled Master 18:15, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For. --24.148.175.40 18:58, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
List of one letter words starting with A
Featured —rc (t) 07:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom & For. I don't even know why I'm here. No, seriously though, it is a very funny article. It's gneomI 13:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Well, I wrote it, of course I want to
pimpmake sure it's read by a wide group of extremely wise and witty people. Well, half. El Zoof 13:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC) - For Well-formatted and witty. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 16:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- I suspect the author of this article is suffering from some sort of brain damage, perhaps from being dropped on the head as an infant. Strong For.InfiniteMonkey 16:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 21:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. It's pretty funny.--Jsemmens 02:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --GAMESPOT=666 02:51, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Not what I expected, effing clodzarks.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 06:27, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - I saw it on PEE and said "VFH now plz." I did the picture - David Gerard 07:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. --So So 13:13, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Emmzee 14:26, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For! -- Hindleyite Converse 19:05, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 23:07, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Stompy 14:50, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Jsemmens 01:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 20:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Genius. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 07:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
HowTo:Make Cheesy Sci-Fi
Featured —rc (t) 07:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nomination and for.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 13:41, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For the squeeks, the beeps and the blips. ~ 17:42, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -Retrofuture42 20:57, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. superb - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:47, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 23:46, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- 0x4. --L 03:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Well, this article was written by four hands. Two of them were mine.--DAME :: FoxyBabe :: TALK 13:46, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. And the other, rougher ones, mine. Thanks Asteroid for the nomination! -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 13:48, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Conditional for. Funny treatment of a feature-worthy subject but the writing needs to be cleaned up first- lots of misspelling, poor word choice, improper grammar.InfiniteMonkey 15:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 21:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Wow, I love insulting bad movies, and this makes it a form of high art. Swordmaster 22:13, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against. It's less a satire of Sci-Fi than a compilation of ways in which films break rules of physics. I enjoyed the "Mustn't Have" section, though.--Procopius 04:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment It's interesting to note the the #1 article of 2006 on the Polish version of Uncyclopedia was this article about unrealistic things done in movies http://nonsensopedia.wikia.com/wiki/Teoria_filmowej_rzeczywisto%C5%9Bci --Composure1 05:00, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Maybe you should think twice. We talk about economy, society, biology and other stuff. Yes, it's somewhat listy, but certainly not restricted to physics. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 05:04, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For using the word cheesy in many ways. -- the preceding unsigned vote was added by 69.70.28.83 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits ); diff: [2]
- For -- My screenname alone should tell you my opinion on mixtures of science fiction and comedy. -- #1_ALF_FAN 21:45, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - It's gneomI 05:32, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - Oh how I love this article, if I had the time I'd write one similar for horror & comedys.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 06:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - This has just been waiting to be made since the beginning of Uncyclopedia. However, it could be a tad shorter and have a couple more images.--Aforanarchy
- For - Lots of grammar
misfooosagemisusage. Another the good, but work needs to improve. Nice! --Blahshoe 02:31, 8 February 2007 (UTC) - Activate the Photonic Nano-Tachyon Quantum Forometer --Nydas 12:11, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. I laughed the whole way through. --Emmzee 13:59, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Zyrac 21:34, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. A lot better than I thought it was going to be when I read the title. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:17, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's getting too many votes, and taking away from my article! Which is so much... oh, Forget it. El Zoof 05:37, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Back-in-time warp retroactive yet void for. So long but yet so consistently funny. Too bad this vote doesn't count. Or does it... --So So 18:01, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Intelligent design
Featured —rc (t) 06:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- For and submit I feel that this is a very well laid out article filled with clever and ironic jokes from the start and throughout. Plus, I believe it shows beyond a shadow of a reasonable doubt, that Intelligent Designerists are correct in everything they say. Weri long wang 19:30, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 20:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, as before, but more so.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. John1728 10:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, Seems pretty funny, good political undertones PowerBlind
- Against, too long...--HP FP talk 17:43, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- (like your signature)Weri long wang 19:36, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, I like the overall feel of the article. --J. Fuckin Kyle
(talk) 02:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, though I disapprove of Weri long wang's heckling of Hawthorn Peebles. Hawthorn can vote any way he wants, Weri. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's ok, I twy not to mwake fwun of pweeple wiff nick impediments...User:Hawthorn Peebles/sig 07:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- I critized his signature, which is a bit too long. That has nothing to do with his against votes for all articles without reasonable explanations - it’s like he has OCD or something.Weri long wang 13:06, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- That's ok, I twy not to mwake fwun of pweeple wiff nick impediments...User:Hawthorn Peebles/sig 07:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:33, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For BerogenVFH 13:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- For nice to see some in depth satire. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:24, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against More of a jibe at religion then true comedy. Could have been a really good article. --Sharky 14:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Review now; Still think its a jibe? --Endgame 08:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Why haven't I voted on this articamacle yet? --Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 21:06, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 00:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against -- 23:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Because of the Inteligent design in the classroom picture 01:11, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. 15Mickey20 12:55, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 01:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Support --Endgame 08:13, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- What can I say? intolerance + cliche + not funny = Against! --Nerd42Talk 22:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- For -- Funny + intolerance against stupidity gets my support. Bob Fleming 17:11, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Brilliant. This is a very well crafted article. --Emmzee 13:26, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For I love this article. it's my favorite.--72.81.209.68 01:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - This was a really good article and is definelty feature worthy,the book about alchemy was pretty funny too lol. A bit long but definetly a good article, although I think Evilution is funnier, I guess I'm biased in favour of my own articles lol --Uncle J 21:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For We need to get this featured before it gets Darwin'd. Great article, by the way. -- 23:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Quite appropriate satire.--Jsemmens 02:02, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Shortcut
Featured —rc (t) 07:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nom and For. Don't think this had a fair crack of the whip (missus) and is a well written, nicely laid out bundle of fun. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 23:25 Feburary 2007 (EST)
- For. I'll get there eventually.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 23:36, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Just good classic funniness. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 00:27, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- 4. --L 04:01, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:30, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:39, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For - Hopefully this won't need to be nominated again. It deserves featuring. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 11:10, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For, again. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Well-written, and made me laugh. Nice to see these QFH articles getting recognized.--Procopius 14:15, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:55, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Freaking genius. --Emmzee 13:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 21:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. I remember liking this one, very much. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 00:32, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For letting me get to the top of Mt. Everest in 5 seconds.
--High General Grue 02:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Never forget the 9th November attacks. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 05:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 18:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- For Well, we're going along--- BOOOM! Up it goes! '''The Humbled Master''' 01:04, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- For -- It's gneomI 06:08, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Witch-Hunting For Fun and Profit
Featured —rc (t) 07:06, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- N+F and anyone who votes against is a damn pinko! - Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 17:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - As I understand it a lot of work went into this fine piece of work. You can tell. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:56, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 00:48, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 01:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 08:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:37, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 19:35, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment ~ Collaboration if I ever saw it. If I vote yes, who wins? Ketei, Mhaille, The Bard or Tompkins? Or do they split the winnings? :) --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 14:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Very funny. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 18:17, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. --KATIE!! 21:36, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. 34 of those words were mine. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 21:58, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For because it propagates the myth that you can kill witches. --Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 22:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. BerogenVFH 14:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yay, 19:55, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose How is this supposed to be funny? "Witch-Hunting For Fun and Profit has seen many editions with numerous authors adding to it, keeping it forever relevant and up-to-date. The original manuscript is said to have been based on the journals of Tomás de Torquemada. Since then, it has been passed down generation to generation, notable contributions made by Samuel Parris, Betty Parris, Abigail Williams, William Griggs, and Joseph McCarthy." It has a section just for this. --Endgame 22:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yes Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:53, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Cause it sucked slightly less than Baron Ringpiece. Heh, just kidding, Mhaille. --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 22:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Fur I rather enjoyed this bally great article. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:14, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
George W. Bush
Featured —rc (t) 06:28, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- N+F. A perfect article for the new chaingun VFH.--Procopius 18:39, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 20:36, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- for. huzzah, actually clever and funny writing about bush - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- For So good that it's almost a shame to highlight it, since that will inevitably mean people messing with it. --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 01:02, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against Sorry, it's just not hitting the nerve for me... -- 01:25, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment According the the VFH archives (check the oldest ones), this article was already featured (on March 14th, 2005). --Composure1 04:19, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For an original way of mocking him. The previous version that was featured was what is know known as George Dubya Bush, before it was moved to the new location to make way for this page. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 06:57, 9 Jan 2007
- For, it's the article I would have written if I had any idea what I was doing.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:05, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - this is actually really nicely done - David Gerard 08:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - was this article featured? GSPbeetle complains Vandalisms 10:19, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For —Braydie at 19:33, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Hosanna to the Son of George Bush! The Humbled Master 23:51, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Subtle and funny. --So So 01:50, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against...this is a snub of the previously featured and hilarious George Dubya Bush. Sorry, its not funny, its just a bio. --HP FP talk 18:05, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Our Great Leader deserves to be honored as such. -- Rei 19:47, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- For proof that community projects CAN work (never thought I'd ever see this many people vote for Bush, though...).--<<>> 03:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. A good satire of Fox News more thann Georgie.--Emmzee 16:13, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- For (My first and only vote for this fiend). Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:31, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong against. Mainly because I'm liberal. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 02:08, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- For, and we should probably unfeature/delete the other GWB article. It is teh suck. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. 725 days, 6 hours, 25 minutes. goshzillacorrespondence 10:34, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- 4. --L 16:05, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- FOR- STRONGLY! His Serene Highness and Excellency George Wonderful Bush LOL :D Feureau 00:28, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. - Lemon. 23:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Perhaps we should feature God of Bullshit instead? goshzillacorrespondence 01:07, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- For InfiniteMonkey 18:35, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Peyton Manning
Featured, Apparently (sort of) There's no point in further voting, as it was already featured. I'm stealing Rc's job because Crazyswordsman got to do the template. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:45, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Self-Nom and For. If we can't get this featured in time for his next playoff loss, maybe we can get this featured in time for the Super Bowl. That is, of course, assuming this article is worthy.--<<>> 02:04, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak For -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:17, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - David Gerard 08:41, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong For. Very funny, and I actually like Peyton Manning (even as the Steelers' fan that I am).--Procopius 15:40, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 18:57, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - Zaui ⌘ TALK MUN ╬ - 19:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 20:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against whine whine whine --HP FP talk 17:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against The "Editor's Note" section is funny, but other than that, not that funny. --GAMESPOT=666 22:38, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Very weak For Maybe I'm just being generous because it's football season.--Gaberou 02:34, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For He threw three interceptions and still beat the Chiefs. I hate him. -- 02:37, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. goshzillacorrespondence 16:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- For He got tripped by one of his own linemen and still beat the Patriots. I hate him. The Humbled Master 23:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Although I know nothing about football.. I somehow found this funny. It's probably the narration/rant style that I love. —Braydie at 00:43, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Let's see if Peyton can win the superbowl and get featured on Uncyclopedia all int he smae day we should save this for after the superbowl win or lose it'll be timely.--71.72.210.124 03:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oppose I can't find the humor for this to be an FA article. --Endgame 07:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Not because it's good, but because we want to overhype him so he'll lose the Superbowl. I hate, hate, hate, Peyton Manning. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 23:25, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For despite the strange shaped balls. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 22:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- For What do I know about football? Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 03:05, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against Maybe I don't get football. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:59, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
Vietnam War Hoax
Featured —rc (t) 06:22, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
- Self Nom and For I really enjoyed writing this article, and a great picture by Mhaille improves it even futher. —Braydie at 15:51, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- FOR --Winstanley1 17:54, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against...not funny...conspiracy theory 101...--HP FP talk 19:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment:...images are great, but the article needs to follow... User:Hawthorn Peebles/sig 07:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against Good, yes, but not great. The images, however, are top-notch. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- For; this is good, but the fantastic images are what really make it glisten in the moonlight. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:02, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- For - fabulous! - David Gerard 01:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Ha-HA! The Humbled Master 01:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- For it made me laugh (though inside I'm still crying). Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 12:13, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 03:04, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- for - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:45, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Missing...something. It either needs to be more paranoid, or more straightlaced. Or something else entirely.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against as per discussions of third picture's entry on VFP. BerogenVFH 13:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. A picture is no reason to vote against an article. Don't make me add it to the rules, come up with a better reason. t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- For per Berogen ; ) -- 01:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment wikipedia:Snuff_film#Problems_of_definition. Perhaps we should seek a full and frank definition from our generous hosts. BerogenVFH 12:40, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Against Brilliant idea, but tone of article needs to sound more expository. Ethereal 05:38, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yay, 19:53, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 23:48, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Against Fantastic idea, needs to be built on some more.--Shas 22:22, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
- For It is very nubile. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:07, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- For Very original. --TheSlyFox 08:57, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- herr doktor needsAshuttle [scream!] 03:25, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. Wow, sometimes the truth is funnier than fiction... My solicitor has advised me to state that in this article, this is not the case. -- Hindleyite Converse 19:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- For.--Sir Silent Penguin "your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 20:11, 30 January 2007 (UTC)--84.66.31.112 20:10, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
- For. -- Mitch 17:25, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sucky Sucky For Dorrar --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 22:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
- For--Shandon 00:22, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Andorin Kato 01:06, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. - Could be one of the best articles of 2007. It's gneomI 08:21, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
- For. Real votes for this article? Nope all photoshopped 17:42 PST, 2 February 2007 Weasel3689 (UTC)