Uncyclopedia:Potatochopper of the Month/winners

2014

Official Nominations for February

Macboswell (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5

1. Nom & For Because of this. Last time someone won this was over a year ago and I bet you didn't even remember this award existed. I know I didn't. Anyway, this is a good opportunity to revive the long-forgotten PotM award and as we all know, more awards = good. Hope to see more of the same from Macboswell. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 12:54, February 24, 2014 (UTC)
2. For. !!! Anton (talk) 15:08, February 24, 2014 (UTC)
3. For.Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:00, March 1, 2014 (UTC)
4. For. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:02, March 2, 2014 (UTC)
5. He's good I guess maybe. --ShabiDOO 22:20, March 22, 2014 (UTC)

2012

June

Bizzeebeever (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Why do I look so happy? Is it because today's my birthday? No. It's because I cut a hole in the table. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jun 5 '12 12:10 (UTC)

Score: 5 assiduous rodents

• For. Seeing as it's customary in times of Chop-onomic downturn to give the currently most awesome chopper on the site several of these awards, and seeing as BB currently not only takes the cake in that department, but cooks the cake himself, takes it, and repeatedly rapes it with his ridiculously enormous realistically photoshopped dong, I'd say another one of these is in order. -RAHB 03:33, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

  Oh, RAHB. Will you never learn to say something without making it sound like a challenge? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Tue, Jun 5 '12 12:10 (UTC)

• For. ---   TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 03:38, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 03:44, 5 June 2012
• For. Mattsnow 04:44, June 5, 2012 (UTC)
• For. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:19, June 5, 2012 (UTC)

March

Unununium (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• He chopped a great one here! Bizzee's great too! Mattsnow 23:20, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
• For (cause I'm greedy). I am also rather pleased with this image I chopped in this, the month of March. ◄► Tephra ◄► 23:35, March 30, 2012 (UTC)
• For. Unununium! Aleister 00:52 31-3-'12

1. Sure ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:16, March 31, 2012 (UTC)

2011

December

Bizzeebeever (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -2

• Nom and for. What a dedicated chap Mattsnow 03:54, December 3, 2011 (UTC)
• Against. He just got this. He's good, but he's not that good. Also, I'll change this vote when someone nominates someone else.

1234 ~ 07:57, 3 December 2011

• Against. per Lyrithya. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 08:59, December 3, 2011 (UTC)

  Can you win an award with a negative score? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:07, 15 December 2011

  Not anymore. Minimum of +5 -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:29, December 15, 2011 (UTC)

• Against. Per Mimo. -- 01:48, December 16, 2011 (UTC)

November

Bizzeebeever (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +10

• Nom. Made some decent images, including a redo of the FP award thing that looks much more three-dimensional, though also much more like it's made of plastic. Considering this is Uncyclopedia, however, that actually sort of fits. So... yeah. Images, eh?

1234 ~ 22:51, 15 November 2011

• And For.; did other good ones since and also is open to constructive criticism; that's always good. I remembered to do this! Whoo! Sort of.

1234 ~ 04:48, 1 December 2011

• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:57, November 15, 2011 (UTC)
• Duh. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:51, 24 November 2011
• Oh que oui! Mattsnow 12:48, November 24, 2011 (UTC)
• I saw him chop an image once... -- 18:42, November 24, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Spuds. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 19:05, November 25, 2011 (UTC)
• Hell Yeah Irrelevant vote. I understand and I wish to continue. . 09:49, November 27, 2011 (UTC)
• I suppose so ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:03, November 27, 2011 (UTC)
• definitely --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 16:25, November 28, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Bandwagons are for jumping on. 2K12_DAN.VRS 22:26, November 28, 2011 (UTC)

HauntedUndies (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1 votes, because one of mine is worth six of yours, fuckers.

• Why? I don't want to win something without any competition, that's why. Also, HauntedUndies stole an idea right out of my head. I was totally going to do that for my page, until I saw he'd done it first. Bastard.  ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Mon, Nov 28 '11 15:55 (UTC)

July

MeepStarLives (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

1. Nom. I like his work! Mattsnow 18:07, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

1. Nom and for. I like his work too! Mattsnow 18:07, July 19, 2011 (UTC)
2. Zombiebaron ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:06, July 21, 2011 (UTC)

Magic man (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

1. Need I mention I like his work? Mattsnow 18:07, July 19, 2011 (UTC)

June

Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

1. Nom Going for the encore. He chops potatoes well and fast, in symetrical slices. Mattsnow 12:18, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
2. Fur -- 14:54, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
3. For. -- - Big★Duck ☭ 03:51, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
4. For. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 03:53, June 7, 2011 (UTC)

MeepStarLives (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

1. Nom+For I like ZB, but I have to go with Meep for shopping a great one for me: Mattsnow 20:39, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Original.

Result after rape.

1. For Nice to see him back and chopping again. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:44, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

   Good to see you take my defection with a grain of salt, ZB. This article will chant the glory of the work you did for me, I'd say tentatively in the following week, dear Zombie. Mattsnow 05:41, June 25, 2011 (UTC)

2. Blood.

1234 ~ 23:43, 30 June 2011

May

Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Dude. For.

1234 ~ 22:01, 13 May 2011

• Totally. --^Dame 22:28, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

April

Magic man (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +6

• Nomfor. While it's hard to tell since, like a lot of people around here, he doesn't seem to want to link his sources, this guy seems pretty decent, and he does seem to be improving. Seems to be.

1234 ~ 01:46, 18 April 2011

• I don't link my sources, eh? I'll go do that right now. Anyway, thanks for the nom! -- 14:45, April 19, 2011 (UTC)

  Thanks, mon.

1234 ~ 16:41, 30 April 2011

• For Earned his first featured image a few minutes ago, and came in third at the Best Image category of this year's Zombiebaron Imagery Extra Va Gan Za. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:25, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
• For.. Excellent work on the Moses pic. (Er... I should probably get to the whole source linking thing myself, thanks for the reminder Lyrithya.) --^Dame 13:23, April 28, 2011 (UTC)

  Yay!

1234 ~ 16:41, 30 April 2011

• For. -- Frosty dah snowguy 10:21, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
• For. He potatochops with style and aplomb. --Black Flamingo 11:36, April 29, 2011 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 05:02, 30 April 2011

March

Sonje (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• Nom and For Made not 1(File:Chandler's orient express.jpg) but (File:Castaway crusoe.jpg) 3 (File:Rd abridged classics.jpg) great images for me inside a week which I'd be able to link to if i wasn't such an utter retard.--Sog1970 15:52, March 4, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Although widely honored in 2009, hasn't "won" this since. She could win every month, but she should at least win it some months! Aleister 23:54 4-3-'11
• She's better than Prettiestpretty. Usually. I mean... anyhow, if someone deserves this fwace or... er... you know what I mean. Nevermind.

1234 ~ 20:01, 31 March 2011

February

Mimo&maxus (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6

• Nome& For. Ever since Mimo got here four months ago he has uploaded his own chops, and other people's pics, onto the site on a daily basis. Lots of very good work in his portfolio. And he may be loony too, which is always a plus. Aleister 18:24 2-1-'11
• For. He deserves it. Someone
• For. This. -- 01:05, February 2, 2011 (UTC)
• For. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:50, February 6, 2011 (UTC)
• You down with O.P.P.? — 
• For. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:31, February 24, 2011 (UTC)

January

Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3 ambiguations

• Nom. Well, 'e is pretty swell.

1234 ~ 09:39, 16 January 2011

• He's the best -- 15:12, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
• YEAH I thought it was me at first, but aw, what the hell! -- 02:04, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
• best of the best! —Preceding signed comment added by Airhogs777 (talk • contribs • WP) 23:46, January 20, 2011 (UTC)

PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• Nom & For I think many of us sometimes overlook what Puppy does here, with chopping, with code creations of amazing ability (photochopping in a pure form), with things unseen and unsaid that would be the mountain on the horizon at almost any other wiki. A few people have won this twice, Puppy should join their ranks and then share coding secrets with them. Aleister 2:17 18-1-'11
• Aw, hells, 'sa truth... he's ready.

1234 ~ 02:39, 18 January 2011

• I have to say that, from my perspective, I'm winning.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Tuesday, 02:50, Jan 18 2011 UTC

• For! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:38, 30 January 2011
• For. Puppy: Now you're losing and winning at the same time! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:38, January 31, 2011 (UTC)

2010

December

Joe9320 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom ^&^ For Peeking at the names who won this I stared, refreshed the page a few times, stared again, rested, then realized that yes, it was true, King Joseph has not won this yet. I might be mistaken. There is no way to tell without a microscope. Aleister 10:49 5 12

Sonje (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom. She's amazing, and stuff. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101205 - 12:10 (UTC)

  Sonje or MeepStar, one of them would get this every month if the voting was for the best of the best. Then we'd have no other winners, and the world would be a sadder place. Except Sonje's and Meepstar's world, where joy would reign. Aleister 12:41 5 12

RadicalX (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0 default answers

• Nom. Because. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101205 - 12:10 (UTC)

  Ah, he's been almost MIA for a year now, only seen once since January and that was to remove a blank space. A genius, a legend, but not here lately, and already has lots of these. 'Aleister 12:37 5 11

Sockpuppet of an unregistered user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Socky made her blackish.

Score: 7 registered users

• Nom. I guess he does artsy things. I dunno. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) • (stalk) -- 20101205 - 12:10 (UTC)

  For. He does do things... O___O

1234 ~ 07:00, 9 December, 2010

• For. He does indeed. --^Dame 09:40, December 9, 2010 (UTC)
• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:01, December 9, 2010 (UTC)
• For This maybe is none of my business, but he have really cool stuff. And maybe because he voted AND nominated me for the Notm-prize, so... My mine turn! Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone...

  Why wouldn't it be any of your business? If a fellow does good, by all means, vote, regardless of how much or little you play into the site as a whole. On the other hand, voting for someone just because they voted for you on something else tends to be frowned upon...

1234 ~ 19:57, 14 December 2010

• I thought its non of mine business, `cause i thought that only admins can vote... But i was wrong, i see. - Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone...

  Oh, gods... if that was the case... *shudders* This place would not be what it is, that's for sure. Admins are demented. So yeah, you're fine.

1234 ~ 06:18, 16 December 2010

• That's a good idea actually. We should hold a vote to see if in the future only admins should be allowed to vote. Naturally only admins would be allowed to vote on wether or not only admins should be allowed to vote. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:33, December 16, 2010 (UTC)

  And that kind of reasoning is exactly why such a policy would be so bad...

1234 ~ 22:09, 16 December 2010

• For. --M&M (christmas mood) 08:42, December 16, 2010 (UTC)
• He's had a couple of featured images and that blackish girl is hot, so for. --Black Flamingo 15:19, December 17, 2010 (UTC)
• Can you guess what this is? I also got Batman locked up in Arkham, put Jesus's head on a couple dinosaurs, threw a pie at Thomas Huxley, climbed Linda Ronstadt dressed as Spider-Man, made Mao's kitty ears pointier, used a balalaika as a spaceship, convinced an old couple an elephant could easily fit inside their fridge, put Handel's house on top of the Saale river, made a portrait of Handel in all his Handel-ly glory, turned Abe into a babe, mostly, crossed an angel with a sperm whale and discovered a person exists with the name "Orly", among other things. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:19, 17 December 2010

  I knew you'd more than everyone thought, including me. --Black Flamingo 16:23, December 17, 2010 (UTC)

• For. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 13:49, December 27, 2010 (UTC)

November

Sonje (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2 in the pink

• Nom. She's gotten it three times already, yes, but she has also recently made good stuff. Very, very, very few people can make that claim these days. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101108 - 06:16 (UTC)

  I make that claim all the time. --Black Flamingo 11:45, November 17, 2010 (UTC)

  Oh... nevermind. >.< ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101117 - 16:09 (UTC)

• For. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:52, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
• For. Because she didn't get this last month? *is confused* ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101125 - 20:23 (UTC)

RadicalX (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0 default answers

• Nom. Eh, why not. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101108 - 06:16 (UTC)
• For, because he's only won this award twice. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 10:13, November 25, 2010 (UTC)

Lyrithya (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5 Jimmy Wales Templates

• Nome & Fleur In addition to other great pics, made all the Jimmy Wales Templates which have graced Uncy's entranceway this last week. If not this month, next month in Jerusalem. Aleister 10:19 25 11
• For, yeah those banners are much better than the crappy banner I made. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 10:23, November 25, 2010 (UTC)

  Ah, my bad. The banner trend started with Zombiebaron, whose work was ruthlessly tossed aside and left to rot on the roadside by the other banners. Life is not fair, said Saddam, who had given up his weapons years before and proved it with a ton of paperwork--but that is a tale for another day. Aleister 11:17 25 11

• I've really enjoyed L's work so far. S/he should spend more time over at UN:PIC. --Black Flamingo 11:01, November 25, 2010 (UTC)
• Ah, hells... I'm so pretty. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101125 - 18:39 (UTC)

  I just found out that this award is about images, not being pretty. Dammit. Where's the prettiness award? ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101125 - 20:23 (UTC)

• For. She made the Jimmy Wales templates?!?!? M&M (also known as Mimo&maxus) What do you want? Wanna see my balls? 18:59, November 25, 2010 (UTC)

  The ones here, yes... Olipro actually got them to work, though, since Wikia, ah... sucks? Something like that. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101125 - 19:29 (UTC)

• For. Because she hasn't won this yet. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:01, 29 November 2010

October

RadicalX (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3 default answers

• Nom & For Because it is no longer September and we need a winner. And because RadicalX is still behind Sonje. Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 02:29, October 3, 2010 (UTC)

Probably an October nomination. September be long gone down a dark path in the woods. If it is for Ocober, For. I hope this amazing and helpful user comes back! Aleister 14:35 4 10, edited 10 10

Yeah, you're right. Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 23:37, October 7, 2010 (UTC)

• For. And there is a tie. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:52, October 17, 2010 (UTC)
• Zombiebaron. RadicalX is legendary and world famous. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:23, October 28, 2010 (UTC)

Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7 Zombiebaron

• Nom & For I agree that RadX needs to overtake me as I am midget in the shadow of his awesomeness. But this is true for Zombiebaron also, and he is active again, which is brilliant and he is churning out awesome pics at RadicalX's Corner like crazy. Awesomeness + activeness should always be appreciated. --^Dame 13:36, October 8, 2010 (UTC)
• For, changed vote My ignorance allowed me (bad, bad, ignorance) to think that RadicalX's corner meant that Radical X was doing lots of pic there. Used to be true, not true lately. Sonje has convinced me, in her brief visit above, to switch my vote. Aleister 11:46 10 10
• Okay. Since he's actually doing requests and stuff. ~ *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20101018 - 23:33 (UTC)
• For. And next month it's Lyrithya's turn! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:18, 22 October 2010
• For.--Funnybony  19:34, Oct 22
• He's back and kicking bottom. --Black Flamingo 20:14, October 22, 2010 (UTC)
• For.----Mimo 07:20, October 24, 2010 (UTC)

August

RabbiTechno (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9

• Nom and For. Rabbi's BIBLE! article is a masterwork of images weaved into a series of believable magazine covers. He gave me back my faith. And for many other very good images throughout his pages. Aleister 20:55 14 8
• Definitely. I wondered who made those images for BIBLE!, they really were some of the funniest I've ever seen. --Black Flamingo 21:50, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

• I am, quite literally, speechless - I consider myself fairly rubbish at photoshopping. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 13:22, August 15, 2010 (UTC)

• The fact that you consider yourself rubbish only speaks to your eye for such things, good sir. ~ Arajlas *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100816 - 03:02 (UTC)

• And screw it, for. ~ Arajlas *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100816 - 03:02 (UTC)
• For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:05, August 22, 2010 (UTC)
• For, Indeed.. Does such good work around here in other areas (especially with regard to the portals), and an expert photomanipulator, too? --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 23:46, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
• For Go Rabbi! -^Dame 18:57, August 27, 2010 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:00, 28 August 2010
• For Certainly!--Funnybony  13:50, Aug 30
• Yeah.--HM (T) 21:48, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

July

MeepStarLives (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5

• Nom and For. Meep has won this already, but he has been constantly creating great images and doing image requests. Go him.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Friday, 01:49, July 02 2010 UTC
• Never voted on this before. But this Meep guy is consistenly awesome (or is that "awesomely consistent"?). Either way, For.. --Black Flamingo 21:42, July 17, 2010 (UTC)
• For I've looked at his work earlier last week, studying, always studying. Nice work! Well done. Aleister 16:57 19 7
• For! He made a beautiful image for me. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:47, 29 July 2010
• For. There are like almost no open requests at the corner, this guy is impressive. -^Dame 01:09, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

June

PuppyOnTheRadio (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 10

• Nom and For Just looked at the list of winners and it was like, "Whaaaaat?" Puppy hasn't won this yet! It seems he manipulates images and code daily, and can probably illustrate an infinite number of angels dancing on a pinhead in his sleep. Aleister in Chains 11:14 1 6 MMX

• Infinite number of angels... Now that would be a challenge... Did you want that as png or svg?                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 Thursday, 12:15, Jun 3 2010 UTC

gif Al sans chains 23:35 3 6 mmx

• For.--Funnybony  18:02, Jun 4
• For. ---Maniac1075^{Complain Here} 12:34, June 8, 2010 (UTC) Compared to the other nominated potm's so far, his work is standing out above the rest!
• For.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Thursday, 06:23, June 17 2010 UTC
• Yes —Pelozurian (talk) 21:40, 17 June 2010 (UTC)
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:56, 17 June 2010
• Word. --Matfen 09:46, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
• For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 16:55, June 29, 2010 (UTC)
• Australia lol SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 13:14, June 19, 2010 (UTC)

May

Nachlader (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +6

• Nom and For. Nachlader puts chops on most of his pages, and his golf ball hitting the side of the World Trade Center is worth this award all by itself. Aleister in Chains 2:18 15 5 MMX
• Ok --Hopelessly Devoted To You... ¡¡¡Silent civilian!!! 22:30, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
• Sorry for stealing WotM from you this month. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 22:35, May 19, 2010 (UTC)
• For His Golf War pics, along with his others, are quite sufficient for this vote. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 09:37, May 29 2010
• Pacman. Per not being me. - ho scopato tua madre nel culo - 13:10,29May,2010
• For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:15, 29 May 2010

April

Nachlader (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom and For Nobody nommed as yet, and Nach is as good as anyone here. See his Golf War and Firearm attachments for just some of the photoshop's he's done, both long long ago and very recently. Apparantly he photoshops mostifnotall of his images, which is something I couldn't do if the Queen of England asked me to give a command performance (I just try to use little- or never-used images). So I'll continue my Nach lovefest this month by nomming him here too, and well deserved work N. Aleister sans Chains 16:01 10 4 MMX

CheddarBBQ (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• NomforCaptain's order. SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 16:28, April 10, 2010 (UTC)
• For--Funnybony  14:53, Apr 13

RadicalX (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom & For-- As it stands, Sonje has more PotM awards than him. This must be corrected. Immediately. Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 01:37, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
• Comment. Or take the obvious solution, and just make it Uncyclopedia:Sonje's Corner - ho scopato tua madre nel culo - 03:13,11April,2010

Maniac1075 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nom Wow! See my note at Writer of the Month. In going over his stuff it seems every article he's worked on has his chops on it, over and over, and on and on. What a gem in the landscape of Uncy. Here, again, I Salute! thee. Aleister in Chains 21:15 13 4 MMX
• Strong for I actually started noticing his articles about a month ago, and though he's a bit too old for NotM he is definitely one of the best spiritual noobs here. —Pelozurian (talk) 14:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
• For.--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 00:13, April 17, 2010 (UTC)

March

Funnybony (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6

• Nom and For Funnybony hasn't won this yet? Is the world upside down? Well, there might be many others deserving this month, but Funnybony's quick and creative chop of the South American map for his Unnews about this weekend's Chilian Earthquake is, imnho, quick-response humour at its finest. ~   20:12 27 2 MMX
• Consistently good. Well deserved.                                • Puppy's talk page • 00:40, June 5, 2009 11:38, 1/03/2010
• Against. the fact that I didn't even get nommed for this yet. But For. Funnybones. - ho scopato tua madre nel culo - 00:01,2March,2010
• For. Why the fuck not?--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 21:05, March 18, 2010 (UTC)
• Aye. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 15:07, Mar 19 2010
• For. per above. --Mn-z 16:25, March 19, 2010 (UTC)
• YES -- Skinfan13 11:35 EST 31 Mar, 2010

CheddarBBQ (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0

• Nom. Per the "how has he not been nommed for this yet?" clause. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:01, March 5, 2010 (UTC)
• Holy Shit If someone noms me for NOTM, I'll be able to lose all 4 major awards in one month! - ho scopato tua madre nel culo - 20:13,5March,2010

January

DrStrange (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2

• Nom and for During Doc's January run of 6 features in 10 days, a couple more featured, and even more written, he has photoenhanced/manipulated two complete comic books, a newsletter, and, on and on, he did so many that I can't even remember them all. This was in January alone. That, and he had to fend off Stan Lee. Aleister in Chains 22:21 30 Jan. MMX
• Obvious For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:15, 1 February 2010

2009

December

MeepStarLives (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 10

• Nom and For. This user absolutely deserves this. Evidence? You want evidence now? One word: Bilight. I rest my case. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 07:16, Dec 4 2009
• Fuck that.. Look at this!. ~ 11:10, December 5, 2009 (UTC)
• OMG  –      (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 07:33, 8 December 2009
• 100 (That's 4 in binary) --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 03:54, December 9, 2009 (UTC)

  Nerd. --SIR Pretentious Loser (Have a mocha cappuccino and a sit down) 21:48, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

  HA! EASILY BEATEN! IF $F(x)=3x^{2}+90x+59$ THEN $\int _{6}^{10}F(x)\,dx=3900$ --Invincibleflamegruemaster 04:12, 12 11, 2009

  ...Nerd. --SIR Pretentious Loser (Have a mocha cappuccino and a sit down) 01:19, December 13, 2009 (UTC)

  YUP! --Invincibleflamegruemaster 17:55, 12 13, 2009

• Yep SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 04:29, December 11, 2009 (UTC)
• For per above. --Mn-z 20:06, December 17, 2009 (UTC)
• Yes per above. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:31, 13 December 2009
• YEESS per below --Killer_3.14 21:58, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
• A Tiger Roarrr I'd like to print out the Tiger Woods graphic and trick Tiger into signing it, with video for proof. MeepStarLives put a Tiger in her tank. Aleister in Chains 21:30, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Why not? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 08:14, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

September

Modusoperandi (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 3

• nom seems to be doing a few images requests and has only won the award once. --Mn-z 16:40, September 9, 2009 (UTC)
• For. Hoping to usher in the smallest margin of victory in PotM history. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:57, September 26, 2009 (UTC)
• Oh very very For, Modus is like my hero and stuff. --^Dame 14:25, September 27, 2009 (UTC)
• I realized that nearly all of my features have a Modus piece on them. So indeed. Give it to im. ~ 14:31, September 27, 2009 (UTC)
• Yes --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 04:32, September 28, 2009 (UTC)

August

SunnyChow (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 6

• nom and for. Has made the feature image WikiSphere and uncyclo-tans. --Docile hippopotamus 07:54, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:32, Aug 6
• For - Rbpolsen ♦ 01:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
• For; he made all of those uncyclo-tans, and he made Game:My Untune Hero. I think this award is the least we can do to pay him back for his hard work. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:07, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
• For--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 21:59, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
• For. Uncyclo-Tan --Mn-z 18:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

July

RadicalX (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1 vote for equality

1. Nom and For Because Sonje currently has more PotM's than RadX, and that is an insult to the legend that is RadX. Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 02:25, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5 zombiebarons

1. Nom & For. Zombiebaron has actually manipulated an image this month! Shock! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:23, Jul 22
2. For I would like to see more from him. Staircase CUN^t 00:23, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
3. For Like Stairs says. --ChiefjusticeDS 14:08, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
4. Oh so very for! Zombiebaron's return makes me excessively happy :D --^Dame 12:34, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
5. Zombiebaron. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

June

KneeChee27 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1 nomination and 1 Sonje approval

• No nominations yet? Weird. Okay, so KneeChee hasn't been around much this month, but he certainly deserves to get this award for what he's done so far. Nom. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:50, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
• For He has won this before but I reckon he deserves another one. That paradox pic was gold! --^Dame 13:09, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Sonje (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3

• Nom and For — It's been a quieter month, but I haven't seen anyone as consistently hardworking or as unquestionably talented. Plus, she's enormously kind, polite and likable. --T. (talk) 12:55, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

  We all know how lovable Sonje is, but she already won it two consecutive times. And she's the one that nommed KneeChee last month. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:04, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Then someone else really should show up for work, and make an honest effort to kick her off the stump. --T. (talk) 13:11, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

Do what now? I think I'm fine appearing and disappearing at seemingly random intervals. As for who I think should get this award: Sonje. I'm not nearly as dedicated or consistent as her. I won't, however, vote for Sonje, simply because that would tie up the scores and make the whole process a lot messier. Of course, if one other person votes for her, I'll easily change this into a For vote (if I'm even around to notice, that is). User:KneeChee27/sig2 01:15, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

• For She makes excellent images again and again. Staircase CUN^t 22:50, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
• For. Somebody else voted, tying the scores, and I happened to be around to notice, so here's my vote. User:KneeChee27/sig2 01:40, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

May

Not A Good Username360 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +9

• Nom+For. Per last month. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:24, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
• For per above. --Mnb'z 18:54, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
• For. Again. Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 00:39, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
• For. --Docile hippopotamus 02:53, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
• For Sonje is great, but credit has been given, time to pass it on to other noteable choppers. ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 02:58, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
• For. Namely because a majority of the stuff I've contributed recently have either been animated GIFs (i.e. there was no Photoshopping involved) or quickies that anybody could have done. -- User:KneeChee27/sig 01:25, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
• Bless.. I've nominated some of his works (though all have failed D:) —The Zhel 12:34, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
• Ra-approved per all above Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 07:22, May, 21 '09
• For MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:25, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Sonje (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

1. Nom+Drama. Per her epic skillz. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:17, May 5

1. Bless. although she never gives a flying rats ass to my image requests. Still, she is the best chopper around here. Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 02:55, 7 May '09

2 are enough, I guess Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 09:08, 8 May '09

1. For. Per all the favors she's done for me. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 04:33, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

KneeChee27 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 5

• Nom+For. This guy is one of the only other people filling requests at RadicalX's Corner and he has been doing a good job of it. He has also won the award before but considering the low volume of active choppers these days, activity, quality and usefulness should be credited. --^Dame 09:05, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Ouch. Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 00:04, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

I would've voted for you NAGU360, but you have been away for a while. I was just giving kudos for activity, not disrespecting you. You deserve this award too, I just don't think its been an active month for you. --^Dame 13:16, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

• He's new! He's good! And that's what I just needed. A new guy who can potatochop articles. I'm with him. |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Kemador CUN|IC Kill | 00:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
• +1 Crazy Padres Pitcher (talk) 22:35, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
• Bless. looks promising Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 22:55, 9 May '09

• he had it before. the other guy didnt Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 07:20, May, 21 '09

• Comment. Guys, he's not new; in fact, he's already won this before. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:36, May 14

• For!!!! Won it before or not, KneeChee is a golden fucking God. I am humbled by his presence. -RAHB 23:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
• For, although I always read his name as KneeChees7. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 04:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

April

Sonje (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• Nom+For. Again! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:21, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Abstain. Not even RadX won this two times in a row, much less within 5 months of his account registration. I'd vote against, but my vote is better spent helping the next nomination. Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 23:09, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, you're probably right. Come to think of it, I'll nominate you as well... —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

• For -RAHB 23:11, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
• Can't Vote Against Dame Sonje Ya know, except that one time I voted against her.--Smokin' Cheddar BBQ: The King of the Triangular Snackfoods 11:40, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
• For. So what if RadicalX didn't win it twice in a row? Sonje is a good potatochopper, she deserves it. And if she keeps up the good work, I'll nom her next month, too *wink wink* 11:40, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Not A Good Username360 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 2

• Nomination. It turns out there are other people besides Sonje that have some impressive 'chopping skills. Among them is Not A Good Username360. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:16, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
• For. Because I can't not vote for myself. I don't think for a moment that I'll win, though, unless I can get at least one featured image. *picks up potatochopping axe* Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 00:45, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
• For. --Docile hippopotamus 01:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

March

Sonje (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 17 people who should be honored to be in RadicalX's competition

• Nom+For It's March so let's all start voting for Sonje. I think it's quite obvious she deserves this award. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 17:39, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
• For --Mnb'z 20:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
• W♥v per my promise last month. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
• Oh yes. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 20:54, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
• For -RAHB 03:30, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
• Yarp -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
• For. The Dong work is particularly lovely. --Guildensternenstein 05:51, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
• For. Excellent chopper, definitely deserves the award. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 15:59, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
• For. She sure knows a lot about dongs for a woman (not too inappropriate I hope =P) --Kit talk 17:25 6 March
• for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
• Poker hand was very funny and it is obvious she has skillz. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:44, Mar 18
• For. - Already racking up an impressive body of work on here.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:37, 19 March 2009 (UTC)
• For. -It's the latest fashion trend, to vote for Sonje. Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 18:59, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
• For. Completely superfluous vote, but a vote nonetheless. For being good and stuff. --UU - natter 09:54, Mar 23
• For. ~ 17:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
• Only person who makes decent images nowadays RadX would be proud --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 10:46, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
• For Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 03:39, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

February

Sonje (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 0 people who should be honored to be in RadicalX's competition

• Nomination. This guy's been chopping requests from the Corner, with fantastic results. Active and talented, this guy should definitely get it this or next month. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:32, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

  Sonje is a girl. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:38, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

  Also, I think she deserves this, but it might be better to hold of nom'ing her until March. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 00:40, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

  She's got my vote for March. —Sir SysRq (talk) 00:41, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

  Fuck genders. I use the royal "he" for just about anybody on the internet I don't know. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 00:46, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

RadicalX (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7 obvious (backup) choices

• Nom I'm holding on voting until I see if we have any new talent. But, if we don't have anyone worthy who has yet to win this, he deserves to win this multiple times. By the way, he has came back recently and done several image requests. --S'r Mnbvcxz 20:46, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
• I'm down Per his recent surge of Image Request activity. -RAHB 05:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
• Yesh. Because of his Giraffe pic. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:27, Feb 13
• For. Because nobody nom'd me, and his surge of activity. Sir Not A Good Username360 KUN 20:32, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
• So, he still hasn't won this twice? Seems like as good a time as any, seeing as how he's been, you know, doing stuff lately. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:55, 20 February 2009 (UTC)
• For.--Sycamore (Talk) 17:10, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
• For. Mhaille and Prettiestpretty have both won this twice, and they are very good. But neither of them is RadX. RadX hasn't won this twice, and he is RadX. Therefore, that needs to change. Pronto. That and he's been a machine again recently. --UU - natter 17:13, Feb 24
• for. wow, it makes me feel like a legend just being able to say "i voted for RadX for PotM". SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:28, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
• The Man. Now get your brother back, too so he can win WotM :D -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:45, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

January

Cows go moo when they poo (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: -1 MS Paint Potatochoppers

• Nom + 4 he came in second place last month. Plus, he produced this fine image, which clearly is an exhortation to Christians to "deny themselves and take up the cross" and seek after heavenly rewards. --Mnbvcxz 19:30, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• Against. - A little too talented in my view. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 19:36, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I'd consider changing my vote if there is someone who deserves it more. --Mnbvcxz 19:43, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

We don't need to hand these out (or any other awards) every month - lets give it time and let a noob with fireworks come along:) — Sir Sycamore (talk) 19:47, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Actually, Mnbvcxz's wish may be my command... --UU - natter 19:50, Jan 7

See, there was method to my madness, and madness to my method. --Mnbvcxz 19:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Skillen (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +8 actual 'choppers

• Nom & For. Has responded to requests on UN:PIC, and done rather well. Is active, isn't an MS Paint hack. A decent candidate, I feel. --UU - natter 19:50, Jan 7
• For per above. --Mnbvcxz 19:57, 7 January 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. Great job on the image requests, buddy! It's one of those things that we always need people doing, and it's cool to see someone being helpful around here for a change. However, I'm not thrilled with the image quality. I think this kid can do better, and so I'm going to abstain until I see some quality images that actually look like they were chopped by a PotM. Good job, maybe next month. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

I think its important to give out these awards every month, so they don't go idle. If there is not a new PotM worthy candidate, its better to give out the award to someone who already one it, or even give it out as a joke occasionally. --Mnbvcxz 04:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

I respectfully disagree. I feel that if young Skillen is going to win this award, it should be because he really earned it, not because the month he was nominated his only competition was CGMWTP. The integrity of the award is better preserved when we are willing to wait for talents to develop and when a truly deserving user comes along. I think Skillen is a good chopper, and he has the potential to be a great chopper. But I don't think he's quite there yet, and I would like to see him wait a month so that he can further develop his talent before he earns this award. I'm not all about handouts, I guess would be my main point. —Sir SysRq (talk) 21:13, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I concur with SysRq, this is too knee jerk.--Sycamore (Talk) 21:31, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I, for one, support knee jerk "coronation-votes". It makes the voting look active :) --Mnbvcxz 06:12, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

It's not about how things look. We're not here to put up a bunch of smoke and mirrors to make it appear as though we're something more than we really are. Uncyclopedia is what it is, and that's all that we should bother with letting people see. There's no use kidding ourselves. -RAHB 01:39, 17 January 2009 (UTC)

How do you except to get new writers with that attitude. Looking successful despite being an utter failure is one of the keys to becoming successful. --Mnbvcxz 17:13, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Bollocks--Sycamore (Talk) 17:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Nonsense, the only way this site will pick up is if we cheerlead our way to back to success. --Mnbvcxz 18:04, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

We carry on and we continue traditions. We just don't stop them, or postpone them just because some people who are as familiar as our favorite pairs of socks (and they are the best socks to wear) are off busy with other important work. No, we look forward, we make new friends, we encourage emerging talent. The talent is here, and we celebrate it for what it is. We are Uncyclopedians, and this is what we do. And we also don't toss our votes away on undeserving people to support some type of disgusting charade. We are not Belgians, we are Uncyclopedians! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:00, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Boo! reasonable compromise and moderation! Yah! knee-jerk reactionary-ism alternating with unhinged radicalism! --Mnbvcxz 19:15, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Without reason, you have nothing to unhinge from. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:59, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

• For per all of the above. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 23:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Cause im like that --Skillen 04:23, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
• Yes. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:09, Jan 13
• For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 19:00, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
• For Cool guy. -RAHB 09:53, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
• For ~SirTagstit • VFH • NotM • PEEING • CPT • RotM • BFF 06:50, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Modusoperandi (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1 Boobies upon Boobies

nom so Skillen has some actual competition besides CGMWTP and for making this image --Mnbvcxz 06:38, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
For. What Mnbvcxz said. --Docile hippopotamus 01:21, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

2008

November

Asahatter (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +4

1. Nom & For - Asahatter created a super funny image, the Chainsaw Charge. Not only was it hilarious, but it showed very good chopping skills too. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:46, Nov 5
2. W♥v. Heehee, I'm voting for PotM. sirsysrq @ 22:14 Nov 5
3. Aye.~ 22:29, 5 November 2008 (UTC)
4. For -RAHB 01:28, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

August

Digi (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2

• Nom and Floor Robbed last month by some damn acronym, I say we give it to him this month --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 07:24, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
• For I'm going to go with Digi because the images of Vitaloverdose have not impressed me, because I don not understand the humor in them. Evil Gerogr Bush Senior (WTF!?!) and that Emergancy Room (I don't get it) he self nommed for feature, both failing miserably. He has that smoking Bush one, that is the best but still average. So I'll go with Digi. ~ Readmesoon

Vitaloverdose (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +5

• Nom and FORE. Just look at the reefer desk lately--he's been chopping up a storm and doing it well. It's just a matter of time before he starts getting features. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 20:55, Aug 2
• Head and shoulders. For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For. Vital's image contributions thus far have a remarkably not-crappy quality. This makes the rest of us look bad. Also, because I'm smearing his good name (while voting for him, because I'm a riddle), I'm pretty sure that he's NXWave. Hitler too. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 21:33, 2 August 2008 (UTC)
• For Stuff -RAHB 00:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)
• For, because when I asked Saint Photoshop to deliver unto us an active manipulator, I didn't think he/she/it would be this good. Or this real. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:15, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

July

Digi (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• I really don't think we have enough people manipulating images here anymore. Full stop. Go take a stroll through the recently uploaded images. Its utter crap. That's why I was delightfully surprised to find the contributions of Digi there. While images like this, this, this, this, and this may not do very well on VFP, they are a breath of fresh air. Therefore, Digi at least deserves some of recognition, and this is how I choose to recognize his/her fine work. Nomination. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:40, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
• So what if they don't do too well on VFP? I like 'em. For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 19:53, Jul 8
• For Cause Rob already knows I love him. I love him a lot. I wanna touch him. But I can't. Police always show up before I can. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 00:41, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
• For Ah heavens, I may as well vote for myself as I'm greedy feeling like it.Digi 10:16, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
• FOR Needs some recognition for his work, RAHB is already getting UotM this month --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 08:21, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

RAHB (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +6

• What can I say about RAHB's images? Well, there are quite a few of them. I could list them, but I'm sure you've seen them. They crop up all over the place. Why? Well because they're good images. As I said in Digi's nomination (see above), there are far too few people manipulating images these days here at Uncyclopedia, and we should recognize those who do a good job. Therefore, I'll not only nominate RAHB, but I'll vote for him too. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:43, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
• Text-based vote -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:12, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
• Ah hell. I guess I'll vote for myself here. /me tries to think of something good to chop by the end of the month to keep the spirit alive -RAHB 09:23, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
• For. RAHB makes up for gross incompetence with quantity. That sounded better in my head. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 10:19, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
• for. eleven wide. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:22, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
• Please. sirsysrq @ 21:33 Jul 28

June

KneeChee27 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +5

• Nom & for. Active and helpful on image request, and has some decent work under his belt. May not have a featured image to his credit, but that hasn't stopped certain others winning this in the past. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:20, Jun 17
• Absolutlely f♥r. Sort of a quiet chopper. We don't hear too much from him, but he puts out great images like it's nobody's business. I've had the pleasure of doing business with this chap in the past and I couldn't be happier with the result. He's been tirelessly filling those image requests for a while now with no recognition, and I think it's high time we recognize this star chopper. sirsysrq @ 14:21 Jun 17
• For. From what I hear, Knee is one of those "tortured artiste" types. Cut off an ear and everything. Nose, too. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:52, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
• I agree. More artists SHOULD be tortured. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For -RAHB 08:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

March

Seeker (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +6

• Nom & For - Missed out last month, but has been helpful on image request and image review, has a featured image to his credit already, and basically is a damn fine all round 'chopper. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:01, Mar 1
• F♥r. I voted for him last month, and God knows I'll do it again! I'd do it a thousand times if I had to. This guy's earned it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:26 Mar 1
• For Might as well. --Sir Seeker (Call me?) |KUN|VFP| 22:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
• For Though I still disagree with a mere hand in a box becoming featured, but he has been great on the image request. -RAHB 07:07, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
• For he is. He simply is. DM-89 13:17, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• For Loved his contributions so far, much better than anything I used to do. --User:Lassaris/sig 20:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

Necropaxx (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +6

• Nom and For - Not only has Necropaxxx been doing the image thing for quite awhile now, but I also hate when awards have only one person nominated a month. Let's see some blood. Let's see some kind of bland melodrama. Or, let's see Seeker win, and then Necropaxxx get nominated next month by someone claiming that he "missed out last month, but has but has been helpful..." -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:43, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
• Alright. Then he'll get my vote next month, since he has certainly done a lot to deserve it. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 22:46 Mar 3
• F☭R
• For, just to be difficult. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:07, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• Very For. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
• For My progeny...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
• For.--MNM5150^{Talk Dirty To Me} _Failings 23:40, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

January

Mhaille (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 7 pronunciation conundrums

• N Yeah, he's won it before. But that's not to say he shouldn't win it again. Tireless efforts to contribute to other people's works with his imaging prowess that continue to this day.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  • This is POTM, not PotY--Æ 18:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Your point?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• For! Still cracks out images by request like there's no tomorrow. That's a quality I admire. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:45, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• If he can win again, I'm for--Æ 18:47, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
• Supportive, lifts and seperates, and thrusts his images forth with the greatest of ease. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:31, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• God dammit, this is a hard one. I'm gonna say Mhaille for now, only if ZB gets it next month. -RAHB 02:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• 15.5 featured images is slightly more than my minimum requirement on voting for.--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 03:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Strong For - Much better than that other guy. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Zombiebaron (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• N As above.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:32, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
  • This is POTM, not PotY--Æ 18:33, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Your point?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:42, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
      • deja vu! starring denzel washington! buy deja vu on dvd today!--SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 02:55, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
• Even if it was only for his Skin Flute he'd be worth the vote. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

2007

December

Olipro (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +5

• Has made several decent attempts at using Photoshop recently. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:01, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
• For. He may be a terrible human being who punches old ladies and twists the heads off of nuns, but he makes a fine 'chop. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:03, 23 December 2007 (UTC)
• Cock. Also - penis. ~ Mordillo where is my FUCKING? 09:23, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• Child molestation. Also - questionable sexuality. -RAHB 23:55, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• For Fine Chopper. - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 21:47, Dec 29

Gerrycheevers (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +5

• Nom and For - one of our more active choppers. Has a featured image as well as other original images (and more...)--Æ 02:41, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
• Sure Olipro has enough awards.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 02:43)

• comment. Also, it appears he has more pictures than the other guy this month, so...   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 25 / 09:47)

• For -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:54, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

• comment. it should be noted that the red baron image is not a chop, but is, in fact, an actual image that ranks #12 on a yahoo image search for the phrase "red baron." —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Gerrycheevers (talk • contribs)

• He can chop my potatoes any time. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 00:04, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
• Yeah, Gerry has put in some damn fine images. Olipro has as well, but Gerry has done more recently. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:10, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

November

Under user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: Nuneder user

• Nom and For Under user hasn't done anything that quite warrants a main page feature in itself (though I adore his latest work), but he has been a monster on the requested images page, and has made some great visual contributions, not to mention being quite helpful to those involved in the individual situations. -RAHB 02:38, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
• For the love of God, this guy still does Image Request? I guess he's the only one left... -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 02:47, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
• Fuckin' Limeys. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 02:48, Nov 5
• 4 • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:07, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
• For - And to think I was about to nom him... -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
• Anybody who does Image Request must be...well...I actually don't know. Anyways, for. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Electrified mocha chinchilla (talk • contribs) diff
• Actually, it means I'm not a very good 'chopper, and looking for things to practice on. You'll notice I avoided anything I didn't have a clue how to approach, like the current request to tidy up the Bender pic... I'll still self-for though, as it's all the rage these days! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:34, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
• For You are doing God's work while she sleeps in . Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:36, 25 November 2007 (UTC)
• For --Æ 16:45, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

October

Some user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 1

• Nom & For This guy has a hell lot of images--Sir Manforman 17:36, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Nonymous (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +0

• Nom + For. This guy is as active as any other contender, that is, not at all, but he's made my favorite image on the entire site, and more. I guess that counts for something. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:30, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Disregard this, I suck cocks. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Jocke Pirat (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: ☭6 UNSOC advertisements

• Nom + For. How could I have been so blind? Great chopper, active contributor, and best of all, he's ACTIVE! -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• For Damned Germans shot my brain!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 21:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
• STR☭NG F☭R, Workers of the World, UNSOC!!!
• Per TKF--Sir Manforman 00:08, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
• 4! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:01, Oct 8
• OR. ~ 20:10, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
• Active User Getting Votes On PotM?. Impossible. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

September

Some user (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +3

• Nom + For. This guy has photoshop, and he uses it. Well. He did that Chthulu image thing. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:25, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• For -RAHB 09:30, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
• For that Chthulu thing. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:04, Sep 28

Sikon (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 4

• Nom & For - created one of my favorites, Image:Errors.png--Sir Manforman 17:25, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• for --El legend 14:26, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
• F☭R,
• For -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:41, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

August

Sliferjam (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +8

• Nom + For. This guy has photoshop, and he uses it. Well. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:58, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
• For. Sorry baron, but I haven't seen the other guy on VFP. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 22:45, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
• For, I like that Lego Assasination image--Sir Manforman 20:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
• F☭R,
• fro -- I like legos. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:31, Aug 25, 2007
• For Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 14:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
• For Love that lego one for some reason. -RAHB 08:49, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Shut up and jam. -- Hindleyite Converse 11:05, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Spintherism (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• Nomination and For, as active as Sliferjam, which is to say not very, but definitely a wonderful photoshopper much deserving of awardingness. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:52, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

July

Gneomi (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +5

• Nom + For. Great images, both featured and not featured alike. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
• For Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:46, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
• For - How could he create such images? The best images I could creat would be created on MS Paint.--Sir Manforman 17:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• For --Saturn1 (contributions) (talk) Cult 18:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
• F☭R, 09:34, 30 July 2007

Spintherism (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +1

• Nom and For, Well, sadly, its probably a bit late in the month to be nomming, but, I'm going to nom Spintherism anyway, because he's just that good. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:09, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

June

MoneySign (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +$10

• Nom and For. After these images were recognized (and this one too even though I dislike it) I think it's due time for MoneySign to get recognized as well. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
• For - FU MONEYSIGN. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:35, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
• For, sadly his recent death means that he output levels have dropped. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• FOR He also created the NRV logo, UnNews logo, Forum logo, Undictionary logo and Poo Lit logo (and he sent me like ten different iterations of that last one to get it perfect). He should have been one of the very first recipients of PotM. —rc (t) 18:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• For! All of what RC said, and because June's contributions have been especially epic. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 01:13, 15 Jun 2007
• Fore!!! Wait, it costs how much to play golf here!?! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
• Da! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 18:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
• For Clever images! --Sir Manforman 20:15, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
• For -RAHB 02:26, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
• 4 - Good Stuff. Weird Boobies. User:۞/sig 19:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

May

Rei (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: 9ei

• Nom and For - 4 featured images, an MS Paint Ninjastar, and was invited to join the Potatochoppers' Guild. I'm impressed. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• For, I was just about to nom him. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• For, as per ZB. Plus, I nommed him last month, so this seems like an obligation -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 17:28, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• For I loved his potatochoppin' work in his featured UnNews article Overly political spider becoming annoying. --Kenvalyi 21:16, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
• For Oh my god that's a lot of images :P -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 20:12, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
• Been here a long long time and still going strong. Some great images.... -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 14:00, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

for Some really great work... I will add this poor soul to my list of potato choppers to harass for an image. Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 22:28, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

• F☭R, 02:53, 30 May 2007
• 4 Rei's good works, and the good art, too. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 12:12, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

April

Rei (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: +2

• N+F. Very competent potatochopper overdue for an award, and also for competition. --T.K.F. 21:30, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
• For Voting for the underdog! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:09, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Sannse (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups • Checkuser)

Score: thirteense(s?)

• For and Nomination. Sannse. What can I say about Sannse? Well, I could just link to a bunch of here potatochops. That would work. I mean, they are so good, that once everyone sees them, she will win, right? Image:Sophia-Magritte.jpg, Image:TsarwarsIV.jpg, Image:IowaSign.jpg, Image:Mona Sophia.jpg, Image:Falstropskittenhuffing.jpg, and Image:OscarPride.jpg are just some of them, but that should do the trick, eh? -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:49, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• For Had me at the Kitten Huffing Device. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 17:35, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• For All her potatochops are excellent. She may as well just get a PotatoChopper Life Achievement award. RabbiTechno 17:38, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• Fish, excellent potatochopper, with a great eye for detail. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 18:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• For /me gives sannse a wobbly penguin. —Braydie 19:25, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
• For great work --Kenvalyi 19:12, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
• For. One of the unsung heroes of Uncyc; working quietly in the background, only popping up every once in a while to silently sneak some genius in amongst our cruft. Not like the other PotMs, who are all attention whores. True story. --Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 19:30, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
• For - Because I was told to. --AAA! (AAAA) 04:57, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• For, so she will go on a date with me. --General Insineratehymn 23:06, 19 April 2007 (UTC)
• For, so she will go on an date with Insineratehymn.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 02:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
• 4, although I have no idea what she'd want with Insineratehymn. --Carlb 18:39, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
• For, just to see what happens. And the kitten huffing pic was cool. -- Hindleyite Converse 18:42, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
• For, so Insineratehymn will be punished for the original Contents by a date gone wrong. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 00:38, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
• For The Iowa one did it. ~ 13:43, 26 April 2007 (UTC)