From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Keep |
- Keep it ...Naked! Not at all horrible enough for deletion. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 05:07, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I worked on it for a while. It's been edited and pee'd a bunch of times. It's good. It could use some improvement as the last PeeReview suggested though.--Sir Manforman 12:58, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Not that bad -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
The real draw, however, was that George Martin edged out Phil Spector as producer of Let It Be...Naked! Hasn't been edited in a long long. -- Le Cejak • <-> 05:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Nuke it I just don't get it. Anyway Nom please put the {{afd}} tag on top of the page or this AfD voting will not count. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 11:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Okay, I see what yer saying. Le Cejak • <-> 05:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Did you guys notice that I removed my nomination? If someone else wants to renominate it, go ahead. Le Cejak • <-> 14:52, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Non-Huffable Kittens. They put their names to the test. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- More Kitten Huffing cruft--Sir Manforman 22:42, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:47, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 02:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 08:12, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, no need to have a stub article on something that can be already covered in Non-Huffing (which, by the way, needs some love) article. Erratic Communist 09:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep, as per MadMax. Remember that most of the people on this site are not regulars, and just come to look at inside jokes about things they know. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:28, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Seems like a strange nomination to me. The Oblong Lobster 11:44, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep MadMax swayed me--Sir Manforman 13:59, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Delete - to many external links, not funny, and is plain stupid. OK, I'm done VFD'ing articles for tonight--Sir Manforman 22:37, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Having grown up in Rhode Island, I admit there are a lot of inside jokes in the article that might be lost on other people although the page doesn't really seem that bad that it warrants deletion. As it stands, the article has some real potential I think and could use some revising although the absence of the Big Blue Bug and Buddy Cianci among other topics, is disappointing. Also, as the guilty party responsible for adding most of the "references", I can remove them if that makes a difference. MadMax 23:25, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Jesus makes everything funny? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- LOL PENIS is way funnier --General Insineratehymn 23:00, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- lol, Satan -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 05:13, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 08:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Lol, egg. Er, delete. (Bonus points if you get the reference here.) – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 18:08 Sep 29, 2007
- Delete, I hate this Jesus shite.
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Jesus makes everything funny? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:20, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Seriously, what is the deal with all the Jesii? Are Original Jesus, Black Jesus, Atheist Jesus, Zombie Jesus, Robot Jesus, Baby Jesus, King Jesus, Jesus of Nazareth, Dark Jesus, Super Jesus, Sony Jesus, MC Jesus, and Jebus not enough? -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 05:19, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 08:04, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, Please!
- Jesus Christ! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 18:20 Sep 29, 2007
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Battle marks the end of the Egypt pre-dynastic period and period of big Sun activity, lasting for 37 years. Le Cejak • <-> 13:35, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- josh was here -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:38, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Joan of Arc, Three Musketeers, Juozas Statkevičius, Red Cloud, Myndė, Albinas, Akira Kurosawa, and Crazy Frog all say Against -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 08:03, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete,...
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
Week Keap I don't know, I thought it was a good concept. If it gets huffed I'm going to move it to userspace and try to expand it. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 06:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep The pontential is just too massive here. JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 02:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Vindicate, merge and cleanup. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep by order of H.R.H.H.R.Clinton. Sir Roger 04:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I am still working on this article, I still think that it can be a great article. HerrSimp 01:25, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Good faith WIP. But HerrSimp dude - reduce the size of some of those images please! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep,
- Have Mayfair work on it. --General Insineratehymn 00:32, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Clarification: We also have The USSA, so two articles would be redundant. If fixing up or rewriting one article, the other would work better, as it's much neater. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Both U.S.S.A. and The USSA (or at least anything salvagable) could be merged to United Socialist States of America. MadMax 06:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Inquiry: Was that WiP added before or after I put this on VFD? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- It was initially added to the article by the author, although the tag was removed prior to nominating it for VFD. MadMax 23:43, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Actually it was someone else, however it had been over seven days when it was removed. MadMax 08:38, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- KEEP I kind of think this is funny. I like it. The Oblong Lobster 23:07, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP this is some comedy gold--Bender89 00:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Vindicate Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- What, like you've never kicked children before. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:38, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep,
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- ICU. The text is very unfunny alright, but the images alone justify the page. Develop the page massively. <3 .talk.work.?pedia.
- Keep and V -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:57, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Medium Delete. This is just one big political joke about the pope :\ pfff, it could be way more relevant (there's not even a proper page about Pope Benedict!). Also, it's had that "steamroller" template there for a very long time. Good things are: last edited 2 weeks ago (by an ISP), links to lots of places. However, I think this page deserves a fresh start with an editor that doesn't care about the pope... cuz all it is is an unfunny image whore. Oh, catholics molest children? I've never heard that one before! -- Le Cejak • <-> 13:50, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment, as you may have gathered from its placement in the comments section. MrMetalFLower, ICU's can only be placed on articles less than a week old. (I made the same mistake when I first came here.) – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:06 Sep 26, 2007
- Nevermind I'm rewriting the stupid thing. Even with this one paragraph it's better than a whole g*d damned page about how the pope looks like palpatine! WTF IS WITH MY SIGNATURE?? WHY DOES THE DATE DO THAT?-- Le Cejak • <-> 01:03, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. Nomination withdrawn. MadMax 23:13, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keepify. The article itself isn't funny until you read the HowTo it's based upon, but that's no reason to delete it. Instead, why not move it to HowTo:Write a Bad Uncyclopedia Article/Example On Wheels? --User:Banjo2e/SIGGY 21:01, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep As per the argument above. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 21:38, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep As per the argument above. Elassint 22:32, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I've been swayed. Do the above. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:54, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Move. Per the above. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:12, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, what everyone else said. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as nominator - It should be obvious why this page is of poor quality (for example, the first sentence reads "Write all of your notes on this page.") If this is deleted, consider turning Note into a disambig. Pentium5dot1 23:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:40, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 02:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Vanquish - Meh. We already have a few pages like this. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:18, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Junk. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:57, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Shit -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:58, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Major points lost for not employing footnotes. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:11, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep - I disagree with Manforman. I believe that it was inspired by his cat, not about his cat, therefore, it isn't vanity. The only bad thing about it is the drama it caused. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 00:11, September 28, 2007
- Keep - Still Funny to me. I would hate to see this one go to the dumpster. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 07:52, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - While the article indeed is turning into a pile of random stuff, deleting it will harm a lot of kitten huffing related articles, not to mention that it actually has a lot of potential. I suggest a partial rewrite. Erratic Communist 15:14, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep - Why is it VFD? This is real funny and has tons of potential. UserSlavemaster2 28 September 2007
|
Delete |
- Delete - the author quotes "I created the Non-Huffable Kitten based on my cat", so it's vanity, and it sucks--Sir Manforman 21:15, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Its influence has been very negative over the weeks to the point of causing drama. You know what I mean. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Pretty much all of the humour is just randomness and namedropping. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Vanity or not, it's basically random, name-droppy stuff. No real humour to see. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:04, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Based on my cat... I meant the color scheme... Why the hell don't you delete the rest of my articles? The page is a PR 4 and is very popular... -- 00:10, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Dude, from your userpage and talk page it looks like you've taken this one personally. Why not take the advice from the Pee Review and re-write it? Ah well. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:54, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, well I did take this personally because I had added the page to a lot of conversations and linked it to a few things, it is big and this was the only thing that made me want to stay at Uncyclopedia. And the fact that someone who had an argument with me is voting "no" without even adding a reason, which is why the arguments before started on the same article. -- 21:50, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete--Sir Manforman 21:13, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Blagh! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:02, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:38, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Vanquish - Messy, listy, crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:51, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huffed Grouse -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 02:38, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Dire. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:46, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:08, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. OK, it's an unfunny, kinda random article about a corruption of the name of one of the dullest places in the UK (Weston Super-Mare). What's not to hate? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:53, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- I hate it already -- Le Cejak • <-> 19:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- KIIIILLLLLL!!!! --THE 19:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:38, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:15, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Uh, no. No no no. -- Le Cejak • <-> 14:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No. No. No. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- No no no no NO no no. --THE 19:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fuck no --General Insineratehymn 21:39, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:36, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- What is no, Alex? -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 02:40, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:32, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
I think this article needs to be tweaked to include more humor revolving around the show The L Word rather than Will Smith and various UPN sitcoms. --User:BaylorBoy/sig 22:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Messy, messy. I think I'd rather watch ABC, which says a lot. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 07:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. More rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:52, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Vanquish - Messy crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 09:11, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:33, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Revise. It's about the same as CBS's so I'd keep it, but vote for some polishing. User:BaylorBoy/sig 22:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:39, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Has some potential, but mostly listcruft. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 07:12, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Nah, listy badness. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:51, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Vanquish - Messy crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 09:10, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete--Sir Manforman 21:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Revise. I think it could be funny if somebody bothered to clean it up. User:BaylorBoy/sig 22:18, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:41, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Vanquish - Quite a few of our hundreds of GTA pages are bad. This is one of them. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Del Taco - This one doesn't seem to be any good compard to the other GTA pages. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 06:41, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:19, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Grand Crap Delete-to. No, wait, that sucked. Plain Delete. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Og my nigga -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:44, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep - I gonna have to say keep on this one. I felt that this page was funny and alot of work was placed into it to create some Redeeming Value. This isn't stupid like the GTA New Orleans one is. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 06:43, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- KeepUm, you "delete" guys aren't Canadian, are you? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Vanquish - Quite a few of our hundreds of GTA pages are bad. This is one of them. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing funny here. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 21:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:17, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Grand Crap Delete-to. No, wait, that sucked. Plain Delete. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:55, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- If you haven't seen a show called "Trailer Park Boys", there is no way that this page will make any sense. Not this page. VFD never makes any sense. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:01, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Vanquish - Quite a few of our hundreds of GTA pages are bad. This is one of them. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:49, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Del Taco - Same reason why GTA New Orlans should be dumped. This one is stupid compared to GTA Sunnyville Trailer Park. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 06:45, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Oh yes, let's go on a GTA related delete rampage. Most of the pages wouldn't be missed. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:46, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:16, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 00:17, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Grand Crap Delete-to. No, wait, that sucked. Plain Delete. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:24, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:02, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. I know I would. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:23, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- De1337 - Man I would rather see this page in the format of AAAAAAA! --Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 06:47, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Thi$ $hit $uck$ -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 06:53, 27 $eptember 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:44, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- DeLEte --THE 19:48, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- $uck$--Sir Manforman 17:30, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:03, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comment$ |
- Comment Can't you ju$t delete thi$ your$elf Zombiebaron, no que$ion$ a$ked? -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 06:53, 27 $eptember 2007 (UTC)
- No, because it was previously kept on VFD. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 09:14, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: Con$ider (1) a redirect to Money, (2) a redirect to User:MoneySign, or (3) a disambiguation page containing at least the two previous items. Pentium5dot1 23:31, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - can't redirect to MoneySign because it would than violate our vanity policies--Sir Manforman 17:29, 28 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- It's a bunch of towncruft combined into one article--Sir Manforman 21:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Why do we need a 'new' York anyway? The Oblong Lobster 23:42, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 23:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Newk it townpun! Le Cejak • <-> 00:26, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- "All in all, New York is a shit hole." No, this article is a shit hole. Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 06:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Delete. So poor, we deleted it twice. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:38, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:47, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:53, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Ugh --General Insineratehymn 22:29, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Shit. Random, namedroppy, lengthy, ugly, poorly written, unfunny shit. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:37, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- delete. Very towncentric. I'm from MA and don't get good potions of it. And it sucks. It's not like it's that hard to make MA funny, is it? P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 21:40, Sep 26
- Delete. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:41, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete--Sir Manforman 21:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:51, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 07:00, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. More dull towncruft. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:35, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- WTF, indeed -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 04:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Vanquish - Weird concept, poorly executed. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Disapperate - Unfunnsterious 7Zarc7 05:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:33, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random tripe. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:17, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom/Delete - It's just not ringing the humor bell for me. A major rewrite would be necessary. Pentium5dot1 02:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Vanquish - Unfunny, vacuous. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:40, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Whitewash Sir Roger 05:08, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:31, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:15, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Strongly keep. This article is much comedic! So DON'T DELETE!!! Pika8888 09:28, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Strongly Keep. This article is a satire of Philippines as a whole, and is hilarious to most Filipinos: just google the reactions - and also take a look at the discussion page. You are correct that it is unfunny if viewed by a non-Filipino - but you have to consider that a satire of any nation (including the article on the United States) will be unfunny in the eyes of a foreigner, just as a joke about anything for that matter will be unfunny if you are clueless about the object of the joke. Its like getting rid of all the British humor in Uncylopedia because Americans don't find it funny, etc. We have to take into consideration the readers of the article who knows the country. Lastly, it is not racist because the whole article was done by a Filipino. --Gilgal1(Talk to me bitch!!!) 14:32, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete, libel to crash a browser if its not careful. Also, terribly unfunny. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:00, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Baleet. This is actually even more racist than Kramer. Very unfunny. --RandomDie 00:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 01:27, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Vanquish - Long and messy, mostly unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:50, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Even though the main contributor is Philippino, and the page has undergone thousands of edits. It is hopeless. Sir Roger 05:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Awasin Needs a major rewrite after deletion. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 09:19, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Get rid. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:03, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|