From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 |
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
| Keep |
- k33p - I don't know why, but I just can't bring myself to want to delete this. It's antisemitic, it doesn't make sense, ad God probably hates me for liking. Despite all that, I still think it's funny. --El Destructeso 19:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per El Destruecteso. --
 » His Majesty King George VI (the boxes)     22:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- I refer you all to OEJ's wise words on the talk page. Brigadier Sir Mordillo
 GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 17:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Blatantly antisemitic. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 17:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Huffinate. --
 » >UF|TLK|▋» 19:05, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Racist without a cause, unlike Holocaust Tycoon.--Shas 20:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This serves no purpose; the phrase isn't even used in slang. Dame
 GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:17, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Racist without a cause, like Black Santa by one of the authoring IP's -- di Mario 03:03, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Blantanly makes fun of something I belive in. Therefore, its slander against me. That bastard. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:06, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- I don't even have to explain, do I? - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 12:04, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Chuck Norris sucks. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:43, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- No, you don't need to explain. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 17:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- NO ONE CAN KILL CHUCK NORRIS--Shas 19:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Kill it Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:15, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- No comment --AAA! (AAAA) 02:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- delete Though it has some funny portions, it's a bit too high-octane for my taste -- di Mario 02:54, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff Do we ever use this? --General Insineratehymn 19:54, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- No way ho say Your mom so phat, she creates her own gravity. -- di Mario 22:14, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - What's a "{{{1}}}"? --El Destructeso 23:23, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- FTW? Yet again, whats a {{{1}}} and how does it bear any relation to Your Mom?--Shas 07:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Huffit I just cant see it being put to good use...--
 15:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- One hundred and fifty percent not funny. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:44, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:42, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
- {{Yourmomjoke|Deleted}} --AAA! (AAAA) 02:22, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- A {{{1}}} alows for a "string" variable to be entered in the editing box for the intended article
and not the template itself. So if this bloody awful thing was to be used, you could type in
{{Template:Yourmomjoke|penisLOL}}
to replace {{{1}}} with "penisLOL".-- 15:01, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- But how can a person with that amount of editing skills ever think its funny?--Shas 20:06, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Gone. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:28, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Put a sock in it, comrade —Hinoa talk.kun 09:49, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. -- Mitch
 10:27, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep! I love gross stuff.--Super90 10:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Nothing wrong with a little hate. Come to think of it, nothing wrong with a lot of hate either. HATE HAET HAT -- di Mario 19:41, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I hate you too... Come to think of it, she should her userpage to do that, not in public space. HATE HAET HAT GSPbeetle complains Vandalisms 08:21, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- I know katie hate this, but with her name in the template won't make it useful for us to use. Please respect communism to remove name or move to her userpage GSPbeetle complains Vandalisms 09:47, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - Uh no. --El Destructeso 22:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Should probably go in her namespace now that we all know that works (which I think we didn't back when this template showed up.---
 Rev. Isra (talk) 11:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Will make it happen in a day or so if nobody else does.
 Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 01/21 20:04
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- drown him --Super90 11:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Stuff him in Davy Jone's Locker --AAA! (AAAA) 12:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- No way -- herr doktor needsAbeam
 [scream!] 19:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Not going to work. --General Insineratehymn 19:46, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Gravey Jones Although I admit I laughed at the David Cassidy reference... -- di Mario 22:11, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - Do I really need to say anything? --El Destructeso 23:25, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Not even remotly funny. Just an excuse to use a shock picture. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 01:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Looks like a shitty outgrowth of one of my favorites, Holocaust Tycoon. It's like all the offensiveness without any of the humor. And the caption is plagiarized from HT, even. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 01:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Blech. The pun has potential, but would be very very hard to pull off. This proves it.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:03, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Bleuughhh! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- kill it some one should stick this joke in a oven and... damn it! My joke is tasteless too...--Super90 11:00, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Blatant antisemitism has no place here. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 19:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Final Disposition please. Holocaust jokes of any kind are just stupid and not funny. -- di Mario 22:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete+Comment How can Holocaust jokes of anykind not be funny if Holocaust Tycoon won VFH?--Shas 06:58, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
- Crush. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 07:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- The picture seems to be taken from the article, but if you do a little digging within the revisions, the caption in Orange Jews was scribbled in months after the Holocaust Tycoon revision - Orange Jews recieving it on October 6, 2006, and Holocaust Tycoon recieving it on April 28th or so of 2006. --~
 Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 03:04, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff Short, unfunny. --General Insineratehymn 22:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Learn how to
drive format! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:09, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Metal Underpants They are called chastity belts and went out in the 70's. Do your research. -- di Mario 22:06, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Krush the rebels --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 07:03, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete The guy made two edits to this article after creating it and never came back to it. --General Insineratehymn 22:54, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- It's outta here. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 15:49, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff Need I explain why for this article? --General Insineratehymn 22:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, and the place is shit. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:12, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- post-natal abortion please not funny and stupid. Way too short. No imgs. Hurts the brane. -- di Mario 21:44, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- It appears to be an add-on to or spin-off of another article: Pigeon_Philosophy which in itself is not bad imho. -- di Mario 21:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
Voting Closed. Due to Prettiestpretty's Rewrite there will be no further voting on this article.
| Keep |
- Keep I know its easier to erase than correct, but this article is a natural for Uncyclopedia and I think that rewrite tag should have been used in this instance. Give me a few days and I'll get it a shot. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I second that. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:33, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- k33p - Eh, whatever. --El Destructeso 22:42, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Prettiestpretty has rewritten it, and as such, I vote for it to be kept. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:25, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per PP's rewrite. —Braydie at 21:19, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- maintain The intro sold me. Quite philosophical! -- di Mario 21:40, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - nice rewrite has saved its immortal soul. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me) 00:14, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
Old and not funny. Someone will come along and write something better, I'm sure (and if they don't, we can VFD that). --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 09:07, 19 January 2007 (UTC)- Delete. -- Mitch 09:41, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- I like it. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Huffed, voting closed for lunch. --  13:20, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff - Unfunny. -- Rei 20:23, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Good god. -- » >UF|TLK|▋» 22:02, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:39, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- We destroy to rebuild. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - Wait, I don't understand the last part. Does it have something to do with porn? --El Destructeso 22:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- remove as it adds no comic content to the website ass a hole. -- di Mario 21:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- Absorb Nasaly MY EYES! MY EYES!.--Shas 07:02, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Somehow I doubt this guy's ever coming back to finish this crap. Huff it. --Super90 07:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- The guy who created the article made only 1 edit to it and never came back. Also, the article itself is terrible. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 00:16, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete for making fun of the apocalypse -- di Mario 21:36, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Kneep and expnand. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- While I will point out that it has been made uglier and less coherant (slowly), those edits are not really "vandalisim" and should be considered. Also, it was bad before (circa Tompkins revert, for example) --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:12, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:36, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Into the round archive Writer is clearly confusing otter with Wendy. -- di Mario 21:21, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff Random, short, and pointless. --General Insineratehymn 23:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- The Finest Manure, without "The Finest". --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:13, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:35, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- dilithium in its present state. Not funny and just plain ... well .. not funny. -- di Mario 21:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff. Long, but listy and free of content. -- 13:31, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Crappy (pun intended) --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:10, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Shit. --General Insineratehymn 01:26, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Dilate Not funny and stupid. -- di Mario 19:47, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Huffed, voting closed for lunch -- 13:25, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
Keep I don't actually see how this is all that terrible. Could stand for clean-up/addition, but actually has a somewhat solid core. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and expand --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I did her too, in 1902 (yeth I am that old). In my nightmares I can still hear her moaning. -- di Mario 19:38, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
No longer topical or funny (except maybe the "Miers in 1902"). --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 22:12, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - It stinks, because it had a lot of potential. --El Destructeso 22:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
The propose for deletion is not properly done... GSPbeetle complains Vandalisms 09:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Okay, I'm being nice today. I've added the VFD template to the article. George the 6, please remember to add {{VFD}} to the top of the page to be voted upon in the future. Successive infractions might hurt more. —Hinoa talk.kun 19:42, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. Maybe it's just me, but I don't think it's funny.... Maybe old vanity? --Gnome
   …MUN F@H 17:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Schoolcruft. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:29, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It's schoolcruft. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- delete from a to b It centers too much on American culture. No i18n. -- di Mario 19:32, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- I think this is an old in-joke. The song is the best part. Just delete the templates and it'll be fine. --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 21:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and cleanup. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:04, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- 4EEP I lafft a bit.--Witt,
 of  UNion Entertain me* 03:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It is about a famous web site and forum, and many in the community here contributed to the article. If we are making fun of Facebook, MySpace, Livejournal, etc we should make fun of IWETHEY as well. Their members tried to blank and vandalize pages here, which I think is a good reason to have an article on them. If anything, someone do a rewrite. Their members kept placing templates on the article to discredit it, and many kept adding templates in efforts to try to make it funnier. It was up for a vote for deletion before, but it was voted into being kept. Ever since, a random IP will try to blank and vandalize the page and place more templates on it. It is not Vanity, BTW, IWETHEY is famous for their war against SCO, being Linux pundits, and invading the Infoworld Forums and stealing Infoworld for their IW part of their name. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 04:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Classic.
  t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 06:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and Rewrite It's a classic, but it needs special attention. --General Insineratehymn 23:38, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- keep -- di Mario 18:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- According to their mailing list, their web server is down due to a RAID problem. Is the reason this was put up for deletion because their web link does not work any more? This article has been around since the early Uncyclopedia days and survived forest fire after forest fire. Besides the article has been vandalized a lot, and instead of being restored, it gets put up for VFD? Is that the new VFD policy, an article gets vandalized and instead of fixing it, we vote to delete it now? Besides they are a part of our folklore on how Uncyclopedia is the worst. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 06:05, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- I am attempting to fix up the article. Remove the extra templates that vandals put on it and remove some broken links and other damage done to the article. Like I said just because it was vandalized is no good reason to move it to VFD if it can be fixed and restored to the funnier version. Even if it is Sophomoric, so is UnBooks:See Dick and we kept that article because it had potential. I even worked making suggestions to See Dick to make it funnier. The least you could do is make suggestions to IWETHEY to make this article funnier and rewrite parts of it. I am one of the many who contributed to this article and I don't have the time to keep cleaning it up because the vandals keep sabotaging it faster than I can fix it. It is a sad day when articles get deleted because they were sabotaged and vandalized and nobody wanted to help out and fix it and would rather delete it than fix it. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 03:24, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep and fix - Well, it's a pun. Victoria's Secret? I want to give this one benefit of the doubt. --
 Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:00, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- not the worst thing ever, just needs expanding - jack mort | cunt | talk
 - 17:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP give me a few days to breath some life into this dud. Unlike a child molester, I think we can rehabilitate Old Vicki. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 01:22, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Oh, my love, my darling, I've hungered for your touch a long, lonely time. Time goes by so slowly and time can do so much; are you still mine? I need your love, I need your love, God speed your love to me. Lonely rivers flow to the sea, to the sea, to the open arms of the sea; lonely rivers sigh, 'Wait for me, wait for me; I'll be coming home, wait for me!' Are you still mine? I need your love, I need your love, God speed your love to me... The Humbled Master 03:13, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- keep. I once did her (yes I am that old). I remember her fondly. -- di Mario 18:31, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- I found this article from the link from the featured Victorian Era and it is awful, especially if someone clicks from a good article to a bad one. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 07:39, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - "Victoria's Secret?" I guess that would explain the pr0n, but not the dwarfs or the hiding or any of the other stuff. --El Destructeso 00:49, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
*Delete Don't be thrown off by the seemingly competent formatting; the article is bad. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:27, 17 January 2007 (UTC) It's been rewritten, so I nullify my vote. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 23:09, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Huff. Sorry I'm a bit behind on voting to kill stuff. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:12, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- k33p - I have to vote for keep, just because of the "sexy phone." I think that's hilarious. --El Destructeso 00:59, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Ugly little sucker aint it? --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:07, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Not funny; huff. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 05:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Really long, but a content vacuum. Boink it --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:06, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- At least there are plenty of lovely headings.-fish 03:47, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Band articles almost always suck. This is no exception. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Changed my mind, I like it now, though it still probably could do with expansion Nullius in Verba 15:24, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and expand --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:20, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- We need a mathematician. Until then, keep --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- keep. i don't really understand it but it feels like that's my fault rather than the article's - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP What a punchline, lol, cardinal numbers XD--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- It's more of an "Ah..." page than a "Moo-haha!" page. If you don't get it, buy a pipe and sew suede patches on your jacket.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Reminds me of my time at Unseen University -- di Mario 18:25, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Delete. -- Mitch 03:50, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - You people seriously want to keep this? There's no actual article! I mean, come on! --El Destructeso 01:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- "There's no actual article!" Uh, that's the idea. Cantor's set removes the open interval of a line until there's no line left but still an infinite number of points, the Cantobury tales have no text but still the regular amount of plotNullius in Verba 04:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- k33p - Sir Captain Zombiebaron, why do you hate God? All Jesus, Black Jesus, and Satan want to do is provide their input on articles. Well, I hope your happy. You've made Black Jesus mad. And when Black Jesus gets made, he'll bust a holy cap in yo' ass. Watch out. --El Destructeso 02:21, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. This is fucking hilarious. How dare you nuke quality material! You're just asking for the Bucket of Piss award. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I don't want to get Black Jesus mad at me. You have never seen him when he gets angry. Deleting his template will get him very angry at you. This is racism, because he is Black and not White. You all want to keep the White Jesus template, but delete the Black Jesus template? Black Jesus is just representing on Uncyclopedia is all. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 21:35, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, I don't use it, I don't like it; indeed, I'm no fan of any of the no thought templates. But it has its place. Feel free to cut it when its posted on pages for which it isn't appropriate, but don't punish it for being misused.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I actually like this one, but I agree that it's being overused. Maybe cut back on it, but don't get rid of it altogether? -- 08:06, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Deleting this template would force us to copy and paste it onto religion-related articles, and then the machines will have won. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I like it, but I may be a little biased. It's my little baby. ^>^ I agree that it may have been a bit overused. But that is merely an indication of its popularity and should not be considered a factor against it. Remove it from superfluous pages, but don’t kill it entirely. Big Brother 1984 03:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep primarily because Jesus probably was black (or at least closer to black than he was to white), but it's pretty meh as is. --Ж Kalir with all the grace of a tin can 03:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm banking on Arabic, because of the location, or lightish brown or whatever.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:59, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but it is being overused... Maybe do something about that... --Dexter111344 04:06, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep yo yo yo, let keep this template GSPbeetle complains Vandalisms 09:14, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP. because black mannequins have to have something to believe in. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep C'mon, it's hilarious! The Humbled Master 00:39, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
- keep if only for the picture. The text is racist and bad, however...--Super90 10:48, 20 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- This is, in my opinion, on of the least funny templates ever made. And yet, I see it plastered on horrible page after horrible page. Usually at the top, this template just adds length at articles to try and keep their subpar humor around longer, and probably is an attempt to add humor. Anyway, its ugly and not funny, and thems are the reasons. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I h8 it. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:19, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry Black Jesus. But I don't find your template, well, funny. Plus, it doesn't make sense in the articles you're in, unlike your funnier on sight white homeboy below.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 02:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, based on the sole reason that this was on ED's front page. Also blatant racism makes me D: --Roger The Bum Full sig! CLICK HERE!!!!!!!! 02:23, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Templates are the lowest form of 'humor'. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- And every other template like it, too. —The Right Honourable Major Sir Hinoa KUN UmP UotM Bur MDA NS CM (talk) 04:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete
 Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Black Jesus is one of the most annoying and overused templates on Uncyc. Meh.----OEJ 19:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete —Braydie at 19:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Burn See how he likes it then.
 -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 19:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- /me hates crap templates. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 20:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 01:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- worthless - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:05, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- But how exactly do we plan to get rid of the red template links on millions of articles? Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:27, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Hard work :D —Braydie at 19:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Since this template is about to die, I'll start removing it from articles. --AAA! (AAAA) 20:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've put a topic on the Village Dump (Removal of irrelevant Jesus, Satan, and Black Jesus templates) which proposes listing irrelevant uses of this template. Obviously if we dislike overuse of this we must identify where it is used inappropriately and remove it. Please contribute. Thank you, and remember -- Black Jesus approves of this effort.----OEJ 16:58, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Which is another reason for me to dislike it. Anyway, here's a brainstorm: if we absolutely have to keep these templates, perhaps we could have Jesus and Black Jesus alternate through use of <choose> tags? Just a thought. —The Right Honourable Major Sir Hinoa KUN UmP UotM Bur MDA NS CM (talk) 04:15, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep - It's used for religion-related articles. I like it, and I'd rather delete Black Jesus instead (no, I'm not a racist). --AAA! (AAAA) 02:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Holy Keep Zombiebaron does have a point, but we need these 2 templates for certain religious articles where they work. Plus, this is the first image of Jesus where he isn't solemn or nailed to something.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 02:18, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- k33p - Hey, Sir Captain ZombieBaron: Cut these Jesus some slack. Don't you know how busy His schedule is? You should be honored to know that He can take time out of his busy workday to personally review an article. And that goes double for Satan. --El Destructeso 02:17, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep i†, but keep it more on topic --Roger The Bum Full sig! CLICK HERE!!!!!!!! 02:51, 11 January 2007
- Keep it part of Uncyclopedia's charm is that it isn't as proper as that other pedia thing on the Internet. Keeping this isn't going to bring down a rain of faire and brimstone. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 03:03, 11 January 2007 (UTC)(UTC)
- Keep --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 22:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, I don't use it, I don't like it; indeed, I'm no fan of any of the no thought templates. But it has its place. Feel free to cut it when its posted on pages for which it isn't appropriate, but don't punish it for being misused.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, specify use --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:28, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- keeep - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep-Just an overused template, like {{USERNAME}}, if used properly it can be funny.--Scott 03:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - This shouldn't have been even put in this category to begin with, I think its a pretty funny template --Uncle J 23:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- As with its counterpart (The Satan Approved Template) this template does nothing for an article. It is just a way that people make their articles look longer so they can evade NRV/ICU, and later VFD. They add clutter and nothing more, making articles no funnier. An example of this is Grammar Fascists, an article I just found through the list of articles with this template, and am about to VFD. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete We don't need this shit. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- And every other template like it, too. —The Right Honourable Major Sir Hinoa KUN UmP UotM Bur MDA NS CM (talk) 04:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Just copy the code into the very few pages this may work.---Asteroid B612
 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 18:26, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 05:21, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not real big on the Jesus/Black Jesus/Satan/etc... templates. They make an article seem puffed-up, right from the start.-fish 03:49, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Dear El Destructoso, I don't think that you acctually understand that point I am making. JESUS IS NOT REVIEWING ARTICLES. That is silly. Jesus is in Brazil sculpting beautiful ladies that then come to life. He doesn't even have the internet. The people who do this are borde line vandals in my books, and in noway holy. It just makes articles more ugly, and requires nothing to be placed. Heck, VFD could be Jesus Approved. Oh, and that goes for all these templates. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've put a topic on the Village Dump (Removal of irrelevant Jesus, Satan, and Black Jesus templates) which proposes listing irrelevant uses of this template. Obviously if we dislike overuse of this we must identify where it is used inappropriately and remove it. Please contribute. Thank you, and remember -- Jesus approves of this effort.----OEJ 16:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- ...but Jesus loves everybody. Even the little stubs and NRV'ed articles...--epynephrin 16:33, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- k33p - Unlike some people, I deeply respect Satan's decisions. If the Dark Prince decides to make a template about how He is all knowing, then let him do it. --El Destructeso 02:06, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep ZB has a point, but we need these templates for certain religious articles where they work. And you gotta admit that the image is absolutely fitting for the Betrayer of God.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 02:14, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:16, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Funny. It is used for Satan-related articles. --AAA! (AAAA) 02:18, 11
- Keep it just like in the Jesus approved template: part of Uncyclopedia's charm is that it isn't as proper as that other "pedia" thing on the Internet. Keeping this isn't going to bring down a rain of lightning bolts and earthquakes and floods. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 03:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)(UTC)January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 22:07, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, I don't use it, I don't like it; indeed, I'm no fan of any of the no thought templates. But it has its place. Feel free to cut it when its posted on pages for which it isn't appropriate, but don't punish it for being misused.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:52, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- nothing wrong with the template aa long as it's used wisely - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. --Sir Todd GUN WotM MI UotM NotM MDA VFH AotM Bur. AlBur. CM NS PC (talk) 04:00, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It might be overused but I think the template is actually pretty funny --Uncle J 23:24, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- In all honesty this should have been deleted long ago. People just randomly sprinkle this, and the templates in its family, across articles with no rytheme or reason. It is not funny. It doesn't make articles funny. It is ugly. And it makes articles ugly/uglier. So yah, all it does it subtract from articles as a whole. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:04, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Serves no useful purpose; is not funny. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 02:29, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- And every other template like it, too. —The Right Honourable Major Sir Hinoa KUN UmP UotM Bur MDA NS CM (talk) 04:52, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete.-fish 03:51, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Listen, both the Jesus and Satan approved templates are absolutely suitable for some religious articles, however, zombiebaron is right that people who put these 2 templates in articles where they don't fit (Why would Jesus approve an article about chainsaws over something like Satanism?). Black Jesus and other spinoffs I don't like, these 3 however, I like and I believe they fit.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 02:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- There are other spinoffs? Oh god! Send me a link! Oh, and the few articles that it does fit on, it can be subst'd onto if the template gets deleted. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:01, 11 January
2007 (UTC)
- Well, black Jesus and Robert Mugabe are the only others that come too mind, I dislike BJC and his izzle of a tamplate, but Mugabe seems to be funny enough in his own right to approve governmental issues, especially in Africa and Zimbabwe.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Upon seaching for Robert Mugabe all I found was one image of him which is on two pages. Please link me to the template you are talking about. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:30, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Its in the Africa article--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 23:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- I've put a topic on the Village Dump (Removal of irrelevant Jesus, Satan, and Black Jesus templates) which proposes listing irrelevant uses of this template. Obviously if we dislike overuse of this we must identify where it is used inappropriately and remove it. Please contribute. Thank you, and remember -- Satan approves of this effort.----OEJ 17:00, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff Stupid, short, and unfunny article of an obscure town that holds no importance. --General Insineratehymn 00:48, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Eh? --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:09, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Total shit and quite possibly vanity. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:17, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Deleted; voting closed. -- 16:33, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Improper NRV (and that's discounting the fact that NRVs are depreciated). However, improper NRVs rarely keep stuff from sucking. So, it are vote time. I say we kill it. —Hinoa talk.kun 20:20, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Same to you, stupid article! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:51, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Shot your Fuck up. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 21:10, 16 Jan 2007
- The Southern Tenant Farmers Union endorses deletion of this article. goshzillacorrespondence 01:22, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Ugly sucker ain't 'e? --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:52, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Does this sort of shit even need discussion? Put it down. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:18, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
I would like to suggest merging the article with STFU. I would, but I'd end up screwing both articles up... --Dexter111344 02:49, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
Executed; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)13:16, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Vaporize. Looks pretty much like an old wikipedia copy&paste, and copy&paste is evil. --Gnome …MUN F@H 20:03, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Quick kill. Wikipedia copypaste. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:31, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Kill C+P obviously --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 23:26, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff. Vanity or not, it's short and unfunny. And possibly Tintin related, which makes it worse. -- 18:54, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- #2, this one too. --Gnome …MUN F@H 21:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Needs to go --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 23:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:25, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
- Get outta here. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:08, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- IT AIN'T FUNNAH! Kill it. --Dexter111344 01:55, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Band articles almost always suck. This is no exception. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 03:21, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
How many times... FLYINGFELINE, REMEMBER TO PUT THE VFD TEMPLATE ON THE DAMN ARTICLE! Executed anyway, voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)13:20, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff. Two paragraphs of crap and a list. -- 18:27, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Seconded. --Gnome …MUN F@H 21:25, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The only joke was the way "criticized" was splelled: critizied, and critized, and critzed in the same section. Wow. ----OEJ 21:30, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
- DIE --The Rt. Hon. BarryC MUN (Symposium!) Sigh. Double Sigh. 23:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Not as bad as it could be. Keep. goshzillacorrespondence 03:10, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- What the hell? Sounds like a real guy to me, all I know is that someone has to put shame to these Disney originals... Mr. Briggs Inc. 21:48, 12 January 2007 (UTC) Eh?
|
| Delete |
- Fan-cruft edited almost exclusively by a single IP; doesn't appear to even be meant to be funny. Huff without prejudice. Ral315 09:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: If not for the semi-competent wiki formatting, I'd call this an outright spamming. --CaptainSpam MUN PUTPBAA 09:43, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Only one contributor = instahuff --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:09, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete —Braydie at 18:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Toss it. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:10, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- get rid of it Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 21:11, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Huffed; voting closed. -- 17:53, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Huff. Seems to be vanity, plus there's an edit war going on about the slant of the article. Wikipedia doesn't have a page on it, either. -- 16:11, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Smells like teen slandanity.----OEJ 16:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- You have my vote. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, this is shit. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:17, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Such vanityshite, huff it, if i could delete I would have done it already --Proximale 00:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Erase --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:11, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Executed. Though oddly enough, it was blanked when I got there. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)00:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Huff. Ditto below. -- 13:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
This article should not have been added to VFD because it was blatant vanity. I have removed this from VFD and nuked it. Further nominations of new articles are considered abuses of VFD and will result in a 1-day ban and a further 1-week block from editing VFD. Please read the deletion policies for more information. Voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)14:45, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Huff. -- 00:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 18:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- k33p - Yeah, it's pretty random. But who really cares? --El Destructeso 02:13, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- Mostly irrelevant to the article, but see Joel Veitch's exceptionally filthy flash-song about anal seepage here. Um, I should add that this has VERY DIRTY LANGUAGE. Click appropriately, and remember to think of the chinchillas. ----OEJ 01:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Delete. No relevance to the movie, nor the Indian "baghban", nor anything else. Pic is purposeless.----OEJ 00:30, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not even a single line break, either. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 18:40, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- kill looks factual, copypaste, with an unrelated picture - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:18, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeecch. --UNKNOWNFILE 23:28, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Really old crap. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:40, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Kill. God, I can't believe how long that's survived. --UNKNOWNFILE 08:34, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:45, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- huff - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:38, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - What?? --El Destructeso 23:19, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Candy Skull build it into a skeleton, then bathe it in caramel skin! Mr. Briggs Inc. 01:03, 6 January 2007 (UTC) Eh?
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep and expand. --UNKNOWNFILE 03:44, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- as above^ - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:04, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Huff Has been in Category:Rewrite for a very long time, and was never improved during that time. It's just a collection of lists, and I hate articles that consists of nothing but lists. --General Insineratehymn 00:32, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - I agree with Insineratehymn. This just isn't very funny. I can see why the author would think that it is, but it's really not. It's repetitive and annoying. --El Destructeso 00:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- KILL ALL LISTS!!! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Return to sender --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 06:13, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Ugh. Disgusting. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 08:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Provisional keep - Done editing. Please review again. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:44, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- A bit better now. Keep and expand. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:40, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- I laughed! Keep it. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 04:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- About as funny as when you go to kiss grandmother goodbye and she slips you the tongue. OK, so its not as funny as that, but in the right hands it can be fondled into something that could be acceptible to society one day. Keep it. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 22:17, 13 January 2007 (UTC)(UTC)
- k33p - Not tonight, Dad, I have a headache. --El Destructeso 01:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- keep - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:11, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, as I have just done some fondling of my own. (On the article.) c • > • cunwapquc? 19:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
*FUCK NO. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:19, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Incest is hilarious, but this article just makes it seem not so funny. Delete. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:01, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
*Hang on - Editing.... --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:32, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Kept; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)00:35, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- No way you can't delete that? I thought it was funny...--Mountaineer 20:55, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- You should at least fix it or something, it's good...--Gyroballer 21:22, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- If you delete this one you will need to delete the one for all the schools and universities on here.--
 13:23, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Right from the time I first saw this (as it was created) I thought it should be deleted due to its vanity element. Heck, I even VNRV'd it. But someone removed the VNRV, and now I have to VVFD it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 15:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete all high school or any other school vanity articles. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Looks like a Wikipedia page. So lock and load -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 17:40, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Looks factual to me... so nuke. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- Schoolcruft. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
- Names names, so Delete --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:21, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
- Schoolcruft --General Insineratehymn 00:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- kill kill - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:06, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
In regards to RLX's comment: Read this and try again later. —The Right Honourable Major Sir Hinoa KUN UmP UotM Bur MDA NS CM (talk) 00:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- keep and tag rewrite, has potential - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:20, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Intoxicate has got to have an article behind it in some form... --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 01:24, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
- I liked the ending of it, where the author is apparently so drunk that he passes out typing and the end of the article becomes random letters. I say keep and expand. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:48, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep The author knew his typos, and notice the string of g's? Potentially, if someone intoxicated passed out on his keyboard, face down on it, its most likely his or her nose would hit the letter "g".--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 02:31, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Kept; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)00:37, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- k33p - I tried my best to make this better. I'll admit it's still not that good. --El Destructeso 23:15, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- could be worse - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:14, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- It really needs help, and I doubt a {{rewrite}} will do the job. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:02, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Put out of its misery. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:37, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Reads like something from my earlier days... *shudder* --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 01:00, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Reads like something from ENeGMA's earlier days...which were bad, apparently.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:59, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Delete. OK, I get the joke -- Helmut Kohl. Meh.----OEJ 18:44, 7 January 2007 (UTC)- Delete - "Helmur Kohl?" What? --El Destructeso 19:59, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Huff. You know, a lot of us don't
care about know what happens in German politics. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:39, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- to delete an article because you're ignorant of the subject matter is twatty, but this is currently only a short paragraph, and half of that's padding - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:11, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
- Burn There's a bigger picture than the artice? What sort of page like that deserves to live? -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 17:42, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- OK, as there are several votes to keep I have take the liberty of expanding the article, gently and I hope in the proper spirit of kluge Ausscheidung. I hope Rangely and other authors will check it for teh funny and further modify as appropriate. Glückliches Bier!----OEJ 02:16, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Kept; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)00:39, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
*Challenging to write an article about a (supposed) adjective. Put it in Undictionary, or failing that, delete. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:35, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. An underdeveloped embryo with no arms or legs or laughs.----OEJ 15:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- NO - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:33, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - I can see where he's going with this, but i don't like it and it doesn't make sense. --El Destructeso 23:23, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Contrary to popular belief, this is not funny, nor will it ever be. --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 00:58, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Tagged with ICU --AAA! (AAAA) 05:32, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
- Expansion tag added -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 17:46, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
- You and I both know this will never be expanded. *patiently waits for someone to prove me wrong.* --Sir ENeGMA (talk) GUN WotM PLS 22:09, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Kept; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)00:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Keep and rewrite, we have something good going here! --UNKNOWNFILE 03:40, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Expand Seems to be an OK start, let's see what comes out of it. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 07:15, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Expand. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 10:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
- keep - jack mort | cunt | talk - 14:32, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- k33p - Hell, I couldn't write anything better. --El Destructeso 23:27, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
- Expand --General Insineratehymn 00:41, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Kept; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)00:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Aye I said keep. No, not delete, keep. —Braydie at 18:29, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
*I've voted to keep worse. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 21:46, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Peek. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:30, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- k33p - You guys realize no one actually wants this to be deleted, right? Composure1 is the author, and that's why he put it on VFD. --El Destructeso 23:20, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Erm, yeah. —Braydie at 23:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- This is awful, I should really have put this on QVFD but I'm being generous. --Composure1 18:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- Token vote to delete, now that it doesn't matter. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 23:40, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
- I'm brutal, and want this page deleted, or sent to Guantanamo to receive some correcting treatments.Guutog 06:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
Kept, but I'll SUBST: out Category:VFD. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)11:38, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
|
