Uncyclopedia:FFS/archive2
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:FFS. |
Famine (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: -3 people with the balls to fight the POWER
- Nom, and for. He is more bureaucratical then a Vogon! FU FAMINE--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E throw a snowball 07:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against. He's the thin blue line between us and chaos. Chaos! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:12, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against. He has an excellent fan club (Famine's Fan Club). He's a modest guy, so he deleted the article. --Polystyrene Man 19:02, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against He's the Maginot line between us and the Canadians. Canadians! ~ 19:09, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Comment OMG.It's like that book 1981, that fascist bastard Famine has brainwashed you all. Brainwashed!!!--SIR T H A T G U Y H U F F E D M E throw a snowball 21:25, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Rumor has it, that anyone who votes for will get banned. I love you all too much for that to happen. 06/13 21:41
- Strong Medium, I hear he's the Maginot line between me and Mordillo. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:02, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Fonchezzz (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: +1 pounds of nutmeg
- Nom, and for This kid seriously pisses me off.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 00:35, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- For the opposition of A pound of nutmeg is enough to kill someone's grandmother. --Polystyrene Man 18:57, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
MediaWiki default (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: +3 (???)
- Nom, and for. I caught this guy on my own Wiki, and am nominating him for a real ban there. I looked on this Wiki for one, and I found one and found he changed things without permission from anyone. I figure I nom him for a joke ban here. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 03:18, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- For - He could be a vandalbot for all we know. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:35, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- Absolutely! Do you know what he did with the page title? CANNOT BE TRUSTED. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Zerotrousers (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: +3 "Uncyclopedia is the worst" spinnoffs
- Nom and For. He's Nin on steroids. Plus he vandalized my user subpage. Plus, he loves drama. Plus, he uses BENSON's name in the way. BENSON wouldn't like it. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 20:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delayed for I somehow sense that Zerotrousers will need to be banned for 1 day and 2 seconds, on the 1st of June. I wonder why that could be... -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:57, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Extreme For Vandalizing my userspace. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 03:37, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- DEFINITE FOR! -- 16:02, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- Conditional For - if he is leading UGotM on the last day of June, then a 24 hour, 1 second ban wouldn't go out of place. –—Hv (talk) 28/05 20:56
Tom mayfair (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: -3 communist pinkos
- Nom and For He made UNKNOWNFILE look at shock porn. Tom admitted to making him do it. -- 23:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- against - shockporn = part of the internets -- 23:47, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against This user has too many cool templates on his userpage for me to vote for. General Tso's Chicken 03:20, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- No way. He's the model comrade! Actually, I am pretty anti-communist, but I have intelligence reports confirming he's a CIA infiltrate with a mission to mock communism. -- herr doktor needsAbrain [scream!] 21:12, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Although he is a bit sex obsessed, he makes a decent contribution to the site.-- 01:28, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against - It'll make Keitei mad. --AAA! (AAAA) 01:33, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against Vote for me instead plz. Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, even though I didn't realize it was shock porn. I had bad resources. 02:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against - If Tom's gone, Olipro will have a shortage of people to rape, and my get out of rape free card won't be valid any more. Imperator█Dark_Apostrophe█The Memory Hole 00:03, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- Fuck commies. They want to take our guns away from us. --Emmzee 21:20, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
UNKNOWNFILE (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: 2
- Nom and For
sudo rm -rf /dev/UNKNOWNFILE
--Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 20:24, 22 April 2007 (UTC) - For lolgrues -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
For being a dick (concurs with Starnestommy) --Spaz 23:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Double for for being a retard and a troll on IRC --Spaz 23:45, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Define "awesome". --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 23:27, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- lolcarps -- 23:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- "Carps" are neither cool nor funny nor awesome. Sharks, however, are --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 23:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- lolcarps v2.0 -- 23:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- PWNAGE v2.0. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 23:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- don't dick with my comments -- 23:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Don't dick with my userspace and make false claims that I am someone else. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 23:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- don't dick with my comments -- 23:37, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- PWNAGE v2.0. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 23:35, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- lolcarps v2.0 -- 23:34, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- "Carps" are neither cool nor funny nor awesome. Sharks, however, are --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 23:31, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- lolcarps -- 23:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- A☭AINST, I made him look at shock porn once. I'm sorry. 23:38, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- AgainstBan me!!! Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against, I smell a rat, Starnes appears to be trying to get payback for this. 71.34.103.198 23:13, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- FOR! He blanked my old page and replaced it with this:
Excuse me, did we correctly find your inner sock puppet by saying you are Big Boss 0? |
--Defender 911 13:25, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment:WAAHHH! (crying) >:( NO ONE BELIVES ME! THE SOCK PUPPET SHIT ISN'T TRUE! <:( --Defender 911 01:00, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- For, unknonfile u suxxx Disaster 06:21, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against, primarily cause HanSolo voted for. Imperator█Dark_Apostrophe█The Memory Hole 02:07, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Against <3 -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 03:29, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- For. He voted AGAINST me! Waaaaaah! --Emmzee 20:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
- For...I DON'T LIKE ALL CAPS.--Shandon 06:58, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Yellow 130 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: -1
- Nom and For Ban Me I suck I probbaly did the coding wrong =(. Yellow 130 19:55, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- For - He needs to go... Capercorn 21:05, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- IN A FIRE!!! -- 05:48, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against - I wanted that above vote to be +2, not +0. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 17:46, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- GO DIE IN A FIRE -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
Sliferjam (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: 1 cases of identity theft
- N and F He stole my name on IRC! Same reason as last time too! -Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
- For! I vote for! so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 20:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. Dude! I hate this guy. 20:57, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
*Against. - I like spiting popular opinion. Since people seem to favour banning him, I'm going against it. :) Dark Apostrophe (Click here to bitch. :)) 14:05, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- For - Changed my mind :) Dark Apostrophe (Click here to bitch. :)) 23:36, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
- A☭AINST, I like jam. 23:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- 'Against Vote for me not him me. Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- For He is a Neopet and has no originality whatsoever. --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 18:32, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
Inaneframe (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: 1 idiots
- Nom and for. The person is obscene (check out his user page if you don't believe me, unproductive (goes to VFH and votes against things "because"), and altogether seems to be a troll of magnamious proportions. --Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:27, 22 April 2007 (UTC)
- For He also uploaded a hello.jpg. -- 01:28, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
- AgainstDomo Oregato Mr.Roboto. Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
<insert name here>
Score: 9 worn-out jokes
- Nom and For <insert name here> is a complete, irredeemable piece of shit. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 00:03, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- For. <insert name here>'s been an bleak and limey bastard upon this site. -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
This joke is complete, irredeemable piece of shit. -- 07:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against Because the USERNAME template still isn't working for my browser! --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment oh, thank god, i thought i was up for a ban!!
- Comment haha, me too.
- Comment Me 3 it scared the shit out of me --☭Mr.Huffy☭ 02:32, *Against10 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against - Fuck it, I thought that code was supposed to be broken according to my css. -- 23:26, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Quit this crappy joke it might have been funny a loooooong time ago, but... --Bleachie talc 02:06, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against - This joke is so old. --AAA! (AAAA) 01:03, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Oh, I didn't even see that, I'm an idiot. Zombieninja666
- For. <insert name here> sucks so much... --Emmzee 22:49, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- For - He writes the most horrible s***, and it makes me cry. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 15:54, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against - Hugely overdone joke. 10/04 22:57
- For- <insert name here> is the worst thing that ever happened to this site. --THE 19:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- For I hate me, and you all ought to hate yourselves too. Zombieninja666
- For Boot me, big time. Quadzilla99 22:59, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- For Hinoa does suck, I know and by now I believe so does everyone else. Mr. Briggs Inc. 01:11, 25 April 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- Against Please stop beating this dead horse. You've reduced it to dust from beating it so much. -- 23:29, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against <insert name here> is a good user! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 01:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- For <insert name here> tryed to tickle me with his armpit hairs! General Tso's Chicken 02:16, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- FOR! I never liked <insert name here>. --Defender 911 22:27, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against <insert name here> is a complete gay and enjoys engaging in gay-like activities...like flower arranging and hairdressing... --User:Crazycraig18
- For I never liked <insert name here> either --Asahatter (annoy) 12:20, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against because I fell for it... --Goulash 19:31, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
Flour! Whenever I hear the name "<insert name here>", I implode --Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN 13:44, 15 May 2007 (UTC)- For I shudder at the sound of the "<insert name here>". He vandalised my userpage and huffed my kittens. —Pongo (talk) (gs) 17:30, 16 May 2007 (UTC)
- Doesn't actually do what it's meant to anymore. It says <insert name here> which somewhat kills the effect. That being said, <insert name here> is a douche.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:59, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
- For because I thought I was up for a ban. The USERNAME thing has become a worn-out joke. It was funny a long time ago, but it's not funny now. PF4Eva, the King of Imagination talk Contributions 20:53, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Conditional For, if everyone on the site gets banned for a day because of this. -- 20:56, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Why the hell <insert name here> should be banned? Reinn 04:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- For, I am extremely opposed to <insert name here>'s actions, including his edits on the "sheep" and "whack" page. <insert name here> is one of the worst users to grace the pages of Uncyclopedia! - Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate 22:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- For, <insert name here> is a total dumbass and should die in a fire. --Spaz 23:25, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
- Against Oh, this is a joke. I was wondering why I had touched off such vitriol when I haven't done anything. And how I'd been nominated for banning months before I opened my account. Anyway, this is pretty dumb. I Hate Wikipedia 04:20, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
DiZ (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: +5
- HE IS A GHEY OROUBOROSIST! HERETIC! WE SHOULD COVER HIM IN TAR AND CRUCIFY HIM,
GODBENSON DAMMIT!-- 09:55, 21 March 2007 (UTC) - FOR HE ATTEMPTED TO FORCE HIS RELIGION UPON US! A BAN IS PERFECTLY JUSTIFIED IN THIS SITUATION! -- 09:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- FOR FUCK HIM K? Zombieninja666
- It's cuba right? —Braydie 22:44, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- ? WAS THAT LAST POST BY BRAYDIE A FOR OR AN AGAINST????-- 07:22, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Will decide if and when DiZ votes for/against me. —Braydie 15:40, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against, because like Mr. Briggs Inc. and best friend ModusOperandi, Ourobouoros and DiZ are two things that other people hate that one person loves. Except for the fact that people like ModusOperandi. You know who I also like? Darkfred and Sir Oscar Wilde. Mr. Briggs Inc. 21:23, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- FOR Kill! Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
against bensonism isn't a religion, it's a cult -- 00:55, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- Can I kill him? Please? *makes puppy face* —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 15:44, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- A☭AINST, 00:20, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against Zombieninja666
- Against --Bozotheclown 11:51, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Emmzee 11:10, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. Ouroburos must die. That and he hates Contents. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against You want to ban him for a normal article!?! That is crazy! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 01:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Not the article, the whoring. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:47, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Againstgreat success. Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. 29/04 15:28
- For.--Scott 02:28, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
Spang (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: +FU 5
- Nom & For - FU SPANG --AAA! (AAAA) 04:27, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- For FU and everyone else in the "heh" group. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 07:36, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- for he's an ass. Zombieninja666
- FOR FU SPANG -- 17:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against. SPANG U, F. --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:46, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- A☭AINST, FU SPANG. 22:19, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- FOR? FU SPANG. -- 09:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against WHY? Fou-Lu 23:23, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against FU RCMURPHY --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 21:19, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- Abstain Wouldn't make a difference either way. —Braydie 13:31, 28 March 2007 (UTC)
- FOR FU SPANGLE G. GLITTERSPRINKLES! —rc (t) 03:14, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- AGAINST You're just jealous that he wouldn't let you post in arc2.0 rc. We're onto you! --Ceridwyn 00:36, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
- FOR. FU SPANG --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:18, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- FOR. Flipped a goatse coin. The goatse side was up, therefore, I'm voting for. Dark Apostrophe (Click here to bitch. :)) 14:08, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
- Save him save them all. Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- For "Idiut". -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 02:32, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- FOR He banned my brother and made him cry. FU, Spang.-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 22:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
BENSON (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: +10
- NOM AND FOR - BECAUSE HE IS NOT THE REAL BENSON! THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE! --AAA! (AAAA) 02:49, 16 MARCH 2007 (UTC)
- against -- 05:45, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- FOR He's not even the real Benson, yet he's admin. If you guys won't make me admin, at least permaban fake Benson. Benson 15:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- FOR BENSON IS BETTER THEN YOU!!!!!!!!!!--Scott 02:59, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Four BENSON < dirt --Bleachie talc 03:06, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- FOR! DEATH TO FAKE BENSONS! -- 15:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- FOR We eat fake BENSONs for breakfast! --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
- Against Nobody cares. Well, I certainly don't. --Anotherpongo 18:15, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- You cared enough to vote... --Stevegasm 06:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
ForOh wait, it's not the real Benson. Against :P -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)- For It's a sock... why not ban it? --Stevegasm 06:36, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- For THE INFIDEL Fou-Lu 23:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- against Fake Bensons are like Benson apostles. Mr. Briggs Inc. 21:15, 23 March 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- comment but benson doesn't approve Fou-Lu 02:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- FOR - BWHAHAHAHA! Capercorn 16:07, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. Kill all Bensons! 10/04 17:13
- For Benson is better than BENSON! General Tso's Chicken 02:13, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- BAN HIM I agree THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE!
- WTF? I thought he was the real BENSON! <:( --Defender 911 21:09, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- FOR. Fake Bensons don't deserve accounts here. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
- FOR Die BENSON die! Your userpage is too long! (Among other reasons) Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service)
- For On the other hand, copying another user could be part of his First Amendment rights. Luckily this isn't America. This is Uncyclopedia! --
High Gen. Grue (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: +3-ish
- Self Nom and For Because I can. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
- For because he will eat me if I do not agree with him. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:59, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- For People who nom themselves are just asking for it. —Braydie 03:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- For Dark Apostrophe (Click here to bitch. :)) 22:06, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- For removing humanity's greatest threat. 11:34, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- Me? Greatest threat? Isn't that ED? --Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer-
- Against Grues are #1! --Anotherpongo 18:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against - ALL HAIL THE GREAT GRUE ARMY!!! --Capercorn 23:42, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against - I am in his army. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 23:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
For - Infuriatingly annoying in IRC, oh yeah and this: User_talk:Ceridwyn#I_said_i.27d_kill_you...Against We made up :) 12:16, 17 April 2007- For Kill the grues before they kill you! General Tso's Chicken 15:44, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against the Grue Army, vandals can do nothing. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! 01:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- For, because I can. –—Hv (talk) 8/05 19:29
- Ug-inst as per the mashed 'taters in my socks so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 21:09, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- For Never liked him. I Hate Wikipedia 04:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
Molotovnight (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: 0
- Nom and For per trolling, being a dick, insulting Benson, threatening us with terrorist attacks, and other such nonsense and buffoonery. -- 01:22, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- AAAAAAgainst I like to blow him up, and overall flame him.---Han Solo (High Gen. Grue) Comlink Grueslayer
- Against, he changed his ways. --
- For, he changed his ways, this is a sign of weakness. Mr. Briggs Inc. 20:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- Can I kill him now? I've got a template ready to be used! Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
- For Rather arrogant I have to say based on the userpage. General Tso's Chicken 02:22, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Lstarnes (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: +1
- Nom and For - I have never made a good article and I have been blocked and kicked from IRC several times. --Lstarmes 23:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- against Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Billybutterworth (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: +1
- Nominate and For - Total vandal, uploading poor quality pictures. Shadowlost 20:38, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Reverted all vandalism, including George Bush, John Brown, American Civil War, and my userpage 3 times 01:10, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- forrrrrrrrr - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:20, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- aganst Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Walter Humala (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: +3
- Nom. Someone put the FFS template onto his userpage and never added him here, so i'll do it for them :). also For as a kneejerk reaction to the giant swastika - jack mort | cunt | talk - 18:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- For He stole all of TomMayfair's stlye, and turned it into hate hate hat, on his userpage. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, As per Zombiebaron. 01:07, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- FOR - Please...get...that...screamer...off...his...page... --AAA! (AAAA) 02:54, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against. He's a good contributer, he's reverted vandalism already (something not many people do enough to be seen in recent contribs) and the images he's uploaded are not of low quality.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:06, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- For using Tom's son's pic without consent and for that swastika. ~ 11:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- For. Send him to Sobibor. -- herr doktor needsAbrain [scream!] 21:27, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- For. Maybe a ban here will lead to a ban of his dumbass at Wikipedia.
- Strong Against. Hey! what's all that deal with banning me, we easily can discuss terms on my talk page. Emperor Walter Humala God save him!(God exists?) | wanna Talk? 23:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- For Not a particularly funny userpage and plenty or crap. General Tso's Chicken 21:14, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Bilky asko (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: -1
- Nom. likewise this user had the FFS template added to his userpage without it being listed here. also he is evidently insane. For - jack mort | cunt | talk - 18:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- C☭MMENT, So do I ^_^ 01:14, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- So, liek, for ya know Just cuz, and he sounds insane. Zombieninja666
- Against Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Nintendorulez (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: -17.5
- nom and against. because the people need their say - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:17, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
- Conditional Against If he changes the "z" in his name to an "s" and the "Nintendo" to an "Xbox". -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- A☭AINST, Join The Fight. Get your FREE Userbox here. 01:04, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Argarnzb Anotherpongo 18:38, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
against -- 03:07, 6 March 2007 (UTC)- Against. Nintendorulez is but a simple follower of BENSON, and is being persecuted for his beliefs. --Emmzee 13:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against for obvious reasons. BTW, Tom, thanks for the userbox. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 05:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against for i am agianst banning in Uncyclopedia, except in serious cases.
- Against. I am officially joining the crowd. -- 09:14, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against what people? i dont see any votes to ban him! Fou-Lu 02:44, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against dictatorialism. goshzillacorrespondence 13:28, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against! -- 01:48, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against My Euroipod was made of cheap parts form an old super Nintendo and put toghter by two year olds and I had to figure out it was scam by the cabal the hard way...I should of listened to Nintendorulez ... --Scott 03:11, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against All he did was speak his mind and he was executed for it. Revive him! -- 15:20, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against Free Nin! Zombieninja666
- Against Famine said that "this will not happen in all of 2007" So y is the ban infinite? RELEASE NIN!-- 06:17, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Fuck This Ban Because Nintendo does rule. Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines
- For -- 23:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against Hell, I'll jump on the bandwagon. General Tso's Chicken 03:20, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- For failing to conform. —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 21:03, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
- For - I like rabbits. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:41, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against I don't ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 20:40, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Free DJ Drama! --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:19, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against - LET THE NINTENDO REVOLUTION BEGIN!! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 15:00, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- AgainstI agree. Yellow 130 04:41, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- HE MUST STAY! --Defender 911 21:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. The vote to unban this user is invalid. And it should be invalid. I'm may not be a sysop. - User:Jtaylor1/sig 14:25, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Braydie (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: -2
- Nom and For The ass banned me after he archived FFS! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:11, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- For There are so many reasons why this guy should get banned. He's had it coming to him for sometime. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against. walks me through drunk editing without being patronising, and isn't american - jack mort | cunt | talk - 18:02, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
For Imagine - banning me! The cheeky asshole. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC)- Comment Can't vote twice. Not even the might squiggle. 17:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
- Against
How can we block someone like this?I said a funny... 17:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC) - A☭AGINST, I don't think Uncyclopedia could withstand even one day without this wanker. 01:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against Braydie tends to do a pretty good job of getting rid of a lot of cruft that would otherwise go unnoticed for several minutes.unsigned comment added by Shadowlost
- Against For banning my little brother Lstarnes. --Starnestommy 01:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
- For, duration equal to the length it takes to manufacture a piece of paper by hand. --Ж WHEEEEE! 00:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- FU PAPER —Braydie 03:24, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
*For; This user deleted my Lynbrook High School Article. Unsigned, doesn't count.-- 06:21, 22 March 2007 (UTC)
- Probably the most useful, hard working Uncyclopedian of the last six months. Also a talented and funny writer. We couldn't survive without him. Strong For. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:04, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
- For I don't like him one bit, and he though I did something this one time for some reason I forgot but I didn't do I just wasn't there. Zombieninja666
- Against "I'll kill you all" *Brandishes Machete* --Olipro Anchor KUN (Harass) 21:21, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's Cuba, Right?-- 06:07, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against Can I nominate Squiggle for nominating him? Quadzilla99 17:14, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against Don't ban him, We need him! Quadzilla99's sockpuppet 17:15, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against Don't you dare ban him! Sockpuppets of Quadzilla99 17:16, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against Hey you sockpuppets! You can't all vote which one is your real vote? Quadzilla99=puppetmaster 17:17, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- The first one. Quadzilla99 17:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- :) —Braydie 20:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- Do it four more times and someone might notice you.81.155.93.210 17:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- God you're retarded, I only added one to the vote tally. Take the serious attitude to Wiki. Quadzilla99 22:55, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Do it four more times and someone might notice you.81.155.93.210 17:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- :) —Braydie 20:39, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- The first one. Quadzilla99 17:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
- FORE! User:High Gen. Grue'simplesig
- Against - He executioner in glorius VFD. Capercorn 22:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
- For - He destroyed an article on Paul Thurrott, accusing it of Vanity!? How is this a vanity article when other well-known people in the same professional field as him (such as Mainhardt Graf von Nayhauss) and the same industry as him (Bill Gates, Steve Jobs) have extensive Uncyclopedia articles? Wikipedia have an article on him, for crying out loud! The deletion was unjustified, and telling me to "go away" without any previous affiliation with me is unfair to say the least. Lordofcrisps 14:53, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
- For Joick.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 02:29, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against I have a hard time taking this page seriously, comon 02:01, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against Naahhh. -- 18:54, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Contestant (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: -4
- Nom and For -- Being a moron on IRC and needs to learn not to anger sea turtles --Starnestommy 22:36, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against Made one of the best articles I had ever read. Does not deserve a ban. -- 03:12, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against Don't be silly. —Braydie 03:15, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
For. This guy's been nothing but trouble since the beginning. Starting religions, trisecting bodies. Ungodly! -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 23:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Yeah, fuck that. -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 21:08, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
- against -- 01:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- For bloody heretic! there is but one true religion! - jack mort | cunt | talk - 01:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - You mean...? --AAA! (AAAA) 02:51, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
- "For" He huffed my article without giving much of an explanation at all.
- Against HowTo:Start a Religion made me millions. I finally have enemies worth destroying. Captain Carcass 23:38, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
For
- This vote does not count due to the lack of a signature. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 17:51, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
- A☭AINST, 23:52, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: +9
- Nom and For -- I suck. --Starnestommy 02:51, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Strong For For the sole reason that you nominated yourself. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:52, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- For. For the sole reason that you're not funny. OH SNAP IT'S ON LIKE DONKEY KONG AM I RIGHT CAN I GET A HIGH FIVE HIGH FIVE YEAH -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 03:04, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oh God, for How many for's can I use?--D3koy 00:00, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- For. goshzillacorrespondence 00:06, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- Against. goshzillacorrespondence 00:07, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
- For. --Fou-Lu 01:13, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
- For. Yeah, you're becoming a little obsessive about other people's reaction to your stuff. Maybe a day off at the movies could do good for your mental health. -- herr doktor needsAbrain [scream!] 10:33, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- For god's sake ban him! --officer designate Lugiatm MUN NS CM ZM WH 20:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- 30 ED and 10 Uncyc users agree: This guy sucks. -- 07:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Destroy him: What a fucking waste of oxygen and organs. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 07:26, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- for I change my vote Zombieninja666
- For Jumping on the bandwagon of hate. -- 17:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- F☭R, 22:16, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
Ineligible. Already permabanned. Somewhat... easy, then, isn't it? -- Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 00:35, 29 March 2007 (UTC)
- Eligible I'm back! --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 21:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- For. He's breathing my air! --Emmzee 11:07, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
- For I have no real reaons to vote here, but I'll do it anyways. General Tso's Chicken 03:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against. Going against the crowd on this one. 21/04 15:38
- FOR!!!!!!!! HE LICKS BALLS! >:-( --Defender 911 22:29, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
- Against! He could be slightly annoying at times, but he's no Col. Swordsman. -- 21:22, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- STRONG AGAINST This is one of the coolest people ever to step foot in Uncyclopedia. --
- Against He's awesome, and
I don't want him to delink his serverI like him. --Spaz 23:21, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Redickyoulus (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
- Nom and Strong For He's probably already banned, but this is just to reinforce his already-probably-infinite-ban. If you didn't already know, he put shock images on the Main Page, and now I'm scarred for life. Braydie, hold me! *Sob* -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 03:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- Banned forever. --Starnestommy 03:00, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
- It's ok Squiggle, I'll make the bad man go away. —Braydie 01:16, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
Thekillerfroggy (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
Score: ±1
- Nom, but not for just because. ^_^ —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 03:04, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- For! Because every person nominated on FFS is obligated to vote for themselves (unless you're Walter Humala). Also, cocks. --T.K.F. 21:20, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
- Also, because I suck at IRC. -- 21:15, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
TheTris (Talk • Contribs (del) • Editcount • Block (rem-lst-all) • Logs • Groups )
- Nom + For.This fucker had the nerve to win Uncyclopedian of the Year award before this site even existed. Sure, (s)he didn't work hard and committed almost 0 hours every day fixing up the nonexistant site, but in the end (s)he still ended up just pissing the shit out of everyone. -- 21:26, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
- Against (S)he started the Oscar Wilde saga we love so much. --