Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/archive214

The Second World War II

Score: 0
Keep (5)	Keep. I'm not seeing lots wrong with this one. Aleister 13:53 24 8 Weak Keep Likeable compared to the others. --Wilytank 15:14, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Because I lolt at MacMania's delete vote. Being serious for a moment, it's a workable concept and just needs a bit of editing to remove the really bad bits. However, two of these links should be redirected to the other. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:10, 25 August 2010 Keep. I remember this article from the Nuremberg VFD Trials. I spared it once, and it shall not face double jeopardy. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:20, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Keep I was sold the moment Bob Marley went bursting from the trees with his trusty AK-47 and cried out "Yeeeeah mon." You hate Baby Jesus if you weren't. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 19:34, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. You know the drill. Saberwolf116 11:23, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Doctor Who's Series 4 finale made more sense than this.  Incoherent and unfunny. Sir MacMania GUN—[16:20 24 Aug 2010] Delete. Per MacMania's delete vote. This man speaks the truth! Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 01:19 Wednesday, August 25, 2010 Delete. 'Spielburg'? Needs an edit anyway...oh why bother, it's randumbo through and through. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:00, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Delete. NRV.--HM (T) 19:19, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	That's a keeper --ChiefjusticePSX 05:50, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Battlefield 2142

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Good war pics have no categories on them, and the page isn't that bad. Aleister 14:35 25 8
Delete (5)	HUFF WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE!  I remember when we murdered Battlefield 2, also, this sucks. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:53, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I remember no such thing, but it still sucks. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:46, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Another would-be game writer on here. Why DO these articles just cough out crap time and time again? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:13, August 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Ick.--HM (T) 19:17, August 26, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 00:13, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. Those aren't "good war pics" those are video game screenshots. Oh noes!!! Where will we ever find video game screenshots on the fucking internet!?!?!? They are so rare we need to keep track of them. No, wait, after tits and cats video game screenshots are the most abundant JPEGs on the internet. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:43, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

299792458

Score: 6
Keep (0)
Delete (6)	Vape. It's random and unfunny. The big list at the bottom doesn't help much either. --Andorin Kato 23:13, August 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete. How would anyone ever find this? Honestly... —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 06:27, 27 August 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 11:18, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Stupid. Stupid. Stupid! --Wilytank 16:23, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:44, August 27, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Utter, utter shit --Elassint 00:00, August 28, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Minionismism

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Didn't laugh. Saberwolf116 01:22, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not too good. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:46, August 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not even half an idea. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:16, August 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank 15:13, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

War Of Canudos

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. It's just the Wikipedia article, lightly vandalized. Lame. pillow talk 18:43, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:08, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Doesn't rise above the level of unfunny abuse.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:06, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Wikipedia. Saberwolf116 10:40, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Great Sushi Conspiracy

Score: -2
Keep (7)	Keep per Modus and Spang back in 2007. This is sort of one of those "bat fuck insane" articles that does random and pointless right. pillow talk 21:31, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Surprise keep. Because despite looking like a list, it's not actually a list. And it's funny. Fact. --UU - natter 09:08, Aug 24 Lulz MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 09:33, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Keeeeeepppppp A wizard did it. Aleister 13:56 24 8 Probably hilarious -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:35, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:10, 25 August 2010 ☃ Snowman. Keep.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  25 Aug 2010 ~ 05:12 (UTC)
Delete (5)	EXTERMINATE!  Aww, what the fuck is this shit? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 7:38 PM 8/22/10 Fact: This article is poorly written listcruft. Saberwolf116 23:41, August 22, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Nothing but a list, about either sushi or conspiracy, plus a black helicopter at the end. Please delete the talk page too. It was on VFD in Apr-07, survived despite 3-5 vote against, only Modusoperandi had something good to say about it. Spıke Ѧ 23:45 22-Aug-10 Obliterate. Just terrible. —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 02:05, 23 August 2010 (UTC) Delete. Crap knackers. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:42, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Korp. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:49, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Citroën

Score: -2
Keep (4)	Keep. I smiled at a couple moments. I think it's better than a blank page. pillow talk 21:34, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Keep. per above --Elassint 19:56, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Not all that bad. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:10, 25 August 2010 Kleep. Aleister 14:55 25 8
Delete (2)	Disintegrate. Listy and unfunny. Saberwolf116 16:49, August 22, 2010 (UTC) Delete. "And nobody likes to stretch, especially not the French." When I read that, I hoped we were near to making a point. Mistaken. Written by a young Frenchman (referring to the car as "he") who has not completed his study of grammar, and doesn't bathe this article's typoes. Spıke Ѧ 11:33 23-Aug-10
Comments	Klept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 01:48, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

☼

Score: -3
Keep (10)	Keep!!!  Best article on ☼ ever!!!  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  23 Aug 2010 ~ 06:13 (UTC) Keep!  But solely because of the cute little 'SUN!' at the end. --Some Idiot 08:39, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 08:53, August 23, 2010 (UTC) That's not a sun..... --Roman Dog Bird 09:17, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Laughed until I cried. From shame. Aleister 15:11 23 8 Weak keep. To feature ☃ and delete ☼ seems inconsistent. Besides, it's not like anyone's ever going to search for ☼, and if they do, well, they probably get what they deserve. pillow talk 21:23, August 23, 2010 (UTC) As per precedents Snowman and Swastika (the ones titled with the symbols, obviously). Sir MacMania GUN—[16:39 24 Aug 2010] Bandwagon keep because I'm like that. --Mn-z 22:46, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Keep. For great justice. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:10, 25 August 2010 Keep. FEATURE!!! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:21, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (7)	What's up with all these dumb one-line articles lately anyway? This really isn't funny at all. Redirect to sun. Saberwolf116 02:36, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:33, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. No, it isn't a sun; it's a "lozenge." Another thing it isn't is funny. A related article was listed on QVFD yesterday. This one must have slipped through. Spıke Ѧ 11:19 23-Aug-10 Delete...But I suspect we will be seeing this somewhere else very soon. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:40, August 23, 2010 (UTC) O))) --Wilytank 20:45, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's cute, yet pointless at the same time. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 21:03 Monday, August 23, 2010 Delete. I beleive in keeping this sort of formula to a minimum. For example I approve of AAAAAAAAA! but, being the first of such pages it makes Developers! redundant. If we have Snowman we're done, no further pages needed.--Count of Monkey Crisco 18:40, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticePSX 07:56, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

War of Rock

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. You can't swing a bag of dicks around here without hitting a shitty fake war article. pillow talk 18:47, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I swear I VFDed something almost exactly like this a few months ago. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:50, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete.Unfunny doodling here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:57, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Delete.Yeah, we get it. Nobody likes a -core loving hipster. --Wilytank 00:32, August 26, 2010 (UTC) Delete.War is often pointless, and so is this article. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 02:22, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Congress

Score: 7
Keep (0)
Delete (7)	--Elassint 22:28, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete. & redirect to United States Congress, which isn't much better, but could be made useful as a link to other pages. --Mn-z 22:44, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Huff --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:10, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Delete. any articel that starts the See Also section with "The Beginner's Guide to Being an Uncyclopedian, Seriously." can't be all bad can it... oh, wait....  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  25 Aug 2010 ~ 05:44 (UTC) 05:44, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Delete. VFD tag added. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 02:28, August 26, 2010 (UTC) ...oh, my. Now this... is bad. A... dress. Yes. Quite. I rather think this is one at which I can happily scream DIE! ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100826 - 04:06 (UTC) Delete. Get a bucket. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:17, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Tyre Pressure

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	I don't read Uncyclopedia to learn how to change tires, thanks. Saberwolf116 20:44, August 24, 2010 (UTC) It made me laugh, actually, but it's still not funny. pillow talk 21:13, August 24, 2010 (UTC) I came here wanting to find something to yell KILL! at... this doesn't quite meet that low standard of horror and rage, but I do find myself wondering... this is an article? (Yeah, that's a delete, albeit a wimpy one.) ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100825 - 04:14 (UTC) HUFF WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE!  --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:14, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Deflate. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:19, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Dates in Star Wars

Score: 7
Keep (0)
Delete (7)	Disintegrate. Short n' shitty 05 stub. Saberwolf116 01:24, August 25, 2010 (UTC) HUFF WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE But, keep the image. Also, I'm back. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:09, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 07:56, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Kill nonsensical and stupid and old --Elassint 20:53, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Kill the fuckers. --Wilytank 00:34, August 26, 2010 (UTC) Yaaaaaay! An article I can yell KILL! at! Because it's short, crappy and old, what a glorious combination. *beams* ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100826 - 03:43 (UTC) Delete. Condemned. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:14, August 26, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Wars of the Roses

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Delete. Face, meet palm. pillow talk 18:49, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Waste, meet potential. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:16, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Epic, meet fail. Saberwolf116 23:57, August 24, 2010 (UTC) HUFF WITH EXTREME PREJUDICE!  --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 05:15, August 25, 2010 (UTC) Delete.. A wretched list thing. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:56, August 25, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

9/11 WTC controlled explosion

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep. Have moved to a user page too. This has some funny, and can use more but that's easy to do. The missle photo is hilarious (boat wakes being mistaken for missles). There are way too many pages on VFD, I'm limited for time this week and when I log on there's 15 VFD pages or so to look at, and can't do it. Someone save the photos into categories, etc. Aleister 15:09 23 8
Delete (6)	Aw hell naw. Is this supposed to be funny? Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 00:20 Monday, August 23, 2010 Delete. My head hurts trying to understand whether this is Truthers trying to whore Uncyclopedia with a sugar coating, or conservatives trying to ridicule Truthers. In any case, the Cheney-Satan-Halliburton claim is trite unless an author has something clever to add. This guy doesn't. Spıke Ѧ 00:38 23-Aug-10 wtf —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 02:03, 23 August 2010 (UTC) Delete. Seems kind of like a personal essay to me. And, as such, it belongs only in userspace. pillow talk 21:29, August 23, 2010 (UTC) D3lete I put the '3' in the word 'delete' to be zany. This isn't funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:07, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Scrap. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:11, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Spot, when you see that Edit Conflict message, the reason not to bull on forward is that you will thereby undo other people's votes on other articles, as you did. Spıke Ѧ 00:38 23-Aug-10 Sorry about that. I didn't see an edit conflict message, or else I'd have tried again later. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 00:52 Monday, August 23, 2010 Happened somehow; Wilytank with the repair. Cheers. Spıke Ѧ 01:02 23-Aug-10

Pierre Boulez

Score: -2
Keep (2)	Try it now. Spıke Ѧ 20:32 21-Aug-10 Yep, that's a save. pillow talk 21:37, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (0)	Disintegrate. Am I missing something? Saberwolf116 15:31, August 21, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Wikipedia says that Boulez (1925-__) is a composer of "atonal" music (gack!) panned as "akin to compulsion neurosis"--and that is before he entered his Experimental Phase. Eminently apt for ridicule (as was "P.D.Q. Bach"). Our article is merely bickering quotes and a table on penis size. Start over, someone, if you care. Spıke Ѧ 18:56 21-Aug-10
Comments	Decent enough, I suppose. Much better then the quote cruft, at any rate. Saberwolf116 03:39, August 22, 2010 (UTC) Kreplach. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:14, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

Is (was)

Score: -2
Keep (4)	weak keep mildly clever, not worse than useless for someone who wants to expand it, and better than is. --Mn-z 15:22, August 21, 2010 (UTC) Is pretty cool. --Some Idiot 08:42, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Weird. I like it. pillow talk 21:39, August 23, 2010 (UTC) I like it too. Don't kill the is was! (And it really is. Better than is, I mean.) ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100824 - 02:54 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Huh? Saberwolf116 15:15, August 21, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Stubby listcruft and babble covering some of the same ground as Is, to which any good stuff should be moved. Spıke Ѧ 18:51 21-Aug-10
Comments	Strange title-- I'd call it Is. I lol'd when I read the article; perhaps it can be salvaged as more content for the Is article. Bob the Wikipedian 16:47, August 21, 2010 (UTC) Is kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 21:00, August 24, 2010 (UTC)

World War π

Score: 6
Keep (1)	Keep. Would math savvy people find this funny? I don't know, I'm not math savvy, but it reads like the author was and was aiming the page at his fellows. And it's not that bad either. Why are all the war pages being destroyed here? Aleister 14:07 24 8 We've declared a war on war, apparently. I'm maths-savvy, and find this more of a non-sequitur name-dropping extravaganza. Sir MacMania GUN—[16:15 24 Aug 2010]
Delete (7)	Pi! GET IT? GET IT? Saberwolf116 22:02, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Unless someone comes up with World War 2.7182818283 etc etc.  Sir MacMania GUN—[22:04 23 Aug 2010] Delete. Not funny in the least. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 22:11 Monday, August 23, 2010 Delete. You know this war didn't exist, and thus the authors aren't bound by reality, as in fact they aren't bound by coherence or humor either. The intro stresses the article's unimportance, and a paragraph before the intro chats with the reader. What follows is a super-long collection of anything that fits merely by being either false or incoherent. Or just unreadable: "It should be of no interest to note that...." Wow, a reverse Encyclopedia Cliché. And toward the end, of course, we get some <math>--a sure sign of gibberish. Spıke Ѧ 22:13 23-Aug-10 "You know this war didn't exist". No, really? ;-) --UU - natter 09:37, Aug 24 Delete. Hnng. --UU - natter 09:37, Aug 24 Delete. So bye bye Miss World War π. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:11, August 24, 2010 (UTC) Drove the function to the limit and the limit was ϕ Sir MacMania GUN—[16:15 24 Aug 2010] And then suddenly Carl Gauss and Riemann said bye / singing "our work's got no relation to π" Sir MacMania GUN—[16:31 24 Aug 2010] Delete. Shut your pie hole. --Wilytank 15:15, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Alzer-56

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep. Nice pics, uncategorized. I don't have time to do it, will the nominator please categorize the pics when a VFD nom is put up? Thanks. Aleister 15:14 23 8
Delete (6)	Vape. Another post-ICU disaster. In case you are the type who doesn't bother to RTFA, I will summarize this article for you: Some quotes, a three-line intro, and a body consisting of lots of lists and images. Also, that Weegee image creeps me the hell out. --Andorin Kato 06:22, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Although I feel if this is helped out a bit it could have a chance. --Some Idiot 08:33, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The only chance it has is a chance to annoy people. --Count of Monkey Crisco 10:55, August 23, 2010 (UTC) The band is a big fans of dinner and skate. And it's bandcruft, and heavy on the vanity, and it's written in pidgin English that is not endearing but all the way to inept. Spıke Ѧ 11:22 23-Aug-10 Unredeemable garbage. pillow talk 21:26, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Ugh. --Wilytank 23:42, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

The Twilight Saga

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Vape. I ICU'd this and the author removed the tag after (apparently) 'improving' it... but it still isn't funny. --Andorin Kato 06:17, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. However, I feel most of this could be saved and merged into the article the existing Twilight (book) article. --Some Idiot 08:37, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Starts badly, with a template telling potential vandals to "go fuck yourself," as though the article were a thing of value, and an intro that discloses that author hates the novels and their author, and is not clever nor good at grammar. The rest simply finishes making the "point," then has a collection of links to external sites. Move to Facebook and see if anyone Friends it. Spıke Ѧ 11:27 23-Aug-10 Delete. There's satire and there's ranting, and I don't think this guy knows the difference. pillow talk 21:25, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Like going down a hill, it ends lower than it starts. Leutnant Herr Thatdamnedfollowspot 21:40 Monday, August 23, 2010
Comments

Cadillac

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Wikipedia-ish article with no funny. Saberwolf116 16:49, August 22, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Humor inadequate.--Count of Monkey Crisco 10:19, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Section 1 is indeed a direct spork, probably from Wikipedia, with no humor added. Section 2, however, is a passable effort at satirizing real attributes of the car. But it's tiny, and there's no photo, and I've never even ridden in one, so let's let someone start over. Spıke Ѧ 11:38 23-Aug-10 Wow, I don't think the author had any idea where he was going when he started this one. pillow talk 21:35, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

BMW

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. A large pile of suck. Saberwolf116 16:49, August 22, 2010 (UTC) Ugh. Wankery If I want to jack off, I'll use my penis. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 3:41 PM 8/22/10 -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 19:46, Aug 22 Delete. Where it's not predictable, it's tedious. pillow talk 21:39, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

WW1.5

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Per the guy on the talkpage. Saberwolf116 21:37, August 22, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I'll quote the guy: "It is either incoherent or just not funny throughout." In fact, it's both, a Wacky War consisting of nothing but a jumble of nationalities. Spıke Ѧ 21:49 22-Aug-10 Delete. Not another of these damn things. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:40, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. These articles usually deliver shit. This one doesn't disappoint.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:57, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. per everyone above; how did we get so infested with these fucking things? pillow talk 21:32, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Pembrokeshire

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. A bunch of trite put-downs (sex with farm animals? anal sex? chavs? homos at a snooker bar? women with fishy vaginas?). Not clever in the least. Editors are all Anons. Spıke Ѧ 18:48 21-Aug-10 Delete. It has a concept; but it's not one we need on this site, and its execution is ranty and unfunny. Reminds me of a toned-down ED article.--HM (T) 18:49, August 21, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 02:39, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. In the crap there was this observation: Pembroke Dock is a dark seshpit. Perhaps the writer has a speech impediment or learnt the word from someone who has. I know what a cesspit is and this article smells very much of the latter. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:54, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Work continued overnight, on a chippie in Chaverford run and patronized by "dune coons." (Imagine, Arabs in Wales!) Protecting the page against Anons is reasonable, except that it would lock out ALL the authors, and someone would still have to deal with the swill that's on the page now. Spıke Ѧ 16:30 22-Aug-10

Acura

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Not funny. At all. Saberwolf116 16:49, August 22, 2010 (UTC) Delete. No, it isn't. From hillbillies to Hitler, slams in place of humor; red-links galore; and history-of-the-future. Spıke Ѧ 16:59 22-Aug-10 Delete. Ugh. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 02:07, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Missed the turn for 'funny' early on and went straight into the river. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:49, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Moveable Type

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Short and shit. Saberwolf116 16:49, August 22, 2010 (UTC) Delete. (Why not "movable"?) I was prepared to rescue this, as Gutenberg and Uncyclopedia are at opposite ends of the same heroic spectrum. But it's not what you think. Force-fitting "moveable type" into a car model is just senseless--as senseless as the prose in the article. Spıke Ѧ 16:54 22-Aug-10 I like the idea, _____ Type is used to describe some car models, however the article proper was terrible. --Nikau 15:48, August 23, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Moveable type and car models? Except it isn't so that's a double failure! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 18:46, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

PT Cruiser

Score: 6
Keep (0)
Delete (6)	Over 5 years? Seriously? Saberwolf116 05:32, August 22, 2010 (UTC) OH GOD I JUST RIPPED ASS -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 05:58, Aug 22 Delete. See ^. (And yes, despite this being funny: Ownership of a PT Cruiser is generally considered an outward sign of poor brain development.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  22 Aug 2010 ~ 08:55 (UTC) Oh for fuck's sake. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at09:09, Sunday 22 August 2010 - Delete. From the slam that Happytimes quotes, it deteriorates to memes and unconnected falsehoods. Spıke Ѧ 13:05 22-Aug-10 5 more years! —fj0j3ddjoaw;rfjaew (r30qjd) 02:06, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Meh. Ok saber; I charge you with reviewing every article in the Cars template and nominating all the crap before you move on to other things.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  22 Aug 2010 ~ 08:55 (UTC) I can do that. Saberwolf116 16:24, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

World War VII

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Pointless future war article. Again. Saberwolf116 15:47, August 21, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Another article on war written by a child who knows nothing about war--or humor. Unites memes of American politics: a diabolical Dick Cheney and an anti-American Al Gore. Also cameo appearances by Bush, Kerry, and Rommel, even though the time-line is 2100-2143. Just stupid. Spıke Ѧ 19:00 21-Aug-10 Ugh. --Wilytank 00:11, August 22, 2010 (UTC) penispenispenis -- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 06:54, Aug 22
Comments

Template:Fat

Score: 7
Keep (0)
Delete (7)	Delete.You know, this really belongs on QVFD, but it's used on two or three pages and has been here for a few years. It's woefully miscategorized and my rationale should be self-explanatory. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 06:08, August 21, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 06:13, August 21, 2010 (UTC) Don't forget to your lap bands. IronLung 08:45, August 21, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It shouldn't be made easier for people to insert this inept greeting card into an article. Spıke Ѧ 08:49 21-Aug-10 Delete. Because its taking me longer to vote to delete this template than it did to create it. --Mn-z 12:05, August 21, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. Unnecessary. Saberwolf116 15:07, August 21, 2010 (UTC) Delete.--Elassint 16:56, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Greg Mulholland

Score: 2
Keep (0)
Delete (2)	Delete. It was shit when I wrote it, it wasn't funny then and it's never going to be in future. In fact, probably ought to be QVFD. Srsly, I'm embarrassed by it. User:Gladstone/sig 21:18, August 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Per author request in part, and per "wow, he's an obscure politician, it was always going to be a tough ask to make any kind of decent article on him" protocol in part. --UU - natter 11:17, Aug 20
Comments	Abstain in deference to the author, and because I don't know enough about English politics. Otherwise I'd vote Keep; it's about a real guy and seems to be based on real stuff (such as his eyebrows). Could improve by stealing a photo (perhaps shoop the one on Wikipedia to exaggerate his eyebrows); and don't just call the guy a liar, make fun of some specific lies, thereby replacing all the material about pissing. Spıke Ѧ 21:41 19-Aug-10

Plumage

Score: -3
Keep (5)	Keep. Decent enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:32, 18 August 2010 Keep! This article is obviously high-brow humor filling a niche market witnessed by the more than 50 links attached to it. The subtle jokes contained within the links are nothing but genius, making this article my go-to reference when educating noobs or explaining cross-linking in forums or talk pages. I chuckle & laugh excessively every time I read it. (I think the author must be brilliant.)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  18 Aug 2010 ~ 04:09 (UTC) Keep. Not bad enough to delete. However, the article uses two different concepts of Plumage, where it probably should use just one. I think it shows promise. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:31, August 18, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Not great, but it doesn't need deleting. ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100819 - 21:05 (UTC) Keep. per above. --Mn-z 12:06, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (2)	Disintegrate. Unfunny ramble vaguely related to Uncyclopedia. Saberwolf116 20:37, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Self-important. No, pseudo-intellectual. Spıke Ѧ 01:53 18-Aug-10
Comments	That's a keep. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 15:57, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Slenderman

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. WTF? Seems pointless and unfunny to me. Anyone get anything from it? --UU - natter 11:04, Aug 20 Delete. When Ten-year-olds Try Stand-up Comedy. Spıke Ѧ 13:11 20-Aug-10 Delete. I sure didn't get anything from it. And embedded flash? This is an encyclopaedia, not... a... um... flash exhibition. ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100820 - 18:03 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:08, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Sonning Common

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. Short and crappy towncruft. --UU - natter 11:04, Aug 20 Delete. You don't say! The health centre is crowded and pub prices are too high? Yawn. Spıke Ѧ 13:09 20-Aug-10 Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 21:14, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I yawn, you lose. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 8:27 AM 8/21/10
Comments

Spangland

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Delete. Disappointingly, not an article about Spang's homeland. Even more disappointingly, it's short 'n' shit. Get rid. --UU - natter 11:04, Aug 20 Delete. Short essay about a made-up thing; random isn't funny. Spıke Ѧ 13:06 20-Aug-10 Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 18:10, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. if anyone is wondering, this is not part of some ancient in-joke nor did Spang have anything to do with the page. --Mn-z 21:15, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank 02:10, August 21, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Saga of the Storm: Part One

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	WRONG! While Uncylopedia is a melting pot for many types of humor and countless humorous themes it's not a place which you can use to store any damn thing. This completely serious and badly written alterna-historical political drama does not belong here, especially since it seems to be copied. On a purely qualitative level I detest its "Location name, Person name: Boy, things are sure different than the way real history was with the wrong sides fighting eachother. Lets sets set up some plot hooks and loose ends that will never get fucking resolved bacause the next author will skip to a new character in another country now." format. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:20, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete.It's essentially a vanity piece and should have been moved to the user's page. If that person is no longer active then I recommend deletion. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:50, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's a bleepin' novel! and neither funny nor compelling reading. Spıke Ѧ 08:14 20-Aug-10 Delete. Pretty much condemns itself with that opening. --UU - natter 11:19, Aug 20
Comments

Saga of the Storm: Part Two

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	WRONG! Short summary: It's bad at what it is and what it is isn't for Uncyclopedia. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:20, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Vanity. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:51, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. As with Part One. Spıke Ѧ 08:16 20-Aug-10 Delete. I really did try to read it all, but this could put you to sleep if you'd just downed a gallon of Red Bull. --UU - natter 14:10, Aug 20
Comments

McDonald's/McMenu

Score: 8
Keep (0)
Delete (8)	McCrap. Basically nothing but a long, pointless list of words that start with "Mc", or just regular words with "Mc" added on to them. Also, don't worry about the Jesus pic; it's used in other articles, so it'll be saved. Saberwolf116 03:16, August 20, 2010 (UTC) McDelete --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:49, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I am sure it has missed at least another 1000 Mc jokes. McList Cruft. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:55, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete.Per Saberwolf. --Some Idiot 08:00, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Dittoes. Spıke Ѧ 08:04 20-Aug-10 Delete. McHnng. --UU - natter 11:09, Aug 20 Delete. What the wolfy said. ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100820 - 16:44 (UTC) McWTF? seriously.. why do people still make McJokes? --Mighty-Potato 16:45, August 20, 2010 (UTC) McDelete. pillow talk 17:10, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Mighty-Potato has been permabanned for page-blanking, ass-hattery, and Jew-baiting. Spıke Ѧ 19:55 20-Aug-10 Unless there's any objections, I'll mark him out. Saberwolf116 20:40, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Splintern Hemisphere

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Delete. Classic nonsensical '06cruft. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:43, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Hinoa in '06 said, "As it stands right now, this article sucks. You have one week to make it better, or it'll go up in smoke." Author took eight months to grow it from a single paragraph to a preemie. Memes, nonsense words, ramble. Spıke Ѧ 02:39 20-Aug-10 Delete.. I hope it goes but I expect the Old Guard will come out and defend this article as an example of Ye Olde Uncyclops when this website was twice as funny etc..etc... --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:00, August 20, 2010 (UTC) You weren't here during the great 2005cruft purges, were you? Good times... --UU - natter 11:11, Aug 20 Delete. Because it sucks. --UU - natter 11:11, Aug 20 The horror... "It's parody" - horrid. And the article sucks, too. ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100820 - 17:59 (UTC)
Comments

Flakey Puff

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. Another dead from the concept article, this time full of lists and the sort of ambiguous phrasing that makes Spike poop blood. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:10, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. The phrasing is ambiguous because the author proudly doesn't know what he's talking about, or writing about, so this is a stubby heap of guesswork and speculation, versus going away and thinking harder for half an hour. PS--The gassy phrasings that really set me off involve invoking bickering experts. Spıke Ѧ 01:35 20-Aug-10 Delete. Flakey flapdoodle. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:03, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Utterly pointless. --UU - natter 11:12, Aug 20 Nein which I believe means "no" - for obvious reasons --Mighty-Potato 16:48, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Mighty-Potato has been permabanned for page-blanking, ass-hattery, and Jew-baiting. Spıke Ѧ 19:55 20-Aug-10

Condoleezza Rice Cooker

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. It's a pun based on a persons name which happens to sound like a food. There's nothing wrong with it except for the poor basic concept. It's just not funny. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:14, August 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not only is it what the Count said, it is nothing else, such as based on any actual attributes of Ms. Rice. Author may have wanted "effective anti-George Bush devices" but Condy, rumored as a 2008 Presidential candidate (mostly to whip up donors), is out of politics and losing her usefulness as a meme--like her former boss. Spıke Ѧ 23:25 19-Aug-10 Delete. Yawn. --UU - natter 11:13, Aug 20 Delete. Not good, and time has passed for it to be worth fixing. ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100820 - 16:42 (UTC)
Comments

Imperial College

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. This was up on VFD last year and got a 4 to 0 vote in favor of huffing but it escaped on a technicality. It has improved little since then. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:54, August 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete. As before. 21:29 All that has happened since its VFD nomination last 29-Dec is that Anons have translated small pieces of it into Leet. Spıke Ѧ 21:34 19-Aug-10 Delete. About time. --UU - natter 11:14, Aug 20 Disintegrate. Didn't laugh. Saberwolf116 19:51, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

The Covenant (Halo)

Score: 2
Keep (1)	"Keep":Pretty much my fault its sucks (as well as a few ip's faults) but I made this during my beginner years. Yet I can fix it up, but if it loses the votes then at least put it on my userspace--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 21:38, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (3)	Belongs on Halopedia. This is essentially an article outlining the Halo franchise, with no humor to speak of other than an occasional insult. Saberwolf116 21:10, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Agreed; seems designed mostly to inform, not to amuse. Look at all the IPs in the history! Spıke Ѧ 21:36 16-Aug-10 Delete. Continually switches from unfunny to unnecessary and back again. Looks like a 3rd grader tried to rewrite the instruction manual from memory. No dissection or deeper parody of the subject matter and entire 10+ line paragraphs exist without even attempting a joke.. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:34, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	I look forward to the new version.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  18 Aug 2010 ~ 04:31 (UTC) No contest. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 19:55, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

The Worst article ever written

Score: 4
Keep (2)	Week keep This article is as advertised; which to me, is funny.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  19 Aug 2010 ~ 05:05 (UTC) Wait! this argument goes to say, the title immunizes any content as long as it's sufficiently bad. Spıke Ѧ 21:27 19-Aug-10 Keep. Just so we can point our worst writers in this direction and say "Go play with this and stop messing up the rest of Uncyclopedia". It's like those Vandalism:Example on Wheels things. If pushed to the upper limit of Uncyclopedia cruft types and cliché it becomes parody. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:00, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Delete. Quite apart from anything else, it isn't, even. What it is is an idea that's been done before, and this time isn't done hugely well. It's a bit of suck that no-one cares about (nothing links to it, the author hasn't been seen since leaving us this gem) and won't be missed. So get rid. --UU - natter 11:24, Aug 18 Delete. I got through the intro. Get rid. Spıke Ѧ 11:59 18-Aug-10 Smarchuary 32, 458769 B.C.. Saberwolf116 20:06, August 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It's not bad enough to be the worst but deserves elimination for the author's belief that it is. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:21, August 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete. What they said. *points up* ~ *sqlorsh* (harass) (stalk) -- 20100819 - 21:16 (UTC) Delete. Per UU. --Some Idiot 08:02, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

List of Mortal Kombat Characters

Score: 4
Keep (1)	Keep. I'll admit it: I haven't fully read this article. I've skimmed it and read a few parts and captions, chucked & laughed; and what I've seen tells me it's pretty funny for game related material.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  18 Aug 2010 ~ 07:09 (UTC)
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. I'll admit it: I haven't fully read this article. I've skimmed it and read a few sections, and what I've seen tells me this must be huffed. This is a giant motherload of gamecruft, and very few of these people are actually Mortal Kombat characters. Saberwolf116 03:14, August 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. No, I didn't get through it either. But what I read was all punches in the genitals and fart jokes. Please get the rest of the way through puberty. Spıke Ѧ 11:45 18-Aug-10 Delete. Written in a world where you would live and breath this game and never leave your bedroom to wash. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:30, August 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete I dipped my quality cock in this article flange and it came out a funny green colour. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:48, August 19, 2010 (UTC) Delete. A large pile of suck. --UU - natter 11:15, Aug 20
Comments

Enter the Dragon

Score: -4
Keep (5)	Keep. Wilytank's complaints are defects in execution. It is listy and childish in places, but it's about a real movie, mostly topical, and mostly decent. Ballistic001 went on a brief randumbo spree in Aug-07 and the article is essentially unchanged since then. Spıke Ѧ 02:22 18-Aug-10 Keep. Per Spike. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:30, 18 August 2010 Keep. for this: "Despite being named Enter the Dragon a single Dragon is never seen in the movie. Similar to Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon. In which all the tigers and dragons are either crouching or hiding."  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  18 Aug 2010 ~ 07:06 (UTC) Keep. Not that bad. A swift listicide and minor spelling tidy leaves an article worth expanding, but not worth getting rid of. --UU - natter 11:37, Aug 18 Keep. Per UU. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:50, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (1)	Delete. Almost worked, but the unrelated pop-culture references ruined it. --Wilytank 01:58, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Kept --ChiefjusticePSX 07:50, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

AAAAAAAAA!

Score: -1
Keep (3)	AAAAAA AAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:51, August 19, 2010 (UTC) Keep per Featuredness seriously people. --Mn-z 01:47, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Keep. Mn-z offers a Keep on prestige; I have one based on analysis. I was originally against this, as it isn't English. But it is hilarious. It has only one real joke--but its illustrations tell it in a variety of ways, each of which is good for an additional laugh. Spıke Ѧ 02:26 20-Aug-10
Delete (2)	Um, no. Just not funny. It's shit. Wild at Heart, he who cleans up (Yell at me) 22:16, August 19, 2010 (UTC) Kerkill As a Muslim, this offends me. It's as though the Pope is screaming at me. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:03, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Invalid. It's a featured article. Also, it's an old in-joke. I don't like it, but it's a vital part of our history. Saberwolf116 22:36, August 19, 2010 (UTC) There's nothing about featured articles being exempt from deletion. It's just perceived that it would be saved and therefore pointless to nominate. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 23:03, August 19, 2010 (UTC) Ok, but you'll have to fix the 2300 red links it'll leave behind if it does get deleted. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:10, August 19, 2010 (UTC) I think there is a general feeling that featured stuff should not be deleted. If that has changed, then nom some of the obscure crap from 2005 and leave the notable crap from '05 alone. --Mn-z 01:47, August 20, 2010 (UTC) Invalid. Nominated by a permabanned user. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:17, 19 August 2010 How did he nominate it if he's banned? Spıke Ѧ 02:26 20-Aug-10 Fuck all of you -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:32, August 20, 2010 (UTC)

Things that don't exist

Score: -2
Keep (6)	Keep Did I mention that I have Windows 7? It's so much better than everything. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:41, August 16, 2010 (UTC) iKeep Edited to take out the stupid on the list. Not so bad now, and a good concept. I'll prune the lead next. T'aint so bad. Aleister 14:55 16 8 p.s. Pruned the lead. Just had another look. It's still nothing but a list. My vote stands. --UU - natter 15:05, Aug 16 Mine too--a list that basically has no point to make. Sec. 1 is still self-congratulatory after wisely being pruned to a single sentence. Spıke Ѧ 15:11 16-Aug-10 Yes, it is a list of things that don't exist. Ha ha ha. Hee hee hee. Yuckety yuck, or probably just "yuck!" Oh well. Aleister 15:08 16 8 Keep. A lot less horrible thanks to Aleister's edits. Could use some images though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:07, 16 August 2010 I'll vote Keep. again, after SPIKE's rewrite and additions. Makes me want to list lots of things in a list. Aleister 15:36 16 8 Pretty soon we're going to have to feature it. Al Keep. (Formerly Delete.) The list is big but no longer ugly; I've edited most entries to actually make a point. Someone did come in with an illustration too. Spıke Ѧ 15:54 16-Aug-10 Keep. Actually made me chuckle. --—John Lydon 07:03, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Keep. <-- this vote no longer can be added to the page.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  18 Aug 2010 ~ 04:27 (UTC)
Delete (4)	# Disintegrate. I'm sure I don't need to explain why. Saberwolf116 01:02, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It is nothing but a big, ugly list; listcruft; a magnet to people who can't write complete sentences. A potentially infinite list, as for everything that exists, there is at least one thing that doesn't (that same thing with three buttocks). Only one of the items in this list even makes a point, regarding the nonexistence of "A good reason to install Windows 7" (and the rendering of this joke in the article is inept). Most of the items in the list are memes (Jesus/Jebus/Jewsus/Jewbus) that assume their mere mention will provoke laughter. And the only complete paragraph ends by begging for the article's survival. Spıke Ѧ 01:11 16-Aug-10 Delete. It's the listcruft motherload. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:38, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Horrible listcruft. Loopygrumpkins 05:38, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Delete.. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 05:54, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Hnng. --UU - natter 09:19, Aug 16
Comments	COMPLETELY REWRITTEN SINCE NOMINATION Spıke Ѧ 17:29 16-Aug-10 Used to be List of things that don't exist. I deleted the first two words, for the same reason that a Table of Contents just says, Contents. Spıke Ѧ 17:21 16-Aug-10 Some nice improvements, but it's still just a dumb list and has no reason to exist. I laughed, but the last section stinks, so I guess I'll 'stain. Saberwolf116 23:36, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Kept. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 18:37, August 19, 2010 (UTC)

Rambler

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Lives up to its title. Saberwolf116 03:19, August 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Is it just me, or are car articles right up there with future war articles in their "highly-likely-to-be-shit"ness? --UU - natter 10:08, Aug 18 Delete. Even the three real paragraphs before it dives into listcruft are merely a vehicle to take slaps at memes, from Clinton to Cheney. A real character study of the Rambler owner could be funny. Spıke Ѧ 11:52 18-Aug-10 Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:39, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	Recyclewrite. add funny or delete.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  18 Aug 2010 ~ 07:15 (UTC) What? --UU - natter 10:08, Aug 18 As a theoretical concept it's not bad. But in it's current form it's terrible. I'm on the fence because I can see it's potential, but have no desire to rewrite it myself.

The most interesting man in the world

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Delete. Don't be fooled - this is, effectively, just a list. And it's a list of the kind that normally graces Chuck Norris pages everywhere. Get rid. --UU - natter 11:21, Aug 18 Delete. Though some of the "jokes" are not, the concept for this article is lifted directly from US radio advertisements for a Mexican beer, I forget which. Spıke Ѧ 11:56 18-Aug-10 Delete. I don't drink beer. But when I don't, I don't drink Dos Xs. --Wilytank 14:10, August 18, 2010 (UTC) I may not vote often, but when I do, I vote on articles about Dos Equis commercials. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 20:39, August 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. mostly because sharks have a week dedicated to me, not him.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  19 Aug 2010 ~ 05:02 (UTC)
Comments

Valle Vilo

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. Can someone teach Ethine to add the odd ICU while she's on her categorisation sprees? This random little slice of suck should have died an easy death by now. --UU - natter 11:17, Aug 18 QVFD. A thumbnail bio of an "awsomely [sic] awsome [sic]....preformer [sic]." And Remedial English for the author. Spıke Ѧ 11:54 18-Aug-10 Delete. Clearly.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  19 Aug 2010 ~ 04:59 (UTC) Delete. Thanks to working with people who are music goths, I actually knew who this was without checking first. I know he's Finnish and doesn't like washing, two facts oddly missing from this stub. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:27, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

The Hsu vs. Church War

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Delete. Fucking what? --UU - natter 11:33, Aug 18 Delete. Evidently family-reunion vanity, before it descends into ramble. Spıke Ѧ 12:01 18-Aug-10 Obliterate. Randumbo. --Wilytank 14:14, August 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  19 Aug 2010 ~ 05:08 (UTC) Delete. Kick it into the bin. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:15, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Precious bodily fluids

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Disintegrate. Pointless disambiguation page which does nothing other than rehash a Dr. Strangelove joke. Saberwolf116 20:34, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not even a proper disambiguation page, but a recitation of names of bodily fluids, for users who forget the English words for them. Spıke Ѧ 20:55 17-Aug-10 I concur. Although we could do with a good Dr. Strangelove rehash with regard to Gen. Ripper's whole rant on communist fluoridation, and I could see how such an article could be done, this is not it.KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 20:58, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Crap and not needed. Ever. --UU - natter 10:01, Aug 18
Comments	Should we then continue on to delete EVERY article in the Tedious pop culture references category?  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  18 Aug 2010 ~ 04:16 (UTC)

The List

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Homosexual Japanese fox. Saberwolf116 20:13, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. A self-important spitoon of ramble on a variety of topics. Spıke Ѧ 20:19 17-Aug-10 Homosexual Japanese Fox needs its own page. Whatever "The List" is, does not. --KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 20:58, August 17, 2010 (UTC) EXTERMINATE!  Anyone telling me to think of Chuck Norris's Penis and multiply it by googlefuck deserves to see his work get burned. --Wilytank 02:02, August 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete. You know it's funny you say that because I actually think the Norris joke was done correctly and was the funniest thing in the whole article (the only funny thing really).  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  18 Aug 2010 ~ 04:34 (UTC)
Comments

The Forbes List

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Disintegrate. Unfunny listcruft that somehow escaped QVFD. Saberwolf116 03:16, August 18, 2010 (UTC) Delete.This article is really nothing but a series of random lists. The subject matter deserves much better. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:40, August 18, 2010 (UTC) Weak delete Although the material is factually accurate the article doesn't go beyond the initial joke. The lists, they do not help. A rewrite might change my mind.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  18 Aug 2010 ~ 07:12 (UTC) Delete. Lists. Just... lists. --UU - natter 10:05, Aug 18 QVFD. The real Forbes list is a list of wealthy people. Most have a profile on Wikipedia and most are idiosyncratic, whether Warren Buffett anxious to school newbies at an Omaha steak house or Bill Gates obsessively trying to prove that his wealth can be used for the good of society. There is a good concept here waiting to get out. By comparison, this article is just a list of words; not low quality, no quality. Spıke Ѧ 11:49 18-Aug-10
Comments

World War II the Two Towers

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. Not linked from anywhere, odd as anything, not edited in ages, not funny, long, Norrissed, and just not good. Get rid. --UU - natter 10:58, Aug 16 Delete. Maybe UnScripts. Probably oblivion. Spıke Ѧ 11:39 16-Aug-10 Delete. Hurry! Hurry!!. Read all about it, read all about it, Franklin.D.Roosevelt is a vampire! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:04, August 16, 2010 (UTC) I don't think so. Not even worthy of UnScripts. --Wilytank 01:37, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

The Raspberry Rippler

Score: 6
Keep (0)
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. Stupid article about a made up super hero. Saberwolf116 01:31, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Completely made up, with not even a shred of reality mixed in. Good for ice cream, bad for articles. --—John Lydon 06:46, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Yup, poorly written randumbo about something unreal. Useless quotes, gas in intro, pointless naughty talk about sexuality, listcruft, finale scolds the listener, tons of encyclopedia clichés. Spıke Ѧ 10:16 17-Aug-10 Delete. No. --Wilytank 12:13, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Bollocks. --UU - natter 12:26, Aug 17 Delete.. Not as funny as the Phantom Raspberry Blower (Brit tv reference). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:43, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Project Cletus

Score: 7
Keep (0)
Delete (7)	Why did this survive so long? Saberwolf116 00:16, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Because we're all asleep. If you want to use sarcasm to show that creationism is crap, by all means do so--though we already do it elsewhere. If you merely want to assert that they are all hillbilly troglodytes, go write a Letter to the Editor. Spıke Ѧ 00:31 17-Aug-10 Delete. Word for word per Spike. --—John Lydon 06:49, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Wilytank 11:56, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Sucks, y'all. --UU - natter 12:24, Aug 17 Delete.. Redundo Junko. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:45, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete.. Project Cletus is a massive effort to catalogue the names of every single person on the face of the Earth who is a creationist and whose name happens to be "Cletus". Starts with a bad premise, and gets worse. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 01:24, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Greggorio

Score: 8
Keep (0)
Delete (8)	Delete. Why would someone even bother writing this? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:14, 16 August 2010 OVER 9000!!!!!!11!!1!1!!1!! History of the future, nonsense year numbers, reliance on memes, an essay about a made-up city, and an encyclopedia cliché: "Although there are no records or credible evidence supporting these claims, it is now a widely accepted fact that...." Dumb. Spıke Ѧ 23:29 16-Aug-10 Disintegrate. I wouldn't mind seeing the Catholic church come crashing down, but this article is boring and a waste of space. Saberwolf116 00:13, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Completely random, made up nonsense that doesn't even begin to approach the realm of humor. --—John Lydon 06:52, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Pointless. --UU - natter 12:22, Aug 17 Ugh. No intelligent life detected. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 8:37 AM 8/17/10 Delete. I blame the parents. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:47, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Random, full of cliches, and not very amusing. About what one would expect from a story about an underground city populated by half-demon half-Eskimo spawn. The author must've hated Catholics and Eskimos. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 01:29, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

I Can't Believe It's Butter

Score: -3
Keep (3)	Keep. Once I'd reverted it to a kinder, gentler, simpler, time before banned User:METALHEADS101 got to it it's not so bad.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 07:29 (UTC) Keep. (Formerly Delete.) The past version Happytimes dredged up is exactly what I was asking for. Spıke Ѧ 13:22 15-Aug-10 Keep. lololololol --Wilytank 18:57, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Keep. I thought the nominator has to go through the past revisions? That discussion has happened a few times that I recall, and all regular nominators have seen it. Jesus Christ hanging on a pogo stick, jumping up and down, up and down. I saved one last week like this. Nice work Happytimes! Aleister 16:18 16 8 Keep. I like it. ~ Arajlas *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100816 - 23:17 (UTC)
Delete (0)	Delete. Anyone can make an article that spoofs the unusual name of a popular consumer product but it takes a special kind of dummy to bridge the gap to nonsense number and explosive dicks. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:37, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. If author just followed the lead of the photographs (which Aleister had better preserve!) and play it dead-pan, this article would have been good. Spıke Ѧ 01:41 15-Aug-10 Delete. wow that's terrible. We need this page, but not this version-- keep the template & pictures & rewrite the whole thing.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 07:05 (UTC)
Comments	If this survives I'll edit it, just let me know.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 07:29 (UTC) Comment. Now I'm ambiguous about it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:12, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Kept --ChiefjusticePSX 12:51, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Qui-Gon Jinn

Score: -3
Keep (4)	Keep. Bad: Quotes bicker with one another, nonsense year numbers, wacky parentage, too little actually based on the movies, especially when it slops over into other movies, memes everywhere. Good: The photos, the second caption, the suggestion that the Jedi trainers had one cynical eye on the box-office take. Wikipedia has more than anyone wants to know about this character, also interplanetary trade legislation. Spıke Ѧ 22:00 14-Aug-10 Keep. No one is going to do this topic any better.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 07:38 (UTC) If it's shit, then huff it. "It could only be worse" isn't a reason not to. Saberwolf116 07:41, August 15, 2010 (UTC) This I know. (I kinda like it.) Keep. Actually i found some of the quotes quite clever, some not however. Defiantly keep. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 16:53, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Keep. It needs love, not a deletion. And no, I'm not volunteering. Sorry. I have no love. ~ Arajlas *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100816 - 23:21 (UTC)
Delete (1)	No. Saberwolf116 20:56, August 14, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	It's a keeper --ChiefjusticePSX 12:51, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Americas High School

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Yeah, yeah, your school is the worst, we know. Saberwolf116 10:45, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Cites individual schoolteachers. Spıke Ѧ 11:37 16-Aug-10 Sucks --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 4:33 PM 8/16/10 Poo If the overall sad state of this article isn't enough to get it nuked, how about the fact that the author put Barry Sanders and Miley Cyrus on the same list?! For Shame!! --—John Lydon 06:56, August 17, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Sucks. --UU - natter 12:21, Aug 17
Comments	Author Wagleystew deleted this vote in progress, for which nominator upbraided him on his talk page. What, are all the bansticks being recharged? Spıke Ѧ  20:07 16-Aug-10 Chief handed his ass to him after I put him on Ban Patrol. Saberwolf116 20:13, August 16, 2010 (UTC)

Carney

Score: 7
Keep (0)
Delete (7)	Obliterate. I didn't laugh. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:24, 16 August 2010 Delete. Grade-school twerps, when asked to write an "essay," often use it as a carrier for an obscene acronym--and it goes from here to less clever. Spıke Ѧ 11:36 16-Aug-10 Delete. Suckage. --UU - natter 11:40, Aug 16 Delete. Carnal --Wilytank 12:33, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Drive-by drivel.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:00, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Dolphin Jesus. Saberwolf116 20:31, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Delete. This article is almost as bad as an actual carney --—John Lydon 06:58, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Weapons of Mass Conduction

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. Um, what? Been here since forever, and still sucks. --UU - natter 11:14, Aug 16 Delete. From the tiny intro: "I don't care which....This may not always be the case." Please don't make me write an encyclopedia article. I just want to screw around. Also, NRV. Spıke Ѧ 11:47 16-Aug-10 Delete. Start lame and limp along to the end. No thanks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:09, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. Saberwolf116 21:01, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Vowel market

Score: 5
Keep (0)
Delete (5)	Delete. Crappy little stub that's been here since forever, and still sucks. --UU - natter 11:14, Aug 16 Delete. This little puddle of babble is merely a carrier for the photograph, capturing a stellar moment in American broadcast history. Spıke Ѧ 11:44 16-Aug-10 Delete. This little piggy is not coming home. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:07, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. Stubby and unfunny. Saberwolf116 20:49, August 16, 2010 (UTC) D_l_t_ Wanna buy a vowel? --—John Lydon 07:06, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Will Arnett

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	Delete. I'm wondering why Rabbi Techno just moved this when he saw it and didn't ICU it. Seems quite random and pointless to me. --UU - natter 11:02, Aug 16 Delete. Meme-filled ramble breaks the encyclopedia canon early and often, and seems to be based on nothing in the actor's career. Spıke Ѧ 11:41 16-Aug-10 Disintegrate. The amount of shitty articles there are on Uncyclopedia is really quite depressing. Saberwolf116 20:40, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 4:41 PM 8/16/10
Comments

Nirvana

Score: -4
Keep (5)	No. I......I love it. It's probably one of the first articles I ever edited. DON'T DO THIS TO ME!!!!! --Roman Dog Bird 07:07, August 15, 2010 (UTC) keep!  A ha ha HA ha ha haa! (VFH)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 07:46 (UTC) Keep. Per Roman Dog Bird. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:07, 15 August 2010 Keep. The intro is too awesome for it to be deleted... The rest needs work however, but nothing worth deletion. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 03:15, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Keep. *kitty eyes* ~ Arajlas *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100816 - 23:15 (UTC)
Delete (1)	This article makes me want to blow my head off with a shotgun. Saberwolf116 07:03, August 15, 2010 (UTC) I see what you did there, funny!
Comments	An article on a real (and notorious) band, based on real information about the band. Goes downhill fast (with lists) toward the end, but not bad, for band-cruft. Spıke Ѧ 12:36 15-Aug-10 Kept. --ChiefjusticePSX 07:45, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE

Score: 6
Keep (6)	It's an instant Uncyc meme. Can't believe I'm switching sides with you all. You propose to delete a page that everyone so far in the Delete column enjoys? out of fear of what one bad actor might do? If we are afraid of being called racist, how many other articles must go? In enshrining this "product of racism," how can anyone claim we are celebrating racism? Dexter's excellent audio is a case study of a moron. Are we going to huff that too? But the article has no enduring value and, in a few months after the joke has passed, I'd join you on the Delete side. Spıke Ѧ 12:32 15-Aug-10 You calling me stupid, SPIKE? (with redneck voice) I'ma gonna kick yer ass from here ta Dawsonville! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:22, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:07, 15 August 2010 Keep. I think this article illustrates what a moron the poster is, implying that racism is for morons. I also think it makes a good in-joke, and should be archived as such. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 22:41, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Keep. per SLS. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 8:38 PM 8/15/10 Keeper The "keep" voters convinced me with logical thinking, and I'll join them. When a racist makes such noise, both before and after the page was locked, and continues to express his rage by creating racist user names and racist edits, the stupidness shows itself loud and clear. Please read the page under threat here again, and see why it deserves to be kept and even lionized as an example of old-time non-religion. Aleister 00:43 16 8 p.s. There seems to be someone claiming that the whole thing was a troll, an experiment, as was an earlier page that I played with and was more obviously a troll or sock. But does this change the creativity, a play-acting that many of us could do? I think the page was written well, and maybe even more interesting as a fictional rant. So my keep is a bit stronger with this new data. Keep I have a video version of my narrating this that keeps getting removed from YouTube because Bob Saget is fucking Amy Winehouse in the foreground. I'm in the background stroking someone's disemboweled penis, but that isn't at all horrifying since I have glued a wig to it and named it Frank. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:15, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Delete (12)	Okay, here's hoping this doesn't turn into a massive drama-fest... anyway, some background info for those not in the know. A few days ago a troll created an account and made a couple of racist, WHITE POWAH pages, one of which was his userpage. I figured it would be funny to annoy him by spamming this image over his userpage. When he was banned, he returned as an IP and made NIGGERS STOLE MY PAGE to rage about how the niggers had gotten his account removed. Now, a number of people find this funny, so I do not expect this VFD to succeed or at least to be decided without a bit of dissension. At first I thought the page was a funny example of a retard editing Uncyclopedia, and figured it'd be fine to keep it as a taunt. Now, though, I've done a one-eighty on that position because of HEY ASSHOLE!, a page made by the same troll, under a different IP, calling out RDB for blocking him and generally being an asshat. The creation and temporary popularity of that article made me realize that we are dealing with a recurring troll who, for all we know, was encouraged to continue his dickery by the fact that we not only kept, but celebrated, his other racist rant. Essentially, I'm saying that in holding up articles like this as acceptable and even outstanding, we feed the trolls. If we had simply huffed this article when it first appeared, he might have found that he is unable to provoke a response from Uncyclopedia, and gone away. So that's why I propose to vape this article: It's the product of racism and trolling, neither of which we want to encourage on here. --Andorin Kato 06:25, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Disintegrate. Amusing at first, but there simply isn't enough here to justify keeping it. Besides, I think we've been making too many extremely stupid and unfunny in-jokes that only the community gets as of late. Saberwolf116 06:37, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Y'know, even though I think it's hilarious, I've got to agree. Well, maybe not entirely, but still, I see what you're saying. At least there's his user page for me to laugh at forever and ever. Whatever, we don't need this (even though it rules and Dexter went to the trouble of making an audio version). EDIT after discovering some horrifying information: Yeah, fuck this, holy fucking shit. --Roman Dog Bird 06:49, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. It isn't funny, it doesn't endear itself to me in any way at all, the site can do without it and would be better for it. --ChiefjusticePSX 12:58, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Not funny, not redeeming... it's just there and I do not like it one bit. Not one bit at all. ~ Arajlas *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100815 - 13:24 (UTC) Delete Doesn't come from a good place. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:00, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Yeah. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 14:04, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:50, August 15, 2010 (UTC) And I still think someone was trying too hard. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 23:57, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I agree with what Woody has been saying. Pages like Dan Kwon are fine, because the person isn't trying to make their page an in-joke. Basically, it's not funny because it intends to be.--HM (T) 02:57, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Racism is only funny against Asians. --Happymonkey39 Dah Meme Master 03:12, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Ha! *snigger* he he he *snork*  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  16 Aug 2010 ~ 06:53 (UTC) Delete. Per Woody, and the fact that it isn't funny, and the fact that it sucks. --UU - natter 09:18, Aug 16 Delete from me too, just seems to be a tired variation on an ancient meme. We should have killed it at birth. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
Comments	Ah, since the article in question is locked, can a sysop add {{VFD}} to it? --Andorin Kato 06:33, August 15, 2010 (UTC) I added it to the talk page (since that's technically what we're supposed to do), just so someone won't call us out on it. Saberwolf116 06:37, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Abstain.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 07:44 (UTC) If this gets deleted, please move it to userspace. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:16, 15 August 2010 Anyone can copy the article into their userspace at any time. --Andorin Kato 03:05, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Abstain. I still think it's funny, but I just don't care anymore what happens to it. --Roman Dog Bird 00:54, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Moved from Keep section (also, both of you chill the feck out): Care to explain how I have bullied anyone since coming back? --Andorin Kato 02:28, August 16, 2010 (UTC) No. VFD isn't a discussion page. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 02:39, August 16, 2010 (UTC) VFD isn't a discussion page? Alright... then why would you make such a comment in the first place? I'm sure you're perfectly aware that things like that do nothing but stir up antagonism and drama. Except VFD is a discussion page. So come on. Demonstrate how my nomination of this article is in bad faith. Can you? Or was your earlier comment just a snide jab at my credibility, removed because you thought that would enable you to get away with it? --Andorin Kato 02:49, August 16, 2010 (UTC) No need for this drama! Nominator expressed the feelings of 12 people (and counting); no evidence of a vendetta toward author! Spıke Ѧ 15:13 16-Aug-10

Pelican

Score: 6
Keep (0)
Delete (6)	I don't get it. (Is this some sort of in-joke?)  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 08:16 (UTC) Vanity. But save the rare photo of the in-hiding US minority-party leader, which may be useful in a future UnNews. Spıke Ѧ 12:43 15-Aug-10 Delete.One for the gullet. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:09, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:04, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. - Remove the vanity and the lists, and there's just nothing left worth saving, except the picture. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 22:59, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. I have saved the picture on the picture section of the Articles section of my userpage. Loopygrumpkins 05:52, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

Miramonte high school

Score: 4
Keep (0)
Delete (4)	I. Don't. CARE. Saberwolf116 07:55, August 15, 2010 (UTC) vanity  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 08:03 (UTC) and cyber-bullying. Wow, another high school with a faculty "reign of terror." Which doesn't teach capitalization of proper names. Spıke Ѧ 12:40 15-Aug-10 Delete...Though made me think with this line '..hard academics and daunting halls..'. Not sure what it means but not enough to stop me from voting for this to be flushed away.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:05, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	See this: File:Theater.jpg & for vandalism?  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 08:02 (UTC)

I Think I'll Call It "Peach"

Score: 5
Keep (1)	keep Clearly the synopsis of the article fits nicely within the humor. Funny!  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 07:43 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Delete. Spike correctly noted that I Can't Believe It's Butter has some nice pictures. I check to see if the pictures were used on other articles. Well, turns out they are. Unfortunately they link to this dadaist, disjointed ramble about livestock. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:54, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Section 1 tells me author has a secret and it's up to me to understand his article correctly. Well aren't you precious. Spıke Ѧ 01:58 15-Aug-10 Wot? Eh, written by a ten-year-old? That's all very well and fine, but... there doesn't seem to be a point to it. ~ Arajlas *shifty eyes* (talk) (stalk) -- 20100815 - 13:29 (UTC) Delete.I think I call it something else: Clue. Rhymes with snap.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:54, August 15, 2010 (UTC) I think I'll call it "huffed" Saberwolf116 01:14, August 16, 2010 (UTC) Six strikes, you're out--HM (T) 03:00, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Comments	sigh Please move here: User:Happytimes/VFD/I Think I'll Call It "Peach".  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  16 Aug 2010 ~ 06:58 (UTC)

The Moon isn't Real

Score: 8
Keep (0)
Delete (8)	Delete. Theme completely disintegrates a few sentences in, then it's randomtime. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:23, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Smite. Shit man. The Sun Has Failed and now the moon isn't real? --Wilytank 01:26, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Uranus--Get it? Get it? Hardly worth the wear on my left-click button. Spıke Ѧ 01:30 15-Aug-10 Delete.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 07:41 (UTC) Haw. Haw. HAW. Saberwolf116 07:48, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Great trumpeting randumbo! What's all this then?--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:56, August 15, 2010 (UTC) UGH -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 22:48, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Hopefully, this article won't be real, either.--HM (T) 03:01, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
Comments

100 (number)

Score: 5
Keep (1)	Keep.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  15 Aug 2010 ~ 07:40 (UTC)
Delete (6)	Disintegrate. Just because it's old doesn't mean it's good. Saberwolf116 23:15, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Weak. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:33, August 14, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Dumb. Spıke Ѧ 23:42 14-Aug-10 Delete. You still here? I think you had the same Scottish doctor as the Libyan Al Megrahi! --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:00, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Weak delete Remove the lists, and we barely have any article left. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 22:52, August 15, 2010 (UTC) Delete. Get rid. --UU - natter 09:12, Aug 16
Comments	Kept (5-3) in June 2009. No one claimed it was any good; Romartus just claimed it had a lot of mileage on it and might suffer a natural death. Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion/archive183 sec. 6. Spıke Ѧ 23:42 14-Aug-10 I did? Oh I was wrong then (not for the first or last time!). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 14:58, August 15, 2010 (UTC)