From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Has absolutely no lead on the cyber grindcore band. Bore the clean up tag for almost a month, but SadisticWolf has more or less disowned this article. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 10:59 PM 7/4/10
- Delete. Pointless, not funny, not needed. Might as well get rid. --UU - natter 15:20, Jul 5
- Hey Olaf, sing Berserker. Olaf, Berserker. My love for you is ticking clock, Berserker! Would you like to suck my cock, Berserker!--Count of Monkey Crisco 21:21, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Even author wants it to die (see below). Spıke Ѧ 16:50 8-Jul-10
|
Comments |
- Suggest this is moved to Sadistic Wolf's home page rather than vote on deletion. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:37, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
- Sounds good to me. PS--Bandcruft needs more than just taking the names of their works and regurgitating them with puns or other transformations. Spıke Ѧ 02:30 6-Jul-10
- I don't care about that version. I've gotten slightly better at writing so I'm gonna wait for it to get raped from the face of the universe, then write it again. Also, @SPIKE, I didn't name any of their albums. I just made up random shit. --SadisticWolf 14:26, July 8, 2010 (UTC)
- Then that would be--random! I am behind you on this. Pushing. Spıke Ѧ 16:50 8-Jul-10
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Really rather dire. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 06:23, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Tosh from day one. Suspect it's vanity cruft as well. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:46, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Sucks Saberwolf116 20:24, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Ramblin' man.--Count of Monkey Crisco 21:41, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- EPA!!! EPA!!! --Wilytank 21:54, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Originally added to QVFD, but as it's been around a while I think we should put this to the vote. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 06:34, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Kill it. The first paragraph had me hopeful, but then it slips into middle-school level humor, vanity, and cyberbullying. —Pelozurian (talk) 06:44, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! Since it's somehow escaped from my QVFD nom, KILL IT WITH FIRE! DarkLight 06:56, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Sucks. --UU - natter 08:24, Jul 7
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Unfunny bandcruft. Wild at Heart, he who cleans up (Yell at me) 17:12, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Section 1 warns us that this band, founded "sometime between the invention of the wheel and the collapse of the Berlin Wall," will be described by text having little to do with the band. Until Section 4, which explains what each band member will do to your ass if you don't listen. Spıke Ѧ 17:58 6-Jul-10
- Delete. The only necessary Australian band is Destroyer 666. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 4:20 PM 7/6/10
- 'Delete. Also Severed Heads. Actually, now I think of it, they were quite shit. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 06:07, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Listy gamecruft that's not linked from anywhere. Yawn. Get rid. --UU - natter 10:52, Jul 5
- Delete. The intro loses me, as I don't know the internals of Hammer and will not benefit from a parody of it. The body of the article reveals a playful mind, but unfortunately playing with truly opaque material. He should move on to write jokes about the DOS Print Spooler. Ha ha ha ha ha! Spıke Ѧ 02:34 6-Jul-10
- Delete.. Since I had to link to Wiki to have any idea what this is about, I suggest this article is donated to the Big Daddy as their one is basically arse numbing cack. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:18, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Kill With an Aerial Assault Dylanlip (talk) 13:45, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete.. I have nothing else to do. 2K12_DAN.VRS 03:10, July 7, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (8) |
Moved 3 comments on the nature of war and/or the nature of McNamara to Talk:Robert McNamara, and replied. Spıke Ѧ 12:32 5-Jul-10
- Keep. ... Spıke Ѧ 02:56 30-Jun-10
- Total Keep ... Aleister 2:59 30 6 MMX
- Worked out all the kinks (most of the page), reworked the lead (most of the lead), enlarged and tweeked the pic and caption. Now I think it's short, sweet, and funny. Aleister 9:56 30 6 MMX
- It was short! I wrote some new stuff, along the lines of my vote above. Spıke Ѧ 12:29 30-Jun-10
- Keep. Spike did a rewrite and it's now keepable. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:37, 1 July 2010
- Keep.I can see the sticking plaster...may last a few more years until it is either sent down here again or improved by a passing fan/enemy of Robert McNamara. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:09, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. From bleh to meh. --UU - natter 09:16, Jul 2
- Keep. —Pelozurian (talk) 11:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:41, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep ... Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:50, July 5, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- EXTERMINATE! Not funny in any sort of way--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:09, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Piss --Wilytank 01:34, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- delete. if it's a noteworthy subject, that's fine, but if it's a bad article, delete it. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 06:45, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
Delete. If someone wants to rewrite it, fine, but all I'm seeing right now is deleteworthy suck. --UU - natter 08:56, Jun 30
- Delete. Nearly unusable no matter what the subject. --Count of Monkey Crisco 09:41, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Still not good. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 12:54, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- VFD doesn't have to be good, it just has to be non-VFD. Spike will probably work on the page, and I'll add in some more about this hustler McNamara, and it will be fine. Aleister 12:58 30 6 MMX
- What's here now is necessarily dark sarcasm rather than wackey madcap--Al's photo caption is the funniest thing on the page. I'll try to improve it further with similes and flourishes, not grues and Emo Hitlers. But it is no longer deleteworthy. 14:46 For better or worse, there is twice as much of it now. Spıke Ѧ 17:07 30-Jun-10
|
Comments |
- See my comment above in the keep section. Aleister
- Okay, here's a perfect example of what I've been talking about regarding voting. The numbers indicate this should go. But the page is not the page that was put up for VFD. It's a new page, saved by SPIKE. That's why there are holes in these rules. Just sayin'. Aleister 12:38 30 6 MMX
- You are usually talking about defects in the new (numbered) format, but this problem was a problem under the old format. I dislike the imprecision of voting on a moving target, but Uncyclopedia benefits enormously by using VFD to rehabilitate the site's worst articles--and we both have fun doing it. Please open a forum and make a specific proposal. Spıke Ѧ 13:14 30-Jun-10
- The vote is 6-0 Keep in the month of July. Spıke Ѧ 03:08 6-Jul-10
- Kept. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 07:08, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (8) |
- Keep. I love it! Loopygrumpkins 01:12, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Damn it, I was called away from a party to vote on this. A spliff in one hand and something I can't even describe in the other. On this, I tend to keep pages that established users love. I love a few. I've married one. And this nom in invalid, no VFD tag, so have to start over anyhow. Aleister 1:33 3 7 MMX
- eh. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 01:46, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. It's like Kaboom by MadMax. And has the real Audio file as well thanks to help from Spike. Cheers!--Funnybony 10:24, Jul 3
- Additional written stuff now on the page. There, I've put in things, and some more things, and now it has a story. Stories told around campfires. Alei 10:38 3 7
- Keep It made me smile. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:23, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, yes, and yes. This feels like something that would be in a spoof encyclopedia, don't you think? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 07:27 Jul 04, 2010
- Keep. Per above. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:22, 4 July 2010
- Keep. We've kept worse shit than this. --Matfen 17:25, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- Pointless, stupid stub. IronLung 22:14, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Shit Do I need to say it any clearer?--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 22:18, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- We don't need an article on this. —Pelozurian (talk) 22:45, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
Delete. Author Funnybony asked me for technical help on this article in early April, and my last correspondence on this page (User talk:SPIKE#Mac OS start-up sound) mentioned that it lacked any humor and suggested a story for what the sound really was. So my position is that the article still lacks humor. Am dying to know what Aleister held in his other hand. Spıke Ѧ 03:07 3-Jul-10
- What Aleister had in the other hand was the information for this subject, none of which I knew about, and it is now informative as a result of the VFD. I've always known that Spike was right, but I didn't have a clue. I think you'll all agree that thanks to Al it is now quite informative and even funny. And in its new form, as per advice of SPIKE, it is complete and does not need to be lost via deletion anymore. Please consider the current version only. Cheers!--Funnybony 01:29, Jul 4
- Problem solved; I rescind my vote; but I've deleted a tangent by which author tries to get people to read yet another chapter of his personal autobiography. Spıke Ѧ 12:03 4-Jul-10
- Spike is wrong, or should I say mistaken, here, I was the one who put the reference in, not Funnybony. And it fit within the context in which it was used. Aleister 17:58 4 7 MMX
- Delete. You've uploaded an MP3, bravo sir, bravo. --Count of Monkey Crisco 03:09, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Orson Welles, Tokyo Rose.etc.etc..all adds up to a hill of baked beans...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:27, July 4, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Absolute drivel about a lower league English footballer. Pointless, irredeemable tripe. Get rid. --UU - natter 15:12, Jul 5
- Delete. Accepting UU's word that this is about a minor-leaguer, it had better be good. It isn't, not at English, not at humor (relying on imagery such as "retarded dog amputees" that is supposed to obviate real humor), not at illustration (there are none). Move it to Analsexopedia. Spıke Ѧ 02:38 6-Jul-10
- Into The Light A hate ranter, random user, not very good writer joined us for a time, and then retreats into oblivion. Aleister 3:00 6 7
- Delete.Luckily the first few words of this rant were enough to warn anyone that what followed was a vat of unintelligent bile. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:20, July 6, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (6) |
- Keep. The concept is excellent: Ram together an inherently unpolitical audio player with the infamous Nazi regime. Execution is marred by serious rants against the Germans and the French. What it needs is to subtly work in more World War 2 phrases with no apparent understanding that there is anything repulsive about Naziism. 11:10 PS Done--though there's not much left. Spıke Ѧ 11:31 2-Jul-10
- Keep. Per above. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:50, 2 July 2010
- Keep. Spike's save. Aleister 13:23 2 7
- Keep. I think it can be made better.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 16:38, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:45, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- that's offensive! SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 01:45, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. After reading Spike's revision, I have changed my mind. Loopygrumpkins 04:52, July 3, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
Delete. This article isn't funny. It's just another Nazi/Holocaust cliche. I don't see any way that this could be improved so that it isn't just another randumb Nazi article. Loopygrumpkins 05:10, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete.. Remove it before the History Channel commission this for a five part series. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:21, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. NRV'd (remember that?) back in '06, and that was about right. --UU - natter 09:27, Jul 2
|
Comments |
If anyone thinks of a way to improve this article so that it is something new and genuinely, tell me and I may change my vote. Loopygrumpkins 05:13, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: -5
|
Keep (6) |
- Lulwut? I'm totally on the same wave-length as the guy who wrote this was on. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 08:27, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Weak keep I liked it, but its pretty much a copy of Chuck Norris (U.S. accountant). —Pelozurian (talk) 09:11, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Eh, it's fine. --UU - natter 09:30, Jul 2
- Totally Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:31, 2 July 2010
- Strong keep. Yeah, this could be expanded, but this isn't bad really. -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 06:04 EST 2 July, 2010
- Keep. Spıke Ѧ 11:33 2-Jul-10
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Why do I get the impression that this is a vanity page? Loopygrumpkins 06:40, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Surely because you don't know that George Lucas is a (somebody)? Spıke Ѧ 11:33 2-Jul-10
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. It's stubby but it at least consistent and doesn't add in Nazis/Star Wars/etc etc - the standard rubbish accumulators. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:33, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks Romartus. You voting keep on this article made me lol excessively. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:46, 2 July 2010
|
Delete (5) |
- WHAT. THE. FUCK?! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:16, 2 July 2010
- Uh no I would like tosay keep, but nah--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 02:33, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. The opening quote amused me, but the rest was awful. Loopygrumpkins 05:39, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Confused by Romartus voting keep - this sucks. --UU - natter 09:21, Jul 2
- Delete. "It is believed to have been derived from the ancient Nowhereian word "Mramlont", which quite literally translates to "to be anally penetrated by yourself"." This single, gassy sentence breaks the encyclopedia canon in every possible way for no benefit. "Quite literally." Spıke Ѧ 11:05 2-Jul-10
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (8) |
- Keep. Horace Donald Westenchester is rewriting it, which is a good enough reason to keep it. —Pelozurian (talk) 04:46, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Per the rewriting. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:46, 1 July 2010
- Keep. Now the article is actually about Degaussing! Spıke Ѧ 13:00 1-Jul-10
- Change to keep The rewrite makes the article decent now. Saberwolf116 15:17, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. This is excellent! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 8:02 PM 7/1/10
- Keep. Horace! He's turning me into a fanboy. Alesiter 2:19 2 7 MMX
- Keep. I don't know what the article was like before the revision, but what I just read is excellent! Loopygrumpkins 06:30, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems fine. --UU - natter 09:19, Jul 2
|
Delete (4) |
Disintegrate. Nothing worth saving here. Saberwolf116 12:47, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. What Saberwolf said. I couldn't even understand half of it. --—John Lydon 16:16, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. The picture and caption were promising and made me hopeful, but the rest failed.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Wednesday, 07:18, June 30 2010 UTC
- Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:26, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Wasteing my breath--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:33, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Degaussing as an analogy to what the body does to imbibed alcohol is an interesting concept, if fleshed out, and with a better link to reality than the usual Irish stereotype. Otherwise, huff it. Spıke Ѧ 13:08 30-Jun-10
- Kept. 8-4. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 09:33, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. This article is awful, completely randumb, and the author should probably have his/her computer smashed so that he/she can never write anything ever again. It embarrasses me to admit this, but this may very well be the one of the funniest articles I've read all weak. I know that I should be voting to delete this, but I laughed through the entire article. To me, it's so stupid and pointless that it's hilarious. I think, that once-in-a-long-while, there should be a completely random, nonsensical article like this, just so that people can laugh at the stupidity of it. This doesn't mean that every nonsensical article should be kept, but just a few could be allowed to slide-by just to surprise people hitting the "random article" button. Loopygrumpkins 05:27, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- Obliterate. I was not amused. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:40, 2 July 2010
- Delete. What the hell is this even about?--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Friday, 02:41, July 02 2010 UTC
- Delete. I am bored with randumbo humour - which this is essentially. Lazy word disassociation games. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:31, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Per above. —Pelozurian (talk) 09:12, 2 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Naw, this is nothing. --UU - natter 09:25, Jul 2
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. Notice the Overly British tag, Americans may not understand the humour? Aleister 10:03 30 6 MMX
- Keep. Keepable stub. Here's a less crufty version. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:57, 30 June 2010
- Keep. Rewritten entirely; British tag (which nags the reader not to change anything) removed; lists removed, the couple good points included in the prose. Spıke Ѧ 11:54 30-Jun-10
- Keep...especially as I had to pay this damn charge only a few days ago...--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:12, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 07:50, July 2, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Ehh, not funny.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 09:55, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (6) |
- Probably the only person on this website, but I thought it was pretty good. Still agree with the against vote reasons though. --Matfen 21:15, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep No, I enjoyed it too when I saw it a long time ago. But it does need a helping hand, and I'll put in a few minutes--emphasis on a few. Aleister 21:18 24 6 MMX
- comment below, my appreciation of the page has actually grown after some editing.
- Keep.. It's bit randumbo in parts but I think it isn't atrocious enough for the in house shredder just yet. Perhaps Aleister can rescue it a bit more. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:13, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. Not VFD material. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:11, 25 June 2010
- Keep It's not featurable as is, but I hardly see why it should be here. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 13:22, June 25, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not very good, but not bad enough for deletion. —Pelozurian (talk) 23:34, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- It's just not funny, and very random--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 20:16, June 24, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Full of nonsense numbers and stupid namedropping. We don't really need an article on this, anyway...--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Thursday, 08:37, June 24 2010 UTC
- Delete. Apparently I don't have sufficient chemicals in-house to read this from "a certain point of view." It is extemporaneous rambling about a body part of a pop star (just up one notch over rambling about a made-up character), a vehicle for listcruft on the thesis that a celebrity is unattractive. It is unclever and unfunny, even when cleaned up. Spıke Ѧ 13:03 25-Jun-10
- I'll send over some of the chemicals. But you owe me, man, and I'll take a pinch off the top for the service charge. Aleister 14:55 26 6 MMX
- Delete. Listcruft and randomness. Sounds like a death metal song. --SadisticWolf 14:39, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Using this article as a repository for big forhead jokes would be an okay strategy, but the fasilure to gather thee needed big head jokes and the substitution of wibble a strike against it. --Count of Monkey Crisco 23:02, June 27, 2010 (UTC)
- delete. bah, this is terrible. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 06:33, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Did some careful edits. imnho the page is actually very good if read from a certain point of view. Even the numbers create a surrealistic atmosphere, and the page has some very clever lines and concepts. I mention in my edit captions that editing should be done very carefully, like a surgical operation, because of its balance, and that is the best way I can describe it. Aleister 21:39 24 6 MMX
- Six all after a week? That's a keeper. --UU - natter 09:39, Jul 1
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Smite. You have got to be kidding me--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 01:39, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Kill it, Iwillkillyou And kill it now, so I can watch. Aleister 2:09 1 7 MMX
- Delete. It didn't use the censor function enough. --Wilytank 02:34, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- This never existed. Move along. —Pelozurian (talk) 05:01, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- Delete.. Prunes. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:28, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- See my recent comments on "performance art" articles. A prude might be someone who likes censoring things; so this article censors things. I personally prefer funny writing to the crutch of using {{C}}, and especially overusing it; I thought it was trite in one section of Barack Obama and is triter here. But the article "does what it sets out to do." Subtle pokes would be better than heaps of scorn. Spıke Ѧ 04:00 1-Jul-10
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Anon whored this article in the See also of Soup, which I've been minding. The article does use the word "soup" three times in the intro, but otherwise seems like randumbo. If others know who Joel McHale is or what the joke is, and think it's clear from the article, I'll be happy to lose this vote. Spıke Ѧ 03:39 1-Jul-10
- Nah Could be better.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 03:42, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- As in a previous vote, "This article isn't the very best it could be" is not the right criterion. Do you believe it positively deserves deletion? Spıke Ѧ 03:44 1-Jul-10
- Well, it can always be recreated, but yeah it deserves a good deletion--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 03:45, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Okay then. Spıke Ѧ 03:48 1-Jul-10
- Delete.. I wrote this comment with the help of an elephant, a bowl of soup and Chuck Norris. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:21, July 1, 2010 (UTC)
- Delete. Random shite. --UU - natter 09:36, Jul 1
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. Works as a cute companion piece to UnBooks:Great Abridged Literature, for me. --UU - natter 09:02, Jun 30
- Keep. It could do with some more sections, but otherwise it's fine. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:26, 30 June 2010
- Keep. VFD is so unfair much of the time. Toss a page up, a few people may come by and delete it, and it's gone before most everyone else realizes it. Why not a 48 hour rule or something? This particular page is a good page, could be retitled as one of the 100 series. Aleister 10:08 30 6 MMX
- Barely This article certainly isn't great but the idea behind it shows enough promise to warrant it sticking around. The ICU would be a much better home for this. --—John Lydon 16:06, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
- Keep. I agree with everyone, except Al, mostly because he seems to be trying to stop me deleting whatever I like. --ChiefjusticeGameBoy 19:22, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Just not good enough, even for UnBook standards.--If you're 555 then I'm Talk What's it like to be a heretic? 07:38, June 30, 2010 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|