From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. This one... this... this just went too far. TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Didn't find it funny. It made me feel sorry for TKF though. Poor frogs. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Yup, a screen's worth of unfunny. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I'm not sure if the term "Frog Bashing" is another word for "racism", but that was what this article was from start to finish. First to the French, now to all of Africa. Conniving 13:25, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Bash -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 14:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete How very strange that the concept of the article changes three (count 'em, three) times. Not only that, but it uses run-on sentences which is bad (omg) and seems to lack basic grammar skills this thing deserves to die.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete--Sir Manforman 14:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
Keep -maybe i can do something with it MD H.LajosROAR 23:35, Thursday October 31 2024
|
Delete |
Nyamos usually live up to OVER 9000 years! Yeah, but where's the WOW factor? -- Le Cejak • <-> 01:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Well, "15 pages" is subjective. -- Le Cejak • <-> 01:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- If you'd checked the history, you'd have found it was ICUable, and I put the template back that was unjustly removed by the author. Secondly, 15 pages is 15 pages. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 01:05 Oct 07, 2007
- Oooh, it was made just this morning! I found it by looking at a template on QVFD. neevermiind... Le Cejak • <-> 01:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep Kinda useful. -- Le Cejak • <-> 00:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's used on over five hundred pages...whoever huffs it gets to change all those pages over to Spang's version, mentioned below. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 01:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep - I still think this has a purpose. Also, I do not particularly want to remove this from hundreds of pages. I don't think there is a good reason why this should be deleted. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 14:20, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Switched vote not nominating it anymore, sorry Cajek. Dossier 14:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Looks very useful. Conniving 16:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- WTF? Cajek, learn to use {{random colour}}. All your random color problems will magically be solved, and you won't need any more of these blasted templates. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 01:03 Oct 07, 2007
- Delete. A little unnecessary... is it just me, or does this Dossier guy seem to have it out for Cajek? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Per TKF. Maybe Dossier has prejudice for Cajek, but this template, just this one, must go--Sir Manforman 01:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Oh, I kinda use this a hell of a lot. Also, I already have reasons ON the damn template why this is better. Please don't delete it, guys. -- Le Cejak • <-> 01:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Nah. I read it. It's pointless. People don't care if a color's randomized through names or hexadecimal digits. Stick to Spang's template. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 01:10 Oct 07, 2007
- Okay, I need to edit a few things here and there... Le Cejak • <-> 01:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- I could save you the trouble. I've been itching for a good purge as of late. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- haha, go for it dude! Le Cejak • <-> 01:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, thank you Modus, but it's only a trick of the eye. The template is only used on other templates which are on lots of pages. ...I think... Le Cejak • <-> 01:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- uh, okay, I switched my vote... Le Cejak • <-> 14:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- I switched my vote too, I just now realize what I've been doing to Cajek. Dossier 14:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Looking at it again, maybe this IS a useful template. Dossier 20:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep Maybe Somehow I think this can't be VFDed as I think this may be a in joke. I'll ask Famine the creator of this article about it. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 00:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- I enjoy Flammable's large, cushy ass from time to time -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep on the grounds that this is the work of Famine. --General Insineratehymn 01:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think that should influence anyone's decision to keep an article. Conniving 20:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and heavily revise; project namespace. (Though if it is deleted, redirect it to Uncyclopedia:Administrators or whatever that page is.) —Hinoa talk.kun 02:18, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep (without merge) I think someone's just going to make this again either way. The first sentence got me, they slow down the site and stuff when they actually keep it moving (maybe they stop it from going so fast that it actually crashes). Of course, something like this would need the help of actual bureaucrats that can laugh at what they write about themselves. Conniving 20:30, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep As per TKF. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 22:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Just merge it with UN:ADMIN. OneCoolKid 20:58, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Conniving's rewrite saved the day--Sir Manforman 21:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's been rewrote...rewrotted...rewrotten...typed, so keep. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Sir OCdt Jedravent CUN UmP VFH PLS ACS WH 02:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. That conniving bastard has all but made this vote obsolete.--<<>> 14:19, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Damn you, Conniving, making me look foolish! I was going off of memory of the Bureaucrats page. Blast.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Wow, I could totally write an UnNews article on the above "Keep" vote(s). Conniving 15:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 17:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Good shout from Conniving. This has definitely left the VFD station. The Oblong Lobster 17:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Nom &
Delete. Crap. This is the type of crap I'd QVFD, but it would leave a nasty red link on the list of admins. They should get rid of the link on that page if it is deleted Sir Manforman 00:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, or, rather, redirect to The Bureaucracy Channel. That keeps the redlinks from buzzing around pesting admins. ----OEJ 00:43, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
Delete, as OEJ. What? Stop staring at me. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, send the content to Wiki Administrators or any other place it suits. No to Uncyclopedia:Administrators, it doesn't go with the poems.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 06:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
*Delete Tastes like chicken. The Oblong Lobster 02:51, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Well, TBC is a good dam' ardickle, Modus, and deserved the attention. We're not staring at you, we're staring with you. ----OEJ 01:12, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, praise from Caesar. That's like pennies from heaven, except that it's praise instead of pennies. Also Caesar instead of heaven. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 02:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I didn't realize Famine wrote this article. I still don't see the need for this to be kept, checking the history, and it's nearly a year old. Also, in the page history, Famine said uh, this page didn't exist. I feel guilty hitting save, this sucks so badly. But hockey is on, so I'm not 100% sure he would mind. Anyways, I'm not so sure what to think anymore--Sir Manforman 22:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I think the article could be improved with help from actual Uncyclopedia Bureaucrats. Any that are willing to take my interview would be great. I left a message on several of their talk pages. Conniving 18:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - You probably wouldn't need an interview with burea's, all they do is user rights, though it's a good thing you're rewriting--Sir Manforman 18:54, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment I know, it's not needed, but I just get the feeling i'm on to something with this. Conniving 18:56, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Comment. Looks like it's been expanded. All you "Deletes", reconsiderin' time! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, thank you. For a second, I feared Manforman was the only one watching the page. Conniving 21:50, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- I was wondering if anyone else noticed that. I'll go do that now. Conniving 01:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep, series. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:48, 05 Oct 2007
- Keep -- 00:44, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as per Spang. JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 02:09, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Since it's so short, having one thing that made me smile is sufficient. The line about Prince is gold, Jerry, gold!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:18, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, as it is part of a series. The Keyboard template does NOT deserve red links. Conniving 03:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete. short stupid non needed stubSir Manforman 23:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I suppose. Awfully short and silly. ----OEJ 00:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I know it's in a series, but if that series is to be kept, it should have some redeeming qualities, and I see none here. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I'm really lost with this series keep thing. This article is bad, there's no point looking further than that. The Oblong Lobster 02:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 17:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The problem with deleting articles which appear on a template -- like the keyboard template -- is that the reason for the template to exist gradually erodes. If the keyboard template is riddled with redlinks, it seems silly to have it at all. ----OEJ 00:50, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Having redlinks on such templates is a good way to get someone reading a similar article to notice it and have a go at writing it themselves (I count 2 or 3 redlinks on the keyboard template out of over 100). Deleting the template spoils the series, and the other option is to combine them all into one page, which would be rather messy for anyone trying to actually read it, though might appeal to those attempting to "un-clutter" the wiki. There isn't a lot of content on each individual page, but that's because it's really a whole series about the keyboard keys strung over 100 or so pages. Nobody's expecting a feature here. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:48, 05 Oct 2007
- IDEA - I don't know if it was mentioned but why don't you put them all on one page and redirect the others to a section of the page? -- 18:20, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- STRONG IDEA Let's listen to Ratmaster.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep. Someone tagged this article for deletion as part of Vigilante Week. Everyone I've shown it to thinks it's hilarious. Maybe I'm biased -- I am a music nerd and I wrote it -- but I say KEEP! The Realms of Gold 21:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Strong keep -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:11, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Uh... oh nevermind. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 22:13, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Bach<3 – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 22:14 Oct 05, 2007
- Keep -- 00:42, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and Speedy Close per above -- Don't need to say more as there was no nom amd delete reason. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 05:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep--Sir Manforman 21:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep!!!!!1! Don't you fools get it? It's an article written in the style of it's subject. Bleedin' brilliant.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, although it isn't my cup of tea. This is. Well, it's less of a cup than a can, and it's less tea than beer. But other than that it's exactly the same. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:13, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Umm, no delete votes? Who nommed this? By the way, it's not Vigilante Week. It's Vigilance week. JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 02:12, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete. More funny! More funny!... (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 5, 10:34
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:47, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. More random incoherence. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Badly flawed: any concept is buried in, as Under user notes, nonsense. ----OEJ 14:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:26, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Scrap -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:09, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 21:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete As per TKF and Insineratehymn. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 22:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It seems as if someone doesn't know their British colloquialisms!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:39, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Rap was easy to make, they took the C off of of crap, and this just increases the notice. -- 22:40, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete. Too much Chuck Norris, too little funny (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 5, 10:30
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Name-droppy rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Chuck Norris -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, redirect to Missing Lynx -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:36, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Lies! Utter lies! Axe (Lynx) does not make women want to have snu snu (?) with you. All it does is make my olfactory senses want to commit suicide every day. This article deserves death!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:35, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete. S'cuse me? (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 5, 10:27
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems to be an incoherent mess. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:03, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Huh? -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- LAZOR I'm sorry, but incredibly stupid puns pretending to be Star Wars names aren't funny. JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 02:25, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oh c'mon! Bye bye :) OneCoolKid 21:00, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Perhaps it's just me and my pesky "last lingering thread of sanity" but I think that incoherent doesn't begin to describe that garbage.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:33, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete. "In 1994 Rob Reiner tried to eat a castle." -- Mitch 10:26, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Yeah that pretty much sums it up... (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 5, 10:37
- Delete. Just really poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not much to see. ----OEJ 14:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Per Mitch. --AAA! (AAAA) 14:23, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - this work of genius is showing us all up --Asahatter (annoy) 16:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:49, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Feature -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- In 2007, Mitch 1 2 tried to eat "Rob Reiner"--Sir Manforman 17:25, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The page is dumb and short, but that "castle" line straddles the line bewteen madness and insanity. I'm stealing it and putting on my userpage. An egg this crazy will, no doubt, hatch someday. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:14, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Wow.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:30, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete. I doubt this has much future (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 5, 10:22
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, it's not up to much. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:58, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Who? When you have to ask yourself that question, and it's not funny, then there's a problem. And I doubt any amount of Wikipedia-ing will make this funny.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:29, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. Don't see what's wrong here. And don't forget to tag articles you put on VFD with the {{VFD}} template. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Big fat keep, in fact. This is funny. And the picture of the bears shooting a cannon at unicorns is great. (Whoops -- the bears probably appeared in Bears vs. Unicorns Conflict first, so it's...well, not plagiarism, but something.) ----OEJ 00:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Why hunt them, indeed.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 06:02, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I peed and enjoyed this. I see no reason at all this should be here. Did you read it at all? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:41, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:08, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep--Sir Manforman 17:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
- A guide for the rest of us Thank you guys. -- Le Cejak • <-> 00:57, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete Dossier 00:51, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- KEPT. you know... sign language for Unicorn looks a lot like you're calling someone a dickhead -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 01:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete Dossier 00:51, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete. Hidden F Series Page, nothing but a short stub with very few jokes. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- QVFD next time--Sir Manforman 23:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. "...all the keyboards that had them were impounded by an army of three eyed fish" is the epitome of randumb. ----OEJ 00:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. And this is rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Have Jason murder it. Get it? F13: Friday the Thirteenth? Oh, you people suck. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 21:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete As much a fan I am of mocking Ko<backwards R>n, this thing is, like, the epitome of bad. Worst F page I've seen ever.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:24, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. Sigh. Not very good, not very long, but has two good jokes in it: F8==fate and Unsafe Mode. Most of the keyboard series are short, and this one fits the (unfortunate) mold.----OEJ 00:48, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - LMAO, why in the world do you hate this one Manforman? --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 02:44, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, series. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:48, 05 Oct 2007
- Keep. This one isn't too bad. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:45, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It's an original concept, at least. Well, maybe not original in the sense of the term you've come to believe, but it's got the most potential of the Fs listed here.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:19, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
KEPT Restart to exit Safe Mode -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 01:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete. Sir Manforman 22:12, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Makes as much sense as the Bible The Oblong Lobster 22:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Unless improvement takes place. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:17, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, incoherent, poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:10, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- F7uckin' delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- LIl teech taht articull 2 call mee illiterate!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:17, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete. I don't know what language it is written in, but it is certaintly a language I don't understand. Also, it overusers the term F2 Sir Manforman 22:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Backspace The Oblong Lobster 22:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Alt+F4 This Too many red links and it doesn't make sense having a multilingual article here. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Absolute gibberish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:05, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oops, I put my vote in the wrong spot >_> Still delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:22, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It's quite poor. It's about the same gag as E, except E isn't as tripey as this.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- keep damnit* It's funny. They make fun of the lyrics. Knowig what the lyrics are helps the humor =__= Lord Gneo 05:11, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Killplzkthx. I can't believe I read all this. 75% of it is made-up lyrics about sucking cock, and the other 25% is name-dropping random nonsense. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:30 Oct 04, 2007
- Who? -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Burninate --General Insineratehymn 00:01, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I know the lyrics. I failed to laugh. This is a bad article. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:46, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Faggotry -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:24, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Kill the emo! P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 16:38, Oct 5
- Sugar, were going down. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 21:42, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete When I see those poorly-done parodies of Fall-Out Boy lyricism (or lack thereof), it saddens me. Such a good chance at parody, wasted.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 22:12, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom & Delete. I'm not entirely sure what to do about this one, even though it's a stub it has about one or two good stuff in there. Unless someone's offering to fix this article, I'll keep my vote. Narf, the Wonder Puppy/I support Global Warming and I'm 100% proud of it! 22:48, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Not good stuff. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It's not good and it's not good. The Oblong Lobster 22:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- QVFD--Sir Manforman 23:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- QVFD-- Per above, very sicking and not funny. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Underdeveloped. Has an idea, but fails to launch it. ----OEJ 00:52, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- To hell this gets deleted. IT'S MY ALL TIME FAVORITE ARTICLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 17:58, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. More random shenanigans. No funny that I could find. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Badly written, incoherent, and the image is terrible. ----OEJ 16:41, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Sorry Kip, this page... well, OEJ said it all. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Suggestions: what is "breg", if not a misspelling of bread? And "breg force 13" is, as far as this reader is concerned, completely undefined. The problem with using undefined made-up things is that the reader sees them as nonsense...that's why I characterized MWJ as incoherent. It does not make sense even internally. "It lead to the discovery of the magical land of Winkle and its various subordinate clauses" is ungrammatical and needs fixed. The image...geez. It's embarrassing. At least someone should photoshop a finger and some sort of monster instead of using a really poor-quality paint-mash. ----OEJ 19:07, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted. And moved to User:Kip the Dip/Magic Winkle Juice for Kip's pleasure. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:34, 05 Oct 2007
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Oh god, it mentions the subject of one of my all-time worst articles...and doesn't even link to it. The shame, the burning shame...oh, wait, that burning is just herpes. Never mind. ----OEJ 00:39, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:34, 05 Oct 2007
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Unless I missed something, and I don't think I have, this is random rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 14:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Cliché fanboi cruft: a sludge-metal musician touted as "creator of the heavens" as usual. Somebody likes a band member; fine, but not a rationale for an article. ----OEJ 14:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:06, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. I can't tell if this is vanity or parody, but either way it's unformatted and unreadable shit. TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:08, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Need paragraphs, consistent tense (some is in past tense, some in present tense), and some sort of reason for being. ----OEJ 14:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. If it is parody, it's very subtle. Basically, it's a mess, and all but unreadable. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Strong Keep. Since when was having one or two red links a reason to delete? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep for historical significance. --General Insineratehymn 00:55, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Err, you may not have noticed this, but this is actually a pretty good article. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Yeah, this is quite funny. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Good article. Excellent example of creative idiocy in the service of parody. ----OEJ 15:01, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Another great nomination The Oblong Lobster 20:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:21, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Fairly good parody of vanity kruft. --THE 21:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Comment - that and the POV the article is written on, it's a vanity like POV, bad--Sir Manforman 00:09, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Because it was featured, that's why. While other articles may be total vanitycruft, this one just doesn't do it for me. --Sir Manforman 00:32, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - If it is kept, it should be renamed (i.e. Visiting Uncle Frank in Delaware) and there should be an actual article on the state --Sir Manforman 00:59, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - If someone writes a better article on the state, I'd be happy with that. However, the title should stay the same for now. It's a tradition that we have some non-uncyclopedic articles. Uncyclopedia would be very boring without them. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:20, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Agree with Cs1987 in this case. Traditional encyclopedia POV is objective, neutral, and conservatively voiced. A parodic inversion might be subjective, first-person, and peculiarly voiced. You can look at the article to hand that way: as a satirical inversion of all that traditional encyclopedia stylists would hold dear. Or you can look at it as a cheerful romp. Either way it's not bad. ----OEJ 16:36, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:29, 05 Oct 2007
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Whoops, went over the rule limit. I'd remove it myself if I was allowed to, so I just removed the vote--Sir Manforman 23:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- I reinstated your vote and refrained from banning you. I might not be so nice next time, though. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 00:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yer such a boob M4M! But every boob needs time to grow. Le Cejak • <-> 00:52, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks Cs1987--Sir Manforman 21:01, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- They deserve better than this. I'm V-tagging it, and fully intend to put some spadework in to help it out. It won't end up a masterpiece, but hopefully I can make it acceptable. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:34, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Kept, adopted. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:51, 05 Oct 2007
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Uncertain vote - U-shirt is a lot worse than this article, so I'm tagging that with {{V}}. Consider merging T-shirt to Shirt. Pentium5dot1 04:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Agrees with the merge. 02:11, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:27, 05 Oct 2007
|
Keep |
- Must Keep - A four year old's reference to tell on the five year old that said "I go to Uncyclopedia" because it is definitely only for 6 year olds and up! -- 00:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete - Good idea, poor execution (Bonner) (Talk) Oct 2, 15:56
- Huff EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 16:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:42, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete this SUGARTITS -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 19:45, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Shit --General Insineratehymn 22:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:42, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Load of crap. Elassint 19:20, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Buy chicken soup first. 02:05, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
{{Icare}}
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Erm, it's used in user talk pages. What shall we do, subst: it if it gets deleted? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 21:07 Oct 02, 2007
- Probable renaming, Since it's not really an article template. 02:03, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- What? - Read the article and tell me it should be deleted... -- 00:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Barleywood indeed! This is not a bad article for the most part; it is well-developed, and "after years of being mocked and ignored" Kansas deserves it. ----OEJ 12:21, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, though that sure is one intimidating infobox. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:22, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:54, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- It's relevant, nonrandom and funny in some parts. Plus, the people who voted to delete this are all users who very rarely vote keep, and not one of them gave a reason why it should be deleted. No way in hell am I going to delete this. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Don't Kill! - It has facts, but not ones approved by the English professionals. KEEP! -- 23:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Fuck you -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 13:33, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete - Page is too factual, doesn't seem funny, and doesn't seem to fit here. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:13, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I support deletion, but consider a redirect to Fuck. There is nothing worth merging. Pentium5dot1 00:17, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- No, fuck you! --General Insineratehymn 01:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Feck this -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:18, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- NO, U – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 02:43 Oct 02, 2007
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Fuck me. No, wait... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:09, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Huff per Pentium5dot1 EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 16:20, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:03, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. this article displeases me. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 20:25, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- I would have QVFDed as stupid. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 22:09, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Quite possibly the least connected article of all time. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:20, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Gibberish --General Insineratehymn 01:54, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random drivel. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:46, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:58, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Payumicalisationalhuff -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 13:37, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Step 1: Win!
- Step 2: Profit!
- Step 3: Gay person bites you
- RAHB 16:54, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- No I like it and if it got deleted, it'd probably end up vandalism... Again?--General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 18:21, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- FAAAAAABULOUS! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:47, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Over my dead body. --General Insineratehymn 20:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- FEATURE I mean, keep. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:29 Oct 01, 2007
- Keep. Because. --THE 22:37, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- FOR -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:53, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Feature Best 3 line article ever --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:12, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Meh. I don't like this, but as usual I have to vote keep because it is very popular. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Welcome to How To Create An Uncyclopedia In-Joke!
- Step 1: Ridiculous page is made - Check
- Step 2: Survives QVFD - Check
- Step 3: People love it, gets cult following - Check
- Step 4: Page is put up for VFH, fails - Check
- Step 6: Page is place on VFD, survives - Half-Check
- Step 7: ???
- Step 8: Profit
- -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 16:02, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Kill - we already have Fisher Price, Euroipods and The word parakeet written exactly two hundred and forty-two times, how many dumb pages do we need?--Sir Manforman 20:59, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete A pathetic shade of patheric. The Oblong Lobster 21:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is not as funny as the other in-jokes, although I admit I'm really not that experienced as an Uncyclopedian. Can anyone think of a merge or redirect target? Pentium5dot1 21:34, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Can you tell me what the point of this article is? There isn't much content. (Or was it already deleted and someone brought it back?) -- 23:16, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep - Hasn't changed since it was saved from deletion last time. The Oblong Lobster 20:11, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep - Why get rid of the states? There is some humor. (British Translation: There is humour to a slight degree.) -- 19:16, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
*Strong Keep - WTH this is funny why delete it. Are you tring to delete all states, If you are I dare you to go after Kansas --Pleb- Sawblade5 [block me!] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 23:38, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|