From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - this article was written by Cheeseboy, an infi-banned user, and it would not be able to get it's proper help--Sir Manforman 12:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It is not good, nor is it funny. While this could be turned around, the author has been infi-banned for a month and thus it wouldn't be able to improve--Sir Manforman 20:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete Not funny and possible vanity -- (Bonner) (Talk) 10:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Could ICU again, but it probably would be removed again. Unfunny listy cruft. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 01:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 01:54, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. i fixed the links a few days ago, but i didn't VFD it because i wasn't sure if it was terrible or i just didn't get it. seeing this here confirms that i am probably not an idiot. maybe. --SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 21:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete - Unfunny stub -- (Bonner) (Talk) 12:52, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short and ugly, and what content there is seems uninteresting. ----OEJ 13:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Headline text --Roman Dog Bird 15:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Article's short, article's not funny, article should be deleted. --R. Daneel Olivaw (Gaia - Foundation) 18:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Headline text -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:22, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Euroipods--Sir Manforman 01:10, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. A complete waste of time. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 21:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 21:53, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete - I think it's utter crap -- (Bonner) (Talk) 12:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 15:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Would be okay if the title explained the randomness, but it doesn't. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:16, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Well, I had a look at the Wikipedia link and agree with the initial point, but this article is random and dumb. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 21:27, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:44, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
*Week Keap On the grounds of the many red links throughout the site that may lead to vandalism. We can delete after the rewrite. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 22:51, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete, I've attempted a rewrite, and it's not getting any better. It is very listy. There is some humor behind the rough list however, but most of it is jokes about how fat your mother is.--Sir Manforman 22:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yo' momma's so listy, her article got huffed. Listy. Awful. Needs a rewrite, but in the meantime, kill, redirect to something, and protect the redirect to prevent vandalism. When somebody's got a rewrite they're happy with, then it can be moved in place later on. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 22:02 Aug 29, 2007
- Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 00:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 00:35, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Based on the quality of the article. The Oblong Lobster 21:51, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:38, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kip, a red link is not a good reason to delete. Why not redirect to Your Dad, which is not awful, and than protect the redirect. My rewrite I was working on, just won't work, and a better writer needs to handle it. --Sir Manforman 23:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- I will change my vote if you promise to fix the double redirects after deletion. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 23:21, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Promise--Sir Manforman 23:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
I am rewriting this for UN:CW. P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:56, Sep 3, 2007
- Kept. MadMax 00:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep - I do tend to like articles that personify non-living objects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:36, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep What's up with all the bus hating at the moment? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 14:23, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. "ie" & redlinks notwistanding, it's not crap. Also, Canada is a speed-bumpless haven. They have pot holes instead. With real pot, too. I've said too much. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:43, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep If you can't laugh at buses swearing...then...ehhh...dunno. The Oblong Lobster 17:50, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:28, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete--Sir Manforman 22:33, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. If nothing else, the use of <sic> in the article is wrong, bad, and obnoxious. He/she/it/they mean ie, of course, but even the correct interjections are not needed. ----OEJ 00:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 00:37, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not funny...and seems to be based on the one picture -- (Bonner) (Talk) 17:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Oh yeah, you're right. Sorry about that. ----OEJ 00:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Why does Sbu vote to keep every single article on VFD?--Sir Manforman 14:26, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Her heart is filled with love and joy. It's true. My heart, meanwhile, is several sizes too small. That's how it's supposed to be, dammit. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. MadMax 00:41, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep - It's short but is a concept piece. Obviously, its concept doesn't please this month's delete voters, but oh well. --Ogopogo 03:59, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - 'Tis an interesting concept. I've changed my mind, this doesn't really need expansion. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:12, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep Short but kind of chuckly. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:10, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't know much about art. That's all; I really don't. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:06, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
That's it. I'm getting fed up with this 200Xcruft shit. Therefore, I will personally invalidate any further votes giving that as a reason. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)18:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Why? People have to read the article to vote on it, and they can see for themselves how bad it is. -- Mitch 01:56, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, but that doesn't give an excuse for people to use "200Xcruft" as a deletion reason. Not giving a reason at all is better that saying 200Xcruft, because 200Xcruft does not say anything about what exactly is wrong with the article. Also, there are many genuine 200Xcruft pages that will not get deleted, which again implies that 200Xcruft is not a sufficient reason for deletion. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:25, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
Dexter ... Looks like you forgot something. As the rules say: "Add vfd to the article in question. Failure to do so may invalidate the vote." --Ogopogo 21:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sorted that out for you -- (Bonner) (Talk) 13:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep, surprisingly. I think y'all are being too picky. It is an interesting idea, and it doesn't rely on memes. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:16, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Late last week, I fell out of bed and bonked my head. Well, I was pushed, actually. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:41, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and link into the Uncyc timeline somehow. Don't see anything wrong with it. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 15:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep' Nothing's wrong --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 18:01, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and remember the {{VFD}} tag, Dexter! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:14, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Very odd, but there is a silent beauty.The Oblong Lobster 21:48, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep If an article is good, it is good. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Doesn't really matter what people put as the reason...read it and decide. The Oblong Lobster 21:52, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. MadMax 00:33, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
*Keep - If this article to be deleted, might as well delete all the other article about races or religion.--Mikididi 17:20, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Conditional Keep - If the article doesn't get any funnier sometime soon, might as well delete it. --Omb 18:35, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
*Keep - This article is should be keep for re-editing --matrempit 18:41, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Humourous racism...without the humour. -- Mitch 01:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Urk. Delete + CVP. This article will never go in the right direction. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:40, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- I am the real Megatron! --Roman Dog Bird 01:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Racist, random and crap in most other respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:50, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed with TKF. CVP as well -- (Bonner) (Talk) 13:28, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete There has been very little progress int he right direction since VFD tagging. The above "keep" votes are by people who have not helped the article fix its problem in any way.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 13:43, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Sannse made the point that this sounds like a lot of vitriolic, anti-national rhetoric. Discuss. --Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 23:44, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- The less said about the drama going on at talk page the better. MadMax 23:58, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- I knew this will come sooner or later. I already told them to keep it funny and not just utterly disgusting. I honestly admit that while some parts are funny, most of them are not. --Omb 08:24, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Poorly written and lots of rancorous remarks. Either rewrite the entire article or delete it. --Mircohard 04:21, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
- CLOSED It's abundantly clear that this page isn't going anywhere good. Delete, CVP'd until a time where a [i]good[/i] article can be made.--Sir Flammable KUN (Na Naaaaa...) 13:57, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep, as its creator. If this gets the axe, I'd like it put back into my userspace -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- ADDITIONALLY: I don't see why people make such a huge hubub about "AAAAAAAA!" clones, when in reality, we only have a very small handful of them on the site. At least mine is different from the others, too (thanks in part to the Doc) -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 14:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- I fucking love it --Roman Dog Bird 18:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- PARTY HARD!!! --Dexter111344 23:07, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- KEEP If you can't PARTY HARD what can you do? Literally, what is there left to throw your dirty soul against? Come on!! The Oblong Lobster 21:28, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, purely for the use of random colours. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 12:07, 30 Aug 2007
- Well, I'm a big fan. Stole your random colours and your timestamp sig bits. Sorry. Someday I promise to make it up to you. Maybe I'll give you half my soul or something. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 00:26 Aug 30, 2007
- PARTY HARD --PARTYHARD 00:12, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- :O Keep! I think its fantastic -- (Bonner) (Talk) 14:03, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 14:30, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- PARTY HARDER!!! PARTY HARD!! Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
|
Delete |
- PARTY NOT Another article that repeats the same thing over and over. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 01:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Move to userspace Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Needs more than one joke. ----OEJ 23:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Clone of AAAAAAAAAA!! --Nordamus (blab • crap) 03:25, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Repetition can be used for comedic effect, but it must be used with other techniques, or it just gets repetitive. In other words, it just gets repetitive. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:38, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:42, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I was bored of all my WiPs and felt like mainspacing an article for once >_> So sue me! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:05, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Fine. I'm sure having a username proclaiming your murderous and green tendencies won't look good to the judge. I don't care if it ain't easy bein' green. My lawyers will have a field day with you. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 02:55 Aug 27, 2007
- Don't pretend you can outmaneuver me in court! I've scrutinizingly memorized every line in Pink Floyd's The Trial, I'm legally invincible! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:39, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- The problem with "prose" that just repeats itself over and over is...there is one joke, and that's the repetition. AAAAAA's joke is repetition. I look at the page, I scroll down and see it's all the same thing...and I just click off to another article. Repetition is so fucking fucking fucking repetitive it doesn't even rate a slight smile anymore. Not interesting. Not even slightly interesting. ----OEJ 23:03, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. MadMax 01:24, 3 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete --Sir Manforman 21:43, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 22:28, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Dirty Potter -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 22:50, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, picless, and it has Optimus Prime in it. (BAD!) ----OEJ 00:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Totally not funny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:30, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Per OEJ. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:32, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. --Norwegian Blue 17:52, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, idea's not funny to being with. --Narf, the Wonder Puppy/I support Global Warming and I'm 100% proud of it! 23:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Old stub --General Insineratehymn 21:22, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 21:34, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- 1928cruft -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 22:54, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, picless, and uninteresting. ----OEJ 23:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, ditto on OEJ's comment. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:17, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete One of the oldest pages. Not that funny. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 01:45, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I my change my vote if it is expanded. As it stands nearly every possible joke suggested by the subject is avoided in favor of a two short paragraphs of maundering and a bad Norris. ----OEJ 12:16, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Let there be huffing. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:50, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 18:06, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - It could be expanded, but I doubt that it will be within the next week. At the moment it is far too short and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:18, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Not that funny and really short. --R. Daneel Olivaw (Gaia - Foundation) 21:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment The Chuck Norris thing wasn't so bad when this was first written. You must realize that back in 2005 and early 2006 the Chuck Norris jokes were still fresh. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
- Yeah, like any meme it's funny at first...or it wouldn't have made it to memehood. But at this point we ought to go through and cut out all the irrelevant Norris references. The meme is stale. ----OEJ 23:10, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep. Are you not on the internets? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- PENISPENISPENIS -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
- Weak keep - This isn't very funny, but it has the potential to be a good satire. Perhaps we should rewrite tag it. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Changed to Strong Keep per my new paragraph. :) Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 08:57, 27 Aug 2007
- Flaccid keep. I've never encountered this - the internets, you say? I'll give them a try. Can you get them on slide-rules these days? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Very weak keep --Roman Dog Bird 18:11, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- CockCockCock -RAHB 05:30, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Personally, I thought it was pretty funny. -- Hanyouman 08:01, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep penispenisenis. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 18:02, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- I added another paragraph, just to give you all an idea of the satirical angle I was thinking about. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:09, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kept. MadMax 10:21, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete She was a wrestler, but this somehow only has stupid-ass, made up DBZ jokes. But... DBZ was actually good, unlike this. --Dexter111344 00:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Wrestling articles never fail to disappoint. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 13:15, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Per Mickey. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 18:13, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 00:09, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Make damn well sure you VFD-tag something before you nominate it here. Otherwise, I'm not going to delete it.—RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)13:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete Unfunny and I can't see anyone wanting to make it better -- (Bonner) (Talk) 19:05, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 01:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:00, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Really poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:25, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 18:22, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Just the usual stupidity: "...raping neighborhood cats and children...". I put on the VFD template, Bonner can send me a virtual beer sometime. ----OEJ 00:38, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- Dere-lick -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:25, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Make damn well sure you VFD-tag something before you nominate it here. Otherwise, I'm not going to delete it.—RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)13:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- Gahh sorry about that :( I should really pay more attention to what i'm doing. /me sends OEJ a virtual beer -- (Bonner) (Talk) 14:04, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete, Red links, no pics, old, and short--Sir Manforman 21:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 06:09, August 24, 2007
- Weak delete. MadMax has sorted out most of the red links, and there are some OK ideas in there, but I can't see anyone being bothered to make much of them, and it's not strong enough as it is. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:05, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 18:33, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep Could probably use a tidy, but there's some of Ye Olde Humoure in there. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:31, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep Not that bad. Sir Roger 07:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per SbU. --Dexter111344 19:16, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ye olde keep. ~ 20:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Not too bad, plus it actually has a Snakes on a Plane joke that isn't completely stupid and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - --Ogopogo 06:29, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Article kept. 12:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - If the ICU on this gets removed one more time I might just have to kill myself. If we do not get rid of this now, the ICU will probably be removed again. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:54, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:51, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. For the health and well being of Cs. And 'cos it sucks. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:55, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 18:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete because its more boring than your high school history teacher. Nwwaew 21:12, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, though the actual animal is quite Ballin -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:05, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Executed; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)13:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I figure I should let you people vote a bit before I delete this tripe. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:34, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Dexter111344 19:36, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Sigh... another sad case of "bad article, great game". -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:55, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Man, it's a good job it's a nice sunny day, or crap like this would really kill my mood. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:27, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Roman Dog Bird 18:20, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Executed; voting closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)13:19, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete - More crap, 'nuff said -- (Bonner) (Talk) 19:02, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:24, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Yet, another old stub--Sir Manforman 21:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Nordamus (blab • crap) 02:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 06:09, August 24, 2007
- Delete. Poor stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:00, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Just plain stupid. --Dexter111344 19:28, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Cute kitty, but it belongs at home and not on Uncyc. Methinks 'tis PetVanity. ----OEJ 12:18, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Per the Lounge request, towncruft as well--Sir Manforman 21:23, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - Some of it is good, but as a whole it's a pretty crappy towncruft article. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:48, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 06:09, August 24, 2007
- Delete. And again. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:57, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Haha idiotic sex jokes. --Dexter111344 19:18, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- The 18th oldest page that is short and dumb--Sir Manforman 21:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC).
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:52, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 23:24, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- 2002cruft -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
- Delete - Unfunny stub. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:53, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- 1872cruft -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:09, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 06:09, August 24, 2007
- Delete. Poor stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:51, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - but it will no longer show up on the oldest pages list because you've just added the vfd template. Sir Roger 07:33, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Unfunny Stub about a make-believe person. Should have been VFD'd a long time ago. User:Randomjunk52/sig 07:12, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- 3000 B.C.cruft--Scott 10:26, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ----OEJ 12:20, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep --Dexter111344 23:07, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Yeah, it's random, but it's also kinda funny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 01:50, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I either love it or I hate it. I'm still not quite sure which - when I skim read it it looked awful, then I read it all and thought it was great, and now I'm just confused. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:35, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Sir Roger 07:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep The guy in the song sounds creepy. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 21:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Awesome He sounds so fucked up. --Dexter111344 23:42, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep UnTunes is a bit different to mainspace on stubs. Kinda like UnPoetia (which could do with its own namespace too methinks). I think this is pretty normal for UnTunes! -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:04, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Twisted. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:11, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It sounds like Violent Femmes, acapella. Also, I've got big hands, and I know I'm the one, apparently. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:25, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- tag with re-write Sir Roger 06:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep "It also has an interesting property which makes you YELL the next word you say afterwords. It is unfortunately underused on the Internet." -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't get it, why is Manforman trying to rape that Alphabet template? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 13:22, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I don't feel write deleting this while keeping the rest. Also, it's been on VFD for about 3 days without anyone bother putting the VFD template up, which kind of makes it ineligible... --Dexter111344 19:25, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete--Sir Manforman 20:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:47, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Now, this is a poor keyboard article. ----OEJ 01:56, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete This is the only one that is SHIfT out of the keyboard articles you put up here. --Dexter111344 02:04, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I was going to say keep because it would be the only red link on the keyboard. Then I noticed > is already red. So it will have company. Shift out of luck. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 06:09, August 24, 2007
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 20:44, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- You can't strike out votes Dexter, you're not a Sysop--Sir Manforman 19:30, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
- It was my vote... I'm changing it. Don't tell me I can't change my own vote. --Dexter111344 06:39, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete--Sir Manforman 20:46, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:46, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Similar situation to this author's article on Saddam's teddy...odd links. Probably random. Dunno. ----OEJ 02:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Lacks any actual content or at least, sensible and funny content... --Dexter111344 02:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 06:09, August 24, 2007
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep --Dexter111344 21:29, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep Tickled me and would have been amusing at the time (and UnNews should be allowed to get dated surely?) -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- It's one line, and in severeal attemps to QVFD it, it failed because it was to old, I don't see satire and think it should be deleted--Sir Manforman 20:35, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ho ho huff -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
- Delete. Not much to read, and nothing to see. ----OEJ 01:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Joke should be incorporated into a real article. Sir Roger 05:43, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - One liner. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:46, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Stub. Not funny. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:55, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 06:09, August 24, 2007
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 05:20, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. Yes, it's schoolcruft. This page (of schoolcruft), however, has some merit. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:24, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- There is no cabal... --Dexter111344 02:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep One of the better schooly ones, in that I understand what it's going on about and laughed. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- I keep suspecting there is a small cabal involved in writing articles around and about Pontypridd. A small cabal of students who like the Ponty pubs. But they are too clever for me to figure out their IPs and whatnot. Or, rather, I am too stupid and lazy to put any effort into it. ----OEJ 01:55, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep Sir Roger 18:40, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Mentions Mothra. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:20, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- I like the idea, but someone should expand it(but not me). --Dexter111344 20:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- i guess we have to keep this -- for now. Sir Roger 06:15, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- The second quote makes it worth keeping." It leally does. Tag with expand. --Dexter111344 22:14, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Good enough despite length. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep better to expand these keyboard articles than start again with new stubs. They will eventually be reasonable collaborative efforts. And I ate lice every day in Japan. Sir Roger 06:12, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per everyone. Enough letters now please Manforman? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:26, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It has enough redeeming qualities and potential. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Maybe I'm on a letter rampage tonight, but it sucks--Sir Manforman 22:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Slaughter Sucks bad. If it were a trifle shorter, I'd ICU it if it were < 1 week. --Nordamus (blab • crap) 02:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I do not think that a Quote "L" Makes an article worth keeping--Sir Manforman 22:16, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete, based on the following criteria:
- It's a blatant copyright violation of GFDL
- It fails UN:DUMB
- Most of the information in it is true.
- It's feeding the trolls
- It will no longer be parody if the Wikipedia version of Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense is deleted.
- If you want to keep it, at least delete the subpages and tag the page as {{Historical}}--Sir Manforman 21:06, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Since when did we care about copyright violations? I don't believe this is a copyright violation anyway.
- Err...no it doesn't. Wikipedia is based on factual articles. This isn't an article, and it isn't particularly factual either.
- Most of the information on all Uncyclopedia articles is false.
- I don't believe it's feeding trolls.
- BJAODN will be remembered long after it is deleted. If it is deleted, it won't render TFAODP obsolete. That's like saying we can't write articles about Hitler because he's dead.
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:03, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Ah Cs1987, this is a joke nomination based on this. Yes, Nobody Cares if it's a copyright violation, but reading the Wikipedia discussion, everybody is talking about that. That was a flaw when I said most of it was false, I meant was true. Also, this may not fail UN:NOT, it fails UN:DUMB. The rest, is your opinion, which I encourage you to have, but how would this be a parody if it was deleted at Wikipedia? --Sir Manforman 13:11, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Kp I lik this. Th ltter in qustion is alrady dltd, which is why it is so funny. Sriously. --Dexter111344 01:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kp - Not too bad. Keyboard pages should only be deleted if they are really crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:49, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Really makes me appreciate the letter E. Think of people in poor nations such as Bosnia and China that have none. Sir Roger 06:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kp pr vryon ls. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It's not too bad, and links well to lipogram, which fits with it (but is much better). --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:21, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kp, aftr sing Dxter 111344 and Dr. Skullthumpr do work, I gt th jok now. --Sir Manforman 13:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Delete--Sir Manforman 20:54, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Gee Manforman, you're sure mad at letters today. But in this case I'll have to agree with you. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:46, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- To many red links, and not enough satire.--Sir Manforman 20:37, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I wonder how the author chose the external links. They're to personal websites. Odd. ----OEJ 02:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Yeah... vanity/advertising and talking crap about Saddam's teddy. --Dexter111344 02:10, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Crikey, SBU's feeling generous today. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I think Strange but untrue is feeling very nice today, voting to keep everything.--Sir Manforman 13:13, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Old--Sir Manforman 20:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- 2002cruft -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
- 2002cruft, Kip? There's no such thing... And let's not use "Old" as a reason. It implies all old things are bad and need deletion(which is wrong). It is that fact that this is/never was funny, and the author(more than likely) wasn't even trying. I almost voted keep just to spite you two. --Dexter111344 21:27, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:33, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Without worth. ----OEJ 01:58, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- 1977cruft - just like every other media reference to Elvis. Sir Roger 05:45, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This one's more like it. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:44, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Thoroughly deserving. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:05, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I was kidding around with the "2002cruft". Oldies aren't necessarily bad, just the stubbies with few edits. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
|
Keep |
- Comment if you look at the discussion, everyone who participated wanted it deleted, yet it remains, and someone was too lazy to delete it apparently, because I see no logs of it being deleted, and/or hacked up by STM. ~
Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 23/08/2007 @ 16:08
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- sigh OK, I give in. I've looked at the Euroipods talk page. Euroipods was the greatest controversy that wasn't, sorta funny because it was the least funny featured article in history. But still, I'm not going to vote to keep either. ...and I'm not afraid of Savethemooses. Well, only a little. Sir Roger 05:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom And Delete - More unfunny crap with too many pointless sexual references -- (Bonner) (Talk) 16:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yich! Sir Roger 18:44, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Desperate -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- <sarcasm>"Oooo. Look! I wrote a page on how much a band, or person in a band, sucks! No one but me could ever thing of such a thing. I'm so special!"</sarcasm> Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 00:28, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:32, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Dexter111344 01:16, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Hatecruft does not equal intelligent satire. Or satire at all, for that matter. And this is hatecruft. ----OEJ 01:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. My Chemical Penis. How amusing. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:42, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Ranty ranty rant rant. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:46, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete - Unused image -- (Bonner) (Talk) 15:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kill EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 15:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Everytime I see that guy it enrages me. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •
- Delete Sir Roger 18:39, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Desolate -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:57, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Unused. Once, I replaced his pic with one of Mickey Rooney. True story. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Olipro uploaded it so it must be bad, and possibly wasted, too. --Dexter111344 20:05, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 00:31, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete but please no more images on VFD just because they're unused - you'll fill the place up. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 08:35, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 16:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- This is even worse than what's on the mirror site. --Dexter111344 16:34, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Aye. ~ 16:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Kick -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 17:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Terrible. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 19:32, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- AGAIN? --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 19:36, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to CVP Sir Roger 07:38, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- CVP. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:51, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'm pretty sure this is a re-created page. I know I saw it on here before I got a chance to see what was actually on the page, but if it's the same material that got it deleted in the first place, well......... Roman Dog Bird 16:20, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Got deleted in the past. Thrice. ~ 16:57, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Four deletions doesn't seem to warrant a CVP in this case. Someone is always gonna wanna make this. Therefore, all of you chaps should get together and make a good version of this page before the vultures come back. Or get Ljlego to do it. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 16:00, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep because it's so soft and furry! And because it's used on certain animal articles. Sir Roger 07:32, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft and randomcruft --Dexter111344 15:05, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 16:24, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 23:58, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Random and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Roger 07:47, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Just occasionally, I wonder if the people who write this kind of random drivel actually find it funny, and expect others to. Then my thousand yard stare kicks in. Delete. What's next? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Really stupid 2005cruft. Most of the article is random crap completely unrelated to him, espicially the Super Friends. Delete. --Dexter111344 14:40, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 16:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - unfunny crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:19, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Yawn Sir Roger 07:48, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:15, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as nominator. Randumbcruft on some non-notable athlete/cheerleader. Pentium5dot1 04:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Random and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:29, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a bad footballer (soccerist), but a bad article. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:54, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. --Dexter111344 14:25, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. He's definitely notable, but this article is awful. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 15:26, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. That's the worst starting "sentence" I've ever seen. Ever. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:35, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 16:27, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:30, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Bad. -- Mitch 04:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Random and unfunny. Should have been deleted when NRVed. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:30, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Starts random and ranty, descents into list hell. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:52, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Emo band crap with some randomcruft and name-dropping. Why not CVP and protect it from being created ever again? I hate emo stuff. HATE HATE HAT!!! --Dexter111344 14:00, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Despite the fact that Dexter called Avenged Fucking Sevenfold emo and I was tempted to vote Keep just to spite him, this article just isn't good enough to merit that. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:01, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Meh, they may not be emo. They still suck. I was thinking of some other band. I think I had been thinking of Angels and Airwaves... --Dexter111344 15:45, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep - Don't be ridiculous, Gerry Adams is hardly an obscure nobody who shouldn't have an entry. Remove the "delete" and replace it with a hard rewrite. --Zarbag 08:06, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Has the odd funny bit, if a little random, and as a bonus manages to be relatively inoffensive, something I don't imagine we'll see on the next thousand rewrites of this article. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 10:33, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Dexter111344 17:06, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete - another one that seems to have been VFD'd then put back up again. Some edits since then, but still awful. Sir Roger 00:11, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 00:16, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, though that DYK about him is damn funny. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:48, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:08, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Not funny. The Oblong Lobster 17:45, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|