From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Uncyclopedia Puzzle Potato Notext.png
There is an alternate version of this article at Vandalism.
Seen here is a highly valuble and quite rare photo of Sophia untouched by vand...damn it...not again.

Vandalism is any addition, deletion, or change to content made in a deliberate attempt to reduce the quality of the encyclopedia. The most common type of vandalism is the replacement of existing text with obscenities, page blanking, or the insertion of meta-jokes or other nonsense. Fortunately, this kind of vandalism Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Apparent bad-faith edits that do not make their bad-faith nature inarguably explicit are not considered vandalism at Wikipedia. For example, adding an opinion once is not vandalism — it's just not helpful, and should be removed or restated.

Committing vandalism is a violation of the Wikipedia policy; it needs to be spotted, and then dealt harshly with — attractive female users are encouraged to report and revert any vandalism they see.

Early Vandals

The first Vandals were a tribe of destructive Germans active in the 5th century. Unable to log on to the Roman Empire, these vandals took out that frustration by breaking a lot of things and other people's passwords in the age of the slave powered abacus. The Christian Church Network (CCN) reported on these particular Vandals and eventually got them banned permanently in the 6th century when their home base in North Africa was closed down.


Wiki Vandalism

Wiki vandalism is generally defined as editing a wiki in a way that is intentionally disruptive or destructive. There are four generally acknowledged types of vandalism: deletion of legitimate information, insertion of noncents or irrelevant content, addition of unwanted commercial links (spam), and policy violations specific to that wiki.

Spotting Vandalism

It's arguable that most (identified) vandalism has consisted of really quite obvious cases. Hence, Wikipedia doesn't need to define an "official" policy on what constitutes vandalism at all. We can use the rule of thumb, "When a reasonable person might be in doubt as to whether something is vandalism, it would be polite not to call it vandalism."

Of course, that depends on the normative definitions of "obvious", "reasonable" and "polite", which are necessarily subjective, and vary from encyclopedia to uncyclopedia.

Patent vandalism is vandalism where both the reader and the contributor agree that it is vandalism. This is sometimes easy to determine (e.g. vandal puts HAHAHAHAH as their edit summary or otherwise states that it is vandalism), and sometimes slightly harder.

Other vandalisms

Vandalism is the act of intentionally and malevolently modifying or destroying something. (anything)

“When in Rome, do as the Vandals do.”

~ Napoleon on Vandalism

See also