From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- This does not count as an UnNews article, Nor does it count as an Uncyclopedia article. --NXWave 11:49, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete pl0x It's just not good enough.--Chobo66 17:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This article is too new (<7 days) - it should have been ICUed instead of VFDed (ICU now added). Nothing links to it, so there's no urgent need to get rid of it despite the fact that it's UnNews. I agree it's bad, but we have to give things time. And, while I'm being a complainy person, please don't add things to VFD when it's full - use the new Poopsmith's Lounge for that! -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Chobo66: It'd already been moved to userspace/
{{ICU}} 'd, so it's ineligible. –—Hv (talk) 13/07 17:54
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft, listcruft --General Insineratehymn 01:31, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Smash. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. *sigh* Not even...well, just not there. ----OEJ 01:42, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete /me makes a mental note to search for all occurrences of the phrase "So-and-so is gay." to point out more potential rubbish. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:53, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 13/07 14:40
- Kill it--Chobo66 16:50, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 19:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Could be improved, but the titles of "Things you'll find in God's Ass" sections make it worth keeping. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 21:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Great idea, bad article. It's more unfunny ranting than anything else. Also, it's 2005cruft. --General Insineratehymn 01:28, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- ??? Er, It's all, well, unfunny. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. That town is not at all as the author describes it. ----OEJ 01:47, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:19, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 13/07 14:40
- Delete Unfunny.--Chobo66 17:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 19:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I wrote this a long time ago, so I guess I'm biased. I can remember thinking of the idea, which I still think is fairly funny, but my execution of it isn't that great. Maybe someone could rewrite it.—Sir Mandaliet ♠ CUN PS VFH GN (talk) 04:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Yes, I saw that after I added it. I went to "What links here" and saw your userpage and thought: "No! Surely OEJ doesn't like this!" I was all ready to cross you off my list of nice people. :-) -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 09:48, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:18, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 13/07 14:40
- Delete Frankie! 18:32, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Somebody recently is leaving this article me in his will. Unfortunately I cannot claim this article myself and first needs all your credit card numbers. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:45, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Myth busted. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 01:37, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. How can there be no good jokes in this? It's like straight regurgitated spam. Unbelievable. ----OEJ 01:45, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 13/07 14:40
- ?--Chobo66 16:57, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 17:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)~
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Since there's already a page about them. Frankie! 21:40, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 21:44, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Of course, the duplicate thing's not a problem by itself. But this isn't great anyway, so weak delete. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:50, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Hits all the dumb notes: shit, rape, and kiddie porn. ----OEJ 01:20, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Boom. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:10, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 13/07 14:40
- Delete Horrible--Chobo66 17:26, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 20:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 20:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I feel sorry for people who are unattractive because they're sexist and aren't even funny. I hope for his sake he's rich, that's all. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 21:54, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
Delete. Merely terrible: unfocused, wandering, unfunny. ----OEJ 01:34, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep But only because stuff that's in userspaces is meant to be protected and I don't want to set any dangerous precedents. I will totally be looking the other way if some admin happens to erase things by an infinibanned user though. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as per Sbu. Userspace is sacred, except to admins. But its definately exempt from VFD. Stick to mainspace guys. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 12:11, 13 July 2007
- Keep - I don't see the point of deleting inoffensive userspace pages. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- It would set a bad precedent to delete a not shock/porn page from userspace, even if it is SU182's. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 03:14, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Userspace off limits for VFD. CRIMETHINKERS! --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:12, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Retract nomination I only put this here because I already tried QVFD. I started to doubt myself immediately after nominating this, but I failed to act on those doubts. So there. Pentium5dot1 05:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Userspace protection. —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 17:43, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Delete as nominator. I don't see why this exists. It is still locked as a year-old PLS submission (the process was presumably interrupted by SU182 being banned), and the real article is *almost* the same thing. Pentium5dot1 18:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per "It's made by SU182". --General Insineratehymn 20:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Something to do with a school, that leaves the rest of us in the dark. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 13:37, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. A fine example of the genre. The genre, however, is crap. RabbiTechno 13:53, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 15:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 17:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Some funny lines, but not really an article. ----OEJ 01:40, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:15, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 13/07 14:40
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 00:14, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Bandcruft as well. ----OEJ 00:31, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Destroy--Chobo66 05:35, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:04, 12 July 2007
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:33, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete RabbiTechno 13:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 16:18, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 17:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- De1337. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 13/07 14:40
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 00:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Kill--Chobo66 05:36, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oooo, Canadian name-dropping. Anne Murray must be rolling over in her grave. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:41, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Blame Canada ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:00, 12 July 2007
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:20, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete RabbiTechno 13:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 16:27, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 17:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- O' Canada... --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:16, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 13/07 14:40
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 23:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Bleah. ----OEJ 00:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete "What's your problem anyhow? What you looking at? This page too wordy for you?" Yes. Yes, that's my problem. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Nope--Chobo66 05:38, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 06:58, 12 July 2007
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:17, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete That one's really bad. RabbiTechno 13:59, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 16:32, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- —Comrade Pongo (V2) GS Implementor (Talk | Contribs | Award) 17:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Boom. --Lt. High Gen. Grue The Few The Proud, The Marines 04:17, 13 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 13/07 14:40
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 23:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not much to see, and no public restrooms. ----OEJ 00:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Everybody knows Shelbyville was founded by Shelbyville Manhatten, not drunken Welsh sailors. This is way too fact and figury also. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:48, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 06:57, 12 July 2007
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:16, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete RabbiTechno 14:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep A fun little stub. And I do love autumn colours - I wish they'd come round and do this in summer too! -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Very weak keep its ok, there are far worse things out there to delete. Needs expanding though. And pictures. And proofreading. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 05:59, 12 July 2007
|
Delete |
- Yay, VFD space! Anyways, delete. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 19:59, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 20:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Unless someone plans to fix soon, Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:27, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Put it out of its suffering. Delete--Chobo66 16:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I like the idea of the spray trucks going round and colouring the leaves, but that's all. Chances are it'd never be improved... RabbiTechno 14:13, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Keeping this one, and adding it to my to-do list. I'll fix it up at some point in the near future. If I don't, feel free to harass me about it. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 07/12 15:51
|
Keep |
- Keep The user who created it still works on it every day. its not done yet, so it still deserves the construction template. --General And Min. THEDUDEMAN 20:46, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Ah, the old "substituted construction" gambit. Still looks tagged, but doesn't show up in the WIP category. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:52, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- What the fuck? Frankie! 20:39, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Don't attempt to pull the wool over our eyes --General Insineratehymn 21:08, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Maybe they are still working on it, but they'll have to stop at some point. And since it'll likely get deleted then (unless construction involves deleting most of what was written), we might as well delete it now to save them from wasting any more time on it. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:01, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - if the author gives a shit and thinks they can turn this into a good article, then they should ask for it to be restored to their userspace. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:33, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. In some cases, it doesn't truly matter whether or not the article is being worked on but whether it looks like it's actually going to improve. And it doesn't. --SirIsaac 12:21, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- ? You can't fix this.--Chobo66 16:59, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Beyond hope. But let them move to namespace before deleting. Sir Roger 23:11, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The reason? Unfunny sex references. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- I just put a message on the talk page, asking him to move the page. Give the guy some time to think my advice over before nuking it. --Ye Olde Luke 01:55, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft Currently has gone the 4th longest of any article on Uncyclopedia without an edit. Sir Roger 21:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 01:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 02:50, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 20:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft Sir Roger 20:58, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I've never seen anyone get quite so passionately ranty about a dead woman before. The only good line: "She is also known as cheapest woman in Lithuania and for that reason her portrait was placed on 1/3 lt bill." How cheap does that make the Queen? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:30, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 01:11, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 02:48, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 20:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep It's quite an original concept and well done, despite looking rather like it was made in five minutes! -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:18, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The joke is there is no joke. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 17:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I had that very same conversation with myself, while I was on the toilet. Then I noticed that the roll of toilet paper was, in fact, just a roll of nothing, and forgot all about the whateveritis that we're talking about. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:03, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I laughed more than I should have. --SirIsaac 19:55, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Frankie! 21:04, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Ye Olde Luke 01:02, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep--Chobo66 17:05, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft Sir Roger 20:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:37, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry but either I don't get it, or there's nothing to get. Either way I'm voting delete. We can do better people. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:19, 11 July 2007
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- decent page, I vote to keep, what the hell is wrong with it?User:Froste21
- Keep. It may be a little messy, but with appropriate cleanup it'll be awesome. Adzma 11:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. all really needs to be done, is take out the fucking long list of "facts" and quotes. everything else besides that is pretty humorous. not to mention, there needs to be an article about Big Boss.--TravisBatos 20:40, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Recently deleted HERE. Now recreated with exactly the same content. The Oblong Lobster 19:42, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- QVFD Recreated content. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 19:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 02:09, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Obv. Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:27, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- CVP --General Insineratehymn 19:05, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. What's wrong with it? Memes out the yin-yang, seasoned with gamercruft and starry-eyed fanboyism, and sprinkled with misspellings, incoherence, and bad grammar. Other than that, it's pretty bad. ----OEJ 19:42, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- CVP, since it will come back otherwise. Plus whatever I said last time. Frankie! 20:25, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- TLDR er I mean Delete... no wait, both! ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 09:02, 11 July 2007
|
Comments |
I did QVFD it yesterday explaning it was recreated but it wasn't deleted. The Oblong Lobster 19:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, QVFD's a bit temperamental at the moment - I've kind of extended my poopsmithery to tidying up over there too, but there's only so much you can do with relisting stuff. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:22, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Honestly, if everyone saw how many articles in the archives have been recreated - of course some of them may have been started anew, but I think there's little point in continuing to vote against stubborn writers. And if you block the page from ressurection, they just put it under a different name. There's little point in getting into a power struggle. If people are upset enough about deletion to put their articles on again, I'd leave them. At some point in the future they will probably get renommed, maybe when the person is no longer active on Uncyclopedia. Sir Roger 22:56, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete--Cajek 19:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- page Side effects exists already. this article not funny. --Cajek 19:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep My understanding is that the cookbook recipes are short anyway, and this one's not so bad. Sir Roger 20:15, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Yes, we have loads of short cookbook thingumies, and this is not one of the worst. "While you are frying, slaughter the tribesfolk and scrape the delicate inner nostril and sinus flesh. Discard the remainder." I could just see Delia Smith doing it. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:14, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep but lose the Chuck Norris semen. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:06, 11 July 2007
- I hear you can't lose that - it just crawls after you, faster than you can walk. (BTW, check the orig version - IMO it's slightly better than the current.) Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 07/11 12:40
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Not sure if this is vanity or what. Either way, it's not up to much. RabbiTechno 18:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. What?! -- Mitch 15:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 16:13, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete 'Tarded. RabbiTechno 17:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- One paragraph. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 18:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I wonder what the average age of a VFD'd writer is. Sir Roger 20:21, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Merely cliche and childish, but otherwise quite bad.----OEJ 00:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I thought he was a Greek? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 00:51, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Listcrap. -- Mitch 15:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 16:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete 'Tis poo. RabbiTechno 17:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Roger 20:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Good subject, bad treatment. ----OEJ 00:19, 10 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Weird 2005cruft... JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 02:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It would be great to have a decent article on the subject, though. Sir Roger 02:29, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:41, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Not as worthless as some articles, but whatever... MaxMangel 13:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Strange but True-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:23, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 16:11, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete RabbiTechno 17:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It is a mishmash that can't be expanded. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 18:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep/Rewrite. I thought this was a pretty funny article when I started writing it. I guess it needs a rewrite or something. It's actually pretty good, but maybe I can convert the lists into sentences and paragraphs and add better jokes. This article is part of a series of Halloween movie articles, and without this article, it would be incomplete. PF4Eva, the King of Imagination talk Contributions 19:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete, not needed in any shape or form. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- "Abismal" -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:53, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Roger 01:33, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Article! Just Huff It™ - It seems that Zombiebaron has forgotton his POWER! Instahuff! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 01:57, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete True? Ish? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:59, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:34, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Nope-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:28, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Abysmal - just like TKF's spelling ;) RabbiTechno 18:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- And if anyone fancies a quick ban patrol through the IPs who contributed to it, that might be fun... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Somewhere between Weak keep and Keep Again, I like. Am I just feeling too nice today? Somebody punch me to get me in a worse mood. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:56, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Capercorn punches SbU to get her in a worse mood.
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep This was one of the ones I meant on the forum topic - I like it muchly. Added a picture to help others like it too...? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:48, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete, because I said so. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:43, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 00:44, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Roger 01:26, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Article! Just Huff It™ - Sadly (for the article), your image failed to impress me SbU. Oh well, time to push it up against a wall. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete because it has no useful function. MaxMangel 14:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep I dunno, it fills a niche. It's more random than random humour and less random than vandalism. Needs a prune and a watchful eye. Maybe I'll have a go later if anyone cares about this one! -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - If this gets huffed, AAAAAAAAA! has to go also. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:04, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. Why? AAAAAAAAA! was original for its time and displays a singular concept. This is just a random mash of words and pictures bordering on vandalism-- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep dammit. Though some individuals may not see it, a great deal of thought goes into this article, and the content is perfectly fitting of its name considering it to be an Uncyclopedia article. I do my bit to see that randomism and not vandalism is exhibited in this article, and it will be a shame and waste to see it go. And let's be realistic, people will come to create an article on a subject matter as important as random when they see there isn't one, and everyone knows deep in their hearts what an article named random is supposed to be like... --The Dit 08:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep I don't see what's wrong with this article, except that it could use some pruning. Some reasonable satire too. Sir Roger 01:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Unless it's literally all the same as Hitler, there must be something in here you can salvage. Get rid of the repeated stuff and show me nothing's left and I'll rethink. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 01:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I liked the old Adolf Hitler article. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:06, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Comment. I'm pretty sure it's an entire C/P. I tried to do some fixing, and 9/10ths of the images were broken, with the words "Hermann Zimmer" replacing "Hitler" or "Adolf". -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:51, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Doesn't suck. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:19, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep For those who don't know, it's about Victoria Beckham, and I reckon it's just as good as if not better than her main article. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Not that bad, needs a pic though. How about one of Posh during entering the Earth's atmosphere? ----OEJ 13:42, 7 July 2007 (UTC) (added one ----OEJ 14:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC))
- Keep, although it should still be expanded. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:02, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- ICUd once, not really improved that much. I would have deleted on sight but the article is six months old. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:17, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Really not really...you know...really...sort of...shit The Oblong Lobster 12:25, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't even have a properly ugly {{ugly}} template. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - does everything wrong. –—Hv (talk) 7/07 12:29
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 16:35, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 18:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Debate -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Too short; give it a kill. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:24, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:16, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 16:52, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete♠Insane-Contrast♠ 22:08 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 07:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Blecch Sir Roger 07:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- This article is a paradox -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 09:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Er, nah. But I'll transwiki to ?pedia. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:33, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Really, H? It seems more just rubbish than random to me. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:43, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 18:38, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Debate -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Uninteresting and short. Delete --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:29, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:15, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Horrid. RabbiTechno 16:53, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 07:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Double Blecch Sir Roger 07:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 09:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:50, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 18:40, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Debate -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Why does he live life backwards? Short. Delete --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:31, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 10:09, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 16:55, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 07:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Half a blecch. But still blecch. Sir Roger 07:56, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete-- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 09:53, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Townhatecruft. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:52, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Frankie! 18:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Debate -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:27, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 16:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
- Delete. I don't even want to know what it means. RabbiTechno 16:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
Keep |
|
Delete |
- 2005cruft --General Insineratehymn 07:28, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Roger 08:01, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Sucks poo. -- Hindleyite Converse 12:27, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Homer said it best: "I thought it was going to be fun and exiting, like that movie Spaceballs, but instead it was sad and depressing, like that movie Police Academy." -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:45, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. –—Hv (talk) 7/07 12:46
- Delete. Just not very good. ----OEJ 13:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Debate -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:55, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Dumpsterise. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 23:46, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 09:23, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep -- oddly enough, I kind of like it. Worthy topic for satire -- See this -- but article could use some tidying up. ----OEJ 13:47, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep The recent pruning was just a quoticide. I did a major cleanup of some of the lists - there's actually a lot of good things in there, but it still needs more pruning of the non-list sections. Read it before passing judgement. Especially the bits that aren't the first big chunk of text. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 17:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Well, it still needs a major rewrite now. I think it'd be best to just delete and restart. --Dexter111344 18:16, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Except for the fact that unless you're very lucky, the person who chooses to restart will be a fanboy who writes something ten times worse. If someone really wants to write something much better than this, let them ask to delete what's here then. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 19:02, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep per the «It'll get worse» rule of popular topics. ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 19:21, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but definitely needs re-writing. Sir Roger 00:01, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep - If we huff it, some five year old EDian will come on and make a vandalism. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:27, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep--Sir Manforman 19:24, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but it needs some layout help. Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 00:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
- Rewrite. Some tiny parts are worth keeping, such as the pictures of Zordon and the Pink Ranger. Could use better jokes, and some Super Sentai references. (Whoops, Forgot to sign my comment!) PF4Eva, the King of Imagination talk Contributions 22:50, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. This article was recently subject to a major 20,000 character pruning, but it still remains the listiest, unfunniest article I've ever seen. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:27, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Why is this a huge unfunny list? It really shouldn't be. --Dexter111344 16:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 17:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Becuase it's awful.The Oblong Lobster 11:18, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Nothing really worth keeping here. -- Phlegm Leoispotter * (garble! jank!) 09:58, 7 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep Go eat shit fuckers --Ekashp 17:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • FFS • WP) 17:52, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep The zenith of 21st Century cultural achievement. RabbiTechno 17:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Ughhh... --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 17:56, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep FOREVER! - Wtf is wrong with you? This is the best piece of literature on Uncyclopedia! You make me sick. --Kingkitty 18:00, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep You should be banned for nominating a literary masterpiece for deletion. --General Insineratehymn 18:13, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 18:32, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Roman Dog Bird 18:38, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep in accordance to the Go Eat Shit Fuckers Law. --Dexter111344 18:41, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Kids these days, with their not eating 'shit fuckers'. Why, when I was a lad, we couldn't wait to run to the candy store after school to purchase and promptly tear open a package of 'shit fuckers'. I'm drooling just thinking about them. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Because everyone else is voting keep and I don't want to look like I don't get it. I don't get it enough to be honest, but who does? The Oblong Lobster 19:37, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. MO just made me hungry. –—Hv (talk) 2/07 19:39
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Here we go again! RabbiTechno 17:50, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Quick tip Yellow - don't nominate anything in the Uncyclopedia in-jokes category. I suppose every generation of n00bs have to learn this lesson for themselves, though, so I don't blame you for trying. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- I, however, do. I'm plotting my revenge right now. Moo haha! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 18:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
P.S. Go eat shit fuckers.
|
Keep |
- Keep --Ekashp 17:54, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This is used on user pages. I found the image kinda amusing on Pokémon personally, though the replacement is perhaps more intelligent. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:38, 02 July 2007
- Comment Well, according to the rules, Pornographic/shock/gore images which are clear copyright violations and/or which serve little satirical purpose WILL be deleted without warning. I was merely trying to comply with that rule, as I don't find the image to be satirical whatsoever, and it's a pornographic image. --TV-VCR watch 07:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Personally I didn't find it pornographic. There's some cartoon nipples. There's far worse around. ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:58, 02 July 2007
- Keep. It's just a furry. I can't say whether or not it's appropriately used, as it's only used on userpages. Lastly, I'm well known for having cartoon nipples. One on each side. True story. But I digress. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:19, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep It's harmless. RabbiTechno 13:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I don't like the image(mainly because of the fact that I hate Pokemon), but I don't see any reason to delete it, though. --Dexter111344 16:23, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I could care less for the image though. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 17:58, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Roman Dog Bird 18:51, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Um, no. --TV-VCR watch 07:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Also, just a heads up, its generally against the rules to add more articles to VFD when its already over 15. :) ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 07:38, 02 July 2007
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff Old, ugly, verbose, unfunny bandcruft. Lamb of god dictionary will be a QVFD if this is deleted. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 02:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 04:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Good band, bad article ~ Dame Ceridwyn ~ talk DUN VoNSE arc2.0 06:18, 01 July 2007
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 17:35, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- Huff --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 02:48, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Yuck. RabbiTechno 13:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Dexter111344 16:25, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Roman Dog Bird 18:53, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
It's gone --The Great Yellow Crayon Get PWNED Yellow 130 is teh pwnz 00:02, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- I hate to look useful or anything, but what makes you think that adding that text has any usefull use at all? Instead of being useful, you just edit conflicted me while I was trying to clean out VFD. Shame on you. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:05, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
|