From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 |
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- This article had stuff about being gay in every version since it was created. --Sbluen 01:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- What the hell? --
 » His Majesty King George VI (the boxes)     02:17, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Not funny. Mean too. Modusoperandi 03:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- UN Security Council Resolution 1701: No Jack Bauer reference shall be made without mentioning his cellphone's battery, which is supposedly more comedic and enduring than all men's sperm counts combined. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Sonic's buddy doesn't deserve this. He doesn't deserve anything, really, but this is deplorable. EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Bye-bye. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:33, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- The primary editor considered adding some instances of "Cocksucker" enough of a rewrite to remove the template. Also, they removed the VFD thing. --Ж Kalir, Crazy Indie Gamer (missile ponies for everyone!) 20:42, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Another old article that Spang NRV'd. --Sbluen 20:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- "How the hell do you spell that?" D-E-L-E-T-E. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- I spell it Q-V-F-D. Seriously, this is too short to warrant voting. Just kill it. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Great Thom Yorke's ghost - this is awful. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:34, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- This article is boring, which makes it an excellent "in-the-style-of" piece. I say rewrite tag it. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:37, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Spang NRV'd this article that was created more than a year ago. That shouldn't be done. This should still be deleted because it is ugly and not funny. --Sbluen 20:34, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Potentially vanity. Not funny. Modusoperandi 21:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Spang probably misread the years on the history page and thought the article was just a day old. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:35, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm tempted to say QVFD. But EX-TER-MI-NATE it either way. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:55, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- Awful. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:38, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Don't know how that happened! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- This article is not funny and spang should have deleted it also. --Sbluen 20:24, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Crap. Modusoperandi 21:41, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- I had more fun watch a nerd playing FPS's with two video cards than this piece of junk, which was, supposedly, also work of a nerd. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:33, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- EX-TER-MI-NATE. Bah. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:56, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
- I didn't laugh once. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 15:39, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Too random and boring. Spang should have deleted it instead of removing the NRV tag. --Sbluen 20:14, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I removed the NRV tag for these because they no longer have no redeeming value. That doesn't mean they're all that good, but the NRV had served its purpose for most of these, as the authors have at least made an attempt to make them better. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- The author didn't even touch this after it was NRV'd --Sbluen 20:48, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, ok. Whoops then. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:52, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Not that I find the article offensive, but I expected more than just two stereotypes (vodka and Russian reversal) stretched to an extreme. - User:Guest/sig 17:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- As a page that mentions its creator (from an edit by that very same creator) it's vanity and should go away. Plus it's not funny. Modusoperandi 17:07, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- No, go ahead and torch it. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 22:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Was about to delete, but spared it because it may be an Uncyc in-joke I don't get. - User:Guest/sig 17:03, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Pirates, Oscar Wilde, Bush, Ultra Jesus. What else should I say? - User:Guest/sig 14:43, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Unfunny randomness. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 14:50, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. It has lots of random stuff. --Sbluen 21:56, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Excessively unfunnily random. Modusoperandi 22:04, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Biased (I'm the author), but I think it's funny to the millions of people who have heard of this major-label band (which Sir Cornbread has not). --Falcotron 20:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- The author seems to be working on expansion and I'd like to see what will be done with this within its thirty day stay of execution that the template gives it. Not a bad start, IMO. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 23:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Give it some time to improve. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 00:59, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep. I think it's a near-perfect confusion of the band and the drug users (with some very funny observations on the latter) and great pics and captions. What more do we want? I think that making it longer for length's sake would spoil it. After all, didn't someone once say that brevity is the soul of wit? There are much shorter articles around that haven't been NRVed. Not to mention great gouts of absolute garbage. And Chicks on Speed (sadly) is not an obscure band by any means. -- Sir Armando Perentie
 KUN FP 04:38, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- Looking Better --User:Tom mayfair/Sig 07:46, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- TO THE FURNACE!!! Utter crap. Short, stupid, and author has repeatedly said he doesnt intend to add any more content. I've already NRV'd this twice. This is ED caliber material, and it needs to die. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 20:01, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Delete Not once does it mention the cold truth about chickenheads. This article proves to the world that Colonel Sanders has won.
For Shame. --User:Tom mayfair/Sig03:35, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Please note that Sir Cornbread is misrepresenting the history of the article, as he has some kind of inexplicable vendetta against it. Perhaps Chicks on Speed killed his parents. Please see the extensive discussion on User talk:Sir Cornbread about the article (the whole page, as Sir Cornbread has spread the discussion to other sections). And note that Spang removed both of his NRVs and threatened to ban him if he NRVd it again. --Falcotron 20:13, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Please note that I'm not misrepresenting the history in any way, and that Spang never said one single word to me about this. Also note that Falcotron is probably in this band or something, and has been bitching about this for about 2 weeks, so I finally brought it here. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 20:18, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- The history speaks for itself, so I won't comment on that. However, I think a quick view of [[1]] should make it obvious that this is a notable band, not some band that I'm in. --Falcotron 20:32, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Please note that I was the only contributor that but a relevant image that had to do with Chicks on Speed. See Chicks for further details.
- --User:Tom mayfair/Sig03:35, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- If you can add the running chicks=chickens/chicks=girls joke to the article text without ruining the rest of it, I welcome any contributions. And I like the picture. --Falcotron 01:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- As I said on VFH it'll never get featured. It's simply a joke that most people won't get...but that doesn't make it crap. Modusoperandi 05:58, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Non-sense. Keep beyond reasonable doubt. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 11:17, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- You guys do know that this has survived VFD before? Keep. --Hobelhouse 14:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- I don't see what's so bad about this, except that it contains TRUE FACTS about the sprite-comic community :) Mr. Briggs Inc. 18:35, 10 August 2006 (UTC) Eh?
- This article is funny, I say keep it --SU182 02:57, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Good. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
- Keep (again). —
 Major Sir Hinoa (Plead) (KUN) 07:29, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Honestly, I don't get what's funny about it, is it some sort of an injoke I'm not aware of? -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo  GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 21:46, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Google 'sprite comic'. This is a parody of about 9/10 of the search results. --Hobelhouse 01:02, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- I get the joke, but like in the movie "Road Trip" where Kyle makes teh funnay about "because it's your dog!"... sometimes it's not whether the joke is gotten, but rather, how good is the joke really. Still, the image for the thing if fucking classic! Unless we save the image and recycle it, this article should be re-written. Also, leaving the article up may inspire a decent writer to hit the job up... Maybe I'm that writer. Hmmm... I'm off to play. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 04:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, I don't think that something which is essentially a carbon-copy of another thing can be legitimately referred to as a "parody" of what is being copied. There is not a shred of original humor here; it's just another example of the 9/10s of the aformentioned Google search. It's too true, and as we all know, truth has no place here. Unless some actual original comedic commentary/content can be added to this article, I feel it has no place on this site. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Kill. Serves only as an example of every point in how *not* to write an article - a list of unfunny quotes, followed by a random list of names, followed by another equally-useless list and topped off with an annoying but much-reposted picture that's been copied verbatim from the Internet where it should've been left to die. Incarcerate this article in CVP prison as the criminal offense which it is. --Carlb 23:29, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Especially for that picture, but for the rest as well. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 23:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Avert thine eyes! Delete. --Voter Cray Z.
 [MUN] [FUN!!]06:08, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yawn... oh, and kill it. --George VI 06:53, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- EX-TER-MI-NATE. I don't feel this article warrants any witty banter. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 12:55, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Crush. --Uncyclon - Do we still link to BENSON? 07:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Frag it. It's a stub and just says a few names without being funny at all. Besides, it's a plural of Cigar, a long thought-out and actually funny article. Cigars is pure clutterUser:Cigaro Cubano/sig 14:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Smoke it -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 14:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Cigar. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
- Off with it's head. Stubby, needs substance, easily redone by an interested person later. If no-one interested shows up, so be it. Cull the herd. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 13:58, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- This stuff is worse than mouth cancer. -- The Colonel (talk) 14:06, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- As I've already mentioned to ZB, but for the sake of others, I cannot copy and paste mine because Mhaille (oops, namedropping) made some excellent contributions to it and if I copy/paste he will not be credited. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 19:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, and just in case anyone wants to see the new version before they vote on this, there it was (but it was a double-redirect, so it isn't there now).
- I have no problems making this happen. In fact, I moved yours there, just to make life more difficult for all involved in the PLS. Protected so dingos don't eat your baby - if you need to tweak it, ask an on-call admin to open it for a bit.
 Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 20:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- I pondered a minute or two before VFD'ing this, but I'm still left with the original question: What the hell is this? --George VI 22:20, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
- Could be good, but isn't. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 17:43, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- What the Dickens is this junk? --Hindleyite | PL | GUN | WOTM | Image Review - Use it | Converse 20:14, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's yet another piece of drivel by someone who believes himself to be far more clever than he actually is. EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 12:59, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Keep I think it's funny. Keep it! ZniLe 18:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep The graphic could be better but I like the wordplay. --George VI 01:04, 7 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Tell me, will the kid cry if you ban him? Kokot.kokotisko 08:20, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Better question: Do I care? –H. 16:50, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oo! I know, I know! Pick me, pick me! --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
- I NRV'd this three times, the dumbass user removed them all three. This has no reason to survive. KILL IT. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 18:40, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Wow... do you think that we need a Forest Fire Month too? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:41, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm almost tempted to QVFD this... but as it has actual (albeit dubious) content, I'll stick with EX-TER-MI-NATE!!! Oh, and HUFF the user. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:43, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- No Ghelae, I say Forest Fire YEAR. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 18:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
I put an NRV sticker on it one last time. Should it be removed, the article should be deleted and the offender should be banned for a week. Voting is closed. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY) 05:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- No. It's Funny. Keep. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 23:20, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- This was better before it was rewritten. When Emmzee wrote it, it was supposed to be about some guy desperately asking for help. --Sbluen 23:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Revert before the idiot. Keep. Comic gold. Kokot.kokotisko 08:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Um, this is explaining something to do with the site itself, it should by no means be deleted. Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC) Eh?
- Does it have back links? Even so, unhelpful, unfunny. Are you gonna rewrite it? Kokot.kokotisko 17:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Hey dudes I found that somebody recreated a deleted page, what should I do, help me I'm a n00b Kokot.kokotisko 16:28, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's been nominated twice before, but I agree - this should be deleted. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Not applicable for NRV or QVFD, yet needs to be deleted. Anyone else think we need a Forest Fire Month? ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- EX-TER-MI-NATE. It's extinct, anyway. Oh, and AF-FIR-MA-TIVE to the month-long auto da fe. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:11, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- My poor brontosaurus, the bad guys over here want to delete you, don't worry, after death you will come to heaven. Kokot.kokotisko 16:18, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Forest Fire Week was blasphemy enough. Mr. Briggs Inc. 16:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC) Eh?
|
| Keep |
- Strangely enough, I think this one hits the nail on the head. That guy wasn't human. In a rare moment of leniency, I'm voting to PRE-SERVE this article. Now if only we knew more about his brother George... --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Needs lots of work, the page is unorganized and writing is unfocused but that the page must stay if only for that spangled-flag outfit.--WatchTVEatDonutDrinkBeer 19:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- I know nothing about real Liberace :(, but some crap is better than other
|
| Keep |
- ... but ... but ... what about that side boob? ... I almost jacked off, and you want to delete that? Kokot.kokotisko 16:10, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Give it a chance. I'm gonna personally delete the worst parts. Kokot.kokotisko 13:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- If the mediocre Euroipods is considered one of the best articles on this site, then this should at least have the chance to be improved! Mr. Briggs Inc. 13:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC) Eh?
- Funny.---Asteroid B612
 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 14:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Our standards are higher now, and this article needs deleting unless someone can seriously rewrite it. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 13:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Our standards are higher now, and this article needs deleting unless someone can seriously rewrite it. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 13:31, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Stupid as it is, the picture is lovely and worth saving. Kokot.kokotisko 13:54, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
Brave Asshole - Josif Stalin - Adolf Hitler - Santa Claus... Kokot.kokotisko 13:51, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- kill it Kokot.kokotisko 09:48, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I put it on QVFD, but too long, I guess. Any reason why it should live? Didnt think so. DELETE. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 06:32, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- BURNITATE IT. Literally. If visible flames don't reach the articles below then I will remove what little respect I had about the admins' control of the Uncyclopedia. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 10:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I like my Valkyries, but this is just... well, poop. EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Thhe alien spacecraft pair. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Not funny.--Shandon 01:45, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Murder it dead. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 01:58, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- This one's not half bad. Not a keeper as it is, however, but still not bad. I request an expansion, and a possible tie in to the kind of mentality behind MST3K's bumper segment of "Objects that are Funny or Not Funny when Floating on Wires." (e.g. Christopher Reeve in Superman = not funny. Christopher Reeve in Monsigneur = funny. Christopher Reeve kissing Michael Caine in Deathtrap = very funny.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- teenagerish crap kill it. Kokot.kokotisko 09:57, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- WARNING: ALIEN CRAP OVERLOAD. ADMINS NEEDED TO BURNINATE ALIEN CRAP. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- To quote the learned scholar of Neo-Classical Russian literature, Mr. L. F. Gumby, "MY BRAIN HURTS!" EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- The second paragraph is way too serious, but this is a good article deserving of expansion. Why aliens Ghelae? I smell a conspiracy theory! Mr. Briggs Inc. 18:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC) Eh?
- And also, Keep. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 20:43, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Boring. Kill. The more it dies the stronger it becomes. I don't believe that some other smartass wouldn't come up with the same idea again in under 1 month. Kokot.kokotisko 10:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- WARNING: ALIEN CRAP OVERLOAD. ADMINS NEEDED TO BURNINATE ALIEN CRAP. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- One-trick pony. Unfortunately, that "trick" is collapsing in a heap and drooling copiously. EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:24, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- All this crappy alien shit is really astonishing... I'm very tempted to just go ahead and Nerv the whole lot of them, and uncyclopedia's rules be damned. I might get banned for the offences, but the world would be a better place for my efforts. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:37, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- This deserves to stay, I think that this is a valuable contribution to uncyclopedia, what are you? Texticidal? Perhaps it needs to be broken down though. Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:22, 1 August 2006 (UTC) Eh?
- This far better than crap. It's not the kind of article you'd take out for a picnic on a clear summer afternoon, but it's not crap. Modusoperandi 01:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm a futurama fan and I like it.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 14:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Yes we are texticidal with boring texts. Boring, uninspired. Kill it. Kokot.kokotisko 10:15, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, even more crap "alien"-based articles. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 16:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I can't really say how I feel on this... I know the character, there's some intelligence at work here, and it has potential for expansion. So I'm going to watch it. If it gets better, I'll let it slide. However, if the standard 7 days go by and it doesn't improve, I'll come back and do the Dalek thing to it. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 18:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- I fixed this article up a bit yesterday...didn't add much original content, just cleaned up what was there. Maybe that's why there are suddenly 3 votes to keep? ;-) --Shandon 18:05, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- One of them was already there... and I'm still voting against (I have high standards). ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:07, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Uh, and after I changed it, kokot deleted about half of the text there.--Shandon 18:09, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you Ghelae...if I had more time I would rewrite it completely, but I gotta work on my PLS article...--Shandon 18:21, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- The idea, mildly above average if not quite original, is to comedize upon Pioneer plate interpretation. This should go beyond noticing that the human depictions are naked. Take your time studying the Pioneer plate, make fun of binary sequences and ultrafine hydrogen structure and other details, kick the sci-fi nonsense, rename the page, and it might be fun. If you don't feel up to the task, wait a while until you are at least 20, and try again. And read more science and less bad sci-fi. Kokot.kokotisko 10:49, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's utter genius and not just because I wrote it. --Ogopogo 13:07, 1 August 2006 (UTC). By the way, I've spruced it up a bit a few minutes ago to make the humour clearer. Even in its earlier form, it was intended as a spoof on the Pioneer 10 plaque that Earth launched into space hoping some other civilization out in space will find us and ... find us, they did; the article is trying to present Earth and Earthlings as though they would be presented in a wikipedia of another planet in another solar system (with a higher civilization). --Ogopogo 18:32, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Add a template with wikipedia's article about pioneer plate.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 19:16, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Rataube ... I've already added such a Wikipedia template - Although the Wikipedia link appears on the template as "Life on Earth", it in fact links to the Wikipedia article on the Pioneer plaque. --Ogopogo 21:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
*More VFDing... ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 13:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
Utter gibberish from someone who huffed way too much airplane glue. Despite clarification, it's still just not funny. EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:03, 1 August 2006 (UTC)- You think this is utter genius? Well, I don't. Delete. -- SonicChao Babbel!Contribs 13:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I suppose Ogopogo has a point, but the article would need to be expanded more, not have such stupid alien words and be slight more parodic (perhaps how we on Earth would see an alien rac like that. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 18:39, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- I had thought the alien words would make it more realistic, but OK, I made another edit and changed the alien words to more plain vanilla technical expressions. --Ogopogo 18:57, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but it's still not going anywhere for me. I'm afraid my vote stands, although I've deferentially toned down the vitriol spouted by my pet death machine. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- I withdraw my vote now, if it doesn't get deleted I might try to rewrite it, but now I don't care either way. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 11:13, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- This has potential, believe me, but to make it golden Ogopogo would have to come up with a consistent, funny interpretation of the plate different from the intended message. Kokot.kokotisko 08:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- May I ask why this was put up for VFD? Delete it if you must but at least tell me that it was done because you believe that this article genuinely sucks and not out of bitterness due to certain other reasons. --EBCouncil Speak with the Council 07:33, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- ??? Kokot.kokotisko 11:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- More VFDing... ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 13:00, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- QVFD. Or NRV. This is too stubby to warrant a trial. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:08, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Man! I get the joke, I see the humor... it's there! but it's just so poorly written... and I have no idea on how to save it. A heartwrenching delete. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 01:01, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- 1. Delete the line with the word "hintergrund". 2. Delete the next line. 3. Repeat 2. Kokot.kokotisko 11:39, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- More cleanup of should-of-been-FFW'd literal Alien Crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 11:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- NRV, or preferably QVFD. Not worth the trial. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:13, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Men, I'm moved to tears. Bow and shudder! The end is here! Keep it and make it a featured article as it is now, as an illustration of originality and comedial talent! Kokot.kokotisko 11:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. You're right. This if fucking Duel Masters. Mainly because I love it. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 00:55, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
Perhaps I shouldn't have made the reference to the now-defunct Duel Masters article, as it seems that in so doing I spawned the same sort of skewed voting on this article as was seen on DM's VFD/VFH nominations. I remind all would-be voters on this nomination that the official policy regarding "so bad they're good" articles is "There is no such thing as a good bad article." To paraphrase several admins, "Crap is crap, and should be deleted." While I thought DM was funny, it didn't pass muster according to site standards. Besides, this shit's not one quarter as unintentionally funny as DM was. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- O man I wander if all these kids will cry if we mercilessly delete their laborious contributions. Kokot.kokotisko 11:33, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- More cleanup of should-of-been-FFW'd literal Alien Crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 11:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- NRV if someone can come up with a decent take on this topic, otherwise QVFD. This is too short to stand trial. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:18, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, but just barely... It's not horrible, it's not stupid, it's just kinda "wishy-washy". This article has an odor. You notice it, but it's not like, really bad, still, lacks funny. And as I've said, "Needs funny, people". TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 00:51, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Also, I must come clean. I'm pretty sure I stole "Needs funny, People." from Gwax. Possibly someone else. At any rate, someone posted it under the old format VFD once, so, I'm just a big fake. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 00:51, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Hey! I think it's hilarious and exciting and deliciously fragrant, and not just because I wrote it! Also: deleting something because it needs cleanup is silly! -kotra 22:40, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Drop the "Bilbo Baggins" line, and this article could live, be expanded, be cleaned up, whatever. I must submit though, that it's not an insult to Uncyclopedia. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- The same as Sir Cornbread. Kokot.kokotisko 11:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- More cleanup of should-of-been-FFW'd literal Alien Crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 11:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- NRV. Jeez, Ghelae, quit merely indicting them and just skip to the executions! I mean, that's what we came to see, right? --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:19, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- It needs a whole lot more than cleanup. It needs to die. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 22:44, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- No, we want to delete it because every wuss who adds the word "alien" in it thinks that it makes her article special and funny. But now we are at you, you cannot hide your stupidity forever. Kokot.kokotisko 11:30, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- Oh, I get it now! You want to delete it because it has the word "alien" in it. But you cannot hide their existance forever! They walk among us! -kotra 22:49, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I want the articles to be deleted because they are, for the most part, articles which survived FFW but shouldn't've. As for your final sentance, that should be TFAODP'd. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 11:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- For shits and giggles, I'm considering sporking this article over to Wikipedia directly. They deserve it for being unconscionable pricks. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 03:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
- Man, I must be getting soft in my old age. The line at the end about "the Rock's Melons" alone is worth pardoning this from the Axe. 'sides, it's a joke for Kiwi's, and they don't get enough respect. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 00:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC) --- Besides, Cantalopes fucking suck
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Kill. Kokot.kokotisko 11:19, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- More cleanup of should-of-been-FFW'd literal Alien Crap. ~ Ghelæ talkcontribs 11:48, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- EX-TER-MI-NATE to make room for the Muppets. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:20, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
- This article mentions the Flying spaghetti Monster. And if there's one thing I hate, it's the fucking spaghetti monster. To my chagrin, FSM has a following, but this article can be aborted. De-fucking-lete. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 00:43, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
|
| Comments |
- This is actually not an alien crap, Crest of the Stars is such a good piece to watch or to read... But I somehow don't see the comedic value of the article.Kokot.kokotisko 10:56, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
- This is a JPop crap, apparently copy&pasted from ugly Wikipedia with minor, unfunny BS-ization. However, believe it or not, but it is highly probable that this article would be edited by somebody else. It needs to be rewritten. I'll go to see if I can save it from execution.
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Random humor. - User:Guest/sig 17:15, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- TO THE FURNACE!!! -- Sir C Holla | CUN 20:04, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Wow, a reference to Hermann Hesse cannot save this? That's bad. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 23:22, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Nothing funny or even interesting. --Sbluen 08:30, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Low quality writing backed by a clueless and irritatingly persistent user.--
   Sir Flammable KUN  (Na Naaaaa...) 03:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with flammable --SU182 03:21, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- I agree with SU182, Flammable is right. >:| --Parinoid 04:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- I just love watchin' this article get deleted repeatedly. Huff it. User:Tom mayfair/Sig
- EX-TER-MI-NATE. While I'm sure Miss Middleton is a lovely
golddigger starfucker girl in person, this article isn't lovely in the least. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:53, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
(UTC)
| Keep |
It is pure crap, granted, but I'm thinking rewrite tag? -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 08:22, 11 August 2006
|
| Delete |
- Pure random garble. --Ogopogo 00:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Kill it --- Jaques Pirat IS NOT FRENCH! TP, F@H 02:22, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Light it up with a blowtorch. --George VI 02:34, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Another worthless article about Jewish Kings.---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 00:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Might as well just delete it and let someone start fresh. No saving grace in this one. -- Imrealized ...hmm? 23:28, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- If someone wants to write a valid article on King David, I say tag it with rewrite. Otherwise, EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 14:56, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm with KIY here. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 20:07, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- 100% plagiarised from http://www.jomiller.com/guide . Funny, but if the site just starts completely stealing material that's already on the internet, what's the point? --Joewithajay 18:31, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Kill it. Modusoperandi 20:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Not too funny, and it's ripped off somewhere else. --Admiral06 04:04, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Funny-ish but ripped off --SubPOP talk F@H 18:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Say NO to plagiarism. Delete. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 22:46, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's plagiarised so we have to delete it, I'm pretty sure it's a rule :P --Maj Sir Insertwackynamehere
 CUN VFH VFP Bur. CMInsertwackynamehere | Talk | Rate 14:46, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- I should that say I didn't know it was plagiarised when I posted it. Can't be bothered explaining how, but I'm not opposed to deleting it if people don't like that. Note that French military victories is 100% plagiarism too, and seems to be acceptable. Could always try completely rewriting a similar thing from scratch, but that's still plagiarism in a way. No, wait, it could be a homage! They're OK! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 18:42, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Ignorance isn't really an argument? I mean, it's one thing for an article to be inspired by something else, but just clicking copy/paste ruins the idea of the site? --Joewithajay 18:45, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- I wasn't using ignorance as an argument to keep it, it was an explanation for why it got posted. And you'll notice it was a comment, not a keep vote. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Bollox - I just added the section on Scotland without realising about the VFD. Can't we just wipe the content (with the exception of my scotland bit) and start again?. --Bonjo Nelson 15:58, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Feel free to start your own version. I could get your section back for you if you like? • Spang • ☃ • talk • 16:57, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- I was absolutely shocked to see how long this has survived. Lets change that. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 07:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- As a recovering Pringles junkie I say, "Die, you overprocessing ulcerating potato byproduct." Modusoperandi
- Pointless drivel. Jesus, Ninja, Pirate, wank wank. EX-TER-MI-NATE. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 13:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Die. --George VI 02:33, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Holy lord. Wow. You know, if I ever start feeling "down", all I have to do is visit VFD, and I can console myself that I have not ever written ANY of these articles. TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 04:23, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Even though I like the idea of a SuperJew - this is really not it. Needs to be huffed and perhaps someday someone would try again....-- Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 20:38, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Pictures are so bad they made me laugh. So I guess I am sort of on the fence... but... delete. --George VI 00:02, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- ---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 00:39, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Now this is what VFD is for. Modusoperandi 06:04, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- KILL! -- Sir C Holla | CUN 06:12, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- Super Delete. --Sbluen 07:48, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
|
| Delete |
- Has potential, possibly a re-write, but who has the time? The line about "great for parties" has a chuckle in it, but the rest is just, blah... TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 13:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- EX-TER-MI-NATE. I mean, "Splunge." Seriously, this is drivel. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 16:24, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- I'm almost certain this was a ripoff of George Carlin. Smashy. User:Hinoa4/sigVFD 17:08, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- To the furnace. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 07:54, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
|
| Keep |
- Interesting play on Quakerism (normally a pacifist religion), including a spin via the Quaker oatmeal products. --Ogopogo 01:14, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Delete |
- Weak delete here, It's just not "doing it". I'm tempted to not put this one up for vfd, but, it seems it needs something. Thus, community vote. Just kind of a weak article, you know? TD Complain here MUN (Insert Funny Quote Here) 13:55, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- It's the motion of the ocean, not the size of the waves.. There is no motion in this article, hell, there aren't any waves. TO THE GALLOWS! --PiOfFive 17:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
- What the guy above me said. Delete. --Voter Cray Z. [MUN] [FUN!!]07:34, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
- Kill. -- Sir C Holla | CUN 19:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
- EX-TER-MI-NATE. Rather predictable, and not amusing. (If someone wants to try their hand at a rewrite, I'll reconsider it.) --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 15:04, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
|
| Comments |
- Would work better if it had lots of references to Quake. --Bonjo Nelson 14:50, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
|
