From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- God Almighty Listcruft. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 00:35, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Crucify -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete And/or move to userspace.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:00, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 09:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. If anyone feels they could save it, move it to their space, but in the current state, it shouldn't stay. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I started this one, but I'm pretty indifferent to whether it stays or not. --So So 00:52, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- The beginning is good, but not enough to sustain a keep. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:54, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps an expansion, along with images, and it would be worthwhile. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 00:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with TKF, the dialogue between
God, I mean G_d, and Moses is inspired, but the list is atrocious. RabbiTechno 09:18, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete listcruft, and general shittiness -RAHB 00:15, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Mission: Failure, starring Tom Cruise as himself -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 00:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per RAHB--Sir Manforman 01:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I thought those Adidas commercials where "impossible is nothing" were, though naive in some respects, rather true. But then I read this article, and I realized it's truly impossible to find this article funny. Bunch of lists, namedropping, stupid concept, canned anti-Americanism. All around bad.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:58, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 09:19, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. As per Ljlego and others. ----OEJ 15:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. A near perfect example of a terrible article. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:17, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. The only thing I liked about this article was that snazzy template at the bottom. Maybe if it actually WAS A SATIRE OF SHAKESPEARE it woulda done well. -- Le Cejak • <-> 00:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- As Always--Sir Manforman 01:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Very strange...apparently this cannibalistic Shakespeare chap is not the William of the same surname. Go figure. In any case, that qualifies any mention of Willy as a namedrop, and the little list at the bottom is randomness (as is the rest of the article. Plus, "The Milk of Human Kindness"? WTF?-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 09:21, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Forsooth, 'tis random bollocks. Ah, the language that gave us Shakespeare, how well it adapts to all situations. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Never have I seen an article with so many links. I have also never seen an article-long list disguised quite this well. The stupidity of the concept is incredible, and the coherency leaves much to be desired. I was left quite confused, and glad for my knowledge of language surpassing this article's.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:11, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete The idea could have evolved, but it's current state will lead it to extinction. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 00:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- What's the fucking point of having this, it's a poorly formatted non funny article, Obvious Delete--Sir Manforman 01:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 01:17, October 11, 2007
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Gave me a headache. RabbiTechno 09:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ----OEJ 15:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Per Lj. Every word of his essay. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete "Although this business claims to be the Waffle House, you can not eat the walls." What? That doesn't make sense. And it's all downhill from there, including "Fiona has eaten the walls of a waffle house and even though it didnt taste like waffles. it was gooood yummm." Wow. -Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- International House of SUCK -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 00:53, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- WTF?--Sir Manforman 01:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:49, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 09:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Incoherent and poorly written. Look at the last sentence of the Founding section. Horrible. ----OEJ 15:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Astoundingly random and completely pointless. Mind you, I now fancy a waffle with maple syrup and ice cream. Mmm. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. LOLcats can haz an artikl? Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- i had a deleet voat but i eated it :( -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Kp Cuz ths be muh furst keep vte YAH! Le Cejak • <-> 03:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep it! Srsly, u jest. User:Shimmy/sig 10:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Kthxbai. RabbiTechno 09:01, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Funny! Internet memes are good fodder, and this one is cleverly done. ----OEJ 15:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete An article about a stupid subject, written in the style of said subject. On talk pages, eating ur sanity, fine. In an article, not so much. Die, article, die!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
ROTFLOL!! Oh wait, that's not funny. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 00:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- This page is not good. Please delete. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 00:10, Oct 11
- Delete--Sir Manforman 01:12, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:47, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 09:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Yer standard towncruft. Although the town itself is kinda nice but dull, this article is just dull. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Piss poor article-writing, with a stupid concept and not enough meat on its bones either.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:07, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Obviously--Sir Manforman 01:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 02:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No doubt about it. RabbiTechno 09:27, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Scrap
- Delete. Starts poorly, deteriorates rapidly, kinda tails off at the end, and does so in a really short space of time. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Extreme NRV -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Yep crap. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 02:56, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails throughout. RabbiTechno 09:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Reluctant delete Reading about "Numpad8" being a terrorist organization made me giggle inside. However, I'd put up my house in a poker game against a chance of expansion. Also, I've already agreed with Ljlego below that all Numpad pages should be huffed. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 09:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Just random and unfunny. And badly written. And stubby. What a surprise. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:33, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Short non-needed dull dumb stub--Sir Manforman 01:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 01:24, October 11, 2007
- Delete And while we're at it, all the Numpad pages. Why do we need them? Just why? A look at them shows that they all suck, and I don't like sucky articles. Delete this and all of them.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:25, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- As per Ljlego We can just have all the shit in the numpad section of the keyboard link to the actual numbers. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 02:57, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 09:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Absolutely pointless. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:32, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete --Sir Manforman 01:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Nuke -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 01:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete So strange, so bad. It's an unoriginal list, and more than a bit racist. Not worthy by any stretch of the imagination.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:23, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:04, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 09:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Staggeringly poor idea only matched by the execution. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:30, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete--Sir Manforman 01:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 01:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This article is so bad that all I can say is "unfunny crap." Seriously, that's all.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:22, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. So boring I can't even remember it now. RabbiTechno 09:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random, incoherent, kinda listy, really dull, pointless, deserves to go. Also, I wanted to write a longer delete reason than Lj for once. Hurrah! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:29, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as per lounge -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Nobody calls my Lord teh ghey. Unless it's well-written satire, which this isn't. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 01:03, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Seriously, what's worse?, this... that?? Horrible--Sir Manforman 01:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I was baffled to see the changes in concept this article purveyed. I counted five after a cursory glance. I don't see how Wikipedia is related to heresy, and it's not. Plus, this is poorly written and unfunny, and random. Can't see much list there, but it's just as bad anyway.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:20, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 07:02, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. My eyes' inbuilt low-quality filters blocked it out after the first paragraph, but that had been plenty enough to convince me. RabbiTechno 09:08, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete it is a gay concept and such a poor job has been done on it Evil_One275 | Talk | Contribs
- Delete. Badly written, no decent ideas, won't be missed. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:28, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as per lounge -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:55, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Eh?--Sir Manforman 01:10, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Basically a bad homophobic rant that is a list. It changes narrative perspective more than once, and those men don't even have five o'clock shadow!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:16, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 06:59, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Someone's stubbly boyfriend has upset them...! RabbiTechno
- Delete. Listy, unfunny, waste of time. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 16:24, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Hey, hey, we're the zombies! ---- Kip > Talk • Works • • 04:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Thinly disguised listcruft. RabbiTechno 09:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I lost the will to live halfway down. So I went off, read a good article, regained it, and came back to vote delete. This is really crap. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's the time of the season for deeeeeeee-leeeeeting! -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete My 2-year-old cousin started crying when I opened this page. Poor thing...Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:32, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Nobody cares--Sir Manforman 23:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Terribly stubby, not all too interesting. TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I fail to see the great idea. It's a dull stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:06, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I see the idea. It's actually mildly amusing. But unless anyone cares to adopt this article with its "great idea," then this article doesn't really have a future.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:55, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:40, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Moderately interesting idea, but everything else about it is crap. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Really poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:05, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It's quite strange to me that so many articles created by noobs such as this bash noobs. It's really quite baffling. Oh, also, it's bad.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:53, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:24, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Insert Reason Here TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Translating random words into 1337 does not equal humour. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:10, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not a joke to be found. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Unfortunately, using 1337 and various iterations of it in an article only makes me dislike it more and more. It's sort of interesting in that, were I clicking on it completely blind, I'd expect something moderately OK (and somewhat related to IRC). But this....blech.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:50, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:51, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:24, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. OK, it's random rubbish. I peed it, and said as much. The author freely admitted it, and said he'd put it up as an example of the difference between Illogicopedia and us. So let's delete it for the same reason. Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- <3 you Testicles, but you need to keep these type of articles in ?pedia. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete I think that, with a little bit of work and a lot of "this/that/third/fourth/penis"-s being removed/condensed/changed/reworked/penis, this could work as an article here. But, unfortunately, it doesn't stand a chance.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. There are fragments of funny, but also large pieces of unreadableness. ----OEJ 00:21, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- DESTROY. Shitty article by a Themadddog sock. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 03:30 Oct 08, 2007
- Strong Delete.Wow,This Article Rlyrly Sucks,Dont You Agree?I Know I Do. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Wtf was this guy smoking - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 03:48, Oct 8
- Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 03:52, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Article gets deleted. Again, hits almost every delete trigger. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- VFD and VFH at the same time!!! It must be huffed! EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 16:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It's like that other UnNews about the animals, except with even less effort put into it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete And Feature -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:27, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete--Sir Manforman 20:59, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. And then delete it again in case traces of its bytes remain somewhere in cyberspazz. ----OEJ 00:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. I've said it before in jest, but I'm dead serious this time: this article is almost so bad it's worth keeping. I laughed out loud at how terrible it was many a time whilst reading it. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:52, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Comment We could fix this up slightly to infer that the subject of the article is actually the reporter. Conniving 15:19, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- We could fix this up slightly so it never reproduces, too. That would be a good thing. ----OEJ 00:24, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- DESTROY. Shitty article by a Themadddog sock. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 03:30 Oct 08, 2007
- Strong Delete.Wow,This Article Rlyrly Sucks,Dont You Agree?I Know I Do. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:45, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 03:51, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Hits so many delete triggers I don't know where to start. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 18:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is perhaps the epitome of bad grammar. From The Capitalization Of Almost Every Word to the misuse of the word "witch" (don't they teach homophones in, like, third grade?), this article has the added offense of being radically horrible. The worst is, this concept may have had promise.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Description of article, from article: "And Crap Fell Out Of The Sky Unknown." ----OEJ 00:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 01:18, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as per lounge TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Is this the last for today? There's only so many bad Metal Gear articles I can read before my brain explodes. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:49, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Did you know that Jack Bauer is the new Chuck Norris? -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 13:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I have half a mind to go all Big Boss on all of these Metal Gear Solid fans. Yet again, we have randomness, namedropping, and supreme stubbiness disguised by multiple headings and large images.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:40, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Fucking kill it -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Mr. T, Oscar, and overblown horsecrap like "100,000,000,000,000,020,000 times cooler" as a descriptive phrase. ----OEJ 00:29, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as per lounge TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. And again, dull and kinda random metal gear stuff. Yawn. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 13:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This is actually perhaps the most salvagably coherent of the Metal Gear series, but that's obviously not saying much. This one suffers from just as much randomness, namedropping, and a little misogyny thrown in for good measure.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Aim. Reload. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:30, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 20:25, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Video games just aren't funny. The Oblong Lobster 22:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. As a parody of Springsteen it suxors the wangchops. (What?) ----OEJ 00:31, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as per lounge TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. More random and unfunny metal gear rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:44, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 13:42, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Herm? This is strange...because I thought this was a satire of encyclopediae, and yet here we have facts being presented for our enjoyment. Excuse me while I don't laugh at these tidbits from Metal Gear Solid.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:36, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- The Shit One -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I thought this was going to be about something like Liquid Plumber. Darn. ----OEJ 00:32, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as per lounge TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:37, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow, that's a lot of unfunny. What is it about games that inspires such drivel? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Crapass -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 13:43, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It's from a video game, right? Well, that's not the approach to take to a video game character. No way, the fanboyish tone is way teh bad.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:34, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:32, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Too many italics and acronyms, and it's just plain hard to read. General Insineratehymn 15:17, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 15:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 15:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete An idea with some potential, but comes off as rather dull in execution.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Basically a dull, hard-to-read, poorly thought out stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:31, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Careful Insinerate, V-week is over, limit's back at 15. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:11, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- I think it shoud always be at 30. 1) Gets rid of junk faster, 2) I find reading shit pages up for deletion funny. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 16:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with Kip the Dip--Sir Manforman 16:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- WTF? General Insineratehymn 15:07, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete How very bizarre. And not entirely good at all.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Although I might consider moving this bizarrness to Illogicopedia, as I did with The great pasta wars. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 15:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:26, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep What's wrong with it? -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 14:18, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete - I'm not even going to comment. --AAA! (AAAA) 01:52, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- De-testicle-ify. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete article and the 'Lol.gif' image. {Ikabu}BUZZ...FLICK...GURGLE... 06:26, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Utter rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Crude, stubby, close to a deadend, and a terrible idea. Kip, what's wrong with it, you ask? It accentuates bad article writing: it makes little to no sense, it's beyond salvation, and it's a terrible idea. Plus, if you take away all the disturbing ASCII art, you've got almost no article.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Uh. I'm dumbfounded. I like the title, because I'm an idiot, but I unlike the page, because I'm not that much of an idiot. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:36, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Welcome to Dullsville. Population: this article. That was terrible. TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 01:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Ou est le funny? Oh, and watch what you say about Dullsville. I live there. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:24, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Redlink hell, and one of the most boring pages I've seen in a while. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Welcome to Crapville. Population: TKF's joke, and this article.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 14:56, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- It isn't Miller time. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 16:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:38, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 14:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Elmo, the furry little douchebag. Surely, so much promise in an article can't possibly fall down to the depths of "worst article ever written." Well, it doesn't, but it also doesn't miss by much.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- It's 80 little ideas randomly wrapped around Elmo, rather than one big idea, also wrapped around Elmo. El Mo, incidentally, is what they call me in Spain. I'm going there this summer, to be something called a "bool fiter", whatever that is. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:30, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Hellmo--Sir Manforman 15:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Elmo doesn't like this. Neither does Mr. Noodle. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 15:46, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Emlo -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 16:16, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment But where shall all of those images go? :( Conniving 15:22, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Sir Manforman 12:11, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I fail to see the point. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- 6 -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 14:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete This article is both odd and odder, bad and worse, and stupid and purple. It also sucks, in case you didn't notice already.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:02, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:28, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Manforman is now on form. This is bad and badder. The Oblong Lobster 17:39, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:09, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep Chronarion's authorship aside, what's wrong with it? Sure, it's not hilarious, but lines like "Hot on the heels of the tremendously successful daylight savings time changes" are certainly worth keeping.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:04, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Not great, but far from crap. Plus Chron speaks. Speaks! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 15:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - There is no criteira for all old News is to be deleted, let alone VFD. If all old news was VFD then, this page would constintly be clogged with them (IMO if there such a policy for old news to be delted, then it would be for QVFD). --Pleb- Sawblade5 [coolest link ever] ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 15:27, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep because apparently this is a personal attack against Chronarion. Le Cejak • <-> 16:00, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:21, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Don't annoy or be against Chronarion. Ever. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me!
|
Delete |
- Delete. Old unfunny news. That, and I'd loved to see one of Chronarion's articles huffedSir Manforman 14:44, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment - It's not that Sawblade, it didn't make me laugh--Sir Manforman 15:29, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Guys, why are you misinterpreting my comments. It's not a personal attack, and that wasn't the only reason why I VFD'd it--Sir Manforman 16:03, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- That's not a sufficient reason to VFD an article, you know. Yeah, the rules are somewhat fuzzy, and you're entitled to VFD anything you like in theory, but not finding a page funny isn't grounds for deletion. It's just grounds for you not to read the article. Also...
- @ Sawblade: There is no policy for and/or against old news. Manforman's nom wasn't even related to the old. Also...
- @ Cajek: Is that the only reason why you're voting keep, to make a point? Shame on you. In conclusion....
- It would be great, you know, if you guys voted solely on the article's merits (which, to his credit, Manforman did). That is all.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 16:08, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Random crap + too silly and obvious sexual references + even more random crap. Hitchcock deserves better -Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 08:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not funny, quite random, listy, poor. Murder it and bury the body with only a paranoid invalid as any kind of witness. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:01, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not very good, and the Hitchcock thing gets boring rather quickly. RabbiTechno 09:09, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:26, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Cock -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Extremely hardcore weak-ass keep Since when are letters a bad thing? -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 14:41, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Keep it's part of two templates. Like what's down there...It needs to be re written yes, but not deleted. Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!)
- Weak Keep as per Severian. RabbiTechno 09:20, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Non-Needed unicode page Sir Manforman 11:54, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Again, seems totally pointless. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:37, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I wonder who has time to find all of these characters in Unicode.....Y God, Y?!? Seriously useless, and I wonder....how did you find this, Manforman? Good snag.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 15:01, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:34, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete The most pointless thing since the word 'issue'. The Oblong Lobster 18:14, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
- LAZOR Another freakin symbol article? JediBob Things I've said Things I've done 22:15, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Got a soft rewrite tag, but it needs something a bit harsher. RabbiTechno 11:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete That there is an article called "Dumbass Syndrome" frightens me. That this article exists saddens me. The worst offense, in my book, is the Chuck Norris reference, which is entirely unnecessary. Plus, Jack Bauer is the new Chuck Norris, now!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:18, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. A not very funny stub that has remained untouched for a while now. RabbiTechno 09:49, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Woah, that's pretty random. And listy. And not funny at all. Kinda like the film, now I think about it. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:53, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:35, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete {{stub}} only gives the article a temporary stay. With an article like this (misspelled title to boot), it should be a stay of about 2 seconds. It's random, uses bad redneck humor (good redneck humor is hard to come by), and then deteriorates into a list.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:13, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Per lounge nom. Really poor article, random (again), unfunny, no good ideas. And Al Gore, who's rearing his head in bad articles quite a bit these days. Ding-a-ding-dang my dang-a-long-delete. As they say. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:22, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Do we have any good articles on industrial bands?! RabbiTechno 09:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Aim. Reload. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:04, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete You'll find that randomness is the common thread in all of these. Makes me wonder why people don't just read HTBFANJS. Because if they did, then these articles just wouldn't exist..ah well, perfect world's don't exist. Suppose we'll just stick to deleting the crap then.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Per lounge nom. It's long, listy and unfunny. Consider CVP as it keeps getting recreated as a crap article? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. About half an ounce of jokes in a 14lb article. RabbiTechno 09:28, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per lounge. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:15, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I don't get what it is about Japanese things, but they seem to attract fanboys to our site, just to write crap articles about them. It's a tenuous balance when making fun of somebody, and this one tips far too yang. And forget you if you think it's racist that I used a Chinese concept for a Japanese joke.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Per lounge nom. Random, Norrised, listy, unfunny crap. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:58, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 09:07, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:23, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Though I have been guilty of this on occasion, I don't see why people find it necessary to create ridiculously long names and then make them acronyms. It doesn't work, and this, plus the list, makes me sad to see this possibly hilarious page go. In fact, when I get up the courage to write again, I'm doing this one.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:04, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Per lounge nom. Random, kinda namedroppy, obscure bandcruft. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:54, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. One of my favourite bands ever, but a terrible article. RabbiTechno 09:05, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:30, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Uses random numbers to make itself funny, and fails miserably at it. With no discernible idea or concept, I'm left wondering if this is an actual band. I think it is, though.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:02, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Just for your own information, Ljlego - yes, they were/are a genuine band. They pretty much invented industrial music. Not bad, if you like that sort of thing :) RabbiTechno 01:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Per lounge nom. This is not a good idea, it's an unfunny stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:47, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I think this may have been one of my own earlier articles - had I not have forgotten about it, I'd probably have VFD'd it myself :) RabbiTechno 09:11, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:36, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Though lines like "Qwertyitis is nothing to be ashamed of. Although it is extremely disfiguring..." show potential, the rest of the article is crap. Especially that too-long number thingamajig.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. not funny, dose not have enuf content & concept is not very good Evil_One275 | Talk | Contribs
- Delete. So bad they deleted it twice. I have used that line before, but this is so unoriginal it deserves a recycled poor delete reason. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:01, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Bleh. RabbiTechno 11:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. A prime example of just writing the opposite of what is true and pretending it's satire. It's not. ----OEJ 18:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Fuggehdaboutit. Actual New York Pizza : Pizza Hut's Brooklyn Style Pizza :: Good articles : This article -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I like TKF's analogy. It's also worth mentioning that OEJ is completely correct. It's also also worth mentioning that meta humor such as "In fact, Noo Yawk City is so small that this is likely a vanity article written by bored ass residents" falls flatter than a tablemount.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:38, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- De-lete. I expected this to be a good Pokémon article. I was wrong.[citation needed] -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 04:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC) {
- Evil_One275 | Talk | Contribs
- Delete. With all those red links amongst the blue ones, all you'd have to do is replace the black letters with *s and it'd be like looking at Old Glory. RabbiTechno 08:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Just tragic. The quest for a good pokemon article continues.... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:58, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Why is there more than one article on Pokemon? It's a fucking computer game! The Oblong Lobster 21:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Weakness -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Delete The concept is so good, woe is me! That such a good idea went to waste on an article that can only conjure up the incorrect meaning of decimalisation (400!? IT SHOULD BE A POWER OF TEN!). That nitpick is just that, a nitpick. There's plenty of crap in the article. Including *gasp* a Chuck Norris reference. DIE!-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:37, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kind of an interesting idea, but execution is poor. ----OEJ 18:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Random nonsense, incredibly listcruft, and a littly bit namedrop. ---- Kip > Talk • Works • • 04:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. A big list with a little (uninteresting) article around it. RabbiTechno 09:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random, listy, dull, just really really poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It tries and fails to make a Russian reversal joke. "In Soviet Russia, Gorbachev kill Caillou!" is the best they could do. IT'S ALWAYS SUPPOSED TO END IN YOU!!! DAMMIT! Ahem, that aside, it's crap.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep - Its a humorous page, and I think it should stay around a bit, give it some time to improve. It is funny to at least some people, and if you don't like it then why don't you just leave it alone? --Spazit 07:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete - Crappy schoolcruft that has been created too many times. It may be time for a CVP. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 09:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Rubbish. Unfunny to pretty much anyone not from the college, and probably unfunny to most people from it as well. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:46, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete if not improved before the vote reaches critical mass. ----OEJ 18:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Spazit, this article as it currently exists is too poor to keep. Take it to your userspace (User:Spazit/Wesley College) and fix it up. Listen to OEJ, cut out the randomness, expand on the minimal good lines, and all around make it presentable.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The reason, Spazit, that things people don't like on here can't just be left alone is that before you know it the entire wiki would be filled with dross, rather than the (ahem) high quality and expertly rendered humour we are all so used to finding here. RabbiTechno 09:06, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Suggestions for article improvement: Clean up the grammar: periods and commas are followed by a space, and terms like "Asian" are capitalized. Add appropriate and, if possible, funny illustrations. Expand beyond the short generic paragraphs into something resembling a parodic look at the actual institution. And add a vanity template to identify it properly. ----OEJ 18:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. NRV. --THE 01:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 09:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not very good: mostly disconnected from funniness. ----OEJ 18:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:48, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete "Sir Francis Toast was relaxing in his garden enjoying the summer sun whilst his many slaves pretended to be gnomes" is the funniest line. That that line isn't very funny just tells you how stupid, random, awful this article is.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Listy badness. Pseudo-Bible-quoting, but mostly just the musings of an idiot, this thing is pointless.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:54, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and redirect to Misquoting Jesus -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. One or two raised a cackle, but the hit rate is too low for it to be worthwhile. RabbiTechno 09:12, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Another poor list. Pretty much 100% wibble. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete A poor list i can not believe that Uncyclopedia let it live when i was made back in 2006 Evil_One275 | Talk | Contribs
- Delete as per previous comments. ----OEJ 18:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- SUCK IT! -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:49, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. How very...odd. I'm not going to say I like it, because I don't like it. I hate it, in fact. It's random, it's stupid, and it doesn't even have coherency.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:52, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Being a Southerner, I find your nomination offensive Ljlego. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 20:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Indeed, truly strange. Ten out of ten for spelling though, which is a rare thing. RabbiTechno 09:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Bizarre in a bad way. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, obsessed with the Dr. Strangelove image and little else. And for all that it fails to have a single image. What in the wide wide world of sports is goin' on here? ----OEJ 18:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Just kidding. -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 20:40, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- FAIL What is this author/article TALKING ABOUT? You would be wrong if you answered "Tillie the Pirate". -- Le Cejak • <-> 01:45, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Well written, but without content. RabbiTechno 09:16, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Lucky this chap doesn't write Tecmo's ad copy, they'd not have sold a single game. RabbiTechno 09:19, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. "Being the grammar freak that she is, she slew all living flying horses upon the discovery of them on the island". What? Awful. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:20, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:51, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Holey moley. I find myself baffled each night at the awfulness of these articles. I find myself with the urge to type "worst article I ever read" but I know, somehow, that it will just be untrue.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete--Sir Manforman 23:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I scanned this but I still didn't really see anything worth saving. I hope I'm not wrong. -- Le Cejak • <-> 00:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I read it. There's nothing there worth saving. From the very first line to the very last blessed letter, this is crap, pure and simple.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:35, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow, another crap game related article. Who'da thunk it? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:14, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Oversized breasts -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Gamecruft, belongs on a gamecruft wiki. ----OEJ 18:56, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Wiggity-What? -- Le Cejak • <-> 00:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete See below (twice).-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:34, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ~I try to avoid generalising, but it seems a fairly solid rule of thumb that all articles mentioning chavs are crap. This is more proof. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. RabbiTechno 09:21, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Would need a lot of rewriting to make the concept work. As it stands it does not work. ----OEJ 18:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:08, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Another sad case of "Great Band, Bad Article" -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:30, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete If I was more initiated, I'd do a delete reason sufficiently obtuse and long-winded to be a Yes lyric. But I'm not. So, though the article takes a shining to Yes, I don't take a shining to it. That is all.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:33, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Yet more random rubbish. You'd think people would run out of it some time. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:59, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Parts are OK. Unfortunately, those parts comprise only the first five sentences. RabbiTechno 09:23, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:09, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- That's pretty clever! I lied. -- Le Cejak • <-> 00:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I stopped after the acronym. No, I'm serious. It's just not worth it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:29, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I didn't stop. I wish I had. I'll never get that minute of my life back. Really poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:53, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I wondered, upon seeing the title, if I even needed to read the article. In the interests of fairness, I did. I needn't have. RabbiTechno 09:25, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete i wish i never read it i want my minuet back Evil_One275 | Talk | Contribs
- DIE If theres one thing i hate its crappy memes... and this one has them all --Moneke 10:57, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Short an' unfunny. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:28, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Cheesy, completely unoriginal, and who the hell is that woman on the page? Apparently someone famous, but I don't know her.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:26, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Per the above. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:50, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. If she was cute I'd vote keep, because you can never have too many pictures of cute Asian chicks. However, she isn't. And the article is rubbish. RabbiTechno 09:27, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The original parts aren't funny, and the funny parts aren't original. ----OEJ 19:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:11, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- What now? A Japanese pop band? Pirates? Delete? Yes. -- Le Cejak • <-> 20:39, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete So poorly written and stupid that I was about to call it vanity. Then I looked it up, and lo and behold it's a Japanese pop band. Which didn't help its case at all.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 01:22, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. It's bad, it's dumb, it deserves to go. But I want to use that Nosfercatu image in something. Splendidly sinister! --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:42, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I have actually heard this band. To be fair to the article, it's not quite as bad as the band are. Under_user, I'm preserving Nosfercatu on my userpage so it won't die with the page. RabbiTechno 09:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|