From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- A REALLY BAD Article That I Saw In A While. Nobody cared, But I Do.--
FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 07:29, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
- I voted against it a year ago and have not seen much improvement. --Count of Monkey Crisco 08:54, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:06, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
- HOLY FUCK, that's listy! -- 21:14, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
- This needs to stop existing. --HM (T) 22:34, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
- uh huh. -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 22:38, November 4, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete Lots of talk about Microsoft and nuke railroads, but no actual jokes. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 18:29, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Qui a coupe le fromaaaage? --Count of Monkey Crisco 19:14, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It's complete patented nonsense. And not the good kind. --BLU Scoutgineer 19:26, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:22, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- ._. --HM (T) 22:03, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete I don't see what is funny about hating a video game character. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:07, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- It's bad... and not in a good way. Get rid of it. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:12 November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Misssile impact in two minutes, sir. --Gamma287 10:55, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Give it the axe. --Count of Monkey Crisco 11:30, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:20, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete Very random and not funny. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 07:58, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- TL;DR. More accurately, reading it beyond the first paragraph is hazardous to one's health. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:08 November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Obviously written by a person with a burning hate of the Republican party. Why is Mitt Romney listed as a member, though? Terrible satire. --Gamma287 10:51, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
It has promise, but that's why I'm saving one in my userspace. fuck that, it's too shitty --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:00, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- GAAAAAAAAA! That was so filthy, I had to actually sanitize my whole system (Security Essentials, full system scan at 25%...) Throw it into the lava oceans of the Nether! --BLU Scoutgineer 18:25, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:19, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- This is shameful. --HM (T) 22:07, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. A very weak concept not at all helped by random filler and political humor that feels severely dated. --Count of Monkey Crisco 13:25, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 19:28, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:23, November 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Pile of meh, couldn't stop yawning, yadda yadda. --BLU Scoutgineer 00:49, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- I didn't really have to look past that badly photoshopped picture to tell that this would make me vote delete... --Gamma287 04:40, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- needs more funny. -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 07:20, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- ?????????? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:02 November 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Typical bad article.--
FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 11:17, November 3, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Say what --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:01, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:06, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh god, kill this. --HM (T) 21:41, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
- Who (or what, for that matter) is this about? --Gamma287 01:22, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
- delete. --Black Flamingo 18:15, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Huh? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 18:44, November 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Burninate! Random 2006-cruft. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 14:08 October 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:52, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
- One image and no content. It's like a Wonka bar with no golden ticket (or chocolate candy, for that matter). --Gamma287 02:10, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
- Very random, at that.
1234 ~ 14:25, 31 October 2011
- Oh my. --HM (T) 21:41, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- huh -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 07:50, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
- The only good bit is "got milk" and its caption. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:59, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Dangerously cheesy. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 09:54 October 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Black Flamingo 10:14, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:51, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
- This article needs to be beaten, then stirred until light and frothy. --Gamma287 02:00, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Silly, based on nothing, seems confused as to what the role of a Horsemen of the Apocalypse actually is. In short; could be a nice red link to have around. --Black Flamingo 01:55, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I love the smell of red links in the morning. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:00, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Crapfest. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 09:56 October 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 15:35, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
- The others should've dumped this one in the same place they dumped the sixth horseman... --Gamma287 02:04, October 31, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. If it has 'decent bits' and so forth, surely the impetus is to improve the article rather than to delete it?--Sycamore (Talk) 18:09, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- OK... --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:37, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I did consider adding this when I readded content after t was vandalized... So yeah delete. -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 09:38, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 03:21, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- This article is an enemy of the gurkha... whatever that means. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 12:43 October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I really wanted to improve this after reading what was a decent, if short, introduction. But alas, it's pretty unsalvageable from then on. --Black Flamingo 01:59, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Furthering my reasons: It's got a few decent bits, but it's thin on the ground, lists, and some bits feel like they've been taken straight from Wikipedia with a few bad jokes added in. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:40, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (3) |
- Weak Keep It's bad but not VFD bad.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 23:14, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. No where near bad enough, quite amusing in parts.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:08, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep We should not be deleting this. mAttlobster. (hello) 22:59, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (7) |
- Wanders around randomly (into an unfinished ending) without actually saying a single thing about film criticism. Nah. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:18, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Not terrible but unfinished and not so good -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:29, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I see the idea, the guy is watching the film over time. I think. If not I have no idea. Userspace it.--Nikau 00:53, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I suppose it would be best gone, or in userspace as TKF suggested down there. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:15, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Userspace. I don't get it. Is it supposed to be reviewing a movie, or is it a catch-all review of every single movie ever made? As it is now, it's an unfinished piece. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 12:39 October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 22:25, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
- As above. --Black Flamingo 01:56, October 30, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- keep? Anyone truly think we will get a better article unless a writer explicitly says they are rewriting it? --Nikau 23:33, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I don't see your logic. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:39, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Oh god. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:51, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- WTF?--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 16:59, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:26, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:04, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- As a VFD nihilist, I believe that no article is better than one staying around with someone saying that it might get rewritten (not even by the person saying it). --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:22, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 21:28, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Already have YouTube, A bunch of aristocrats fucking. Awesome vid, YouTubers... and this is shit anyway. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 12:10, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Should named it Gaytube Home Page--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 20:11, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- No. -- 20:34, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Nothing new or at all interesting. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:18, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:24, October 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- As Uncyclopedia's one and only Earthbound fan (I think), I find this article to be fucking retarded. And no, I won't fix it because: A. It can't be fixed, and B. I can't write anything funny. --Roman Dog Bird 04:00, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 12:11, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 19:14, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 20:13, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh. Kill it with earthquake. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 04:06 October 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (7) |
- EYE BEAMS!!! On a more serious note, it's appropriately used in articles and not all of those are VFD-worthy. If you don't want it to be used on the more high-quality, well-written articles we have around here, then just restrict its use to not include those articles. However, that doesn't change that it's appropriate for some of our more eccentric articles. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:44, 26 October 2011
- Keep. What Socky said--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 15:38, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- VERYKEEP. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- KEEP mAttlobster. (hello) 20:17, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Controversial nominations will get you nothing but admin tools and unwanted pregnancies (which you can fix with the admin tools) -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:13, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- bowling ball pasteurize big -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:25, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- ??????--
FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 03:55, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Aside from revealing shitty articles through what pages use this template, I really don't see what purpose it serves. Other than to say the article is horribly written and should probably be deleted? But isn't that what the maintenance templates do? Anywho the joke is very old and overused and this should have been restricted to userspace years ago. -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 08:38, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- See what the keepers are getting at, BUT IT LOOKS SO UGLY. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:37, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- I have always considered this template to be some - how do I phrase this - gay-ass bullshit. pillow talk 22:05, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Meh. If someone explains this to me, I might be willing to keep or delete.
- This template basically says "This article is stupid and not just funny but I like it anyway." pillow talk 22:07, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Kept although a makeover at very least would do this template good.
1234 ~ 12:23, 28 October 2011
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. Or at least just a stay of execution? For a half dozen more hours or so? I will work on this thing. --Imrealized ...hmm? 22:38, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Not that bad.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 00:18, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- COCKS. -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 09:43, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- a wizard did it, he fixed it! --Nikau 14:04, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- No pictures, random flashbacks... PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 25 October 2011, at 23:02
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:22, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- It's ugly and unfunny. Not much to say.
1234 ~ 01:56, 26 October 2011
- Bleh. A disgrace to rock and roll. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 02:51 October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Hmm. A Gray count of 30. Oh God. Is my hair falling out? I'm about to vomit... --Gamma287 04:06, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- If there are free birds flying around, this tank is going to need some anti-aircraft weapons. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 13:14, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Maybe it's betterered? I did pretty much a full rewrite of the top, and will work on the bottom tomorrow. If this is deleted in the meantime, please drop it on a user subpage for me. Thanks. --Imrealized ...hmm? 05:28, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- I have now fully touched my hands to this and the result is..? S'okay. --Imrealized ...hmm? 02:03, October 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Kept... in that the page isn't going to be deleted. Not in that the content was kept. But no matter.
1234 ~ 12:21, 28 October 2011
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Maybe we need an article about the Hebrew encyclopaedia. Not this one.--Nikau 00:48, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:56, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Big Poopy Kill it--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 04:09, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Deserves to die --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:16, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh wow. -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 09:42, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. If this is for UN:REQ, move it to a subpage or something. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:59, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 17:45, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! This was stolen and not changed from Wikipedia! TehGrammerNazi 21:49, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:28, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
- burn --Nikau 14:08, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- This isn't even what Wernicke's syndrome is. Relatedly, it's bad.
1234 ~ 00:55, 26 October 2011
- Can't we just call what you wrote a total rewrite of whatever it is this page tries to be, redirect this to your article, and call it a day? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:50, 26 October 2011
- But Wernicke's syndrome is something completely different. I KNOW THESE THINGS.
1234 ~ 01:55, 26 October 2011
- Well, uh, we could move this to what it's actually about and use this title for a disambiguation page. And if it turns out that this article was about the same thing that you wrote about, we can still do that thing I mentioned earlier. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:05, 26 October 2011
- This isn't actually about anything, though. It tries to do too much or something and fails at all of it. You know what? I'll just shut up.
1234 ~ 02:16, 26 October 2011
- Delete.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 17:45, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:14, October 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -6
|
Keep (7) |
- Being rewritten, apparently. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 05:35, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Rewritten and stuff. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 06:52, 26 October 2011
- VFH. -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 08:35, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed, VFH it! Kudos to the Sockmeister. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 09:44 October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- : ) —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:51, 26 October 2011
- Keep. Now that it's been rewritten. -- 12:34, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
# Delete. As far as I can tell, this was never good. -- 23:23, October 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:23, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 17:00, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- O_o Why did IWKY333 vote to delete my rewrite??? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:49, 26 October 2011
|
Comments |
- {{VFD}} added to page after the fact; timer reset. Please remember to template the nomination pages.
1234 ~ 02:02, 26 October 2011
- Yeah, sorry. I usually don't forget that. -- 12:33, October 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Kept; completely rewritten. Also, the voters say so, but this isn't even the article that was nominated.
1234 ~ 16:42, 26 October 2011
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Unfortunately, a lot of the Microsoft articles are pretty crappy. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:43, October 22, 2011 (UTC)
- And this one's no exception.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 02:06, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:10, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:22, October 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 03:58, October 25, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -5
|
Keep (6) |
- And now we also have an unfeatured one! We should fix that by featuring it. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 08:34, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 08:43, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 08:46, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Although I agree its weird we have to two articles about the same thing, this is actually petty good. We do have Pacman and Pac-Man after all. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 13:10, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- What TKF said. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:52, 23 October 2011
- Keep What Zombiebaron said. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:56, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- But you already repeated what Zombiebaron said! >.< —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:58, 23 October 2011
- I just don't want what Zombiebaron said deleted, so am advocating keeping it. If you imagine that I'm Jesus, you might understand. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:01, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for the misunderstanding, Jesus. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:17, 23 October 2011
|
Delete (1) |
- We already have one, a featured one. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:46, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. This was just terrible.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 02:18, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:22, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. I can't find one particularly funny thing here. TehGrammerNazi 03:36, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Such a promising concept... Best to burn it down and start again. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:30, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:27, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. Should I save us all some time and ask Data to fart on it? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:25 October 24, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (7) |
- COMPLETELY REWRITTEN. I'm gonna keep expanding on it too maybe. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 08:47, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- TFK, that is one rawesome kef...keffy...uh, iPhone. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Oct 23 '11 15:53 (UTC)
- Oh noes, you misspelled his acronym! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:07, 23 October 2011
- meh -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:28, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Woo! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:53, 23 October 2011
- Keep I heard this got rewritten. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:02, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- like whoa dude it's like rewritten --Roman Dog Bird 20:12, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Woo at what Socky said. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:37, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Totally tubular, man. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:22 October 24, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Yeah yeah we know they suck. Thank the lord we have fifty 12 year olds pointing this out to us. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:12, October 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh. Unfunny on all accounts. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 01:41, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Incredibly stupid--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 02:04, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:12, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 8
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (8) |
- Err... --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:33, October 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 07:56, October 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Nope! Sorry, it's not funny. TehGrammerNazi 19:01, October 22, 2011 (UTC)
- We don't care about your shithole town in Holland. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:55, October 22, 2011 (UTC)
- "My town sucks"-cruft. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:02 October 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:09, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Why don't you move your ass out if you hate it so much.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 02:12, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
- delete -- KittyKitty (t) (c) 02:22, October 23, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Burninate! The opening paragraph looks like it was taken from Wikipedia, and the rest of it is unfinished nonsense. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 12:52 October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Burn, although I fixed up the intro a bit. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 14:57, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- WTF? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:30, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- wtf indeed ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:31, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- The whole score was composed by Korn. --Roman Dog Bird 22:02, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Smite. Looks like a three year old taking a crap. TehGrammerNazi 22:25, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- G.P.S. - GAY PENIS SEX --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 23:32, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep.It has the potential to be a nice article. it just needs a little more work --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 18:03, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Surprised this stayed under the radar. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:49, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- There used to be slightly more content, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:52, 21 October 2011
- Obliterate. A crappy shitload. --AlmightyGameDude 21:26, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:29, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Crap stub thats not even funny. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 21:32, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- WTF? It's not funny at all. Burninate it! TehGrammerNazi 22:25, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Mattsnow 22:26, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (5) |
- What the heck?--
FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 04:55, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 05:29, 18 October 2011
- nope nope nope. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:49, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Blasphemy!!! Aleister 18:04 21-10-'11
- NIGGA, R U FUREALZ The article is pretty bad-ass. Take a look at the other articles above this one, so you can see that Beastiality is azome! --AlmightyGameDude 21:32, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- I forced myself to read through this to find the funny. It was painful and fruitless - much like a testectomy. Pup 04:15 18 Oct '11
- Redirect to HowTo:Blow a dog -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 05:01, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Random mess. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:12, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! It's not funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 22:29, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
- It needs to go away. There might be two funny sentences out of the whole thing, save the lists... A somewhat high profile subject for comedy like this one demands an article here, but lists don't make an article. We could also redirect it to Aleister's classic Skunk. If it doesn't get deleted, I'm definitely putting a fix tag on it. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 22:57 October 18, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 08:19, 22 October 2011
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Eeew, ugly. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:21, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Redirect to Human -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:08, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Nope! Not funny. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TehGrammarNazi (talk • contribs)
- Delete. Uh no.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 02:05, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- What the hell is this mess? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 12:46 October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Jackson Bollocks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:20, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- ??? It looks like a legit article on something fake. Odd... -- 00:22, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- The fuck you talking about, Magic man? Nothing in the article makes sense. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 02:23, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:07, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 02:28, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- ???? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 12:47 October 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Happy Hour? Nothing worth retaining. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:22, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Socky summed this up on the talk page better than I ever could: "...the article is of pretty low quality." Well, that just sums it all up, doesn't it. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:41, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:10, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
- The word fail has a new meaning. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:28, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
- AAAAAAAAA! THE HORROR!!! TehGrammerNazi 22:17, October 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Ass-sterioids --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 00:56, October 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Da ardickle iz azome! --AlmightyGameDude 12:07, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Shitty, stubby poo poo. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:47, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't go anywhere. Nah. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:08, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- By all means rewrite it if you want, but for the love of God, do it in your userspace. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 16:17, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- No. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:45, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Now that's just disgusting. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:00 October 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Imma' has this blown up. --Gamma287 `
|
Comments |
- Re
cyclewrite. I believe that if this was rewritten a little, it could be great!TehGrammerNazi 11:48, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (7) |
- Keep. I really like this one. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 08:10, 16 October 2011
- I AM RANDOM WORDBOT! FE sproiiiing CLANK CLANK CLANK CLANK CLANK ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Oct 16 '11 11:33 (UTC)
- Keep. I think this is actually pretty good. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 11:54, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah... -- 16:31, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep if this is not a page that looks like the things they look like about, despite its not in that category, it will be huffed instantly.--
FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 10:26, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep It's not very original though. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:46, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
- The point of the article held up well... --Gamma287 11:28, October 19, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Same as below. Decent idea but comes of too much as one of the articles it's ripping. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:03, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Lovely. Kill it though. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:05, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- My dog crapped out something way funnier than this.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 08:13, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. It's filled with a bunch of cat randomness. I actually took the time to look over the article which meant I was either drunk or the article is horribly bad. This is the only article that gets away with randomness. --AlmightyGameDude 15:41, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Not unoriginal enough. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:10, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Well that sucked.--Nikau 06:16, October 18, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 13:35, 19 October 2011
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I kinda like this. It might need some more over-the-topness, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 07:59, 16 October 2011
- That's why I just moved it to my userspace. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 08:03, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (7) |
- I don't know if this is supposed to be one of those so-over-the-top-it's-funny pages, but it's not working. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:55, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Stick Stupid Man no wonder you're extinct--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 08:08, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- I AM RANDOM WORDBOT! FEAR ME, PUNY NON-METALOIDS! CHAIR UNDERPANTS WALK HOT-CROSS BUNS INTO OCTOBER FLEET DISHWASHER! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Oct 16 '11 11:29 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 11:51, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- its almost as bad as Frump(one of the crappy articles in theslyfox's userspace).--
FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 11:59, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. The Dilophosaurus article is a bad example for Uncyclopedia, as it is NOT funny! --AlmightyGameDude 15:44, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Ick. Not funny at all.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -8
|
Keep (8) |
- After all that work I did to make it look like the real thing? Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 18:47, 16 October 2011
- Strong keep. It's purely brilliant and unique (literally). If the article gets deleted, I shall resurrect it. --AlmightyGameDude 22:25, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- For some reason this is funny. I don't know why, there's certainly nothing to make it funny, it just is. -- 22:39, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I like it -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:45, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Pure epicness I ♥ this article. iHazTehGoodGrammerz --TalkyPage 01:50, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Strong Keep What's next? AAAAAAAAA! on VFD? -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 17 October 2011, at 03:54
- Lovely ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:01, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I see where you're going. Also, thanks Xamralco for fixing the other one. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:44, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (0) |
#Because it's pure novelty, and it makes no attempt to actually be funny (This page does not really exist does, for example. Can anyone fix that?) EpicAwesomeness (talk) 18:45, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- The fuck? EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:37, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 18:09, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. I think what User: EpicAwesomeness meant to say was, "Da fuck is dis shit, nigga?" As go's to all the black rappers, too. --AlmightyGameDude 22:30, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- FAILURE HAS ENSUED I demand deletion. TehGrammerNazi 02:20, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Crap rat. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 10:09, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
- Fcuk. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 13:06, October 17, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (8) |
- Why I oughta....why I WILL oughta! -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Some made me laugh, some made me vomit, and some made me vote Keep. Just burninate all the n00b edits and the Hitler references and this could actually be worth breathing near... --Gamma287 20:24, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
- No.--
FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 07:19, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Really weak keep The humour is based on randomness (i.e. "Karl eventually got adopted by Lady Gaga in episode 49: 'Karl's Last Ride'")and Mecha-Hitler humour. Some rewriting will do it good. But a likeable concept. A few inches away from a delete from me. -- PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 14 October 2011, at 01:22
- The best article on the internet. Aleister 17:52 14-10-'11
- I'm the guy who rewrote it to it's current state. If you don't like it as it is, try to rewrite it yourself! Seriously, see if anyone else wants to make it funny/tolerable/better before deleting it right away. So, keep for now. Maybe delete if no one can come up with anything to save it, and I've already tried. Seeing this one up for deletion does make one wonder how many cartoon/anime articles we really need here... --Just!n 22:28, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:17, 15 October 2011
- Keep. I love that show. 11:22, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Because the current version sucks and because my 16-17 year old self was heavily involved with the older version which is even worse (I was an even bigger faggot back then, if you can believe that). Blech. Ew. Go away. All of it. make it go away mommy. --Roman Dog Bird 09:01, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
- yeah you really liked this show didn't you -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 10:05, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Terrible way of parodying a good cartoon.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 17:31, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The random stuff is horrible and the not random stuff isn't funny. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:28, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 21:31, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry, but yeah. --Black Flamingo 00:14, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Bleah! Despite the fact that its subject has great potential for humor, this is totally unfunny... and it's 2005-cruft to boot. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:43 October 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:59, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 00:02, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- I AM RANDOM WORDBOT! FEAR ME MORTALS! PINEAPPLE KEY PEN ATOMIZE IMAC MOUSE BICYCLE CLOCK! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Oct 16 '11 11:17 (UTC)
- Delete. A freakin' disgrace. 11:24, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. The Chinese made the robot so Delete. --AlmightyGameDude 15:46, October 16, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Not funny. PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 15 October 2011, at 03:01
- Not funny. --Roman Dog Bird 03:04, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Not funny.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 04:08, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
- ynnuf toN. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:08, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. It seems that AlmightyGameDude was too sluggish and lethargic to appraisal the article so WTF, let’s just delete it! --AlmightyGameDude 15:25, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:02, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This article make for cultural learnings of Пријепоље for make benefit glorious nation of Srbija! Thanks to you! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 15 '11 5:09 (UTC)
- Ambivalent "Not funny." I love the concept, and I would hate to delete Borat's masterpiece essay... but the writing is just horrible. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 06:23 October 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (2) |
- Delete your colon?!? Delete your colon?!? Look, man, you need your gastrointestinal tract for transporting that cheeseburger you ate from your mouth to your butt. Your colon is an integral part of that system! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Oct 14 '11 10:15 (UTC)
- Also, wassap wit deleting my vote, SlyFox... ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Oct 14 '11 22:38 (UTC)
- An edit conflict that wasn't edit conflicted properly, probably. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:43, 14 October 2011
>_< ......... O_O
- Woah, that is just freaky. When I fixed Gamma's sort-of-unsigned vote, it also deleted Beever's "keep" vote here, in addition to Aleister's "delete" vote on "Fosters" below. One time during an edit conflict on this page, I had to add my forgotten signature in a second edit, but it ended up getting deleted and replaced with an "unsigned" template. So apparently this is a bug that occurs randomly. Certainly no vote rigging was intended, though I do apologize for not noticing what happened. This reminds me of the broken "tag" gadget that can add fix tags to articles, but deletes half of the existing text in the process... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 06:15 October 15, 2011 (UTC)
- It happens sometimes on this page. Something to do with editing sections. Come to think of it, it'd be a good reason to organize VFD more like VFH (every nom gets its own page). —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:18, 15 October 2011
- I agree with Socky. That would make things a whole much better.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 19:15, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Doesn't seem too bad. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:43, 14 October 2011
|
Delete (7) |
- Lame Seems more like something you can get off Wikipedia, and while there is an attempt at humor, it comes out as cheesy.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 00:51, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 01:11, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
- BUTTPOOP --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 03:45, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
- :::::::::: I'd like an article with that sprawled out across the page better... --Gamma287 10:06, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! Bleh. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 17:49 October 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:32, October 14, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 04:26, October 15, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Not even a chuckle. PLEB SIR Lollipop (TALK) - updated on 12 October 2011, at 23:56
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:00, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
- that is SOOOOOOOOOO 2005/2006 --Roman Dog Bird 01:12, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 01:49, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The sole emo joke strikes again. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:22, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Exterminate with a burning passion Someone just crossed the line.....--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 02:44, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep I don't think we should be messing around with an HTBFANJS subject. --- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 16:01, October 12, 2011 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Iwillkillyou333 (talk • contribs)
- Strongest possible keep possible. This is funny, even if it is stupid. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:34, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Stupid. -- 00:20, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. At worst, it's a harmless redirect. For the "it goes against the spirit of what it is", it's an example of metahumor that works very well. It's not going to be seen by a lot of people, especially people who might see it and go "Oh, I get it now" and suddenly understand a wider variety of humor than they did before, which is a shame. --monika 06:39, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Probably the first time anyone's put a redierect up for VFD, but it isn't really for QVFD and it's pointless. Putting a longcut on HTBFANJS isn't very useful given the page's aim, is it?--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:30, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Execution was poor, and plainly full of cruft and nonsense.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 18:29, October 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:35, October 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia, this is unacceptable. As an animal rights activist, and an Outstanding CitizenTM, this article offends me. My non-existent rights are being violated, et-cetera, et-cetera... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 22:48 October 11, 2011 (UTC)
- I think we should tell this article to get its traps and chattels together, and begone with itself. It is unfunny, sirs! ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Oct 12 '11 2:02 (UTC)
- This is dumber than the S.A.L.T. treaties... --Gamma287 02:12, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Yeah, did I miss something? --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 02:22, October 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 14:20, October 9, 2011 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! The Daleks wishes it.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 21:49, October 11, 2011 (UTC)
- four votes should be enough, right? come on, 94 hours and it's still up? --Roman Dog Bird 01:16, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Right before you delete the article, I want you all to read this, and then tell me which is worse. I vote the Wikipedia version. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Oct 12 '11 1:58 (UTC)
- Huh? What does that have to do with anything? We don't control Wikipedia. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 01:51, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
- Are you saying we should start the deletion process over at Wikipedia? --monika 06:49, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (2) |
- You know, I'm a DESTROY-ALL-THINGS sort of bloke, but I actually liked this article. Did you "DELETE" voters even read past the words "United Spades"? (I wouldn't hold it against you if you didn't; that part's a dumb, huffed joke.) The rest of the article ain't too horrible, even with the lack of pictures. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Wed, Oct 12 '11 1:53 (UTC)
- You know I'm a NEVER-AGREE-WITH-ANYTHING-BIZZEEBEEVER-SAYS sort of bloke, but I actually liked this article and would like to see if fixed up. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
|
Delete (6) |
- Obliterate. How did this escape ICU? -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:21, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Probably because nobody was paying attention. I wonder if the lack of votes is related? This is just random. And yeah, I'm not sure why I'm even bothering to vote at this point; this nomination's old enough to close, but... eh.
1234 ~ 21:46, 11 October 2011
Get rid of it. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 22:49 October 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, all right. My delete vote was rather weak, anyway. Since I have a certain aversion to making decisions, I am going to abstain. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 14:32 October 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It's evil--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 22:51, October 11, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I did read beyond "United Spades." --Gamma287 02:11, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Wikipedia injokery even worse than Uncyclopedia's. Nah. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:26, October 12, 2011 (UTC)
- Nah toogood -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:45, October 13, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
MESSAGE TO THE HIGH COMMANDERS If the article gets to the point of deletion, please move it to my userspace and notify me somehow. I am a VFD save virgin, but I want to try, so please go easy on me. Mattsnow 03:02, October 8, 2011 (UTC) Awww, forget it. Too many half finished articles on my userspace. Mattsnow 03:51, October 10, 2011 (UTC)
You might want to change the title to Wikipede, though. Unless you're planning on writing something that involves iPods or tripods. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:53, 8 October 2011 Ha, you should see my userspace. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 06:57, 10 October 2011
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (2) |
- All is not yet lost. I agree with Sloublues...--ThecoolxavierguyfromghIII 21:59, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
- I like it. It's unpolished and could do with expansion, but as it stands, the point is clear and there are enough details to escape
dwarf planet stub classification. --Sloublues 17:38, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- What the hell? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:25, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:35, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Actually, an article with those pictures could work as the opposite version of the planet where Windows backgrounds come from. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:40, 7 October 2011
- Kept. I have no idea if this is because it's actually not that bad, or just because only four people bothered to vote, though.
1234 ~ 21:48, 11 October 2011
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (7) |
- Keep. Anyone who nominates BFI is (too easy). But this page has been pretty well destroyed by edits, so maybe go back in the history and find a point where it was really bat fuck insane. Aleister 17:04 7-10-'11
- Keep. Epic's cleanup made it keepable, ironically enough. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:33, 7 October 2011
- Keep. This article is bat fuck insane. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:04, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
- keep mAttlobster. (hello) 00:56, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. This kind of article appeals to younger users, and is not that bad at all. Mattsnow 03:05, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Revert it to the previous version. Its longer.--
FcukmanLOOS3R!!! 09:56, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Being longer doesn't make it better. A three hour long Disaster Movie is way worse than normal Disaster Movie (and would probably kill you). Likewise, big fat Bat Fuck Insane is, and even weathered Uncyclopedians will admit it, a steaming pile of shit. I'm sorry IPs but it is. I tried to find a decent version and slim it down to funny. Although the big one is more classable under "Bat Fuck Insane", it is indeed useless. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:25, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, I agree with EpicAwesomeness on this one. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 17:33, 8 October 2011
- Keep. Per it being an in-joke. Also, the truckload of redlinks that deleting this page will create won't be any help to our new members. If nothing else, it should be kept for archival purposes. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 11:49 October 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- In retrospect , I can see why this will backfire immediately. I will, however, point a few things out. It's not funny. Seriously, finding this funny is probably a bad thing. It's absolutely stupid. Pretty self-explanitory. It looks horrible. I'm a big supporter of nice formatting and whatnot, and this just makes me cringe. Do we really need it? Well? Do we? --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:01, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
- So, I stole an earlier version and cleaned it up a bit. I'm still not voting keep though. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 18:42, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
- EpicAwesomeness, you so bat fuck insane. Aleister 18:52 7-20-'11
- I'm with Epic. This could be a decent concept, if the prose were actually bat-fuck insane. Instead, it's just contrived-sounding random nonsense. I should know -- according to Skizzers, I'm an expert on contrived-sounding nonsense. Let this be a wake-up call to someone to actually fix the page up. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Fri, Oct 7 '11 23:25 (UTC)
- Get the fuck out. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:15, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 20:45, 8 October 2011
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Because--ThecoolxavierguyfromghIII 02:28, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Die. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:04, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Duns Scrotus. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:38, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 23:33, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I'm sure Bizzeebeever can make a gem out of this classic movie, and I'd love to help. Mattsnow 03:17, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Unleash the beever! mAttlobster. (hello) 09:04, October 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Hold up, hold up! Yes, this is Random Stupit. But I've decided to rewrite it for Halloween. If it DOES get deleted, can you please move it to my userspace? 'k thx bai. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sat, Oct 8 '11 2:00 (UTC)
Kept. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:38, 8 October 2011
- Whoops, um... Moved to Bizzeebeever's userspace. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:40, 8 October 2011
- In the meantime until it's been rewritten, I thought a nice redirect would keep IPs away. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 11:43 October 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Ah, wonderful. That allows me to use {{VFDc}} again. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:50, 8 October 2011
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (6) |
- I love frog semen. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Good enough. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 15:25, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
- oh, wow --Roman Dog Bird 03:36, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Lovely. A work of art. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:39, October 5, 2011 (UTC)
- If TKF wants to sprew his semen all around the site, who are we to tell him "No!" Give the frog a break. Aleister 15:36 7-10-'11
- Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:14, 7 October 2011
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Rubbish. 'Nuff said. --Scofield & Friends 13:47, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Weak Delete -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 21:02, October 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! Not a good choice of bodily fluid to base an article on. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 19:04 October 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems a bit of a one-liner idea to me. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 15:34, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Rewrote, expanded. Really think it's keepable now. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 18:02, October 7, 2011 (UTC)
1234 ~ 19:00, 7 October 2011
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Tis' a a dark and terrible place... and this makes parody of it reasonably well. Listyness is best tackled with time spent on an article, rather than deletions.--Sycamore (Talk) 18:03, October 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Kelp List can become article with ease. Some of it is funny anyway. --Nikau 05:38, October 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. This article has just won the Nobel Prize for Literature, how can it be deleted??? Aleister15:15 7-10-'11
|
Delete (3) |
- What isn't list is random and shit. Boy, are British supermarket articles bad. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 09:40, October 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Asda whether this is Tesco. My Lidl point is we should Sainsbury this article. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:47, October 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 12:21, October 2, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 18:59, 7 October 2011
|