This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
Yet another example of Articles that exist, but shouldn't. We really should make that into an article. It would have a massive list of all the actual attempts at these "Don't exist, but should"s, with one liners about why they were deleted. Or, better yet, Delete. ~ Talk 16:20, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
HILARIOUS AND CREATIVE --Roman Dog Bird 18:02, July 13, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. I made this a few years a ago to keep track of the places in Scotland. It still does this today; so perhaps moving it to a sub-page of Scotland would be a better place for it?--Sycamore(Talk) 17:00, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
Sub-page it. That works. It doesn't really work as a standalone article, but it could be useful if tucked away in a small alley of Scotland. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.05:12 July 13, 2011 (UTC)
Umm... This unfunny article reads like an afterthought to that image of the girl looking at the... whatever it is (which is just wrong on so many levels). But since the picture is safely embedded in other articles, I think it's safe to toast this one. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.05:04 July 13, 2011 (UTC)
Coulda swore we already deleted this, like, last month. Guys gotta stop trying to write this article, it ain't workin --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:32, July 12, 2011 (UTC)
I dunno, it makes sense to me. It's about a "get rich quick" scam that makes its money off "sellers" who are required to buy stuff they can't sell. These are definitely real. A relative of mine almost fell for one of these, and a friend of mine lost her shirt to the same scam. I just don't know if it's appropriate for Uncyc--this is actually more fact than fiction. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.21:58 July 11, 2011 (UTC)
Wikia has been receiving complaints about how offensive this article is. It's also not very well written. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 19:43, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
The greatest band ever, started in 6 B.C., and rumors of subliminal messages abound. Original. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 21:15 Jul 11, 2011
"They actually rocked so hard that the drummer exploded... causing a mass riot in the audience from people trying to catch all the flying bits." ........ -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.22:06 July 11, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Old crufty article about stuff everybody already knows about. As for writing anything funny about it, the hilarious truth of the matter is impossible to parody. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.21:38 July 11, 2011 (UTC)
It's an inverse of the Wikipedia page, making most of the content rather unoriginal, and it doesn't even provide a good list of crap topics for BGBU. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 22:10 Jul 09, 2011
Delete. Another list of things that don't exist. Some of the pictures are worth keeping, though. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.16:59 July 11, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Failed feature I thought it'd be better off here. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 21:38, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. This is a compilation of stuff you can find by searching for "fun things to do at WalMart". Anything original is buried among the plagiarism. --Sloublues 23:00, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
searching on the Internet, that is. --Sloublues 23:02, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
DELETE. It goes to say what is good content for other websites is trash for Uncy. We're incredible. Mattsnow 03:55, July 11, 2011 (UTC)
Eww!!!! 2005-cruft at its very worst. You may fire when ready.Commence primary ignition! -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.17:39 July 11, 2011 (UTC)
I've been waiting for the Exodus to be finished so I could delete this. Funny title, just not a high quality set of gears inside. The images are badly photoshopped too. --Gamma287 17:14, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
Tis' an oddity that I vote keep a nomination. Just de-randomize the article and remove the Nazi stuff, and I won't change my vote. Nazi jokes are just bad. Spellchecking helps too... --Gamma287 21:42, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. The joke of the article is that Jasper is a minor character in the Simpsons, and he has an article. While other characters don't have articles. --Lollipop-CONTRIBS-WRITINGS-SHOP-Now adopting! - 22:09, 9 July 2011
Deleted by monthly things, but some people missed it, so now it's here. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:40, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
It's funny for the first eighteen seconds (thirty-six if you're, err, impaired), then it's just incredibly strenuous and boring. Okay, maybe the first five seconds... --Gamma287 17:07, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
This would be better off at ED. The article's single joke, buried in the middle, is "seeders good, leechers bad". –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 21:21 Jul 08, 2011
EXTERMINATE! Daaaamn. I'm getting tired of all these haters. I'm no fan of the dude but this a comedy site not a hate site. Also full of cruft, randomness, and shit like that--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 04:18, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Keep. Around here, an {{Expand}} template is a death sentence. Slap a hard rewrite tag on it. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN)Talk here. 22:09, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
It's not! It's not!! I don't usually look at the article's history until after I've decided it's VFD material! Then I glance at it to make sure it hasn't been vandalized. It's not you! It's the words you put on this article. And the order they're in. But not you. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 21:53 Jul 08, 2011
You seem to think that articles have to be well-written or funny or have some other redeeming value. This is a backward position to take. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:58, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
Sorry for being a pessimist... --Gamma287 01:05, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
I hate these types of articles... --Gamma287 00:08, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Haven't seen anything like this before. Oh. Wait. ~ Talk 03:52, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
It's about some sports dude who did some stuff and happens to be buried under a toilet... How original. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.04:50 July 9, 2011 (UTC)
If someone asked you "What did Uncyclopedia look like in 2006?" you could link them this article. Oscar Wilde, self-contradictory, random dates, general stupidity. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 21:24 Jul 08, 2011
Google translation: "Does not meet the Chinese national requirements for funny articles." Nice! -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.06:19 July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. An article about image file formats with NO ACTUAL IMAGES! Unless you count the stick figures at the bottom. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN)Talk here. 22:21, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. I have more of these dumb lists, I will be listing them as soon some older votes end. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 08:39, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. There are such things as good lists. This isn't one.--EpicAwesomeness(talk) 09:54, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. by listing the names, the names are no longer non-existent, but merely unused. Therefore, to protect the humor in pub names that should exist but don't, this article should be deleted. --Mn-z 12:06, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Not feeling merciful anymore. Plus, I hate these articles... --Gamma287 21:48, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
I know, let's make up a bunch of pub names based on animals, fruits and vegies, body parts, mythical animals, sports, historical figures, and other miscellania, and call it an article. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN)Talk here. 23:14, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Metioing the Busch Administration in an article like this is just stupid. Stupid Democrat.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 14:05, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Random and totally unrelated to the movie. Also, short and stubbish. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN)Talk here. 23:22, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Not good. Not good at all... --Gamma287 01:16, July 10, 2011 (UTC)
I don't know if this article is bad enough to be axed, but I am confident that a movie titled There's Just Something About Your Nostrils could be awesome. --Sloublues 16:41, July 9, 2011 (UTC)
Strong keep. Yes, it's awful, but it's an in-joke, and to delete it would mess with the continuity of the site. How many articles link to this? If we redirect it to something else those links won't make any sense. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.16:04 July 6, 2011 (UTC)
Keep for some obscure reason that has to do with helping worthless editors feel good. Nah, I'm just messin'. Kill.–SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 05:10 Jul 06, 2011
In a sense, but not really. It's an in-joke about something outside of Uncyclopedia rather than something within Uncyclopedia. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings• SU&W) 16:54 Jul 06, 2011
The joke is that people always vote to keep it on VFD for no reason. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 05:08, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
Strong keep - this is important to other feature articles, and deleting it would mess those articles up.- What's the good in doing that??-Funnybony 23:17, Jul 5
In other news today, something not at all related to Sonic the Hedgehog has made its way to VFD. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.09:27 July 7, 2011 (UTC)
It seems it's almost done. Now, what of the other two Sonic articles? --Gamma287 04:51, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
I can't bring myself to vote "Delete" on something that had such a good concept. Alas, it will likely never be more than wasted potential. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.09:33 July 7, 2011 (UTC)
I completely agree--Xamralco 23:47, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
I feel iffy about votin to delete it since I reviewed this and thought it had a good future. Unless someone gives me a reason to vote delete on it--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 03:37, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
Delete ALL Sonic-related articles. There's a folder full somewhere... --Gamma287 05:34, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. The article on wikipedia is equally abysmal. Perhaps this one and theirs could be merged and no one will know the difference except Sonic fans. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:44, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
So much text there. Too bad there's no content. ~ Talk 05:08, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Another article that can be deposited, unwrapped in Junior Uncyclopedia's waste disposal unit (a black plastic bag). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:06, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
Well now that I know that you're the one who (mostly) wrote what I just deleted, yeah, it was deleted previously. Four years ago. And it apparently only had eleven edits. So what's your point? --Roman Dog Bird 03:16, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
I'm just surprised that it managed to scrape by not getting deleted the first time, only to go up in flames now. That's all. Oh, well.--Yoyoddd 03:28, July 8, 2011 (UTC)
Sonic produces memes. Memes produce IP addresses (most cases). IP addresses produce vandalism. Vandalism makes the admins. angry... KILLIT! KILLIT NOW!!!--Gamma287 05:30, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. Gives other, underpowered hedgehogs a bad name. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:01, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
"I'll have a... Meh." I've never played the game, but I can't say it sounds any better than its Uncyc article. If it's really this bad, I pity the unfortunate souls who payed good money for it. -- Sir"TheSlyPony"Invariably certifiable.09:06 July 7, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. What's with all these awful Sonic articles?--Xamralco 23:52, July 7, 2011 (UTC)
Delete. This article looks like the results of a crazy old lady and her floating kingdom/lavos who is really just a giant misunderstood grub that wanted to be a porcupine. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK]17:03 Jul 6 2011
Scrap it and rewrite from scratch. And probably protect it from recreation by IPs. Alas, could find no better version in the page history. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN)Talk here. 21:35, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
So much potential and so little execution. Get rid of it so someone else won't be deterred from making one that's less shitty. ~ Talk 05:05, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
ahh dnt feal liek spelig rigt... --Gamma287 05:27, July 7, 2011 (UTC)