From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- An article almost as awful as its subject. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:01 Jul 05, 2011
- Delete. What?--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 20:15, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2011
- What COBOL? --Gamma287 01:37, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
- De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 17:01 Jul 6 2011
- Delete. ~ Talk 04:55, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Oh my, I remember taking a class on COBOL in college. I found this article mildly amusing but probably not suitable for mainspace, so I copied it to my userspace. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:39, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Putting it to a vote instead of doing the honors myself. ~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk]
- Delete. Too short and random.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 18:34, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 18:55, 5 July 2011
- Radioactive! --Gamma287 19:12, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! It starts out good, but quickly descends into irredeemable randomness. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 20:08 July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Redirect to that article about ponies by Dexter. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:15, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I got past the picture before deciding. But not by much. ~ Talk 04:49, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- It's kinda really shitty, but somehow I feel others might disagree. ~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk]
- Delete. Uh no.--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 18:35, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 18:55, 5 July 2011
- Per, err, never mind. Delete. --Gamma287 19:15, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- C4. It needs to go away. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 19:18 July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ Talk 04:47, 7 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- And this, should we keep this?
1234 ~ 08:18, 5 July 2011
- No (talk) 08:43, 5 July 2011
- Delete. Unless there is a Madonna in the house willing to adopt it, this should go-go. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:22, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- DETONATE!! lol wut? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 13:33 July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ Talk 17:08, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Uh, what the hell did I just read?--- TALK What's it like to be a heretic? 18:36, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Shove the cat in the hat, put the hat in a bag and tie, then throw the bag in the river. --Gamma287 18:51, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- This has an expired fix. Is it worth keeping? Based on the article, I couldn't even figure out what it was.
1234 ~ 08:15, 5 July 2011
- No (talk) 08:43, 5 July 2011
- Delete. User 'Nacky' has long gone so I doubt if any other contributor will want to build on this. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:14, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- ??? It has to be about something... Good luck figuring out what it is, though. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 13:06 July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Sometimes, these get too tedious to finish. Now I see the importance of images... --Gamma287 19:17, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This is presumably about the TV show The 4400. I've never watched it, so I can't tell how spot-on this article is. I don't see much humor in the parts of the article I skim, though. --Sloublues 13:18, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. I remember seeing this on VFD quite some time ago, and it was kept, perhaps for good reason. This page needs cleanup, not deletion. --Scofield & Dudes 10:58, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I dunno. Normally, I would vote to get rid of this (in fact, I had a really nice joke about Badger Badger Badger already typed up for it), but Aleister made a good point in the previous nom. Besides, I think this version looks more polished than the old VFD'd version, which isn't very old. I say revert to a previous version and protect from IPs--and somebody who knows anything at all about the subject should decruft it post-haste (I think it's about a porcupine and a badger with multiple tails or something). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 13:28 July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Not like it's gonna matter, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 19:03, 5 July 2011
|
Delete (9) |
- Delete. The title is a dead give away that this is another shitty list, but its not funny and poorly formatted at best. So yeah fuck this ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 02:51, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh ugh -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 03:10, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Plan 9 from Outer Space... ...is better than this. --Gamma287 03:36, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 03:54, 5 July 2011
- Delete. ~ Talk 04:51, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. An article that thankfully fully flags its crap content well in advance. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:16, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Lacking subject, lacking approach, lacking writing style; just generally lacking.
1234 ~ 15:38, 5 July 2011
- Kerkill There is nothing remotely worth keeping about this. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 16:56 Jul 05, 2011
- Not want -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:14, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. You know you want to... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Keep. I lol'd ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:36, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (7) |
- I don't really know what the hell this is. I thought someone might want to save it.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 02:09, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Nope. (talk) 02:33, 5 July 2011
- Fails spectacularly to live up to the awesome title -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:34, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Punny title. Too bad the article sucked. ~ Talk 04:50, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Merge the one line joke with the existing Descartes article? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:19, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- What Romartus said.
1234 ~ 15:42, 5 July 2011
- --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 19:59, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Article has evolved significantly since voting, this vote is thus invalidated; re-submit if you feel it's still huffable. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 08:37, July 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Eh, who cares -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:33, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Per above ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:56, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Duh. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:06, 5 July 2011
|
Delete (3) |
- Originally doomed by an expired vanity tag, this article's deletion has been contested by its author, so instead I bring it here. I still hold that this is vanity, vanity, vanity, and not even an in-joke, but the article of an in-joke. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 22:25 Jul 03, 2011
- !DED! --Gamma287 03:57, July 5, 2011 (UTC)
- What for? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by XDshempXD (talk • contribs)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. OP is being a whiney fag. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 20:45, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I mean, it's ain't great. But it ain't atrocious either. Needs love. ~ Talk 01:20, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I've seen worse. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:57, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Skully reverted someone blanking this page. If Skully had bothered actually reading it, though, he would've realized reverting anything at all would be a pure waste of time. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:35, 30 June 2011
- Per above. To the Gulag! --Gamma287 20:49, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Sanitize. Needs decontamination. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:26 July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- What Socky said, but not in a hilarious Belgian accent. --Black Flamingo 22:42, July 3, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1234 ~ 08:17, 5 July 2011
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- Weakling of a keep. Some pics captions are not so bad, and that's the kind of article that would appeal to younger lads (like 12) so... Mattsnow 03:58, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Could use some more text, but it has some value, I think. ~ Talk 14:58, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
- Heh -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:43, July 4, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Expired tag - worth keeping? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 23:29 Jul 03, 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (6) |
- Obvious Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 06:45, 1 July 2011
- Keep. looks like what it is about. --Mn-z 14:25, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Not being able to understand a joke is not the best reason to delete it. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:55, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Per above useres. --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 19:04, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Hurr (talk) 21:01, 1 July 2011
- <Insert some humorous redirect related keep reason here> -- 03:29, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- I don't get it ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:43, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- I get it, but I still think it's useless. --Gamma287 00:08, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- A deletion survivor, but I really can't find anything in there that should justifiably exist. --Black Flamingo 02:39, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Whoa! The start wasn't that bad, but the formatting nightmare at the end... Did someone put the ICU on that thing to warn the author? Delete if there were no answer. Mattsnow 02:45, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
- KILLIT! --Gamma287 02:46, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh (talk) 06:29, 2 July 2011
- *vomits up his intestines* --Roman Dog Bird 19:01, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- IPs are destroying this article, and I don't think it can recover, since it is mostly IP
written vandalized. I'll finish my rewrite sooner or later. --Gamma287 23:59, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Didn't seem so bad at first, but it did get pretty tiresome. --Black Flamingo 02:39, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
- As per BF. Some fuck-ups in the first few sections, I have nothing against a list when needed, but not like this. Mattsnow 02:50, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Roman Dog Bird 04:13, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Lists. ~ Talk 17:31, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Can we create protect this from IP adresses too? They got really mad when I nominated this (and it's pretty funny too). --Gamma287 18:12, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- *sigh* unfunny and based on something unfunny. (talk) 23:10, 1 July 2011
- Delete. Opposite of Kitten Huffing. Shimazu | Chat with me! | What I have done | My Homeland | A sad conflict | AA AAAAAAAA AAAA 23:36, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Puppy Huffing is toxic. --Gamma287 00:09, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
- I would sleep better at night knowing that this practice was abolished. Pup 12:28 02 Jul '11
- Delete. I like pissing my time away reading from top-to-bottom an article that people say sucks. Kind of a "Don't do that" thing or "Don't be sad, there are worse than your articles." This is one of these instances. Mattsnow 02:41, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! I actually really like the original kitten huffing, but man, this thing sucks. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 02:32 July 3, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Feed it to the grues. This seems pretty bad. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:59, 1 July 2011
- Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 22:47, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Feed Socky to the grues (talk) 23:03, 1 July 2011
- Yes, please. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:13, 1 July 2011
- Give the grues to the Iranians. --Gamma287 00:05, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Yawn. ~ Talk 17:28, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The concept is decent, but the execution is horrible. It might work if someone extended the scientist's thoughts on each of four days instead of having several days with just one-liners. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 02:36 July 3, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Say what? Also, maybe we should reconsider some of our Featured UnBooks, just possibly maybe. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 19:29 Jul 01, 2011
- Agreed. (talk) 20:57, 1 July 2011
- Bah. --Black Flamingo 02:43, July 2, 2011 (UTC)
- Per BlackFlamingo. ~ Talk 17:26, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. per being mainspaced by the Jew or something!! --Mn-z 23:23, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. poetry 23:54, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (9) |
- Delete. A Stub, a shameless theme copypasta and not at all funny either. -- Prof. Olipro KUN (W)Anchor Op Bur. (Harass) 19:21, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- This is gayer than Mr. Winkler. -crowd boos-- --Gamma287 20:01, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- yettie wrote it and mordillo mainspaced it what the fuck --Roman Dog Bird 20:05, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- VFD: a webpage giving away free nominations in return for a) crappy articles b) referring freinds to do the same – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:06 Jun 30, 2011
- Yes.
1234 ~ 23:14, 30 June 2011
- Yawn. ~ Talk 01:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This rabbit has the runs. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:25, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Mordillo may have mainspaced it, but it's still a mess. He's not really around anymore to share his opinion, so it probably doesn't make any difference now. Yettie hasn't been around for a while, either. I do wish we could stop losing good people... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:24 July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- If you want to summon Yettie, all you need to do is edit his talkpage. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:33, 1 July 2011
- Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 22:44, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Actually, on my screen, the search box is in the almost exact opposite direction as the arrow is pointing...
1234 ~ 15:04, 30 June 2011
- Least informative article ever. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:07 Jun 30, 2011
- KILLIT!!! KILLIT NOW!!! --Gamma287 20:09, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- If someone changed the graphic to point in the right direction, I'd change my vote. But I'm way too lazy to do the work myself. ~ Talk 01:17, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:26, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! It's up there! (see comment) -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:05 July 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- This had some lovely template evasion in 2006. Beyond that, there's nothing interesting here.
1234 ~ 11:29, 30 June 2011
- NRV. Pup 11:56 30 Jun '11
- DEAD. --Gamma287 20:03, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Template evasion, how I shall miss thee... not. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 20:08 Jun 30, 2011
- Delete. ~ Talk 01:16, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Not only is non-notable, it's just another "My hometown sucks" article. I feel sorry for so many people who hate where they live. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:30 July 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Just not funny... and also poor and abandoned and ripe for making... ah, disappear. But I never said that.
1234 ~ 11:13, 30 June 2011
- Delete. The English translation of the deleted French page. Pup 12:22 30 Jun '11
- Obliterate. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:23, 30 June 2011
- --Gamma287 20:05, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. ~ Talk 01:14, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
- DETONATE!! I almost VFD'd this a few months ago, but decided against it when I saw it was from the French Uncyc (I thought those were somehow protected). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:22 July 1, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Certainly not funny in English either. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:28, July 1, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Did a little playing with the code and while it's not identical in output gives a similar result, and allows for partial increases. (1 < 1.5 < 2). <big> is not supported by HTML 5. This now will work in pure CSS 3 and HTML 5 now. Pup 11:50 30 Jun '11
|
Delete (5) |
- This uses a font tag and according to Spang, won't work using non-deprecated tags. Seeing as font isn't technically supported anymore, we should probably do something with this so people quit using it. On that note, anyone have a better idea than just deleting it? Because that was my best one.
1234 ~ 08:06, 30 June 2011
- Wow, this is stupid. Learn how to style, people. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 08:10 Jun 30, 2011
- Delete. Provided a bot can fix up the close to 1,000 uses of this template. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:16, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:48, 30 June 2011
- Delete. on condition that somebody replace this template with correct code. --Mn-z 23:25, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. This wouldn't be the same <big> tag that is still widely in use, would it? I'm confused... I can't figure out what {{Big}} actually does. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 10:45 June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- <big> still works. See? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:48, 30 June 2011
- This is transcluded in a lot of pages, albeit mostly user talk pages, forums, and userspace pages. Including, admittedly, about 40 of mine. If we're deleting the template then I'd suggest changing every page that it's transcluded on. Pup 11:54 30 Jun '11
- I'm arbitrarily declaring that PotR deleted this and this case is closed.
1234 ~ 09:15, 1 July 2011
|
Score: 2
|
Keep (5) |
- In userspace usage. If you check the "what links here," there are several userpages that have this template on them. I agree that it is pointless for articles, but userspace cruft never hurt anyone--at least not that I've heard of. Maybe it should be sent to the author's userspace, de-categorized and redirected from there. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 02:06 June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I lol'd and userspace it ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:16, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- userspace -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 10:07, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Very useful template. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:50, 30 June 2011
- Keep What use is something on Uncyclopedia is not really the point. What is the point? There isn't one - which is the point, which therefore sort of means there is. You get my point though don't you? Oh fuck off. mAttlobster. (hello) 11:49, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. Do we actually need a template that tells us there are too many templates on a page? I mean, yes, it's self-aware and all, but still. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 17:24 Jun 28, 2011
- Instead of adding a template to tell other people to remove some templates people could... I dunno, remove some templates?
1234 ~ 17:27, 28 June 2011
- Delete. (talk) 20:40, 28 June 2011
- I've only seen this on ONE userpage. Ever. Euthanize it. --Gamma287 21:22, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Its a unfunny joke. Shimazu | Chat with me! | What I have done | My Homeland | A sad conflict | AA AAAAAAAA AAAA 11:01, June 29, 2011
- Delete. colored box of canned humor. --Mn-z 02:10, June 30, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I hate this template with a passion. It practically encourages users to continue adding nonsensical templates. Every use I've ever seen use of this is a page that looks like it's been vandalised. Pup 12:00 30 Jun '11
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Came across this glittering turd while I was doing a little housework (Bonner) (Talk) Jun 28, 10:12
- Naw, JFK's livin' with Elvis, and Hitler's head is in a jar... --Gamma287 21:21, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Bye bye. --Black Flamingo 21:55, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
- So who killed JFK? Let's see: Hitler, Mr. Potato Head, Ronald McDonald and the Enterprise NX-01 all did it together... Is it just me, or did we already know this? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 06:56 June 29, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Just...what? (talk) 01:52, 28 June 2011
- this is a disgrace --Roman Dog Bird 04:57, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
- I thought this was why we had QA...
1234 ~ 09:41, 28 June 2011
- Killit -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:48, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Let this badly formatted nonsense (bad joke ahead) chase the mouse into the metaphorical fold-out ironing board. --Gamma287 21:19, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Too bad, Tom and Jerry could be the subject of a great article. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 03:49, June 29 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This is awful. Awful awful awful. Not one single redeeming line in the whole thing. It sounds like someone read our HowTos and tried to follow the formula, but failed miserably at every turn. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 17:49 Jun 27, 2011
- Pulverize and don't look back. Also, lists. ~ Talk 17:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 18:22, 27 June 2011
- good golly miss molly --Roman Dog Bird 01:20, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:48, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment.This was one of the last articles Zana Dark was working on to improve before she got the ban. So now we'll never know if it was salvageable. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:37, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete I'm thinking of writing a page on the two Ronaldos (and how they are really the same player) so I'd like it if turds like this were cleared away. 15:52, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. I hate this kind of blatant "fat people are fat and ghey" type stuff. Shoot on sight. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 16:06 June 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Seconded. Or thirded. But "thirded" sounds dumb and a bit like "turd," which brings us back to this article. ~ Talk 16:30, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 18:23, 27 June 2011
- Delete. Usually, I QVFD my bad ideas, like euthanizing a puppy. --Gamma287 21:17, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Burninate! Utter nonsense from a single contributor about one of Hitler's cronies. I don't have enough knowledge or interest in the subject to write about it, so I tagged this for a rewrite a few months ago. Nobody's touched it, so I think it might just be one of those subjects where nearly every attempt to parody it falls flat. Thus, I say we put it out of its misery. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 06:01 June 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Yep. --Gamma287 06:08, June 27, 2011 (UTC)
- -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 07:01, June 28, 2011 (UTC)
- And it looked so sensible from an aesthetic end. Well, relatively speaking.
1234 ~ 09:40, 28 June 2011
|
Comments |
|