Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion/Archive-2014-10

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.

Worst 100 Songs Referencing Paedophilia H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. A catalog rather than humor. Includes songs obviously about pedophilia, songs that are not but could be construed so, songs about sex under the age of majority but above the age of consent, songs about puppy-love, and songs with none of the above. Some items are accompanied by a quip or wisecrack, some are not, none have well-developed original humor. The page is about the joy of lechery (and "paedophilia" as meme) rather than the joy of writing comedy. Spıke Ѧ 18:07 1-Oct-14
  2. Seems to mainly be written in order to make a point. The point falls flat anyhow. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 22:13 1 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Anton (talk) 06:36, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
  4. How will I know what to listen to without it! --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent OZ! Noobaward.jpg Wotm.jpg Unbooks mousepad.PNG GUN.png 12:36, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol Burninate vote.png Burninate!  --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:11, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 Battle of the Somme H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Replace b.svg Replace. with User:Bathouse/The Battle of the Somme, which is an a lot better article. Anton (talk) 16:13, October 3, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Replace b.svg Replace. Spıke Ѧ 16:37 3-Oct-14
  3. Replace b.svg Replace. This is nonsensical wacky junk. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:59, October 3, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Both articles are fairly random, but the existing one is more so. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 23:27 3 October 2014
  5. Replace b.svg Replace. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:13, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 Rasta Jesus H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: -1 • voting closed
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Precious little to do with anything. Like the pic though. I guess that came from elsewhere? --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:28, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The re-write still isn't a very good improvement. ConCass2 (talk) 19:38, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
  • Do we really need an article on this? There seems to be nothing useful here, no concept or anything. We have plenty of Jesii already. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:37 29 September 2014 (formerly nominator)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg "Shit (literal shit)." I have no problem with the existence of the article, as it can be found with the Jesii nav-template. But this article starts with a fanboy tone, stops for a moment at the assertion that non-separatism is racist (which now in the US, I find serious and unfunny), and ends in history-of-the-future and lists. Bottom line, after the useful concept of a Rastafarian Christ, authors have nothing they actually want to say about him. Spıke Ѧ 00:43 29-Sep-14
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Rewritten. Not long enough, but it does finally have a comedy strategy rather than just eight years of vandalism. Spıke Ѧ 19:28 3-Oct-14
  2. Seems ok now. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 21:49 3 October 2014
  3. Good enough. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 03:54, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Trailer Park Boys H D Tag article

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. No redeeming qualities; the subject must have been funnier than this listcrufty report on it. Spıke Ѧ 20:47 29-Sep-14
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Listing badly but take that away, there would be very little left. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:24, September 29, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Being really fucking awesome. Its a serious crime. Dont fuck with them. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 22:34 29 September 2014
  4. Oh good. Tons of lists with no content. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:07, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. A series of stupid lists, insufficient remaining content to survive. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:00, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Empire: Total War H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Aside from the overuse of strikethrough and Censored, this article is full of exact dates and links to data on external websites. It was surely written not to amuse but to record the history of this game and certain gamers' gripes against the manufacturers and their difficult implementations. Spıke Ѧ 22:48 30-Sep-14
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Yawn! Simply a huge collection of fact, rather than humour and, as Spike says, is just a massive rant. ConCass2 (talk) 06:37, October 1, 2014 (UTC)
  3. So boring I barely read past the intro. I'm just going to assume the whole thing is like that. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 22:12 1 October 2014
  4. And it just drags on and on and on... --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:09, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Listy, ranty, more a catalog of drama between the game developers and angry ex-gamers. Get rid. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 03:51, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Symbol comment vote.svg Comment. May be just an edit of the 'redacted' crap stuff. I don't mind doing for now. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:01, October 3, 2014 (UTC)

Worst 100 Sexual Perversions H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Didn't find anything funny there. Anton (talk) 06:34, October 2, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Formula: Take anyone or anything, imagine humping it, append "-philia" and create a new disease. It would be an improvement if the article did this only 100 times. Spıke Ѧ 11:15 2-Oct-14
  3. Random sex cruft. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 23:07 3 October 2014
  4. Cruftphilia. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:12, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Epic. Fail. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 03:38, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Jesii H D

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg "Sometimes spelled "Jesi" by morons." A list of people who are not Jesus — but have nothing to do with him either. Spıke Ѧ 15:28 3-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Latest lame llama of an article. Shoot it and feed the kids. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:04, October 3, 2014 (UTC)
  3. If this somehow tied together our existing Jesus articles and had a funny concept, it might be worthwhile. However, it does neither. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 23:10 3 October 2014
  4. Redirect to Jesus --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:13, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Perhaps replace with a disambiguation page to the various Jesus articles. Capt. Gull (talk) 01:11, October 7, 2014 (UTC)
    I'm not worried at the general encyclopedia reader calling for an article on the (irregular) plural of Jesus, as we have three navigation templates to do the job. Spıke Ѧ 01:21 7-Oct-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Hamsterdam H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Nuclear Explosion Seal.PNG Obliterate. I noticed this article because an anon blanked a huge section but when I checked it, I found that it sucked monumentally always. So yeah. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:12, October 5, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg de dah dee dah dah dah doh, doh. The page with the pun title has: This pun, Darth Hitler, and then lists. Spıke Ѧ 02:26 5-Oct-14
  3. Kill it for sparkling in public. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 04:00 5 October 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Clog it--Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 20:31, October 6, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The article's talk page sums it up better than I could. Capt. Gull (talk) 01:07, October 7, 2014 (UTC)
    To-wit: "this page sucks get a life ho m0" Spıke Ѧ 01:18 7-Oct-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 Trigonometry H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: -3 • voting closed
Delete (0)
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Rewritten. Spıke Ѧ 22:45 7-Oct-14
  2. Trigonometry deserves an article all its own. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 23:33 7 October 2014
  3. Cool. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 00:06, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Gerbilism H Archive

Score: 6 • voting closed
Delete (6)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. This is pretty awful. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:50, October 7, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Creates a fake "ism" and conducts a short and very poor-quality ramble. Spıke Ѧ 18:15 7-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg enlightenment be in his ass. You just had to make it into a poop joke, didn't you? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 22:32 7 October 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. ugh. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 11:36, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. There is a joke here, and it's even a "natural" poop joke, but it's so obscure that nobody's going to get it, IMHO, and it's so dumb that anyone who gets it isn't going to laugh anyway. If you're feeling in the mood to be kinda grossed out and you want to know where it came from look up Gerbilling on Wikipedia. (The clue that it's not all just randomness is the claim that the article was sporked from Wikipedia...) Snarglefoop (talk) 15:19, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
    Indeed, I was mistaken that this article on anal stimulation with rodents was of the Wacky Religion genre, and Llwy is mistaken too, as it is "a poop joke" to begin with. But it is a very poor-quality ramble and I'm not flipping my vote. I'll reset the clock in case any other voters have second thoughts. Spıke Ѧ 15:34 8-Oct-14
    If saved, should be renamed to align with Wikipedia and have {{Wikipedia}} added for the reader's "benefit." Spıke Ѧ 15:35 8-Oct-14
  6. I honestly can't believe this article hasn't once mentioned that Lemmywinks episode of South Park (as long as what Snarglefoop says is true). ConCass2 (talk) 21:04, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 Pikey H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. This appears to be nothing more than a very long and rambling rant. If you didn't know what pikeys were before, most of what you learn about them from this article is that the authors think they are terrible and know a lot of ways in which they are terrible. I can see no redeeming value here, so I say redirect it to Pikeys - Our Friends. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:27 8 October 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Redirect. If I were not voting on huffing content but deciding whether to read on, the first sentence would veto it: Pikey literally translates to mean 'Filthy rude inbred shit',or "fat,tax averting, robbers who resort to violence and lack of personal hygiene as a way through life". The satisfaction of stating author's personal opinion in the first sentence ruins the article. (I did read on, and the rest of the article ruins itself just fine.) Replacement article uses irony expertly. Spıke Ѧ 00:36 8-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete.Oooo a minority group. Let's attack them; that'll be funny. Snarglefoop (talk) 02:08, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. and redirect to an existing feature. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 14:53, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 20:12, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Premarital wanking

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. As the author discloses on her user page, this article is intended to make a serious point about religion and sexuality. This is exactly what it does, at the expense of being funny. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:11 8 October 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Whatever -- weak delete The author's a preachy atheist, which is kind of a bad combination. (But then, so's a preachy Christian, and I suppose being a preachy Muslim would be kind of unfortunate too.) I dunno -- it's not quite as totally without redeeming social value as some of the other stuff she wrote but it probably deserves to be canned. Snarglefoop (talk) 16:23, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The only comedy theme I see is a caricature of Christians. For example, the copyright notice at the end, assigned to the Westboro Baptist Church, serves to say, "This is what would come out of their mouths, because they are so extreme." That's advocacy. Spıke Ѧ 16:35 8-Oct-14
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. As Llwy points out, the author's page says she is trying to make "serious points" in their article. And as Snarglefoop says, it was written by a preachy atheist, which makes it no better than an article written by a militant Christian. Uncyclopedia isn't the place for this kind of humour (I'm guessing it's some form of shock humour, but I'm not really sure), nor for informative wisecracks. ConCass2 (talk) 16:46, October 10, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Has potential but ends up sounding cliche. Plus, we already have a much more clever satire on almost the same topic at UnBooks:The Nearly-Chaste Mormon's Guide to Quitting Masturbation. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:45, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

Mark Rutte H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Spotted by Llwy-ar-lawr. Imported from the Dutch Uncyclopedia last year as the only contribution of Burgerhallojan, seemingly translated by machine, poorly; minimal attempt to clean up and tons of red-links. Notable enough to have a Wikipedia entry, but the reader will be straining too hard to read the "English" to laugh. Spıke Ѧ 00:38 29-Sep-14
  2. Yeah. That. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:44 29 September 2014
  3. Wut? --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:06, October 4, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Ugh my head --Moonhead 42 (talk) 11:33, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:51, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Actually, Spike did see it, and commented to its author about it, but, er... this sentence ought to have a sensible ending and I just can't think of one. Maybe this is a pointless comment and I should go back to sleep. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:44 29 September 2014

🔒 UnBooks:The sad fate of the banned users who escaped into a Sock puppet H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: -2 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg Navelism. Diary of an Uncyclopedian who got banned. Delete despite title that virtually assures that no one will call for it. Spıke Ѧ 23:59 7-Oct-14
  1. I don't feel up to rewriting it and I dislike the concept. Always have, always will. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:09 8 October 2014
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. poorly written, but funny enough idea. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 11:38, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I liked it and will work on its prose. Anton (talk) 12:19, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
    Oh, but Llwy has already worked on its prose! I like what is currently at User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Blargh, but if we are going to replace the current version with it, it would be good to do it without deleting the article (so that the history of the page is kept). Anton (talk) 12:23, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep/Replace. Am flipping because deletion loses this vote; I still dislike the concept and would vote to delete it in the future. Spıke Ѧ 12:30 11-Oct-14
Comments
  • In its current state, this article is definitely fuel for the fire. However, I've made some attempts at rewriting it (on the fork, not here, not yet, maybe in a little while I'll bring it over) and I'm not sure if it's worth giving up just yet. RAHB seemed to think it was worth fixing. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:03 8 October 2014
  • Also, something to keep in mind about these articles that no one will search for: many of them are linked from other articles and I'm sure people click on links. See here for how I stumbled on it in the first place. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:09 8 October 2014
    Only three of the callers are in mainspace. The fact that a personal rant was discussed on a lot of user pages doesn't justify a Keep in mainspace. Spıke Ѧ 00:19 8-Oct-14
  • I've dumped my somewhat rewritten version at User:Llwy-ar-lawr/Blargh; I invite you to read it and consider replacing the current article with it. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 15:53 8 October 2014
    Still navelism and still reads as autobiographical. Spıke Ѧ 23:28 8-Oct-14

LOLcat Translator Project H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. There is no original comedy, only the gimmick of parroting other webizens in order to ridicule them, at the risk of breaking the "encyclopedia" cover joke and producing a page that is painful to read; and no point of it, other than to induce you to go to several external websites. It is an advertisement. Spıke Ѧ 23:26 8-Oct-14
  2. Article delights in calling the subject retarded, with little in the way of real humour. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 01:39 9 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg AAAARGH AAAAARGH! Sorry, this huge wall of text scared me. By the way Spike, if it can be classed as an advertisement, wouldn't you be able to just delete it on those grounds without a long voting process? ConCass2 (talk) 16:49, October 10, 2014 (UTC)
    I could and do delete just-created articles that seem designed mainly to advertise something. Articles over a week old (and not tagged in their infancy) should come here; after all, the "advertisement" could have been added in mid-life by a vandal. Spıke Ѧ 16:54 10-Oct-14
  4. Nuclear Explosion Seal.PNG Obliterate. MY EYES!!!! --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 02:48, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Spike right, is full page ad. In any case, concept of LOLCat bible funny, actual instantiation just tedious, and also being sold for actual dollars on Amazon, so this page is an actual commercial ad, currently hosted for free by Uncyclopedia. Snarglefoop (talk) 14:51, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Here is the last version by the original author, which was written neither in LOLcat nor in all caps. Just putting that out there. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 01:34 9 October 2014
    Sorry, nominator was supposed to find better versions in the history. But the one you found is even more explicitly (because it's readable) an ad for the website. Spıke Ѧ 01:56 9-Oct-14
    I thought it was an advertisement against the website, since it repeatedly talks about how it's 'retarded' and whatnot, but in any case it's not good. Also, did you remove my other comment on purpose or...? It was a pretty inconsequential little comment, but I'd just like to know. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 03:48 9 October 2014
    Yes. This is a ballot, not a diary. Spıke Ѧ 10:16 9-Oct-14

Template:Fromwp H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Beginning an article with a fake note that it is "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" means you are pranking the reader, not writing a convincing satire of Wikipedia. We should not make it easier for authors to do this. Overt fraud invites our corporate webhost to slap a Content Warning back on top of our work. Spıke Ѧ 13:07 7-Oct-14
  2. Adds nothing to the relatively few articles it's on. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:42 7 October 2014
  3. Why does this exist? --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:09, October 7, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. i was gonna ask why this exists but someone else already has. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 11:34, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Per above. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:19, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • I always thought the potato made things fairly obvious. Re the content warning, I thought it was solely motivated by family-unfriendly content; am I wrong? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:42 7 October 2014
    The original rationale was the chance readers who thought the material here was factual and thus needed to pass through a clarifying message. It was a crusade that had a shifting rationale over time. Thanks for tagging this with {{VFD}}. Spıke Ѧ 18:09 7-Oct-14
    I don't know. It's funny when used at Vandalism, which nobody would mistake for an actual Wikipedia article. Anton (talk) 18:52, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
    But it seems you can only think of one example of an article on which it is useful; and so we should delete it because templates are intended to be for general use. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 02:31 11 October 2014
    I disagree with both ends of Anton199's assertion. The entire article talks in terms of Wikipedia pages, not Uncyclopedia pages. The knowledgeable reader wonder's what's going on: What are the assumptions of this play-act that he arrived late for? Its goal is to be mistaken for a Wikipedia article — which is prank, not comedy. Spıke Ѧ 02:41 11-Oct-14

🔒 Space Shuttle Challenger H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: -2 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The first line of this article is potential for a great article (paper burns quite well, NASA's lax safety measures etc.) but at the moment the article is memes + listcruft. I would really encourage someone to re-write the article based on the shuttle being a paper plane if they have the time. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:53, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I have both of Richard Feynman's autobiographies (he was the physicist who investigated the "cover-up" of the explosion, picked locks during the development of The Bomb, and has an unerring strategy for picking up Las Vegas waitresses) and will fix this article. Spıke Ѧ 11:26 11-Oct-14
    I'll change my vote when I've seen it. Good luck! Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 11:34, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
    Keepable now; a little more to come. Spıke Ѧ 15:31 11-Oct-14
  2. Looks good. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:40 11 October 2014
  3. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. It could be nastier and more acidic toward NASA but outside of that it's good....Even manages to be funny in spots, which is remarkable considering the subject matter. Snarglefoop (talk) 17:00, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

UnBlog H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Not good. Anton (talk) 13:21, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Navelism whose point is to display prowess in display tricks rather than to write humor. Spıke Ѧ 13:27 11-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:49, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg All I did was blankinate the Main Page. I'm offended. What gave you the idea you had to do something bad to get desysopped? Why settle for vandalism when you could become a martyr for your faith (or lack thereof) instead? Why be a martyr without a cause, when there are perfectly good causes to be fought for? Ah, but I digress. The main point is that this article is about nothing and is not interesting even to insiders. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:52 11 October 2014
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Meh. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:17, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 New Age H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. This begins with a random intro and goes on to present what looks like serious criticism, ending with a long chunk of text about pikeys that takes up the second half of the article. I have a replacement waiting on the sidelines. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:07 8 October 2014
    The proposed replacement has now been diverted elsewhere. The reason for this nomination is gone; I recommend it be closed as keep. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:53 12 October 2014
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I don't know what a pikey is, but I do know New Age music (which has little to do with New Age philosophy — or with music) and the segue is sort of funny. It is stilted and gassy — I've fixed it a little — but not huff-worthy. Spıke Ѧ 00:17 8-Oct-14
Comments
  • Maybe they're not pikeys... ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 02:14 8 October 2014
  • Symbol comment vote.svg Comment. As to when, it's supposed to be when the moon is in the seventh house, and Jupiter aligns with Mars, and I think it already happened back in the late 1900's and Love, which was supposed to take over the job of steersman for the stars, is running a bit behind schedule.
    FWIW I see no pikeys here at all; I see middle aged hippies climbing into antique VW microbuses painted with peace signs and long-forgotten slogans, trying to recapture the spirit of the Electric Cool-aid Acid Test. If they happen to be Irish or gypsies as well, that's just coincidence.
    Unfortunately I don't find it funny enough to warrant keeping, nor bad nor offensive enough to warrant deleting it, so I'm sitting on the fence. Snarglefoop (talk) 02:21, October 8, 2014 (UTC)

🔒 MediaWiki:Admin names in bold.css‎‎ H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 3 • voting closed
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. User-optional code to render the names of Admins in bold in reports and diff pages is tedious to keep current, and there is no evidence that anyone uses it. Spıke Ѧ 15:51 30-Sep-14
  2. Looks like we don't need this. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:14 30 September 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Don't know what this is, but I don't like it. ConCass2 (talk) 19:21, September 30, 2014 (UTC)
    See UN:HAX#Administrators listed in boldface in reports. Spıke Ѧ 13:10 7-Oct-14
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • The main reason for highlighting admins that I know of is to make it easier to flag down active ones--hence the original code that highlighted them only in recent changes, which both sites have now done away with. Highlighting them anywhere else is excessive and obnoxious, IMHO. Since we've taken the approach of making bold admins an optional CSS thing, it seems likely to me that anyone who is experienced enough to know how to use it is also experienced enough to know the active admins' names by heart, or at least where to go to get their attention. That certainly applies to me; I know who has what rights here and I've never had any use for calling them out beyond a desire to make things flashier. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:14 30 September 2014
    And besides, we already have a link to Uncyclopedia:Active Admins at the top of recent changes, in that grey box thingy, so even the original purpose of the bold names doesn't hold any water. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:33 30 September 2014
    One use for our code is that it highlights edits by Admins in a diff report or a page history, for the benefit of users who are hesitant to override Admins. Separately and again, what any other website does is not a factor here. Spıke Ѧ 16:43 30-Sep-14
  • Kept. Two weeks of apathy on this one included unanimous silence from all the other Admins. Spıke Ѧ 13:22 14-Oct-14

🔒 Greggs H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: -2 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Saying that a bakery provides "sh- to sc-" isn't funny. Well, that seems to be the only humour strategy of that article. As the page is no longer attracting the attention of the media, I presume it won't harm anyone to delete it, but it would still be great to have a better replacement article. Anton (talk) 13:20, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. With apologies, I'll vote to keep it this time, as we are not too far removed in time from getting a whole lot of media attention through the obscene logo we had on the site for a while. Improvements would be welcome, but I wouldn't confront readers with a red-link...yet. Spıke Ѧ 13:26 11-Oct-14
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Not too bad. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:47, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Though it was the original logo was replaced to mollify Greggs and Google, the article should stay for that reason only. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:47, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Going to sit on the fence. Anton is right that it's not funny, but Spike is right that we probably shouldn't have a redlink. Also, it at least has a concept; that's more than can be said for some of the stuff on here. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:49 11 October 2014
  • Kept and improved. The motto that bothered nominator, target company, and our webhost has been toned down in the name of alliteration, also avoiding lawsuits. Spıke Ѧ 14:36 15-Oct-14

HowTo:Skeet H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. This page is consecrated to a wasteful consumption of energies better devoted to the building of Communism. In Soviet Russia writing such stuff could get you three years in the cooler. Snarglefoop (talk) 18:04, October 10, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Seems to be nothing more than overt sexual references. I take it such material is considered funny by some, however. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 18:10 10 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The target reader hardly needs to read an article on the Facial, even if it broke any ground. Written not to amuse but to glorify. Spıke Ѧ 18:30 10-Oct-14
  4. Yuk.PNG Yummy! --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:15, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Are you sure you washed your hands after? --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:57, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 Thanksgiving (Nicole Westbrook song) H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: -1 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Indeed, starting an encyclopedia article with personal opinion (with mark-up in case anyone didn't get the point), then "attention whore...shitty," is the mark of a rant. In the quotecruft, the author shows that he gets irony, but he doesn't get the "satire encyclopedia" genre. Then a final section: Please! don't just provide a snide deconstruction of the video; write a clever, original story that tells how this song came to exist. Spıke Ѧ 11:14 12-Oct-14
  • I can see how the song might deserve to be parodied, but this seems to be mostly a rant. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 04:29 12 October 2014
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Rewritten (formerly nominator). ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 03:16 13 October 2014
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I got a laugh out the rewritten version. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:34, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • To add insult to cruft, author gives a drive-by slap to Americans for mostly celebrating holidays that are Christian and American. Unremarkable. Spıke Ѧ 11:28 12-Oct-14
  • Speaking of songs, could we spork Wikipedia's article on Black's Friday? It's really pretty funny IMHO... Snarglefoop (talk) 03:34, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
  • Save to Llwy. Spıke Ѧ 22:48 17-Oct-14

🔒 Ellen DeGeneres H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Not funny. It appears to be a rather dreary attack page, directed primarly against Ellen DeGeneres (eh? who?). Snarglefoop (talk) 02:36, October 8, 2014 (UTC)
  2. A bunch of ranty stuff about how her show sucks and lesbians are evil. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 02:42 8 October 2014
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. DeGeneres is famous in the US as a TV star and now a morning talk-show host who never lets the audience forget about her lesbianism. That is about all to say about her, but it is funny. This article had a lot of vandalism, including a long paragraph somehow involving Bush/Cheney and a copypasted Awards section, beat the lesbian theme into the reader's head, and attracted predictable anti-lesbian stock jokes, which Anon is no longer allowed to do. I've removed the worst of the cruft; huff it if you believe that leaves too little. Spıke Ѧ 07:57 8-Oct-14
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. very funny. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 04:07, October 16, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

🔒 Amanda Tapping H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 1 • voting closed
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. An old article, which has recently caught the attention of User:Beanna. Sorry to anyone who contributed to this, but I don't find any of the two version - Beanna's or the original one - good enough to stay here. Anton (talk) 18:46, October 9, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Maybe i just didn't get it, but didn't find it funny. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 23:20, October 16, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I would say it's much better after being reverted, but the bulk of it is "wacky religion", which I would've thought was exactly what Beanna would have added in. ConCass2 (talk) 21:40, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. It's ok I guess. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:06 9 October 2014
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. See comments. Spıke Ѧ 11:37 10-Oct-14
Comments
  • Beanna's tenure on Uncyclopedia has been singlemindedly devoted to converting this and related articles to a personal masturbatorium. He started back in when his second ban expired and I am hoping his third extends past the end of puberty. The article, after the revert, is nominally funny and well-produced. Spıke Ѧ 19:10 9-Oct-14
    Hmm...Masturbatorium, there's a red link begging for a story to fill it. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:54, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
    Is it kind of like a cafetorium? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:43 15 October 2014

🔒 UnBooks:So Your Parents Hate You: A Guide H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: -1 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Pedo Humor. UnBook written in the voice of Michael Jackson invites prospects to come to Neverland. Written to be creepy, not funny. Spıke Ѧ 21:16 18-Oct-14
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Set up alarms in the middle of the night to keep throwing your tantrum. I got a few laughs out of it--the concept is that reasonable things parents do are the ultimate signs of evil, and that's funny. I see nothing about paedophilia or Michael Jackson; if they're there anywhere, it's too subtle for me to pick up. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 21:28 18 October 2014
    Correction: I see that 'I' links to Michael Jackson in one or two places. Even so, however, I don't see the pedo stuff. Michael Jackson could easily be removed, leaving what appears to be an innocent article. I'll fix the grammar and punctuation. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 21:36 18 October 2014
    I've cleaned it up and given it a different ending. I encourage Spike to reconsider. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 22:06 18 October 2014
    Further correction: After doing some research, it turns out that Michael Jackson did apparently molest children, so you're not entirely off-base. In any case, that stuff is gone, so yeah. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 23:55 18 October 2014
    Impressive copy-editing, but then you tipped the Tipp-Ex onto the page, replacing the ending where creepy author exposes (!) himself as Jackson with an ending where author mumbles and wanders off. I won't reconsider (yet) but will lose the vote fair and square. Spıke Ѧ 01:27 19-Oct-14
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. The reworked version seems funny enough to me. (But perhaps my brain has melted from reading too many VFD'd articles...) Snarglefoop (talk) 00:28, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Vote closed (Kept) in view of the work done on it. Spıke Ѧ 21:35 20-Oct-14

🔒 Movie of Lady Whose Ankle Is Showing H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: -2 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Not that bad, but not good either. Anton (talk) 16:59, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (3)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Not that good, but not bad either. No, seriously, it has a good comedy theme — the very low threshold, a century ago, for the prudish to express horror; and develops it with refinement. Spıke Ѧ 17:11 19-Oct-14
  2. Wait, you mean over in America it is normal for women to show their ankles, and that this is just a pisstake? How modern. Before I go off-subject, Symbol keep vote.svg keep is my vote since this page made me chuckle. ConCass2 (talk) 20:31, October 19, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Per everyone else. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 18:40 20 October 2014
Comments

Third World War H Archive

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Nothing much in the article. No humour, no encyclopedic parody. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:47, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Concept is Wacky War plus history-of-the-future. Execution is stuck in lists, including the unfunny list of names of countries. Writing style is gibberish, starting with the first sentence — "...an armed conflict in The Third World, that took place during The Third World..." — not even a conundrum; ending with, "The outcome...is unclear." Spıke Ѧ 15:01 11-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg 123,456,789 (which is roughly over 9000). Little more than a few bad puns glued together with randomness and nonsense numbers. Includes a poke at Jews for good measure--of stupidity. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:14 11 October 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Boring. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:16, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

UnNews:NRA celebrates Colorado theatre shootings H Archive

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. First paragraph discloses to us that we are about to be treated to a more or less serious portrayal of the incident. The rest of the article tries and fails to remedy this shortcoming. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:14 12 October 2014 It seems more like criticism than satire, even though it is over-the-top. I'm waffling though. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 21:43 12 October 2014
    Errrmmmm ... Did you per chance read the linked article on Yahoo about the actual incident? More or less serious indeed.... Snarglefoop (talk) 20:56, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
    Original rationale rescinded because it was stupid. Separately, the fact that it was written by Aimsplode is certainly not a factor (though having little souvenirs of him around is not particularly pleasant). ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 21:43 12 October 2014
    Indeed. (I moved part of Llwy's post, above, to avoid an empty nomination.) In my opinion, you could vote Symbol delete vote.svg Delete from sheer advocacy or from unfunniness but Snarglefoop should resist the temptation to vote according to whether he agrees with its apparent thesis. Spıke Ѧ 22:52 12-Oct-14
    Heaven forbid! Humor sit omne hominis! Snarglefoop (talk) 23:26, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The author is trying to write a satire, but has very little to satirise, and fails miserably. ConCass2 (talk) 20:57, October 18, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. I had hoped that opponents of the NRA/Christians would admit that this is blunt and unclever advocacy. They are silent, so I'll say it. Spıke Ѧ 13:18 21-Oct-14
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Weird but not funny. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:23, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Nomination suggested that the UnNews was a "serious portrayal" of a massacre; it is not. I don't agree with, nor like, its thesis, that gun crimes are evidence that the NRA (also, incidentally, Christians) are laughably wrong. The Source, a Yahoo blog about a gloating tweet "associated" with the NRA, is misleading, as the NRA never endorses crimes using guns; I think the tweet was more likely planted. But I'm not sure that any of this, or the fact that it was written by a permabanned user, justify deleting it. Spıke Ѧ 21:28 12-Oct-14
  • Dunno. You have to hate the NRA pretty severely to find this funny, I think, 'cuz it's so totally contrary to reality. To be funny, I think stuff generally has to fall into the "uncanny valley" where it's almost believable, but not quite, and this is totally off the mark. To find it "almost believable" to you'd need to seriously believe the NRA was a bunch of raving lunatics.
    And as to the post reported by Yahoo -- even if it was really from the NRA it was just a case of bad timing (and it was probably either auto-generated after being scheduled days before, or it was sent by someone who hadn't heard the news); it appeared to me to be entirely unrelated to the shooting incident. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:22, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
    Again, less likely to be the NRA celebrating the massacre than anti-NRA forces (I include Yahoo) trying to make hay over it. In any case, though, if the author is not already anti-NRA, he will not be laughing but will be trying to gauge what this article is advocating. Goes against my advice to authors on writing about extremists (not that that means automatic deletion). Spıke Ѧ 14:32 13-Oct-14

HP Costa Rica Today H Archive

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. 2007 Uncyclopedian Hpsucks believes this offshore affiliate of Hewlett-Packard is gay. Spıke Ѧ 20:17 15-Oct-14
  2. Boring. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:41 15 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete.Even the article's title is a turn off. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:02, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:26, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

🔒 Tails the Straight H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 0 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. This isn't horrible, but it's also not funny, IMHO. The humor is too strained. It's a sort of parody of a parody of a minor character in the Sonic the Hedgehog cartoons, and from me, at least, it gets a great big "Eh what??", and the question, "Why does the world need this article?" leaps unbidden to one's mind. Snarglefoop (talk) 20:23, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Like last time. Spıke Ѧ 20:29 15-Oct-14
Comments

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly H Archive

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Spotted by an IP who pointed it out on the talk page, and unfortunately now has the idea that it reflects the quality of the entire website. In fact, it does not: it is a long string of explicit gay sex 'jokes', ending in a pointless list full of nonsense numbers. There are no better versions in the history. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:28 15 October 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Indeed there are not; the nonsense list, the dodgy humor, and even the dangling final sentence in the Intro about the theater waist-deep in cum, are from original author Strook in 2009. Spıke Ѧ 20:32 15-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete.. Checked the article's history. The author put this up for Pee Review! What was said there still stands. What a pile of puke!--Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:05, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Anton (talk) 16:24, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • IP sez, "Now I hate this website and it's your fault"? Not a consideration. Spıke Ѧ 20:34 15-Oct-14

Lake Zurich, Illinois

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Imagine, a small Midwestern town that has two kinds of assholes, megalomaniacs, and Mexicans! Anon was just in to correct the list of elementary schools. Either that, or cyber-bully. Who knows? Who cares? Spıke Ѧ 14:13 10-Oct-14
  2. What do Lake Zurich and this article have in common? They're both boring. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:22 10 October 2014
  3. Lake what? Where?? --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:55, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:45, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Symbol neutral vote.svg Abstain. Nobody's ever going to look this up but maybe for the one or two people from Lake Zurich that do, they'll find it funny. --Talk to me! Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 17:12, October 11, 2014 (UTC)

Devon H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Yet another article about some small area in England which is said to be inhabited by some sort of subhuman creatures that don't really speak English. Snarglefoop (talk) 02:09, October 12, 2014 (UTC)
    Small area of England! It's one of the most famous counties. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:14, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
    To some of us, England itself is a "small area." Spıke Ѧ 11:29 22-Oct-14
    Aye, to those of you with a small history, yes. ;) Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:59, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg the disease known as ‘chav’. Long string of attacks on Devon, with no humour and less concept. I believe there was a campaign to clear out such towncruft earlier in the century, but I wasn't there at the time; I was busy huffing imaginary rainbows. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 02:13 12 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Whatever ScottPat devises as a replacement will be better. Spıke Ѧ 11:29 22-Oct-14
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Don't know how soon I'll finish the re-write so might as well delete this now. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:57, October 23, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. and Replace b.svg Replace. with Scott's article, when it's ready. Anton (talk) 10:34, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Here is the last version by the first author; it's nothing spectacular and it's very short, but it's better than what's there now. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 02:20 12 October 2014
    Not much in the original version worth keeping, nor even worth the time to give it mark-up. I've deleted a lot of cruft from the current version; there is material inside that one could make an article out of. The content-free Intro prepares the reviewer for the worst. Unfortunately, the new author of Dudley, Mjr74 lives far away from Devon, if I read my maps aright, so we can't saddle him with this. Spıke Ѧ 11:25 12-Oct-14
    I notified Mjr74 anyway; he says he has visited Devon and has stuff he could add. Spıke Ѧ 01:56 14-Oct-14
  • I've gone for a re-write. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:14, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
    Hooray! Spıke Ѧ 11:29 22-Oct-14

🔒 Indiana Jones H D Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: -1 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. The introduction is the most random one I've ever read. After that, the article doesn't improve. Anton (talk) 17:03, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I spruced the intro up a bit to cut out some of the randomness and cut out a chunk of the article and replaced it with something new, entitled "Indiana Jones and the Adventure that May be at Variance to this Article." I think it just needs to be edited/ spruced up, that's all. IndianaJones104 (talk) 22:31, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. The article has a theme: the absurd lengths of movie titles of the form, "Indiana Jones and the...."; also pearls of good Choice of Words. The final three sections (ineptly typed following the {{Reflist}}, which had nothing in it anyway), were short sections that did nothing but tell the same joke again; and IndianaJones104's edits of today merely added red-links, memes, and a Section 2 at odds with the rest of the article. Spıke Ѧ 22:44 21-Oct-14
Comments
  1. I don't get it. I made the first sentence less random, but I still don't see any good humour. "His brother, Han Solo", "a sickly young man, who contracted the terminal disease, bad-ass", "closet-gay extraordinare Benjamin Franklin"... I can explain several jokes but they still aren't funny. And about the absurdly long movie titles: I don't find "Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom" or "...the Raiders of the Lost Ark" very long, so there seems to be no basis for that comedy theme in this article. It might not have to be deleted, but most of its parts should be rewritten. Anton (talk) 18:30, October 22, 2014 (UTC)
    I stand corrected: The titles of the actual movies aren't absurdly long. But they are long, and inventing some that are absurdly long is humor by exaggeration. The article can absolutely benefit from further editing. Spıke Ѧ 18:38 22-Oct-14
  • Should IndianaJones105's section be reverted? I'm not sure I care for either version of the section, but just putting it out there. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 02:15 24 October 2014

Threesome H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (6)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Article, ostensibly about group sex, makes the point that Catholics whip sinners, and keeps making it and making it until it becomes totally non-encyclopedic and the goal is to see how far into the reader's head it can be driven, not to be funny. Spıke Ѧ 12:11 13-Oct-14
  2. It's like the article is whipping the reader's brain for committing the sin of trying to read it. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:05 13 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Ho hum Whatever it is it doesn't seem to be funny. Snarglefoop (talk) 03:45, October 14, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Agreed. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 01:12, October 15, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. It has a joke: the narrator whips himself after each erotic moment, in order not to succumb to the sin, and his interlocutor finds it arousing, but it's the only one and I don't think it's worth it. Anton (talk) 10:31, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
  6. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. ConCass2 (talk) 21:28, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. It's a bit silly but I don't see why it should head for the shredder. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:01, October 17, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

Turkish-Greek conflict H Archive

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Citizens of "two idiot countries" battle in our encyclopedia with all available weapons except good English. Fire all nonsense numbers! Spıke Ѧ 11:52 22-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ScottPat (talk • contribs) 14:12, 2014 October 22 (UTC)
  3. A bunch of shavings from the logs of randomness trees, glued together with English that was after its running through a food processor. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 02:37 24 October 2014
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Anton (talk) 16:59, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Kebab it!--Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 10:02, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

UnPoetia:Bluebeard H Archive

Score: 2 • voting closed
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. This is a straight copypasta of an existing article. Appears to be exactly the same as the original. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:45, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
    Which one, please? This one has a history dating back to 2005, so perhaps it is the other way around. If what you say is true, delete "administratively"; VFD exists only to protect unique content, not copies. Spıke Ѧ 12:02 26-Oct-14
  2. Yes, it's a copypasta, but not of anything of ours. It's ripped from here. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 13:57 26 October 2014
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • Deleted. Flagrantly unoriginal to Uncyclopedia; no improvement since Spintherism contributed it in 2005 except mark-up. Spıke Ѧ 14:16 26-Oct-14

Uterus or GTFO! H Archive

Score: 4 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Per Spike on my talk page, this article documents a meme without making it funny. It seems to exist mainly to advertise pictures of pregnant women. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 00:38 13 October 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Per me on her talk page: "A flagrant example of (1) basing an Uncyclopedia article on a meme (viz, "Tits or GTFO," that is: post pornography or I will assume it never happened) from another website and (2) extrapolating so far that the reader has to "guess the punch line to read the joke." I stated no opinion on his goals, as I would grant Mnbvcxz his little affectation if he would just quit changing diapers and return. Spıke Ѧ 00:49 13-Oct-14
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Anton (talk) 18:17, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. It's pretty bad in an unfunny way. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:15, October 27, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments

If anything brings back Preggo man, it will be deleting this article. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:05, October 16, 2014 (UTC)

🔒 Miranda Cosgrove's Uterus H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 2 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Yuk.PNG Delete I confess I only read the first paragraph. (If anyone wants to tell me I'm an irresponsible jerk for nomming it without first reading the whole thing, go right ahead ... but please read the whole thing yourself before you do that.) Snarglefoop (talk) 13:15, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
    Yeah, I'll step up to that task; the reason VFD is here is to ensure authors that their stuff won't be deleted without discussion, vote, and 24-hour notice; and authors should get the additional safeguard of knowing that any nominator will evaluate the whole thing. (Even the history, as the rules require, and perhaps the talk page.) If all you know is that it has a crappy Intro, repair might not require deleting the entire page. If you had gotten to the end, you would have seen a hint that this is one of the articles fleshing out Mnbvcxz's pregnancy infatuation. Some voters may view this as an inherent part of the history of Uncyclopedia. On the nomination itself, I'm abstaining. Cosgrove is a celebrity but there is no real comedy point to us speculating about her innards. We have deleted knock-offs of this meme. Spıke Ѧ 14:23 13-Oct-14
    Wait ... did you say this is a meme? Like, claiming weird stuff about Miranda Cosgrove's organs is a standing joke on the Internet? I don't understand the world. That is clear. Snarglefoop (talk) 14:55, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
    I meant only an Uncyclopedia meme or in-joke, though this is not in any official list; not that it goes wider than Uncyclopedia. Spıke Ѧ 15:03 13-Oct-14
  2. I, on the other hand, did read the whole thing, and I came to the same conclusion. Indeed, uterine newts (and sometimes eels) and Miranda Cosgrove (who played Carly Shay in iCarly, which may have originated the newt-pregnancy meme) are injokes here, perpetuated by Mnbvcxz--and I don't find the newt pregnancy stuff to be funny, which is to be expected from something that is merely an expression of someone's fetish. On this tine of the fork, arousal does not equal amusement. I will also echo the importance of reading the whole article, as Chess, which has a sucky intro but a perfectly good middle, was deleted on the fork in Forest Fire Week, IIRC after being tagged by someone who often does not read past the intro and has thus destroyed several perfectly good articles. This anecdote is here not to shoehorn in goings-on at another random website for no reason, but to provide an example of what we shouldn't do here. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 15:48 13 October 2014
    This is still a ballot, not a diary. Citing other websites and specific personalities at other websites is not a valid argument, in my opinion — either as examples or counterexamples. Spıke Ѧ 16:09 13-Oct-14
    Well, you see, I think of it as citing Uncyclopedia to prove a point about Uncyclopedia. Clearly you don't see it that way, and your opinion is no less valid than mine so I suppose I'll just keep my mouth shut. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:26 13 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Straight to userspace. Unless I get to write an article about my disgusting fetishes. 19 year old Colombian boys and girls covered in honey and tied up lightly coming to the main page soon. --Nikau (talk) 17:50, October 13, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Pointless article, most likely something not many people will look for. ConCass2 (talk) 20:35, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
    No--but they may well look for Miranda Cosgrove and instead find themselves directed to the article on her uterus. Is this a good or bad thing? What was I trying to say? ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 23:42 20 October 2014
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg "Her doctor...pronounced her Fallopian tubes "Thin as Paper" at a Veterinarian's office in L.A. called Healthy Hounds." I too have now given it a complete read — for the first time, in fact — and I enjoyed the ride. Spıke Ѧ 16:24 13-Oct-14
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I wanted to vote delete, but laughed several times while reading the page. Anton (talk) 18:37, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Yuk.PNG Yuk. So after being double-barked at over wimping out after the first paragraph, I went back and read the whole thing. It is a fantasy piece of the sort dreamed up by 12 year old boys, which gave the author the chance to write "uterus" many times and even use such exciting terms as "cervix" and "reproductive system" in a few places. Unfortunately most of it is too far away from reality to be taken as anything except nonsense, and none of it is funny. Furthermore, down at the end, it mutates briefly into a Wacky War article, which doesn't really improve things.
    On the plus side, the grammar and spelling are both very clean. And that'll get you a free ride on the MBTA (at least, it will if you've also got two dollars along, to put in the little 'contributions' box at the front of the bus). Snarglefoop (talk) 16:12, October 13, 2014 (UTC)

🔒 Doom .0068 H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: -1 • voting closed
Delete (1)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Blasphemy! The best game ever has been transformed into... I'm not quite sure what this is. It's some kind of anti-creationist rant that was created in time for the game's 15th year, which I'll assume means the article was created simply to draw attention when it would've been topical. ConCass2 (talk) 21:10, October 26, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (2)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep/rewrite This article parodies the religious opposition that came out to the game when it was originally released. (Creatures from hell? Upside down goats-head pentagrams? Zombie soldiers that still look like people? Save our children!) The anti-Darwinism has nothing to do with the game and should be written out of the article though, in favor of making fun of overprotective parents. Perhaps it should be written from a gun control perspective instead, but it definitely has redeeming elements to it, like the monsters being cardboard and throwing rocks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Simsilikesims (talk • contribs)
  2. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. thought was good. --Moonhead 42 (talk) 22:50, October 28, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • {{VFD}} added and clock reset. Spıke Ѧ 21:35 26-Oct-14
  • "Since the church is primarily full of people with no capacity for intelligent thoughts...." From the entire Intro to this quote toward the end, opposition to Catholicism shouts out as the article's theme rather than humor. I defer until gamers confirm my impression that the many other items in the article have little to do either with Doom or with the church. 21:35 26-Oct-14 Simsie disputes my impression, and did a little clean-up. Spıke Ѧ 10:24 29-Oct-14

🔒 The Last World War H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 2 • voting closed
Delete (3)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. In depth analysis, stage-by-stage using maps, of a made-up conflict that only the author cares about. Complete with made-up statistics like "123,456" as well. Sir ScottPat (converse) White Ensign.gif Scotland Flag 1.png Compassrose.gif VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:49, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg It is occasionally criticized for being slightly destructive. The intro--from which that sentence is taken--looked promising, but the descriptions of the conflict didn't do anything for me. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:27 11 October 2014
  3. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. This article about nothing keeps begging for editors' time to fix it up, while never inducing anyone to take control and make it funny. See also Comments. Spıke Ѧ 12:05 13-Oct-14
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Sorry, but I found it funny, especially the maps. Anton (talk) 12:27, October 11, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • I voted Symbol keep vote.svg Keep last time based on Aleister doing work, a commitment that he says in the ballot he never made. I had been moved at the concept of the unknowability of a Last War; now I find the concept undeveloped and I think the bit about humanity going extinct and the author being a panda is dumb. Llwy is working on it, but the maps Anton199 likes suggest to me comic book, not encyclopedia; and the problem is the text, which needs a better comedy theme than "War so nutty!" Spıke Ѧ 16:48 11-Oct-14
    All I did was fix some spelling and formatting, and I don't see myself doing any more; I wouldn't overestimate me. It's more readable now, but no funnier. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 16:56 11 October 2014

Igpay Atinlay H T D Survivor Tag article

Score: 3 • voting closed
Delete (4)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Replace. 1 gimmick, 0 jokes (may be more than 0 but it's too tedious to scan the article to see if there are jokes). Page title with gimmick applied to it ensures no one will search for it, or they will get exactly what they expected and will not laugh. Spıke Ѧ 10:38 19-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. How the Hell did it not cross the author's mind that nobody can read this page? (Unless this is a prime example of the author trying to amuse himself out of confusing the readers) ConCass2 (talk) 20:32, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
  3. Replace with non-Pig Latin version, and probably move to Pig Latin (unless there's something there, in which case I'm not sure what we do). I am no scholar of Pig Latin and I find it about as bothersome to read as do Spike and ConCass, but I found the actual content somewhat amusing. I strongly encourage anyone whose main or sole criterion for voting delete was its unreadability to read the English version and reconsider. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 22:53 20 October 2014
    Changing above vote to Replace. That was a fun read. How can anyone on a humor wiki prefer a page that is merely a perfect encoding? Spıke Ѧ 22:55 20-Oct-14
  4. Replace b.svg Replace. or something. The actual content is pretty good and the main problem seems that the article is hard to read. It would be good if it was replaced by Llwy's "translated" version, but the original should probably be kept as a subpage and linked to in the See also section, because there are people who will actually find reading the page in Pig Latin more amusing than reading it in English. Also, the page doesn't have to be deleted at all: the original one could be kept where it is now, and Llwy's version can be pasted at Pig Latin... Anton (talk) 16:19, October 21, 2014 (UTC)
    And you don't need a vote of VFD to replace a redirect that doesn't delete an Uncyclopedian's substantive work. But I won't flip my vote anyway; I don't want the gimmicky version to exist, because editors spend time polishing the codification that they could spend writing funny stuff. I recently tweaked HTBFANJS#Pages that look like the things they're about to be a little more disapproving; for instance, to cite only articles that have more than a gimmick, versus articles that pursue a gimmick unusually well. Spıke Ѧ 16:31 21-Oct-14
    Have moved the plaintext article to Pig Latin, replacing the redirect. Spıke Ѧ 23:49 23-Oct-14
    We could also have the Pig Latin and English versions side by side in the same article, with a table or something. That seems like enough of a compromise to satisfy everyone to some extent. In any case, I hope we preserve the history instead of just deleting the thing and moving 'mine' on top, because the real authors should be given credit. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 22:47 21 October 2014
    No, please! We ought not put fairness to previous authors on a par with having an article hang together and look good. A link is OK, for readers who really want Pig Latin in Pig Latin; but presenting him with multiple versions at once distracts him for the sake of someone's vanity. Spıke Ѧ 13:55 23-Oct-14
Keep (1)
  1. Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. I think it's kind of cute. I got a laugh out of it. Granted, it's a little hard to read, but I think it should stay in Pig Latin -- it just seems totally appropriate. Snarglefoop (talk) 22:43, October 20, 2014 (UTC)
Comments

🔒 Igpay Atinlay H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage bis

Score: 1 • voting closed
Delete (2)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. Having moved the plaintext version to Pig Latin, replacing the redirect to Igpay Atinlay, do voters still want the article about Pig Latin in Pig Latin to go away? I do. Spıke Ѧ 23:49 23-Oct-14
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. If we have the article in English, having a duplicate in unreadable Pig Latin is stupid and unnecessary. ConCass2 (talk) 12:58, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
    As I said above, I think we should have one. I found reading the page on Pig Latin in Pig Latin quite amusing and very Uncyclopedia-like past-time. I know many people who will actually laugh when they see it. Anton (talk) 13:09, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
    Does it imply that no future Uncyclopedian should edit Pig Latin without (groan!) keeping Igpay Atinlay in synch? Spıke Ѧ 13:15 25-Oct-14
    I think that's going to be up to the editor who will want to make any changes to Pig Latin. Anton (talk) 13:30, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (1)
  1. OK, Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Anton (talk) 12:14, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
Comments
  • Could it be a subpage maybe? (I have no opinion.) ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 02:13 24 October 2014
    In fact, it could stay right where it is, though I'd rather it not. Spıke Ѧ 10:18 25-Oct-14
  • As per what I said in the first nomination, I think we should keep it somewhere. If it stays right where it is, it should have a link to the plain English version right at the beginning, however. Anton (talk) 10:25, October 25, 2014 (UTC)
    That would be a Symbol keep vote.svg Keep. Spıke Ѧ 10:40 25-Oct-14

🔒 Jizzlam H T D Survivor Add {{Oldvfd}} to talkpage

Score: 5 • voting closed
Delete (5)
  1. Symbol delete vote.svg Did I already say masturbate? Indeed, this article consists almost entirely of masturbation, with a few references to religion around the edges that aren't clever enough to make it funny. User:Nikau/Jizzlam does it much better. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:32 29 October 2014
  2. Symbol delete vote.svg Replace. Nikau's version is far better; see its nomination at VFH for further discussion. Spıke Ѧ 20:36 29-Oct-14
  3. Replace b.svg Replace. Anton (talk) 10:24, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  4. Symbol delete vote.svg Delete. An attack page that targets Christianity more than it does Islam. I could be wrong as far as "more than" is concerned, but the article is waaay too tedious to read through and judge entirely (which makes me doubt the VFH template at the top is genuine). ConCass2 (talk) 15:18, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
  5. Replace b.svg Replace. --Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:06, October 30, 2014 (UTC)
Keep (0)

No keep votes.

Comments
  • This is probably the wrong place to say this, but Talk:Flying toasters isn't much better: The images on {{delete}} and {{VFDn}} are shot. The latter one especially bothers me because they have a practical use--as links for doing various things to the article. Since they're just letters, perhaps they should be replaced with regular links to avoid not only inconveniences like this one but potentially overzealous ad blockers. ❦ Llwy-ar-lawr • talk • contribs • 20:36 29 October 2014
  • Deleted and replaced. Spıke Ѧ 22:14 30-Oct-14
Retrieved from "https://uncyclopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:Votes_for_deletion/Archive-2014-10&oldid=6185053"