From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 12
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (12) |
- Uh -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 23:53, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- "The first fly was also a retard." So is this page. Spıke Ѧ 00:21 27-Apr-11
- Sorry Lollipop It's really bad. -- 00:24, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 00:52, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 01:00, 27 April 2011
- Random, not funny, etc, etc etc.
1234 ~ 01:31, 27 April 2011
- FFEFRYTRYGRTG!!!!!!DESTROY! The vileness of this makes me shit brickz!--Fcukman 03:52, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
- De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 04:07 Apr 27 2011
- Delete. Failing article from the last Happy Monkey competition. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:48, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry. Very sorry. Nothing personal, but... Sorry. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 15:19, 27 April, 2011 (UTC)
- I was walking down the street and people were pointing at me laughing. "He's the one who hasn't voted delete on 'Fly (insect)'" I heard one of them whisper. So here I am.[1] mAttlobster. (hello) 15:47, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Shake well and spray. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:44, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Same here. Even the flies were pointing at me... *snif*[1] Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 15:54, 27 April, 2011 (UTC)
- --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 16:48, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Before I begin my eight months of hibernation, I just need to nominate this. EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:19, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Opportunities to improve the wording--or just correct it--occurred as I read this article, but its only point is to document the lion's coming-out as a gay cartoon character: Trite. If anyone is thinking about saving this, first kill the list of "people he's slept with." Spıke Ѧ 17:31 26-Apr-11
- Burninate! I had a cat once who was nicknamed "Snagglepuss." When I got him, they said he was a girl. It was a few months before the vet alerted me that he was actually a male. He acted so much like a girl though, I always thought of him as the world's first transgendered cat. Sadly, he passed away this year, and this article dishonors his memory. Also, it's dumb; I've wanted to VFD this for a long time. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 19:50, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- That's just ugly. And bad. And badly written. And stuff. But more importantly, it's ugly.
1234 ~ 01:34, 27 April 2011
- Delete. Clark Gable and Snagglepuss. Yes..I saw no connection whatsoever. Crap random article of the month (so far). --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:47, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Obliterate. It's a made up place, based on a non-notable place and Bondo'd together with blatant nonsense filler. I dredged through the entire article (as well as its history) and found no evidence of funny. Looks like someone's got a vendetta against the actual place. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 01:47, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It starts off OK but it has nowhere to go. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:12, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Dittoes to TheSlyFox, except "the actual place" is not the actual place. The suburban social-work building five miles south of the Michigan capital is not a police department. But it seems that people are working out their animus against their department by documenting it in a fictional encyclopedia about a fictional PD. Spıke Ѧ 02:28 26-Apr-11
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 21:22, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Tedious... or so it strikes me.
1234 ~ 01:39, 27 April 2011
- Delete. It's as if it's trying to get something off of its chest, but it's not quite succeeding. Maybe if it's put out of its misery, it can reflect on itself.--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:59, April 27, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Aaaand you forgot the {{VFD}} tag, and nobody else noticed... whooohoo! Go us! Someone should, like, renominate it and do it right this time.
1234 ~ 05:48, 27 April 2011
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (5) |
- Merge I get it, reversal humor is a classic style, dating at least back to 1968. But I say tack it onto the London Underground, or maybe Streetcar or something. I think its a cute idea. But what the heck is TFL? --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 19:36, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Needs a tidy up but should be kept. TFL=Transport for London. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 20:08, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I think it's sorta funny. I agree, needs work. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 20:25, 25 April 2011
- Keep, not a bad little page as some sign says. And I know for two facts that SPIKE is a U.S.A.'er, and thus is biased against the Overground. Yankee clipper! Aleister 22:40 25-4-'11
- Keep mAttlobster. (hello) 23:14, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. I just don't think this deserves to live. You?--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 14:32, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. We have an adequate London Underground. What does this article do, except appeal to people who want page names to cater to a sort of Russian Reversal? What is TFL? What is the point, except that government construction projects are useless and finish late, which needs actual cleverness to not be trite? Spıke Ѧ 17:28 25-Apr-11
|
Comments |
- Comment. Added a couple of images. Not brilliant but I think it can be kept out of the furnace. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:39, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. It is grimy and unkempt, but on-target. So is the article. Spıke Ѧ 01:41 25-Apr-11
- Ugly. but keepable. (talk) 02:16, 25 April 2011
- Keep. If we nuke jersey, someone may need a place to crash for a while. Your couch available? --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 19:44, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Whee! Eh?--Respond 20:40, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Although it needs more Bergerac. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:15, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Obliterate. Unfunny. Might as well suck Ass. -- Herp. Derp. Imandreas did this. 01:30, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Ugly and unfunny. --~ 14:18, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (6) |
- Keep. - Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 05:13, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Stub. I actually kind of like this one. Admittedly, everything beyond the opening section is sheer rubbish; I would just trim it down to a stub, leaving only the quotes and opening photo intact. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 09:23, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. It is fucking awsome. -- Herp. Derp. Imandreas did this. 01:00, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
- NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 04:50, 26 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:33, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep.--Respond 17:28, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Sucks – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 05:11 Apr 24, 2011 05:11, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The article's entertaining digression into Nuclear subs and Nuclear family is not done with skill--indeed, nothing is done with skill--but is a symptom of trying to throw the kitchen sink at this article, including quotes, templates, a section after the end, and an audio I'm not going to listen to to see if it's relevant. Should have stuck with its original theme: A revolutionary new cleaner that can eradicate any stains (by obliterating the thing they are on). If you want to save this, it won't suffice to just prune it. Spıke Ѧ 13:10 24-Apr-11
- There's just something I like about those quotes. At the very least, they will be going to my
userspace junkyard. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 00:45, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Black Flamingo 20:25, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- I had to see what it would look like when it was cleaned up a little. It still sucks massive balls. (talk) 02:29, 25 April 2011
- See comment below -DeathBySnowman (talk) 20:18, 25 April 2011
- Delete Painful. Just a mess that adds up to nothing. mAttlobster. (hello) 20:40, April 26, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
I think the few good parts including the picture should be merged into other related articles such as possibly nuclear power, nuclear power plant, or maybe even nuclear holocaust. I was going to add nuclear fission to the list, but after skimming realized that is a pretty weak article in itself. -DeathBySnowman (talk)
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Despite using staples of triteness such as nonsense numbers, red-links, and bird poo, this is a real article about a real singer, and much of the humor is based on real ridiculousness, such as Welsh-ness. Do kill the Discography. Spıke Ѧ 02:51 23-Apr-11
- Weak keep - Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 04:58, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Aw shucks - Despite going overboard on the multiple key repeats. Obviously a lot of work went into creating this wacky world of Duffy. I think with a little TLC to make it a bit more of the accepted style to which it aspires and we could have some first rate topics for slash fiction. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:58, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Thick with nonsense and musiciancruft but with very little actual humor. It feels like a drag to read, not a joy. --Count of Monkey Crisco 02:01, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Weak Delete. Crufty, redlinky, too many nonsensical numbers and memes... This will probably end up staying, but it needs a lot of work. I'm probably unqualified for the job--I'm too old school when it comes to music. "Today's music ain't got the same soul!" -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 06:31, April 25, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. – (ooh!) (aah!) ...·º•ø®@» LEG CUN GUN DUN 17:27, 23 April 2011
- Delete. Apart from greeting the reader with Russian Reversal and a blurry photo of two women wrassling on the lawn, the half-true bio must have been written with someone specific in mind. Apart from such cyber-bullying, it has no point. Spıke Ѧ 17:41 23-Apr-11
- Right... this is... uh, lovely.
1234 ~ 17:49, 23 April 2011
- Oh, the humanity... EpicAwesomeness (talk) 18:41, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- EXTERMINATE! quickly before the subject of this article reads it and comes after us for not doing it quickly enough! --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:46, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- BURN IT! - Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 01:55, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate indeed. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 05:33, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. I don't think anything needs to be said. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:05, 23 April 2011
"he has high qualms for attempting to replace family members if they are raped with the person who raped them" Stub should have been QVFD'd. Spıke Ѧ 17:42 23-Apr-11
|
Comments |
- Too new... Do you not see the ICU on it? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 06:03, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, I do see it now--and I don't see a VFD. Invalid nom; but Frosty was too charitable in tagging (and protecting) a single paragraph typed by an Anon who has done nothing else here. Should have been taken straight to QVFD. Spıke Ѧ 13:04 24-Apr-11
- Too new.
1234 ~ 17:00, 24 April 2011
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Sub page to JNNN TV Anda, which was deleted in October because it was borderline vanity. This is the sdame, but uglier.--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:17, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Template: "This page was designed to offend." Worked! but I prefer pages that are designed to amuse. Spıke Ѧ 01:31 23-Apr-11
- Yes. Although I was under the impression subpages of deleted pages were usually deleted outright upon being found, regardless of prior nominations... anyhow, what's this one doing on that template?
1234 ~ 01:41, 23 April 2011
- EXTERMINATE! I read JNNN TV Anda/Homepage, and all I got was this lousy seizure. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:53, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- DESTRUCT!!!! personal attack DETECTED!!!!. --Fcukman 14:39, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. What? -DeathBySnowman (talk) 16:58, 23 April 2011
|
Comments |
Comment. I'm gonna archive it in userspace. Ok?? - LOL vandalz 10:07, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Simply out of jest. It's going anyway, eh?--Respond 01:59, April 24, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (8) |
- Delete. Pointless and unfunny. The name sounds good, but the actual article leaves one, er... unsatisfied. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 00:27, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I am tired of LOL as I am sure that no one is actually Laughing Out Loud or least of all Rolling On The Floor but is using these acronyms because she should be, she wants me to think she is, etc. So an article trying to develop an LOL culture is trite before it begins, even if it weren't preachy and didn't use Section 4 to pat itself on the back for being good enough to induce a "Lolgasm." Did I mention nonsense year number and psuedo-science? Spıke Ѧ 00:34 23-Apr-11
- It's bad.
1234 ~ 00:58, 23 April 2011
- Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:21, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. - Its like I know it wants to be funny, but misses that glistening drop of something. It pains me, but all in all, to me a gasm suggests something a bit more. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 05:50, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Contains no animated pictures of women squirting after profuse amounts of laughter. A waste of time. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:52, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- NOT GOOD ENOUGH! *cracks whip* --Scofield 16:04, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Agree with kevillips. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 17:01, 23 April 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: 8
|
Keep (0) |
Weak keep Either move to UnScripts or to Userspace. I did this when I was a n00b. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 04:32, 22 April 2011
|
Delete (8) |
- Not even really an article, no concept and confusing to boot. (talk) 04:31, 22 April 2011
- Sorry man, but there really isn't any body of text here to establish concept, let alone humour. It's just just some rather unfunny and nonsensical dialogue.
1234 ~ 05:39, 22 April 2011
- Delete. Never mind, it isn't funny. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 05:53, 22 April 2011
- I agree with the person who wrote this article that Sid the Kid is a wimp, BUT this article (not even really an article) is not funny and doesn't even really make sense. -DeathBySnowman (talk)18:21, 22 April 2011
- I like the title... but that's it. --Black Flamingo 22:59, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Per all the above. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 00:30, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Ice hockey is like European football not just in whining and crying but in performing "flops" to induce a penalty call. This is a fine subject for satire, but involving more than just scripts of two anecdotes. Spıke Ѧ 00:36 23-Apr-11
- Delete. This poor article has been rescued by the shelter for unwanted articles, it doesn't need to be in any mean old main space. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 06:01, April 23, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Once again VFD faces one of its classic archrivals: ducks. There's just no concept on which to build anything.--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:17, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Dittos. Also: Nonsense year numbers (including 1337, of course), and "contrary to popular belief," an encyclopedia cliché. All of it having no point. Spıke Ѧ 01:29 22-Apr-11
- Obliterate. "Please excuse me while I Duck In A Bowl your face" = ??? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:36, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
- I like ducks.
1234 ~ 05:33, 22 April 2011
- Delete. - Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 07:19, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It's my dick in a box! --Scofield 09:37, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Iz moved the Duck in a Bowl pic to Chinese food, its rightful home when it was made by Goddess in heaven. Aleister 10:06 22-4-'11
- p.s. Then iz wrote an UnNews using the other pic. These are good pics!
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- While dry prose can make for wonderful funny reads, the content itself still needs to be funny. This... isn't.
1234 ~ 19:36, 18 April 2011
- Delete. As the site's VP for Dry Prose, dry is not the problem with this prose. Juvenile is the problem. Spıke Ѧ 23:47 18-Apr-11
- Delete. Has a few interesting flashes like Homework is the deadly enemy of Kid Power but the article looks half arsed at best. The writer of the article was only here for a couple of hours before vanishing so there is no likely hood it will get improved. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 17:02, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- It has a couple good bits and it could have been a great article, but it's not funny at all. -DeathBySnowman (talk)18:25, 22 April 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. This has been tagged a work in progress for three years. Furthermore, it hasn't been touched since February. It appears to have had no redeeming value to begin with. I think it's time to put it out of its misery. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 19:18, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Who knew that "penai" was the irregular plural of penis? How many more random, dumb, penis articles do we need? Creator went away two years ago. Spıke Ѧ 19:37 20-Apr-11
- Interesting... in my professional medical opinion, this is... stupid.
1234 ~ 02:34, 21 April 2011
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:06, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Not funny When I was serving my third tour of duty in 'Nam I lost some good friends at Penai. --Count of Monkey Crisco 04:33, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Propane! Starts of with a rather crass concept, deviates towards randumbo, and then returns to call penai....parasites? Ew... --Scofield 09:40, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- From the review: "The humour is based off the article being written (deliberately?) as non-sensical gibberish. This can be funny, but possibly gets close to the line of 'don't be stupid.'"
1234 ~ 19:11, 20 April 2011
- Delete. Okay, I get the pun; if you can "do" drugs, one must be able to "undo" them. Only, the page goes in an altogether different direction. It is HowTo:Do random self-destructive things. Spıke Ѧ 19:40 20-Apr-11
- Delete.--Count of Monkey Crisco 01:20, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! Untrue to its name, the article just tells you to go ahead and do drugs anyway... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:11, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Propane! Has nothing to do with the title. At best, it serves as a way to cyberbully drug addicts. --Scofield 09:44, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (6) |
- Worth a chuckle, and as far as categories go that's above and beyond the call of duty. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:28, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep This is exactly the type of categories that should be on Uncyclopedia. mAttlobster. (hello) 12:04, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep your stupid nominations in your pocket! MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 12:10, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I'm surprised this didn't become an in-joke or something. --Scofield 16:06, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep this stupid category because it's so stupid. Even nomming it, or voting for or against it, is ultimately stupid. The category is just stupid. But maybe funny too, if you get this sort of humour. Only a little though. Aleister 1:33 19-4-'11
- Keep. Per above. Not everything has to make sense to be funny. The whole point is that it doesn't make sense. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 01:53, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- I kind of like this, except it's stupid and has nothing in it, so instead of disposing of it outright, I brought it here so y'all might see it too and do whatever you feel inclined to it. Or not. You may now proceed to lynch me.
1234 ~ 05:17, 18 April 2011
- Delete. Category that doesn't categorize. All Uncyclopedia pages belong in it. Or not. Spıke Ѧ 10:53 18-Apr-11
- Delete. Pointless and no yuks. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 13:08, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:03, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Seriously, this is kind of pointless. If this is kept, some IP will probably see this and add every single Uncyc article to this category. For more information, see my comment below. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:00, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. per above. --Mn-z 23:12, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- You guys suck, voting keep and then not even putting anything more sensible in the category...
1234 ~ 16:04, 18 April 2011
- You suck with this dumb-fuck nomination. mAttlobster. (hello) 16:15, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- But you suck because there are things to suck on, and you've found them. Aleister 16:22 18-4-'11
- I'm sorry. I'll just qvfd the next one.
1234 ~ 17:02, 18 April 2011
- I guess that'll solve the problem of your thoughtless nominations being held to account. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:07, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- We'll lose some good categories, though.
1234 ~ 17:08, 18 April 2011
- You just do whatever you think will get you the most attention, I'm not wasting my time feeding your ego anymore. mAttlobster. (hello) 17:11, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- But it's very fragile! It needs your love, man... you're killing me.
1234 ~ 18:30, 18 April 2011
- STOP VOTING TO KEEP STUPID CATEGORIES! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 16:51, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- THIS IS NOT A STUPID CATEGORY! --Scofield 19:55, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- PROVE IT, BITCH! --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 14:46, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- IT'S STUPID STUPID HATE HATE HAT! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 22:58, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- This place isn't as funny as it used to be. mAttlobster. (hello) 23:27, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- And, with that, Mr. Lobster has hung out a {{Vacation}} sign on his user page. Spıke Ѧ 23:46 18-Apr-11
- Maybe I should have just gone with "CAPS LOCK!" instead of an old in-joke... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 01:38, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Apologies: I am literally going on holiday, wasn't being dramatic. mAttlobster. (hello) 10:06, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, okay. Glad to know I didn't cause someone to leave! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 11:49, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
- Does that mean we can delete the Beard article now? --Scofield 10:08, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (4) |
- Rewritten I removed the red links, rewrote the "Operations" section, and removed that confusing bit at the end. Any of you ready to flip now? --Scofield 16:29, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. (talk) 17:06, 18 April 2011
- Keep Scofield's done a good job tidying this up. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:09, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
- *Judge Foxy emerges from his chambers to vote Keep. Factual errors have been addressed and I think it's pretty funny now. Well done, Scofield. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:01, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- It's empty. The entire article is just a bunch of different ways of pointing that out.
1234 ~ 04:46, 18 April 2011
- Delete. That is not the article's problem, but that it is proudly hard to read. Spıke Ѧ 10:44 18-Apr-11
|
Comments |
- Comment. Just a comment while I deliberate: I read somewhere that Windows actually has an astronomical, but finite number of files it can hold in a drive's table of contents. So making infinite New Text Docs would eventually crash the machine, making the best part of this article complete nonsense. I'm sure Spike knows what I'm talking about. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 05:52, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- That the only real thing it is saying might be untrue is also not the article's problem. Spıke Ѧ 10:44 18-Apr-11
- The keepest of kepts. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:51, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- A few minutes ago sannse asked me to take a look at this article, because Wikia has been getting complaints that it is slander from the Yogen Fruz company. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:36, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Sadly, I created the article. I wasn't trying to be anti semetic, as I am a quarter Jewish myself. But delete it if you like. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 01:54, 22 April 2011
- I dunno about slander or any of that or whatnot, but I'll agree that is it is pretty offensive in how... well, how bad it is. Seriously, I'm offended. Can we delete it now?
1234 ~ 01:55, 22 April 2011
- Delete. Playing word games on the name of an ethnic group doesn't mean you hate all its members. The company presumably objects to the use of its logo, the assertion in the caption that there is something evil about it, and the association with Hitler; this I consider closer to "fair use" than slander, but agree there is an issue. The story takes a single pun to gruesome extremes, not unfunny but not compelling. Given that the author assents, let's kill it. I did not run it on the Front Page; I did add it to {{RecentUnNews}}. Spıke Ѧ 02:20 22-Apr-11
- Delete. Actually, it would become fairer use if it had been sufficiently modified to actually say "Frogen Yues" or however it's spelled. Then it would be a derivative parody, not exactly the original. Normally, I would say change or delete the logo instead of giving in to a corporation, but this article really isn't up to par. Since Lollipop has no objections, we should just get rid of it. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:24, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Just for the record, this is not something we are saying has to go, just asking you to look at... is it funny enough to justify keeping? pleaseandthankyou. -- sannse<staff/> (talk) 01:39, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, and also "offensive and anti-semitic", not "slander" ... but my feeling is that it is much worse than that: "unfunny" -- sannse<staff/> (talk) 01:41, April 22, 2011 (UTC)
- FYI, the last time someone from the real world protested about his organization's treatment in UnNews (the Reverend Zim ulator presiding), a new Letters to the Editor feature was created, the protest was reprinted in full, and it was responded to by verbally severing the flack's testicles and shoving them in his mouth. Spıke Ѧ 02:41 22-Apr-11
- And who can forget, especially those of us who weren't here at the time, the John Scherer episode. Feature. John Scherer, I mean, not Frozen Jews. Aleister Frogen Juden 3:12 22-4-'11
- I've heard about it. Don't forget the Garfield incident with the troll in Febraury. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 03:52, 22 April 2011
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- If random was funny...
1234 ~ 18:48, 20 April 2011
- Burninate! He also has two penises and superhuman erections... Yawn. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 18:53, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
- If random were funny, Lyrithya. But dealing with the British sports pundit with suggestions of beastiality [sic] and other sexual innuendo, isn't. Wikipedia shows that Atkinson is a repeat offender of the biggest crime in broadcasting: assuming the microphone is ever off; another case where reality is funnier than an Uncyclopedia article. Spıke Ѧ 19:47 20-Apr-11
- Random is inherently plural?
1234 ~ 02:27, 21 April 2011
- Delete. Not good enough to keep though the incident did kill Atkinson's career as a TV pundit and writing for the liberal/left leaning Guardian newspaper. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:10, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 12:45, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Pretty ugly as of now, but the introduction, and even the diabetes section, are rather good. --Scofield 15:09, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- Random, jumpy, and really rather terrible.
1234 ~ 16:55, 18 April 2011
- Yep (talk) 17:02, 18 April 2011
- Delete. Memes, templates, and an animation. Spıke Ѧ 20:09 18-Apr-11
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 17:24, April 20, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Cobbled together and held together with crud. Nah. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:26, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Removed some of the tacky stuff. I think it'll do now. --Scofield 15:12, April 19, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- He said it would be funny. It's not.
1234 ~ 04:49, 18 April 2011
- Geez... Really... Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 05:07, 18 April, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It's tediously tedious, as well as being boring, tedious and pointless. Did I mention it's tedious? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 05:42, April 18, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 17:05, 18 April 2011
- Delete. Strange article. Something meant for wikipedia but got on the wrong train and ended up here? --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:21, April 21, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Tedium is its point. Finnish Air Force spends World War II proudly renaming squadrons and re-sewing uniform badges. It is only the line that the Squadron may or may not have been the inspiration for Top Gun that suggests that the author really can't do humor. Spıke Ѧ 11:01 18-Apr-11
|