From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. This article clearly explains the logic of Pokemon. Unfortunately, it doesn't do much else. Anton (talk) 10:52, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Clearly written more to inform than to amuse, though it tries to do that in an amusing way (like precede the creator's name with "some asian guy," ha ha). Since 2009, many Anons have tried to help MaXDeAtH write a complete list of How I Feel about every Pokémon — and, by Section 5.4, a complete list of continuity errors. Spıke Ѧ 12:31 10-May-14
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:51, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Pokemon pants. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:14, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. The attempt was good and the concept promising, but the result isn't satisfactory. Anton (talk) 19:44, May 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. A political rant with canards (bomb-happy moron surrounded by boot-licking Generals) where the jokes should be. Spıke Ѧ 21:05 10-May-14
- Delete. Crap. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:51, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. There is a lot of stuff wrong with it so to cut a long story short it's absolutely shite --Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 16:31, June 4, 2014 (UTC)
- Anything that links the words "Bush" and "Logic" must go, no matter how good or bad. This I say. Aleister 14:55 4-6-14
- Delete. Add it to the tumbrel. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:15, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This article (an analog of a page at Wikipedia but with "Right Wing" added) has two themes: ridicule of right-wingers, and ridicule of specific Uncyclopedians and Anons. Ridicule is not humor by itself. Spıke Ѧ 23:40 29-May-14
- Delete. I agree with Spike. BassHero55 (Message me) 14:10, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. A lot of atheists are convinced that saying "Christians are wrong" is an actual, funny joke that stands for itself, and the same with "right-wingers are wrong". This article is no exception. ConCass2 (talk) 15:10, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete.--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:17, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. To ridicule something with evidence is fine Spike. This isn't ridiculing, I don't know what it quite is but it's a page full of rubbish at least. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:16, June 7, 2014 (UTC)
- It is not "fine" on a humor wiki, thus my chronic concern with articles with external links as evidence with which to convince the reader. Spıke Ѧ 10:36 7-Jun-14
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. The author says that non-British readers may not find it funny. I doubt that British readers will find it funny, either. Plus, the word "British" in the title is written without a capital letter. Anton (talk) 09:09, June 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. These two problems are easily corrected, but the obsession with british versus American doesn't stop there; and author Darwin of suburbia's view of british is: chavs and L33T. If this is supposed to all be a teenager's view, by way of ridiculing the teenager, the author didn't pull off the alternate-voice gimmick. On the way to the only content: The cliques at my school, and the "wars" between them. Spıke Ѧ 11:08 1-Jun-14
- Delete. Well at least one UnBrit doesn't find it funny --TheWikiMan026Up Red, White & Blue! Chater 19:05, June 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Listing badly, abandon ship. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:21, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Most of these aren't even remotely British. They're just Canis Canem Edit-style cliques with the word "British" in the title. "Stoners", "nerds" and "Emos" aren't British stereotypes, over here weed is for those who didn't choose the thing life, but insist the thug life chose them. We don't have cliques over here (well they're not obvious) because everyone wears school uniform. ConCass2 (talk) 07:59, June 7, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. This is a childish and unfunny article which should be deleted and/or re-written. The author(s) of this article should also spend some time reading HTBFANJS. BassHero55 (Message me) 14:01, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. A predictable magnet for ranting about Walmart's non-union status, the bankrupt Main Street businesses who couldn't match its price for toilet paper, the culture of manic consumption, and the consumers and employees who are exploited by being offered the best deal in town — most of it not very clever. But it had already gotten protection against Anon and newbie editing. Nominator's argument is for a clean-up, and he and I have done some. Spıke Ѧ 12:45 8-Jun-14
|
Comments |
- Of the many spellings of the store name, including those with asterisk and with star, let us align with the one the company itself is now using (reportedly, to match its website). Spıke Ѧ 12:46 8-Jun-14
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Made-up topic, no humor except the joy of referring indirectly to "turd." I deleted a list of 19 words that had grown overnight to 24. Spıke Ѧ 10:27 3-Jun-14
- Delete. I think the author read HTBSANJF rather than HTBFANJS--TheWikiMan026Up Red, White & Blue! Chater 19:10, June 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. This article is either a prank or it was written by third-graders. BassHero55 (Message me) 14:05, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Anton (talk) 14:56, June 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. This article is a stand alone turd. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:49, June 12, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Not funny. Random Nazi memes. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ScottPat (talk • contribs)
Delete. This is focused libel, not humor. Spıke Ѧ 12:17 27-May-14
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. The Nazi jokes (which are slightly relevant) are definitely overdone and the pictures are shabby, but it's a fairly decent article. ConCass2 (talk) 14:46, June 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. In honour of of Ade's partner Rik Mayall's very recent death, this article is as relevant as ever and must be rewritten!--|(get dtf) 15:55, June 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep (formerly Delete). Give ConCass2 the save. Spıke Ѧ 19:03 11-Jun-14
|
Comments |
- {{VFD}} placed and clock reset. Spıke Ѧ 12:17 27-May-14
- I've started a rewrite of this, but there is quite a lot and I don't want to fuck it all up. The main problem is the theme; Ade and Rik have made a career out of playing pathetic lower-class slobs (Ade's are always alcoholics), yet this article makes him look like a British Chuck Norris. ConCass2 (talk) 17:40, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
- I've rewritten the article now and removed the repetetive lists and memes. Check if this is still a bad article. ConCass2 (talk) 18:53, June 11, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. The article has some potential and a few good jokes, as well as a promising, even if not original comedy theme, despite it being quite mediocre generally. However, it's hard to imagine how to save it. I don't think the fake leader's name works well as a joke, but if it was changed to something else, the main comedy theme would be destroyed. Anton (talk) 16:12, June 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Article about a made-up character, which no one will look up and whose main comedy theme is, "no one knows and I don't give a fuck," must go. The absurd name is like a nonsense number: expected to be funny in its own right; Anon will assume it would be twice as funny if twice as long. Nominator is well-situated to salvage the good jokes and use them to pervert a biography of a real Russian. Spıke Ѧ 12:19 8-Jun-14
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:30, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:26, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. The author's vision of Uncyclopedia, if it was hijacked. I don't find anything funny. Anton (talk) 11:36, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Just plain stupid--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 11:44, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. More precisely, the author's vision of what the reader would see if Wikia abandoned the web address and a vulture offered it for sale. In any case: A replica of some other company's web page. No humor beyond a vague death wish for Uncyclopedia. Spıke Ѧ 12:51 8-Jun-14
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:30, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Ye Olde Navelism. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:36, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. What is this? Anton (talk) 11:38, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. This is too stupid for me to waste my words on--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 11:46, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. So, some past Uncyclopedian was offended by the fact that our main page is protected, and took a copy to play with. By all means, let's encourage them to write original comedy rather than manufacture in-jokes. Spıke Ѧ 12:15 8-Jun-14
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:30, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:35, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. WTF is this?--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 11:48, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
- I agree. Anton (talk) 12:26, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. What it is is one of several false starts of Pseudodragon52. Short and dumb; should have been userspaced in January 2013. He received a warning for another edit (which he moved to Talk:Forks when mainspacing this article). Spıke Ѧ 12:35 8-Jun-14
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:30, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Delete content and redirect page to Spoons. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:39, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
Delete. Intro is mechanical irony, and everything else is lists. Spıke Ѧ 00:42 11-Jun-14
- Delete. Not funny. Huge US bias. Far too informative just using the theme of "celebration" (not funny) to fill in the gaps between facts. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:24, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep (formerly Delete). Another save by Burritoqueen. ScottPat's complaint of US bias is common to many of our articles, and not fatal; my problems with the original are completely resolved. Spıke Ѧ 11:56 15-Jun-14
- Keep. Not so bad now. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:04, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- In fact, a lot of our politics articles, and the menu template shown here, are explicitly US-based. Some things here are, as ScottPat helped me explain to a newbie recently, and the only remedy is to have gotten to it first; or, of course, write a parallel one. Spıke Ѧ 12:23 15-Jun-14
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. This is too stupid to waste my words on--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 19:20, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The article contains nothing but a full stop. "Pages that look like the things they are about" are not absolution on total lack of skill. Spıke Ѧ 11:37 17-Jun-14
- Delete. Anton (talk) 16:35, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (3) |
- Are you kidding? This article is epic! --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 20:25, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
- A classic ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:07, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
- Per Frosty and Mimo Aleister 17:53 18-6-14
|
Comments |
- I get it--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 17:21, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete.--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 16:19, June 19, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Userspaced. This is the only contribution of suspiciously named new user Tessier1978. I warned him about vanity on his talk page, but seem to have mistakenly assumed he was typing to his own user page rather than into the encyclopedia. Spıke Ѧ 16:37 19-Jun-14
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete.--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 16:17, June 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Not humor but a shock page. Send it where Goatse went. Spıke Ѧ 16:30 19-Jun-14
- Redirect to nothing. Aleister 17:42 19-6-14
- Delete RIP Lollipop. Although a really terrible MS point crop hardly counts as shock. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:58, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Nothing to redirect. Anton (talk) 17:39, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete.--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 19:03, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No it's not funny and what the hell are liberal arts? Left-wing paintings? Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:13, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Use of the tumbleweeds meme is never-ending. "George W. Bush's brainstorms", "Obama's foreign-policy successes", "Nice Admins", and so on, and all the author is doing is stating a personal opinion "in a funny way." Start a politics blog, then. Spıke Ѧ 19:20 20-Jun-14
- Delete. A bit funny, but not original, or true. "Those of African descent" have had plenty major contributions to sciences, arts etc. But, of course, the point is that it's only slightly funny and doesn't amuse the reader much, because it's not original. Anton (talk) 19:53, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- I agree, but truth/falsity is a big non-goal. In the US, February is "Black History Month," a perennial public campaign to look away from the fact that a race that was in slavery for 80 years in part of the country will, through no fault of its own, not have its share of contributions to history. I think this orthodoxy is better humor material than the question of whether it is based on truth. Spıke Ѧ 20:25 20-Jun-14
- Delete. This page could be moved to the title "What is Funny About This Article" with equal results. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:33, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- ScottPat, the mere use of an Americanism does not automatically make an article deleteworthy. "Liberal arts" means the "learning considered essential for a free man." Spıke Ѧ 19:20 20-Jun-14
- Never said it did but never come across the term before. Thanks. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:23, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Think of it as a standing risk of collaborating with Yanks. It does, of course, further reduce the chances anyone will call up the page. Spıke Ѧ 19:28 20-Jun-14
|
Score: 2 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Bogs down with initial quotations before it begins to bog down with gamer inside jokes. Bonus points for a disclaimer warning the reader not to expect to understand it. Spıke Ѧ 12:02 15-May-14
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:51, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
Kept..no consensus. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 05:09, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
- Anon dispatched the quotecruft. Spıke Ѧ 01:17 16-May-14
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- An average Uncyclopedia article on a TV series. Which means, Delete. Anton (talk) 09:11, June 1, 2014 (UTC)
- In fact, I don't think "average" means Delete. "Awful" means Delete. Spıke Ѧ 13:09 22-Jun-14
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep.I don't watch the Walking Dead and they don't air it over here, but that article made me laugh. ConCass2 (talk) 14:45, June 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 11:25, June 22, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Pieman251 set the tone for this article from 2013: The creators are fat! No one reads the source book! In other words, I think the subject matter simply sucks! However, I'll defer voting, in view of the other cruft on this page, as there may be one or more active Uncyclopedians who would like to fix this article on a series that is still in active production on AMC. Spıke Ѧ 11:14 1-Jun-14
|
Score: 2 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. I don't get how is this supposed to be funny in any why or any form--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 21:20, June 3, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Page has only one joke, which is achieved at <insert name here>'s expense. Spıke Ѧ 21:41 3-Jun-14
- Delete. Anton (talk) 14:54, June 7, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. If what Spike said was correct then <insert name here> should be ashamed of themselves. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:30, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Since the article is all about me, I have to vote to keep. Although when you look it may be all about you, which is metaphysically possible in a quantum world. Aleister 14:53 4-6-14
- Keep If <insert name here> thinks this should be deleted, <insert name here> sucks. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 01:59, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. We already have Alternate Universe, so what's the point of this? The only one I see is that you can make hundreds of different reskins of Uncyclopedia's main page. Anton (talk) 11:31, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Moreover, most of these require special rendering rules (all of which are taking up space in the browser cache of your computer — see Forum:Edits to Common.js). This is derivative, insider "humor," mostly of the form, "Look what I did!" Spıke Ѧ 12:39 8-Jun-14
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:30, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep.Don't see anything wrong with it--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 11:43, June 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Seems harmless. Browser caches are easily emptied. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:58, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
- But when they are, Uncyclopedia obligingly reloads them, including this junk, the next time you view a page. Spıke Ѧ 13:23 19-Jun-14
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Article-length deconstruction of arbitrary gibberish. Trade to Illogicopedia for future draft picks. Spıke Ѧ 00:19 9-Jun-14
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:24, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete.Why anyone would want to keep this, I don't know. ConCass2 (talk) 19:00, June 21, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep.Nothing wrong with it--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 16:16, June 10, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. for the audio files. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:57, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. On the midway between comedy and not comedy. Anton (talk) 13:30, May 17, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't agree that it is an Edge Condition at all. Its comedy theme is oriental caricatures plus (ironically?) American racism. Hint: Hentai mentioned in first sentence. Spıke Ѧ 13:36 17-May-14
|
Keep (1) |
Keep. I loved the first picture and decided I'd have to save the article just for that. Re-writing. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:51, May 27, 2014 (UTC)
- Get on with it, then. Spıke Ѧ 00:30 11-Jun-14
- I thought I had time but I didn't. I started something, probably just as bad as the original. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:08, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep.--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 11:23, June 22, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Kept Over a month, no consensus. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:49, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. No Comments--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 17:36, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Funny! Anton (talk) 17:37, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Cutesy word association? What about original comedy writing? Spıke Ѧ 17:46 20-Jun-14
- Wut ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:39, June 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 16:08, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Deleted, 5-0. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 16:10, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. WTF?--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 19:16, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. What is funny about an Illogicopedian contributing crap and watching it get tagged/huffed? Spıke Ѧ 11:38 17-Jun-14
- Delete. Anton (talk) 16:36, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:13, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. His first article to get huffed on Uncyclopedia. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:53, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
Let me just say, that as the author of this article, I don't care if you delete it. Honestly, I only ported it over here as a joke to see how you guys reacted to it. I really didn't mean to offend anyone. So yeah, delete it if you feel like it. --T3 08:39, June 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Cheers mate (or is it "Bananas"?) Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:53, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. The article does have a lot to do with Nihilism--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 19:13, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. A stubby article on yet another Wacky Religion. We vote these away before breakfast, and that's what time it is here. Spıke Ѧ 11:40 17-Jun-14
- Delete. Anton (talk) 16:37, June 17, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (3) |
- What can I say, I like it. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 20:27, June 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Mimo has the eye of a movie critic and the ears of a fisherman. Aleister 00:15 19-6-14
- Keep. but rename it into "Nihilism" and replace "famous members" with something like "famous nihilists". This article is far more interesting than the already existing nihilism page anyway. ConCass2 (talk) 16:25, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
- I am not sure it's possible. Nothing redirects to Nihilism, and when you type nothing, you don't expect to see an article on Nihilism. And plenty of authors who link to it base a joke on the fact that it is empty, so this would make hundreds of links pointless. Anton (talk) 17:40, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
- In addition, Nihilism is a feature (even if it's not very visible). Does this change your opinion? Anton (talk) 17:43, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Vote closed. Spıke Ѧ 19:52 24-Jun-14
|
Score: -2 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
Delete.--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 16:56, June 19, 2014 (UTC)
Delete. Type in a saying, see a photo? What about original comedy writing? Spıke Ѧ 17:23 19-Jun-14
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep (formerly Delete). Now rewritten. Spıke Ѧ 14:23 24-Jun-14
- Keep, before Delete It's better now Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 19:42, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- While I can't tell if this article is good or not by admin standards, check the history; the page was blanked because some vandal thought it was "shit" (to quote the summary) and replaced it with a single photo. It used to actually be an article. ConCass2 (talk) 18:06, June 19, 2014 (UTC)
- The rules at the top of the page ask nominators to search the history for a better version before nominating. If you have found one, please revert it. Spıke Ѧ 18:12 19-Jun-14
- PS--I see the version you're talking about, and I'd vote to delete it too: a Polack joke followed by lengthy, poorly coded listcruft. Spıke Ѧ 18:16 19-Jun-14
- Kept ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 04:29, June 25, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Not a bad article and is funny in places. That's just that I think that rules should be the same for everyone. Anton (talk) 11:30, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Good article, but as Anton says, the rules apply to everyone so Un-Vanitise —The preceding unsigned comment was added by TheWikiMan026 (talk • contribs)
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. If this were a 2005 article by Chronarion/Stillwaters, it would fall under UN:VAIN, which I'd vote to enforce even against the founders of Uncyclopedia. But they are notorious, and this is a 2009 article by Zenxan et al., and is funny in places. Spıke Ѧ 11:50 24-Jun-14
- Keep. Ye Olde Navelism - but in this case since these are the 'Fondling Fathers' of this site...keep. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:33, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Eh... Not really vanity in my view. He founded this site/has his real mentioned on Wikipedia. so... ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 08:42, June 25, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Vote closed. A Royal Flush of Admins? Spıke Ѧ 10:48 25-Jun-14
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete."Sorry!" is a TV show. This is some random advert. If you must keep the advert, at least change the name of the page to something like "Uncyclopedia+" for common sense. ConCass2 (talk) 19:03, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. It is also the name of a Parcheesi-like board game, and a later electronic implementation. So you call for an article on that, and you get what? a mock-up of the website-name-for-sale screen, with no humor but randomness. Spıke Ѧ 19:11 23-Jun-14
- Delete. Anton (talk) 10:50, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No comments--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 16:40, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 07:51, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 10:43, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Deleted arbitrarily One liner with a broken image that should have been put on QVFD back in September. No need at all to have a vote over QVFD material. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 11:40, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 12:24, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I don't know if you wanted to QVFD thinking it a useless subpage, or if you judged it as a separate article, but it's useful, because though the Scam letter doesn't link to any of its subpages a single time, they are still needed as they work as templates (I know, I myself am confused by this structure). I tried to put all the content on one page, but it didn't work. If the question is about humour, one reason you might not find it funny is that maybe you read it as an independent page, which it isn't. It's supposed to be an answer to another letter, which is hard to find just like that, but which you'll find easily if you just start reading Scam letter. I hope that this explanation clarified something, because I know that I can be very confusing sometimes. Anton (talk) 14:48, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- TheWikiMan, could you, please, remember to tag the article you nominate here with the {VFD} template? There is a chance I wouldn't have known it was here, if not for Spike's message on my talkpage. Anton (talk) 14:48, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Vote closed. This is a subpage of a work that can be VFD'd. It was nominated without explanation nor evidence that nominator followed the path to its root. Spıke Ѧ 15:15 26-Jun-14
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- This article is too informative and helpful, and is a homage to the game rather than a lampoon. The article occasionally cracks a joke, but they are more like the sort of banter you might hear YouTube gamers make, rather than remixes of history and claims that someone else invented these things. I therefore can't see a future for the article on this site.--Everyotherusernamewastaken (talk) 12:13, May 31, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:30, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- After 600 plus hours with two delete votes maybe this should be kept. And it seems like a full page, formatted and illustrated well. I have no interest in reading it, but you had me at informative and helpful and homage, nothing wrong with any of those critters. Aleister 12:17 26-6-14
|
Comments |
- EpicWinner spent a month writing tributes to his favorite videogames with epic conflicts between WINNERs and LOSERs that read like fanboy rants. I warned him on his talk page. Nominator sums up how most readers will react to this page — but it can be salvaged. Spıke Ѧ 12:36 31-May-14
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. I cannot even summarise my impression of it. Anton (talk) 09:05, June 1, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The 2006 contribution of Thetoastman morphs the dumb threat-alert color code with — the fight against gayness, stopping to remind us of how dumb Bush was. No other humor at all. Spıke Ѧ 11:03 1-Jun-14
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 06:30, June 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 11:24, June 22, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Comment. I guess this is still relevant, just needs to drop the Bush business. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:20, June 6, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete and replace. Article from 2012 is ranty and opinionated — explicitly criticizing Islam rather than joking about it — and should give way to the playful new article by Sog1970 now misspelled at Boko Harum because it is based on Procol Harum. Spıke Ѧ 18:26 19-Jun-14
- Delete. What Spike said.--Sog1970 (talk) 18:39, June 19, 2014 (UTC)
- I like the Boko Harum name, but if Sog and Spike are for this, aye! So Nay! Delete. Aleister 22:29 19-6-14
- Delete. Remove and replace with Soggy contribution. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:41, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Replaced. Spıke Ѧ 12:33 26-Jun-14
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. WTF?--Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 12:43, June 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. As I voted last July: "The article's talk page has the authors patting themselves on the back on their subtlety in inventing a new meme for the website, and in breaking the previous record for adding junk categories to an article. The result is not encyclopedic, funny, or a good read, but yet another page that pranks the reader for the amusement of the authors." Spıke Ѧ 16:48 24-Jun-14
- Delete. I have no idea what Aleister is on about, but it sounds like a good idea for a Harlan Ellison book. Seriously, he needs to team up with the Chiodo brothers to make this a film. But even then, this article is crap. ConCass2 (talk) 18:08, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- A masterpiece of mirth. With deep meaning. TheWikiMan, please study the page for awhile and see if you can spot the story (gives time for the study). Ok, see, an esteemed anthropologist goes to the zoo and lectures his class about the chimpanzees and how primitive they are. The apes throw their poop at him, and within moments he is devolved into an ape, scoops poop up as it's coming out of him, and throws it back. It's a book-length dissertation in a few words. You are lucky to have read it. And SPIKE, please read the categories, every one of them is pertinent to the page. It's fun that it has so many, but talk page discussions assured an agreement to keep the categories relating to the page. The three ending categories are the best. I am but a humble servant of the poop throwing monkeys, Aleister 17:35 24-6-14
- Keep. A Classic. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 00:51, June 26, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This article has nothing to do with the KR, every year mentioned is ridiculous (the first year mentioned is 10,450 BC), and it drones on and on about irrelevant countries to the point it doesn't mention Cambodia until a small paragraph at the end. I know hippies like to think that third world genocide is better than the US, but this is pushing it even for them. ConCass2 (talk) 20:23, June 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Nonsense dates, though they instantly break the "encyclopedia" cover, are easily corrected. But there is nothing here except a parade of Holocaust Memes and gibberish. Spıke Ѧ 13:34 19-Jun-14
- Remove, Redirect to Tea Party sub-section "If they ever get into controlling positions of power". Cambodia? I thought this was an article about make-up? Aleister 17:39 19-6-14 p.s. hmmm, just thought about it. "Make-up" or "Cosmetics" would be a pretty good redirect.
- Delete. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 17:23, June 25, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. and replace with Spike's article, when it's complete. Anton (talk) 11:32, June 28, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- If it does get deleted, would it be best to replace it with a redirect to Pol Pot? If someone were to rewrite this page, the jokes would most likely mirror whatever is on the Pol Pot page, except that it's about his organisation instead of an individual. And if you don't mind me asking, what does make-up or cosmetics have to do with Pol Pot? ConCass2 (talk) 18:15, June 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Rouge is a face cosmetic. Spıke Ѧ 18:30 19-Jun-14
- Am working on a replacement article. Spıke Ѧ 17:19 26-Jun-14
- Just a question: I think the talkpage of the article explains the article's concept fairly well. Have you seen it? There might be some useful ideas. Anton (talk) 11:32, June 28, 2014 (UTC)
- I had not, but I like the article even less now seeing more clearly a number of coded hints to a serious anti-war message. At any rate, I took it in a different direction entirely. Now replaced. Spıke Ѧ 12:37 28-Jun-14
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Not funny. Anton (talk) 08:14, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. This does nothing more than take the theme of nakedness and apply it to the article itself, for which we already have Nihilism. As we were told that Bush, one-on-one, was more incisive than we ever saw him in public — and that Obama is cool and competent — the fable of a royal courtier telling the people the emperor was dressed if only they were smart enough to see it, begs for comparison with modern spinmeistering. Spıke Ѧ 11:20 23-Jun-14
- Delete. " --Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 20:55, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Pants/No Pants. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:46, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. This article is funny. Whoever nominated it must not be able to read the text inside. ConCass2 (talk) 15:45, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 13:46, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Ain't bad. Not saying it's good, but it ain't bad. Aleister 17:38 24-6-14
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. What can I say? A noob article. Anton (talk) 13:54, June 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. If BILLYSGRANDMA had a point in creating this in 2008, it was merely to ridicule noobs who are bad editors. But articles that "look like the thing they are about," when that is bad articles, are simply bad. Spıke Ѧ 14:00 23-Jun-14
- This should be moved to QVFD Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 15:35, June 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. All this needs is an "Ugly" template. Oh yeah, we replaced the Ugly Template, because it was ugly. So this should go too. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 07:43, June 27, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Vanity, attack, stupidity & unfunniness or in other words Delete. Sir TheWikiMan026 CUN,UmP, (Chatter) 09:47, June 25, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I haven't read the entire article - only the beginning and the end, but it is enough for me. Anton (talk) 10:24, June 25, 2014 (UTC)
- "Great job, stupid! You're gonna die now!" Author amuses himself by ranting at reader. Spıke Ѧ 10:51 25-Jun-14
- Delete. I read the entire thing, and I think 2 points of my IQ got sucked into the article and are gone now. It's that stupid. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 07:40, June 27, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|