Uncyclopedia:FFS/archive1

Note: Users listed here are all included in Category:FFSWinner

Cs1987

Score: +1

• Strong For - I just hate this asshole. Infinite ban. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Banaan

Score: +5

• Infinite Ban - Because he's one of them. --AAA! (AAAA) 08:24, 30 November 2006 (UTC)
• Big fat tick - No more ED fascists! --thematrixeætsyou, the ultimate (talk) (flames) 08:19, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
• Annihilate this vermin. --General Insineratehymn 08:12, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
• Get MegaMan To Delete HIM!--Jamesryanjcrjcr 08:43, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 13:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Mr. Briggs Inc.

Score: +7

• Nom and For. His userpage is incoherent. -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 12:56, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Needs to comb his hair, put on some pants, and decide what he's gonna do with his life. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• For, because. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 07:50, 29 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong against His user page is funnier than YOU! GSPbeetle ^{complains Vandalisms} 11:07, 2 November 2006 (UTC)
• For His userpage is just confusing! Themuppetshow 17:45, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For possibly retarded 04:56, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
• For His userpage probably takes up half of uncyclopedia! -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) - 19:06, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

*Comment So Does your sig. Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 19:17, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

• Fixing all rouge sigs...

• For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 13:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Ghelæ

Score: +7

• Nom ænd For deserves every second of banning hæ gets. Doesn't know what "FFS" stands for. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 17:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Whines as much as a Democratic Liberal & shats himself.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 03:59, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• Frop. Hæy, you wænt mæ bænnæd?.. I'm tæking you with mæ. -- Imrælizæd æææææ! 00:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• For-- infinite ban for abuse of mod powers, intolerance, and lack of humor or insight--Countjulian 21:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Hasn't made it easy enough for people to steal his sig.--Wit (tawk) 07:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
• For Because he wants it!-- Sir Severian (Sprich mit mir!) 19:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• For per Severian. Mr. Predictable 14:10, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against -- Soul101 ~_MA^REPENT! 14:17, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• For Voted for me to get banned, and has an "æ" in his name, an ED trademark. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 20:08, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

Tom mayfair

Score: -1 ^_^

• strongly for
• STRONGLY FOR- He is apparently a penis
• Agree He's a Communist and he's not funny but his mother thinks he is.! User:Tom mayfair/Sig 07:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
• For can't even make the first letter of his surname a capital. Tut, tut, tut. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 17:53, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• For Infinite Ban.--Jtaylor1 09:41, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
• BAN. That's what FFS is all about. -- The Colonel (talk) 13:51, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• For, only because he wants it. Otherwise, he's cool and always votes for my stuff. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:01, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. A pathetic soul. Too bad each of my votes counts as 600,000 regular votes. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Aganist - --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 03:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against No one that devoted to communism can be bad
• Strong Against Theres nothing that bad about communists, and besides, he's made one or two decent pictures.-Anonymous Signed Votes Only
• Against Плашки коммунизма этот год.--Walter Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia |wanna Talk? 02:31, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against In Soviet Russia, ban votes against YOU! DarthMichigan 00:58, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against - I like him. Too bad each of my votes counts as 600,000 regular votes aswell (Two can play at that game, emc!). --AAA! (AAAA) 11:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Against- What you going to do about it? -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) -19:23, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Don't ban Helpful, and nominated for Uncyclopedian of the month --GAMESPOT=666 00:57, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

Jack mort

Score: -3

• For creating this, redundant to Uncyclopedia:Ban Patrol. For copying {{VFH}} to {{FFS}} without removing the stupid bits. For being Jack mort. --Splaka 22:12, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Agree. --⇔ Sir Mon€¥$ign^STFU F@H|NS|+S 22:14, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Jack is a cornerstone of the uncyc world. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I don't believe he's done enough to deserve this yet. Must try harder. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 13:32, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Hamster The world will end if JackMort is banned. Do it! Sliferjam 23:43, 17 June 2006 (UTC)
• For He recently did something to one of my articles, can't remember what though. --Mr Gridenko 11:59, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• No, that was me. And I NRV'd it. At least I think it was yours. Anyway, PWN INDEFINATELY. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:56, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Nay Seems like an OK dude, on IRC at least. DaBlade (Click here to bitch. :)) 20:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against, cause he's cool.--TKF 22:20, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Nay seems to be a good enough bloke. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 04:26, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Kill some puppies first. --Hhamdy283 23:46, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against Was able to raionaly explain why he voted against my image. Now I'm returning him the favor. Not that this page matters... --Sir Zombiebaron 17:47, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Aganist --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 13:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Mhaille

Score: -2

• For Killing off a page for "vanityshite" again and again and again. Ganondorf3345 08:59, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• For Killing off a page for "vanityshite" --User:MilesTailsPrower 21:15 29 December 2006 (UTC)
• For banning or page for vanity shite again, and again, and again! its not vain! there are loads of us doing it so screw you man!
• For BAN BAN BAN, SHAME HE'S AN ADMIN! --User:Suilven 12:24 1 october 2006 (UTC)
• For banning him before he became an admin. --KATIE!! 19:51, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• For. much too northern and a golfer - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:33, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. Banning Mhaille? No way. It would be like... turning over a stone and not finding a centipede there. -- Swami A. Suresh 12:17, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against. That is Bat Fuck Insane. Banning Mhaille is like banning homosexuality from construction. It just can't be done.--Emmzee 02:18, 13 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For. - Unless this actually is for real, in which case I'm actually Against --Olipro Anchor CUN (Harass) 00:53, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• It's Peanut butter jelly time! Talk to the burrito. Sliferjam - #1UN - You got something to say? - JAM! - I'm special. 14:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
  • By the way, that's a nay Sliferjam - #1UN - You got something to say? - JAM! - I'm special. 14:47, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Nay See my comment on JackMort ^. DaBlade (Click here to bitch. :)) 20:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• BLOCK INDEFINATELY. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:58, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. He gave me my first award. --Sbluen 01:31, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against He's done quite a lot for the good of Uncyc, at least more than I. Also, he's part of my inner circle; I cannot bear to see a Brother banned. What did he do that's so bad in the first place? --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Ban Him but only cause he can unban himself, making banning him a useless joke. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:44, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against He's been nothing but funny! --PiOfFive 20:20, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Against - He's a helpful person. I like him. I don't see why he should be banned --Micoolio101 03:16, 28 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
• Against. He rocks. --Hhamdy283 23:40, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Ban.yeah!Signed votes only.
• Against to ban Mhaille would be to fuck a wild goose; neither are very fun, both are messy, and both are probably illegal. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:01, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
• ForHe huffed my page and somebody who is actually funny found it good. 2/2 people can't be wrong. --The Cyber Mage 04:10, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• 4 He Huffed my first article within seconds of me posting, if all articles were huffed where would we be? That's right - nowhere. --Jonshipman
• Ban Ban this guy. Signed votes only.
• For The man stole my sig! -- Sir Mafagafo  (talk to me) 23:24, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
• Against Why bother? -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) - 19:18, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• I DISApprove This Message, 20:07, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
• Against Poorly written articles are huffed, users get pissed, since when is an Admin huffing an article that sucks such a crime?
• Against I like spending more time criticizing users than creating articles. --AmericanBastard 23:18, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Against --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 13:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• For bastard keeps fucking deleting stuff that i write, even though its fucking hilarious

Sliferjam

Score: +4

• Nom - you can't just go around trying to whore yourself as NOTM and impersonate people... biatch! --Olipro Anchor CUN (Harass) 00:57, 18 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - How dare he impersonate me! I say huff his ass User:Jsonitsac/sig13:55, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

• You want to do what to my ass?!?

• For How dare he! If I was him, I would kill myself! Ban him! Oh, wait. That's me! AGAINST, AGAINST! Sliferjam 14:32, 20 June 2006 (UTC)
• For - he made a kitten cry. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 23:27, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
• BAN INDEFINATELY. Ok, maybe that was a bit excessive. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 15:55, 23 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against. He's not so bad once you get to know him... -- SonicChao ^Babbel!_Contribs 20:33, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Nay - What SonicChao said. DaBlade (Click here to bitch. :)) 20:44, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
• Against I thought the impersonation votes were actually kinda funny... --SubPOP ^talk F@H 13:30, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• What?! No way!! He's nice, if mad. Mind you, I can't talk. Anyway, the fake votes were funny.
  ﺹﺻﺽﻂ
• For Ban the boy--TKF 18:07, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Actually, I withdraw my vote for a more ban-able candidate--TKF 18:05, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• For He's like poison to the machine. Making fake votes isn't funny, just disruptive and undemocratic. --Señor DiZtheGreat  CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 18:31, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• For cause he's whoring himself out to win UGotM. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Only for a week-long ban. --thematrixeætsyou, the ultimate (talk) (flames) 21:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)

Spang

Score: -7

• Nom and for AGAINST - You are no commander, you are a threat to the mission! Your methods are stupid, your intellegence is stupid, your progress has been STUPID! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated! (A quick reminder, I am exercising my freedom of speech by doing this on my home computer and thusly can NOT be punished for my opinion. If punished, you WILL be sued.) - Sliferjam - #1UN - You got something to say? - JAM! - I'm special. 23:54, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

Comment: Oh yeah? I'm going to hunt you down and forcibly remove that opinion from you. Freedom of speech my ass! • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:05, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

• Against. John Cage and Water powered bus are reason enough. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 00:06, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against Why ban admins? They can unban themselves, fool. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:54, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

You will pay for your questions! - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 22:00, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• For banning, even though he caⁱ  _^n unpwn himself too easily.
• Against. He's okay for a bastard.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 06:51, 28 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against His userpage is awesome Tuck99 08:28, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against I see no point... -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) -19:30, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Zombiebaron

Score: +1

• Nom and for, because he's an undead nay-saying ginger-loving canadian. - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 22:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. He already is a useless gobshite and he was banned by Splaka. He doesn't need another ban or useless award. --Sbluen 00:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

Acctually I've been banned more then just that once, sept those times I was banned because of someone else's wrong doing (or cause Money don't like edit collisions). --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:50, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

• For one of those pimp-tastic 5 second bans. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For, and ban Zmobiebaron aswell. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 17:49, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• Against. and might I point out that as a non-actor, I have no clue what the fuck you are talking about.--User:Tom mayfair/Sig 06:55, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Hmmm...it seems that someone takes votes a little bit too personally? --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:31, 28 August 2006 (UTC)

Ha! -- 15:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

For the sake of... I used his user page's code on my user page while it was still a construction site. The site was the connection point of my project that is currently VFD'd in a bowl of craps Sir General Minister G5 FIYC UPotM [Y] #21 F@H KUN

• Against Don't let them have what they want. -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 19:51, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Col.swordman

Score: +13

• Nom and for - for:
  • being an arrogant jerk.
  • starting a nosensical flamewar in a nonsensical forum.
  • making aggressive bullet points like this.
  • vandalising recreated vanity.
  • vandalising Sandbox.
  • hating nerds and geeks. (These people are good-looking, humourous, stylish pVVnin9 13375. Stop hating them n00b! lololololol!!!111111ONE1111ELEVEN11)

-- The Colonel (talk) 22:03, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

• For Screw sympathy votes! ~ T. (talk) 00:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• For infinite ban! __ ~   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 22:48, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Up yours, punk! ~ Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 22:49, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• For Go to Hades! - Imrealized 23:06, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
• FOR KEEP BENSON!! KEEP WORSHIPPING HIS EXCELLENCE FOR AT LEAST ONE WHOLE FRIGGIN' YEAR!!! ~ User:Nintendorulez 08:44, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Stab it with a stealy knife --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 14:51, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• For. Sir C  Holla | CUN --20:33, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. DNFtT. --The King In Yellow (Talk to the Dalek.) 19:52, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I need an archrival, and this guy seems to be the one. Crazyswordsman 17:32, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. If my vote counts, and there's not some rule against my voting, I don't see anything that he's done that other people here haven't done already.. --Joe!/TALK/CONTRIBS/F@H 21:19, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
• Against. death to benson, long live the colonel! - Jack Mort | TALK | MUN | F@H - 19:28, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Hell no! He keeps me honest.--Procopius 13:36, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
• For annoys me by being human. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 17:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. Infinite ban for being an arrogant, unfunny asshole.--TKF 18:08, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• For infinite ban for being intolerant, arrogant, unfunny, and most of all taking the internets(and especially uncyclopedia) way too seriously--Countjulian 19:42, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
• For. I'm God. You are not. -- Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 01:34, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Touché. -- 15:09, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• For. Banning him would be a fair punishment for being an arrogant, unfunny asshole. --General Insineratehymn 20:58, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I'm not really in a position to comment, of course, but on the face of it he seems like a nice guy. --Flyingfeline 09:52, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Self-defeating emo vote-rigging for. Yeah, bite me. -- The Colonel (talk) 06:49, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
• Ban!: This is an arduous, dangerous, deep, difficult, far-reaching, fateful, formidable, grave, grievous, grim, hard, heavy, important, laborious, major, meaningful, menacing, momentous, operose, pressing, severe, significant, sobering, strenuous, threatening, tough, ugly, unamusing, unhumorous, urgent, weighty and pointless vote for this complete moron. -- The Colonel (talk)

• Comment In a vain attempt to keep my whatever is left of my integrity intact, I'd like to point out that I did not post this comment directly above^. So I've removed my signature from it. While many of the words in it were written by me, they were copied and pasted by strange hands from my "But Seriously..." article (currently on VFH! Vote now!) where you will find them in much more congenial and happier surroundings than they appear above. My sig was then added ... yes! .... added! .... by those self-same hands. They were not my hands, which are not nearly as hairy and have clean fingernails. My hands were in fact elsehwhere at the time, engaged in activities that I dare not relate here for fear of offending those with sensative natures. I would also like to assure readers that if I wanted to imply that someone was a complete moron, I would use a much more elegant and witty turn of phrase than "complete moron". Just protecting the brand name here. Nothing more to see. Move on now. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 09:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

• Infinite Ban.--Jtaylor1 11:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. --Hhamdy283 23:44, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Infinite plus one ban for disrespecting BENSON. --User:Nintendorulez 18:44, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. Name-copier. I was here first, foo! Swordmaster 03:49, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
• For I'll go with the crowd -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 19:53, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Imrealized

Score: +8

• Nom and HUGE FOR - No real reason, but if you want one I'll say I don't like his jerkoff name, I don't like his jerkoff face, I don't like his jerkoff behavior and I don't like 'im. Jerkoff. -- User:Malibu Chief of Police 04:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• Ja. But I just want the money. -- Uli Kunkel 04:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• Little Shit! - Do you see what happens when you fuck a stranger's article in the ass? Do you?? -- 216.195.219.50 04:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• WTF? Would you all just chill out, man? -- Imrealized ...hmm? 04:24, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• For, why not? ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 09:31, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional for: only if he's opped first so he can unban himself. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 09:34, 17 August 2006 (UTC)
• BAN. It's like Lenin said... -- Walter S. 00:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Comment - I am the walrus. -- Donnie the Strike King 00:59, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

• Ban him so he won't touch himself ever again. -- The Colonel (talk) 13:17, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
• Ah fuck it, let's go bowling. --Sir Hardwick Fundlebuggy (Bleat) 09:19, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For. Asshole. Don't know why I think that, though. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:30, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

Hardwick Fundlebuggy

Score: +0

• Nom and totally FOR - for being the author of 9 featured articles, for being WotM of August 2006, and for being Hardwick Fundlebuggy. -- The Colonel (talk) 08:26, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against. And tag the user next time, if you want to him nominated to be bannned.--Jtaylor1 11:30, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
• For in the hopes that he expands on Hardwick Fundlebuggy's Prison Journal. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:02, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
• Against In the hopes that this page goes away for ever. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:50, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• For as per Zmobiebaron. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 10:52, 14 October 2006 (UTC)
• against To Continue the pattern. -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 19:56, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

§ǚρωξλ£μĦΦφ≈€ƏξßÐÆØΞ Squiggle

Score: +7 Annoying Instances of the Pseudo-Letter §

• Self Nom Because I want to see who wants to ban me. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 00:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Me! --The Colonel (talk) 18:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

• For Shame. This is for rooting out my enemies, not Benson's enemies. However, this automatically makes you one of my greatest foes. You're dead to me now. jk lol wtf roflmfao syfu-- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

• For, because the admins don't watch this page so you could probably have 500 votes for and you wouldn't be banned. ~ Ghelæ ^talk_contribs 10:03, 27 October 2006 (UTC)
• inFormally- Because of the attic greek curse word in your username...and the rest of the gibberish that I had to try pronouncing in my head every time I saw it.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 00:06, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• For 'cause his sig used to be cool and I miss it. User:Wehpudicabok/sig 17:52, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• For For being one of the many conspirators in the rigging of the votes on my image,

Chickenbox. 12:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

• against i'm bored144.134.65.29 20:22, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• For Hundred and Forty For Bilky Asko ^{Talk Here} 19:47, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. Absolute filth. He is the bottom of the barrel, the scum of the earth, the bane of mankind. His very existence sickens me. He is not only a waste of oxygen and organs, but one of the moust foul, bile, and horrid creatures ever put on God's green earth. With people like him, it's no wonder don't bother to cure cancer. An absolute disgrace to all carbon-based lifeforms. When I think about this man, I die a little inside. He is nothing. God be praised the day that he dies. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 02:59, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

• It warms my icey, blackened heart to see young ones like you get so enthusiastic. Most of you just smoke weed and complain about the weather. Oh, wait. I'm younger than you. Piss off, old man! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 02:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

• FOR HE ALWAYS RUNS AWAY WHEN I TRY TO STEAL HIS TROUSERS! THATS NOT USUAL IS IT? IF YOU GO ONTO A RANDOM STREET AND PULL DOWN SOMEONES TROUSERS AND WEAR IT, THEY SAY "WHY THANK YOU". BUT NOOOOOO. SQUIGGLE ALWAYS HAS TO HAVE HIS PRECIOUS TROUSERS. LOOK AT ME SQUIGGLE! IM PERMANENTLY WITHOUT THEM! --» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 23:06, 16 February 2007 (UTC) AND OH YEAH, /ME STEALS SQUIGGLES TROUSERS.

• You won the battle, but you haven't won the war! /me puts a plastic grocery bag where his trousers were and where his underwear probably should be. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 06:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

• Against --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 13:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

e|m|c

Score: +3 mocha cappuccinos

• N+F. Obnoxious crack-baby, probably a sex-offender in a past life - jack mort | cunt | talk - 03:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against. ~ Reasonable, logical, personable, and sober more often than not, which cannot be said of his detractors. :) Don't vote drunk, kids. ~ T. (talk) 03:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against - At least he's better than Jack mort; too bad the same can't be said for Jack mort. Jack mort is definitely worst than Jack mort. --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 04:16, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. Because this user went out & bought 2 chinchillas & neither of them can make a cappuccino. That is like false advertising. Shame on you, e|m|c. 12:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
• Conditional For; If e|m|c changes his name from Electrified Mocha Chinchilla to English Mariachi Crew, or something else of that outlandish sort, I'll vote Against. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:26, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. 24-year ban.--Jtaylor1 03:41, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• For --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 13:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

*.*.*.*

Score: +2

• Nom/For No worthwhile contributions. Also believed to be the IP range of several major vandals including the crackhead and Jimbo on Wales. --18:47, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• The Conniving Bastard! May his underwear rot and his dog be kicked by a man with a sharp boot! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:29, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

<insert name here>

Score: 2

• Totally Against - Someone hacked my account, I want to get that f***er killed User:Suilven 17:34, 23 February 2007
• N&F - You know what you did. . .  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 23:30, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• For. This particular user should meet the lynch mob. I hate this user with a passion. 12:41, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against I deeply love this person with the passionate flame of a thousand beating hearts. To ban them would be a travesty. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 15:22, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

• Against once more, just to prove my point. I mean, really, a sexy beast with a flare for soulful love. He's got the hots, and I crave for his tender romance. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 22:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - Uh, Squiggy? That's kinda creepy. . . :)  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 13:29, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

• Nonsense! I will share my love with the world! /me passionately makes out with self. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 23:29, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

• You Bastards --Anyone 17:32, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I haven't done anything offensive. Now you're making everyone look bad.--Jtaylor1 11:54, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• Comment. This is cute, but I should point out the Username template only works once per page. (The TOC, for instance, merely lists it as "anonymous user."--Procopius 22:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

• Comment - Yeah, but it is what it is, what can ya do? It's been hilarious watching them get caught!  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 23:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

• Strong For. I hate you and everything you stand for. —Hinoa KUN (talk) 04:13, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against. I like myself. Swordmaster 03:41, 19 November 2006 (UTC) Oh, what tomfoolery we engage in here. Swordmaster 03:48, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
• Against- Hey, hey, hey! I'm dormant for a few months and I'm under such attack!!! Who is the captain of this bastard squad??-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 20:10, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
• STRONG FOR. This guy needs to die already. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:46, 28 November 2006 (UTC)
• What a fucker. - David Gerard 08:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
• For - This moron is such a coward.--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 23:51, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strong For - This guy is such a prick! - Nonymous 16:44, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
• Pat Buchanan - I'm confused... --AAA! (AAAA) 07:06, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strongly for I love me and my wikiempire. --Walter Humala - Emperor of West Wikipedia |wanna Talk? 02:39, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
• Strongly For +∞ This user is a total and complete dumbass with no sense of humor, his articles are shite and he proves himself to be a babbling illiterate misanthrope with no remorse for any of the horrific crap he has polluted this site with. Not only should this user be banned he should be tracked down and fed to the Ravenous Bug Bladder Beast of Trall!--Proximale 09:16, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
• Strongly For. I want his fucking head chopped off and brought to me, so I can put it on my mantle. --GAMESPOT=666 01:36, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
• For a good time, press 1. --thematrixeætsyou, the ultimate (talk) (flames) 21:52, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
• This Spammer Is Making Me Angry Strong Against This Is SPAM--Jamesryanjcrjcr 08:46, 3 February 2007 (UTC)
• Against don't you know that the internets is a series of <insert name here>s?  –              Smiddle              08:49, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

• Against Nah, I kinda like him/her/it/a whiny lil' biatch! --Trar 23:30, 4 February 2007 (UTC)\

• For Yeah I hate <insert name here>... He/She gets my vote. I also vote For that ALL his pages get an immediate NRV'ing. --10rd Ben 00:49, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

• AGAINST I AGREE WITH SQUIGGLE. HE IS JUST SO CUTE!--» >ZEROTROUSERS!!! EAT ME!!!! CRAZY PERSON! SMELLY!!! ILLOGIC, BEHOLD!!!!~» 02:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

• Strong Against - Without doubt the greatest Uncyclopedian ever. Take a bow, <insert name here>. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:36, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

SU182

Score: +4

• Nom and For Contributes nothing constructive to Uncyclopedia and acts like a complete asshole to everyone. He deserves an infinite ban! He must never be allowed to come back! --General Insineratehymn 03:38, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
• What a dick --Hotadmin4u69 ^[TALK] 22:37, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
• Ban - although we can assume that, because this person is so horrid on Uncyclopedia, in real life they must be a charitable do-gooders who does everything he can to serve the community. Or maybe not. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
• Ban - And I just started this nomination because {{USERNAME}} was disabled. --AAA! (AAAA) 08:09, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Hinoa

Score: 0

• Nom and For Being an asshat by banning almost everyone for almost anything. --BAN ME FOREVER, OR ELSE!!!111one 03:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
• Give him the Bucket of Piss Award Banning me for something. --Lstarnes 03:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strongly For Hinoa is a fat, ugly, smelly bitch that sucks old mens' cocks for loose change! --BAN ME, OR ELSE!!! 03:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

No, you're thinking of this guy. —Major Sir Hinoa prepare for trouble • make it double? 03:50, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

• Aganist --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 13:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Against Hinoa is a phsically fit, handsome, respectable young man who gives %100 effort in his community and occasionally helps a senior cross the road! -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 07:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• against. hinoa has banned me before now, but for good reasons. in my mind he's like the puppet from the interpol video but more... rodenty - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Kjhf

Score: -1

• Nom+F To see who actually uses this page. -Kjhf!- (feeling chatty?) 12:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• For this page getting used. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me) 12:38, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Aganist --”' PrincessCaitlai ”' (”'T”') 13:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• Against cos I never use this page. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
• against/for - (delete as appropriate) - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:01, 25 February 2007 (UTC)