From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Something stupid I made when I was a noob. --Nordamus (blab • crap) 22:35, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Ok, if you say so. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 23:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Silly noobs, always making stuff. I made stuff once, but mom made me flush. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:55, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Should have been QVFD'd per Nordamus being the original author, but whatever. --Dexter111344 02:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:47, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per author. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:21, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah, deserves to go. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 07:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Stumble across it following a user dispute. It's bad. I say burn to the ground and start over. ~ 07:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Pro-huff -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:22, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- peculiar Ape (lick) (Riot Porn) 18:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Seriously guys, Kitten Huffing has been taken waaay too far. So I say huff this crap (heh heh... joke). --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 21:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Even though Chuck Norris is mentioned The Oblong Lobster 22:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kerkill --Dexter111344 02:06, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. A hairball of an article. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 07:44, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Annihilate - Please. --Nordamus (blab • crap) 22:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Another one that has been on rewrite for months. Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Naff stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 07:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - Bye bye!! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Rearranging letters is not enough to hold interest in the first section; the second has the germ of an idea but it is not developed much. ----OEJ 00:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kerkill --Dexter111344 03:20, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Forget what I said on the talk page; that never panned out due to
my laziness other obligations. Pentium5dot1 04:31, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - It disgusts me to see that the incredibly talented guitarist who wrote the masterpiece "Mood For A Day" has such a crap article. This has been on rewrite for four months now. However, this article has no good ideas, which should mean deletion, not rewrite tagging. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Crap list. And a bit of wibble before it. Agree with Cs. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 07:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:24, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- DRUG MAN -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Send it to Sheol! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Badly formated and uninteresting. The list is utterly moronic. ----OEJ 00:22, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kerkill Also, I have no idea who this is so I can't help improve it any. --Dexter111344 02:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep - Yes, it's very short, but it has some ideas, and I'm not particularly in favour of the "keyboard redlinking" we've been doing recently. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- If it has some ideas, why don't you expand on those ideas? --General Insineratehymn 22:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. "...no sound pronounced in a very specific way.". Classic. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 08:34, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as per Cs. What's with all the keyboard hate, anyway? -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I love the keyboard pages. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Also, why are there two keyboards? --Dexter111344 23:13, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:11, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --WTF? --Nordamus (blab • crap) 22:42, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Mysteriously bolded Delete vote -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:13, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 23:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 06:21, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Junk. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 07:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:08, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No real sense of coherence or biographical storyline. Kind of random. ----OEJ 00:18, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kerkill Utter trash. --Dexter111344 03:19, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Save the whore Ok, I am not sure what is wrong with you people, May is the most optimistic people that we know of. Besides, the FCC censorship had screwed fucked Pokemon and the show would be more humorous and better if there were references of homosexuality and at least have some people and pokemon killed (and music from Rise Against).--Dark Paladin X 00:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete Pretty much the same situation as the Hikari article. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
Delete. As satire, this article is pointless; as humor it is flat. The repeated images at the bottom are idiotic. ----OEJ 22:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. My favorite part is when there are 20 more pictures than there are words for several dozen lines. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 22:15, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted --General Insineratehymn 23:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I started this article. But it gets vandalized at least once a day. Kill it, and I might rewrite it. Someday. Actually a lot of Pokemon articles (Hikari, Harley) can go. Fresh Stain Serq Fet of Pokemon (At your service) 05:30, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Dark Paladin's statement above sums it up neatly, I think. Wait, that's a for? Hnng. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 07:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:04, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- BURN IT ALL!! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete The fact that anyone thinks a computer game needs more than one article is depressing. The Oblong Lobster 22:16, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete 'cuz I hate Pokemon. HATE HATE HAT! --Dexter111344 23:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- One author wrote, "She hit puberty and her new voice sounds SEXY! RRRRRRRRRRRRROWR!" Wait a sec, there, lad. Go to the fridge, get some ice cubes, and put them on your crotch. You're talking about a cartoon for children. Articles like this one fill me with futile anger: why are potentially good writers spending time elaborating highly commercialized mass-media trivia? Egads, this soap box is tippy. I think -- WHOOPS! */Jack falls face-first into a pile of horse d'oeuvre/*----OEJ 22:14, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- I change my vote to abstain. Pokemon is a cultural phenomenon, even if it is an artificially-produced and completely commercialized "phenomenon" targeting a 7-to-12-year-old market sector. As such it is fair game for satire, though the article in question doesn't show a level of satire which would convince me to vote keep. ----OEJ 00:14, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. o____o -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as vanity. Probably belongs on his userpage. ----OEJ 22:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 23:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:07, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Oh dear. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 07:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:03, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - This article fails. YOU LOSE!! GOOD DAY SIR!! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:11, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:40, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, nasty, and a confused mixture of pornstar and pokemon. To Chaucer Cytherea was a "blysful lady swete", but this article is neither blissful nor sweet...nor is it is not funny or intelligent. ----OEJ 21:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Nothing redeeming to be found. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 07:10, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:02, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Too disgusting to Huff, BURN!! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:12, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kerkill per the very accurate quote on the page: “This isn't funny!! I quit!!!” ~ MSN Messenger Wink on Cytherea. --Dexter111344 02:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. - This has the potential for some funny shit here. It isn't the best but a little work can make this into something worth readingUser:SLAvemAsteRsQUaReD 12:32, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:32, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- FBI Raid -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Uninteresting, mostly. Another kid-vid article, with the usual sex-n'-violence crapola that kid writers seem to think is really funny. I dunno, man. See a shrink. ----OEJ 21:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - He's got pedophilia!!! The Oblong Lobster 22:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Poor. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 07:06, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 11:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - It needs to die. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Parakeep Change into Unscripts. --Nordamus (blab • crap) 22:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- This is about the 90th time I've read it, and I still laughed out loud. --Dexter111344 20:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Heh... I liked it. The quote was great too. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Parakeep - Once again, I do not agree with Yellow. Wow. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:26, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Ah, it's not so bad. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:59, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Mudkeeps --Asema 10:48, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. I love the concept. I'm not terribly familiar with maintenance tags, but is there a form of Rewrite that's appropriate for an article with a good concept but poor execution? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 18:55 Sep 09, 2007
- Weak keep --Dexter111344 20:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I love the elephant blasting. The Oblong Lobster 20:58, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. I like the idea, it made me smirk. Needs serious improvement though. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - What? It's my favorite pass time, next to kittens. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:18, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep. It should be expanded, it is a stub, but it is a proper bit of satire. ----OEJ 17:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - The only thing I knew about the US constitution is something to do with being allowed to shoot each other. But now I know a little bit more. The Oblong Lobster 20:08, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. If right-wing radio is correct (and when are they not?), people keep hiding behind this. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Because I said so. --Omb 11:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Semi-funny. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 21:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:01, 13 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete Not funny. --Nordamus (blab • crap) 22:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Old stub that was never expanded. Please expand it to save it from deletion. --General Insineratehymn 15:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff Somebody can hack up a new version later, but this one sucks. EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 22:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kerkill Yay! I made up a new word! Oh, and, I also think it needs a total revamp. None of this is worth keeping. It just isn't funny. --Dexter111344 19:51, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. It's been tagged WiP for a couple of weeks with no improvement, and it's basically listy random sexcruft. I don't see this getting any better. Case for the defence, anyone? --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 12:59, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Random and unfunny. I can't see this getting any better. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:05, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Who's Hannah Montana again? Ж Kalir with all the grace of a tin can 14:55, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Oh, and, Hannah Montana is a newer one of the Disney-bitches, kind of like Britney Spears or Lindsay Lohan were. --Dexter111344 20:15, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Moist Ass -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:45, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. At least the Trivia section wasn't overly listy. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 20:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Bad writing, random capitalization, no pictures (what's the matter, you have an allergy to Google?), and general cliché sex-violence. ----OEJ 21:49, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Not funny. Funny for the racist-minded, but otherwise no. --Omb 11:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Bad article, and part of a revert-war. Racist claptrap, and nasty as well. (Cina is Malay for "Chinese".) ----OEJ 14:03, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Racist and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 14:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Full of obscene stuffs. User:Anonymous 23.20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fucking kill it -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Seems like unfunny vanity to me, unless I missed something. Woah, deja vu. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Seems like unfunny vanity to me, unless I missed something. Woah, deja vu. Well, not exactly (I just wanted to make the deja vu more convincing). It's just a made up subject based on TAS. This article is listy and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:38, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Horrible: repetitive lists, anguished Japanglish, no coherency or images. The "article" was created in only two edits, and the complete lack of effort shows. ----OEJ 13:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 21:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Seems like unfunny vanity to me, unless I missed something. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - As mentioned later in the article, TAS stands for Tool Assisted Speedrun, which is a coincidence since I have just recently been watching parts of Ocarina of Time TAS's on YouTube (yes, I am an extreme nerd/geek, laugh at me). However, this article is rather unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. "TAS is known as a person clearing a game fastest widely" is a great sentence, if you happen to be a dyslexic gradeschool dropout whose first language is Martian. ----OEJ 13:50, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:51, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- I think that the page has been run through one of them internets language translators a few times. In any event, <head explodes>. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:52, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 21:15, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - Random, unfunny fiction (Well, I think its fiction anyway). Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:04, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 05:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. The second it mentions Chaos-Shadow, you know you're in trouble. It doesn't improve. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:19, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No. No more bad game-based fantasy crap. ----OEJ 13:48, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 20:41, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kerkill --Dexter111344 20:46, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 20:54, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete,
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:48, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I thought Maths and Science articles were supposed to be funny. :( Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:02, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 04:12, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Red links, hard to read, dull and unfunny. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Nom and Delete It could be so much better -- (Bonner) (Talk) 19:14, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Amen to that -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Maybe this is a job for a Conservation Week volunteer... Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 04:00, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 04:10, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Is not filled me with laughing. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Bye, dull stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:56, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Deleet. Sadly unfunny for those of you familiar with the topic, just unfunny for those who don't. Either way, drown it and lock it away. Ж Kalir with all the grace of a tin can 00:33, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Euphemism for "Delete" referencing to Cave Story -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 00:44, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Random and unfunny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 04:09, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random, dull, hnng. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:25, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- It's not funny...just a flamefest towards some site that may or may not be biased towards the topic in question. Come on. Barcode711 11:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- This is bad, sad and glad without being glad, but sad, and most definitely bad. The Oblong Lobster 11:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Not funny. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:42, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Oh dear. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 15:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Hatecruft: somebody doesn't like the game Fallout. Nobody cares what he does or doesn't like, because the article is not funny and is horribly written. ----OEJ 17:17, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Gross faggotry -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Tagged as vanity, but whatever the hell it is I didn't find any funny. There's pretty much nothing to it and it's dull, --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:34, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:08, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Crap in most respects. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 13:33, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears to be cruft relating to a Sony Playstation game, and what little (badly-written) content the article has probably makes sense only to a few gamers familiar with the avatar described. ----OEJ 17:12, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kerkill I have no idea what this is talking about. And, correct me if I'm wrong on this, but quotes aren't suppose to take up so much space, especially if they're not funny. Oh, and, there is a thing called funny repetition and stupidity. --Dexter111344 20:02, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Over and over and over and Chuck Norris -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:11, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:23, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Just lacks any kind of love or care. Bleeds The Oblong Lobster 21:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kill it, kill it with fire! EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 22:30, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:38, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff IN A FIRE!!! --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:28, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:09, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Consider a redirect to Genetic engineering. I see nothing worth merging, but I'm not sure whether this counts as a delete vote. Pentium5dot1 01:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- KILL Crap sounds too real this is Uncyclopedia not encyclopedia britananica. --The Great Yellow Crayon Get PWNED Yellow 130 is teh pwnz 19:57, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - I hate to say this, but Yellow is right. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:30, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfunny stub. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Almost good enough to keep...but underdeveloped and never quite makes sufficient sense.----OEJ 17:37, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:15, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Kerkill I thought it was going to being funny. But, as OEJ said, it's too underdeveloped and doesn't make sense all the way through. Sorry. --Dexter111344 19:57, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 22:25, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete as per below -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:55, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Just say no to Norris. And it's undeveloped, and picless, and senseless. ----OEJ 16:05, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Chuck Norris is the worst. -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 17:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- The desperate tug on the cock of Norris rings the bell of Delete.
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:32, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No match for the vicious chicken of Bristol either. Must watch Holy Grail again soon. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:55, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:06, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- CRAP William Hung sucking a cock hahaha so funny. --The Great Yellow Crayon Get PWNED Yellow 130 is teh pwnz 20:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- O________________________________________________O -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 21:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- HOLY SHIT DELETE IMMEDIATELY -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- As per Roman dog EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank) 22:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:40, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Lovely and racist. The Oblong Lobster 22:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Huff - I think that this would be quickly deleteable. Redirect to White People. --Capercorn FLAME! what? UNATO OWS 03:27, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No redeeming features. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:07, 10 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - Random, unfunny and short. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 15:50, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Ditto Cs1987. And no pics. ----OEJ 15:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:56, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 17:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Stubby piffle. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 18:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Okay, fine, I acknowledge that this article is crap. I should have known better than to make those two minor contributions... um... Anyway, I am in favor of deletion, but consider a redirect to MC Hammer or something similar. Pentium5dot1 18:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, but redirect to MC Hammer. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 18:56 Sep 09, 2007
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. I've QVFD'd this page several times with no results, so I figure I might as well turn it in here. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Delete.. Stupid Stupid, with with annoying annoying repetition repetition.. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 18:51 Sep 09, 2007 – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 18:51 Sep 09, 2007
- Delete For some odd reason, when I read it the first time, I didn't notice the repetition and was reading it without the repeating of each word... Weird... --Dexter111344 18:59, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep - I like it. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 05:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep This is actually really well written. A bit messy, but really quite amusing. The Oblong Lobster 11:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 11:24, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Again, I've tidied up the spelling and red links, and what's left, apart from formatting (not my strength) is far from bad. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 11:31, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 02:51, September 8, 2007
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Craft-cruft: worthless articles in which two or more popular figures, usually from video games or Catholicism, are crafted together. I have just coined the term Craft-cruft -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 20:04, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, than CVP - I made a big mistake when I thought Barney the Dinosaur should redirect there. The Puppet Master will probably create more and more socks and will continue to vandalise it, and it is not that good of an article either.--Sir Manforman 20:08, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a pity when someone puts a lot of work into something and the end product is crap. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 21:33, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --General Insineratehymn 22:59, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN • Capt.) 02:51, September 8, 2007
- Delete. When I saw the title, I suspected I didn't need to read the article to vote. I did then read it, but I wish I hadn't. Rubbish. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 08:20, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Mitch 12:07, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Just...why? The Oblong Lobster 14:11, 8 September 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|