From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Votes for deletion.
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. As I voted in 2011. Newman, "No one will ever search for it" is not a magic mantra that one can utter as proof that a page should be deleted. It is a phrase I use to refer to a page title that is only notable after the reader has finished reading the page in question, comparable to, "You have to type the punch line to read the joke." It does not apply to this page, as Wikipedia tells us "bearded dragon" (Pogona barbata) is an Australian lizard. Now, last time, we were promised some work on this, and it still could use some; author seems to treat the bearded dragon as a concept he invented that is funny because he invented it. Spıke Ѧ 15:48 1-Sep-13
- Keep. But only just. There are Bearded Dragons. There should be an article. But this one starts rather better than it ends. Someone could probably salvage this. Just not me.--Sog1970 (talk) 20:25, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
- I gave it a bit more, relating it to Samson and the bearded clam. Spıke Ѧ 17:07 2-Sep-13
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. This article is so unfunny and poor that no one will ever search for it. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 15:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. It is odd, but certainly not against any rule, to have a second article on Alex Rodriguez--even though it is not really about A-Rod (except for repeating the A-Roid joke) but about the jock-sniffing broadcaster on YES Sports. It needs a re-titling or more work (for example, more commentary by the broadcaster suggesting that A-Rod's underperformance during that one broadcast should not have been a surprise but in fact is a chronic problem), but not deletion. Spıke Ѧ 23:10 29-Aug-13
- Keep. Based upon what Spike says however needs re-titling as I gather by this discussion that the title refers to a name however I do not understand this reference so is not comprehensive to all. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:36, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- A-Rod is such a common nickname that it does not need clarification; the only problem is that one doesn't look up baseball stars in an encyclopedia by their nickname. Some New York Yankees fan needs to retitle this page so it precisely refers to the person it refers to. Spıke Ѧ 17:37 30-Aug-13
- I have never heard of the nickname "A-rod" in my life. It is certainly not common use where I live. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:15, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Few of your townspeople would have heard of him by the name Alex Rodriguez either. That's not a disqualifier, as the audience for this page will be American. We have plenty of pages on MLB and on teams of the Premier League. (The largely factual UnNews:A-Rod plunking spurs debate over baseball protocol will tell you what the big deal is.) Spıke Ѧ 21:46 30-Aug-13
- I agree not a disqualifier if widely known in the country which he lives in. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Someone's own article about Alex Rodriguez making success in baseball from a long time ago. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 21:50, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. I took and added the photo, and I'm pretty sure the article's lead editor kotra wasn't the subject of it. GreenReaper (talk) 16:39, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
- I apologize for the incorrect assumption in my nomination. Apart from that, though, it is still true that vanity overwhelms humor in this article. Spıke Ѧ 19:41 24-Aug-13
- Pacman. The article may need some improvement, but it's otherwise okay. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:39, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
- We need a page on this vital topic. Aleister 9-9-9
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. A fantasy bio complete with author's photo. Remove the vanity and there is no point left. Spıke Ѧ 12:48 24-Aug-13
- Delete. Awful subtitle names. Made-up place I think. Not actually very funny. Intro had no jokes and the only joke I could find in the next paragraph is that some secret government organisations kill animals for fun in the name of science, which has unoriginality stamped all over it. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:48, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. What did you find there? Anton (talk) 15:37, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Not really worth keeping, is it? Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 15:17, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The current article begins with overt cyberbullying. As well as neighbors, politicians and media celebrities an editor dislikes appear on this cum-dumpster of a page solely for the drive-by slap of casting them as porn stars, along with Oscar Wilde, Mr. T, Bobby Fischer, and Your Mom. Such information as might actually relate to real pornographers seems to be contributed either by fanboys or by people whose mailed request for a signed photo was never replied to. No one wants this page badly enough to edit #50, "The dipshit that made theirs number one instead of 49th because they think theirs is so damn special." Spıke Ѧ 15:49 5-Sep-13
- Delete. Anton (talk) 18:27, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. NOW! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:32, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Would happen faster if you'd increment the vote count. Spıke Ѧ 11:26 6-Sep-13
- EXTERMINATE! I was surprised that number 50 on the list had the person's username when they view it. Anyways, it's also my least favorite Worst 100 list. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 15:38, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
- I strongly disapprove of the "comedy" strategy of "surprising" (I call it pranking) the reader with {{USERNAME}}, though it may be comedy for the writer. Spıke Ѧ 16:15 8-Sep-13
- You do? And how about Minitrue? Anton (talk) 17:58, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. I cleaned it up enough to survive. Someone else please find suitable photos. Spıke Ѧ 11:50 7-Sep-13
- Can we, please, resurrect the first photo of the article, as the reason for its deletion was that it was unused? Anton (talk) 20:09, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
- It is File:Nwa4px.gif. Anton (talk) 20:10, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Now restored, but only used once in the article. Spıke Ѧ 03:30 8-Sep-13
- Keep. Nice White artists - straight outta Hampshire --Sog1970 (talk) 22:06, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (0) |
Article with attitude It is a failed attempt of being humourously racist. Was nominated for deletion in 2006, kept but not rewritten. Thousands of red links and broken file links. Anton (talk) 11:08, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
- Niggaz Wit Attitudes was a real rap band. I have also found a better revision of the page that dates back to 2007 (the article did get rewritten, but the rewrite made it worse). Anton (talk) 11:13, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Vote closed--nomination withdrawn. Spıke Ѧ 03:30 8-Sep-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. An Anon playground from 2010 despite an assist from MadMax. No one will search for this: If you get the notion of a thong made of mohair and come to Uncyclopedia to see if there is an article on it, you have already given yourself more laughs than this article will give you. Relating it to Poland is never explained and constitutes using the dumb Polack as a meme. Spıke Ѧ 15:34 3-Sep-13
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:40, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I liked the title, wish I owned one too so I could donate it for the church bingo... but...it's pants..Thongs of Praise... --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:34, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Anton (talk) 18:26, September 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 05:44, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -4
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. Certainly saveable and not that bad. I'll see what I can do. What is the nominator's reason for nomination? Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:09, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Bad Anton (talk) 10:24, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
- It's not that valid a reason. It isn't that bad certainly not bad enough to be nominated. What specifically is bad about it? Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:37, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Quality. But, okay, if you want I can help you with it. Anton (talk) 12:02, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. I claim the Save on this one, though it still neglects college football and NASCAR. Spıke Ѧ 13:34 5-Sep-13
- Don't hurt the Swanana! This is a pretty good article actually, but there is a little content that needs to be rewritten or removed sometime as this is the case. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 12:34, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
- My new text "needs to be rewritten or removed"? Please specify on my talk page. Spıke Ѧ 14:42 7-Sep-13
- Why should I always take my words back? Anton (talk) 20:12, September 7, 2013 (UTC)
- 'Coz dey wrong Spıke Ѧ 03:32 8-Sep-13
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. I couldn't find a better revision. Anton (talk) 09:53, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- There is so much to ridicule about Dixie, and it can be done without complete contempt. But the Intro hits me over the head with lynching, slavery (best treated delicately with a happy-face approach in a History section), and bestiality. It attracted Anon overnight, for which reason it appropriately landed on VFD. The best way to keep Anon at bay is to make a quality article where Anon's cheap shots won't fit; good luck. Spıke Ѧ 12:57 3-Sep-13
- Thanks, any help would be appreciated though! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:06, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
- Just to notify everyone, Spike and I are saving this from VFD. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:31, September 3, 2013 (UTC)
|
- If you would instead like to discuss the historical treatment of the Jews, now see: User talk:ScottPat#Wallet on VFD. Spıke Ѧ 15:04 2-Sep-13
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Originally created by MagicBus and was full of toilet humour. Anon tried to rewrite it according to Wikipedia article but did not achieve this. Anton (talk) 11:23, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Short, terrible. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:42, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Thanks to nominator for the research. Indeed, there has never been much at this title; Romartus, trying to repair vandalism last January, notes that the result was "less crappy...not by much." Someone start over. Spıke Ѧ 15:08 2-Sep-13
- Delete. As above --Sog1970 (talk) 16:16, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. 'Less crappy' isn't much of a recommendation even from me. Down the poop shoot. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 13:27, September 4, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Dogshit sandwich (formerly Nigger Dogshit Sandwiches)
Score: -1
|
Keep (5) |
- Keep. I don't find this anymore offensive than many of our articles. I'd be happy to change it to “Dogshit sandwiches” as the racial aspect adds no inherent value beyond the in-joke, and remove the Fisher Price reference, but it's quality enough that I wouldn't throw the baby out with the bath water. • Puppy's talk page • 12:30 29 Aug 2013
- That would flip me to Keep. Spıke Ѧ 23:17 29-Aug-13
- I am not talking about offense, it is just not funny. And how can you judge whether it is offensive or not? Anton (talk) 17:31, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Comparing one's skin color to dogshit, I think that qualifies, especially with our site hosted where many people take such notions as fighting words. As below: There is no humor justification. Spıke Ѧ 21:49 1-Sep-13
- Keep. What PuppyOnTheRadio said, except for the part about removing the Fisher Price reference. That's the best part.--Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 14:54, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Jeez, we'll need to start wearing those muslim napkins over our faces if we keep being offended by things on this site. Aleister 30-8-'13
- Keep. (Formerly Delete.) Edited and retitled as Puppy et al. propose. The racism is softened and confined to Section 2. Also added a link to Haggis. Spıke Ѧ 03:55 2-Sep-13
- Keep. (Formerly Delete.) Title changed to remove racism with no apparent comedial backing. Funny article on hot dog thanks to Puppy's changes. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:35, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. A terrible injoke from 2009. Anton (talk) 11:55, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Kind of short and not funny. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:03, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
Delete. Inherently offensive with no humor justification. Spıke Ѧ 13:24 28-Aug-13
- Delete. Survived an earlier FFW on a technicality. Was unfunny then, remains so now. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:27, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
Delete. Cheap excuse for racism. Funny article about a hot dog would be better please. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:43, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. On the grounds that if anyone called my children niggers I'd be offended (Can't we just change the title?)--Sog1970 (talk) 22:19, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
- We can't debate this side issue 'cos we don't know who the mothers are. Spıke Ѧ 03:55 2-Sep-13
|
Comments |
- I don't hate the article, but I do hate the title too much to save--Sog1970 (talk) 21:16, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Or to vote, evidently? Spıke Ѧ 21:49 1-Sep-13
- Will the title be typed in or do people actually refer to hot dogs as "Dogshit sandwiches?" Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:34, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
- Good question; they largely don't. But there is a redirect from the old name; and they might get there from Hot dog; see new nomination above. Spıke Ѧ 14:56 2-Sep-13
- Vote closed. Although diverse, the call for a rework, and the vote based on the rework, seems to be sufficient to block a consensus to delete. Spıke Ѧ 01:56 4-Sep-13
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. Repaired (see below) by an obvious expert in the field. Spıke Ѧ 19:11 1-Sep-13
- Strong keep. Yep, it's fixed now. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 21:21, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- In the style of my fork votes, time for non-sequiters! so, whats the deal with airline food? --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 04:55, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
Break and enter Bad quality. Nothing else I can say. Anton (talk) 21:06, August 20, 2013 (UTC) (rewrote the article myself)
|
Comments |
- Sort of average for
HowTo: . Needs pix; doesn't need swearing and Rape Humor. Is nominator inclined to turn it into something funny? Spıke Ѧ 21:14 20-Aug-13
- Nominator is not inclined to do anything right now. Anton (talk) 10:18, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed, needs more work but not atrocious enough to delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:51, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- I rewrote it! Anton (talk) 19:00, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Vote closed; Sv-Anton199. Spıke Ѧ 14:59 2-Sep-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Maybe some deleters are unaware of the huge in-joke this relates too, Fisher Price, and it seems like a very clever addition to the genre. If it's deleted can it be added as a section to one of the existing articles related to Fisher Price? Thanks. Aleister 18:21 27-8-'13
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. It might be funny, but my lack of Hebrew sort of ruins the joke. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 14:26, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. A creation by Kip the Dip that transcends niche appeal; it is foreign-language appeal. After looking at WP:List of English words of Yiddish origin, this could be a whimsical notion, but it is not an encyclopedia article. Spıke Ѧ 14:45 16-Aug-13
- Delete. Not good at all. Just a line or two of Hebrew and a dreidel. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 15:23, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Say, why aren't we getting all the fork spambots? --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 19:37, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Seems a bit of an orphaned idea. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:19, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Sorry but if it's an in-joke then it is a dead one now. Nice to know it when it lived. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:43, September 2, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Such construction barrels are so rare, that an average reader has probably never heard of them. Anton (talk) 10:25, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. A contrived article that no one will search for. No real work since Anon's first version in 2007. Spıke Ѧ 09:46 22-Aug-13
- Delete. This article is short, low-quality and not funny. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 00:14, August 29, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I've never seen a "construction barrel" in my life (we have cones where I come from), never mind a man-eating one! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:50, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. There are several articles now in exactly the same style, sharing most the content, on these sorts of cones. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 15:00, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- While it's true no one will search for it - there are worse articles on this wiki. Perhaps if the author returned, added a couple pix and some more content? --Sog1970 (talk) 00:00, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
- Even with more content, the article would still be bad without some good ideas. Anton (talk) 11:57, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
- If you want to try to save this article, go ahead. But the two-wrongs-make-a-right argument doesn't sway me. If there are worse articles on this wiki, let's find them too. Spıke Ѧ 13:28 28-Aug-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Provocative fiction, deep allegory, mostly unfunny. Spıke Ѧ 00:27 28-Aug-13
- Burninate! Exactly what SPIKE said. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:34, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Of its era and dated. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:22, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Awful. Although brilliant title concept. Could mock religion nicely if it had some funny content. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:45, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. When I was reading the introduction, I thought the article was worth saving but then it became worse and worse. Anton (talk) 12:53, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Neither encyclopedic nor funny. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:04, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The initial quotations are generic; the Intro is history-of-the-future; the body is stock stereotypes, both of blacks and of Bush as anti-black. The article's nearest thing to a joke is Samuel Jackson and "motherfuckers," but this is both beat into the ground and used as a meme, relating as little to Snakes on a Plane as this article relates to anything. Spıke Ѧ 17:42 30-Aug-13
- Delete. This article is unfunny, poor and blatant. Remained this way for several years now. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 00:58, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.. Anton (talk) 12:46, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I liked the first line, just not any of the subsequent ones. --Sog1970 (talk) 20:27, September 1, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (3) |
- Cowbells. Somebody could really improve this, and add more humor and the remove that "This article needs more cowbell." stuff. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 20:33, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Saved by Newman66. Spıke Ѧ 23:06 30-Aug-13
- Keep. Based on above comment. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 08:01, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (0) |
|
Comments |
- My word! it seems Newman66 has volunteered again! I have protected this page against Anon, as this article does not need more cowbell, and indeed the repetition of the template and the illustration are exactly the classic fault of telling a single joke to death. "Needing more cowbell" is a powerful in-joke, but it belongs to
a stand-up comic, I do not know which one Will Farrell, not to an Uncyclopedian. ScottPat, would you do your duty as nominator and find a cleaner version in the history? I recommend you start with the oldest rather than the newest; there was once a funny page inside this. Spıke Ѧ 21:41 30-Aug-13
- Yes sir! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:44, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- It is a struggle to find a suitable history version. The second edit done in 2005 looks very much like the current one with lots of templates and minimal writing. Later on the templates are removed and replaced with terrible writing and no images. Then some users decide to restore the page and ends up with all templates like today. I think better to re-write whole thing (I'm not volunteering, no time) or delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:53, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Indeed; thanks for doing the research. Revert to the best one you found and let's vote on whether it's better than nothing. Spıke Ѧ 21:55 30-Aug-13
- I found a revision here which I can make the revision like a mix between that revision and this current revision (where the templates and terrible writing are almost completely removed). I'll have to let you guys be patient and I'll restore it to make it
better> the best revision than ever! Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:02, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. Old and bad quality. The only good thing is images. Anton (talk) 12:00, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Don't know what's happening to me. I now see that it's a parody of car ads. Anton (talk) 12:20, August 31, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Of profoundly low quality. Created in 2010 by Beansofjelly; tagged by RabbiTechno saying, "have a good feeling about this noob, let's give 'em a chance." Didn't work. Spıke Ѧ 18:28 30-Aug-13
- Delete. Good writing but hardly encyclopedic. Anton (talk) 18:36, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- That was easy. Poor article. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 21:33, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Kill. DIE! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:34, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Too listy and too redolent of stuff you'd scrape off your shoe. --Sog1970 (talk) 22:11, August 30, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. We do not need an article about that. Anton (talk) 10:53, August 17, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Bickering quotations. Nonsense date. Author giving himself props in the Intro ("I'm gonna make a hell of a lot gags based on that fact"). It was like *BAAOHM*, *BOOM*, RAAAOR!, WROAM, WRHOOOM!. Finale: We don't know the real facts, no one cares, author confesses he is getting lazy. This article was a dud. Spıke Ѧ 19:41 18-Aug-13
- DELETE-DELETE Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:50, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
- I guess. The author and other contributors to this article should have done better, and someone would have to improve this article if this is the case. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 17:38, August 25, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. It was like *BAAOHM*, *BOOM*, RAAAOR!, WROAM, WRHOOOM! and the article went up in smoke. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:03, August 28, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A very simple understanding of the Y2K bug and does not interest the reader as it seems to be its only joke. Anton (talk) 14:16, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Such an article has a high threshold, as the Y2K bug is over 13 years old. This one is more ramble, with notable wobbles into the business of trying to seriously explain digital encoding to the reader. Spıke Ѧ 22:14 11-Aug-13
- Delete. We ought to have a good article on this. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 18:21, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. We need a better article. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 20:16, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Not that funny. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 17:29, August 25, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- A serious digression of my own: Despite notorious anecdotes, there were few Y2K bugs and no cases of customers losing money because the computer wouldn't do business. But famously, all the software in America had to be sifted through to prove this--including some of it that worked fine, although the tools to rebuild it had been lost. This real story could be turned into a funny article. Spıke Ѧ 22:14 11-Aug-13
- I recall buying a "Y2K bug" some years ago. It resembled a stuffed ladybug. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 18:26, August 15, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. Nominator adds to his recent confusion in the Forum between VFD and QVFD, the difference between this court and VFH. Here we are not voting on whether to run an article on the main page, but whether to delete it outright. Nothing makes this article deletable! least of all its choice of subject. Tyrone McGee and I have been debating edits to this article today. I value nominator's eye for the lousy Uncyclopedia article, but I don't trust his discretion not to attack the non-lousy article, and his recent nominations have focused on savaging the contributions of users who are slightly newer even than he is, ignoring the aspect of how they perceive our welcome of them. Spıke Ѧ 23:03 19-Aug-13
- Keep. SPIKE speaks truth to power, man. And if I wasn't all jittery with insects crawling under my skin I'd help edit the page, man. Aleister 18:48 20-8-'13
- pass me the METH Oh man... that's some GOOOD shit. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 04:57, August 21, 2013 (UTC)(My real opinion on drugs? FUCK THEM, HARD)
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. We don't need any article much like this. It isn't as funny and well-done as some of those articles that need to be featured. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 22:33, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Stupid article that no one will search for that isn't funny either. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 21:21, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unencyclopedic babble even before the author breaks completely with the format and gives his email address inline for feedback. Being funny means more than laughling as you press hard enough on a key that autorepeat takes over. Spıke Ѧ 21:48 22-Aug-13
- Delete. Pointless--Sog1970 (talk) 23:58, August 23, 2013 (UTC)
Delete. The beginning is quite similar to AAAAAAAAA! and is more than likely just an attempt to copy it, delete. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Tyrone McGee (talk • contribs)
- Delete. I want this to be a good article, because I like WP:Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo. Sadly it isn't as funny as what it's parodying. Redirect to Penis penis Penis penis penis penis Penis penis, given that's a better parody of the subject. • Puppy's talk page • 12:54 24 Aug 2013
- Delete. What Puppy said. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 04:00, August 24, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- While I voted to delete, the total vote tally is less than 5. The unsigned vote doesn't count (and should have been removed). The deletion of this article is premature. • Puppy's talk page • 01:11 24 Aug 2013
- I've posted to his talk page but I concede your point. Spıke Ѧ 01:16 24-Aug-13
- Redirected. Spıke Ѧ 11:50 24-Aug-13
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. This may be a stupid page, but it has lots of fans (see discussion page). I'm not a fan of it, but it is too prominent a page to delete imnho. It's been nominated for VFH a few times, in 2007 and after, and if it was nommed in 2012 to weaken the site this is the first I've heard of that. Edit is locked on it, which is why it probably has no VFD tag. See my own personal contribution to yucky doody lore. Aleister 17:37 20-8-'13
- And why should we care about history? We are being too conservative, as we should keep only the things that are good, not the things that are famous. Anton (talk) 20:58, August 20, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep.I like traps. They confuse the viewer. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 04:58, August 21, 2013 (UTC)(Bing: Danbooru, trap)
- Keep. Funny in its own way. -- HIPSTER T)alk C)untributions B)an 21:08, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. I don't think it should exist. Anton (talk) 10:20, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Of course not. This article about a child writing about his bowel movements is not here to amuse any typical reader but to amuse the writer by pranking the reader. It survived VFD in 2006 and has repeatedly been used as the fecal gold standard in comparing other equally selfish submissions. It went to VFH during the phase when the pranksters were trying to weaken this website, just before quitting it. Spıke Ѧ 11:35 19-Aug-13
|
Comments |
- Comment. I guess it shouldn't go as I have referenced this article a few times and its deletion will just leave a load of red links all over the shop. It remains crap of course but I will call it a 'negative placeholder' since it will stop people creating similar like articles that will be even more stupid than this hoary old example. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 09:21, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
- And how exactly will it do this? Spıke Ѧ 09:46 22-Aug-13
|
Score: -3
|
Keep (4) |
- It could be saved. The first bit, approximately one old screenful, is of course to prank the reader, and has no humor except a weak attempt to imitate AAAAAAAA!. But the literary critique that follows is well-done. Of course, the templates at the top and the bottom that guide the reader's reaction, and the self-congratulation of the author at History, do not belong. This could be the Uncyclopedia article on any literary classic, beginning with the puzzled assertion that the entire book contains only "Cunt cunt cunt cunt crap crap shit" and then analyzing this mystery. Spıke Ѧ 11:45 19-Aug-13
- But why can't this critique exist in another article with a good title? Anton (talk) 14:58, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
- A "good" title being one that a reader will actually look up in our encyclopedia, that is exactly what I hope happens to this article. Spıke Ѧ 15:22 19-Aug-13
- Keep. Again, an in-joke with a history here. I'm not a fan, but others are or were, and if was saved four times from VFD. imnho that should make it immune from further prosecution. Aleister 17:42 20-8-'13
- A true Uncyclopedia classic. Must be fate that I decided to log in today.--Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 14:27, August 21, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. Oh man, I am such a coward at love. If I wasn't, I'd be making out with a cute androgynous canadian... don't ask. --The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 08:29, August 22, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (1) |
- Full of crap and shit! It is so terrible, that I would like to vote again. Anton (talk) 10:12, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This article is actually an in-joke with history. But its humour chased me away as the reader. The article has survived four VFDs but I hope that now it will get removed. By the way, Kip the Dip is the person who nominated it on VFD at the fork. Anton (talk) 10:19, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Kip, below, discloses that the Hebrew text of his in-joke article says, "Eat shit" and he sees this as appropriate, evidently for us. Nearby, he points us to a list of equally worthless contributions. Spıke Ѧ 11:45 19-Aug-13
- In the spirit of the holiday season for which that spoof was written and for the sake of continual non-seasonal love, peace and tolerance, I would like to retract the implications I made that editors of the alternate Uncyclopedia can "go eat shit". -- Kip > Talk • Works • • 08:57, Aug. 20, 2013
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. In
it's its current state, as of today that is, it looks like a very promising work in progress that makes me laugh. There is a slight danger of only getting the jokes if you know who he is but then how could you write an article about him without making specific jokes about him? Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:49, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep.In my opinion, any article on this trans-Atlantic wiki should inform any reader of who the subject is, and give him a good sense that humor is being undertaken. It need not give the reader all the context he needs to laugh at every joke; that would bog it down for readers in-country. Articles on national media celebrities don't have a notability problem. Spıke Ѧ 13:14 19-Aug-13
- OK, that's good then. Just wondering whether everytime we need Spike to tell us the exact Uncyclopedia rules we ought to re-enact the scene in the 3rd Pirates of the Carribean where they consult the Pirate Code. I don't mean that in a hostile way to Spike, it's good he knows it all or we would be lost, I just think it would be funny if we did. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 13:18, August 19, 2013 (UTC)
- I do not have understanding that is denied to you. That is why I began with, "In my opinion". Happily, it is never taken the wrong way when one voter refers to another as a know-it-all. Spıke Ѧ 09:46 22-Aug-13
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Bad article. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 17:29, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I fully agree but as Romartus said on the talk page of the article, it is a place holder. By the way, in future, please, put {{VFD}} at the beginning of the article you nominate here. Anton (talk) 18:45, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Jonathan Ross is a lisping British television presenter. This is not the article previously VFD'd but an attempted restart, by a new Uncyclopedian who does not know how to add illustrations to an article. The rules require the nominator to examine the history of the page, and either this or looking at the talk page would inform you that an Admin (Romartus) has taken it under his wing. Spıke Ѧ 19:33 18-Aug-13
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. One of the many articles that is not funny. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 17:31, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Vote closed. Read the Deletion Policy. Too new for VFD. I have been trying to coax the author on his talk page to use his considerable talent to do what we do here and not to develop a personal-fantasy story-arc. Deleting this new user's work is premature. Spıke Ѧ 19:17 18-Aug-13
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Because lists from the 100 cannot be replaced, only modified. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 09:57, August 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Why? Because of the template (the list of 100 worst lists)? Anything can be replaced or modified. Spıke Ѧ 14:25 4-Aug-13
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. I don't think that this page is worth existing because it has nothing except for the song titles (which cannot be funny for the readers who haven't heard this songs, except for one or two cases). And, of course, the list is irritating. Anton (talk) 15:03, July 29, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The contribution of new user Ireallylikebacon was an unfunny expression of his own opinion against a certain rock band; however, the one that is now first, the theme song from Jaws, is hilarious and relevant if the male should be affected by the teeth-in-vagina myth. So my only problem with this article is common to all our Worst 100 lists, and is the problem we have stated in HTBFANJS with lists in general: They invite cruft and usually tell the same joke over again. Spıke Ѧ 15:15 29-Jul-13
- Vote closed. Stalled after 20 days. Spıke Ѧ 19:44 18-Aug-13
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. It is not that bad. I don't like it completely but will try to save it. By the way, it was nominated for deletion in 2008 but then was kept. Anton (talk) 18:42, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. It is not that bad. Written by Anon and mostly unchanged since 2007 except for the addition of cyberbullying, vulgarity, and listcruft, which I have just pared back. Spıke Ѧ 19:29 18-Aug-13
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. This article is several paragraphs long and is not funny. Nobody would look at this article to give good response about it. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 17:21, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This article was accidentally resubmitted for me, and this page was still no use at the time I resubmitted it, and I found a VFD archive with the previous nomination, and now I decided to make a forum topic here to further solve a nomination to delete this. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 19:31, August 18, 2013 (UTC)
- Vote closed. Nomination was withdrawn. Spıke Ѧ 19:36 18-Aug-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Why?:Phi Anton (talk) 14:09, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Evidently phi is a natural constant comparable to pi, though the author seems confused as to whether they are the same. However, overuse of <math>, overuse of quotations, lists, blocks of numbers, will fatigue the reader faster than it amused the author. Spıke Ѧ 22:28 11-Aug-13
- Delete. Unencyclopedic and random. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 05:40, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Worthy of a better article. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 18:21, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Could find no better version in the history. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 19:34, August 16, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A template that exists in order to insert the exact same text (a dialogue) into many different articles. Usually called with {{Admin}}, about which, see below. In other words, it generates filler and a prank. No remaining uses in mainspace. Spıke Ѧ 20:27 13-Aug-13
- Delete. The text is utter wank anyway. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 11:17, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Didn't even know that existed! Bye-bye. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:39, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Though the idea is pretty funny. Anton (talk) 17:53, August 15, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Don't need it. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 18:20, August 15, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. This template is used on one of our featured articles, namely Banned from the Internet, and serves a purpose there. The prank is a historic part of its humor.---- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 08:01, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't think it's particularly malicious, and removing it from all the articles it's used in would waste too much time that could be better spent. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 11:17, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Names of Uncyclopedians should never occur in mainspace articles. Please tell me why you would ever want the name of an Admin, generated at random, to appear in any other space, either, unless you were pranking the person reading your message by seeming to make a comment about a specific Admin but later being able to point to the code and say you were not doing so. Spıke Ѧ 20:02 13-Aug-13
- Delete. It would have been funnier when we had more than 5 active users... cough. *Denza runs--The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 20:10, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Significant opposition to deleting. Spıke Ѧ 13:00 14-Aug-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This musical instrument is probably a lot better than the article about it. Dates back to 2007, when DarthChedder (maybe, not exactly his name) created a complete non-encyclopedic story about the invention of the instrument. The current version is better than that but still does not deserve the mainspace. Anton (talk) 13:28, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This article is not exactly good enough to be in the mainspace, much like Anton199 assumed. Like Myki and Molten Gay, Ukulele has been improving the original revisions over time, but still very bad and not still funny at all either. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:46, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. If I were to delete the bickering quotations, listcruft (Famous Brands and Bands That Used Ukulele), and the (fake?) external links, as I often do to start a clean-up, there would be nothing but a pointless piece of whimsy. Spıke Ѧ 22:35 11-Aug-13
- Delete. Ukelelemusic.wav --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 17:58, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 17:31, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This is a page that I have seen sit here since almost a month where I found it first created by an Anon who has very few contributions from that time so far. --Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 21:14, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This will not be the first Anon we have to explain that we are writing an encyclopedia, not a comic book. It gets worse when the humor turns to navelism (Uncyclopedians cracking wise about Uncyclopedia) in Section 2. It might fit in UnScripts. Spıke Ѧ 21:57 12-Aug-13
- Delete. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 18:21, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.--The Sieger of Dungeons Lord Denza Aetherwing Inventory 20:11, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Unfinished, unloved, unwanted. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:37, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The Chief Justice had encouraging comments for the author when he affixed {{AAP}} to request that photos be added. Whoever is on duty when it is time to delete this, let the deletion notice include a link to your talk page so Anon can ask for a copy back if he picks a user name. Spıke Ѧ 21:57 12-Aug-13
- Deleted as described just above. Spıke Ѧ 16:02 14-Aug-13
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. The long title doesn't bother me too much; most people come across articles through links, not searches (although it could do with being linked to a little more). It's well written and funny. If you want, make a re-direct from another, more famous drug which doesn't yet have an article. Oh, and don't die of over-enthusiasm, but I'm back. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 16:18, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
- At this writing, nothing in mainspace links to it. But welcome back! Spıke Ѧ 00:42 13-Aug-13
- Keep. As a Scotsman agreeing with an Englishman I too shall vote to keep this article part of the Union in this independence referendum. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 16:36, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. Not badly written. But that's probably the only good thing about it. The thing it is talking about actually exists but it is a chemical catalyst and not a drug. Anton (talk) 13:43, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- NOBODY WILL SEARCH FOR THIS CLUSTERFUCK TITLE! --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 21:42, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- The sales-pitch tone and the use of a greedy corporation as an alternate voice makes the article sound unencyclopedic. And yes, the page name is useless. But the article is well-written. Spıke Ѧ 22:24 11-Aug-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Made me smile in some parts but still should not be here. Anton (talk) 14:02, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This is not great, and it has a lot of parts in it where Rob and Beth have sex and also talking about some of the Godzilla revenge stuff. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 15:29, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Rob and Beth having sex is a special type of a joke which is called "repetition". But it is not used that well. Anton (talk) 15:37, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Repetition humor is good when used carefully to achieve an overall effect. But after this article's repeated warnings, then the repeated initial quotations, the reader is sick of being beaten over the head with any more repetition to see if he will eventually laugh. Every subsequent repetition is a reminder that the desperate author has no shots left other than returning to the Rob-and-Beth well. Spıke Ѧ 22:21 11-Aug-13
- Delete.Repititon is funny.Repititon is funny.Repititon is funny.Repititon is funny.Repititon is funny.Repititon is funny. But only until a certian point. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 17:55, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Sounds like a lame movie, if there is so little to parody. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 08:19, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep. Nominator started to save this article, and I've gone in and done a copy-edit too.
Others can contribute photos, or y'all can wait until the next time I am on a high-speed link. Spıke Ѧ 22:40 12-Aug-13, 00:20 14-Aug-13
- Keep. As Spike said. Anton (talk) 12:11, August 14, 2013 (UTC)
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. I noticed the quality in this article has not been improving significant enough to meet Uncyclopedia's article standards, and it is not that funny either. Newman66 (talk) 15:19, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
Formerly delete. Ticket system in Melbourne? Anton (talk) 07:45, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete.--The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 18:01, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This is the first article from Gavelrash; on whose talk page I have reported this nomination, described additional problems with the article, and described how he might proceed. If we don't hear from him, then as a courtesy to a new user, it should be userspaced rather than deleted. Spıke Ѧ 02:56 12-Aug-13
- If this is a first go as an article then I agree it can be parked into Gavelrash's user space for now. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:50, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
- The only other solution in my suggestion for this article would probably be to have someone else improve it for the time being, if this could be the case. --Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 21:04, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Saved. Spıke Ѧ 13:00 14-Aug-13
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. An awful piece of self-amusement from 2008. Get it off our wiki, even if no one will ever type the page title. Spıke Ѧ 13:41 12-Aug-13
- Analrape it! Anton (talk) 13:51, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
- There are much better ways to amuse oneself Like: Going to youtube. Going to uncyclopedia (either site). Reading badly written fanfiction. Going onto IRC. Or fapping to trap yaoi. (You don't want to know.) --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 17:53, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Wacky war,check.Ninja references,check.Revolting beyond redemption,check.---- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 06:41, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 18:21, August 13, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Author Oleper banged out this dwarf article, tagged it with {{VFH}} although he did not write a VFH nomination, and buggered off. It is offbeat but not funny. Spıke Ѧ 12:15 10-Aug-13
- Delete. Not badly written but not funny either. And it's a pity that people come here, do half of the job and go away. Anton (talk) 12:24, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I fairly agree with Anton and SPIKE, this is the garbage that is half of what we want for Uncyclopedia's article quality standards. This is not funny or exciting due to this. Newman66 (talk) 00:00, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. What about a midget apple? Stupidyoutubevideoreference.exe --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 18:02, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. There we go: five votes. Sir Reverend P. Pennyfeather (fancy a chat?) CUN VFH PLS 21:20, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. I haven't seen anything that bad with the exception of the articles I posted below. Anton (talk) 14:19, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. I must help with the harvest and burn the bad crops. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:31, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Forgive me for pouncing on the Intro, but the reader is trying to decide whether to continue with this article, and what does he read? The subject "varies between many belief systems. However, it is strangely prominent amongst most." And just like that, we lose him, even before he confronts the twin memes L. Ron Hubbard and Captain Obvious. The rest of the article is a ramble, proving that the reader was wise to quit while he was ahead. The only comedy strategy is that 10,000 is mostly a nonsense number, and this article shows how unfunny you can be when you build sections around those. Spıke Ѧ 22:07 11-Aug-13
- Delete.Per SPIKE. --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 17:54, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. The repetition in this article is cheesy and offbeat, and everything else I would say about this nomination would be very similar to what the last two votes would say. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 18:50, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. This article is not funny, and simply just containing nothing but having several paragraphs about their symptoms of EHS and also talking about a variety of medical conditions being involved on the article. Newman66 (talk) 02:15, August 10, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. This awful rant from Anon has been here for two weeks, and Anon has no other contributions. Romartus quickly tagged it with {{ICU}}--which should have expired by now--but inexplicably deleted the tags. If one other Admin concurs, I'll delete this with no further ado. Spıke Ѧ 02:58 10-Aug-13
- Delete. Anton (talk) 13:46, August 11, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Don't we have asplode and SEHS for this? --The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 18:03, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. One I tagged for improvement and then untagged. Odd. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 19:52, August 12, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. A short, stubby article full of red links and not so full of funny. How has this existed so long? -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 02:20, July 31, 2013 (UTC)
- What she said. Has gotten no substantive work, and one giant grammar step backward, since 2005. Spıke Ѧ 02:30 31-Jul-13
- Thats what she said--The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 09:56, August 4, 2013 (UTC)
- Dleete Sohlud be nemod for the bset atrcile of the yaer. Luietaennt Aontn (tlak) 10:01, August 5, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Ye Olde Junke, sitting on a prime slab of writing estate too. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 12:26, August 4, 2013 (UTC)
- None better. Get started! Spıke Ѧ 14:25 4-Aug-13
|
Comments |
|
Score: 1
|
Keep (2) |
- Boner. literally - but this is one of our feature articles. We should not, under any circumstances, delete feature articles (imnho). To do so would break the game, slip the sillymeter, crane the dodo bird. Literally. Aleister 1:15 27-7-'13
- Keep.What she said.--The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 09:59, August 4, 2013 (UTC)(Aleister is a girl, right?)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. A Terms-of-Use violation on wheels--but also a Featured Article shepherded by several Admins, mostly now gainfully employed at Urethropedia. I see no way to tone it down while preserving the author's take. Spıke Ѧ 13:35 26-Jul-13
- Delete. This image is a ticking time bomb - it is only a matter of time before it is reviewed and deleted, and without it the article isn't much good. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:46, July 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. Some of the old featured articles are extremely bad. And this is the case. Dleete Luiteeannt Atnon (tlak) 10:06, Agusut 4, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Deleting features is never a good thing. Replacing the images with something equally funny might be a better solution if required. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 16:01, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
- If you can see a way to replace the images with something equally funny without "castrating" the article, you are welcome to save it. I don't see a way, and obviously it can't stay here as it is. Spıke Ѧ 15:04 29-Jul-13
- Lack of consensus: Kept. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 14:31, August 4, 2013 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. One final article that contains a link to Gay (chemical), which we unanimously deleted; and which is total bollocks. Spıke Ѧ 14:51 24-Jul-13
- Delete. Wow, that was random. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 21:50, July 26, 2013 (UTC)
- Delete. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 15:51, July 28, 2013 (UTC)
- DISCLAIMER! It sucks, like... kirby.--The Shield of Azunai DSA510My Edits! 09:59, August 4, 2013 (UTC)
- ... Yeah. Anton (talk) 10:11, August 4, 2013 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|