From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: -6
|
Keep (14) |
- Keep. Without this HTBSANJF doesn't work. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:27, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- No dice. -- Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 19:09, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I think it's really helpful. You pros might have the art of writing funny articles nailed but us noobs need help. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 19:23, May 9, 2011
- Keep. And to those of you actually objecting to the quality of the guide, this is a wiki. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • SU&W) 19:33 May 09, 2011
- Keep As long as people realise that this doesn't prohibit stupid being funny. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:44, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. - considering it's one of the first things we tell people who misbehave to read, we shouldn't remove it. If someone wants to suggest a better version, let them write one in their namespace, and bring it up in the forums when it's mostly finished. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 20:56, 9 May
- Keep. - Do you seriously think this guide is too flawed to use, or are you just being ironic and hipster? --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 22:55, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. Alright Lyrithya, so you've already commenced your grand scheme to destroy the wiki. On one hand, you are huffing pages and referring to UN:HTBFANJS in the huff reason, on the other hand, you want UN:HTBFANJS to be deleted. Very clever. But I won't let you, no, I won't. Schamschi, 22:59, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- because i don't want syndrome to consider me "ironic" or "hipster" --Roman Dog Bird 23:56, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I wouldn't bother with this, and move on from a joke nom, except Lyrithya just huffed 175 pics when I was under the impression that the purge was over. So I don't know if this is a serioyus nom or not. Aleister 00:08 10-5-'11
- Keep. Does this mean I can nom VFD now!? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 00:41 May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Lol Funniest thing I've read in ages. -- 00:50, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I Laughed until I Cried --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 04:31, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I Cried until I Laughed. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 04:49, 10 May, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (8) |
- This is stupid.
1234 ~ 16:46, 9 May 2011
- Kerkill Not at all useful. Author needs to read BGBU immediately. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 18:04, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- PRAWN This page is forcing conformity among the users! Conformity is bad! Delete this ORGLE! -Lando-SpacePimp -------- Time, Monday Day, Year (UTC)
- Delete. Redirect to User:Thekillerfroggy. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:40, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. It needed to happen (talk) 20:58, 9 May 2011
- Delete. UBER KILL. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 21:00, 9 May 2011
Obliterate. Author failed to read HTBFANJS. wait a minute... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 00:43 May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. TL;DR Gen. Fudgem0bile Needs to pee but can't reach the cup. 04:21, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Forgive me for not being hip with the latest acronyms on the Internets (they didn't teach it in Evil Medical School), but what does TL;DR mean? -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 04:33 May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- I will rebel against Uncyclopedia's culture of mandatory sarcasm and just give you the straight answer: "Too long; didn't read." pillow talk 06:04, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
- This is daft. --Chiefjustice32X 08:47, May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. A relic from 2006. Mostly lists and BUTT POOP!!!. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:18, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Lustcrift --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 01:27, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Sucks Mattsnow 07:33, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Crappy. It's also vanity, as the sole author references himself as CEO and links to his userpage in the article. Other than that, the article relies almost entirely on self-reference (which makes a for good frosting, but the cake here is missing). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 04:20 May 10, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Wibble! In reality, New Utah is a pond in Minnesota where the Hypello are re-incarnated as fifteen-legged frogs and preserved in jars of formaldehyde and weaselpudge. The Hypello are generally stupid creatures that worship a drunk elephant idol while completely unaware of their true creator, though they also worship "lesser gods", such as Eeee-Aah-Takanikitakatiki-Takanaaaaahhh!, a terrible god shaped like a kitten-shaped donkey with non-existent wings and the head of Chuck Norris wearing a monkey mask. IT JUST GOES ON AND ON LIKE THAT. --Count of Monkey Crisco 01:48, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. The kid who wrote this back in 2006 is now a Pullitzer Prize winner. He changed a lot. Mattsnow 08:08, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- I`ve played Final fantasy x and x-2 but... something... misses from this article. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 14:46, 9 May, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Awful. Just plain awful. --Scofield 16:02, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Yet another author believes himself to be interestingly surreal but achieves only tiresome, over-worked zaniness. Burn, baby, burn. Rabbi Techno kvetch Contribs FOXES 17:28, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! 'Tish rather pointlesh (the quote on Sean Connery is the only good part). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:00 May 9, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 10
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (10) |
- Delete. Alright, I hate this. It adds absolutely no value when used, and in fact makes articles even uglier than they already are. Delete this, and remove it from every article where it's been used. --Scofield 13:57, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- WTF? -- 19:00, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Eh??? What the hell is this supposed to be? I mean, I know it's from that really awful Zelda game, but still, we do have standards here... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 20:33 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:47, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes.
1234 ~ 20:56, 8 May 2011
- Delete Infinity. and its too big, does not satire a real warning template. Its just coding aggrandizement, and does not even succeed at that. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 22:02, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. This template should be slain by the CD-i version of Gandolf while someone plays unfitting music. --Mn-z 23:09, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Fugly Mattsnow 08:11, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 11:24, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Die fuhrer sages... DIE!!! Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 14:48, 9 May, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- This might have some value of Userpages and may be used on them, I say this template needs banning from mainspace, but still be allowed in Userspace... Just a thought... -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 07:24, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- What about the mirror? --Gamma287 11:34, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. An article about something made up from whole cloth. No real theme or development. Not funny, really. It was ICU'ed in 2006 and if you know how bad standards were in 2006 you can imagine how bad you'd have to be to get an ICU tag. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:46, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- poop -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 08:13, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Asplode. Looks like it's from 2006. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:18 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Yes.
1234 ~ 22:28, 8 May 2011
- Qwertypop! -- 02:33, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
- Radioactive! --Gamma287 11:31, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. Those N'Sync sure are weird, indeed. Then again, I saw a high-school-age girl in the store today who said "Today's music is amazing" in response to the oldies on the PA system. I pity those who know nothing of the old school. Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to put on my LP of the White Album... -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:18 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Weak Keep -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 08:14, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Another "worst of" list with little thought put into it. It's a little shaky at the top by the 70's we're getting two word entries and well trodden memes and clichés (Barney? Really?). not quite as horrible as 100 Worst People, but still substandard. --Count of Monkey Crisco 07:18, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Could have been a lot better, but no! Why did they screw up a perfectly good concept? The basta-yeah, delete.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:31, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Get rid of it. I see very few (if any) actual ringtones here. Lists themselves start out weak, so they have to have a strong concept; this is just useless. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:06 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- DELETE Completely devoid of whit and imagination. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:16, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Agree with what others have said -DeathBySnowman (talk) 15:56, 8 May 2011
- Yes.
1234 ~ 22:59, 8 May 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Weak keep Needs a lot of work but I think it is a good idea and has the potential to be really funny. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:53, 8 May 2011
|
Delete (5) |
- Radioactive! This shouldn't exist. I made a funny!!! --Gamma287 04:01, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Not too good and the fact that the founding author was "Neo Illuminatus" give me the impression that this is a vanity article.---Count of Monkey Crisco 06:55, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 08:16, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- It's bad, and the subject isn't exactly one other folks are apt to pick up.
1234 ~ 23:00, 8 May 2011
- Ugh (talk) 23:16, 8 May 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: -2
|
Keep (6) |
- Keep "They're round and shit." - Tim. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 21:39, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. DURRRRR -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 07:15, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. I smiled two times. I think it is savable. We just need to take all the political bias out of it, and strip it to its raw comedy knickers. Then laugh at it because it went to school in its underwear.--K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 03:26, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Keep. It spins me right round and round! DJ Mixerr 19:30, May 7, 2011 (UTC) (talk)(contributions)
- Keep. I kinda like it. It just needs some TLC -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:37, 8 May 2011
- Keep.--Count of Monkey Crisco 04:56, May 9, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Given the notability of this topic, I tried to clean it up instead of deleting it, but I couldn't find a single funny thing in it. So I thought about rewriting it, but I can't think of anything funny about circles, either. So, let's redirect it somewhere until someone comes up with a funny concept? pillow talk 21:32, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- We might as well replace the entire page with Tim's quote. Or redirect it... that might be wiser.
1234 ~ 06:15, 6 May 2011
- Delete. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 10:40, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Tim's quote got a giggle out of me but I would gladly sacrifice it for the greater good. --Black Flamingo 03:17, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Radioactive! I think we should
delete feature this... --Gamma287 03:50, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- It amazes me that things like this survive for so long and my mediocre article almost got canned after less than a week. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:50, 8 May 2011
- Delete. Technically it's only been in its present state for a few days. From 2006 to April 2011 it just redirected to "owl" --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:44, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Admins should start doing their job when this shit is created -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 08:17, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. Since it hasn't actually existed for more than a week, I say QVFD it. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:21 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Uh... what? Someone vandalised a redirect a couple of days ago; that's all it was. I reverted it. You're welcome.
1234 ~ 23:06, 8 May 2011
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. Alright I guess -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 08:18, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (5) |
- Irritating, unfunny, and an IP wrote a better one.
1234 ~ 23:00, 7 May 2011
- Delete. It's semi-funny, but I guess only one may survive... --Gamma287 02:56, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- That made me annoyed. Isn't this site supposed to make people laugh? -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:48, 8 May 2011
- Smite. This is annoying. It should go away for its bad behavior. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 20:30 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 23:24, 8 May 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. Two paragraphs, made in 2005, time for this to die -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 22:10, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. "Two paragraphs" is awfully generous. (talk) 22:13, 7 May 2011
- That's funny.
1234 ~ 22:22, 7 May 2011
- Radioactive! This article has had ample time to reach its half-life. --Gamma287 02:53, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Boy, and that could really have been a good article too. Someone should start from scratch and make it great -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:46, 8 May 2011
- It's so bad it's scary. This is so awful, part of it is going into my personal "Hall of Shame" that is currently under construction. Once finished, it will stand as a reminder of how not to write an article. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:28 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! - a secret, when I add the category Insomniac humor, it means, I almost VFDed it, but it was late and it made me smile. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 22:05, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Maybe redirect to Sannse?
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Nom Not that funny. -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 21:19, 7 May 2011
- Delete. Might be salvage-able, but right now it's a delete. (talk) 21:56, 7 May 2011
- KILL IT WITH FIRE -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 22:11, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- I think it should be nuked. --Gamma287 02:50, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Ka-boom! -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:44, 8 May 2011
- Sterilize. Yeah, that's quite awful. Besides, we already have scam letter for this sort of thing (which would actually make a nice redirect for this after we burn it). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 07:56 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. We've already got a slightly better article which was made close to five years ago and a gloriously sexy rewrite draft written by me. Plus this article is short, unfunny and badly written as it is.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:08, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! DJ Mixerr 19:32, May 7, 2011 (UTC) (talk)(contributions)
- Delete. (talk) 22:02, 7 May 2011
- I don't think so. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 22:12, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Radioactive! --Gamma287 02:51, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Okay, now that's just bad writing.
1234 ~ 07:28, 8 May 2011
- Booooooooo!! What's this guy got against the tab button? I think a button that lets you skip a mouse-clicking step is very useful; I use it all the time. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 07:47 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Assuming that this gets deleted, is anyone going to fix up the alt I mentioned before or can we replace it with mine? MWAHAHAHAHAHA!--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:29, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- I think yours is an excellent start, but I think it could do with a couple more subpages (kind of like do not click any links) and maybe some different pictures on each one. That said, I think your rewrite is hilarious! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 07:52 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Radioactive! What is this? More ICU escapees? --Gamma287 16:42, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! --EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:08, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. VFD FTW! DJ Mixerr 19:33, May 7, 2011 (UTC) (talk)(contributions)
- Delete. (talk) 22:03, 7 May 2011
- Delete. Looks like some idiot forgot to ICU this ages ago... -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 22:13, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Random and lists... cheery.
1234 ~ 07:27, 8 May 2011
- Burninate! An article called "TERD," about poop, Star Trek and racism. How original. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 07:44 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep Quite well written. mAttlobster. (hello) 15:18, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- This is actually really good, sorry wrong guys. -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:19, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (6) |
- Radioactive! More articles to delete. This is another example of another bad movie article... --Gamma287 04:06, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. It's really not funny at all. -DeathBySnowman (talk) 04:54, 8 May 2011
- ??? .......Okay, this makes no sense at all. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 05:01 May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Count of Monkey Crisco 06:37, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- What the hell?--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 07:33, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
- Nope -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 08:15, May 8, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- I don't know what this is, but it just seems bad. You decide.
1234 ~ 01:31, 7 May 2011
- It's supposed to be a spoof of a rather obscure Nirvana song by the same name. But you're right, it's bad. --Black Flamingo 03:12, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. where was the music? I didn't see no music, just lyrics, UnLyrics are not UnTunes man, this really drains my buzz, my wave is like flat now man. woh. --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 03:34, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- nirvana would be the worst band ever if every single one of their fans were as stupid as the author. fortunately, some cool people such as myself dig them so they're not that bad. REST IN PIZZA KURT COCAINE I <3 U!!!!!!! --Roman Dog Bird 04:36, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- I love it. (talk) 05:50, 7 May 2011
- Delete. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 22:14, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- You want real bad UnTunes try to find the music in mine, and it has noise even --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 03:34, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Yours is prettier.
1234 ~ 03:48, 7 May 2011
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Radioactive! Yet again, an article has escaped ICU. --Gamma287 21:53, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Michael Jackson --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 05:35, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 05:51, 7 May 2011
- this merry group of fags will forever be known for doing a michael jackson cover. now smooth criminal is a pretty sick song, but really now, that kind of sucks. also, they smell worse than my poop. --Roman Dog Bird 06:30, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. Bandcruft mixed with randumbo. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 15:57, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:08, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- NOPE -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 22:15, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I think this might be salvageable. Judging from your description, it needs more about her boobs, though. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:30, 5 May 2011
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Extremely annoying animecruft. Half of it is true facts about Rei told in a very informal style; the other half is mostly about her vagina. pillow talk 21:27, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- I kind of like how the images are, though that's kind of stupid. The rest... kind of lacking of anything funny, unfortunately, though I wouldn't know about facts.
1234 ~ 06:14, 6 May 2011
- Needs a concept. It just seems like a ton of unrelated cruft about the same character. UN:N (talk) 16:21, 6 May 2011
- Delete Infinity. - Clearly I am not the target audience of this article, but is its target audience our audience? --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 03:31, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. I've seen the entire NGE series and End of Evangelion so I AM the target audience and I find this 10% funny and 90% annoying. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:46, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Sadly, Rei Ayanami must ASPLODE! DJ Mixerr 19:28, May 7, 2011 (UTC) (talk)(contributions)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Yukky -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 09:48, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 21:57, 6 May 2011
- Radioactive! How do these things keep surviving ICU?!? --Gamma287 22:00, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Infinity. sigh --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 22:11, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. And redirect to ChiefjusticeDS. (that was a joke, please don't ban me) --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:22 May 6 2011
- Meh. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 05:36, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete.--EpicAwesomeness (talk) 17:08, May 7, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. This seems to be a pretty good article, especially if I were Croatian and would get the jokes. But even as a non-croatian (my loss and Croatia's gain) I smiled if not guffawed, and some of the pics and presentation work well. Just doesn't seem like a VFD page to me, a bit too well done and with more content than I think of when considering deletions. A good find though. Aleister 13:37 5-5-'11
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Is there any real humor here? I can't find any, not even hilariously bad humor. It's possible that this will appeal to some narrow demographic. If someone can prove that, I'll gladly withdraw this one. In the meantime, all I see is utter nonsense and crap. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 08:47 May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. - I like the last .gif-image. It's not enough grounds for keeping the article around. Jokes should make sense outside
Lithu umm.. Bulg errmh... Rumania That Eastern European Country, You Know! -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 14:00, 5 May
- Well, it could be made to look pretty, but reading it was just... eh? Random, I suppose.
1234 ~ 06:02, 6 May 2011
- Delete It's not TERRIBLE, but it's also not terribly notable. I don't know our demographics, but I'd venture to say that the guy who helped free Croatia isn't a very widely searched topic. We don't have an article on Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Precedent.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 22:10, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Infinity. was deleted but not so noted, ~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 22:16, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Apparently about the director who brought us "The Fly" and "The Dead Zone" in the early 80s; I know that from looking him up, not from the article, though. pillow talk 21:22, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Agreed. --Black Flamingo 21:26, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 21:28, 5 May 2011
- Double agreed Stupid, unfunny, listy. What a crappy article. -- 21:28, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Making up crap sure is fun.
1234 ~ 06:08, 6 May 2011
- Smite. I've always considered Cronenberg a visionary in film. Videodrome implanted some images in my brain that will never disappear. This article is just stupid--he deserves better. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 07:41 May 6, 2011 (UTC)
- I was trying to think of a Cronenberg film I liked, thanks for that. --Black Flamingo 16:27, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 3
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. A barely comprehensible string of "jokes" about terrorism, religion, of course, sex with camels. Enjoy. --Black Flamingo 19:35, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 21:29, 5 May 2011
- It's bad.
1234 ~ 06:06, 6 May 2011
|
Comments |
- Comment. Trying to read this, it occurred to me there is a link between Jinnah, Dracula, Frankenstein, Rasputin and a certain wizard from a well known fantasy trilogy that this writer has completely overlooked. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 06:58, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 7
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. Utter shite and hate. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 10:28, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Infinity. Shitinate what has that poor woman done to inspire such unmitigated madness? --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 13:24, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. - I thought I'd say "let's keep it", but decided to just have it removed, so I can start off a rewrite off a blank slate some day. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 13:52, 5 May
- Delete. Ha-hah... lesbian. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:49, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 21:30, 5 May 2011
- It should be decent when Luvvy replaces it, but no need to keep this.
1234 ~ 06:05, 6 May 2011
- BURN IT. Bleah!!! -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 07:13 May 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Comment. - This lady is familiar to us about fifty million housewives throughout the US and Canada, who elect to watch Food Network Daytime shows over daytime soap operas... So I'll give it a spin in my user space. Go ahead and exterminate it from mainspace, I kept a working copy... -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 13:52, 5 May
- Comment. Looks a bit like the anti- 'kitchen goddess' Nigella Lawson. Go ahead Luvvy, serve up a treat for the bon viveurs here. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:03, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. The article's lady is an Ex-White House Nuclear Policy Adviser (WTF?!), who bought a food emporium, befriended Antichrist and The Big O, got some books published, had a segment on Martha's show until she got a show of her own, and she also sells over-priced waffle mixes with her "brand-name"... Yeah. Sounds like something that could be worked on, without even breaking a sweat. Lawson would also make for good humour, since there are multiple parodies available, most notably by British mostly-all-female comedy troupe Smack The Pony... I don't know what Garten did to deserve the current excuse for an article, but its existence reminded me that it could be done, too. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 07:17, 6 May
- I have no idea who this person is. I was actually expecting some silly reinventing of "In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida" (which would have been much better than this crap). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 07:22 May 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Comment. This article would find a better home on ED. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 07:19, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Complete Bunk. A really bad copy of orgy, one that is repetitive and nonsensical. Memey, too (bananas, Michael Jackson, Numa Numa, we've heard it all before). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 09:03 May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Short trousered stuff. I suspect the writer is below the age of understanding what he is writing about. --RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:54, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. --Black Flamingo 19:16, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. (talk) 21:31, 5 May 2011
- I haven't heard it before. Well, not that I recall, anyway. Still not funny, though.
1234 ~ 06:03, 6 May 2011
|
Comments |
|
Score: 11
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (11) |
- Delete. Okay, this is how a list article works: You make an entry relevant to the subject matter then you commit two or three sentences describing that entry. These sentences set up a comical simile, spoof, pun or ironic contrast which we call a "joke". Venting your bowels and restating the capsule description of the subject matter is not a "joke". Single word descriptors like "William Shatner: Shit.", " Lady Gaga : Ugly." and "Norman Tebbit : Skinhead." Do not qualify as "jokes". Ambiguous, semi formed opinions like "Lil Wayne: Don't even get us started!" don't even count as complete thoughts, much less "jokes". Therefore, 100 Worst People, being almost completely devoid of "jokes" is not an "article" and should get "deleted" like the "fly covered pile of idiot's offal unceremoniously lest in the church pew" that it is.--Count of Monkey Crisco 19:24, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
- I thought I'd ICUed this... but it must have been another terrible list. Ugh...
1234 ~ 19:30, 4 May 2011
- Delete. (talk) 22:24, 4 May 2011
- Burninate! I love the furnace, so much... --Gamma287 22:33, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
- It's so bad it's scary. Per Count, entirely devoid of jokes. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 23:48 May 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh *vomits* --(talk) 23:49, 4 May 2011
- Delete Infinity. I even checked out some of the other lists, and this does suck the big unwashed organ --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 01:32, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete My soul feels broken. mAttlobster. (hello) 09:50, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 10:55, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Eh?--Respond 13:31, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- -- 19:20, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- is this a record? this is a pretty high score --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 19:33, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
|
Score: 4
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. 75% lists, 20% mostly factual recounts of actual pro wrestling matches, 5% Teh Gh3y, 0% well written.--Count of Monkey Crisco 19:04, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
- None of which is funny, I might add.
1234 ~ 19:33, 4 May 2011
- Radioactive!. Call in HAZMAT. --Gamma287 01:46, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. Seriously, that's just disgusting. -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:58 May 5, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. All the shit memes you're sick of in player's guidebook form. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:52, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Oh, looky... giant lists and exclamations and random crap! Yay!
1234 ~ 19:34, 4 May 2011
- Radioactive! Everone knows that there's no way to defend against a grue, anyway. This article is one big list, too. --Gamma287 01:58, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Burninate! Per Lyrithya. Now, use extreme sarcasm! (I should make a voting template that says that). -- Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. 03:53 May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Infinity. UnBook? not even an instruction manual for an UnGame --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 19:35, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5
|
Keep (0) |
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. What's worse than an all wibble article? Wibble: The Musical! --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:10, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Uh...
1234 ~ 19:34, 4 May 2011
- Ugh. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 20:18, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Infinity. And the Hammy goes to: UnLyrics? --K evilLips MUN,CM,NS,3of7 22:10, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
- Delete. Thanks to this article, I lost four points on my I.Q. --Gamma287 22:37, May 4, 2011 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1
|
Keep (4) |
- Keep. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs KUN PLEB 07:15, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
- Looks salvageable to me. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:10, 6 May 2011
- Keep. I've done some clean-up and formatting fixes, so it looks a little better. Not that bad of a page, imnho, and could be a feature with a few days work on it. Aleister 10:51 6-5-'11
- Keep With a rewrite tag.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN [talk] 22:14, May 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. I think this was the Justine Bieber of WoW articles - an article whose unfunniness was tolerated as an alternative to the main article because at least it had a concept whereas the main article was just total shit. But then Gerrycheevers came along and turned World of Warcraft into a FA, and now this is just nasty week-old leftovers. Virtually the entire article is composed of listcruft. pillow talk 21:36, May 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Obliterate. (talk) 21:39, 5 May 2011
- Meh.
1234 ~ 06:22, 6 May 2011
|
Comments |
|