From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at VFD.
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Some humour in the middle, but overall rather bad. Anton (talk) 08:33, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Website electioneering does not belong in mainspace; expired in-joke; also, not funny. Spıke Ѧ 15:26 27-Jan-14
- Delete. "What happened to the cheery Australian lady who used to make memes about penuses?" "RAHB's gone. They're all gone. And we're back. The annoyingly funny people who make original uncyclopedic articles that make the reader laugh and are unaccountably still running parody websites." Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 19:45, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Low regional navelism. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:58, January 29, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (3) |
- Why you no love RAHB's penis? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Lovable penis be lovable. Aleister 19:37 27-1-14
- Forahb Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 14:53, 31 January, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Stolen humor. Develops a hoax invented on another website, referenced at the bottom of the page. See its talk page: It was close enough to the other website to be called plagiarism in 2006. Spıke Ѧ 01:33 22-Jan-14
- Delete. Seems somewhat pointless to have it here. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 18:00, January 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 20:52, January 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Agreed, we don't need many articles from hoaxes that no one will be interested in reading. Newman66 Visit my table here! Contributions My works 13:40, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Not very great, and if it's stolen from somewhere else... Anton (talk) 19:20, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Silly. It is protected, so I could not add a VFD template, sorry. Anton (talk) 08:36, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Stubby; one half of a pointless story arc. Spıke Ѧ 15:28 27-Jan-14
|
Keep (3) |
- Anton, SPIKE withstanding, this page is one of the most iconic in-jokes on uncyclopedia. That's why it was protected. It is, in effect, a National Treasure of Uncyclopedia. Thanks, though, for being so interested in cleaning out the drudge. Aleister 19:29 27=1=14
- Keep --ShabiDOO 21:20, January 28, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. As much as I dislike it, the article is used as a reference point in a lot of past discussions. Should be allowed to breathe still as a generic example but would remove imitators. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:01, January 29, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- {{VFD}} added and clock reset. Spıke Ѧ 15:28 27-Jan-14
|
Score: 3 • voting closed
|
Delete (4) |
- Delete. Mentioning the joke in the re-written title (A Toy Rocket that Runs on Live Rocket Fuel!) creating a stub article full of pointless quotes and random unfunny memes and content on an un-encyclopedic title and topic. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 10:50, January 5, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Quotecruft in the service of boosterism. Spıke Ѧ 13:55 5-Jan-14
- Delete. Lost in Randumbo Space. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:08, January 17, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Childish. Anton (talk) 19:22, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- 600 hour rule. Aleister 11:58 30-1-14
- If you voted to keep this only because you want the nomination to be removed, please consider the fact that if you remove your vote, the article will probably be deleted with 4 votes against it. Anton (talk) 19:22, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- As there was no support shown in over a month — four votes against the article and one vote against the process — the article is gone. Spıke Ѧ 14:41 8-Feb-14
|
Score: -1 • voting closed
|
Delete (1) |
- Delete. Sorry Anton but an article with just two pictures, one category and literally no other content is just bad. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 21:01, January 22, 2014 (UTC)
Delete. The purpose of the page seems to be to use a pictorial essay to make the political point that control of information as condemned in 1984 is alive and well in Russia. Only, we are a website for funny writing. 21:44 22-Jan-14 Rescinded Spıke Ѧ 20:54 5-Feb-14
|
Keep (2) |
- I tried to work on it recently but couldn't get any ideas.
- But actually it's just not finished. I agree that the article, in its current shape, is bad, even considering the fact that the real article is not Minitrue but Minitrue/Second, which the reader, as I hoped, would access using the main link on the Minitrue page. But I will move it to the original page, because now I understand that people very rarely click on links inside articles.
- And finally "Minitrue" was not based on images, I just thought that they would look a lot better if they were on a separate page. If I have any time, I will rewrite it and so thank you for the push Anton (talk) 16:37, January 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. Rewritten page does what it sets out to do. Spıke Ѧ 20:54 5-Feb-14
|
Comments |
- Comment. If this is some kind of an in-joke or such, could someone please explain it to me? --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 21:03, January 22, 2014 (UTC)
- Minitrue is a language used in George Orwell's 1984 (famous book about the faults of a Communist society) in which English words and grammar have been simplified so that there is no possible way to say anything bad about the state as only "appropriate" words exist. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 07:06, January 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment. Anton says he will do a re-write. I think the best way to save Minitrue is to write an article in the style of minitrue on the topic of minitrue and replace Minitrue and Minitrue/Second with that. I will give Anton time to do this (or something better) before casting my vote. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:39, January 23, 2014 (UTC)
- Rewrote it! Anton (talk) 20:41, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Not funny or original. Anton (talk) 11:22, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 12:44, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. How is this even funny? Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:19, January 24, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Category:Pages that look like the things they're about should not be a government job with pension. A page whose name declares that it is random characters, and is in fact random characters, is neither funny nor clever. It has one joke (This website is supposed to be an encyclopedia, but Hah! I am not!) and tells the one joke over again with every new paragraph, and it attracts anonymous editors (those sufficiently also unfunny and unclever) to do more of the same. It's a waste of the reader's time. Spıke Ѧ 21:39 24-Jan-14
- Delete. Boring cobblers. SIR MAC BOSWELL [†] 15:49, February 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. As a bit of a newbie, I hesitate to cast my first VFD...but if any article justifies it, this does. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 00:10, February 9, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- I've liked this one since I first saw it. We are not an encyclopedia, we are a satire site that has a foundation of an encyclopedia, but has many other aspects. Aleister 20:33 25-1-14
- When the "many other aspects" extend to a page of random keystrokes, VFD must act. Spıke Ѧ 15:33 27-Jan-14
|
Comments |
Why not roll back the article to a reasonable previous state and lock it to prevent unfunny anon edits? --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:04, January 29, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Half complete article that does an IRC version of Star Wars and only makes it part way through episode 2. No humour for reader if they can be bothered to read. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:01, January 25, 2014 (UTC)
- Guess you had to be there. As I note at Forum:Monty Python Clear-Up Effort, everything referenced in {{Wargame}} should come here; and if the issues are identical, not a separate ballot for each, please, as long as it is unambiguous what you propose to delete. Spıke Ѧ 15:06 25-Jan-14
- Delete. Concur. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:53, January 29, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Not great. Same idea is used at Napoleonic Wars (video game) but that one is funnier. Anton (talk) 15:24, February 2, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Self-amusement which spirals up it's own arse. SIR MAC BOSWELL [†] 16:53, February 8, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- "A song...you should hate with a fucking passion." In Anton199's Forum, PuppyOnTheRadio said this one should be on the list, and only declined to nominate it on a technicality. It's listcruft that doesn't amuse nor even successfully criticise the song. Spıke Ѧ 15:22 26-Jan-14
- Delete. "In Ukraine, Revolution delete YOU!" Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:41, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Yes. No. Anton (talk) 15:52, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. It's a poor idea, it's just that it's poorly executed. SIR MAC BOSWELL [†] 17:18, February 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Too vanilla. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 23:25, February 11, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- But I liked this:
Anton (talk) 15:54, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
- Then steal it. It's what the pros do. --Nikau (talk) 05:37, February 6, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 1 • voting closed
|
Delete (3) |
- Delete. Repeats memes and stolen jokes. Unoriginal humour. See forum for more details. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 15:39, January 26, 2014 (UTC)
- And now for something completely different! Anton (talk) 19:25, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I noted a lot of ordinary-sounding stuff there. Nearly read like a bio. Phrank Psinatra (talk) 20:52, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Keep.. I wouldn't mind keeping the images but the article does need a major re-write. I could do that.--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:42, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. The German peanut joke made me chuckle...sad but true. Rewrite it with that bit left in! KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 00:57, February 14, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Guess this should be one I should have a hack at since it is from my era. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 07:55, January 29, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Response to the article above. I could not add a {VFD} there as well. Anton (talk) 08:37, January 27, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Other half of the pointless story arc. Spıke Ѧ 15:29 27-Jan-14
- Delete. See above for my reason in supporting the original but removing the meme as an article series. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:03, January 29, 2014 (UTC)
- In that vote, now archived, Romartus wrote: "As much as I dislike it, the article is used as a reference point in a lot of past discussions. Should be allowed to breathe still as a generic example but would remove imitators." Spıke Ѧ 10:16 6-Feb-14
- Delete. More pointless drivel. SIR MAC BOSWELL [†] 17:11, February 8, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. It doesn't do a thing for me. Phrank Psinatra (talk) 20:54, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 17:51, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Boner. Iconic answer to iconic rant. Aleister 19:33 27-1-14
|
Comments |
- {{VFD}} added and clock reset. Spıke Ѧ 15:29 27-Jan-14
|
Score: 6 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Why is this needed? There are only two talkpage archives linking to it and the only differences between it and the real main page (that I spotted) is the template at the beginning of it and "An encyclopaedia that any son of a bitch can edit" instead of "An encyclopaedia that anyone can edit". I don't think this makes the original page funnier. Anton (talk) 20:45, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
- I agree. Phrank Psinatra (talk) 21:02, February 12, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Another page whose only claim to fame is its theme of "X is not X" (and supposed immunity by virtue of being In The Style Of The Thing It's About, or In The Style Of something). Also, Category:CRIMETHINK. Also, shows up as a false positive in many WhatLinksHere reports, the reason I recently cleaned up several historic false starts of the UnNews Front Page. Spıke Ѧ 02:23 13-Feb-14
- Delete. Seems somewhat redundant. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 08:08, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Per above. -- Simsilikesims(♀GUN) Talk here. 08:51, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 17:51, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Not funny. Anton (talk) 18:10, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Formula-based running joke. Spıke Ѧ 18:37 13-Feb-14
- Delete. Like a fifth generation copy of that time someone photocopied their bum at the Christmas party.--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:45, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Who would ever find it? And if they did...who would find it funny? Nobody x 2. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 00:25, February 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:32, February 15, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- I am trying to save as many good My sojourn's as possible at UnBooks:My sojourn. This one did not convince me that it is worth saving. Anton (talk) 18:20, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Not very funny and we have plenty of pages about Uncyclopedia already. Uncyclopedia, for example. I think that's enough. The author himself did not think this would survive. Anton (talk) 14:39, February 9, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Again, this is not an in-joke but a knock-off of an in-joke (Uncyclopedia is the worst), and emeritus author Hindleyite is not walking through that door anytime soon to "revisit" it as he promises on its talk page. Spıke Ѧ 15:07 9-Feb-14
- Delete. Title and prologue let us know that Uncyclopedia is the best while the rest of the article, except the section dissing Encyclopedia Dramatica[1], indicates otherwise. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 17:51, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Not even a wry smile did I manage. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 00:39, February 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. 5-points for the win! Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:04, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- ↑ Again, this part comes in contrast with the general joke of the page, which is that E.D. is actually the best and Uncyclopedia is not
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- The fact that it is an in-joke does not make it funny automatically. If I were to analyze the page, I would say that the only thing that can make the reader laugh is the contrast between what he expects and what he gets. But no, this is not very effective. The Butt Poop series probably should not get exterminated completely but bad articles belonging to that species should. And yes, I mean - no, I am not going to analyze anything here, I am just voting to delete it. Delete. Anton (talk) 18:19, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I am not going to analyze anything either. Spıke Ѧ 18:38 13-Feb-14
- Delete. Objectively rubbish, and if two guys who "get" the in-joke have voted for it... KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 00:48, February 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:32, February 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:06, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Not clever. Anton (talk) 18:28, February 13, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Goatse. Spıke Ѧ 18:39 13-Feb-14De
- Delete. Not funny. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 00:32, February 14, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 14:32, February 15, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Nope. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:06, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Remove, recycle the electrons and move on. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:29, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. In-joke. Not funny to outsiders. • Puppy's talk page • 10:17 am 16 Feb 2014
- Delete. I don't think it's funny for all the insiders as well. Anton (talk) 10:26, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. In 2007, user MrMetalFLower, who cannot rhyme but is a fan of the Guillemots (remember them? remember him?) modifies lyrics of a song to give it nominal Uncyclopedia relevance to induce readers to go to another website and hear the original. If there is any funny anywhere, someone else did it and this is nothing but an advertisement. Spıke Ѧ 13:11 16-Feb-14
- Delete. Not funny. Not clever. Not interesting. If it can't manage even one out of three... KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 16:04, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. This is not X-Factor, you're gonna have to do better than holding a picture of a cute cat sitting on top of your dead dad, who died trying to save your now-dead brother, with your only remaining arm. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:35, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Vanity. Not funny to outsiders. • Puppy's talk page • 10:17 am 16 Feb 2014
- Delete. Was kept some time ago. Some people like it very much (Aleister, for example), so maybe it can be moved to someone's userspace? Anton (talk) 10:24, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete
and move to my userspace. I'd originally vote Keep. but since this Uncyclopedia has adopted a highly encyclopedic approach to articles, I vote delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 10:47, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Quoting my vote from last September (Nominator, please fix the new system so these links to inside an archive work again!): This article, about RAHB (fallen-away Uncyclopedia Admin who did indeed talk a lot about his dick) is ranty, hard on the eyes, takes a detour into tedious repetition that has nothing to do with RAHB, and does indeed assume the reader knows RAHB and revels in bullying. Spıke Ѧ 13:19 16-Feb-14
- Delete. I am taking the view that it being an "in joke" (I assume) before my time does not excuse it from having to be at least funny in one place. I read every word...it has no merit whatsoever. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 16:19, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Going, going... Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:37, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- No, this uncy has not adopted a highly encyclopedic approach to article. Same as always. Aleister 15:45 16-2-14
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6 • voting closed
|
Delete (7) |
- Delete. In-joke. Not funny to outsiders. (And I know what people say about this, but I honestly cannot get any laughs out of it.) • Puppy's talk page • 10:17 am 16 Feb 2014
- Delete. What is this? Anton (talk) 10:22, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Obliterate. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 10:53, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Removing this will guarantee that Mnbvcxz will never return. No more Preggo stories. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 11:37, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Another article in the old campaign to convert Uncyclopedia from a humor site to a shock site. Spıke Ѧ 13:39 16-Feb-14
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:38, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. yes pls ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:35, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (1) |
- Aleister 15:46 16-2-14
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Can only be funny for fans of both A wizard did it and My sojourn series. I am afraid I am not one of them. Anton (talk) 15:17, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Nor will the next visitor to our website; nor will he laugh at IT FUCKING NEARLY RAPED ME. Spıke Ѧ 15:20 16-Feb-14
- Needs more Mr.Winkler --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 15:27, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't see how anyone could find this funny. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 16:32, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 17:40, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
- Comment. Sojourn joke and a wizard did it? Awesome! --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 15:27, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Comment #2 Can we include That time a wizard did it during my sojourn in Canada in the nomination? It's basically the same joke (a combination of My sojourn and A wizard did it) under a different layout. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 15:27, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Anton is heroically organizing all of these he can find into My Sojourn plus sub-files. He nominates unworthy pages as he finds them. In the future, nominations can be doubled up, as long as each page is tagged and it is clear what is covered. But you cannot change a nomination when two people before you have voted, because that's not what we voted on. Spıke Ѧ 15:45 16-Feb-14
- Uh, alright. It was just a suggestion. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 16:48, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Our guidance at UN:LIST should have pointed here as an example on wheels. It is hard to delete from a bandcruft article a discography comprising a dumb list of puns when it is the complete text of an article (except for a short Intro that explains how awesome the article is). Spıke Ѧ 13:47 16-Feb-14
- Delete. I cannot read it... Anton (talk) 13:50, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I am not "anti list" myself, provided said list has some humorous entries. I got a third of the way through and it failed. If all the funny ones were at the end, apologies to the author...but I kinda doubt it. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 16:35, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- A good example of how, not to write an article. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 22:37, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Cat the Colourful (Feed me!) Zzz 13:54, 18 February, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Delete. Absurdly unfunny...no simply OUTRAGEOUSLY UNFUNNY!!!! No, outrageous is too kind a word, how about, "I ain't finding this nothing but shit." Better. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 20:52, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Author thinks this is a blank check to write anything random provided it is absurd (and not even coherent). Nominator and I discuss a better approach on my talk page, involving an article with an actual theme. Spıke Ѧ 21:05 18-Feb-14
- Delete. The author(s) have written a random article, there is nothing absurd here.--RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 21:50, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Bit of a train wreck. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 22:34, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Anton (talk) 09:33, February 20, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- No links, No pictures and definitely no humor. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 00:28, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Shows the difference between a humor encyclopedia and a personal blog, by not having humor; also shows how untrue ≠ funny. Spıke Ѧ 01:27 19-Feb-14
- Delete. Terrible. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:28, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Yep, terrible sums it up nicely. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 13:16, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I am none the wiser what this is supposed to be about. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:30, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 6 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. Not funny to re-tell campaign by use of video game. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:26, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Everything listed in {{Wargame}} should go. Spıke Ѧ 11:21 19-Feb-14
- Delete. Anton (talk) 11:29, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. To write funnily in that style requires a lot of skill. I'm afraid that on this occasion, the author has fallen short. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 13:25, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Yeah this {{Wargame}} stuff is poor Banzaikitten (talk) 15:17, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Dismally un-anything. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:49, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. I know that the point of the article is to be random but it fails and results in no humour. (Apart from the fact that the country is located in the old Austrian Empire and yet has a Asian sounding name). Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:24, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The point of the article is to be random, but the point of the website is the more challenging one to be funny. It is unlikely that anyone will look up Absurdistan to see if anyone did an article on an Asian republic that is absurd, and even less likely that the reader will be happy with what he got, given that the author is unable to make any firm assertion about the republic — as he has no comedy strategy except to throw things at the reader. Spıke Ѧ 18:38 16-Feb-14
|
Keep (2) |
- I've never seen this page, thanks for pointing it out. I lol lol at many points. It needs a clean up, but it does not hurt the wiki. Aleister 13:53 18-2-14
- Keep. The "motor sports" image is quite funny, and the first half is well written. Just about justifies its existence, although the second half needs tidying (and that's not me volunteering!) KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 22:51, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (6) |
- Delete. In-joke. Not funny to outsiders. • Puppy's talk page • 10:17 am 16 Feb 2014
- Delete. --Mimo&Maxus (Talk) 18:07, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I played BioShock, but I don't find it funny. The amount of work needed to fix it is too much, needs rewriting from scratch. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 23:09, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 14:49, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. The game is fabulous, the article is not... reads more like the ramblings of a fan, not an Uncyclopedian. SIR MAC BOSWELL [†] 11:02, February 21, 2014 (UTC)
- Userspaced. Moved to User:Anton199/Bioshock at his request for possible reclamation. Spıke Ѧ 17:27 21-Feb-14
|
Keep (1) |
- Keep. I am not sure this is interesting and funny all the way to the bottom, I am not sure the plot is clear for those who don't know the game (I don't), but it still kept me intrigued till the end (even if I skipped several sections) and I even found some funny parts. Anton (talk) 09:26, February 20, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Not in mainspace. BioShock (as Wikipedia capitalizes it) is a 2007 shooting videogame said to be similar to System Shock 2 and imagining that DNA alterations turn players into supermen. Author imagines that DNA alterations were at work on the creator of System Shock 2. Don't know why he couldn't spin this in the form of an encyclopedia article rather than in cryptic first-person form (or obviate the check on Wikipedia) but it might survive in some other namespace. Spıke Ѧ 13:28 16-Feb-14
|
Score: 0 • voting closed
|
Delete (2) |
- Delete. An article about a conjoined twin, containing unfunny sexual references and first person dialogue. Sir ScottPat (talk) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 18:04, February 16, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. I don't mind controversial humour, but I'm all for quality over quanitity and this has neither. I'm sure the writer found it much funnier than the reader, but it reads just like another article aimed at self amusement to me (like so much of what seems to appear on VFD!} Get rid. SIR MAC BOSWELL [†] 11:10, February 21, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (2) |
- Contains first person dialogue is a deleting standard?
I would almost vote to delete this one if you had written it without that line, but there is nothing wrong with first person dialogue in articles, if done well. This one isn't, it's crap, but would you have nommed the one that it's a spork of if it wasn't a feature? Aleister 20:33 16=2=14
- I read it again, and lol. Not bad at all, and keeping it does not harm the wiki. Aleister 22:37 18-2-14
- Keep. Just managed to make me smile once. I felt bad about it, and I could have just ignored this one I guess...but I'm voting keep anyway. As with lists, I am not anti First Person, provided it isn't garbage. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 22:42, February 18, 2014 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- A testimonial mostly about masturbating your Siamese twin is not all the way to Dead Baby Humor, but is most of the way. However, airing out my opinion on the best humor genres is secondary to the overt cruft we are deleting nearby. Yes, Aleister, use of the first person is unencyclopedic and is one basis for identifying a bad article. Do not vote to gripe about policy, and do not vote to gripe about someone else's vote. Evaluate the article. Spıke Ѧ 22:55 16-Feb-14
- It has one little line about masturbation, and isn't mostly about it. It is not against policy to write first person articles, people have been doing that since 2005 on this site. Aleister 22:39 18-2-14
|
Score: -3 • voting closed
|
Delete (0) |
Delete. This article is not original comedy writing. It is a celebration of another website, which was evidently founded in opposition to still another website, contributed to by people who have a gripe against that website, and recently visited by a vandal to that (and this) website who seems to want to boost his notability with a directory of that website's self-described trolls. Spıke Ѧ 20:58 19-Feb-14
|
Keep (3) |
- Keep. I will declare an interest that I have a barely used account over at RationalWiki. What's here isn't brilliant but seems harsh to bin it. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:36, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. I'll re-write it. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 09:42, February 20, 2014 (UTC)
- Keep (formerly Delete). Vastly improved, with actual humor compared to proud scrawls by offsite notables. The save to ScottPat. Spıke Ѧ 12:22 20-Feb-14
|
Comments |
- Comment. I've still got to add in some pictures and touch it up but I have fully re-written it now. Hopefully it is humourous to anyone of any view. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 12:06, February 20, 2014 (UTC)
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- A description of the in-joke, which the reader will understand himself if he reads at least two pages from Category:My sojourn. I don't know why it's needed and how it's funny. Anton (talk) 11:08, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. After dozens of these, one user sets out to document the prototype in Backus-Naur symbolic form. An unfunny commentary on other articles. Spıke Ѧ 11:23 19-Feb-14
- Delete. I don't get it...nobody who wasn't "there" will. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 13:26, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Oh so awful. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:52, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:06, February 25, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|
Score: 5 • voting closed
|
Delete (5) |
- Author describes his experience at a concert. Anton (talk) 11:15, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- I was like, OMG, this is, like, a humor wiki not a concert blog; and I was pretty much like, you know, Delete.. Spıke Ѧ 11:25 19-Feb-14
- Delete. I wonder if the author actually found it funny...can't see how. KickAssAndGiggle (talk) 13:27, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Must have been a tiny experience. --RomArtus*Imperator ITRA (Orate) ® 22:43, February 19, 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Sir ScottPat (converse) VFH UnS NotM WotM WotY 21:07, February 25, 2014 (UTC)
|
Keep (0) |
No keep votes.
|
Comments |
|