Uncyclopedia:VFH/Red Sea (whoops)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Red Sea (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Vote	Score: 9.5
Nominated by:	—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:51, June 13, 2010 (UTC)
For: 14.5	Self-Nom & For. Wow, I can't believe I just fucked that up. Anyway, monika's awesome pee review is here. Yeah. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:51, June 13, 2010 (UTC) For. -- monika 20:32, June 13, 2010 (UTC) For --Sog1970 21:08, June 13, 2010 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:54, 13 June 2010 For. I read it when I was considering doing the Pee Review for it and found it hilarious. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 09:51 Jun 14 2010 Minty. Bout time Guildy comes out with anther article I can pronounce. Would you like a cookie, sir? 02:41,15June,2010 For. --—Sah Paizure CUM DotM JotM FBotM VFH VFD FFS ZOMG ROFL WTF AAA (Tlak) 02:48, June 15, 2010 (UTC) For A good page from Guildy! When's the last time that happened? (Monday?) Nice work, and maybe just a couple of tweaks per the comments before it hits the fresh, revigorating air of the main page. Aleister in Chains 11:55 17 6 MMX Weak For. Perhaps a bit too subtle. ~ 17:44, Jun 19, 2010 For. A very well done C indeed.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  20 Jun 2010 ~ 09:33 (UTC) SIRE FREDDMOOSHA AMUSE ME 13:59, June 24, 2010 (UTC) #For. Horace Donald Westenchester 23:00, June 24, 2010 (UTC) invalid vote, user banned Rev. Zim (Talk) Get saved! 03:24, June 25, 2010 (UTC) For. Megaman126512 19:23, July 1, 2010 (UTC) For.--Sir HELPME Talk (more? --> CUN ROTM NOTM Pleb USS Pees SK ) On Saturday, 08:13, July 03 2010 UTC For. 71.186.239.17 04:47, July 10, 2010 (UTC) Weakish for. It's not my favorite article of all time, but it wasn't without its charm. pillow talk 18:23, July 12, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 5	Against. It is essentially one joke. --thehallway 20:58, June 16, 2010 (UTC) Amusing? Sure. Feature-worthy? Not for me. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Saturday, 19:43, Jun 26 2010 Against. It tears me up inside to vote like this, but I just don't think this is feature worthy. This is well-written and it was mildly entertaining, but it's just a little too dull. Sorry... -- Sir SF13 (Talk) GUN WotM RotM FBotM VFH SK Maj. ΥΣΣ 05:40 EST 4 July, 2010 Against. Sorry. One-trick pony. I prefer ponies to know at least three. IronLung 03:07, July 13, 2010 (UTC) Weak Against. Has some good jokes for a mostly one-note article. The Mediterranean line is killer, but all else falls short. T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 03:13, July 13, 2010 (UTC)
Comments:	Explanation. OK, so for the first nomination I put 'Red' instead of 'Red Sea' in the 'article=' section, though now it is fine. I guess just ignore that one? —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:54, June 13, 2010 (UTC) Also, I suspect Megaman's Against is for the article on Red and not my article because that's the article the nom was accidentally for at the time, so if one of these has to be removed it should be that one. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:56, June 13, 2010 (UTC) Duly removed. So now no-one will know what you're on about. --UU - natter 20:05, Jun 13 Excellent, just the way things normally are. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 22:00, June 13, 2010 (UTC) Hey, I like "Red"! Let's feature that too. Aleister 12:02 17 6 MMX Abstain. Lacked the LOLs for me. Otherwise it is a worthy article. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 22:54, June 13, 2010 (UTC) Abstain. I can't possibly vote against a Guildy article. But this one is simply boring, drab content. Too subtle for me. Disappointing!--Funnybony  12:58, Jun 14 Abstain. I was smiling to myself as I read it, but it doesn't really strike me as featurable. Sorry. Saberwolf116 11:37, July 3, 2010 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH