Uncyclopedia:VFH/Michael Jackson(Second round)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Michael Jackson (history, logs)

Vote

Score: 8 Dead(pan) child molesters

Nominated by:

OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN15:50, 23 Jan 15:50, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
For: 21
  1. N&F This still ranks as one of my favorite projects (Along with Great Britain) from my IC days. Got quasi featured last time, let's see if we can't get it on the front page this time. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN15:50, 23 Jan
  2. Subtle For. God, I'd like to fuck some little girls. —Sir SockySexy girls.jpg Mermaid with dolphin.jpg Tired Marilyn Monroe.jpg (talk) (stalk)Magnemite.gif Icons-flag-be.png GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 15:55, 23 January 2010
  3. For - I thought about nominating this quasi-feature a few weeks ago. That last time it was up for VFH was before MJ died. Would be our tribute. -- Kip > Talk • Works • •Sophia Commander of the Order USA! 17:40, Jan. 23, 2010
  4. For Per Socky. Those who don't get it can suck my balls. So long as they are under-age. Best thing IC did. MrN Icons-flag-gb.png HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 18:52, Jan 23
  5. Yup --I'mthedaddy 19:08, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
  6. For. My first IC participation. I sucked hard back then.. And still. Whatever. • FreddAin't Dedd • Flag of Egypt.png • Foxicon.png • 20:05 • Saturday, 23-01-2010
  7. For. --Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 23:46, January 23, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Janet, Tito, Frito, and Cheetoh. All fine musicians. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Sunday, 03:21, Jan 24 2010
  9. For. I love the fact those who preceded me avoided the obvious. Makes me proud to be part of IC. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 04:29, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Weak for It wasn't one of the funnier articles I've read, but it's well-written and is a good counterpart to the "gay pedo lol" cliche in so many of our other articles. —Paizuri MUN (Talk • Contribs • Poll!) 00:53, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
  11. For. Its funny and its not what ppl expect. Admin DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 01:36, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
  12. Sure. It's funny and doesn't take the obvious, stupid angle. (You know the one) HELPME 01:38, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
  13. Forth Yeah, read it again, studied it this time because I had time to do so, read the comments below, and, like Clarence Thomas carefully weighing the facts of "Bush v Gore", now understand the power of a few bucks in my pocket and a fifth of gin waiting for me in the cloakroom. Aleister in Wonderland 1:48 29 Jan. MMX
  14. For. Opty did do a good job in repairing and repointing this article. In consideration and recognition of what has been done here I am going to support it. Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 07:49, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
    Pardon? As usual, your voting rationale mystifies me. Pup
    Yeah thanks Romaratus, but I had barely anything to do with this one. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN17:47, 2 Feb
  15. For. FA for sure, although packed with "content" Funnybony 16:34, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
  16. Fortnight Polisz.jpgSir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj • KUN 19:15, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
  17. For. Doctorwho295 21:10, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
  18. For. This could potentially set off a huge firestorm across the internet, but I'm all for it. InMooseWeTrust 03:36, February 2, 2010 (UTC)
    Hahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
    This guy. --Littleboyonly.jpg T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly.jpg 18:12, February 26, 2010 (UTC)
    Hahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
    --Nigger Fucking Faggot Etc x1000 and Shithead N/O/T/FUCKING FUNNYR.D.B. COW! GOTM THING INCEST EATMYSHORTS GAYMUSIC HAWKMAN MF LESCLAY DON'TVOTE 06:29, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
  19. For. ~Scriptsiggy.JPGPlease talk to me. Please. MUN CUN RotM 14:01, Feb 10, 2010 14:01, February 10, 2010 (UTC)
  20. For. Duh. sausage lol 00:44, February 12, 2010 (UTC)
  21. For. Sometimes subtle, ironic humour is best. Zarbag 16:00, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
  22. For. InMooseWeTrust 05:06, March 1, 2010 (UTC) Forgive me if it's not my place to strike another's vote--no harm meant--though Moose did vote twice on this article. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:56, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 13
  1. Against. Let's see, what did I say last time? "I think this is an amazing improvement job, and better than I ever thought an article on the guy could be. And I am a huge fan of deadpan stuff. But no, I think this needs more love to really make it featurable." Yup, still agree with that - this is a better MJ article than I ever thought we'd have, but I still think it's a decent article, rather than a really good one. Looks like I'm alone this time though. --UU - natter UU Manhole.gif 11:59, Jan 25
  2. Symbol against vote.svg Against. - Per UU--Sycamore (Talk) 09:21, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
  3. Symbol against vote.svg Against. - I agree with UU, good effort, but not there yet.--User:Claudius Prime Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 07:53, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
  4. Against. --Docile hippopotamus 10:55, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
  5. Symbol against vote.svg Against. - Per UU--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 23:23, January 28, 2010 (UTC)
  6. Against. thats not funny at all,its written by a fan boy Gufcghost2 17:45, January 29, 2010 (UTC)
    You sir, fail. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Friday, 23:23, Jan 29 2010
  7. Against. Slightly funny, but not hilarious enough to merit a highlight from me Sakai4eva 04:50, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
  8. Weak against per my comments below. Pup
  9. Against. Per divisive comments a tenfold year back and that. Whattheworldis~~.PNG"MORDILLO IS FUCKING FASCIST" 14:15, February 2, 2010 (UTC)
  10. Symbol against vote.svg Against. - I didn't get much of a kick out of it. --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 22:40 EST 10 Feb, 2010
  11. Against. Shinuzi Sama 03:13, February 15, 2010 (UTC)
  12. Against. Still shit. Littleboyonly.jpg T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK Oldmanonly.jpg 20:31, February 23, 2010 (UTC)
  13. Delete. thats not funny at all,its written by a fan boy, it should be about how he molested children,now that's funny. --Bald dude.png Roman Dog Bird!!!!! :D :D :D :D :D :D :D Bald dude.png 06:29, March 1, 2010 (UTC)
Comments:
  • Comment. A commendable effort that is better that Wikipedia's ! However, it now reads a bit too straight . In fact it could appear in Wikipedia and no one would know the difference for a few hours. Laurels.gifRomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 08:30, January 26, 2010 (UTC)
    I'll take that as a compliment as that's exactly what we were going for: a Wikipedia article written by a fanboy. :) -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us.png CUN20:46, 26 Jan
  • Comment. I added the VFH template to the article. As adding a VFH to an article that's previously been nommed is a little trickly, for this one the template is {{VFH|nompage=Michael_Jackson(Second_round)}} WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 05:03, January 27, 2010 (UTC)
  • Somewhere between for and against. I really like this article as it's a clever and humorous way to deal with a tricky topic, yet one that we need. But as for the lol factor, it falls short for me. Brilliant article, but not a feature as is, and I doubt it would be without a significant conceptual change. (And there is nothing wrong with the obvious as long as it's also clever.) And as I have contributed to this would that give me a half on HoS if it is featured? Pup
Puppy, if you were in on the Imperial Colonization, yes. That's Imperial Policy, by Order of Her Majesty. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 19:56, January 30, 2010 (UTC)
The edits were post IC, but I was member of the IC when I made some of the changes... It's a grey area hence the question. Pup
I doubt anyone in authority would have a problem with it. Unless, of course, it would give you more features than they have. WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 05:05, January 31, 2010 (UTC)
We're all good then, because anyone with even the slightest bit of authority would of course have been part of the spectacular concept that is IC when this was first being done. Maybe I should actually vote for as I am a whore, apparently... Pup
Wait, a male puppy who's a whore? Should you be allowed to talk about an article about Michael Jackson? WHY???PuppyOnTheRadio 21:40, February 1, 2010 (UTC)
Wait someone here has authority? Let's stop all that nonsense talk. No one here has authority. Cos I said so. See? Oh, credit would go to the IC members I guess... That's why you should join and edit IC. If you had made a really big change Puppy then I would look into it if you asked me to. Normally though... No. Probably not. You need to do a lot to start claiming FA credit. MrN Icons-flag-gb.png HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 21:51, Feb 1
Actually had made a substantial amount of changes, and was advised not to do too much to it because it was an ex IC one, and have since joined IC... truth is that I don't really want to get half credits for anything unless it's something like Carebears which is a straight collab, and I am not a fan of doing the IC thing. Been there, tried that, but not my thing. I'm a lone wolf. Arooooo! Pup
  • Abstain. i'm a very useful tank engine. nldr - MrN9000 is not "looking for idiots", IC was perfectly fine and there's nothing wrong with how whatever you want to do here. THEY WERE CRAMMED WITH POOR VOCAB CHOICES, THAT'S ITTTT 03:15, February 14, 2010 (UTC)
    • whoops --nldr 00:04, February 19, 2010 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Information.svg The nomination was not successful. rm 20% +8 QFA ~Jewriken.GIF
This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 13:01, March 1, 2010 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Retrieved from "https://uncyclopedia.com/w/index.php?title=Uncyclopedia:VFH/Michael_Jackson(Second_round)&oldid=5088659"