From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
This page is an archive. The contents have been moved from another page for reference purposes only, and should be preserved in their current form. Discussion or voting on this page is not current. Any additions you make will probably not be read. The current version of this page can be found at Uncyclopedia:Pages for deletion.
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete per denial of recognition. --General Insineratehymn 05:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - But I think you should take it to QVFD to avoid being seen. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, you're right. Doing that right now. --General Insineratehymn 06:11, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Now, if we can get an admin or Template:Poopsmith to remove these... --AAA! (AAAA) 06:12, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete & agree --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 06:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
1.) You're absolutely right, this should be QVFD.
2.) Deleted all of them, and good fucking riddance. —RT. HON. HINOA, KNIGHT COMMANDER OF THE ORDER (BEG FOR MERCY)08:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Crap. Someone removed the NRV. Delete --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 18:39, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Quick kill. This is clearly vanity. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Vanity, crap, and written by a mentally challenged 12-year old. Just guessing, but prove me wrong. Delete --Smrt-guy 00:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Gone. —Braydie 00:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Declare peace. Mildly humourous title followed by a bunch of random names. --El Zoof 23:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- It could be so much more - such as a mildly interesting article. Delete --Smrt-guy 00:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- I believe there is an infinite plethora of crappy articles from 2005/early 2006 laying around. It is our endless goal to delete these and make the world (or at least Uncyclopedia) a better place for all. Delete. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 00:57, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Scratch
and sniff --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:56, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huff --General Insineratehymn 03:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Huffed, voting closed. -- 13:21, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Racist, stupid, badly written and still manages to be unfunny. Delete. --El Zoof 23:32, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Again, is there any way to keep the 11-year olds from writing articles? Not funny, stupid and ugly. Delete --Smrt-guy 00:20, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hideous, poorly written, and racist. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 03:04, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Huffed, voting closed. -- 13:22, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete Random nonsense, and not even funny random nonsense. --El Zoof 12:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Random + bad + ugly = Delete --Smrt-guy 20:34, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, it's the weekend, you know what it means? It means I can vote on crap! Delete for celebration reasons, and also because it sucks. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 21:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Huffed, voting closed. -- 13:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- keep/repair --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 09:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- " - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep.--Medvedev (scream) 13:09, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - I laughed, I cried (from cutting it open), I ask for a rewrite, but let it live. Smrt-guy 21:54, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- k33p - Funnier than anything I coul come up with. --El Destructeso 23:03, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well written, with some good Soviet Union jokes. In Russia, article keeps YOU!! In Russia, surprised should not be YOU!! --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:58, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- in soviet russia, article keeps you --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:03, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and repair. --General Insineratehymn 03:05, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keeper: --Ogopogo 05:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
Personally I think its pointless, random, drivel.--THE (NOT SO NOBLE) ZEROTROUSERS 08:30, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Oh Yeah, I also want to make a rewrite of it as Serviet Onion.--THE (NOT SO NOBLE) ZEROTROUSERS 08:37, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ok, well I personally want to rewrite it, in a not so random manner, but i guess its up to the majority.--THE (NOT SO NOBLE) ZEROTROUSERS 08:19, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
Kept, voting closed. -- 13:25, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- keep and rewrite a bit - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:00, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep with fix tag conditional on removing all references to "Drama" (i.e. name change). --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 02:10, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 01:06, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- BALEET!!! --THE (NOT SO NOBLE) ZEROTROUSERS 08:34, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Pointless, not funny and ugly. 3 for 3! Smrt-guy 21:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- It has potential, but I say that we should demolish and rebuild it. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Huffed, voting closed. -- 13:26, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep - Only if you change the colour. Red makes my eyes bleed. --AAA! (AAAA) 00:08, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep — but I'm biased because I just changed it quite a bit, so I guess it's kinda more "mine" now... but I swear, I really liked the original idea anyway... (/sheepish expression/) —Lenoxus 04:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- k33p - Eh, whatever. --El Destructeso 23:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete It is ugly, to the point that it hurts my eyes, and serves no pourpose, humor-wise or other-wise. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:48, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Tis' not original.--THE (NOT SO NOBLE) ZEROTROUSERS 08:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 09:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- There are enough functionless space-wasting templates on uncyc already without intentionally creating more - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:56, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ahem, taken from the template itself, "This template serves no purpose whatsoever and should be ignored at all costs." —Braydie 16:42, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Subst: onto Nothing, then delete --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 02:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
- No thanks. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:05, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I'm okay with deleting the current version, but we should give people an opportunity to perform a complete rewrite to turn the template into something a little more nihilistic (or perhaps a redirect to {{nofu}} or something similar). --Pentium5dot1 05:02, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Deleted, voting closed. —Braydie 23:54, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete This is just a formality really, NRV was removed.. slipped through the net and all that. —Braydie 16:40, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 17:12, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- 'Delete - my word it's stupid! So many things a person could write. Maybe next time a real person should try. Smrt-guy 21:57, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - Not funny. --El Destructeso 22:44, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch it --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:52, 15 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Blocky, clunky, random, and a non-topic. ----OEJ 17:42, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - and what's even fennier, someone recently added a bunch more random crap. Smrt-guy 19:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Well, it appears somebody created a piece of crap, then ZB added a NRV tag. Then somebody else came by, thought they fixed the crap up (which they didn't), and took off the tag. Regardless, delete. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 19:58, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ugghhh - THE (NOT SO NOBLE) ZEROTROUSERS 10:20, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Huh! Electrified is right, there were two applications of the NRV tag to this article -- both back in September. It's not been worked on since the end of October, though, so a 7-day NRV is long expired anyway. ----OEJ 21:00, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Huffed, voting closed. -- 11:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Complete crap. Crapola. Not funny. Did I mention it was crap? Yeah, it's crap. --Videshi 04:01, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - what Videshi said, except it's also crap. El Zoof 05:26, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huff It sucks, and there's a good possibility it's crap. Whiteside pie4eva!!! I LIKE PIE TOO! 17:12, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Wow. This is really bad.----OEJ 17:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Is there any way to pre-ban 12-year olds who are off their meds? Delete!!! Smrt-guy 19:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- De-1337 --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 19:57, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- BURNINATE!!! --THE (NOT SO NOBLE) ZEROTROUSERS 08:39, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Umm... it's new and NRVed, which means it'll probably be gone soon anyway and there was no need to VFD it... Unless you just really needed to say how much you hated it, I guess! -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:43, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- keep and do what Pentium5dot1 said; merge it with PAL and SECAM - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:53, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Comment: Here I go again rambling about consistency... If this goes, then PAL and SECAM have to go too, since I don't see how they are any better. Perhaps try taking this to Pee Review or merging all the television standards articles into one? --Pentium5dot1 04:58, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Barely Keep - guys, it is funny...I mean, "A sufficiently lovely girl" Love the Chinglish, though this page needs cleaning. Smrt-guy 21:04, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and expand. Also please respectfully to add image of the fierce look woman equipment!! "Though being with a fierce look, the woman equipment was unexpectedly skillful, so Asakura Justice Seen made a misunderstand that he is a real woman and kissed deeply." What translation software was the author using? If he composed this prose intentionally then make no misunderstand, he is a genius. ----OEJ 17:50, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Feature - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:50, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Maybe I just don't get the "joke", but this seems like random semi-English gibberish about a non-existant cartoon. BALEETED! El Zoof 02:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- It is being of the shit. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 03:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huff Chinglish, yet most of the names are Japanese? Huff for lack of consistency. Whiteside pie4eva!!! I LIKE PIE TOO! 17:14, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Hmm My guess is that if you think Chinglish is funny and know what these shows are about you'll find it funny. Not sure if it should be deleted outright because of that. --Videshi 03:06, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
- I'm not sure this is classical Chinglish. I think it may be transliterated Japanese -- ie, Japanese "translated" with complete disregard for English grammar and idiom. For example, I copied a random chunk of Japanese text from a sushi vendor website and Babelfished it to English:
- "The salmon it flies and the child, the shrimp-quail fermented soybean winds thickly with the sea urchin. Trying sharing with the companion of the workplace, and the friend how, probably will be. It does not leak to the one which is purchase, it presents the sushi bucket where news item of 10 types is settled. * Note: the sushi blacks which are to the picture do not belong to the product."
- Personally, I see a potential for great humor here: One takes the fractured prose and inserts sly puns, intentional idiocies, and so forth. I'm willing to make this article a demo project for the idea. (Please stand by, do not adjust your Uncyc, the article will be undergoing a nocturnal re-emission.) ----OEJ 18:46, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, rats bollocks. It's harder to do than I thought. The article has become mostly a series of dirty jokes and sexual innuendos. Huff it if no one finds it funny, please. ----OEJ 02:27, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Saved from the huffing bowl. -- 21:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
Keep + Feature - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- k33p - Quite possibly the dumbest thing I've ever read, but there's no point deleting it. --El Destructeso 23:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- put in photo album to look at later --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak Keep, I don't get it, but damn it made me crack up. Mr. Briggs Inc. 04:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC) eh?
- Keep. The three sections are riffs on ambition, fear of failure, and insecurity. I suspect the narrator is serving seven-to-ten in Pelican Bay for acting out with violent surrealism.----OEJ 15:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- I have never been more torn over an article than this one. It's brilliant, yet stupid. It reminds me of handwritten posters the crazies put up on light posts in Westwood. But is it Uncyc material? Smrt-guy 23:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Adopted kitty, voting closed. -- 17:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Dude...keep and expand. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 16:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, keep it, gooood times... Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- I forgot I wrote this article. I read it and it made me laugh. Keep. --Teepegg 20:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - and find Insineratehymn something to stop him... well, insinerating when he sees a list. :-P -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:46, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- keep i guess - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:28, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- No humor detected. All I see is random text and two lists. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 16:19, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Dude... delete. goshzillacorrespondence 16:42, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, there goes my buzz. Delete. It feels a bit like vanity as well. Smrt-guy 23:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Adopted kitty, voting closed. -- 17:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep. Not exactly the stuff of wet dreams by comedians everywhere, but not too crappy either. --Medvedev (scream) 14:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not feature quality, but not everything is. Maybe Yautja is more your speed NAB. Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- Keep It is a fairly decent peice of writing. User NeedABrain might want to follow up on his own diagnosis and get himself a brain prothesis. I hear the Alzheimer Company of California makes some darned good ones. -- di Mario 20:47, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Congratulations!!! You're our 1,000,000 customer playing the same joke on my user name. Your prize is a rubber lollipop, please get it at the counter and rub off. :D -- herr doktor needsAbrain [scream!] 21:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- keep on the condition that someone condenses and de-shittys it - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe I'm nicer on weekends, but we should keep it and hope it gets the attention it deserves. It's kinda funny! Smrt-guy 22:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff. I was just wondering "hey, how's the Predator uncyc article?" and so I came to this piece of useless display of cinéfilie. Predator really deserves more and this is not the kind of article that can be reformed. -- herr doktor needsAbrain [scream!] 13:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
~
- I think the fact another article on Predator already existing should justify a redirect page there. But, as you wish, I give up. -- herr doktor needsAbrain [scream!] 21:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Kept, voting closed. -- 17:11, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep - Lets keep VFD to just the dross folks... -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- Keep. The author clearly ran out of breath halfway (I know the feeling), but the base is good. --Medvedev (scream) 14:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Hey, someone read my article! Wooo...! Also, I like it... --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 17:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- yeah, this isn't blinding, but it's not bad enough for vfd - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's got a good start, and borders on funny. Just needs a little TLC, some dusting, maybe a new coat of paint. Smrt-guy 22:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- needs a lot of rewrite --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's not great, but it's not crap. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 07:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete I'm really the actual nominator, this is awful. He literally has a jar for a head? Is that really the joke? Quadzilla99 01:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Due to recent discussions here, I'm placing this up for deletion. —Braydie at 13:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Needs work. "Recently, Vietnam veterans, who had the jar implants have been winding up with knifes through there torsos"? How about knives and their? And get those ungrammatical commas out of there. The image needs an upgrade too. ----OEJ 15:37, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
Adopted kitty, voting closed. -- 17:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- keep pointing out hypocrisy is not racial hatred, although this thing should have an article to stay around --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 21:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- it's used on Racism so keep until someone finds a replacement image. the image itself is certainly not racist because it's not shitting on one race it's shitting on humans as a whole. that said the guy who uploaded it did go by the name negrowned, which isn't great - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:39, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Well, the White Power guy is a handsome, young student, while the other two are depicted as dirty, ill-mannered and ugly. --Medvedev (scream) 21:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Serves no satirical purpose, is not used in redeeming context, blatantly promotes racial hatred and is not funny. --Medvedev (scream) 13:05, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. ASAP. goshzillacorrespondence 16:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not sure about the racism charges, but I don't understand this, which makes me frightened and confused, so delete. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:57, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as unnecessary copyvio. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huff --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 08:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Huffed (phew), voting closed. -- 17:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep Some of my best friends are lists. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:32, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. goshzillacorrespondence 16:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep., it's a good list, has potential for expansion, and just look at Incinerate him's reason for deletion! Mr. Briggs Inc. 17:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- keep and fix-up - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- I rarely vote Keep, but this is FUNNY! And, those are some of my best friends. Slap on a 7-day fix, though. Smrt-guy 22:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- bad lists are common, this isn't one of them --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:03, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
Merge into racism. --Medvedev (scream) 12:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Kept, voting closed. -- 19:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- I deleted a related article, and when I came to delete that H-Bomb picture I found this. Horrible. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 00:20, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed, Delete--Jsemmens 00:40, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Pitiful AAAAAAAAA!-clone --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I think somebody wanted to make the MS-Paynt mushroom cloud into a kind of personal meme. It's spammed into The Demented Cartoon Movie in a similarly ugly, article-disrupting way.----OEJ 01:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch it Replication of the "immediate explosion" joke in TDCM --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- For God's sake. It's gneomI 12:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:32, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Huffed, voting closed. -- 17:02, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Useless disambig. I would just delete this, but I feel I should probably let you all agree with me first. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 22:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Since I was the one who tried to QVFD it in the first place, delete. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 22:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, but find a place for "Hubba Bubba, dream of lovers"!!! Smrt-guy 23:20, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - What was the point of writing this? --El Destructeso 23:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- junky junky junk --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:08, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete.----OEJ 01:24, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch it --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 04:41, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- It's borderline, so I'll say weak keep --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 21:31, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Huff Really short article and no one has contributed to it in a really long time. --General Insineratehymn 16:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- I don't get it. goshzillacorrespondence 20:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - it seems like it's basically truth, only the fictional kind. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 20:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, though thank you to Jack_mort for the explanation. I was thinking it was a GF vanity page! Still, pointless. Smrt-guy 23:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- 'kesu --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:56, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- garbage --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 01:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- It is fiction, can't find any reference to a deity called minna, it's just the japanese for 'everyone', like to get people's attention. it's coherant, i like it, but it's not funny and it's almost unexpandable - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep I find it humourous. It makes fun of all the buzzwords my boss insists on using to demonstrate his savvy (yeah right) and besides, it is biased against Microsoft. Also, it describes accurately that managers always listen to whining customers and never listen to the reasonable counter-arguments of the worker drones that are supposed to fix the unfixable. -- di Mario 20:38, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- keep - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Scanning for humor... Scan complete. Humor found: 0. Judgment protocol: Delete. --General Insineratehymn 08:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Article has suffered a fatal exception error in module humour.dll and will be deleted. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Failure to find clever way to say ... delete. goshzillacorrespondence 17:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- I was hoping for some puns on pies. Hmmm....yummy pies. Instead, I get a copy & paste from MSoft literature. If they made it MORE so, I'd say keep. Smrt-guy 22:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- <insert pie related pun here> --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:04, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Hi, guys! Hmmm.... errr... Why am I here? (shrugs) Durrhh... -- The Colonel (talk) 19:18, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Had a rewrite, re-nom if need be. Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 02/11 14:02
|
Keep |
- It reminds me of that time I forgot my medication.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
Keep - It gives me an idea. --AAA! (AAAA) 07:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- ftw?--THE (NOT SO NOBLE) ZEROTROUSERS 04:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch it --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:56, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Bored of it now. --AAA! (AAAA) 08:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Incoherent rambling doth not a funny article make. El Zoof 12:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Transwiki to ?pedia then delete. Or the other way round. -- Hindleyite Converse 13:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- i like it, but on balance, gotta go - jack mort | cunt | talk - 21:48, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Regretful Delete - I see the attraction, but it wasn't done well. Smrt-guy 22:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Somehow, this article evaded the QVFD, Delete--Jsemmens 00:49, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Step 1: Don't use a lot of headings. Step 2: Huff. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:05, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Feel free to transwiki it. —Braydie at 13:13, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep Chuckleworthy even if not the best article ever - doesn't need deleting, just expansion tag. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep If someone adds just how tasty they are. Smrt-guy 21:45, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- It's okay --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 08:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Me like. Come on - it has chemical formulae involving pigs! What more could you want? -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Silly, yet potential to become funny. -- di Mario 18:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per Strange but Untrue. --Medvedev (scream) 22:25, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's not crap.--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 00:30, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Metal pork --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep Hard to expand, yet has OK development. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- keeep - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete- I see no potential humor in the page...--Captain Kickass 06:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Me neither. Pretty hard to think of expansion. It's gneomI 08:27, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete just to teach them a lesson! Bwahahaha! Seriously - huff it. Smrt-guy 21:44, 9 February 2007 (UTC)*
- De-1337 I'm sorry, this is just not funny, it lacks quality, lacks formatting, it's abundant in red links, and is uncategorized. These are all very big no-nos. It's had a total of 14 edits within the last six months, a majority of those from the same three or four people. Overall: low quality rubbish that fails to reach even the bare minimal standard of a page on Uncyclopedia. Underserving of the crap template, and should just be deleted. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 19:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- emc..... show me where the article touched you. - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:02, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
- Keep I am willing to keep this if someone will actually rewrite it, if no one is going to go through the effort, huff it.--Jsemmens 00:25, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but please be sure to baby-sit the authors, <insert name here>! Yes you!. It is very actively being edited by what appears to be a group of adolescents. They have the drive, but not yet mastered the requirements. Should that go punished with a death sentence? Methinks notte. You, <insert name here> are now their designated mentor. Go on! Do something! I'll be watching you... di Mario 18:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Screw the username template. I hate hate hat it. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:38, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Put rewrite, it has potential. It's gneomI 08:39, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Sucks beyond belief. When it's not being a list, it's being unfunny. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 00:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's boring. Just plain uninteresting. If you can make it funny, do it, but do it soon. --Videshi 02:35, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Mired in scatological randomness. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:07, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I recall finding it funny at one point, but it's just been ruined over time. I love One Piece, and would rather have an article about it on Uncyclopedia, but I honestly feel there's nothing I can do to improve it. Roman Dog Bird 22:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- I took a look at it. As soon as I saw quotes about raping, I have but one thing say: Delete. --AAA! (AAAA) 23:03, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment: I think that I was able to remove most of the stupid raping references.--Jsemmens 01:54, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- What!? the raping was the best bit! - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep anime off Uncyclopedia! goshzillacorrespondence 16:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- delete no anime. no anime. NO FUCKING ANIME. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 21:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- cockbag, i am more than happy for uncyc to be bloated with anime articles, provided they are well written, coherant, and funny even to people who don't know the show. this is none of the above - jack mort | cunt | talk - 22:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- There's a lot of content there. If it's rewritten, as Jsemmens suggested, then it's worth keeping. Otherwise, huff it. -fish 04:40, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Comment Very true in principle especially with those two, but is this really funny? It strikes me as being 90% retarded and 10% offensive. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 06:23, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Correction: sometimes something is funny despite being offensive. That said, it takes a pretty sick mind to read the above article and laugh. We're not training psychos here. --Medvedev (scream) 07:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Defence I just hate that "being offensive" is sole grounds for deletion. And yes, some humor is funny due to its being so offensive about something no one will be offensive about. goshzillacorrespondence 11:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Un-Defence "Being offensive" is not sole grounds for deletion. Being offensive and not funny is. It's just not amusing. --Videshi 01:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- It is rather amusing. A supposedly brain-dead person writing an eloquent monologue about starving to death and digesting their own body as if they were just receiving meals in a hospital/retirement home or similar. And then complaining about the quality of the food. It's funny, you just can't see past the supposed offensiveness. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 02:00, 9 Feb 2007
- What Spang said. goshzillacorrespondence 01:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I laughed. And nothing is more important than laughter. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 13:04, 8 Feb 2007
- Keep Somewhat unencyclopedic, but good nonetheless. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 20:08, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep I think it's quite sweet, in a highly disturbing kind of way... -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Cool one. It's gneomI 08:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete as nominator. I find this article highly offensive to Terri Schiavo and also lacking in humor. It needs to be deleted for the same reason that the image of Stephen Hawking "playing" DDR was removed from the DDR article. I originally tagged this as {{merge}}; then, I gave up and tried to QVFD the article with the merge tag still present, which resulted in the article not being deleted. Thus, I'm taking this here. --Pentium5dot1 01:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Clarification: Compared to the two articles mentioned by Goshzilla, this article lacks sufficient humor value to compensate for its offensiveness. Part of the offensiveness comes from the horrible factual inaccuracy (it fails to adequately express the magnitude of Terri Schiavo's brain damage). Also, the article hasn't been worked on for quite a while (although I should probably have given other users a chance to fix it up). All in all, given how deletionist Uncyclopedia seems to be, I felt that I should have a fair chance of getting this
crap sub-optimal article deleted...but please continue discussing. --Pentium5dot1 01:34, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Counter-Clar: The inaccuracy is the point, and I have fixed the article up somewhat. goshzillacorrespondence 04:43, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Um, all right. Changing vote to Weak Delete or Possible Merge. --Pentium5dot1 17:54, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete More offensive than funny. --General Insineratehymn 02:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. It's like making an article about a 9/11 victim jumping out of the WTC window. Only worse. And I'm not even American! --Medvedev (scream) 07:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Offensive? Possibly. Funny? ....Delete. El Zoof 12:52, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- euthanize - jack mort | cunt | talk - 13:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Move to ED --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- Not shocking to me or anything but it's just not funny. --Captain Kickass 07:07, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per captain kickass --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 21:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- ED crap. - Sir Sikon [formerly known as Guest] 10:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
==
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete - it's nothing but old memes, racism and poor splelling. Hopeless. Smrt-guy 00:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not sure what that is all about but it has Japanese, Zelda, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Oscar Wilde, etc etc. It's gneomI 00:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch it Impressively sparse and cliched. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:21, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete.
“Link titles are said to stalk the night in Afghanistan, pounding young sexy man in the butt... where's my passport dammit?” ~ Oscar Wilde on Link titles goshzillacorrespondence 01:35, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Do NOT click any links! --» >UF|TLK|▋» 01:53, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- This article consists of nothing but randumbness and old memes. Delete. --General Insineratehymn 02:40, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- CRAP! Dame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 02:52, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete.----OEJ 03:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Oh, for goodness' sake. This is offal. I mean awful. ----OEJ 03:08, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Oh god. Put this article out of its misery. --General Insineratehymn 03:09, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nke. Godawful. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch it Single sentence. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 05:26, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- What? --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 06:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- If it was a bit more coherent, had a few images, and was less of a list... it would still suck. Delete. El Zoof 12:23, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Death. -- Hindleyite Converse 13:06, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Nuke itDame GUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 13:50, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Yawn. And probably slandanity. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Definite vanity. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 20:39, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Not funny, and if not vanity or slandanity... still not funny. El Zoof 22:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Boring. Roman Dog Bird 22:43, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. But it's probably not slandanity. goshzillacorrespondence 12:04, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Remove I'll bet you a pound of dollars it's slandanity. Smrt-guy 01:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per UN:VAIN. --General Insineratehymn 01:23, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Whois? It's gneomI 08:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Death by Zb. —Braydie at 13:17, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete. Pointless, offensive toilet humour, but still not funny. El Zoof 02:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Randumb --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Bye. goshzillacorrespondence 22:46, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yeuch. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:15, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- D31337 - pointless, random, offensive and not funny. Smrt-guy 01:03, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - ^^ It's gneomI 08:35, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Just some kids having poo and pee phun. I started out that way. -- di Mario 18:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Death by Zb. —Braydie at 13:15, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
--L 03:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- It's been totally raped by unfunny people who think individual sexual words are funny. A total rewrite is what this needs: might as well delete it. --Videshi 07:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- GOOD GOD, KILLKILLKILLKILLKILLKILL --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:26, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- De1337. goshzillacorrespondence 22:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Holy wasted time, Batman! What was the point? Delete Smrt-guy 01:02, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I demand back the 5 minutes I wasted reading this crap. --General Insineratehymn 01:11, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Celebrities' names are killing me. It's gneomI 08:33, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
It was edited several times on Christmas day MMVI. Author probably does not have a family. -- di Mario 18:09, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Death by Zb. —Braydie at 13:11, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- It blows. Kill it before it breeds. --Videshi 07:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Make it go away. ~ 10:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- With line such as "time travelling expedition to the 2nd hippie era," I must say delete.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Goshzilla (talk • contribs)
- The image is eye bleedingly bad. Maybe it is the visual representation of the article? --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Retrofuture42 22:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, using a gun and a bomb with a Star of David on it. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Not Funny ugly, and not an article. Oh yeah, and it's random. Smrt-guy 01:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Random and not funny. --General Insineratehymn 01:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Hmm - It's gneomI 08:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete- For the love of all that is good and sacred just be rid of it. --Captain Kickass 13:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Death by Zb. —Braydie at 13:07, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- This one goes under How to be racist and not funny. ~ 10:28, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Just not funny. goshzillacorrespondence 12:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Defamate. --Medvedev (scream) 12:30, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. El Zoof 12:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Throw to the grues. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Vaporize --General Insineratehymn 22:44, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Where exactly did you laugh? Waste of space Smrt-guy 00:59, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Uninteresting Nuff said. --Videshi 01:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete--Jsemmens 01:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It seems the New Zealanders have their share of rascists too. Not good (tm) -- di Mario 18:15, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Well it can be expanded in a good way, like without using the word dog. But at present it's not that good. Not going to vote. It's gneomI 08:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Death by Zb. —Braydie at 13:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
Delete. This seems to lack general funniness and doesn't seem to parody the Wikipedia article in any significant way. ----OEJ 01:16, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Blarch it Short, unfunny, obscure subject. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 01:32, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Wow it's pointless ha ha ha ha ha ha delete. --Videshi 01:40, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Completely useless.--Jsemmens 01:52, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huff --» >UF|TLK|▋» 02:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Reminds me of Famine. --AAA! (AAAA) 03:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - True OEJ - It's gneomI 08:29, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- anime blows --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 08:54, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Unanimate She looks too much like a certain young woman that turned me down when I was a laddy. Broke me heart at the time -- di Mario 18:19, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete She looks like my wife, only not as hot...and too anime. And becuase it's a pointless article. Smrt-guy 21:42, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- I agree it should be deleted, but I don't think it rhymes with Famine. The name is actually pronounced Nah-min-ay. Just for the record...--Captain Kickass 06:43, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Gone. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 23:06, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Huff Really short, and I fail to detect any trace of humor. --General Insineratehymn 08:37, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Incoherent rubbish about what I suspect is an unfunny in-joke. El Zoof 12:24, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - At least the quote is accurate... --AAA! (AAAA) 12:25, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Huffed by DWIII. —Braydie at 13:00, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep. Well, I was thoroughly transfixed by this article. It made me forget for a while. And it is well-written, close to the real truth and it made me
laugh smile a few times -- di Mario 18:48, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep - Put rewrite. It is not as "WTF?" as other VFD articles. It's gneomI 08:38, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete for the same reason Baldrick was nominated - it's nothing more than a completely accurate character synopsis. Kill it dead. El Zoof 04:11, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete He's right, y'know. -fish 04:35, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. "Quoting comedians is not funny." --Medvedev (scream) 20:49, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Bow-Ring. (Say it out loud)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Videshi (talk • contribs)
- Delete Copying blackadder almost word for word. Retrofuture42 22:41, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. goshzillacorrespondence 22:47, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- Huffed by ZB. —Braydie at 12:59, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
|
Delete |
- Delete...please, now.--Jsemmens 02:19, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Three short sentences and a list about a short-lived I-meme. Bah.----OEJ 17:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Random nonsense. --Medvedev (scream) 18:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - Wait, what?? --El Destructeso 20:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Sucks ass. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:02, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. With arms flailing about in a comical fashion. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:12, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete... please, 5 minutes ago. El Zoof 04:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Huffed, voting closed. -- 16:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep and expand. I liked it a lot. --Medvedev (scream) 18:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete. Short. Not interesting.----OEJ 17:37, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- d3l373 - Didn't like it. --El Destructeso 20:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Superdupermegahuff. --» >UF|TLK|▋» 22:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Move first paragraph into Dinosaur article (chuckleworthy), but then Delete the rest. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 23:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Outta Here. It had potential, "had" being the operative word. -fish 04:37, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Huffed, voting closed. -- 16:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep. As someone who's never got around to reading all of the Norris-related pages yet, I think some of it's very funny and don't want it all huffed from under my nose. So to speak. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:33, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- keep, know it wont get kept, it's a randomist list of nonsense, but it made me laugh, and THAT'S ALL THAT MATTERS - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Chuck is now a very, very worn out Internet meme/fad/cliché. He is highly undersirable on every other pages, but we have to keep a place to, let's say, release this pressure. -- herr doktor needsAbrain [scream!] 20:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Keep, if we don't, then they have an excuse to put it on other pages. Mr. Briggs Inc. 22:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- Quarinteen them here lest they spread. ---Rev. Isra (talk) 23:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per NeedABrain. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep per everyone else. goshzillacorrespondence 11:16, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as per per per. ~ 12:28, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
|
Comments |
- Yeah, yeah, well this gives n00bs a place to write them so they don't have to pollute everything else. As Israel said, "Quaranteen". Mr. Briggs Inc. 11:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- Such a place exists. It's called "Userspace." --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 18:42, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm, good point, but a big question is will some of the Norris fools here be content with that? Mr. Briggs Inc. 23:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
- I mentioned this on the Talk page already, but wouldn't it be funnier to have this page full of ACTUAL facts about Chuck? NumberJunkie 13:58, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
Kept, voting closed. Dammit. -- 16:33, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Just the fact that someone wants to delete this page is ridiculous.-Mustkillroy
- NO. De-crufting, yes. And keeping off other pages, certainly. But if this is deleted, it will be repaced with crap that is nowhere near as good as it is now, no matter how good it actually is now. I notice you didn't give any reasons either. Do you want to delete it because of the content, or the title? Because I'm sure codeine's mum knows chuck norris, if you know what I mean. Rewrite it if you think it sucks by all means, but you don't need it to be deleted to do that. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:43, 5 Feb 2007
- Keep I was going to say what Spang said, but didn't have time earlier. Keep per Spang. —Braydie at 04:00, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep the article, but Kill Chuck Norris/Facts. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 07:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Etc etc, see above. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. What's next - Jesi? The article is decent. If you have an allergy to Chuck Norris - don't read it. --Medvedev (scream) 19:02, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- keep. I agree with whichever other people said approximately the same thing i'm saying now. chuck on every page is a plague, but there's no reason he shouldn't have one page. he earned that at least and no more, plus if you delete it it will be back in a day and shitter - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:08, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep, this is one of the foundations of Uncync, as much as we try to avoid using it in new articles, we should keep the original. ~ 12:22, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- You heartless bastards! Would you kill Oscar next? Mr. T? Have you no sense of history? History!--Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 05:16, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- This is not "some kind of sick joke". I acctaully want to delete this article. I will do it to. Just as soon as you all vote for it. --Brigadier General Sir Zombiebaron 20:21, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- This is probably the one article I will vote to delete, it belongs on ED. I say keep some of the better parts (he is, despite popular belief, a man, not a joke), and actually add satire to the new article. (parody the meme, incorporate the facts into the bio, etc...) Mr. Briggs Inc. 01:22, 5 February 2007 (UTC) Eh?
|
Comments |
- Look, as sick as many people are of Chuck, I think he needs a page of some sort. Even if it's a parody of the meme or something. --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 22:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- The page needs to exist, and a bunch of the stuff there is good. I suggest we save it IF one or two good editors volunteer to clean it up. I offer myself to start, if that'll do. Smrt-guy 03:58, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Is it possible to just vote for the deletion of Chuck Norris/Facts? --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 07:37, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Would have to be a different vote. Start a new table if you think it should go. —Braydie at 07:39, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
Kept, voting closed. -- 16:28, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- Keep. The redlinks are part of the joke. goshzillacorrespondence 19:50, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Rewrite. Alaska itself, as a subject, has potential. As it stands, it needs a complete overhaul. (The article, not Alaska).
--Videshi 02:44, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep and Rewrite. Having started the 'UnRoadMap' thing (though not starting this Alaska article), I feel it has some great potential and, with a rewrite, could be good. - Enzo Aquarius 04:14, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as element of UnRoadMap. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:10, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. A good, if undeveloped, example of hyperbole. -fish 04:42, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Delete |
- Delete I see nothing redeeming in this, it's not funny, and all of the links go nowhere.--Jsemmens 17:25, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- poor - jack mort | cunt | talk - 20:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
Kept, voting closed. -- 16:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Keep |
- rewrite --» >UF|TLK|▋» 04:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. I quite like it for some reason, though it could definitely be a lot better. -- 12:20, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep not crappy enough to delete --» His Majesty King George VI (the boxes) 22:13, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but expand muchly - I'm surprised such a common word has attracted so little attention. -- (but)
Untrue Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 16:24, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep but don't expand. Cut back, in fact. Simplicity is sometimes a virtue. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Videshi (talk • contribs)
|
Delete |
- Huff. This should really be better. Let's start over. goshzillacorrespondence 03:27, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- DESTROY Awesomely short. No stub marking should be done. It sucks as well. anger2headshot 07:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- rubbish - jack mort | cunt | talk - 12:51, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
- Huff it, then do (or hope for) a better one. Smrt-guy 04:05, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
|
Comments |
- If this is deleted, then There has to go too. Either delete both or keep both. In more detail: I know that my mergist philosophy doesn't really fit in with Uncyclopedia's deletionism, but either take both pages Here and There to Pee Review first, or turn them into an infinite redirect loop. Pentium5dot1 00:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Kept, voting closed. -- 16:31, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
|